#help-28
1 messages · Page 142 of 1
if its positive, it just means the function bounds more positive area than negative
it doesn't mean it doesn't bound any negative area at all
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh i see
with that in mind, a counterexample should be easy to find
i hope one day i will be better at math
what about x^3 + 1/2
on interval [-1,1]
that function have some negative value but integral positive
i really good at claculating problems but not so good at concept
you could just take f(x)=x over [-1,2]
but your example works as well
or otherwise, what Jessica was hinting at is that you can take any function with positive integral
then move a single point to somewhere negative
because changing the value of an integrand at a single point doesn't change the value of the integral
e.g., modify the constant function f(x) = 1 to g(x) = {-1 if x=0, 1 otherwise} for another simple example
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vale juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help pls I’m trying to figure out how to solve this and I’m just getting nowhere
Have to find left/right limits according to table
seems accurate so far
This is the information given to me lol
I have to figure out the limits which is a b c
do you know what the left limit is?
No honestly I don’t really understand or know what that is. This is from a practice worksheet for my calc 1 class and I’ve been sick this whole week so I pretty much know nothing about this
I just know the answers are in infinity form
Is it 3.999 and 4.001
Left/right
the left limit of f(x) is $\lim_{x\to a^-}f(x)$ means the value of f(x) as x approaches a from just below a
in the case of x = 4, it means you'd want to look at values just under 4
Zybikron
And the right limit is just above 4?
yes
How would I use that to figure out a b and c then
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
@ivory cairn sorry to ping u I was gone for a while
Closed by @zenith hare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
integration?
yeah
@tiny stirrup Has your question been resolved?
you can use integration to find the area under each curve and compare them
@tiny stirrup Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tiny stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could i get some help how to solve this math question?
!showwork
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
I am not sure how to solve it. I am wondering what is the correct way to go about it.
2x+10y=26,98 and than do I put either x or y to 0?
You can solve for x or y and then plug and chug for the other
How do I solve for x and y precisely?
Is it like I said by turning one of the variables to 0?
Or do i for example:
2x+10y=26,98
-2x -2x
10y=26,98-2x
10
@obtuse gate Has your question been resolved?
Yes and y = (26,98 - 2x)/10
Insert y into the other formula
Then solve for x
Once you have x, you can then solve for y
.close
Closed by @obtuse gate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello I don’t know how to do this 3d vector question
@nova moth Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
type "hello"
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
your grammar was incorrect there

that's an incomplete sentence, I suppose
i dunno, i was just following your instructions
I see
I would like to discuss
Static Equilibrium
cool, i'm eager to learn what that might be
"center of gravity"
is a sub-topic included in Static Equilibrium
okay so there's a statement written on my book
does this have anything to do with center of mass, and if not, what's the difference
static equilibrium where?
theres one in fluids
Laws of motion
both of them are really the same thing but the application changes
one is where you balance pressure and the other is with mass and tension and normal forces
How do I find "center of gravity" of an object?
well
first of all
"find" is kind of the wrong word, because it dosent exist
we assume it does to make our physics easy
written in* not on
(sounds better)
unless maybe you literally wrote it on the cover
they have different meanings, someone could've actually physically written something on the book
and there are different ways to do it, there are centre of gravities of specific shapes like rectangle at height/2
thats possible
why are we discussing whether or not the text was written or or in the book?
i think in this context its likely not that
Please read the channel description before posting, and stay on topic.
let the man physics
I had a long paragraph talkin about this
it is better to watch the diagram first before reading the following context:
my books wrote that if I hung an object with two different connecting points (which connects the hook to the object) then the intersection of the two vertical line which crosses the connecting points respectively.
such intersection
is the center of gravity
i'm gonna guess you haven't spent much time in a @golden shore help channel
and the book provides a way to find it
i have...
please don't remind me
hahaha fair
like the integration formulas?
how it works tho?
there was this one time with complex numbers and how e^180i = e^(i times pi) bc degrees and radians
;-;
i failed my mission
there's no mathematical proof for the statement
i see
and I wonder how to interpret it
well firstly
you have reactivated my PTSD
.
so dont think of it as a like actual thing
its like a free body diagram
drawn for convinience (engineers are lazy)
wait, physicists don't draw free body diagrams? they did in my classes
they do, but thats not how the body actually is
like you draw a dot for a human
assuming the mass is spread uniformly
have you ever
spun a basketball on ur finger?
well within the context of classical mechanics surely centers of mass exist, presumably we're not dealing with quantum issues here
do NOT go there
I did tried it
it will help you understand
you actually have wrong grammar there in that form
bro fr prepared a movie for us
the point where the book actually spins, is the centre of gravity
wouldn't it be incorrect grammar
bro spin attempt #1 failure
well youre not allowed to correct me because my name isnt please correct my grammar
:O

i've seen worse, my friends are clowns
i was lying
i dont have friends
💀
ok sorry
does it means I cannot spin anything with my finger if it is not set on the center of gravity.

