#help-28
1 messages · Page 184 of 1
no prob
it worked
@honest lark Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
two solutions
(0,0) and (sqrt(27), sqrt(27))
by symmetry of equations u can assume x = y then it becomes a quadratic
they look like ellipses
ah
it is (0,0) and ( 3, -3) acc to desmos
There are four solutions if you solve algebraically. I need to learn how to solve algrbraically because of exams
yeh u right i made a mistake
there are three intersections
(0,0) (0,sqrt(27/2)), (sqrt(27/2), 0) and (3,3)
(0,0) and (3,3) are right
move the radicals to one side and square the equation
how did you got 4 solutions there are only 3
sry
4 are there
there are 4 on the graph
my mistake
np i made mistake as well
x=0 solves the first equation
similarly y=0 solves the second
that's how you get (0,0)
ohh
yeah
i find smthng sussy that in second equation x is replaced by y with tespect to first eqn
is there something to it
@pliant dagger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Define the language SAT-2-CLAUSES:
SAT-2-CLAUSES = { ⟨𝜙⟩ | 𝜙 is a CNF formula with exactly two clauses, which has a satisfying assignment }.
Prove that SAT-2-CLAUSES ∈ P.
I get that the complexity is O(n*2^n) (n is the amount of unique variables). This is exponential, and thus not in P. However, my friend says it's O(2n) and thus is in P. What's the correct solution here?
why?
wdym why
ain't nothing but a heartbreak
@magic glade Has your question been resolved?
@magic glade Has your question been resolved?
you don’t need to check all the different arrangements for assignments of truth values to the variables
and even if you literally did the naive thing it still wouldn’t be n*2^n
@magic glade Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @magic glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
Just ask
ok so we have a number lets say we have N = 111...1 (n times)
or 22..2 or anything n times
Mhm
!da2a
ok for the 1st example i found out that 1111...1 = 1+10^2+10^3+......+10^n
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Ok
so is there any explanation for that like a general rule that explains this
Wdym general rule?
like what if we have 222222...2 or 333...3
Take 2(1111111.....)
something we can apply for all cases or is it for only one
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
So 2* that thing
hmmmmmm noice noice
soo is what i said true right?
Yes
Yes
r u sure
Yes
where ai is the ith digit
btw the end is n-1 not n
Yes
what
11 is also 10 + 1
do u even understand what i say
Yes
n-1 only
Np
.close
@hollow python Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if general form is when everything =0
why come i cant just take away y from both sides to get -1/2x+6-y=0
(i know you cant have fractions in general form is that why?)
@viral jasper how do i make it not a fraction then?
what do i do to get rid of the fration
Multiply everything by 2
so i want to turn the fraction into 1?
in this case -1
No
what did i do wrong
6 * 2 is not 6
0=-1x+12+2y
any hints?
oh just the 1?
would it be fine if i answered like "0=-x+12-2y"
or does the order mater
how do i know what a and b is
You compare directly
ohh based on what x and y is
A=-1 here because -x is -1 * x
@little owl Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @little owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if you multiply each length of a triangle by a positive number, will the new numbers still make a triangle?
yes, since all you need is the triangle inequality
that will create a similar triangle
the same or different positive numbers?
same
if c<b<a form a triangle then a<b+c, so kc<kb<ka also form a triangle since ka < k(b+c)
if it was a right angle, would the new lengths also make a right angle?
yes
you'd get a similar triangle every time
Closed by @wheat garden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when i have abs(5x-40) < 1
yeah
explain your thinking
no
uh nvm
whenevr i have absvaluex < 1
i just put it to -1<x<1
ok, what do you get on the left side
39/5
It’s ok, it happens
👍
nvm i forgot to multiply 8 by 5
Remember you need to set x = 39/5 and x = 41/5 in the original series, and see what happens there - you've only found the radius of convergence so far!
yeah the root or ratio test is always inconclusive at the end points
yup i just did 5(x-8) and i forgot to multoiply 8
oh but for the absolute value
abs(5x-40) < 1
ik i can do it by putting it as 1< (5x-40) < 1
but im not too sure why
-1 as the left
And e.g. remember that when x is positive, |x| = x, so |x| < 1 is saying x < 1, but when x is negative, |x| = -x, so |x| < 1 is saying -x < 1, equivalently, x > -1, but you need both of those statements true
(also the testing endpoints is pretty important - you know you definitely converge when |5(x - 8)| < 1, and you definitely diverge when |5(x - 8)| > 1, but you have absolutely no idea if you converge or diverge when |5(x - 8)| = 1 - see here, which is the reason they include 7.8 but not 8.2, after all!)
ahhhtysm!
