#help-28
1 messages · Page 246 of 1
the argument angles are wrt real axis
oh yeah i was looking at angles inside the triangle but im supposed to look at the rotation
alright
but how do we link them toegtehr now
maybe since r1 is equal to r2
we can split up the z1?
since z1 would have the same components
so we would get
z2 * e^i pi/3
yh, alright for ii?
so i plug it in
and i get z2^2 ( e^i 2pi/3 + 1)
but here i get stuck
can you write (e^i 2pi/3 + 1) in the form a + bi?
so e^i2pi/3 is -1/2 + (sqrt3/2)i
yea
so we add one, that would just give us 1/2 which is in first quadrant. so pi/3?
np
.close
Closed by @sturdy fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Put your hands up now!
It is something written on my book
Ridiculous
Ridiculous
Ridiculous
That’s unacceptable
For me
Define -5 units towards the right
That’s idiotic
That’s not right
not funny.
Can we say go -5 units rightward
I cannot accept that expression
cry about it or sum :shrug:
english doesn't do double-negatives btw
but also you are being quite over-dramatic rn
it is a strange turn of phrase but "go -5 right" is very easy to reinterpret as "go 5 left"
I’m so sad at the fact that teacher might put this double negative expression on kindergarten question
They are just kids!
bro ong im seeing red reading this wtf
when i see red RUN.
when i see run, RED.
see red run i, WHEN.
@golden shore Has your question been resolved?
Yeah thats just 5 units to the left..
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would like to do this using Lagrange interpolation
$\frac{x+1}{1} + \frac{(x+2)(x+1)x}{ 70}$ would be a degree 3 interpolation
What a wonderful world !
oops
would not be lagrange tho
the interpolation would be $\frac{(x+2)(x+1)x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)}{ -5 \cdot -8 \codt -15 \cdot -20 \cdot -17}$
What a wonderful world !
the interpolation would be $\frac{(x+2)(x+1)x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)}{ -5 \cdot -8 \codt -15 \cdot -20 \cdot -17}$
```Compilation error:```! Undefined control sequence.
<argument> -5 \cdot -8 \codt
-15 \cdot -20 \cdot -17
l.1422 ... \cdot -8 \codt -15 \cdot -20 \cdot -17}
$
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.```
applying lagrange on this is gonna be kiiiinda painfu-
what?
are you sure about this
thats a 6th degree poly
yea, this gives the poly, right
I'm not trying to show that it's a 3rd degree poly, just trying to interpolate it
I know, but during my last viva I was asked to do it by hand for a data set
so not taking any chances this time
how big was the data set
Atleast 4-5 points
I think I should chose a smaller data set
do thse number work
wiat
oops
okay, this works
f(0)=2, f(1)=2.75, f(2)=4?
not that it matters here
$L_0(x) = \frac{ (x-2.75)(x-4)}{ (2-2.75) \cdot (2-4)}$
\
$L_1(x) = \frac{ (x-2)(x-4)}{(2.75-2) \cdot (2.75-4)}$
\
$L_2(x) = \frac{(x-2)(x-2.75)}{ (4-2) \cdot (4-2.75)}$
What a wonderful world !
And Then I use the fomula $\sum_{i=0}^{2} f(x_k) L_k$
What a wonderful world !
Closed by @thick hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
,rotate
or
@elder fiber Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
150X=35 MOD 31
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
since (a,31)=1 for every a is positive integer where a≠31 So
divided both side by 5 you’ll get
||30x con 7 (mod 31)|| and since
||30x con (31-1)x|| con ||-x con 7 (mod31)||
thus
||x con -7|| con ||24 (mod 31)|| as required
@manic cape Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @manic cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
'following the diagram, if the coefficients of friction are 0.4 and 0.5, what is the minimum value of applied force F to start movement of the system?'
the hanging body is 1 kg, middle is 2 kg, right is 3 kg.
by coefficients are 0.4 and 0.5, this means that the static coefficient is 0.5 and the kinetic coefficient is 0.4 (its a bit strange but this is how the questions are written, others are like this)
also assume g=10
now the intended answer is 35N, which i got but not quite. i treated the whole system roughly as one body. trying to find the point at which net force = 0 when friction is in play to find the point at which movement begins.
