#help-28
1 messages · Page 160 of 1
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
RS/20 = 80/40
yes
not only that part
is it cause it's one triangle split into 2?
kinda
just know that we are applying similarty critieras in triangle OPQ and ORS
Closed by @restive jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I would like some help with complex analysis
- Some details on Rouche's thm, and
- A question which I think is about uniqueness thm in particular
I'd like to first ask about Rouche's about the number of roots \
if $|f(z)| < |g(z)|$ for $z$ on a circle $C$, then we know the number of roots of $f+g$ in $C$ equals the number of roots of $g$ in $C$. \
Say $g$ has 1 distinct root of order 5 in $C$. Will $f+g$ have 1 or 5 roots in $C$?
Lemonsity
(you may want to ask this in #real-complex-analysis as well, if you haven't)
Thank you very much for the tip, I have but it got buried, so I figure it might be better to ask with a dedicated thread here
Ahh I see, yea you can ask here too, sometimes the advanced channels get buried and asking in these channels, sometimes people help out 
yup, a bit luck based
Hmm, I dug up Lang's Complex Analysis, and it seems to suggest that multiplicity have to be accounted
the example from Lang compared it with a function 5z^3
and then specifically mentioned that "you have to count multiplicity"
Was about to say that my notes derive Rouche from the Zero Counting Theorem, where [before they introduce them] you count the roots with their multiplicity
mine seems to be the same too
then that has to be the answer then
is your notes the "integration over f'/f"
Yea something like that, they basically show that the integral of (f + g)'/(f + g) is the same as the integral of f'/f at the last point
I see, our notes sounds very similar
Then it is solved
(In terms of server rule, should I open a different help channel for a different complex analysis problem?)
Well you can if you want, generally better as someone else might pick it up! (not sure if I'll be able to answer much other than reading my notes, kinda tired, though I will try take a look
)
If you are tired, then you should get some rest
Thanks for the confirmation and help
I will start a new channel
.close
Closed by @royal raptor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am having trouble interpreting the stokes theorem
It states that the flux of the curl of a field is equal to the field integrated over the boundary
But the word "boundary" is really ambigious. For example, if we consider a sphere which some electric field E, then I can take the flux of its curl and if stokes is correct it should be the same as integrating the field over the spheres boundary
But what exactly is supposed to be the boundary here?
The term boundary implies some sort of one dimensional path, I imagine it to be some sort of thin thread wrapping around a surface, basically what would be called as a perimeter
But it makes no sense to talk about the perimeter of a 3d object
How exactly do I imagine stokes theorem visually?
the sphere doesn't have a boundary because it's a closed surface, so the integral is zero
you can also view this by splitting the sphere into two hemispheres
then the boundaries form circles, but they are oriented in opposite directions
so applying stokes to both surfaces then combining them cancels them out, which also yields zero
normally, you apply stokes to non-closed surfaces (your intuition about a boundary being a path is correct, your example just happens to not have such a boundary)
@graceful yoke Has your question been resolved?
So is it always the case that the flux of curl will always be zero for a closed object?
And about cutting the sphere into two halves, doesn't the cancellation only occur because of the symmetry of the sphere? If I take some asymmetric object, can it still be proven that the flux of the curl will be zero?
it's true in general that the flux of a curl field across a closed surface is 0. the main thing is that if you split it then the boundary of each curve will be the same but with the opposite direction (since it only depends on the shape of the boundary, not the shape of the surface)
you can also prove it with the divergence theorem (along with the fact that the divergence of a curl field is 0)
the cancellation occurs because the two boundaries will be where you slice the closed surface in half
and the orientations will necessarily be opposite in that case
Another thing, if I take a hollow cone and then make a cut at the bottom of the cone such that the cross section is perpendicular to the height ofthe cone, then the cone now has two circles with different radius, which circle here will be the boundary now?
