#help-28
1 messages · Page 197 of 1
1?
huh
we plugging 1 for n right
so whats wrong on mine
thats the right answer damn i was so close yet so far but explain rq
nah ur not right here
where did i mess up
well for me i thought the negative would cancel out with the (-1) to get positive
but it alternates so i forget but i still dont see how the (-1)^n-1 is not needed or the -1
we are saying it doesnt alternate
mhm
it would
but we would have a negative remaining
we have (-1)^n * (-1)^{n-1}
but if we do it through there and i plug that in
the alternate sign is still there no?
no
thats like a template
hold on
my brain goes fk mode when ln is anywhere in equation
so because there is a negative in front of the summation the (-1)^n disappears? @agile holly
if theres a negative in front we wont have that correct?
i see the derv of that is always neg when we plug for x
ty for help
.close
Closed by @crystal ibex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
fire illustration bro
idk man
so you’re looking for the initial velocity yea
yeah
which formula do you think will be helpful here
that’s useful for time it takes to hit the ground
v = u + at
then but idk what time or initial is
wym
^
x or y direction
and what are you looking for
we also know vy = 0 at its maximum height so we should find that maximum height
uy = usin40
yea i’m used to using vo my bad
yea genuinely I thought abt all this but there's not enough information to plug into any of the formulas
sorry I gtg
oh
Closed by @sturdy nymph
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm just curious on a homework
given an orthonomral set = {u_1, u_2, u_3}
actually, much better to just send the photo
you can quickly verify that {u1, u2, u3} is ON by checking that each of the vectors has norm 1, and are all OG to each other
as for the second part, it should just be a standard system of equations you can solve
yup, i've already done the orthonormal set
scalar is what i'm having trouble with
i've figured out 2 and 3
lambda_2 is give which is -3
lambda_3 i've gotten which is 3 / sqrt(2)
but lambda one, it says the answer should be 1 / sqrt(2) but I keep getting 2 / sqrt(2)
@distant swan Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How did he find these new bounds?
@fast marlin Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
let's make sure you understand this part first
do you know how we get this diagram?
No
take a look at the bounds of your double integral
0->3
the dx comes first so we know 3y <= x <= 3 and dy comes second so we have 0 <= y <= 1
so were trying to draw that region first, in case we need to alter the boundary values
How do you know 3y is less than or equal to x
it is the lower bound of the integral when taking it with respect to the x variable
Is that because x=3y?
we will use that idea, yeah. im looking specifically at this part of the double integral: $\int_{3y}^{3} e^{x^2) dx $
ah dang
Oh now it’s up?
$\int_{3y}^{3} e^{x^2) dx $
Give it a min maybe
this part:
Yeah that makes sense
so basically if we can do this integral first, then do the dy one next, we gucci.
but this integral has no antiderivative, so we look to integrate wrt y instead
so we try to figure out whats going on with x
x is always bigger than 3y but less then 3 according to the bounds
once we know that, we can look at the y bounds, which say y is between 0 and 1
now our goal is to draw all four bounds: (1) x=3y, (2) x=3, (3) y=0, (4) y=1
the region of integration is bounded by these lines
Okay I think I got it
understanding how they get the picture is the most important part, for sure!
Can you give me a practice one to see if I got it?
$\int_{0}^{2} \int_{2x}^{4} (3x+2)dydx$
see if you can change the bounds from starting with y to starting with x
we may need to alter the upper bound to 4, sorry!
trying to create one in my head at 1:50am is challenging lol
Like this?
yep! drawing looks good, its the upper triangle
i got this:
$ \int_{0}^{4} \int_{0}^{y/2} (3x+2)dxdy$
Oh right because we want to change it to x
yep
@fast marlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is your method of thinking during an math exam
Like I believe I learned every concept thoroughly but when I get a question I don't know how to solve it
Im theorising it's due to a problem with the way I analyse it
personally id try to skip those at the start and leave them to the last
But idk maybe it's a skill issue
true...