the hanging mass to the left is pulling on everything, with a force of mg or 10N. next, the friction forces for each of the two boxes on the surface. for the 2kg mass, 0.5 x 20 = 10N. same for the 3kg mass, 0.5 x 30 = 15N.
add it all up, i got 35 N going to the left. now the force must be 35N in the other direction to counteract start movement.
however, the force is inclined at 53 degrees. breaking up the force, i got F x cos53 for along the horizontal line. rounded this to 0.6F.
so i take this to mean 0.6F must be greater than or equal to 35N, meaning F is roughly 58.3. however, the given answer is just 35N.
did i do something wrong? or am i correct? (usually im wrong)
I think you are right
I checked seems like 35 to the right is the right answer
I would guess the question just mixed up the answer
.close
Closed by @warm quiver
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Here I am trying to prove equality for the first case when f is injective. Is it sufficient to take the contrapositive of "If f is injective then equality" meaning if I prove that "Not equal then f is not injective "
Also I'm having doubts about whether I correctly stated the contrapositive
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
This is the page, the problem is at the bottom
actually idt going for the contrapositive is a good idea at all.
orrr
no you can make it work actually it's not that bad
What would be a better way(any general hints would be good)
assuming it's equality without injectivity then showing a contradiction?
when $S \subset T$ but $S \neq T$, it implies there exists a point in $T$ that doesn't belong to $S$.
Ann
why not just do it directly
yeah i guess
do it directly and worry much less about quantifiers as i was about to write
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @dawn hinge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
use definition of derivative
ok
but what do i do with that?
if the first question is about differentiability and not derivability
what do you think the word differentiability means
i know that derivability implies differentiability but not always the otehr way?
orr
for question 1, do i only need to show that the partial derivatives exist and are continuous on C?
one of the first two equations
finding df is a little harder
oh not that much harder. if f(x, y) = u(x,y) + i v(x,y) then
@unborn acorn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you explain why a/b has to be between 1 and 2 for dimpled cardioid like $a+b\cos(\theta)$
Odd_the_Wolf
@chilly pecan Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @chilly pecan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(\log_b(a)+\log_b(c)=\log_b(ac),\quad a,c>0)
PajamaMamaLlama
Ln(x+4)(6-x)
(\ln_e(x+4)+\ln_e(6-x)=\ln_e(x+4)(6-x),\quad a,c>0)
can u do that
does that work
indeed it is true that (\ln(x+4)+\ln(6-x)=\ln((6-x)(x+4)))
PajamaMamaLlama
well if that log of (6-x)(x+4) is equal to the log of 21, then (6-x)(x+4) must be equal to 21 itself, yes?
so we remove the ln?
right, mathematically that is, (\ln((6-x)(x+4))=\ln(21)\implies (6-x)(x+4)=21)
PajamaMamaLlama
where that long arrow is read as "implies"
I sense the quadratic formula
me too
ok cus
i have
-x^2-2x=24
we have to do quadratic cus we cant factor cus the x^2 is negative right/
sorry +24
not =
ohhh
wait
oh yeahhh why if forgot basic math
did you expand that right?
did i?
happens to everyone :) practicing usually helps with that
then we find two numbers that add to 2 and multiply to -3
indeed
so we have x=-3, and 1
@winter patio Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @winter patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello! i need help with this problem
i don't know why in step 3 the bottom part of the fraction gets canceled out
and why in the 5th step the (x+4) just dissappears
<@&286206848099549185>
What’s the translated problem statement?
i think: radical ecuations that get reduced to second grade
i'll send u the other part
and this is a solution
i do understand this one
steps 6 and 7
yes
the problem is getting solved
but i dont understand steps 3 and 5
why the denominator in step 3 and the x+4 in step 5 just get wrecked
gimme a minute or two to try to parse the algebra
for sure, tysm
I think i understand the manipulation done here
lemme see
for step 3 if the denominator is not 0 then you can multiply it on each side of the equation and on the right side it will be eaten up by the 0
so implicitly it is assumed here that x is not 3,-4,or -5
is this satisfactory
i see
so
it can happen with any given denominator when the equation is =0?