Also thanks for the insights, I really appreciate them
I don't work with integrals/manifolds much but I believe the boundary has to be at least connected and piecewise smooth
so your case of an annulus does not meet the hypotheses of stokes
let me check something
ah, okay
so you can basically do a similar thing to the sphere
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
and apply stokes to the resulting surface, and subtract that away from the total
Damn that closing one of the holes is a really clever idea, it does bring the problem of how we close it though, but I can sort of intuitively see it working
it doesn't really matter how you do it, because the boundary of the resulting surface is just the other part of the boundary we had in the first place
so if your boundary is a union A U B, close B and apply stokes to a surface with boundary A
then apply stokes to the surface you closed B with
and it doesn't matter what that surface is, since you know it has boundary B
Yes, the boundary doesn't change, but the surface area does change, which might change the flux
and stokes says that this isn't the case
stokes precisely says that the surface doesn't matter, only the boundary
Yeah I get it better now, thank you very much for the help 🙂
Thanks to @umbral dome too for the explaination
.close
Closed by @graceful yoke
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Part b how do I find the first quartile
@twin wolf Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Your drawing seems correct. There seems to be an issue with question
@tired sedge Has your question been resolved?
Okkkk
.close
Closed by @tired sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for this
is there a simpler way
then doing compelte teh square
then doing u sub twice to convert it in 1/(1+x^2) form
i feel like thats way too long
It's a very long question sadly
the part that pisses me off
is that this is 1 part of a larger integral
and i felt like i was doing it so wrong
cause theres no way this is right
I think you can get away with a complex factorization if you know your stuff, but that's a big ask
Yep that's pain.
so if theres a shortcut that doesnt create that monstrosity pls tell
this is alrd fairly simple isn't it?
u don't need to formally do u-sub
yeah but its 3 steps seperated from another integral
how then?
once u have 1/((x + 1/2)^2 + 3/4) u can immediately integrate using arctan formula
i dont know the formula
i only know 1/(1+x^2) = arctan
oh
is that how teh calculator did it
Try the u-sub:
3/4 (x + 1/2)² = u²
ok
Or, really, try it from
√[3/4] (x + 1/2) = u
imt rying toher one
But I hope the logic is clear on how I got this
yeah
im doing the bx+c part
ok very well
ok yeah tihs is way easier
got it
is sqrt(3)arctan(sqrt(3/4)(x+1/2)) correct
i dont know if this is equivalant
close enough
@ancient wyvern Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ancient wyvern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A customer survey indicates that for each $1.20 decrease in price, sales will increase by 6 pails of paint
alr gimme 1 sec to solve
ok
ok im not entirely sure what its asking but * ** i tihnk ** *its c
we're looking for r(x) = x*p(x)
right then i think its d but im really tired so i wouldnt trust me rn but i think its that
sorry
i honestly dont know man
u have to solve all of them
im just being stupid and dumb
alr 😂
@hoary surge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@hoary surge Has your question been resolved?
@hoary surge Has your question been resolved?
hello
@hoary surge can i try?
is this economics qn?
thats out of my league bro
but i can try to think from a maths perspective
Yes
lol
i know functions but no dice abt eco
the first one is a linear function right?
can you help me a bit here
what price function is asked?
like if you elaborate
a bit
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
quick help please
how to do this
from h/2(E + 2M)
since i did 0.5 * (1 + 1/1.5 + 2(1/1.25)) = 1.6333
please @ me reply so i see
howd u do this one, desperate exam tmr 💀, how come int4,2(9x+15)/(x-1)(x-3) = 3int(4,2(3x+5)/(x-2)(x+3)
how does the 2/x-1 relate to this at all
Please answer all, I'll come back and read them so Ty 🙂
Plz
@sly solstice Has your question been resolved?
we arent allowed to straight up give you answers
trapezium rule just apply the formula
looked at what they've given you and what they are asking you to find
can you see any similarities?
maybe multiplying by something
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how i do dis
do you know pigeonhole principle?
hmm
kind of?
i know that
i rmb my teacher saying
for n people, there is n-1 handshakes
the pigeon hole is the boxes and the crayons are the pigeons?
@vivid berry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so far this is my attempt for the question, please let me know if I am doing it right (context: renewal processes)
@proven badger Has your question been resolved?