.close
Closed by @hollow summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please explain this statement to me? "For two matrices A and B, each column of AB is a linear combination of the columns of A using weights from the corresponding column of B"
How I'm thinking it actually should be is each column of AB is a linear combination of the columns of B using weights from the corresponding row of A.. isn't that what we're doing?
\begin{bmatrix} a & b \ c & d \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} e & f \ g & h \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} ae + bg & af + bh \ ce + dg & cf + dh \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} a \begin{pmatrix} e \ g \end{pmatrix} + b \begin{pmatrix} f \ h \end{pmatrix} & c \begin{pmatrix} e \ g \end{pmatrix} + d \begin{pmatrix} f \ h \end{pmatrix} \end{bmatrix}
cloud
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
messed that one up a bit, sorry
you mean $\begin{bmatrix} a & b \ c & d \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} e & f \ g & h \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} ae + bg & af + bh \ ce + dg & cf + dh \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} e \begin{pmatrix} a \ c \end{pmatrix} + g \begin{pmatrix} b \ d \end{pmatrix} & f \begin{pmatrix} a \ c \end{pmatrix} + h \begin{pmatrix} b \ d \end{pmatrix} \end{bmatrix}$
rafilou2003
yeah
yep, columns of AB are weighted sums of columns of A
the weights are given by the corresponding column of B
okay when you list it out like this it makes sense ig i'm just having trouble gaining an intuitive understanding of this
if you multiply Ax where x is a column vector, then the resulting vector is a linear combination of the columns of a with the entries of x as weights:
then AB simply extends that to more columns, since each column of AB is the result of multiplying A by one of the column vectors of B
Closed by @ruby raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@dusty kayak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me figure out what I should do here? Not sure what cot(A) should be, confused about the angle terminating in the 4th quadrant part.
the quadrant tells you what the sign of tan(A) should be
Quadrant 4 is positive cos and negative sin, so tan(a) is negative right?
yes
But then isn't cot(A)=-3/sqrt(7)?
That's not an option up there
Oh wait...the 1st one is equivalent to that
K, ty!
.close
Closed by @viral onyx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Since, sec A is positive thus, A is in the 4th quadrant
@deep bolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the best formula for aproximating the circumference of an elipse? I need precision for my project
@drifting bronze Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
what is wrong with khan academy
17/7 = 2.42
but it said 2.42 is wrong lol
unbelivable man
yea it is
2.42857...
2.42857142857 this is the exact value
lol
Is not the same
well you know its an acceptable answer
to give an aswer to three decimal places
cause its obvious
Acceptable depends on the context
thats so dumb man
ur not being helfpul
🤦♂️
im just gonna use thewiseai and cheat now
If the question asks you to lake an approximation then it is ok
can you write 17/7 as answer?
If they want the exact solution
You let it as 17/7
You need to understand what = means
i love cheating with thewiseai
yknow just typing 17/7 is easier than calculating the decimals
ik
so did you do it?
then why waste time?
thewiseai?
i need help
are you talking about chatgpt?
$= \neq \approx$
Samuel
not at all
no, it isn't.
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
What is your point?
so you are saying its not accurate yet u dont even know what it is
yet
im the one who uses it and has experience with it
is it your word against mine
the person who has used it before vs the person who does not know what it is
ai is not trustworthy
This is not related with the question anymore
give it any precalculus calculus question it will probably help you out
what makes you think I haven't used it?
For discuss this go to #discussion or #chill
indicating you dont know what it is
because you wrote that...
why did u put the question mark at the end
close this channel if there's no question
,calc 17/7
Result:
2.4285714285714
the literal website says that its not very accurate
hey after how long inactivity channel closes automatically ?
any AI that's not made specifically for math shouldn't be used for it
i see
show us this geometry problem
yeah, and stop refusing the things people are saying to you on a server that's literally dedicated for math.
nobody will help you with that attitude lmao
its like rotation to -270 degrees reflected over point B translated up 5 units on the reflection x perpendicular to line segment ab to ac
its like reading chinese i dont understand any of it
and i dont really understand anything about rotation or how the shape is suppose to move
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
first show the question^^
i dont understand the definitions
like the reading comphrension
it confuses me
i dont understand anything i cant visualize it
Try drawing it
ok
@trail salmon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
chat how do i solve for x
is this a joke?
no
holy fuck (25°)^3
Its pretty simple ngl
am i reading it correctly?