Then I'm just skipping the whole exam at the point
🔥
They are the questions with the bigger scores
give a big skim through the whole text firstly and try to evaluate the difficulty of every exercise so that you can organize the order of the exercise as you please
some exercises could be easy but they could take a great amount of concentration, so I am likely to do them firstly ...or they could be difficult exercises but they just need the right idea to being solved
@blissful lichen Has your question been resolved?
No it isn't cus the thing I wanna know is not how to organize the questions in the paper rather I want to know how I should think in order to solve them
I want to know how I can get into the right idea! That's what I want to know
"depends on the question"
Give me a basic process
valentine I think it is pretty much the same thinking way that you use during you practice at home
IT DOESNT WORK
.stop
I wanna close this chat cus I don't think my problem is gonna be solved
Thank you so much for trying
I think so
np
How do I stop it
.close
Closed by @limpid moat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so what I was thinking was
Are you asking us how to prove ∃n∈N(11 | 2^n -1)?
I mean it's trivial to verify that $11 \mid 2^{10}-1$
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
Yes
n msut be s.t. 2^n-1 is at least greater or equal than 11
yeah i m jk lol
ohh 2^0-1=0 and 11 does divide 0
0 is not in the naturals ?
i dont think so
N does not include 0, W does
thats how its defined for us in textbooks
I know that -1 for example is not in the naturals ...by I would not take for granted that 0 is not in the natural...I think I can find very quicly an exercise where 0 is supposed to be inside the st $\mathbb N$
everg
what is W ?
whole numbers
damn
im from India and over here we have NCERT
which is like the govt regulated book
and it says 0 isnt so yeah
I see...but that is not a big deal .. if it can create some issue, just add a little remark at the beginning of your exercise where you specify that 0 is or isn't inside N
i think maybe its like country to country thing
Closed by @thick hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
f(x)= |5−2x| +3
for 2<=x<=8 Find the range of function f.
guys, is the answer 4<=x<=14?
How did you get there?
also your range should be y not x
oh wait yes i mean y
i substitute x = 2 and x = 8
that assumes though that your function is strictly monotonous
which it is not in that interval
ohh
is there a way where i can find the vertex beside drawing the graph?
can i do completing the square for modulus functions
i never heard of such thing
but what you can do is analyze how the transformations affected the vertex, starting with |x|
bacc (unhelpful)
is it translation by vector (2.5 , 3)?
yes
ohh okayokaayy
yes
so what's the actualy lowest range value
y = 3
ye
just on a note the transformations caused the function to be stricly decreaing between x=2 and x=2.5 and strictly increasing between x=2.5 and x=8
that knowing plugging in x=8 works for the upper bound
but I would never avoid graphing stuff
Closed by @real silo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what am I doing wrong?
i've got lambda 2 and 3
but I keep getting lambda 1 wrong
i got sqrt(2) / 2 instead of 1 / sqrt(2)
Those are the same
$\frac{\sqrt 2}{2} = \frac{\sqrt 2 \cdot \sqrt 2}{2 \cdot \sqrt 2} = \frac{2}{2 \sqrt 2} = \frac{1}{\sqrt 2}$
oh right
what's the trick with orthonormal vectors as well by the way
suppose we have an orthonormal set containing u_1, u_2 , u_3
and a vector a
if a is written in terms of the vectors in the orthonormal set, then this would be the result
@distant swan Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @distant swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I keep getting stuck and none of the roots i find are real
Let me grab scratch paper, but I think your partial derivatives are incorrect
Product rule.
lemme see
im still turning up the same partial derivative for x
oh i see now i flipped the sign on the partial derivative for y
.close
Closed by @austere jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would you get the orange area, but only the part of this area which is above x=0 ?