@proven badger Has your question been resolved?
ye
update: 340 was marked as incorrect 😦
@proven badger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for trig substitution here
how do we transform this into x
like x^2-a^2 but theres a 16
well you could factor out the 16
or you can incorporate it into the ²
since 4² = 16
16x² = (4x)²
which then lets you do tan sub
@hollow summit
yes ill try to do that
Don't complicate things. Change 16x^2 to 9u^2 if that's your goal.
is x 3sec dx 3sectan
yeah thats what i did
@hollow summit Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain set classes to me? I’m having a little trouble getting the concept
what's that
Not entirely sure myself
Here is the footnote from Apostol’s book explaining them. I sorta understand the operations on them, but not the classes themselves. Would their sets not just be subsets of the class?
,rccw
@cunning ravine Has your question been resolved?
@cunning ravine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@cunning ravine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For 58, would this be as simple as 4 * 4 (4 aces in each deck) or would I need to find the probability of getting an ace from both deck?
the first, it's not asking about probability just the number of hands
thank you!
.close
Closed by @loud hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could anyone help with this?
what are you struggling with
honestly just wanted someone to check if am on right track
then send your work
Thoughts?
i dont know what most of these groups are, but i think you have the right idea
@stiff wagon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A set of 12 different types of fruit are sitting on a table. In how many ways can you select at least two of he fruit to eat.
you can use formula for choosing r from n objects
nCr = n! / r!(n-r)!
so it'll be 12C2 + 12C3 + 12C4 + ... + 12C11 + 12C12
Is there any faster way
Are you doing this by hand or with a calculator?
Calculator
rn im doing it on calculator but
on test im not sure cuz there might be a non calc portion
Doing factorials by hand sucks.. but you'll have scratch paper, so...
When you start your test, do a quick data dump of your factorials, up to.. whatever you think you might encounter.. 12 or 15 or so
21
Just find complement
I mean.. taking factorial much past 10, by hand?
@knotty musk Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @knotty musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me find the surface area for this
@quaint bolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @quaint bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I tell the things below to be in mathematical notation or whatever you call it
M and/or n is a positive odd integer
u mean like
set builder form?
the exact language you could use depends on the context
tho what im talking abt is just 2n+1 where n belongs to whole numbers
thats what he means probably
by mathematical notation
the prose kinda depends on if M and n have already been introduced and their purpose
and if you’re trying to say at least one of them is a positive odd integer, they should already have been introduced
so then i would like to know what they were introduced as
before i give any suggestions
@silk lake Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In △ABC, AB = 3, BC = 6, CA = 5, AD is the bisector, E is the midpoint of the segment BD s, i I is the center of the inscribed circle. If IE ∩ AC = {F}, find out the value of the ratio CF/ FA
@sacred agate Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sacred agate Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sacred agate Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sacred agate Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sacred agate Has your question been resolved?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
ItzJezze
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
I don’t think your cf definition is correct
What do you mean?
Cf is on ac not bc, so cf ≠ bc - ec
Now I see it, thanks for pointing it out! So I'm guessing that, without additional information about the exact location of ( F ) on ( AC ), we cannot determine ( CF ) and ( FA ) precisely?
No you can
...how?
And also, I really appreciate your efforts. Thanks a lot man
Huh, I don’t get it. Would you care to demonstrate?
You can use law of cos and the lengths of AB, BD, and BE to fully identify ABI, and use the interior angles to find m<BIE with that and ACI, find FIA and solve FC/FA
@sacred agate Has your question been resolved?
I think that works? Although I'd rather have a synthetic solve rather than an algebric one
Closed by @sacred agate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
smh the gpt response
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello can anyone solve this?
assume point C to be h,k
find relation between h and k using area of triangle formula
and then find centroid p, in terms of h and k
didnt understand this step
if possible can you solve and show so i understand?
@hard eagle Has your question been resolved?
@hard eagle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey I ned to confirm a few things about cross products
so If I have two vectors A and B,
A = <bi, cj, dk>
B = <fi, gj, hk>
(I'm reserving a and e for the real component of a quaternion)
Well I guess that should be the first thing: the i, j, and k in our vectros reference the i, j, and k in quaternions, right?
as in if we pared off the real component from a quaternion to make it a 3d vector, the math would be the same right?
ij=k
ji=-k
ijk = -1
i^2=j^2=k^2 = -1
and all that?
