#help-28
1 messages · Page 258 of 1
hold on a minute
you understand that your polynomial has four roots not three, right?
it's a quartic, a polynomial of degree 4
also your division is wrong in the 2nd step i think.
But how to do it?
Please tell me
this 8x^3 - 20x^2 should have been 8x^3 - 20x.
and the way i would do it is
i would write the divisor as 2x^2 + 0x - 5 and then make extra sure that all powers of x are aligned properly during the long division
AND also you should not even bother with any vieta here nor expansion
but rather you will get a remainder in terms of a and b
which you set to 0
and you find a and b from matching coefficients
that's it
no vieta no fancy factorization no expansions even
(u can also do this by making two equations using the 2 roots (2x^2 - 5 = 0) and solving them)
Gotta do it again
mm you could but it's kinda overcomp imo
long division is easier, op just needs to do it properly
is it tho
and i would say also not waste time doing unnecessary things that make his own life more difficult
yeah you need to mess around with surds
or radicals
or whatever else you wanna call them
not worth!
like sure you CAN do it by those means but it's meh
you're making your own life difficult is what you're doing
by not aligning powers of x properly
and creating for yourself a MINEFIELD for fuckups
.
i said it
but it was certainly not taken into account
5x+ax+b that's the remainder
nah clearly op wants his life maximally hard 
5x+ax+b is the remainder of the division
@onyx glen
Should I have to do it again??
Y or N
idk where you messed up but this is what it looks like done properly
honestly i would not bother
$\polylongdiv{6x^4+8x^3-5x^2-20x-25}{2x^2-5}$
Ann
Aah I see
i also
strongly recommend reading 100% of what i say
and not like 60%
i really don't like it when i tell a helpee to do something only to then see them not do it
Hey @onyx glen I am really sorry, if you felt like that
I am all messed up
I am very weak in studies, I am just trying to give my best
are you also weak in instruction-following?

i would write the divisor as 2x^2 + 0x - 5 and then make extra sure that all powers of x are aligned properly during the long division
I couldn't understand some of your English words
and you didn't think to ask?
if you don't understand some word from me you always can and should ASK "what does <word> mean?"
getting help on here is a 2 way street yknow?
well you thought wrong
there are PLENTY of people here who aren't native speakers of English
(myself included)
there are PLENTY of people who struggle with English
helpers on the server don't make fun of them
@hot kernel Has your question been resolved?
well you want the remainder to be 0 right
I think it says remainder is already 0
well yes
but you need to find the values of a and b from the info that the remainder is 0
which means you need to set all the coefficients to 0
Yeah
a and b are numbers I think
Why? What's the point
That's what's asked...
the question literally asks to find the values of a and b
Closed by @hot kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I didnt help


just so you know this would've come across as a little harsh in tone, as if you're giving me an order
i deliberately ignored that since you told me you weren't good at english
but i figured that i should tell you
Better
.reopen
✅
so... i don't really know what you wanted to get from GPT there. did you want GPT to explain what i meant?
that's a better rephase but it is still a little bit broken
"could you tell me where this came from?" is how i would say it (though not the only possible way)
it's just an imperative form to tell someone to do something
Oh is it like that!
these phrases tend to be softened by rephrasing them as requests
e.g. "please...", "could you... ?"
Now if possible please tell me
didn't i already tell you
the remainder is 0 => all coefficients in the remainder are 0
Coefficient are 0
You did
So it is like that
Now it's clear
Thanks @onyx glen
.close
Closed by @hot kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Wow. I was struggling with pre-calculus and was studying for my final exam with you, I'm now in university, done with calculus 1 and doing calc 2 in the summer, it's crazy how fast time passes, lol. You probably won't know it, but you really helped me that day, thank you 🫶
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why are W and N used to represent the same thing (subspace)?
Rešitev (in bold) means solution
Depends on context. Translate if you want help faster
is it because one matrix is a mapping so we use W for it whilst we use N for just normal matrices?
I need help
go to your own channel, no offence
@inner hare Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
translation and follow up to original question
@inner hare Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @inner hare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1 or 2?
please dont make us ask you which question you're doing again
it is very annoying to keep doing that every single time
1
sry
if Re(z) > 0
arg(z) is fourth and first quadrant
so arg(z) in between
-pi/2 < arg(z) < pi/2
are you asking me a question or just yapping
is not yapping, is a fact
Why don't you answer questions?
