#help-28
1 messages · Page 100 of 1
Jps
according to notes definition region: if it is an open set together with none, some or all of its bounary points
oh ok
C come le ven diagram des ensembles
well we got a closed set here
cool, so just closed
so just closed and not polygonally connect and etc.
yep
okay thanks
and obviously not bounded so not compact
I think I understand
can I ask you more when I reach to other parts and mobius transformatinos
uh
i just started studying those
so i don't think i'll have the required knowledge
So you've done the polygonally connected right?
well i know what it means
Closed by @regal forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Bro tu connais quelques choses sur l'extension algebrique
J'en ais mare de déterminer les polynôme minimales pour les valeurs alpha engendre dans un K algebre
2-3 définitions et résultats mais pas plus
Frer j'ai un K[x] UN ss K ev de C engendre par alpha^n
Et n a valeur dans N
La question me demande de trouver les polynômes minimale pour valeur de alpha donné
Tu c l'astuce?
Le poly k-min est note Pk(alpha)
Et il est irréductible
@sharp dawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sharp dawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@wary walrus je rédigé ma solution
,reopen
Au Fuck la photo est encours toute tordu 😭😭😭
@sharp dawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i even simplify this
@warped sapphire Has your question been resolved?
Multiply by the conjugate of the numerator.
ok
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I did this work since I thought it might be helpful but not sure where to go from here.
maybe something like this?
@vocal crescent Has your question been resolved?
looks good
@vocal crescent Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vocal crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Notation question
Suppose I have a set ${A_1, A_2, ..., A_n}$ and I want to sum over all the possible combinations of 3 that can be made with this set. How would I write that with maths notation
Realist
Can you give an example of one combination just so I can see what you mean by a combination?
(A1, A2, A3)
Ok
order doesnt matter
Well you have n things to choose from
And order doesn't matter
So the operation you are looking for is a binomial coefficient $\binom{n}{k} = \frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$
Azyrashacorki
This gives the number of choices when picking k elements from a pool of n of them
That's not what you were asking though was it
It wasnt but thanks for trying
I'm trying to write a random variable as the sum of indicator functions
ok
Someone more knowledgeable in that field can probably give a more definitive answer
I have a probability question though based on this
@tropic portal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help on starting this
Use chain rule
The Chain Rule is a method for finding complex derivatives and is used all the time in Statistics and Machine Learning. This video breaks it down into its two simple pieces and shows you how they easily come together. We then use the Chain Rule to solve a common Machine Learning problem - optimizing the Residual Squared Loss Function.
For a com...
d/dx(sin(x+sin2x))= d(sin(x+sin2x)/d(x+sin2x) ×d(x+sin2x)/dx
A nested chain rule is just you keep going inward and inward until you can't take a derivative anymore. So in your case, it'd be
@white jungle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did I correctly anti differentiate (2x+3)^1/2?
Take the derivative to check
So I guess I didn’t do it right?
I don’t understand
How did you do that?
Using differentiation
You were suppose to take the derivative of that
What?
To check your answer
Oh
I don’t really understand the process of anti differentiation could you explain it to me
It's just the reverse process to taking the derivative
Yeah I get that but it’s easier to say it like that than to actually do it 
Like what should I be looking for during anti differentiation
For the problem you are doing, you're doing a technique called u sub
So how does that work?
So given f(x) = (2x + 3)^(1/2), you basically did u = 2x + 3, correct?
Yeah
The proper form is $\int (2x + 3)^{1/2} dx$
dldh06
So u = 2x + 3
Meaning that $\int (u)^{1/2} dx$
dldh06
Do you understand up to there?
Yeah I think so
I’ve only used the F(x) notation for anti derivatives haven’t used integral yet but I think I get it so far
So notice how that integral has both u and x in it but it needs to be uniform, meaning it should have one letter, in this case u, because we replaced the 2x + 3 with u
So to convert that dx in terms of u, you want to take the derivative of u = 2x + 3
So du/dx = 2
Then you rearrange that so it's in terms of dx
du/dx = 2 -> du/2 = dx
So far so good?
So we take u’ to be 2?
Yes because of what was said here
Okay yeah
Does this part make sense?
you want to take the derivative of u = 2x + 3
In terms of x, hence the derivative of u = 2x + 3 is du/dx = 2
Then you rearrange that so it's in terms of dx
Basically setting it equal to dx
So that's why du/dx = 2 -> du/2 = dx
So if du/dx = 2 then du = 2dx
du/2 = dx okay I get that algebra. But is there a reason we want to rearrange so it’s equal to dx?