cuz u multiply it on each side
you can do this simplification when the denominator is not 0 yes, you might have to check the neglected cases x = 3,-4,-5 separatly
yep
you can divide if it’s not 0
no to get here we already assumed in step 3 that x is not -4
wait wait, but why is that we assume that x cant be -4,-5 or +3??
but then in step 5 there are two possible cases for this equation to be equal 0. either x=-4 it can’t because step 3, or the other expression is 0, what’s hilighted in yellow
oh
i think i get it
so its like u get 2 different equations =0 for each parenthesis
i mean one equation for each equal to 0
it’s another of seeing it beside cancelling the x+4
because if x equals one of these 3 values, we would divide by 0, and this operation is undefined
you just can’t divide by 0
in these case some other simplification might happen if it’s important to take care of these cases
you have to solve another way using the fact that x = 3 for instance
basically x cant be the number that's next to it with the opposite sign
when in the denominator
in this type of problems
=0
yep
alrighty, that would be all
have a nice afternoon, thank you very much
really appreciate it
❤️
.close
Closed by @digital mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I speak Spanish. Can someone help me solve this please?
<@&286206848099549185>
does the overbar mean it's a number?
for example \overbar(abc) where a = 1, b = 2, and c = 3, would be 123?
yes
what have you tried?
Ok, what have you tried with this one?
I have tried and come to the following conclusions: a is greater than c; z is greater than c; y is greater than b
Since they must all be one-digit numbers and a and c must be different from 0, the only numbers that meet this requirement would be a as 7, c as 3, and z as 4.
By replacing the values the subtraction would be contradictory
have you tried writing \overbar(abc) as 100 a + 10 b + c, and solving algebraically?
no
My teacher in class taught us something like the minuend plus subtrahend plus subtraction equals two minuends.
I don't know if that is useful
$$A - B = C \implies A + B + C = 2A$$
try that with your example
Shuba
A, B, and C are all numbers, not the digits in a number
look at this
estos son los unicos valores que cumplen los de 56 pero no cumplen la resta
Have you managed to solve the problem? I've started to think it's poorly stated.
to be honest, I'm not sure of any smart ways to solve this, other than getting a computer to brute-force through every combination until it finds something that works.
creo que el problema esta mal porque yo intente lo de la computadora
I think the problem is wrong because I tried the computer thing.
from itertools import product
def num(*digits):
buffer = 0
for digit in digits:
assert 0 <= digit <= 9, "Error: digit is not base 10."
buffer = buffer * 10 + digit
return buffer
def find_solution(verbose=False):
for a,b,c,y,z in product(range(10), repeat=5):
if verbose:
print(f"Trying a={a}, b={b}, c={c}, y={y}, z={z}")
if not (a > c):
continue
if not (a**2 + c**2 - z**2 == 56):
continue
if not (num(a,b,c) - num(6,y,z) == num(c,b,a)):
continue
return a,b,c,y,z
solution = find_solution(verbose=True)
if not solution:
print(f"No solution found :(")
exit()
a,b,c,y,z = solution
print(f"\nSolution Found!")
print(f"a={a}, b={b}, c={c}, y={y}, z={z}")
print("")
print(f"{a}{b}{c} - 6{y}{z} == {c}{b}{a}")
print(f"{a}^2 + {c}^2 - {z}^2 == 56")
?
it's a python program to find the solution
do you execute it?
Maybe you can write it as \overbar(abc) = 100a + 10b + c for every number, and solve algebraically
which I mean, find a simple algebraic expression, and then keep trying values until one suceeds
or not, there may be too many values to try
I'll give you a hint, c = 1
Bro, if there is an answer, since I'm feeling unmotivated because I think there is no answer.
there is an answer
It's okay, I'll keep trying.
To solve algebraically should I use this?
I can't see where you'd use it
you need the python interpreter
Do you know how to program, bro?