This requires either a yes or a no as an answer.
yes
So which is the question you're asking to Ann?
because clearly, answering questions directly is a faux pas.
@torpid perch Has your question been resolved?
I was just saying that if Re(z) > 0, then z is either in first or fourth quadrant
but idk what "yapping" is
I'm non native English speaker
but its not asking a question either, was just saying my progress on the question!
Just explaining a word to you
Also you haven't even stated what your problem is yet, there's no question from you directly
I am having trouble with 1
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
what?
sometimes it takes weeks or months to get help
also, there is no rush
True
I just want to understand complex numbers correctly so I pass my exams
I'm just a troller like that, dont mind it
You can stop posting your image in multiple channels, it's counterproductive.
No one’s helping me
Have patience.
welcome to the club (patience is key)
😂
For people to help you you need to translate the question 
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
you called?
@torpid perch Has your question been resolved?
I was thinking I saw "faux pas" before I just couldn't remember from where
well
other than knowing that z lies in first and fourth quadrant
I am not sure how to proceed
@torpid perch Has your question been resolved?
Always good to see such expressions
@torpid perch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i integrate this
u = sin(3x)
the original expression is sin(6x)
how do u know
It's a standard double angle identity.
2sin(x)cos(x) = sin(2x)
or let u=cos(3x)
ohh it is
I know a third way lol
how
wait how do i do dis way
try it
idk how
calculate du/dx
what's d(cos(3x))?
looks like the rest of the integrand
or in other words, d(cos(3x))=-3sin(3x)dx
yea
the third way i can think of is using Euler's formula, do you know it?
whos euler
Leonhard Euler (/ˈɔɪlər/ ⓘ OY-lər;[b] Swiss Standard German: [ˈleːɔnhard ˈɔʏlər]; German: [ˈleːɔnhaʁt ˈɔʏlɐ] ⓘ; 15 April 1707 – 18 September 1783) was a Swiss polymath who was active as a mathematician, physicist, astronomer, logician, geographer, and engineer. He founded the studies of graph theory and topology and made influential discoveries in many other branches of mathematics, such as analytic number theory, complex analysis, and infinitesimal calculus. He also introduced much of modern mathematical terminology and notation, including the notion of a mathematical function.[6] He is known for his work in mechanics, fluid dynamics, optics, astronomy, and music theory.[7] Euler has been called a "universal genius" who "was fully equipped with almost unlimited powers of imagination, intellectual gifts and extraordinary memory".[8] He spent most of his adult life in Saint Petersburg, Russia, and in Berlin, then the capital of Prussia.
lol
Anway he was a brilliant mathematician who discovered the relationship between e^x and cosx and sinx
you know the imaginary unit i? i^2=-1?
yea
gfauxpas
gfauxpas
and multiply it by itself
$e^{3ix}e^{3ix} = (\cos(3x)+i\sin(3x))(\cos(3x)+i\sin(3x))$
see what you get when you finish multiplying
gfauxpas
it might be less confusing if you temporarily write $c=\cos(3x), s=\sin(3x)$ just so you dont have to write so many letters
gfauxpas
and you analyze (c+is)(c+is)

and then when you're done replace c with cos(3x) and s with sin(3x) again
complex numbers seem a bit unnecessary in this question to me lah
absolutely, but bum chicken asked me what the third way was
Oh okay
fr
that is not right
guys i give up im starting chemistry now
$(c+is)(c+is)=c^2 + isc + isc +i^2s^2$
gfauxpas
this is just basic algebra my friend
@vivid berry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay so my problem is to analyze whether that series converges or diverges. I tried to take the limit first? Then relate it to other common series, then tried the integral test which I probably did wrong.
Also I did see two other ways of doing this after sources pointed them out: direct comparison and telescoping series after I did partial fractions
But my main question is what did I do wrong in my work in red?
I'm mostly interested in understanding why my execution of the integral test and the following limit led to an incorrect result
Also yes I did forget to write "lim" after the improper integral, my mistake
Civil Service Pigeon
Oh yeah see I did see that and I thought about somehow redoing the limit but couldn't see how at the time
Or rewriting it actually
So that I could work with it
Hm
So
Was it right to split up the integrals in the first place? And was it right to split up the series into partial fractions in the first place as well?
