#help-28
1 messages · Page 146 of 1
okay so you got the answer
Thank you guys all so much!
I had one more question, how do you know you’re supposed to times everything by 1/n!
you divide by the thing that grows the fastest as n --> infinity
i mean, multiply by 1/n!
Ohhh yeah, is dividing by n! And multiplying 1/n! The same
Closed by @lament rivet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
my second answer came out to be the same but with the signs inverted
it is correct still, right?
cuz it just means unit vector but in opposite direction, which would still be considered parallel.
!1c
Please stick to your channel.
what
Read
And read
but both questions are different
Doesn't matter
so which one do I close, now that you are here?
Also doesn't matter
In case of vectors, parallel would usually mean that when they are overlapped they form an angle of 0⁰
If they are opposite/form 180⁰ angle they would be antiparallel
okay
so my answer
correct?
oh shit
then it is not correct
shucks man
but then
how would I know what is the direction of the second diagonal?
lorentz man
By knowing what vector the second diagonal is
If the first diagonal points in the direction as a+b vector then the second one would point at direction of a-b
You can draw a rough diagram of a and b, their tails touching together and check it out
@eternal summit Has your question been resolved?
no
hellp someone
@eternal summit Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @eternal summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is it wrong?
The first picture is what I got for a and the second and third are what I got for b
lmao photomath
yeah I don’t have a graphing calculator
fair
we are not rivh like you
the second one too
thank you
btw what site is that?
thank you again
I’ll start using that one
.close
Closed by @willow inlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just wondering if this is correct
example 8
yup it seems correct
Closed by @sullen raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help
how do you integrate 2 ln 5y?
do you know how to integrate ln y?
yes... actually it is 1/y
but the integral of ln y is yln(y)-y (try to derive it)
y/y-y?
do you know integration by parts?
😭
then look it up and as a practice problem integrate ln(y) = 1*ln(y)
hence try to train your memory
Okay let me look it real quick
wait hold on
is the derivative of 2*ln(5y) = 2/5y?
or is it wrong?
it is right 🙂
my goodness
i remember chain rule tho
hold on let me use chain rule
nevermind i'm not getting it
@fast peak
.close
Closed by @unborn tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is my answer wrong?
i used u-substition with u=8-cos(x) and du=sin(x)dx
Integral (8-u)u⁹du = 8u¹⁰/10-u¹¹/11+C
where did you get that from
What?
As you said substitute u=8-cosx
Theres a cosx in the beginning which would become (8-u)
8-cos would be u and rest as you mentioned du
What step is bothering you?
i found it to be $\int{cos(x)u^9\mathrm{d}u}$
talk_less
but how
u = 8 - cos(x) so cos(x) = 8 - u
Closed by @sleek quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does the .88 represent? 88% decay?
Close, it is a decay, but not 88%. Imagine if the number were 1.00. Is that a 100% decay?
no
well 1-x=.88
,calc .88-1
Result:
-0.12
you already said it
There's a lot of things you can call it
rate of depreciation, rate of remaining value, decay rate
depreciation yes
that was the word i was looking for
.clos
.close
Closed by @harsh elk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Going in with quadratics I get
2.97 seconds
It’s not right so I’m not too sure where I went wrong
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
which equation did you use?
H=ut+(1/2)gt^2
So what’s there use for this one?
Shoot
I’m getting .733
Is wrong
Omfg
I squared wrong :(
Doing something wrong can’t figure it out going insane
@sullen berry Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @sullen berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i approach this q?
Let Sn be the number of 110-free bitstrings of length n.
(a) Find S1, S2, and S3.
(b) For n ≥ 4, find a recursive expression for Sn.
I'm doing fine. How are you?
im good
ive just got stuck on a bunch of my courses
like data structures 2 and operating systems
its getting hectic lol
Is the operating systems course where you create one or more of an IT one?
sorry?
Oh, does the course teach you to make operating systems?
its like learning linux and c programming
yeah lol
well the course is supposed to go in depth in how os works
and kernels etc.
Ahh, OK.
OK, let's try this discrete math problem.
ok give me a sec if thats ok
OK.