It just looks complex
yes
Then what the - is this supposed to mean
i think its +
Anyway, square both sides twice, (120/5!)^256 = 1
is this under the double square root
So 256x/4
Yes
And this is just fancy (4x^2+256)^(1/4)
I discovered it just today
Yes lol
What
why are we even solving roblox problems
It is a robloxmhame
double square root
256x/4
is that right
for the left
ok it is
what do i do for the right
oh true ture
wt about the double square root
Double square on both sides
(The quadratic equations were a pain in the ass)
$\sqrt{\sqrt{\frac{256x}{4}}}=\sqrt{\sqrt{\frac{4x^{2}+256}{1}}}$
water beam
is that it
answers -8 mate
How was this even solved?
Play roblox
Solve math
Tf us this solve roblox
cant believe i did this bs
Nop x cant be negative
What's the (25°)^3?
25^0 lol
oh wait yeah im tweaking
Ie 1
LMAO
25 degrees would be cursed
25 degrees
What
U just cant add angles to numbers
That ain't degrees
Its illegal
It is 25^0
Ye
its roblox anything is possible 🔥
Lol
I can't believe people are solving math problems just because of roblox
Lol
at least it is not calculus
on god i was bored and saw this game called math problems or something
so i was like
aight
anyways gg chat
What out for the matrix questions
highly addictive and dangerous
Watch*
Lol
there are matrices???
2nd and 3rd from the last
In extreme level
i havent learnt matrices yet
Very lengthy
is there calculus pls say there is calc
use ,w
OH YEAH
facts
i dont know how to do a matrix calculation on wolfram tho what do i write
no idea
imagine putting the unsolvable problem in the game just to see how kids solve the problem. I think it is time to learn how to make roblox map
Lol
and get a free $1M
cheapest work force
we can says spend $100 for their robux reward
and you can even make them pay for hints and materials for studying
ez money
most of the players are like 8th 9th grade so matrices are just rude
No
you say matrix is rude but not calculus?
As method has said
Questions are just fancy
Except for the quadratic equations
True pain
I know the right term is just 1
but what do i do with log base x
is that a change of base
im guessing it is
log(1000)/log(x)
oh
3/log(x)
Base of a log can't be 1
@devout valley LMAO
Wait is this also roblox or no?
and log(x^2) = 2log(x)
yep
yes 💀
it looks quadratic
first ask roblox question then put the real homework question in. that's actually clever way to get the solution lol
nah this is in game
I'm just joking lol. but imagine tho
what do i do with $\frac{\log\left(1000\right)}{\log x}-2\log\left(x\right)+1=0$
water beam
should i get a common denominator
log(1000) = 3
Wait someone asked this question yesterday lol
oh
and then multiply by log x
ok
and it will be quadratic
then do some magic and youll get the roots
maybe sub u = logx if you dont see how it's quadratic
i think it is
wait no hmm
im getting jipped
ohh
Oh it is 31.623, sqrt(1000)
No I am just referring to the questions
sqrt1000 isnt working either that sweird
Sometimes it's in decimals sometimes in fractions
3/2 is the solution of quadratic, so 10^3/2 is the solution
is it decadic logarithm?
log(x^2)
or is it base e
apparently it was 0.1
i beat this game n sqrt1000 didnt work
im on extreme level now
What the fuck
That's the 2nd solution..
log(x) = -1
so x = 10^(-1)
yep gg
idk it was like that for another quadratic question before they only accepted negative solution for some reason
not expression
poor map creator
like webwork?