Which led to the seprate improper integrals?
Yes
Closed by @surreal vine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i find the domain and range of the open circle line : (
can you read off the coordinates of the closed-circle point itself
your question seems to be asking for the domain and range of the entite function,
not each piece
oh you wrote "closed" in the original mb
ok well you see how the lower bit of the function goes off to the left and down from the open circle right
presumably off to infinity in both
and the graph is kinda ambiguous,
is that a horizontal asymptote at y = -2?
or to -∞ rather?
yeah the graph is ambiguous but it looks like it crosses y=-2
who were you responding 'yes' to :x
by definition horizontal asymptotes are at +infty or -infty wdym
oh you mean OF
not at
nm
im sorry i am so tired, but i do see how it curves and goes off to -infin.
or goes off to the left and down
so you can write down the contributions of that piece to the domain and range as (-∞, 1) and (-∞, 1) respectively
so in this case it would be both? is it because of the type of line that it is?
like it would both be (-infin, 1)
it is also asking me to find f(x)... i found the top one which i think is f(x)= {-x+7 if x (greaterthan/equalto) 3
i am having a hard time finding the f(x) for this one, the domain and the range (which you helped me answer)
if you can't type ≥ you should substitute it with >= btw
okay thanks
also you... don't need f(x) itself
okay
like lol hold on
that lower part looks to me like it might be a cube root function
you are a GOD (i still dont know how to find that)
wait
i rearranged it wrong
but that is what it is asking for if it makes it easier to know what i mean
wait
its right i think..
the breaking point on x should be 1 btw not 3
you should have cases for x < 1 and for x ≥ 1
Closed by @orchid charm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm completely lost at how the first answer was 3
Is it because if you insert 2 into the equation -2x+7 you get 3? Or is it maybe because 3 is after 2 in the sequence of whole numbers on the graph?
How exactly do I go about finding the lim x-->2 f(x) = L?
If you check the equation it's x < 2 and x>2 there's no equation for x=2
But look at the graph
Limit is just "where the point should be"
Should the point be at (2,0)?
No
Just look at the graph, and think "to make this function simple what can I make f(2) equal to"
Or ask urself "how to make this function continuous? "
Does that make sense lol
I'm making it so shady
Sus math but I hope it makes sense, I think limits are pretty intuitive
I assume that entails making the point (2,4) included so that that section is continuous
Because (2,4) on the graph is not included, it's discontinuous
Yes
But, things get complicated for limits at 0
Okay, but could you explain why L = 3?
Is it because of that specific point?
And its y value?
Because it makes the function continuous
Idk how to explain it rigorously and the rigorous explanation of limit probably isn't that helpful
So the objective of this question is to determine how to make the x value 2 continuous on the graph?
That sounds really stupid now that I read that back
I mean that like, rather than focus on the whole equation, I'm trying to make that specifc section of the graph continuous
.close
Closed by @boreal helm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This was the problem in one of my high school exams and to this day I dont know the answer
Well the f(x) has the form of | function(x) | so you tell me because the absolute value function in its own form is only non-differentiable at x=0
So we know it’s (maybe) undifferentiable where the inside is 0
Yessir
Yes indeed
Essentially it's saying get me the g(a) that outputs the possible smallest k that keeps the count of non-differentiable points on f to one
mb for interrupting, but i catched interest on the problem, and i think i can maybe explain on simpler terms
what you are being asked, is to find the smallest k such that you have a single value "p"
this directly means that the function inside of the absolute value has to have a single root.
What is g(a)
That is the exact problem
It should only have one p
We have to construct g
both functions can cross either 1 or 3 times
That is how I remebered it last time I tried to tackle it
How 3 times tho
Another thing I’m trying to do is to interpret f(x) as the distance between e^kx and bx^2
its pretty obvious to see that they cross on the negative x side of the graph
i like to see it as "ax^2" having a faster influence, meaning it grows larger quicker
and under certain a's, it will also grow larger on the positive side at first, but e^kx will eventually catch up being an exponent function
Also, I checked my last note on this problem, which also at some point directly is referencing the solution of the problem which I forgot (which is why now I am asking this here)
It's this
So 2 times?