can such phenomenon be explaind through the concept of torque
are they related.
you are making an assumption
you assumed you can spin anything
ohhh
i think torque occurs if its not on the centre of mass
but yes, you cant just rotate it unless its being balanced
AT the very point youre spinning it
i mean center of gravity
there is no torque
why, im so curious
remember how we defined torque a few hours back
because torque is angular acceleration
you never tried the door thing did you
like sideways

what door thing? now im curious
where is austin's self portrait when we need it
what with the 🚪
try pushing a door close to its hinges
same height from the floor, you try to open the door by pushing it while slowly going towards the hinge
you will see WHY torque has length in its formula
jokes on you i open all my doors like this
gigachad
..
man
thats a lot of word done
real
it becomes harder for me to open the door, when my hand getting closer to the hinge, with same amount of force I employed.
@twin wolf btw where was that question from before rfom
yea
that's bc torque
has less effect
r x F baby
closer to the joint
which is why the distance from the hinged point matters
just a textbook my school makes us uses
12th
Yoyo
but the hinge case does not explain the statement
do you know where to push a door for maximum torque
it always happens
why the center of the weight happens to be the intersection?
close to its hinge!!!
fr
thus you have length in the formulas of torque, now since you need length to calculate torque, how would there be any torque at the very point the body is spinning
symmetry
well that was quick
whoa impressive
ikr
The reason symmetry matters is very obvious, read my book example is gone
at least we didn't lose the book spinning video
I see
a true treasure to mankind
you need to apply your force to balance the "mg"
since it has mass in it
it needs to be at the centre of gravity
because we have defined centre of gravity to be the point where the entire weight of the body is
actually no nax
which is why symmetry is important
because my tip is on the center of gravity of the book
centre of gravity is where the relative distribution of mass is equal
therefore it would not falls from my hand
it needs to be precisely at the centre
i see
they did not make any contact
symmetrical in terms of mass
oh alright, might just be elasticity
no
oh alright then
symmerical in uniform shapes
no
the spheres is at the midpoint
.
uniform shapes
I THOUGHT U MEANT SYMMETRICAL IN UNIFORM SHAPES
uh
semantics issue
i am confused but yes i suppose
something @golden shore's username would be worried about
which, incidentally, has multiple grammatical errors itself
?
i dont know how to describe the blue area
it is the area that the eraser contacts with the table
PCMG douses the channel in a swathe of blue
im not sure if there's a specific term for it
yes
then the object will falls
that's the statement written on my book
well
that's because
the blue area is defined as the area of contact
im assuming
so if it's unsupported
yes
ofc it will fall
so that's why
if the eraser isn't touching anything but the COG is, it won't fall
can it be explained by torques and Static Equilibrium
no idea what those r
and no idts
i dont know
you can't just link everything to torque PCMG
really
yes
its pretty obvious
really
but the eraser are going to spin when it falls
there's some torque involve in the scenarios
thats because there isnt an equilirium
why it is true tho?

??
you should ask this in the physics discord
this has devolved from a simple PCMG question (oxymoron intended) to... whatever this is
@golden shore has your question been solved
no, I wonder why it is true
because a force is being applied smwh other than the COG, so angular acceleration occurs
i just answered
physics stuff is generally allowed here, but it helps a lot if there's at least some math content to the question haha
@stiff musk im losing my mind here, classical is not my strong suit
im more of the particle or astronomy guy
i don't know what the question actually is here
ok i guess it's this?
OH GOD
this is also one of my questions
what are the other ones
@stiff musk
IT'S ALL COMING BACK TO ME
THE PCMG CHANNELS
the other ones are solved
well the center of gravity iirc is just
$$\frac{\int x \rho(x),dx}{\int \rho(x),dx}$$
Bungo
I suppose the hooking method I just delivered earlier will alway works despite the shape of the object
where x = position vector of a point and rho(x) is the mass density at that point
i think so yea
note, the integral in the denominator is just the total mass
the center of gravity is a POINT
yep
so how does that define a point
i havent done vector calc
x is the position vector
oh i see
i'm too lazy to put a boldface or whatever
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
sighs
@stiff musk
do tell
more physics
look at those equations, looks like what i wrote if dx is counting measure
alpha particles?