Top parabole: f(x):=20/3*x^2 -2*x +3/10
Bottom parabole: g(x):=-220/27*x^2 +14/3*x -9/20
A formula, explanation, "GeoGebra" formula, ... would be good. Whatever suits the answer best 👍
Thanks in advance
Integrate f(x)-g(x) from 0 to the point of intersection
You're probably right, but I have tried your idea and this was the result.
What exactly do you mean by "point of intersection"?
This is what i am trying to achieve. Getting the read marked area between the two functions above 0
Ahh, got it! Thank you
.close
Closed by @grave folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
Have a problem with the 3.2
(In english) draw the tangent to the curve … in … and … draw the curve between …
And …
what is the problem ?
All the question
For 1) ?
No for 2
For 1 have
F’(0)= 1
F’(π/4)= 2
Ok so y = 1 / cos x
When x = 0 or x = π / 4
what ?
Im not sure 😅
In 1 i found f’(x) = 1 / cos x
And y = f(x)
I dont know how to continu
ok so f'(x) = 1/cos^2(x)
Yes
not 1/cos(x)
Oh sorry i miss the ^2
Have 1
Yes
can u easily understand english ? or should i speak french ?
French is better
Ba pour les tangente je dois les tracer comment ducoup
tu connais la dérivée
Oui
c'est la tangente
en gros
d'abord tu regardes la valeur de f en 0, et en ce point, tu trace la tangente
ici en 0 c'est une pente de 1
Ah d’accord enfaite la j’ai obtenu la valeur de y a des coordonnées x
Donc quand x = π / 4 on a y =2
dis plutot f quand tu parles, c'est plus facile a comprendre
Ok mais c’est ca ?
surtout que la tu parlais de f' non ?
Oui
oui
C’est vrai que j’explique mal mes demande je pense
Merci de mavoir aider et davoir traduit en français 😅
t'as compris comment faire ?
Oui ca devrait etre bon
fais voir apres au cas ou
pour ?
Ba enfaite les tangente jai leurs coordonnés en 1 point mais comment on fait pour les tracer
en 0 par exemple
t'as f(0) = 0
et f'(0) = 1
donc pour la tangente en 0 tu fais un petit trait droit avec une pente de 1
et c'est tout, il faut pas tracer plus
la tangente elle est collée a la courbe donc pour savoir ou la placer tu calcule f en ce point
Closed by @silver sluice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello everyone
How did the ** * Z** become + Z + 1 / 2 ? I don't understand
(It's Algebra Topic)
That’s how the operation is defined
?? it's not multiplication
x * y = x+y+1/2
Didn’t say it was
How do you see that?
(this is what i mean btw)
so then since our operation is defined the way it is, the left hand side just turns into (green)+(orange)+1/2
which is what we get
x * y = x+y+1/2 right?
instead lets just say a*b=a+b+1/2, same thing
just so we dont mix up the variables
well what if a=x+y+1/2, and b is z
then a*b = a+b+1/2 = (x+y+1/2) + (z) + 1/2
Ok but then they are the ones who present the exercise badly? Because they use the same variables
the exercise is presented just fine, im using the a and b values to explain it to you
(x+y+1/2) is treated as a whole number, just as it should b
it looks like a whole expression because we are so used to the traditional definitons of the + and * signs (and the other ones, of course) but when you define a new operation you have to keep in mind that the same rules dont apply
(x+y+1/2) * (z) in this context is just (x+y+1/2) + z + 1/2, since thats how we defined the * operation
If it's easier for you, you can think of an operation as a function
x#y = f(x,y) = x + y + 1/2
(x#y)#z = f(f(x,y),z) = f(x+y+1/2,z) = x + y + 1/2 + z +1/2
where # is *
@old blaze Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is the Laplacian of a field represented in a matrix, instead of a vector-of-vectors (no, they're not the same)?\
A matrix $M$ is equivalently a vector-of-covectors, $(M_\mu)^\nu$, and a covector-of-vectors, $(M^\nu)\mu$. The Laplacian, $L$, is a "vector-of-vectors", where each component is the second order differential of the field.