2 times at the positive side, yeah
well, actually they can cross only once on the positive side, that will be basically your minimum value
infinitemasilly lesser than that, anyways
Huh
you can see that ax^2 gets closer to e^kx, when they cross once on x>0, theres two values "p"
so you have to use something smaller than that
I think I’m stepping out now. I will think about this question again soon 
💡 ‼️
That pretty much is the point yeah
So that the non differentiability associating with the absolute value function with a nest is a bit more fancy way to talk about intersecting points between two formulas
you can prob just set up an equation with a e^kx>ax^2 and then pull out the a with a cieling or something on those lines
if you observe the intersections, they line up with the 0's (and as so, non-differentiable points)
you basically have to analyze the rightside cause, for a positive a and k, you will always have the x<0 intersection
I see
I have no idea how to visualize of those graphs as k keeps changing in order to intuitively see when exactly does it have 3 p's and when it only has 1 p
Problematically enough, I dont even know how I came up with making this h function and why would it play an important role in this problem
ill make a new gif
mostly, as a or k grows, both graphs get "squished" to the center
so, if k is bigger, the corresponding a will also be
you already seen the a one, heres for k, you can think of the "x" increasing faster, so all values will be higher for each x
which, visually, makes it squished to the left
Ohhh my lord
rn im working on how to solve e^xk-ax^2=0
first of all, xk-lna-2lnx is a graph derivated from that, which makes the 0 more "visible"
probably W
But what you are looking for is the extreme case where the two graphs touch right
mostly cause we need a value a that is just a bit smaller than that
When k should be the minimum value of satisfying that we only get one p,
e^(kx) = ax^2 ends up implying e^2 = ax^2
Also under the same condition, by differentiating the both sides of e^(kx) = ax^2 we get ke^kx = 2ax = kax^2 (the last identity is derivable from right above fact)
e^2?
I have no idea how did I get those. I searched up for more and this was also one of the notes I left. Presumably, there were some more things to be done before getting to this part.
Why is it??
that would be only correct if they were at the same height on x=0
here the derivatives cross, while the functions dont
I'm so sorry but can you test this
I just kept scrolling the memo of mine and eventually in a lot of walls of pens there was this
g(a) = 2*root(a)/e
I'm concerned if that is the answer
Still wouldnt make me happy because I am left as having no fucking idea how to derive that
yeah it is
Okay
i think i can kinda see where it comes from, but ill check
PLEASE do thank you so much bro
ill prob come up to you tomorrow

Then Ill just maybe close this one for now
If anybody also stumbles on above convo and has their own ideas they can dm me
.close
Closed by @indigo minnow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For this task, I've figured that I dont fully understand what a base is? Like if we have a standard base, could we only pass i, j and k through the mapping f or can we pass any vector?
I know what a base is theoretically but I dont understand it practically when it comes to mappings.
@inner hare Has your question been resolved?
Also could anyone offer tutoring in the next 0-10 hours? I can pay up. I need help on understanding mapping in linear algebra.
is there any way you could explain this as if I was 5 years old? beacuse I have no clue what I just read
No
I don't think I can
You need to get familar with the coordinate vectors, bases, linear combination in order to understand these topics
I have thats the problem
I know what all of these are and understand them to some level but not in terms of mapping, at least practically
I know a basis is just a set of linearly independent vectors that form a span with their linear combination
mappings are my kryptonite though
Maybe watch this
https://youtu.be/k8xJx80yCh0?si=DN0-SYtNwO1rUL2p
Please, subscribe or support on Steady:
https://steadyhq.com/en/brightsideofmaths
Then you can see when I'm doing a live stream.
Here, I present some visualisation and calculation for the change of basis and transformation matrices. I apologise for my pronunciation. The focus is on the mathematics and not my English skills :)
(This exercise f...
on it
ok so lets say we have a vector (2,3) in a space with standard base i, j. We then have a space with its base vectors being something entirely different. Is (2,3) from the space with the standard base also (2,3) in the space with some different base vectors or is it 2*x different base vector + 3*y base different vector
I think this is my main confusion
does my question make sense or no?
It's not the same
so its not (2,3) in the different (non standard) base?