@pale otter Has your question been resolved?
no
@pale otter Has your question been resolved?
no
Wsg guys. I'm tryna get the correct answer to this question but I don't get it. It says I have to find the area of this figure. Can anyone help me by chance?
<@&286206848099549185>
D
How?
@pale otter Has your question been resolved?
no but i'll give up the channel ig
Closed by @pale otter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
9 distinct balls are to be distirbuted in 4 boxes: B1, B2, B3, B4
what is the probability that B3 contains exactly 3 balls?
my first approach is to think of it as a multinomial expansion:
(B1+B2+B3+B4)^9
and find all the terms that have (b3)^3
however, multinomial theorem has been removed from the course and I'm doing an old question, so I have no idea how to find the sum of the required coefficients
theres an easy way to think about it. If B3 has 3 balls, then theres 6 balls to be distributed across B1, B2, and B3
Find how many possibilities there are for this, and subtract it from the total number of possibilities
oh yeah, we can find the number of ways by which we can distribute 6 balls among b1, b2 and b3 and subtract it from the total possibilities?
oki
6*
6 mb
yep
this is a moderately difficult problem but since ur in a combinatorics course I assume you'll be able to do it pretty easily
oh am not in a course, am in grade 12th
this may need beggars method tho.. there might be some other way too
Closed by @autumn kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I start number 19
What is the anti derivative of 3x
Oh you don’t even need to solve
Ok what does the graph of 3x look like
Just a line going upwards from the origin right
that would tell you area
From there you find the difference between plugging in 1 and 0 for x
But it looks like your book doesn’t even make you find the area
It just wants the shape
This is that
The area under the curve, which in this case is just a line, will just be a triangle
🙏
.close
Closed by @oak otter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
i dont know where to begin
well you know that it's a circle, so the radius must be the same throughout
yep
can you find something with that information?
no
obtuse angled triangled
but how will that tell me angles
should i tell you what the triangle is
yes
40
the interior angles of a triangle should always add upto 180
correct
this not even in my syllabus why they give this 🥺💔
exercise name ?
angle in a segment of a circle i think
do you think you could use the properties of parallel lines?
i dont think so
well you know that a straight line would have an angle of 180 degrees right
so angle of AB = 180
and you know a part of it, AOC = 100
so COB would be?
80
yeah
now can you do something with that information
(use how AB and DC are parallel lines)
nooOOO you got it correct the first time hahhhaha
but if one of the angle of side AB is 80 degree then opposite to it will also be 80 degree..then triangle aoc angle is 40 so the other would be 60 cus 80+40+60=180 which is a straight lines angle???????
why would the opposite side also be 80 degrees?
its a transverse lone
line
which bisects
the other parallel line
oh you're talking about the opposite interior angles?
this x?
yep
a straight line has an angle 180 degree
ye
so 100 + x = 180
ye
and x = 80 correct
yea
haha it's opposite
isnt the other x 40
it would be wrong to say that it's the same side anyways - it looks different just by the raw eyes
hmm look at the diagram again
the sides that are parallel are AB and DC, so the opposite interior angle rule would apply for angles DCO and BOC
yeah i got it but im confused whether it will be 40+80 or just 80
i used the theorem in my previous grade but i dont remember it anymore and i gotta apply another property
well what you did before to get 40 is you got angle ACO right?
and you want to find angle ACD
this is a better diagram with all the values we got till now
we need to find angle ACD, which i marked with a question mark here
how would you go about doing that
YESS
you got it
well done 💪 💪
NAHH 1 MARK
haha npnpnp 🙏
@tiny drum Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i am learning complex analysis, and we learn about CR equations
to know at what points is a complex function f differentaible.
for example, solving CR equations, i get x = iy, since x,y must be real, thus the only solution is (0,0)
complex function f is differentiable only at (0,0)
if i get something like y = mx, then f is differnetiable on that straight line only. cool
but suppose f is analytic in some region, how would the answer when i solve the CR look like?