OK.
(a) Find S1, S2, and S3.
is that supposed to be a geometric sequence because ik S was depicted for that way back when
do i hv to make a gemotric sequence?
No, first, what is S1?
No, it's 110-free bitstrings.
yea srry -free
So, bitstrings that don't have 110 in them.
yes correct
Like 01011
so S1 would be when we have size 1 string?
No, for S1.
i meant S1 lol srry
OK, what about S3?
You have 001 twice.
Well, you can do it in base-2 order.
000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 110, 111
but theres supposed to be 9?
No, 9 is incorrect.
So, S3 is 7.
Yes, but now we're doing b.
as in with n of length 3?
i dont think im following sorry? we can only have 1 or 0 after the bit 011
Right.
Once you get two 1 bits, you're stuck with only 1 bits.
so at some point we only have thje option 1
like mathematically?
No, I mean by thinking like we did with the 01111 thing.
What are some ways of not getting two 1s in a row?
well if we know what the last two bits are if we know they are 1 then place 1 again
No, I mean, let's say we don't want to have two 1s in a row.
So, we don't have two 1s in a row so far.
How can we maintain that?
Like with 010.
We don't have two 1s in a row.
i see that
How can we keep it from getting two 1s in a row?
OK, what bits are allowed after 010?
both 1 and 0
OK, what bits are allowed after 0100?
both again
OK, what bits are allowed after 01000?
both
OK, so when the last bit is 0, you can have either next.
oh ok
What about 0101?
btoh
OK, what about 01011?
1
What do you mean?
Right.
So, that doesn't avoid two 1s.
So, 0101.
What has to come next to avoid two 1s?
0
Yes, if you want to avoid two 1s, you have to do that.
Well, first, we want to think of it in English.
We want to get a more intuitive sense of the rules here.
ohh i see
So, the rules are that if you get 11, you're stuck with 1s forever.
yess
and we dont want that
well actually
isnt that fine
cant we just put 1s forever
Yes.
and its still 110 free
We're getting rules for what sequences work.
So, once you get 11, you're stuck with 1s.
When you have 01, you can follow that with 0 and then do whatever you want, or you can follow that with 1 and be stuck with 1s.
When you have 00, you can do whatever you want.
When you have 10, you can do whatever you want.
So, we need to know the previous two bits to see what we can do next.
Why?
im assuming so
so i can get two bits?
last bit
and bit before
or am i tripping
What do you mean by using Fibonacci to get two bits?
srry i might be overthinking it
OK, so we need to know the last two bits to know what we can do from there.
yeah
So, let's look at S2.
We have 00, 01, 10, and 11.
With the 11, we have one possibility for the next bit.
So, 11 as the previous 2 bits gives us one result with 3 bits.
11 -> 111.
Does that make sense?
yes
OK, and then that 111 will become like 11 for the next bit after that.
So, we have 11 -> 111, which gives us 11 for the next time.
With 01, what options do we have?
OK, so we have 010, which gives us 10 for next time.
We have 011, which gives us 11 for next time.
What about 00 and 10?
ok
It's a recurrence relation.
yeah i get that
So, let's look at S2.
We have 00, 01, 10, and 11.
- 00 -> 1 * 00 + 1 * 01
- 01 -> 1 * 10 + 1 * 11
- 10 -> 1 * 00 + 1 * 01
- 11 -> 1 * 11
Those are the count * the two bits for the next turn.
Does that make sense?
Well, if you have 00, you can get 00 or 01 for the next stage, right?
OK, so we add all those together.
why do we always multiply by 1 tho>?
Because that's how many ways there are to get from 00 to 00, for example.
No.
Now we start again:
- 2 * 00 -> 2 * 00, 2 * 01
- 2 * 01 -> 2 * 10, 2 * 11
- 1 * 10 -> 1 * 00, 1 * 01
- 2 * 11 -> 2 * 11
Does it make sense what I did there?
sorta yeah
OK, put it in your own words.
2 * 00 -> 2 * 00, 2 * 01
here there are two ways to get 00?
Yes. You have 2 ways of starting out with 00, so there are 2 ways of getting 00 and 2 ways of getting 01.