It will have different coordinates in the new basis
ok I get this
Gimme a sec
no wait I think I dont need it
but now I dont understand, if I have a mapping f right
so f: R^3 -> R^3
it can have a different base, how is this possible
wait oh my I think I understand
so the base is just the base, where the operations that you preform inside f use different base vectors with different bases
dus mapping to different coordinates
HOLY F*%KING S#IT I THINK I UNDERSTAND
is my line of thinking correct @leaden ermine ?
all a base does is represent the same thing differently
so here youre showing what (1,0) would be in the different bases?
Yes
Isn't it called a basis (singular)?
See the orange as a new coordinate system
I'm not sure how you got 1/2,1/2
A matrix that transform (1,0) from B to C can be interpreted as a rotation or translation for example
I solve the system
1 = λ_1 + λ_2 and 0 = λ_1 - λ_2
If you add both you get 1 = 2λ_1 and so on
But thats not the point, you should know how to solve linear systems
ok I understand kind of, I'll look into it a bit more, thanks
Notice that the coordinate vector is practically the vector with the new coordinates in the new bases
And you will need these to construct the new transformarion matrix A in order to map vectors from the old basis to the new basis
actually I'm confused on this, the notation throws me of a little
Read the rows component wise
how did we get 1/2,1/2 when this would be (1,1), no?
oh
what would these be called, the vectors in our column space?
wait whaat but here in this video she says that we get the same vector https://youtu.be/Qp96zg5YZ_8?si=bu1bXe8mhO2O6uLZ&t=349
This video is part of a linear algebra series:
Vectors and Bases: https://youtu.be/3ZfrJ0Sk5iY
Matrices and Linear Transforms: https://youtu.be/CBIO4xJ1Cok
Matrix inverses: https://youtu.be/ESKcF8XFzLM
This video is about changing the basis (or coordinate system) of a matrix or a vector. While the change of basis formula is often presented as...
whilst you said we get different ones
.
I was referring to the coordinates in the new basis
yea exactly
but isnt she implying here that the coordinates stay the same?
No
She is saying (2,3) can have different representations in different basis
Thats totally different from actually changing (2,3) for example you rotate it in the same basis!
is it possible that I hop in a call with you?
All I am saying is the vector (1,0) has a different representation in the basis C from B
Nah
I am also not home too
aka. different coordinates
Yes, thats literally whats inside the coordinate vector
Last thing I suggest is to really try to understand the proofs of these concepts, because then I think it makes more sense as to why something works out
Closed by @inner hare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given:
Given:
a and b are two consecutive numbers, with b > a,
x and y are also consecutive numbers, with y > x,
and b^2 - a^2 + y^2 - x^2 \neq 0
What is the value of the following expression?
\frac{b + x}{b^2 - a^2 + y^2 - x^2}
What is the value of the following expression?
\frac{b + x}{b^2 - a^2 + y^2 - x^2}
I have this q that has to be solved in under a min the books way was to solve it like this Given values for substitution (mentioned in the explanation):
y = b=2
x = a = 1
Substitution and Simplification:
\frac{b + x}{b^2 - a^2 + y^2 - x^2}
= \frac{2 + 1}{2^2 - 1^2 + 2^2 - 1^2}
= \frac{3}{4 - 1 + 4 - 1}
= \frac{3}{6}
= \frac{1}{2}
So my problem is can we assume that x=a and b=y ? I understand it’s a possibility but still how can we assume it to get an answer
Forgot the $
Closed by @hot gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have not the foggiest clue how to solve htis
Expand
Compare real and img parts after expanding
how does one do that
Observation
ohhh
im not sure this expansion is correct
36-12ki-k^2=27-36i
Closed by @fair barn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i don't understand this
pls ping after reply
beginning from the expression on the left side
at the last radical, u factorize 2⁸, u get 2⁸(1 +....) inside of that square root
@meager garnet
Imagine replacing each square root with a power of 1/2, so that every nested square root becomes an exponentiation. Then, under each root, you factor out a power of 2^(2^n)) starting from 2^8 (which is the last term shown in the image).
So first, you have (2^8)^(1/2) = 2^4
Next, you factor out (2^4)^(1/2) = 2^2
Then, you factor out (2^2)^(1/2) = 2
Eventually, at the very outermost root, you’re left with 2^(1/2) which is exactly what you started with in the first radical.