and then point people to the roblox map instead of khan academy
am i supposed to solve for x
exactly
Khan academy is kinda slow ngl
looks fine
Take 4 combiinations
Try -0.8
theres only 3
oh i think it wants me to add both solutions from the negative and positive cuz its an absolute value
it has nothing to do with the fact that its absolute value
x<-5/3, -5/3<=x<3/2 , x >= 3/2
at least i hope so
yeah, you can write absolute value as |x| = -x, x for different value of x
one condition is collapsable
yeah
nah
I already solved it :/
ok bro
Well then I claim there are only 2 combinations
It has 4 combinations
like, it should be obvious that if 3x + 5 < 0, you can also infers to 2x - 3
therefore, you can reduce it down to 3 conditons for example
There are only 2 combinations because it should be obvious that there are no solutions where -5/3 < x < 3/2
yeah, you can keep reduce it down
Actually, there is just 1 combination
that doesnt mean -5/3<x<3/2 is nonexistent
this game is cooked
because its obvious that if x>3/2 then the only solution is x = 4.6
Wait no, there is 0 combinations
because if x<-5/3, then its straightforward to see that x = -5.4 is the only solution
Wait no, there are negative 1 combinations
💀
another simple way to solve this is to solve
$\sqrt{(2x-3)^2} + \sqrt{(3x+5)^2} = 25$ and you should get 2 equations: for positive x and negative x
print("NAME")
@torn jolt u said matrix question was very last?
oh true
2nd and 3rd from last
oh god
The last one is logs ig
it is quite easy tbh because $\text{det}(aX) = a^nX$ for $X\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$
print("NAME")
i dont know what any of that means 🤣
@devout valley maybe i should take u up on that offer 
how you gonna solve that?
well, I can say that inside is positive and remove the square root
Told ya 
I can also say that inside is negative and remove the square root
teach me the ways 🙏
That's the point for solving the equation
then whats the point of changing it to sqrt(x²) form
because now if I know that x is positive, then sqrt(x^2) = x
What's the point of changing x + 1 = 2 to x = 1 when they are essentially the same thing?
no absolute value
??
the same applies to absolute values
|x| = x when x>0
yes...
|x| = -x when x<0
but now you have 2 equations instead of consider for each cases
I think it is trivial to expand that no? you will have 2 linear equations
sum it up
done
huh
because again, if you know one is positive for example, you also know the bound for another term
says if x is positive, I can say rightaway that 5x = 23
and if it is negative, I can say rightaway that 5x = -27
?
that's the point for writing it this way
what if the positive number is less than 3/2
im cooked i cant do LA
but im leeching off of this other guy
then what?
LA?
linear algebra
Oh
,w 25(3x - 24)^-1 (20 + 6) = 5
you cant just say if x is positive then 2x-3 >0
but first I say that (2x-3) > 0 then I can say that x > 0 for example...
not exactly but you see my point
like x > something, 3/2 here for example
dude. I see no point argue about this. If x > 0 then
|3-2x| + 3x = 20, agree?
and |2x-3| + 3x + 5 = 25 agree?
(same thing anyways)
then you still have to solve for more than 2 cases??
as I note, those two equations are equivalent
so, I end up with 2. for x > 0 and x < 0
you have to solve for 0<x<3/2 and x>=3/2 there + you have to consider when x<0
so what?
so more than 2 cases
my point is 2 equations
I just don't understand why you want to win this argument so much
u still have to consider the absolute value
in those 2 equations
I always say 2 equations. not 2 cases
its 4 then
aight thats what i thought
can we now talk about roblox?
yeah, reportable image
You got past the matrices ?
i leeched off of some other guy to do them 🤣
matrix question is essentially linear equation
Oh
there was a final summation question which was so dumb
i put it in my calculator and it froze it 💀
det(5A^(-1)B') = 5^2(1/det(A))det(B), det(A) = 3x - 24 and det(B) = 26.
just plug it in, solve for x, done.
.
👑 wolfram
yeah, that equation is essentially it
You finished it already?
yes it was a combination of getting the more intelligent players to do it for us and then also my calculator
lol
seems too easy. let's make something harder
"Jump in intervals, such that you type out proof of the fermat's last theorem in morse code"
charrrt lurking
well, I can think of a question like $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}} ; dx$ or other PDF kernel to make life of people who never learn probability at college level before suffer
print("NAME")
it is still calculus. but hell you don't want to do by-part or things like that. Like, imagine beta density
we'll get them to integrate e^x^2 from -inf to inf using polar coordinates
I mean, why bother? We know that $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}} ; dx = 1$
print("NAME")
then you can just multiply by $\sqrt{2\pi}$ and done, get the answer
print("NAME")
we'll say thats cheating and they have to pretend they dont know that
and that is what make this evil 
Closed by @twin wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
dk how to approach it at all new to these comp math type questions
@hot elm Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Hello
hi
Is the question talking about there being two different digits in both?