(I suppose) is some small particle of a object
those are just the discrete version of my equation, and they split it into x and y components
the W's correspond to my rho
(it's the mass density)
Why are they equivalent?
imma brb
the two scenarios
my x is a vector, think of it as the vector (x, y) if you're in 2 dimensions, or (x, y, z) if you're in 3
G is the center of mass
we can't read chinese/japanese/other asian language
What is p(x)?
my p(x) corresponds to your W_i
mine is just the "continuous" version
it says the situation that these w1,w2,... forces applied on these particles in the case 1
in the discrete version, p(x) becomes W_i, the integrals become sums
@stiff musk the feeling of it being a PCMG channel is back
did it ever leave?
can be simpliied to the case 2
once or twice briefly
oh those are probably mass times gravity accel then?
sure, you can multiply my whole equation by g if you want force
where the sum of these forces is applied merely on the center of the mass G
center of mass is a position though, not a force
How to interpret it
sighs
how it works
why can the situation be simplified
what that is saying (i guess, i don't read the language) is that if you have a multiparticle system with gravity acting on all the particles, then for the purpose of translational motion, you can treat the system as if all the mass is concentrated at the center of mass (what you're calling center of gravity)
the center of mass will then obey the usual F = ma equations as if it were a single point mass
the individual particles may fly around in crazy ways but the CM will have your usual nice clean parabolic motion
I see
wait stop stop stop
PCMG i think one thing is important
in the case of random particulate matter
gravity is negligible
at the subatomic level, it's basically nothing
keep that in mind
I think so, even though i cannot interpret the context on the picture
neither can i tbh
it's some kind of rope with three strings at the end and a ball attached to each string
the man throws it at an animal to capture it
the three balls can move in hard to predict ways due to the strings
but the center of mass of the system moves in the predictable parabola
the man can throw it as if it were a single ball and overall it behaves as expected
devolves into ball demon
I’ve never heard of a bola
i cannot visualize the center of mass in the system which consists of three balls and a bola.
hurling through the air
the rotation is hard to predict but the center follows the parabola
ayyyy he's back
me either, except in that book haha
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
hurrah
thank you guys for all the explanation.
thank you
Yes
@golden shore he's the real gigachad here fr
see more examples in this video
at around 1:45
Center of mass is defined and demonstrated in projectile motion. We demonstrate what happens when you push at or near the center of mass. The center of mass of a Feeble is demonstrated. And the “Hang Test” is used to find the center of mass of a flat, irregular object. Want Lecture Notes? https://www.flippingphysics.com/center-of-mass.html This ...
BRO THAT THUMBNAIL
thats terrific
as an entertainment while eating my lunch
i will close the channel
now
since my question is solved
.close
Closed by @golden shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
The “an” is unnecessary by the way
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Am I right until the arrow
check your limits after you change 2theta to u
Closed by @obsidian swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain me why this function is defined on ]0,e^1/3[ please ?
I mean my problem is the e^1/3
Seems to be when y(x) is positive
Look back at the problem to see if there's a condition where y(x) needs to be positive
Yeah makes sense now
Npnp!
.close
Closed by @sly prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
um
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
uhh
The timing 😭
lol
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do u solve these
Do u just find derivative and sub x in to fx
,rotate
Umm can u help me a bit
use this
Ohk thx also what does the denominator for the second one mean
use the first one
What do i do after that
Oh i get it
Nvm thx
.close
Closed by @hollow loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to find the vertices of the circle 4x^2+4y^2=1 ?
ik that for standard form -> x^2/a^2+y^2/b^2=1 a & b are the radius but i'm confused on finding the radius when x & y have coefficients
A circle has no corners
Sorry, how to find the radius
You can divide both sides by 4
Closed by @hardy folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, Idk how to solve it properly, my first try was something like x*35/1.7, but its is incorrect. Any help?
Have you been told if the amount of light hold increases lineraly or exponentially?
no (
I guess my solution I tried is related to linear increase, so I need to try exponential?
Hm, well, as far as I remember this from optics lecture it is indeed linear
yeah, but it's math xD
i guess it shouldn't be solved using physics formulas
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @bitter tide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me understand what i'm doing wrong?
$\int_0^1 \frac{x+1}{x^2+5x+6} dx$
Merineth
according to wolf the integral should be two logs?