Bro, do you know any way to solve it mathematically since I have to make a solution for my notebook?
I'm working on that one XD
you can rewrite the equation into $$99(a-c) = 10y + z + 600$$
Shuba
Shuba
This is as far as I've been able to reduce it.
Ah, I've seen something
This should have a use if we use it?
$$99x = 600 + 10y + z = \overline{6yz}$$
Shuba
So 6yz is a multiple of 99
this should easily tell you what y and z are
which should allow you to easily tell what x is
the maximum value of x would be 1
Now we know x, y, and z we will use this to find a and c knowing a - c = x.
Sorry, nothing to do with this, my mistake
there's only 2 options for a and c, only one of which will fit the second equation
hope this helps 🙂
Okay bro, I'll keep trying and I'll give you the solution.
- Use
\overline{abc} = 100a + 10b + cto expand the first equation. - Simplify to get
99(a-c) = \overline{6yz} - Recognise this means the RHS is a multiple of
99, and solve fory,z, and(a-c) - Write out all possible combinations of
aandcusing the solution for(a-c) - Use the second equation to determine which we need to use
why plus brother
I think it's because the negative sign comes before the 600+10y+z.
I should put parentheses
I have come to the conclusion that x equals 7. How could I continue developing the resolution?
@placid oak
@stuck sleet Has your question been resolved?
@stuck sleet Has your question been resolved?
Where's your original question?
wait moment pls
.
here
We found the values of the unknowns with a Python code that tested all possible numbers, but I need the mathematical solution.
for the resolution I stayed here
Xd
@stuck sleet Has your question been resolved?
@stuck sleet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can you prove (a)?
if x is an 11th power mod p use FLT to deduce something about x
so if x is not 0
an 11th power is a root of x^k - 1 = 0 mod p
so how many of them are there?
uhh what do you mean?
so let's say x is an 11th power
x = y^11
then x^k = y^(p-1) = 1 mod p
so x^k - 1 = 0 mod p
the third one, idk if I used the right formulas, is it correct to use the liner interpolation to find r?
or is this completely unrelatsd and im dumb
well at most k
!occupied, and delete the message please 
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
tbh the thing i guided you through only gives you that it has at most k solutions
which for the most part still motivates why we should pick primes that are 1 mod 11
anyway if you wanna prove that there are exactly k+1 11th powers, use the fact that we have a primitive root mod p
oh so basically the reason your finding p≡1 mod 11 is to find p with as little ranges for x^11 mod p?
yh
yh and 23 should work i think
but anyway if that doesn't work you'd try 67 instead
anyway knowing how to choose moduli is a really useful trick to know about
a^11+11b^11+19c^11=0 mod 23 hmm
alright ill keep that in mind
another question i have in mind is
do there exist integers x,y, such that x^3 + y^4 = 2015^2015
(i think it was 2015^2015 at least)
and also is there a positive integer n such that n^7 - 77 is a fibonacci number
wtf 💔
btw (cheating with calculator) x^11=0,1,22 mod 23, is there a way to find that?
cus with that i think you can solve the question with that as x^11=0 mod 23 is when 23|x t
x^11 is a root of t^2 - 1 = 0 mod 23
so x^11 can be 0, +-1
@hoary ember Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hoary ember
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
△ABC is an acute triangle, P is a point on the circumcircle Γ of △ABC, and line PB and PC are tangent to Γ. ∠BPC=θ, what's the value of cos A (in terms of θ)?
@blissful ledge Has your question been resolved?
connect OB, OC
OB is perpendicular with BP and so are OC and CP
therefore <BOC = 180-theta
and <A= 180-theta/2

. close
.close
.close
Closed by @sullen hinge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know the answer is correct because I saw the answers, but is my proof right as well?