I have no clue how you jump from CR equations to x=iy
what function are you even considering
that's the end of me solving cr from a past year paper
i might be wrong of course, but for now, i know that, if i did not make mistakes in manipulation, then i believe that is the answer (0,0) for where f is differentiable.
and since that is a point, not an open region where f is differentiable everywhere inside, f is not analytic.
i have not found an example, to give me intuition, of the "form"? the end result of CR will take, if f is actually analytic
like if i get y = p(x), then f is differentiable along a line of points. but is still not analytic
so how would it look, if f is analytic
@quaint prawn CA doubts for you to solve
the answer to what?
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
alright, gimme abit
hope you don't mind the ping. was searching through pc
so the real part we can is u(x,y), imaginary part is iv(x,y)
so x,y are real numbers
part a...what i eventually got was
partial derivative u/dy = - partial v/dx
lead me to x = iy
(the du/dx = dv/dy gives me a polynomial? of powers of x, y and multiples of both but no constants)
since x, y must be real, the only solution is x = y = iy = 0
so f(z) is differentiable only at (0,0)
then comes part b
which suppose my answer to a is correct, then f is not analytic because its differentiable....in a closed? region(exact point)
honestly, i don't know what to write besides this argument. is there a more "mathy" way to make the case?
then since we are on the topic, suppose a function g(z) is actually analytic in a region. when solving the CR equation, how would it look like? any examples?
this is my questions.
@grand carbon Has your question been resolved?
What?
me solving part a
Your solution makes no sense
f(z)=u(x,y)+ i*v(x,y)
is real differentiable everywhere u(x,y) and v(x,y) are differentiable
so i just do individual tests for differentiability?
isn't the CR equations meant to check for differentiability of f?
it's asking you if it is real differentiable
i am sorry, i don't follow.
i am supposed to test for differentiability of u and v separately?
Yes and take the intersection of where they are differentiable
That is what part (a) is asking for
But are we sure that "Differentiable" here means real differentiable? I suppose it would have to, otherwise the answer to the second part would be the same
It's hard to know what exactly you're getting and doing from that write up. It would be much more handy if you had your work available.
Assuming you're correct that the CR equations are only satisfied at (0,0), then indeed the function is complex differentiable only there
CR being satisfied doesn't imply holomorphic, but also (0,0) is the only point where there should be any doubt if it is differentiable
complex or not
so the solution makes 0 sense
everywhere else it is the sum / product / quotient of holomorphic functions
it does if satisfies CR on like an open ball though right
I believe so
So yeah, logic is good. (0,0) is the only point, assuming the work was correct.
the only point where it might not be differentiable
definitely not the only point where it is
Well I haven't seen the work so I can't be sure
the function is posted tho
to test for real differentiability of bivalue(?) functions u and v
i take partial derivatives and compare?
i have never done it for real at least
I'm assuming their conclusion is correct
You don't know how to check if a real-valued function is differentiable?
If you ran the CR equations and got a different result, I'm glad you checked!
How about you assume you can't divide by 0?
test lim g'(x) = lim g'(x)
not sure how to test generally,
but at a point, c, take limit as x approaches c from left vs limit as x approaches c from right
What
⁉️
I think you need to do a lot of review on your calculus before coming back to complex analysis. Checking if a complex function is analytic or holomorphic will require you to know and understand how to differentiate real-valued functions of several variables
As for part (a), like I said earlier if you wanted to continue working on it, write f(z)=u(x,y)+i v(x,y)
then check if u, v are real-differentiable
if you're not sure how to do that then you need to review some stuff
wait how would you do this in R2?
there’s no left nor right
@slow canopy
Of course! Thank you for reminding the people nearby. I think you reacted to me by accident.