I suggest you multiply and divide by 2 first and then add and subtract 3 to the numerator
Instead of using partial fractions
Why can't i use partial fraction?
I would've never come up with multiplying and divide by 2 and add and subtract 3
shouldn't partial fraction work just as fine?
You could use partial fractions too
Did i atleast figure out A and B correctly?
$\int\frac{1}{x+2} dx$ isn’t equal to something in arctan
it should be ln
Why?
you can u sub for x+2
y0shi
Isn't that technically ok?
then you have to take the derivative of $sqrt(x)$
y0shi
when doing arc tan
you are changing the bottom x term
to something in terms of u^2
and since you are subbing x for u
you are applying u sub
$\frac{1}{2+3} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}^2 + \sqrt{3}^3}$
Merineth
They are equivalent
yeah but that’s for constants
Merineth
$\int\frac{1}{\sqrt(x)^2+\sqrt(2)^2}dx$ let’s take this for example
yes
y0shi
you are trying to get this in the form of $\frac{1}{u^2+a^2}$ yes?
y0shi
It is already in that form
yep
No
which requires changing dx to du
No
yes you do
okay let’s take this example $\int\frac{1}{4x^2+4} dx$
y0shi
the same with 2
what would be the answer
you can't apply it
since we have a constant infront of x
Mine does not have a constant
NO
it’ll be in the form of u^2
i'm not subbing!!!!!!!!!!!
this is subbing
**no u substituion **
look
yep
I am not subbing
x here is sqrt x for your question
it’ll be better if you put that x to u so there’ll be less confusion
you have to
since that equation only works
if you have it all in terms of u
okay how about this
take the derivative of what you have
see if you get it back
cuz you won’t
This is basically like saying int of 8x³ is (2x)⁴/4
why’re we even using inverse tan tho
cuz it doesn’t even work for something like this
And i'm asking why
well actually it does kinda work but still give an ln at the end
Is it because the formula requires it to be $x^2$ and not $\sqrt{x}^2$ ? Even tho they are essentially the same thing?
Merineth
yes
Well okay then
you can do sqrt x
but you also have to take the derivative of it
let’s not make it more complicated and just leave it as what you wrote there
Fine, it makes no sense but i'll just live with it
What is the reason behind being able to rewrite $4 = 2^2$ but not being able to rewrite x as $\sqrt{x}^2$?
Merineth
here how about this $\int\frac{1}{u^2+a^2} du$ = $\frac{1}{a} arctan(\frac{u}{a})+C$
y0shi
this is true right
our inverse tan formula
but i just switched u to x so we can distinguish between them easily
this formula only holds true if an integral can end up in this form
u would be sqrt x
and a would be 2
yet here we have to change dx to du
which is why a substitution must be used
if we keep it as what you have up there
the final antiderivative doesn’t account for the chain rule
coming from the sqrt x
Ok so basically constants can be written in exponential form but variables cannot
not necessarily
but like doing what you did up there is equivalent of saying the integral of sin^2(x) can be solved using the power rule
That's not the way to look at it
First of all, if you have any positive quantity a, you can use a = sqrt(a^2)
Aah the sqrt can't handle negatives on the variable x?
However, in this expression, there is only one a but two u's:
$\int\frac{1}{u^2+a^2} du$
Nel
No, sqrt is always positive
Though if you know that the quantity a is negative, you can use a = -sqrt(a^2)
$\frac{1}{x + 4} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}^2 + 2^2}$ Then how come this isn't perfectly viable?
Merineth
This is viable (assuming x is positive)
Read that again
look how u is sqrt x in this case
and the integral here has a du
whereas we have a dx in our original integral
- how are you thinking of dealing with that?
Do you understand what I mean yet?
No i don't
But i think i'll just accept that unless i have x^2 to begin with i wont use the formula for arctan and use u sub instead 
How many times do you see u here?
2?
Right, now if you have sqrt(x)^2 and you want this to be u^2, what do you want to replace u with?
sqrt(x)
now what about du
Yes, and what do you get as an expression if you replace all the u's with sqrt(x)?
x
i'd get \sqrt(x) ^2
$\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}^2 + a^2} d\sqrt{x}$
Where did the du go?
.
I said all
Merineth
There you go
See, that's different from the arctan formula
It's d sqrt(x), not dx
I see
Are we going back to this now?
No i already solved it
i'm on another one rn
but i think i need a hint
or a confirmation that i'm doing right or wrong
$\int_0^1 \ln(1+x^2) dx$
Merineth
Should i use u sub on entire thing ?