@median gust Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @median gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
HELP I DONT GET THIS
which part don't you get?
ah, so do you recall the integral of $\frac{1}{a^2 + t^2} \ dt$?
south
a is a constant
ohhhhh
oh ok thanks
it's midnight here and my brain is missing neurones and my exam is tmr so im low-key panicking
i usually use θ
thanksss
Goodluck tomorrow
Closed by @dusky girder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me on how to differentiate a complex function
(2z^2 + i)^5
z= x +iy
do you have to do it from first principles?
or are you allowed to use differentiation rules
teacher said i cannot differentiate the way we differentiate real functions
so what are you allowed to use
first principle and differentiation rules
?!
oh like forbidden?
so you are allowed differentiation rules but not the usual differentiation rules you know from real functions?
kind of i guess
which rules are you allowed to use
yeah
dear lord that's gonna be so ass if you have to do it from first principles
seconding this
power rules only
multiply it out then
yeah idk what to do
binomial theorem
so (f+g)' = f'+g' is forbidden?
what if that is also forbidden?
i forgot how to differentiate complex function
oh dear lord pls no
the whole point is that you differentiate complex functions the same way as real functions
there is nothing special to do
ohh thanks
but you seemingly arent allowed to do that
i asked friend of mine he said we cant do it the way we differentiate real ones
as teacher said it earlier
you should have a more clear definition of "not like real ones". As in, which properties in particular you're allowed (or not) to use
binomial and cr eqn will be enough
@drowsy plover Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let's say we have a function like this:
x+2 = y
Now, is "x+2" called definition, and is "y" called output?
For context, I'm making a graph renderer and looking for appropiate names for my variables
I've also heard that "x+2" should be called "expression", but not sure if it's correct
Definition works.
The whole statement "y = x+2" is an equation, and x+2 is an expression, but these names would be generally understandable.
that seems good, thanks
the whole thing is the definition of the function
at that point you might aswell just call it formula
x+2 would more likely be the called the expression/formula of the function
you mean like this?
"x+2" <- formula
"y" <- output
I mean in the end you have to live with your code
I would start to question the whole setup. why do you need an output variable, its just gonna be y all the time, no?
@safe plaza Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @safe plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @thick hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for finding domain and stuff , when to use wavy curve method and when to use intersection ( like writing out diff ineqalities and taking intersection)
i need a generalisation on this
( im having very bad brain fog rn , so i cant really pull things together :/ )
its basically the same thing
if u r given many functions
u use wavy curve for the functions, then use the intersection part on them all
ull get it with more practice
Closed by @weak olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why should discriminant be less then 0 for c
You want the condition for invariant lines to fail
You showed that the condition is equivalent to that quadratic having (real) solutions
No invariant lines -> condition fails -> quadratic has no real solutions -> discriminant is negative
@static verge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I find that angle?
extrapolate the weight vector to form a right triangle. Sum of the angles in a triangle are 180, and the intersection between the ground and the weight vector is 90 degrees, so the angle you're looking for is 90-theta
@shut trellis Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How are we able to combine $f(x+h) - f(x)$ into a single series?
LXDL
Like it seems we just somehow drop the limits
you can combine by the Weierstrass M-test
the terms inf f(x) and f(x+h) converge uniformly so the sum can be done term by term
@swift bridge Has your question been resolved?
Ah okay. This doesn’t have to do with the fact that we can fix x and h and then apply limit rules?
Weiestrass M-test implies that the series converge uniformly to f(x) but then how come Inifork convergence implies we can sum term by term?
Like isn’t that still possible since both series converge?
Specifically is uniform convergence necessary?
To add term by term wise
@swift bridge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the answer number 2?
are you allowed to use calc at all times?
Na
On my test its taken away
@gloomy lance can u explain how pie effects a graph
This isn't something exclusive to pi, any other number in the place of pi/4 would change the graph
in general, a function y=f(x) will have a horizontal shift when you apply f(x+a)
f(x+a) if a is positive will shift the graph to the left, if it is negative it will shift the graph to the right
f(x+3) shifts the function's graph to the left by 3 units
And x-3 moves the graph to the right
exactly
so if we have f(x)=tanx, then f(x+pi/4)=tan(x+pi/4) shifts the graph of tanx to the left by pi/4
yes
pi/4 is just pi/4
🗿
you move pi/4
you take the original points and subtract pi/4 from them
for example, the point at x=0 will be shifted to x=-pi/4
yes
what do you mean
,w graph -tanx
,w graph -x²
Wait upside down or side to side
upside down
in this case it also makes sense to think of it as flipping to the other side
yes
you sent the same picture as before
Yea
ah i see
The question was jus about negative
yes -tanx would be number 1
yw
What, period?