So notice how that integral has both u and x in it but it needs to be uniform, meaning it should have one letter, in this case u, because we replaced the 2x + 3 with u
$\int (u)^{1/2} dx$
dldh06
oh okay
Because the original was $\int (2x + 3)^{1/2} dx$, it's pointless to go back to x (and because we're doing u sub)
dldh06
Right
So have du/2 = dx and the integral $\int (u)^{1/2} dx$, you substitute now, you know what dx is in terms of u
dldh06
$\int (u)^{1/2} \frac{du}{2}$
dldh06
Basically what I did there was replace the dx with du/2 because of the statement of du/2 = dx
Yeah
dldh06
oh you can do that?
Now you just integrate like normal, reverse power rule
Which part? The 1/2?
Yeah
Yes because it's a constant
Same logic with derivatives, you can pull out constants, and you can do the same with integrals
$$\frac{1}{2}\int (u)^{1/2} du$$
So you integrate and get $\frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{(u)^{3/2}}{3/2} + C\right]$
dldh06
Wait so what do we do with the du again?
Basically it's integrating $\frac{1}{2}\int (x)^{1/2} dx$
dldh06
Wdym
Like we have a du next to the u^1/2
You just integrate in terms of u
Meaning you leave things with u
Like this
When 1/2 is outside of the integral does that mean we don’t need to integrate that
Like this?
$\frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{(u)^{3/2}}{3/2} + C\right]\$
That's what you have, but remember that at the beginning we did u = 2x + 3
So you want to plug that back in to be in terms of x again so
$$\frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{(2x+3)^{3/2}}{3/2} + C\right]\$
dldh06
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Ah okay
This is the last step and you're done
You can simplify if needed
Then you end up with $$\left[\frac{(2x+3)^{3/2}}{3} + C\right]$$
dldh06
What about the 1/2?
.
dldh06
Oh
Yeah
But what about the constant C, we don’t distribute it to that to make 1/2*C?
Ah okay
Now take the derivative of this and you'll see that you'll get your original problem
Okay
But I gotta go, look up u sub
Closed by @twin wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What does assume the initial displacement have to do with this?
the object starts at position 0
I got it right but if I used initial displacement = 0 then I would be wrong
but you DID use initial displacement=0...
Where
by not adding anything to the integral
0 to 5
otherwise you'd have $s(5) = s(0) + \int_0^5 v \dd{t}$
?
Ann
btw you missed the dt
Oh yeah
But they ask for the distance travelled in the first 5 seconds the initial displacement shouldn’t affect it right
But even if it wasn’t zero it shouldn’t affect it
Because they don’t want you to add on the initial displacement they want the distance travelled in the first 5 seconds
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to disprove the last one?
i know the answer is D but yeah still
dispove 2x - y < 2xy ?
2x<2y
<=> not =
yeah more like showing it doesn’t always have to be true
i could try numbers but what’s the “slick way”
if there is any
i do not see any slick way
so i just simplify a bit and test with numbers?
yeah ig
Closed by @crystal cobalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im finding a formula for the sum $\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(i^{3}-4i\right)$
water beam
I wanna know if im correct
so i rewrote $\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(i^{3}-4i\right)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(i^{3}\right)-4\sum_{i=1}^{n}i$
water beam
and then
$\frac{n^{2}\left(n+1\right)^{2}}{4}-4\left(\frac{n\left(n+1\right)}{2}\right)=\frac{n^{4}}{4}+\frac{n^{3}}{3}-\frac{7n^{2}}{4}-2n$
water beam
did I do anything wrong here?
it's the right idea, we can double check arithmetic with WA
alright
,w sum from n=1 to k of (n^3-4n)
the only difference is the denominator in the n^3 twrm
they have n^3/2 and you have n^3/3
👍
thanks
looks good then nice work
Closed by @twin wolf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when can i use y=x to find f(x)=f-1(x)
USS-Enterprise
@eager crag Has your question been resolved?
yes
Graphically, $f(x)$ and $f^{-1}(x)$ are reflections about the y=x line.
USS-Enterprise
@eager crag Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help w/ no.7
I do not know how to start off
start by writing the equation that represents that first statement
@royal halo Has your question been resolved?
@royal halo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @royal halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
not quite, you need to be careful with your subtraction
(also write equations on a single line)
this is confusing
you need to subtract the whole angle, not just whatever term happens to appear first
Closed by @royal halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}(\frac{7x+10}{1+7x})^{x/3}$
chlamydia
Yep
@lusty leaf Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
2x-1 = |x+10|
You can plug into the original to check
|x+10| = ±(x+10) so u just need to plug those two in
Yes it’s the second pair
@runic oxide Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this a trapezium
?
Ye
k ty
tysm!
yw
@misty raven Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @misty raven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello!