This is why it simplifies to the form shown on the right hand side.
@meager garnet Has your question been resolved?
Modus
And so on...
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
thank you both @sharp vine @remote zealot
.close
Closed by @meager garnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@sharp vine this would be the same if the it was a different base or exponent right?
but it follows the same general pattern
Yes, it could be for example 3^(3^n) and then cube root
would square root of that work
this would be cube root(3(1+sqrt1 ... )
Not exactly, I mean we wouldn't get that 1(1+(1+...))) for such a case
Yes
when it is in the form x^x^n
this would result in the (1+1(1+...)))
is this correct
Yes, but I think we also need n-th degree root
@meager garnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
What have you deduced so far
if AB =0, then det(AB)=0 right
Yes
so either det(A)=0 or det(B)=0
if both are 0 then infinite
else unique soln
if det(A)=0, then must det(B) necessarily be non zero?
in that case B is invertible, but then if we take det(B) = 0, then B isn't invertible
You have the right idea of doing casework based on the determinants
If B is invertible, then consider what happens if you multiply AB=O by the inverse of B
A=0?
oh so then, if det(B) is non zero, then A=0 and vice versa
but now what
det(A) not 0 implies B=0, and det(B) not 0 implies A=0
so are we left with the only case being det(A)=0 and det(B)=0?
Yes
Closed by @hearty holly
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
👍 In the future, please say what you’ve deduced so far when you ask the question before being prompted - it saves everyone’s time,
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@wraith vessel Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I simplify this algebraically? I am currently struggling to make sense to what I need to do to manipulate the problem to get a trig identity. Could someone break down the steps please?
sin(4x)/sin(17x)?
are you trying to prove its true
one can express it as a Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind.
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Yes this is for a limit
Use small angle approx
if you do "wavy hands" that's the idea
if you have to do it rigorously, you will use that $\lim_{X\to 0}\frac{\sin(X)}{X} = 1$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
Mhm
and make some relevant "X"s appear
i mean i think using the taylor series would be just as rigorous
which is this
Series expansion gang
Thanks everyone ^^
Closed by @shrewd meadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Ain’t no way you doing series expansion on this 
Ik lol
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I go about approaching this? I've tried writing it as a Telescoping but failed in the attempt.
Okay so what was your first step?
I tried writing the numerator as a difference of the terms in the denominator. Atp, I think that it can't be written as a Telescoping. I'm stuck.
Well the first thing I would do is sub in 3/4
What do you get in that case?
^^^
$$f\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{r=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\left(\frac{3}{4}+r\right)\left(\frac{1}{4}+r\right)}$$
Will
@ripe halo Has your question been resolved?
$$\sum\limits_{r=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{r-\frac{3}{4}}-\frac{1}{r-\frac{1}{4}}\right)$$
Will
Changed limits for convenience
It's the same Ig because the sum is till infinity? I'm just used to starting the limits from 1 😭
You can't just change it at will
$$\sum\limits_{r=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{r+\frac{1}{4}}-\frac{1}{r+\frac{3}{4}}\right)$$
Will
Doesn't lead me anywhere either ways
It does
So if we write out a few terms of this, what do we get?
@ripe halo
(Btw, you can change it like that if you want to. I didn't realise you'd done it properly)
Alright wait
Using this
Brb
$$T_1=\frac{4}{1}-\frac{4}{3}$$
$$T_2=\frac{4}{5}-\frac{4}{7}$$
$$T_3=\frac{4}{9}-\frac{4}{11}$$
Will
looks like something well known
its a pretty famous formula
What is it
But if you cant see it yet, you can try expanding the power series for arctan
it is equal to pi iirc
Idk what that it's like
Yeah
In mathematics, the Leibniz formula for π, named after Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, states that
π
4
=
1
−
1
3
…
Good lord
lol
The Maclaurin Series for arctan(x) is x - x^3/3 + x^5/5 - x^7/7 + ...
there are like way too many of these
including infinite products
that result in pi or something related
Nice
But its not so hard because the derivative for arctan is $(1+x^2)^{-1}$ and you can expand with generalized binomial theorem
Element118
This was actually a part of a Physics problem I was stuck at
its much easier than that
Oh
So the answer is just π?