Just dont want you to keep confusing him by "confirming" that the only place the function is real-differentiable is at the origin (which is not even in the domain)
Ah wait, I see your concern now Austin
Like I said, didn't check the work. Took the result and confirmed the logic, given it's true.
closest i can think of is differentiating f(z), where its nicely written in z
lim(h to 0) f(z+h) - f(z)
simplify, then change z to x + iy,
then compare lim(h to 0) lim(ih to 0) (...) vs lim(ih to 0) lim(h to 0) (...)
if they contradict, f'(z) does not exist
We are not talking about f(z)
Indeed, (0,0) is not in the domain. The function doesn't exist there, much less have a derivative there
Remember part (a) is asking if it is real-differentiable
So you rewrite it into the form I provided above a few times
and check if u(x,y) and v(x,y) are differentiable
This is the part that confused me though. Part a) is not asking that?
as functions of two real variables
i was answering pikachu's question above
not the one posted
I think it is, like, f(z)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y) is differentiable as a function of real variables, otherwise it'd say holomorphic, and part (b) would be pointless
if it isn't asking that then part (a) and part (b) are the same question
as far as the course syllabus goes
a function can be complex differentiable but not analytic
analytic requires it being differentiable in an open connected region
But yeah I can't say for certain
Part (b) would be instantly solved by solving part (a)
you would find from part (a) the region(s) where the function is holomorphic
if it is only at a point (or nowhere) then it isn't analytic anywhere
otherwise, it's analytic in the entire region of holomorphicity
I don't think the question is that clear
I think it's time we ask a better sir @stiff musk
yeap.
which was my original question. how would a region(valid) look like?
a point/s would mean there are exact solutions? implies not analytic
a line? would be y = some function of x? also still not analytic
nowhere would be no solution?
though thank you for the headsup regarding my part a. i am looking at it again, or well, googling/reading stuff
@grand carbon Has your question been resolved?
@grand carbon Has your question been resolved?
what is your doubt?
What is your interpretation of the helpees doubt?
I took it to be asking if it was real differentiable
But we’re unsure
the pinned original doubt was unclear
is this the actual doubt?
i guess it could mean complex differentiable
but who knows
the doubtee must ask his sir
I think this is the actual doubt yes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It would be difficult to calculate ln(10^123456) via brute force, but manipulating the equation a bit gives 123456 * ln(10), which is much easier to compute. Is there a special name for when an equation gets simplified so no extremely large/small values come up in calculation?
not sure if this is exactly the term but perhaps preconditioning?
it definitely falls under some kind of numerical method for computers though
@tepid glen Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
right?
so no
also the reason you gave for a is wrong
to multiply two matrices their inner dimensions must match
they don't need to have the same columns and rows
the reason we can derive A^2-B^2=(A+B)(A-B) is because the second one expands to A^2-AB+BA-B^2 which is normally A^2-B^2
ones rows must match anothers collumns..
yes
there is an implicit assumption that they can be multiplied
matrix multiplication is usually not commutative so AB != BA
note that this doesnt work bc of what cygntauri said
doesn't matter if they are square or not
hows a true
its not
its not
^
Thats b
if sizes are the same
Which also happens to be false
you can
Sizes being the same doesnt mean they commute
its a square
Try
1 3
8 1
Times
4 9
12 8
Just random numbers i made up
Multiply them and you see its not communatice
the conclusion we came to on the first question generalizes to whatever matrix multiplication
Communative*
2nd question is just a special case
Yep, so not communative
so b is
Understand?
no
ye
ohhhhhhhh
i see
AB != BA
ok
now i gotta give 2x2 matrices that make 3 of these true
actually your reason for a isnt completely wrong
since we don't know anything about A and B we don't even know if their dimensions agree
so thats an additional reason
One 2x2 to satisfy 3 at once
Or 3 2x2s
either or
ye
Well 1 is easy
2 is slightly harder
gimme a sec
2 3 7 1 27 + 36=32 2 + 9=11
5 6 6 3 35 + 36=71 5 + 18=23
you can use these for example 1 too
``
1 0 0 0 10 + 01=0 10 + 00=0
0 0 1 0 00 + 01=0 00 + 00=0``
Matrix addition, multiplication, inversion, determinant and rank calculation, transposing, bringing to diagonal, row echelon form, exponentiation, LU Decomposition, QR-decomposition, Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), solving of systems of linear equations with solution steps
oh ye
@worldly surge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @worldly surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi im confused why it says determine the equation ? like determine what and why (also im confused how f(x) is related to the second equation
@vale cipher Has your question been resolved?
i believe determine here implies multiple (x-3) and (x+1)
the second equation actually applies the function f, by subbing x+2 into the function
hope that makes sense
uh
ya i dont get this
what does f(x) mean at all?
but fx = (x-3)(x+1)
f(x) is basically saying "input value x into function f"
and what comes after the = sign is what will be done to that x
so in f(x+2), you are replacing every x you see with x+2
so isnt it = (x+2) - 3 (x+2) + 1
@vale cipher Has your question been resolved?