0000, 0001, 1000, 1001
You start out with 000 or 100, you get those four.
yes
OK, so can you put it in your own words what happened here ^
so when we start of with 00 there are to ways to get this, either from a 01 or 00
right?
No, for the whole four lines.
like an expression to describe it
No, like your understanding of what it means.
i get what it means
its just showing when we start with 2 bits
we can add either a 0 or 1
to get the following 2 bits
the new 2 bits
right?
That's part of it.
OK, so do the next stage.
with 3 bits?
No, using the same technique I used there.
No, there were four lines.
This has four lines.
I think you got the first part before the arrow.
Now add the arrow and what comes after it.
3 * 00 -> 3 * 00, 3 * 01
3 * 01 -> 3 * 11, 3 * 10
2 * 10 -> 2 * 00, 2 * 01
4 * 11 -> 4 * 11
What comes after each arrow?
did i do it wrong
That looks fine.
So, let's look at 3, 3, 2, 4 at the start of your lines.
That's for S4.
You have 0000, 0100, 1000. You have 0001, 0101, 1001. You have 0010, 1010. You have 0011, 0111, 1011, 1111.
So, there are three items that end with 00 in S4, three with 01, two with 10, and four with 11.
So, S4 = 3 + 3 + 2 + 4.
yes ig
So, using what you put, what's S5?
S5 = 5 + 5 + 7 + 3?
Yes.
ill be honest im just intuitievly doing it i dont rlly know whats happening anymore lol
OK, let's go back.
is there an easier way to do this like for example if i get a similar question on an exam
i feel like this method is too long?
I'm not sure of a shorter method.
ah unfortunate
So, we started with S2.
yes
just curious do you have to sleep soon, i dont want to take too much of your time
No, I'm fine for now.
I ran into a dead end, unfortunately.
Here's where I got to:```
a * 00 -> a * 00, a * 01
b * 01 -> b * 10, b * 11
c * 10 -> c * 00, c * 01
d * 11 -> d * 11
S_n-3 = a + b + c + d
(a + c) * 00 -> (a + c) * 00, (a + c) * 01
(a + c) * 01 -> (a + c) * 10, (a + c) * 11
b * 10 -> b * 00, b * 01
(b + d) * 11 -> (b + d) * 11
S_n-2 = 2a + 2b + 2c + d
(a + b + c) * 00 -> (a + b + c) * 00, (a + b + c) * 01
(a + b + c) * 01 -> (a + b + c) * 10, (a + b + c) * 11
(a + c) * 10 -> (a + c) * 00, (a + c) * 01
(a + b + c + d) * 11 -> (a + b + c + d) * 11
S_n-1 = 4a + 3b + 4c + d
(2a + b + 2c) * 00 -> (2a + b + 2c) * 00, (2a + b + 2c) * 01
(2a + b + 2c) * 01 -> (2a + b + 2c) * 10, (2a + b + 2c) * 11
(a + b + c) * 10 -> (a + b + c) * 00, (a + b + c) * 01
(2a + 2b + 2c + d) * 11 -> (2a + 2b + 2c + d) * 11
S_n = 7a + 5b + 7c + d
i can continue this queston later
So, one thing I notice is that S_n-2 - S_n-3 = a + b + c.
so its about noticing patterns
Yes.
Then S_n-1 - S_n-2 = 2a + b + 2c.
Then (2a + b + 2c) - (a + b + c) = a + c.
Then (2a + b + 2c) - 2(a + c) = b.
So, a and c always have the same coefficients.
So, S_n-3 - (a + b + c) = d.
So, now we have a + c, b, and d.
Let's write S_n-a as t_a.
is it cool if we do this another time?
Yes, that's fine.
i dont think im ready for this question yet
i will save the info u sent me tho
and will talk abt it later
OK.
but thnx for helping me with the questions
No problem.
A bit.
yeah dont wanna take much of ur time
i will try to do some questions tmmrw if i get stuck ill lyk lol
OK.
but yeah thanks and gn 😄
You too.