Because i can't seem to find any formula which allow me to integrate ln anywhere
That's a composition, so probably integration by parts
omg..
I can't believe i missed that
FML
i'm gonna fail lmao
..
$\ln(1+x^2) \times (x+\frac{x^3}{3}) - \int \frac{2x}{1+x^2}(x+\frac{x^3}{3})$
Merineth
no, you integrate dx in the first part
not $1+x^2$
Why am. I here
f(x)=ln(1+x^2) g(x)=1
Merineth
wdym?
You hopefully should have seen how you integrate ln(x) as an example somewhere...
I might have confused you by saying it's a composition, my bad
Tbh you can use integration by substitution too (it's a little more delicate)
...it's a similar type of problem here, just instead of pure ln(x), it's ln(1 + x^2)
Point is, when you do integration by parts, you do the derivative of one part and the antiderivative of the other
The derivative of ln(u) is much easier to deal with than ln(u) itself
And you can always do the antiderivative of a constant a, that's just (ax)
,rotate
Nope, that's not how IBP works
You got the derivative of ln(1+x^2) correct, but you need a product
I don't know anymore
slowly losing hope for my upcoming exam
I did this like yesterday or the day before
and i've already
forgotten or gotten it wrong
oh...
I should imagine there is an invisible 1
and use that as my primitve
yes
for your primitive?
$[\ln(1+x^2)x]_0^1 - \int_0^1 \frac{2x}{1+x^2}x dx$
What did dx ever do to you, you always forget it
Ok, but keep the bounds of integration
The first part also has bounds
Merineth


$[\ln(1+x^2)x]_0^1 - \int_0^1 \frac{2x}{1+x^2}x dx \
[\ln(1+x^2)x]_0^1 - \int_0^1 \frac{2x^2}{u} \frac{du}{2x} \
[\ln(1+x^2)x]_0^1 - \int_0^1 \frac{x}{u}du$
Merineth
$[\ln(1+x^2)x]_0^1 - \int_0^1 \frac{2x}{1+x^2}x dx \\
[\ln(1+x^2)x]_0^1 - \int_0^1 \frac{2x^2}{u} \frac{du}{2x} \\
[\ln(1+x^2)x]_0^1 - \int_0^1 \frac{x}{u}du$
```Compilation error:```! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again>
\xparse function is not expandable
l.50 [\ln(1+x^2)x]
_0^1 - \int_0^1 \frac{2x^2}{u} \frac{du}{2x} \\
A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)```

If you use a \function, you follow with {...}, not (...)
$\ln(x^2 + 1)$
@devout valley
it's not that 

$[ \ln(1+x^2)x ] - \int_0^1 \frac{2x}{1+x^2}x dx \
[ \ln(1+x^2)x ] - \int_0^1 \frac{2x^2}{u} \frac{du}{2x} \
[ \ln(1+x^2)x ] - \int_0^1 \frac{x}{u}du$
@devout valley
$[ \ln(1+x^2)x ] - \int_0^1 \frac{2x}{1+x^2}x dx \\
[ \ln(1+x^2)x ] - \int_0^1 \frac{2x^2}{u} \frac{du}{2x} \\
[ \ln(1+x^2)x ] - \int_0^1 \frac{x}{u}du$
```Compilation error:```! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again>
\xparse function is not expandable
l.50 [ \ln(1+x^2)x ]
- \int_0^1 \frac{2x^2}{u} \frac{du}{2x} \\
A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)```
I don't understand either lmao
Welp
ah well
Does it like fine atleast? 
Try breaking it into multiple texit commands
$\int_0^1 \frac{2x}{1+x^2}x dx\
\int_0^1 \frac{2x^2}{u} \frac{du}{2x}\
\int_0^1 \frac{x}{u}du$
Merineth

How do you have both x and u in the same integral, that's wrong
I was told that is ok?
It's not wrong, it's just that you can't find a result for it
Yeah i got stuck at that last part
$\int_0^1 \frac{2x^2}{1+x^2}dx$
got any advice for this?
I see that the numerators deriviate is 2x
oh wait
Merineth
Top heavy 
Top heavy?
The denominator is a sum, you want it in the numerator and then split the fraction
(because you already have x^2 in both)
[and you ideally do not want to be dealing with "polynomial fractions" when the degree of the numerator is not strictly less than that of the denominator...]
$2-\frac{2}{x^2+1}$
Merineth
Easy for you! 