$$L{\mu,\nu} = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^\mu \partial x^\nu}$$
So why do we write it in a matrix?
$$L = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_1^2} & \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_2 \partial x_1} & \dots \ \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_1 \partial x_2} & \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_2^2} & \dots \ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots \end{pmatrix} \qquad\mbox{giving}\qquad L_\mu^\nu = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^\mu \partial x^\nu}$$
Shuba
@placid oak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The solution is the one that’s typed. My work is handwritten. Could someone please tell me what I’m doing wrong so far to get the incorrect determinant?
have you checked if your inverse is actually an inverse?
nvm i think the problem is in your determinant calculation
i got -1/4
try to do the determinant calculation again
lets go to your determinant calculation
you write down the three 2x2 matrices
and their factors in the first row
what is the value you get from the first one of those?
-1/4
i mean with the factor included
Oh dang
It should have been -1/8
no
1/8?
$-\frac{1}{2} \det \left( \begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{2} & 0 \ \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} \end{bmatrix} \right) $
Katharine
what a terrible formatting job texit has done
jeez
anyway
yes for 2x2
ad - bc
so the correct answer is 1/8
as you said with a question mark
now second one
for the second one?
you got it though
I crossed it out rather than writing it down
1/8 - 3/8 is correct
the way they did it is using the fact that the determinant of a matrix is the multiplication of the determinants of the factors
so
$\det(ABC) = \det(A) \det(B) \det(C)$
Katharine
and using the fact that the determinant of I is 1
What does that mean?
this
What is our ABC?
$A A^{-1} = I$
Katharine
Katharine
$\det(A) \det(A^{-1}) = \det(I)$
Katharine
$-4 \det(A^{-1}) = 1$
Katharine
$\det(A^{-1}) = -\frac{1}{4}$
Katharine
What is A, B, and C tho?
How are we multiplying determinants together?
what do you mean
Here: #help-28 message
Do you know about $f : A \rightarrow B$?
Katharine
it's a way of writing down functions
Oh because A is the input and B is the output?
yes
basically
the details aren't important
what i want to say is
you can see determinant as a function
$\det : \mathbb{R}^{n \times n} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$
Katharine
what this means is
it's a function that takes as input
a matrix
nxn
3x3 if you choose
2x2
and gives out a real number
just a value
and so
multiplying determinants
is just like multiplying real numbers
Oh ok. Thank you for your help! Do you mind if I send you a friend request?
you can ping me on here if you'd like
I'm going to try another problem
Could you please help me with problem (iii)? @thin flint
Idk where to start
@compact sail Has your question been resolved?
@compact sail Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey can someone please help with this lin lag problem
i tried setting up a system of equations to determine what row operations are needed
to achieve the shown matrix
this solution feels ridiculous though
@karmic vapor Has your question been resolved?
@karmic vapor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @karmic vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think this may be an issue with the question, becuase as far as I can tell it's already a single logarithm. Answers I attempted were the original given log and moving the negative sign into the log making it log_b(7^(-1)).
I thought maybe it could be that it meant to ask for an expanded log and I got a little tripped up, because I'm shaky on how to use the quotient rule if there's a negative in front of the initial log
yeah, i tried that
so it’s not logb(7)?
glad i could help
Closed by @gleaming ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Estimate the value of f'(50)
Closed by @south bay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i translate this to an inequality statement?
@versed light Has your question been resolved?
did you send anything?
this
@versed light Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @versed light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with solving linear and polynomial inequalities
like whats the goal in the end of the process and what is the process
like what am i supposed to do
can you show what you’re struggling with
for inequalities you are usually supposed to isolate x
like equations
i cant show photo but i can type out the equation if thats okay with you
sure
x^3-x^2-3x+3>-x^3+2x+5
the ^ means its an exponent
im lowkey gonna fail functions 12 because my mind goes blank whenever i see stuff like that
its mostly to factorize
might help make it > 0
@dreamy vector Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you properly prove that the suprema of x^2<2, x in the reals is sqrt 2 ?
by definition (sqrt(2))^2 = 2
but how do you prove that is the suprema?
ig how do you prove anything is a suprema?