Yep
It's exactly the same idea lol
Ty
oh
Though you may want to work through the derivation
Does it require Calculus
I haven't done Calculus outside of Physics
Pretty basic, just need to know how to differentiate arctan and how to integrate polynomials
1/(1+x^2) = 1 -x^2 +x^4 - x^6 +...
then integrate both sides
plug in 1 for x
and ur done
Need some theory on power series for why plugging in 1 is fine since its that the edge of the range of convergence
.close
Closed by @ripe halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yo help me in my channel if u can
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so I got something entirely different then the solution. Chatgpt and deepseek agree with me and not the maker of the notebook
Can someone check to see if I did an oopsie anywhere please. I tripple checked and found nothing
Could you send the original task? Cause I feel the translator has done something weird
I don't get the steps you did here
If I understand correctly, you wanted to compute the inverse of S in two ways, right? With the cofactors and with row-reduction?
yes
Awesome
the second one (lower) is the one that most ai's agree with
Which is the wrong one lol
The one you found above with co-factors method is correct
Oh ok then I agree too
but why does it not match with the solution?
I guess they made a mistake?
Because you still haven't finished 😅
No no (even though they don't show what the inverse turns out to be)
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
but look at the difference
they did
can we have a rule specifically for 1+1
What's the problem?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Where do you see it? 🤔
I put them in the red squares
But I don't see what the inverse turns out to be in their solution
There's only written "inverse of S"
its in the left image in the red squre
Then how can you say it's different from yours?
.close
Closed by @inner hare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Another one. I went wrong somewhere, but I cant put a finger on where exactly...
And this time chatgpt actually agrees with me
You are correct
so the teacher made an oopsie?
Yeah
@inner hare Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @inner hare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Thats my question.
I have done a and its just using the Thales theorem and
the Angle bisector theorem
then idk how to solve b
FG is a straight line
DE is a mid-segment so DE = 1/2 BC
so you can find the ratio AB/BC then GA/GC subsequently
AB = DE so AB/BC = DE/(2*DE) = 1/2
ty solved it
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @karmic helm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why do you even want to work to P[exp[-(t/theta)²) > some boundary) ???
what does that have to do with P(X>t) = exp(-(t/theta)²) cuz this is just a 1- cdf
The bottom looks like it’s a chi squares by the given identity
ye so they did this:
So it cancels or something idk
@final wing Has your question been resolved?
@final wing Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @final wing
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do is have to fivid 70 by 2 to get the perimeter of the shape for 4 rectangels?
yeah
but then how do i work out the area of the 8 sided shape?
length is 7cm longer than width
?
yes ofc mb
and u have perimeter of the shape
so write it in terms of x
and equate
dose not make sense
why?
why
.close
Closed by @lapis merlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know how to solve this (by drawing a venn diagram) but my work is so messy it's hard to keep track
I also don't know how to do certain steps
3 dozen pies right?
so 36 pies
i already know that
if a third of the 36 pies were chocolate, you do 36/3, which equals twelve
so 12 chocolate pies
oh right
please only help if you only know how to solve it
Show us your steps so we could help maybe?
Or show us your venn diagram
its true, but you want the smallest number of pies that had none of these ingredients, so assuming no overlap of ingredients provides the smallest number of non-ingredients
yes i know that but i also want to solve it through venn diagram
because i am not too good at that
there is no venn diagram needed, it would just be 4 non-overlapping circles
(in a big circle if you want a circle for all the pies)
Closed by @cedar flint
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What are the generalized binomial koefficients defined by
@storm flint Has your question been resolved?
@storm flint Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @storm flint
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Same idea for c
E
So if I change it to 7 it should be good?
Yes
Lifesaver ty 🙏
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@rotund tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rotund tinsel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It asks for the limit of the expression in +inf
15 no
Yeah 15
ok
Globalement ln(x)/x c'est 0
Et les ln² tu peux faire une identité remarquable
Et trouver quelque simplification avec les propriétés du logarithme
Idts thats even needed
How would you do it
ln^2(x+1) is greater than ln^2 x when x approaches infinity
Unless you werent saying apply logarithm properties
in which case my mistake
Yeah i mean both are working but depends on the justification they are waiting for
If they only want algebraic
Or some analysis
True, if its written then go for log properties
Nothing written about the method tho
@wary badge Has your question been resolved?
is its ans c
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello gang