Yea
The period of a function is the distance at which the function starts repeating itself basically
Oh
For sinx and cosx that would be 2pi, for tanx its pi
The formula for the period of tan(a*x) would be pi/|a|
Cuz the graph hits pi again on the next shift
So for tan(3x), the period is pi/3
No
You divide by the absolute value of the number that is multiplying x
tan(ax+b) has period pi/|a|
Also the period isn't affected if there's a number multiplying tanx
4tan(x-pi/4) has the same period as 3tan(x-pi/4)
What is the absolute value
You have some catching up to do man
The absolute value of a number x, denoted |x| is defined as
|x|=x, if x≥0
|x|=-x, if x<0
I.e. , it turns the number that you input positive
If its already positive it stays positive
|3|=3, |-3|=3
Right
But dis isnt in thequestion
It's in the formula for the period of a tangent function of the form c*tan(ax+b)
Which is pi/|a|
Because of this
I dont rlly get that
It's just the formula
You should've been taught that
Have you paid attention to class
The formula for the period of sin(ax) and cos(ax) is 2pi/|a|
for tan(ax) it's pi/|a|
the period of $\tan(ax+b)$ is $\dfrac{\pi}{|a|}$
r4f43l1006
check it in desmos or smth
But dis one has a 4 in the front
the 4 in the front doesn't affect the x values
Oo
So will tan graphs always be pi
For p
And same with cot
no its pi/|a|
Pi over |a|
@plucky aurora Has your question been resolved?
Mnfok
Closed by @plucky aurora
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if they say
a ⊥ b ⊥ c
does that imply a ⊥ c
because A could be ⊥ to C
but
A could also be parallel
to C
Well perp is not a transitive relation
So they’re being ambiguous with it
Where are you seeing this?
@odd hill Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @odd hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a bit of general question I have: could one visualise volumes of solids of revolution on desmos 3D?
i lowkey think it would be fun to look at
very cool, i should have looked there first
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@sharp harbor Has your question been resolved?
@sharp harbor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@sturdy valve Has your question been resolved?
feels like something to do with vieta's formula
uhhh for any polynomial like $(x-r_1)(x-r_2)(x-r_3)\dots (x-r_n)$ its coefficient are symmetric sums of roots
parabolicinsanity
i think...
something like that
so i think coeff of this would just be the sum of the roots... maybe i think
now you do
just brush up on vieta's formulas
i guess
ex : $(x-r_1)(x-r_2)(x-r_3)=x^3-(r_1+r_2+r_3)x^2+(r_1r_2+r_2r_3+r_3r_1)x-r_1r_2r_3$
parabolicinsanity
no, they're symmetric sums
different things
just look into this
just keep in mind these are
uhhh
symmetric sums
so symmetric sum notation
weird that-
you have a problem on that but don't know how to do it...
😔 that's just vieta's formulae, brush up on it i guess and you'll be fine
but do notice
the first term is
(r-x)
so reverse it
Closed by @sturdy valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
happy mathing 
you just have to find it so
there's a certain joy in being able to solve mathematical problems
find it
you'll never be able to stop after that
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @austere cove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
weird...
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to answer part e iii. In the previous parts, I claimed that B and C were both not compact so I attempted to use Hausdorfness as a topological property to prove B is not homeomorphic to C. I claimed C is Hausdorff as for all distinct x,y in Z, we can take the open neighbourhoods U of x and V of y to be the balls of radius 1/2 centered at x and y respectively which are disjoint. Im now struggling to show B is not Hausdorff. Ive written the definition of Hausdorffness but wasnt sure what to do then. I'm also wondering if contradiction is the correct path for this. Any help would be appreciated!