@long solstice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
these are the correct answers.
my question is that is subspace R^n determined by the length n of a column of A?
the column space is the set of all linear combinations of columns of A
so yea, it's a subspace of R^4 because the columns are length 4
@kind cave Has your question been resolved?
Think of 2D -> R^2, 3D -> R^3 so by the definition of it, 4D -> R^4 and column lengths do so
Closed by @kind cave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is x (there was no additional info given)
Likely the area of DEC
Closed by @flat geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im lost here. Its in the specific section on the monotone convergence theorem
have you studied derivatives?
no
i can do part (a), and to apply the monotone convergence theorem I can see that both sequences are bounded below
but i have no clue how you could determine they are monotonic and bounded above. how could they be bounded above actually??
You can use this (x-y)^2>=0
yeah thats what i came up with in part a, but im not totally seeing how it applies
do you mean you don't know how to get to that inequality in part a) from what I said?
No i derived that inequality while doing part a
i dont see how that applies to part b though
is related to part a because it uses the relationship between the AM and the GM to generate two sequences that will converge to the same limit
assume x_1 <= y_1
@nova island Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185> anyone? I tried solving but didn’t get it.
<@&286206848099549185> anyone paleaseeee
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Okayyyyyyyyyyyyy
<@&286206848099549185>
@fervent birch Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@fervent birch Has your question been resolved?
@fervent birch Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
The minimum coefficient of friction that allows the puck to stay at an angle of 45° with the vertical is 2/square root of 7. In order for the puck to maintain the 45° angle, it must have enough friction to keep itself in place and prevent it from slipping, therefore the minimum friction coefficient must be enough to offset gravity and the centrifugal force of the rotating sphere. The equation that shows the minimum friction coefficient for the puck to remain at the 45° angle is given by tan(45°)=2 square root of 7, which would be 2/square root of 7.
@fervent birch
Tysm I am gonna try
@fervent birch Has your question been resolved?
is this from chatgpt
@fervent birch Has your question been resolved?
@fervent birch Has your question been resolved?
Find the vector which satisfies the condition of balancing acceleration dot product gravity
Don’t forget that your acceleration vector will be affected by 45 degrees
I didn’t get it
"better helper role" it's more like when you use chatgpt and copy paste from here
can't believe you actually wrote all these within seconds
nah it is way longer
but how i dont use
you must have used another ai tool no?
i dont even know other thing
ok then what happened here after?
you ignored it
Omg
Wdym I just couldn’t solve it afterwards😭
you said "I keep getting the wrong answer" tho
Yeah
does this mean their help didn't help or what
Yeah exactly🌝
^^
It didn’t even make sense ngl
yea
I was just happy someone finally answered
It’s okay no one rlly could answer it and I didn’t understand
@fervent birch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fervent birch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
excuse me
is there multiple ways i can prove this?
i dont get what "proof by contradiction" means
You need to prove in two directions
two?
Yes
(1) if n is odd then n=4k+-1
(2) if n=4k+-1 then n is odd
Explain why is this odd
it is odd
because 2k is uh even
and then
- or - 1 makes it odd
is that all i need to do
i feel like im doing this wrong
wait so it is =2m+-1 where m equal 2k an integer
You can do that but it’s not necessary
Yeah but what are you trying to prove here
that n is odd if and only n=4k+-1
What does this prove?
that 4k+/- 1 is odd
but it doesnt prove if only
idk how to do that
You are proving (2) here
Now you need to prove (1)
Try considering the cases where a is odd and a is even
wdym by dis?
You are trying to prove that if n=2a+1
then n=4k+1 or 4k-1
is number 1 the prove n is odd part and the nnumber 2 is the only if part?
Yeah
so i just have to do whatever to force it into the form 4k+/-1?
Yeah
yea can u pls teach me proof by contradiction?
First we want to assume the statement we want to prove is false
What does this mean?
It means that there exists some even number m such that
m = 4k+1 or 4k-1
m is even
So m+1 and m-1 are odd
wait is proof by contradiction same as direct proofs?
oh nvmnvm
contradiction we assume that one is false?
Yeah
why do we have m is even?