Use the definition
consider the criteria for a suprema
the suprema has to be a number that is an upper bound
and it must be less than all other upper bounds
You know that x^2 < 2 is equivalent to -sqrt 2 < x < sqrt 2, then use the definition
Infact you can show that any interval of the form (a,b) has sup = b
Even if the interval is intersected with rationals points
The sup is by definition a real number
right
The subtlety here is if sqrt 2 even exists and if it’s really equal to the sup, which depending on the level of rigor can be taken for granted if you want
@fast marlin Has your question been resolved?
Thoughts?
i think 2 could be more concise i kinda changed what i was going to do while writing
i def didnt need to expand out the square
Not clear whats going in 2), e.g. what’s stopping epsilon of being bigger than sqrt 2? Then you can’t get the inequality you’re working with. Apart from that the inequality at the end is also quite confusing
@fast marlin Has your question been resolved?
Hint: points x in S is equivalent to the condition that -sqrt2 < x < sqrt2, since you’ve used the fact that sqrt2 exits
I.e you don’t really need to bother squaring
@fast marlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ARE MT ANSWERS CORRECT
just the diagrams
@tranquil spear Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil spear Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil spear Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@tranquil spear Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil spear Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am working on the following problem: Find a convex function $f:\mathbb R^n \to \overline \mathbb R$ such that $\partial f(0)=[1,2]^n$
ken
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Oops TeX didn't compile correctly, lemme fix
I am working on the following problem: Find a convex function $f:\mathbb R^n \to \overline {\mathbb R}$ such that $\partial f(0)=[1,2]^n$
ken
ken
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Here $\partial f(0)$ denotes the subdifferential of $f$.
ken
I know for other reasons that we have $\partial \lVert \cdot \lVert_1(0)$ is just the unit ball of the dual norm to $\lVert \cdot \lVert_1$, which happens to be $\lVert \cdot \rVert_\infty$. This gives us the hypercube $[-1,1]^n$. So morally, all we need to do is compose this with a linear transformation that transforms the unit cube $[-1,1]^n$ to $[1,2]^n$. I am trying to use the chain rule for subdifferentials to do this, but haven't been able to get it to work out correctly so far.
ken
Definition and possibly helpful chain rules for subdifferentials
I also solved this problem in the $n=1$ case. It is given by a piecewise function $$f(x)= \begin{cases} 2x, x \geq 0 \ x, x\leq 0. \end{cases}$$ Then our subgradient is just the collection of slopes of lines that lie below the graph of $f$. This is evidently $[1,2]$. However I can't see how to generalize this to higher dimensions.
ken
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
I'll restate the problem for clarity amongst the other messages: Find a convex function $f:\mathbb R^n \to \overline {\mathbb R}$ such that $\partial f(0)=[1,2]^n$.
ken
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help to start this off
u can use the identity: a² + b² = (a + bi)(a - bi)
yes
actually no
oops
but it is x^4 in original problem
oh wait really
yes
oh my bad im a dummy
well js do smt classic
Nvm that wont work too
Only choice is to use the identity a⁴ + b⁴ = (a² -sqrt(2)ab + b²)(a² + sqrt(2) + b²)
This was literally easier
This mean eacg factor is equal to 0
I know
and just find your 4 solutions
.close
Closed by @sharp stratus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so I'm trying to prove that every set of the form [a,b]. or (a,b) or [a,b) or (a,b] has a least upper bound
By definition it follows that for [a,b] and (a,b] b is the least upper bound
for (a,b) by definition it is the set of all elements strictly less than b, so the least upper bound must be eactly b
similarly for [a,b)
How do I formalise this further?