Yeah but better way is to write ((x+2)-3) ((x+2)+1), don’t forget the brackets
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
the syllabus, as far as the lecturer taught, for this chapter and the way they are tested, to my knowledge, is about CR equations yeah
but i will try using the real differentiable method of components by austin.
but my original question is how will the solutions to CR look if f is analytic.
attached is a picture of an in class example. f is differentiable at these 4 points. f is not analytic
so how will the CR equations look if f(different from example) is analytic. like is there a pattern/form/structure?
we know that if we get specfic values, then f is differentiable only at these points, i.e not analytic.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if i have f(x) defined as to include $\int f(x)$ and $e^(\int\int f(x))$ is it possible to determine $\int\int f(x)$? (technically it is the integral minus some infisimential quantity) also i dont rlly need help actually solving it, once ik the method i can prob do it
speedydelete
what do you mean with "include"
its basically a giant complicated quadratic/linear (i forget) equation that is defined in terms of those 2 parts
it would be better if you just gave all context
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve c)? i know that L_R=(40n-25)/n and R_R=(40n+25)/n from b)
@sacred goblet Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Hello. I'm trying to find the answer to these 2 questions but I can't figure it out. Can anyone help me figure it out by chance. Have a great day/night
<@&286206848099549185>
@sacred goblet Has your question been resolved?
first question is 9in and second question is 75in
you have 4 equal sides (since its a square). so u know that 4*length of each side = 3feet or 36in.
then divide 36/4=9
np
.close
Closed by @sacred goblet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The following subvector spaces U1, U2 of the vector space IR2 are given:
U1 = span((-2,8)), U2 = span((2,1),(1,3))
Is the following statement true or false? Explain your statement precisely.
”The amounts {(1,−4)} represents a proof system of U1 ∩ U2.”
So I´m not sure how I can solve this, I don't know what U1 ∩ U2 is, maybe {(0,0)}? And if yes, how should I then proof that it doesn't or does represent a proof system?
U1 intersect U2 is all vectors in R^2 that can be written as both a linear combination of the vectors in U2 and U1
which you have been given
@storm tusk Has your question been resolved?
okay so then I have to proof if (1,-4) is a linear combination of the vectors U2 and U1?
i'm not sure i know what proof system is but any vector in U1 intersection U2 is both a linear combination of the vectors in U1 and one of those in U2
you can construct that by just saying
any (x, y) where (x, y) = t (-2, 8) and (x, y) = s (2, 1) + r (1, 3)
that is U1 intersect U2
hmm okay aaah it' so weird for me right now
i think a proof system is a set of vectors that can build a vector space
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
nevermind its only a set of vectors
maybe the term generating system says more to you?
as in the set of vectors that span the space?
yea, I think so, now I have to proof if it represents a proof system of U1 ∩ U2
so (-2,8) is a linear combination of (1,-4)
but is ((2,1),(1,3)) a linear combination?
if not, then maybe it is not a proof system
@storm tusk Has your question been resolved?
other way around
1, -4 has to be a linear combination of the set that spans U1 and of the set that spans U2
not other way around
oh okay how can I write that
maybe
x * 1 + y * -4 = ?
and then I turn them into equations
if you want to find out if a vector is a linear combination of these then you put in x and y of the vector
and find out if it gives you values for s and r
if it isn't
it will give you some error
something like 1 = 2
ooooh okay
or /0
thank you, this sounds good
something that says it is not possible
.close
Closed by @storm tusk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
okay I have now these equations:
2s + r = 1
s + 3r = -4
is this correct?
s = -0,15
r = 9/7
but it doesn't give the vector (1,-4)
i feel like the given statement is wrong but I got a s and r
s = 7/5, r = -9/5
oooh okay
wait
so I can say {(1,-4)} is a proof system of U1 ∩ U2
i just noticed
oh
okay that means hm.. {(1,-4)} spans also IR2 i think
oh so we have to have another equation?