Because the statement says that n=4k+1 or 4k-1 is odd
ohh i see i see
If this statement is false
This means that some even number can be written as 4k+1 or 4k-1
Here is a proof by contradiction
What we want is assume the statement is false
If a contradiction is found
Our assumption must be false
Hence the statement is true
is this proved?
can u give me another example so i can try apply it
Do you know the proof of sqrt2 is irrational
can u use contradiction for this one
yes!
can this be proved by contradiction
as it cannot be expressed as an integer
*fraction, not integer
ohhh yehahahehehahahaha
This does not require proof by contradiction
did u say same number is both odd and even
Yeah that is a contradiction we arrived from our assumption
Meaning that our assumption is false
what do u mean by same number is both odd and even
n+-1 is odd
4k is even
Closed by @vivid berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does it mean by dividing a number by a ratio and why will there be 2 different answers?
It means break the number 62 into two pieces, like x + y, such that x/3 equals y/7
thanks
.close
Closed by @unkempt ivy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve the ticked part?
<@&286206848099549185>
YEA?
how do i begin to solve?
idk
for the maximum height
then differentiate it twice to check if it is the maximum or minimum value
rule:
if d²y/dt² >0 then minimum value
if d²y/dt²<0 then maximm
Ok disdn’t see that
t = 7.5
Good bro
thanks
Tho i dont know differentiation yet
which grade you in?
9
india?
Yupp
Yes
i also am in 9
I still know sone basics
U in india?
bangladesh
Ohh
😂
im dead
then we are alr taking 544 as the height no?
Yes
Hmmm
You can use some physics
Like when the fuel gets exhausted
u=240ft/s
V=0
Take g=-10
-73.152^2 = -20h
i tried using v2 - u2 = 2as
h=267.5607
So total h = 544+267.5607
Put it in equation to get T
Obviously i am talking nonsense
Because we are given that it is subjected to more forces than just gravity
only if
K
The mathematical way is that the max height occurs at the vertex of the parabola, you can apply this. Use that to find the x coord of the vertex then find the y coord and that's the max height
@grim skiff thats not in ncert
And our guy is giving board exams
So cant use that
U from Inida?
India?
I don't know what ncert is and that's that commonly learned formula for vertex and parabolas
Yeah but the grade our guy is in doesn’t teaches him it
It's so common that it's part of the quadratic formula
i dont really much options left anymore
U could ask it from ur teacher
The height is the y coord
so -b/2a here is -7.5
a is -16 and b is 240?
Yes
Yes that was the mistake
Yes
1444?
Yes
Closed by @versed sierra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help guys
:/
@low mesa Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@low mesa The British date '010299' would be read as '99-02-01' in the ISO format and '99-01-02' in the U.S. format. The largest difference here would be between 2nd January 1999 and 1st January 1970, which is indeed 29 years, 11 months, and 1 day.
Therefore, the correct answer is C: 29 years, 11 months, and 1 day.
tysm
yeah
one question why did u used 1970?
@agile mountain
may u give full explanation
@low mesa Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Men:women::5:4
Took ratio as 25:20 for convenience
40 % women unmarried then 8 unit of women un married
Unmarried women number = 30
8 unit = 30
1 unit = 30/8
Total unit of people 45
Then total number of people = 45*(30/8)
But I am getting decimal here...
Where did I go wrong??
i can help
@rigid gazelle
Let's denote the number of men by ( M ) and the number of women by ( W ).
From point 1 we have:
W = 4/5 M
From point 2, if 40% of the men are unmarried, then 60% are married. So the number of married men is 0.6M
From point 4, we know there are 30 unmarried women.
The tricky part is to understand point 3. Half of the married women came with their husbands, which means the other half did not. Since a quarter of the married men came with their wives, it means that three-quarters did not. But since every married man who came with his wife is paired with a married woman who came with her husband, this should equal half the number of married women.
So let's denote the number of married men who came with their wives as MW (which is also the number of married women who came with their husbands).
Now we can say that:
MW = ¼ times 0.6M
MW = ½ times Number of married women
Since MW = ½ times Number of married women and MW = ¼ times 0.6M, we can set these equal to each other to find the number of married women and thus the number of married men.