im assuming it just gotta add up to 999
I think we gotta consider both of the distances
cuz both of them together consist of a road sign
aight
soo, there are a total of 90 possible combination of digits.
so if we consider a general case, except 0. calculate the possibilities and check the cases for 0 separately.
not sure tho, I'm suggesting these just from the top of my head. I haven't thought much of it
alright
would this be combinatorics?
Closed by @hot elm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can i prove that the length of the skewed line is 5,2m
This should be a better pic i think
<@&286206848099549185>
pythagorean theorem
Oh
Closed by @vapid night
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i made everything sin
but the solution uses tan
and i got different values
for my answers
i wanna know if i will still get marks in my exam
U r supposed to get different values?
I dont see why u shouldnt get marks
Wait, lemme see
wdym made everything sin 
5sin(x) - 2cos(x) = 3sin(x)
5sin(x) - 2(1-sin(x)) = 3sin(x)
5sin(x) - 2 + 2sin (x) = 3sinx
3sin(x) = 2
then solve from there
Hey... Cot(x) = 4.. It cant happen?
it's sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1
ohhh ok
i haven't learnt that yet lol
Nah, i was wrong, cot(x)=1
wait but if u square root both sides does it not just make the identity sin(x) + cos(x) = 1
why doesnt that work?
If im not wrong, theta=45°,225°
Great, i still have my sanity
I thought i lost my meth ability after the social science exam
i have my end of year exams soon so i'm tryna just perfect everything rn
Cool
The solution btw
is it not just simpler to just use tan?
Ah.. How?
I found it as the simplest path
yeah i sometimes forget how u can just pull out stuff for the fun of it
So, ur problem solved?
.close
.close
Closed by @granite elk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
that is not what you get when you square root both sides is why
(a+b)^2 is not equal to a^2 + b^2
root (a+b)^2 = a+b
root (a^2+b^2) is sometehing else
oh ok i see
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The digits of a four-digit positive integer add up to 14. The sum of the two middle digits is nine, and the thousands digit minus the units digit is one. If the integer is divisible by 11, what is the integer?
You on fire today my guy
so suppose our number is abcd
then a + b + c + d = 14
now write the other conditions like this
yes
the last bit might be a bit tricky though, but it's also really simple
abcd | 11
Well rewrite abcd in a more convenient way
(1000a + 100b+ 10c + 1d )| 11
okay
a + b + c + d = 14
b + c = 9
a - d = 1
1000a + 100b + 10c + d = 11 * k
so you got this
there's actually a divisibility rule for 11 that won't involve k but i personally have never heard of it
yeah there is but not sure if op is familiar with it
I'm fairly sure we can solve this without it
Not true
There are divisibility rules for all primes
But after 11 it gets quite crappy
One way to solve this now is to solve the system with k as a paremeter
as in, get a, b, c and d in function of k
and then vary k and test what works
though that may be quite tedious
You'd only have to vary k for values that make a in the range of 1 to 9
so you'd probably just have to check 9 values of k or so
you can solve for a and d easily from these and only then start involving k for b and c
You can modify $1000a+100b+10c+d=11k$ to:
$\newline (11-1)^3a+(11-1)^2b+(11-1)c+d=11k \newline $. Expanding gives:
$-a+b-c+d=11(\text{some integer})=11k$
That's some galaxy brain moves right there
quickdoom
and also since b+c is a constant and they are digits it will be very easy to just brute force
very nice
Its actually just deriving the divisibility rule for 11
yeah basically
And since a,b,c,d come from 0 to 9, you only need to test k=0,1 and -1
Proof by exhaustion, my favourite
I believe this should greatly reduce the working required and atleast make it manageable
Plug in the second equation into the first one
That simplifies things a lot
Or rather, solves half the problem
cause then the first and third equation can be solved for a and d
a + b + c + d = 14
b + c = 9
a - d = 1
1000a + 100b + 10c + d = 11 * k
which one
and then you substitute b from the second one and plug all that into the fourth to solve for c
or b
look at these two
a + b + c + d = 14
b + c = 9
by plugging in the second into the first we get
a + 9 + d = 14
a + d = 5
this is not the way
is it not?
this i mean is not* what ur saying is fine
Show me da wae
first thing to this problem is realize b + c = 9 implies a + d = 5 which u did
Anyway, by observing the new equation
a + d = 5
with the third one
a - d = 1
ye that
we can solve for a and d
we get a = 3 and d = 2
From there on we have :
b + c = 9
3000 + 100b + 10c + 2 = 11 k
now just solve for b and c and then vary k a bit to check around things
👀
Hm?