no since U1 = R^2
U1 interset U2 = U2
sorry
U2 = R62
R^2
and U1 intersect U2 = U1
since U1 is a subspace of U2
and since the intersection of U1 and U2 = U1 it means any vector that spans U1 spans the intersection
oh does it mean any linear combination of U1 is also possible with U1 intersect U2?
so U1 = U1 intersection U2
i cannot believe i did not see that sooner
smh
right so if you want to prove that 1, -4 spans U1 intersect U2
you only have to prove it spans U1
because the intersection is equal to U1
(1,-4) * -2 = (-2,8) so it spans U1?
Closed by @storm tusk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain why it's 45-45t
i get that 45-45(1) = 0 but
Why do we want it to be 0
Have you found its function?
No whats the function ?
For example, like the function that tells in 3 second, A moves 3 meters
Idk how to set that up
yes
yeah
so you should create a function that relates the distance between the two trains
and then solve for a minimum
so I do the distance formula
@wraith river Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wraith river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone draw a representation of a right triangle, a calc like: height / hypotenuse?
what
i can draw a right triangle
oh you mean trig functions visualized?
i actually has a desmos graph for this
.
Can i see it?
sin is opposite/hypotenuse
cos is adjacent over hypotenuse
tan is opposite over adjacent
secant is hypotenuse over adjacent
csc is hypotenuse over opposite
cot is adjacent over opposite
But like
Isn't cos the base and sin the thing that goes with the height?
Wait whaaat?...
Okay
So
In this example
Where is our theta?
My drawing was this
Green = Hypotenuse
Blue = Height
Red = Cos
I just wanted to understand what we get when we divide height by hipotenuse
That's it
our theta starts when you cross the positive y line
and it keep increasing clockwise
and the cool thing about the unit circle definition of trig functions
is that they can go into the negatives
and they are defined past 90 degrees
sin(theta)
where theta is red green meeting angle
Blue = Height Red = Cos
You don't want to memorize it like this, because the trig functions are defined based on where the angle is located
Ohhh
So sin and cos can also change?
If theta was here, then the red is the adjacent side, and the blue is the opposite side in perspective of theta
And cos is defined as adjacent over hypotenuse, while sine is defined as opposite over hypotenuse
Ohh
OHHH
If theta was here, then red is opposite and blue is adjacent
So cos and sin are together with angle?
I know about opp and adj
Okay
So...
With cos we can get the angle with the hypotenuse and the height
No
We get the hypotenuse and the height with the angle?
Yes!?
It depends on where theta is located
What if it is on the red line?
This one?
Yeah
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/pnsnhdhlhe i made an easier to understand version
with only 2 of the
functions
theta is the middle angle
kind of
sort of
If you wanted to find the value of the angle, use what you know. You have two given values, the one in blue and the one in green. In perspective of theta, is the blue side opposite, adjacent, or hypotenuse?
So from origin to a point?
Adjacent
No
Wait what?
This image here
Yeah, the adjacent and the hypotenuse
the black orange angle
The opposite being blue
Is the blue side opposite or adjacent or the hypotenuse from theta?
Opposite
Ohh
I read it wrong before
What about the green side?
We don't care about the red side because you don't know the value of it
You only focus with what you know
You know the value of the blue side and the green side only
Since you just said that the blue side is opposite from theta and the green is the hypotenuse, what trig ratio can you use?
I can use the soh
?
Yes
Yeah okay... Lemme think a bit
But then we like
Just calc opp / hyp, or we use like, sin(opp / hyp)?
Oh no
Because sin(opp/hyp) would be an angle that is opp/hyp
Ahh
So, 15/17 ~= 0,882
We got the other one
Do you know the concept of inverse trig functions?
I know tan, atan and atan2 only..
This is wrong
If you wanted to find the red side, you didn't need to do trig
It's a right triangle
Do you recall the famous equation used for right triangles?
17² + 15² = x
Not quite that
What's the equation in general?
Equation of what? Which equation?
C² = A² + B²?