contradiction is always a bit easier when you want to prove two spaces are not homeomorphic to each other, because then supposing they are you get existence of a homeomorphism between them and you can play with it
so the idea is that B has accumulation points but C doesn't, all points of C are isolated
which is what you did
To show B is hausdorff though
B should be hausdorff shouldn't it?
for any two distinct points x and y of B
take B(x,delta) and B(y,delta) with delta = |x-y|/3 as neighborhoods of x and y respectively
A metric space is always gonna be hausdorff
Ah yeah good point. I forgot all metric spaces were Hausdorff haha. We've only covered the topological properties of Hausdorff, compactness and connectedness and since (I think) theyre both not compact, that only leaves Hausdorff and Connectednes and I'm fairly sure theyre both disconnected, so I'm not really sure how else to show they're not homeomorphic.
Wait unless they are homeomorphic
they're not
If B and C were homeomorphic, let f:B->C be a homeomorphism
{0} is an open subset of C (why?)
thus {a} is an open subset of B for some a in B
Is {0} an open subset of C as it has subspace toplogy and the interval say (-1/2,1/2) is open in standard topology so (-1/2,1/2) intersect C which is {0} is open in C?
And then {a} cant be open in B as whenever we intersect B with an open subset of R, it will include irrationals which aren't in B or something?
uh no that's not it
if you intersect B with an open subset of R
by definition of B
it's only gonna contain rationals
Ah ofc haha
the idea is indeed to look at what are the open subsets of B for its topology
just imagine how many numbers are gonna be in open subsets of B
imagine (a,b) intersected with B
and get rid of cases where it's empty
I see. Are there gonna be an infinite amount of points when (a,b) is intersected with B? Could this possibly have something to do with the closure of B being the whole interval [0,1] or something?
B is dense in [0,1] (or the closure of B in R is [0,1])
yeah
so it's gonna coincide with every single open subset of [0,1]
you can split an open subset into as many disjoint open subsets as you want (with some extra points here and there)
there's an infinity of rational numbers between a and b
Closed by @prisma pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please
like i juts cant with these natural logs
take log of both sides
,tex .log power
riemann
so
what do you get after taking log of both sides
so log(x-3)=2log(x+2)
no
log(e^x-3)
y is in the exponent on the left side
so e is the x right
for the left side, yes
is x-3 not y
x-3 is in the exponent yes
so is this correvt
you're missing parentheses
log(e^(x-3))
correct. that's the left side. now use this
correct
solve for x
does log e equal 1
yes
i have
(x-3)=(x+3)log2
am i ssupposed to divide by log
2
oh my god
girl can i have a new helper
like i just cant
solve for x
girl i asked u to guide me im iunsure on how to do the whole thing its just frustratingatm
you're making progress
im unsure on how to solbe for x with this set up, am i distributinh
riemann
hes one of the best helpers ull get lol
im sorry
idk whats wrong w my brain todsy
but it jusy doesnt wnt to understand for some resson
i stil dont understand
do this
to the right side
so is it xLog2 +3log2
correct
Closed by @winter patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Dhairya
at alpha = 1 its zero so 0
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im back
i know this is elementary
ik how to do it but my teacher want it done w no calculator
like how is tht possible
How do you do it ? And Let’s see if you can figure out a way without a calculator.
yes pls
cus
i have
2800(1+0.15)^4
for part
a
i simplified it ot
to
2800(4.60)
but thats def wrong
yesa it is
maybe use the binomial
Do you know about compound interest
no i forgot it
use the squared term
seems like you just did 4 * 1.15 = 4.60
but it's 1.15^4 = 1.15 * 1.15 * 1.15 * 1.15
if its too small you can approx it to 1.60
i wouldnt wanna do that without calculator
if i had to do it without calculator, 1.15 = 23 / 20 so i'd instead do that
23 * 23 = 529, if we are allowed to approximate a bit, say it's 530
530 * 530 = 280, 900
now just divide that by 20^4 = 16 * 10^4
28,09 / 16 (approximately 28 / 16 = 7 / 4 = 1.75)
1.75
But isn’t that much like I don’t understand why he just doesn’t let us use a calculator
He’s so evil
It’s a review for my exam
how accurate does he require the stuff to be