My definition of upper bound is an element is an upper bound of A if it's greater than or equal to every element of A
And of the least upper bound?
We haven't defined it in class, but I'd assume it's the least real number $M$ , such that $M \geq a \forall a \in A$
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
Sure
anything [strictly] less than, in this case, b, should not be an upper bound (which should be easy to formalise what not being an upper bound means)
(analogous statements for the [greatest] lower bound and all
)
so for half closed and closed sets the existance of a least upper bound is fairly easy to prove formally
but how do I formalise it for open sets
For where the end we're considering is "open", it's a tiny bit more work, but not the worst: prove that b is an upper bound (that one is immediate by definition), and prove that it's the least upper bound, so as before, anything [strictly] smaller than b is not an upper bound
In other words, if you have any c < b, you wanna find some x between a and b (exclusive) such that x > c
hmm
Could I have a hint
You may wanna consider the cases where c >= a, and where c < a 
(drawing a picture of those situations may be a bit enlightening as well!)
I'm just wondering If I'm overdoing it
because we used way simplier proofs by contradiction to prove that sets don't have lower or upper bounds
Eh, this is easier once proven tbh
So just to be clear , what I want to prove is
If there exists a $c \in \R$ such that $b>c implies $c \in [a,b)$
right
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
wait, I want $b$ to be the least upper bound
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
Isn't this trivial in the field R?
I want to prove if $c > x \forall x \in [a,b) \implies c \geq b$
Not with my form of the completeness axiom
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
It is much easier to show that anything strictly less than b is not an upper bound, than it is to show that any upper bound must be greater than b
hmm, okay
That's this statement here: any c that's less than b, our lub, is not an upper bound, so there must be an element of (a, b) that's strictly greater than c
Note that c itself needn't be in the interval (a, b) itself though, hence this hint (it just needs to be strictly less than b, it could also be strictly less than a as well, or not)
$ \forall c$ st $c<b$ . We now wish to show that there is an element $x\in (a,b)$, such that $x>c$
(and there do exist elements c that are strictly less than b, this is a forall proof)
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
Remember the epsilon-delta proofs and how they started? "let eps > 0 be arbitrary/given" or equivalent?
Similar here: let a c be given such that c < b. We now wish to show [what you said]
@thick hedge Has your question been resolved?
We first consider the case wherein a>c
In this case all elements of $(a,b)$ are greater than $c$ and we're done
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
but we know that $c< \frac{c+b}{2}<b$. and thus it lies in (a,b). This completes our proof
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
How is this @devout valley
Cool, give me an explicit one if you can 
But otherwise, I'm happy, if a <= c < b, choose x = (c + b)/2 and that's in the interval and strictly greater than c as we need 
. Didn't expect it to be this easy
And I suppose this "b" is what we call a limit point?
Yep, e.g. you can create a nonconstant sequence in the interval that converges to b 
sure $\frac{a+b}{2}$
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
Perfect 
Closed by @thick hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to prove that $\Z$ is not bounded below in $\R$
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
As proven earlier, every interval on $\R$ has a greatest lower bound. Let this lower bound be $\alpha$. $n \in \Z$ so $n\geq \alpha \forall n \in \Z$. But the integers are closed under subtraction. So $n-1 \geq \alpha ; \alpha \in \R $. so $n \geq \alpha +1$. But We've already established that $\alpha$ is the greatest lower bound. We've thus arrived at a contradiction , this $\Z$ doesn't have a lower bound in $\R$
is this fine?
Mr bean is not $\R \setminus \Q$
@thick hedge Has your question been resolved?
what's ur question?
proof looks fine to me
Closed by @thick hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yes
faiyrose
Root of is just the squared divided by 2
No?