Im not sure how solving -3+b-c+2 =11k is not better than solving 3000+100b+10c+2=11k
sorry maybe i misread
I was just modifying what system they had arrived at to aid in the calculation
so anyway, b = 9 - c
3000 + 100 * (9-c) + 10c + 2 = 11 k
3000 + 900 - 100 c + 10 c + 2 = 11k
3902 - 90 c = 11k
90 c = 3902 - 11k
c = (3902 - 11k) / 90
We know c can only be from 1 to 9 so knowing that we vary k
to see what fits
Alternatively
express k
Again, you can save a lot of mess(and make the solution more ovvious) by using -3+b-c+2=11k, giving 8-2c=11k => (8-11k)/2=c, and the choice for k here should be pretty obvious (|| k=0 => c=4 and b=5 ||)
as (3902 - 90c) / 11
and vary c = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
and see for which ones you get a whole number k
and then use that k to get b
Ye, but that would involve the galaxy brain move, I wanted to show op how they could do it without it
,w Solve[{a + b + c + d == 14, b + c == 9, a - d == 1, 1000 a + 100 b + 10 c + d == 11 k}, {a, b, c, d, k}]
how do I check my answer?
Giving our desired 4 digit number ||3542||, and indeed it does satisfy all conditions
Yeah
c = 4 is the only one that gives k as a whole number
c = 4 therefore must be the solution for c
and then b = 5
so the number is 3542
Closed by @torpid perch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You need to be able to interpret the result. It is saying a=2 and c=9-b and d=2 and k= (90b+3092)/11. From here onward the solution has been continued here: #help-28 message
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone can help me w this derivative pls
Well yes but it simplifies even further
f(x)=2x.lnx-1/x
correct but not helpful
help pls....
2x/x = 2
ln[x^a] can be written as aln[x]
except when x=0 but that's usually not considered important enough to worry about for these problems
yes
^
and then u simplify again 2x/x to 2???
Yes
okay slay
and this do ı have to simplify it
or is it not necessary ln[x^a] can be written as aln[x]
I would
Np
.close
Closed by @foggy glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
triple lhopitals moment
$\tan\left(x\right)=\frac{\sin\left(x\right)}{\cos\left(x\right)}$
Combustion
$\frac{\tan\left(x\right)-\sin\left(x\right)}{x^{3}}=\frac{\frac{\sin\left(x\right)}{\cos\left(x\right)}-\sin\left(x\right)}{x^{3}}=\frac{\sin\left(x\right)-\cos\left(x\right)\sin\left(x\right)}{x^{3}\cos\left(x\right)}$
Combustion
$\frac{\sin\left(x\right)-\cos\left(x\right)\sin\left(x\right)}{x^{3}\cos\left(x\right)}=\frac{\sin\left(x\right)\left(1-\cos\left(x\right)\right)}{x^{3}\cos\left(x\right)}=\frac{\sin\left(x\right)\left(1-\cos\left(x\right)\right)\left(1+\cos\left(x\right)\right)}{x^{3}\cos\left(x\right)\left(1+\cos\left(x\right)\right)}$
Combustion
$\frac{\sin\left(x\right)\left(1-\cos\left(x\right)\right)\left(1+\cos\left(x\right)\right)}{x^{3}\cos\left(x\right)\left(1+\cos\left(x\right)\right)}=\frac{\sin\left(x\right)\left(\sin^{2}\left(x\right)\right)}{x^{3}\cos\left(x\right)\left(1+\cos\left(x\right)\right)}$
Combustion
$\left(\frac{\sin\left(x\right)}{x}\right)^{3}\left(\frac{1}{\cos\left(x\right)\left(1+\cos\left(x\right)\right)}\right)$