Let's calculate these values
Based on the problem and the calculations:
There are 60 men at the gathering.
There are 48 women at the gathering.
So in total, there are 108 people at the gathering.
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @gusty topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Two circles are concentric at M ,
AB is a chord in the greater circle and touches the smaller circle at C , if AB = 14 cm
Find: the area of the shaded part between the two circles
I have absolutely zero idea on how to solve this
do you have a diagram?
Two circles are concentric at M ,
AB is a chord in the greater circle and touches the smaller circle at C , if AB = 14 cm
Find: the area of the shaded part between the two circles
look at triangle AMC
how can you get the area of the part given the radii of the two circles
MA (radius of greater circle) = sqrt(MC^2 + 7^2) ,
Thereis no way to find MC
let MC be little r and MA be big R
Okay..
can you write CA in terms of r and R
CA² = R² - r²
good
R² - r² = 7²
not quite
youre missing something
ok good
how can you write the area you want in terms of r and R
@twilit leafπR² - πr²
@twilit leaf
πR² - πr² = π(R² - r²) = π7² = 49π 🤯🤯
kaboom
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dim stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I just want to make 100% sure that I'm not wrong cause usually I trust the computers here
WolframAlpha is high, right?
Like, wolframalpha is literally just. drunk
I wouldn't put up a question for something so simple but i almost always trust the computers so i wanna make sure the computers are dumb
i have no clue its possible theres some weird exception that its accounting for
Yeah I typically trust the computers cause they typically know an exception that I don't know
but WolframAlpha refuses to tell me what the exception is
i looked this up
Yes, there are some restrictions on when you can swap the limits of integration. One important restriction is that the integral must be convergent, meaning that it must have a finite value. Additionally, the integral must be able to be evaluated from both sets of limits, and the limits must be continuous at the point of swapping.
Reference: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/swapping-the-limits-of-integration.344128/
idk how picky wolfram is being
they could be picky about continuity
but still shouldn't matter?
strange
feels sort of silly to count the unbounded integral as an 'exception'
like yeah most rules of math dont work if you use infinity lmfao
@brittle lance Has your question been resolved?
I would assume this depends on how you define integration
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I prove $\frac{1}{1-\sin(x)}-\frac{1}{1+sin(x)}=2\tan(x)\sec(x)$
BlazeStorm81
@torn jolt
well, have you made an attempt
okie dokie
$\frac{1}{1-sin(x)}-\frac{1}{1+sin(x)}=2\frac{sin}{cos}\frac{1}{\cos}$
BlazeStorm81
ok so i changed everything to be in terms of sine and cosine ykyk
then i checked for identities and couldnt find anything so i just started experimenting which got me this:
$\frac{1-sin}{1-sin^2}-\frac{1-sin}{1-sin^2}=2\frac{sin}{cos}\frac{1}{\cos}$
BlazeStorm81
multiplied the left hand side by sine because it looked wonky and the side on the right looked good
which got me when simplified
$\frac{1-\sin}{\cos}-\frac{1-\sin}{\cos}=2\frac{sin}{cos}\frac{1}{\cos}$
BlazeStorm81
theres an error here
where?
first term numerator
how? I just multiplied 1 by 1-sin
(1-sin)(1-sin) is not (1-sin^2)
you meant to multiply by 1+sin
for a common denominator
sure
^
$\frac{1+sin}{1-sin^2} - \frac{1-sin}{1-sin^2}$
AℤØ
oh yeah nvm youre right
i was referring to the two first fractions not the left side of the equation and the right side haha
but yeah ur right cuz u want same denominator
right?
yeah, you want to combine the terms
and wait lemme just clarify rq
so the left fraction here was multiplied by 1 + sin and the right fraction here was multiplied by 1 - sin
to get same denominator
correct?
by them over themselves, yes
ok that makes sense
so now that you have this what can you do here?
what do you think
both
so it should look like $\frac{0}{cos}$?
BlazeStorm81
1+sin-1-sin = 0
nah somethings messed up here what am i doing wrong
does the sin become positive on the right fraction?
multiply each side by 0
careful with the signs
i need to go back to my basics so bad