Nice, but when you have a factor like this, you could just put it aside
$\int_0^1 \frac{2x^2}{1+x^2}dx = 2 \int_0^1 \frac{x^2 + 1 - 1}{1+x^2}dx = 2 \int_0^1 1 - \frac{1}{1+x^2}dx$
Nel
Do what you feel is easier, that's just an example
Merineth
Merineth
Do i include +C inside the []?
Technically it's there inside the brackets but it cancels out when you compute the difference
You probably forgot
somewhere but otherwise fine 

Yeah it's +arctan
integrals is superhard
one minor mistake and the entire thing is ruined
Can the chain rule be applied on integrals?
But in reverse?
That's what integration by substitution is 

i keep forgetting
ILATE
What's the difference between
A and E?
E is e^x ?
while A is poly?
Algebraic is polynomials, or fractions of
Yep, and also stuff like (x + 1)/(3x^2 + 6x + 9)
and e being exponentials, e^x, 2^x etc etc
$\int_1^e (ln(x))^2 dx = \int_1^e u^2xdu = [\frac{(ln(x))^2x^2}{2}-\frac{2ln(x)x^3}{6}]_1^e$
Does this seem reasonable?
Merineth
Nope, you haven't performed the usub properly
Hint ln(x) ' derivative is 1/x
Not 1
They have noted that but didn't complete the changing of variables, it seems, see the extra x that wasn't undone
Ah,ok
But before you do any integrating, make sure you've gotten rid of all appearances of x, if you didn't do that(!)
why? and how
The whole point of substitution is that the resulting integral you get, in terms of the new variable, is easier, but you cannot ignore x because it still depends on u
Oh, and also, limits too 
Think of it this way dx is a unit, for now you can only have one unit in your integral
So you want everything to be in terms of that unit
If this analogy is wrong, someone please correct me
$\frac{du}{dx} = \frac{1}{x} \implies dx = du*x$
Merineth
So now i have to change my x to the unit u before integrating?
Yes
And i set up the equation:
$u = ln(x)$ and solve for x?
Merineth
Yes, so you now express x in terms of a function of u
Ok so $x = e^u$
Merineth
$\int_1^e (ln(x))^2 dx = \int_1^e u^2 e^udu$
Merineth
A note: be very careful about the limits: those apply to the values of x, not of u, there are two ways to deal with that
Can't i just integrate and change u back to terms of x?
and then utilize the limits?
Either change them to be in terms of u, then you can always forget about them and just put them back in
Yes, you can
Or make it clear that they aren't in terms of u, so like $\int_{x=1}^{x=e} u^2 e^u \dd u$
@devout valley
If i wanted to use u
and integrate with u
how would i change them?
u = ln(1) ?
solve for 1?
Well solve for u, then replace that as the lower limit 
Similar replace the upper limit with ln(e), simplifying that down
$\int_1^e (ln(x))^2 dx = \int_{e^1}^{e^{e}} u^2 e^udu$
,calc log(1)
Like that?
It's ln, not e^
u = ln(e)
u = ln(x), so if you have x, you put it in ln to make u
What's ln(e) equal to? 
1
Okay so we just replace x with the limits in the equation and then replace our limits with that result?
u = ln(1) = 0
u = ln(e) = 1
Yep, and in the corresponding order 
$\int_{x=1}^{x=e} \ldots dx = $\int_{u=0}^{u=1} \ldots du$
After i have integrated with the new limits and gotten myself an answer, think that is fine? I don't have to solve based on dx?
Nel
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Meh, screw you compile error
You don't 

$\int_{x=1}^{x=e} \ldots dx = \int_{u=0}^{u=1} \ldots du$
Me everytime compilerror appears
Too late to change it
@devout valley
Why does the markdown have to obscure characters for 
I mean yeah, I don't pretend to be good at either LaTeX or maths 
but you are
I'm gonna start using this
It's all relative
Merineth
Beat me to it 
WA understands int_1^e
Don't give me the answer but
$\int_0^{pi/4} \frac{x}{cos^2(x)}dx = \int_0^{pi/4} x(cos(x))^{-2}dx$
Can i treat it as such?
yes, but 1/cos^2(x)=sec^2(x), that's a more convenient way of expressing it
Merineth
Trig, which is to avoid confusion I suggest you express it as $sec^2(x)$
Why am. I here
Do you know what the integral $\int \frac1{\cos^2(x)} \dd x$ is at least?
@devout valley
tan