I know the rules im just conufsed as if im suppose to root the numerator
Aswell
Beacause if so the answer is 1 and if not it should be -5.5
If im not missing something
So what i did was do the numerator first
Sqrt of that is 3 and 3.5
Added them so its 7.5
Then the top i js did the sqrt
3 then 1.5
So became 5a^1.5/ a^7.5
5 x 1.5 is 7.5
Use the rules
7.5 - 7.5
= 0
Anything up to 0 is 1
Is that correct?
How so
The numerator
(A^6)^1\2 equals 3
Yes
I know.
But its all the same base so it doesnt really matter until the answer
faiyrose
5a^3? What are u asking
no
ren
Shouldnt u do sqrt first then minus?
faiyrose
faiyrose
faiyrose
faiyrose
Yes i know but wouldnt the answer become different
faiyrose
3 and 3.5
faiyrose
Closed by @ivory lark
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can I find A^n ? A is not diagonalizable so I have no idea now
whats the charecteristic equation for this?
this
yesss
iok
write A-I=B
B^3=0 yeah?
(since (A-I)^3=0)
so
A^n= (B+I)^n
would u agree?
now binomial expand
A^n= I+nb+ (n)(n-1)/2 B^2 + b^3 +b^4 +...
since b^3 =0
they cancel out
so
A^n= I + nB +(n)(n-1)/2 B^2
but we dont know B
I got a pretty complicated result and I checked the soln, they used a different method idk
their answer is neater
@wanton comet do you understand this method maybe?
I dont quite get it
division algorthim
why did they do this
what is E
identity matrix
yeah you should get the same thign only
but why did they do this
because our method only works if (A-i)^3=0
u can use that anywhere
but its quite more annoying
wait
can you show the enetire thing
sadly it's a one-line hint
@rugged raft Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rugged raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
stat1
i dont
.close
Closed by @rugged raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
it does
.reopen
its 2^n
so like
u get
(1-2^4)(1+2^4) = 1-2^8
but
ur next thing is
(1+2^16)
?
2^(2^3) = 2^8
(1-1/2^2)(1+1/2^2) = 1 - 1/2^4
then * (1+1/2^4) which gives 1 - 1/2^8
then * (1 + 1/2^8)
etc
its 1+1/2^2^n
yes, so?
times 1 + 1/2^2^1
times 1 + 1/2^2^2
times 1 + 1/2^2^3
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
hello
Closed by @fathom trench
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
oh, arg z is the angle it makes with the positive real axis
like the usual angle in trig
the red angle theta
you want to find the maximum angle then for every point on the circle
also, tangents from the same point to the circle have the same length
so you could find the distance from (0, 6) to the origin
and it's the same over on the other point
for other circles you would just use Pythagoras given the distance from the centre to the circle
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @uncut wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(physics) Anyone know how you would calculate the error for values in a linear regression model? I have $D^2 vs. n$ in a graph, D has error, n has no error, I'm trying to get the error for the slope but dont want to use standard error cuz its too small 😭 and it doesn't take into account error in D.
Hemesfere
@proven warren Has your question been resolved?
@proven warren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please explain me how just considering the order of the first occurences of the numbers is enough for finding the required probability ?
Someone please help me with this problem . I have been wondering how this works from last couple of days 😭 😭
@glacial valve Has your question been resolved?
@glacial valve Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I have the equation $-\frac{b}{a}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{ka^2}{\omega^2a^3b^2-kb^2}$, how can I solve for the ratio b/a in terms of the constants k and omega
The د
You can factor in the denominator by b^2
ok
@stuck storm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think the answer is E i'm just not sure
explain your reasoning then
If you plug in 3 into both equations the answer comes out the same
oh
its only continous
bc when u differentiate u get 2 diff answers
do you?
how?
f is continuous at 3
its derivative is also continuous at 3
no issues
So the answer must be B then
You have to derivate both functions
Wait
Ur right
I'm pretty sure
I never said you were wrong, i just asked you to explain why you thought that
Yeah I realized that
continuous bc both functions have same value at x=3