Closed by @tacit blade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why f1 is equal to Tension
/rotate
,rotate
.rotate
can someone explain
help

why f_1=T
.close
Closed by @eager hinge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is happening
it wants you to move the arrow to show x>27/6?
yeah
oh damn i just realized i put the circle on the 5 not 4.5
andy yeah ik the arrows backwards
this should be right
yeah
careless mistake
i was panicking cause i was on my last submission thank you though
./close
.close
Closed by @spring vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could I somehow manipulate that top example into an answer that uses a different method than below? or not really
well you could u-sub
u-sub from here?
yes
could you also u-sub from the original?
yes
OK
so that would save time
it sounds like u-sub would be the fastest?
i would like to avoid any trig identity bullshit if possible
not sure if it's possible tho..
they both end up with -cscx
like the simple ones are fine but I don't know if my brain can effectively store all of these for an exam
remembering stuff sucks. and in the end the derivatives all boil down to expressing stuff as sin and cos and using product/chain rule
so they can all be solved using ibp or u-sub
so you can literally take any trig question, no matter how complex, and break it down to simple sin/cos using u-sub and/or integration by parts?
in principle, yes
that would make my life a heck of a lot easier. it's what you do too? or do you memorize all this shit
I look it up if I need it. because I don't have to write tests on that shit anymore
but it's what I would do if I had to
i wish exams would give trig tables, but since they don't I think I should use the u-sub / ibp methods to simplify trig expressions into extremely simple sin and cos only
i think it's a matter of practice to cement them in your mind
than straight memorization
you know all of them by heart? or still sometimes forget a few
all of what
these
line #6 is wrong btw int tan(x) dx is not sec^2(x)
only students know stuff like that by heart
lines 7 and 8 are redundant
as are most of these integral-derivative pairs
derivatives of sec and csc i don't bother memorizing cause i have never found a use for sec where 1/cos would not do
oh woah, you are right. i copied these from somewhere else, i gotta remember where..
might have been organic chemistry tutor.. i tend to find the most mistakes on his channel
why do you have the derivatives of cot and -cot on separate lines too
it's strange to me
why not also include 2 cot, 3 cot, 4 cot and 42069 cot as well
lol, i think it was just for practice, and for different +-
i may be missing some identities too
weak justification
why? i have all my notes here it's just to practice and write them down https://web.goodnotes.com/s/4MqLSJxlN9qvdabDYidlN8#page-8
GoodNotes app
it takes up space
and they sync on the web in real time with GoodNotes on iPad
it shows you have not grokked the linearity of the derivative
i will probably make flash cards out of these identities for furhter review
hoping to make it through a good chunk of these today
i watch at 2x speed but with notes it about averages out to same speed
you need to spend way more time on the first couple tbh
rather than trying to get through as many as you can
yeah, I'm re-watching the first one
3B1B helped me out a lot as well yesterday
in our course we learned Riemann Sums first day
good for visualizing the approximations, but we don't really use it in calculus, as we want the exact values
but I suppose the formula still holds true, if n is approaching infinity
is there any reason in particular that FTC Part 2 is taught before FTC Part 1?
like why not switch indefinite to Part 1, and definite to Part 2?
since definite is taught after indefinite
mine too, I think Discord bottleneck
the message takes a while to send, I see a grey text for about a minute and then it appears
yeah can you remind me which part of the ftc is called #1 and which one is #2?
wait, i thought FTC 2 is when there is a definite integral? but it's when limits are constant
FTC 1 includes a variable for a limit
Ann
maybe my prof has been teaching this wrong, I swear I heard definite integrals are FTC 1
indefinite integrals are FTC 2
"definite integrals are FTC1" is oversimplification
lol, another minor/annoying math thing that is set in stone now
why not f(x)?
why f(t)
oh you started with d/dx
hmmm
I gotta think about that..
so this is wrong?
amazing. yet this is first result on Google Image search...
Google should probably fix this and give less PageRank to CueMath
"the math expert"
@dense edge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help on this
I don't understand why if I add 0.5333 and 0.6500 it doesnt give me what it lists is my school thing messed up or am I?
How did you get 39?
by adding all known frequencys
I don't think that is how you are supposed to do it
It doesn't say no 3 is any kind of total
I think you should compute the relative frequecy first and use that to find the frequency
ok It was timed and I would like to understand it better
It said its 21 instead of 39
how did it go to that because someone in the past on this discord told me to add em all up
to find the unknown frequency
Okay, there is only one possible value of the third relative frquency. Find it
?
thats 0.3500
but I'm asking how did they find 21 for the frequency
I know how to do the rest entirely
I just don't understand fully the frequency stuff
ik RF and CRF
Can't you determine frequency from RF?
I'm not sure thats my question rn
ik for sure its 21 and everything else is correct
to determine RF you need frequency
So, relative frequency seems to be proportional to the frequency, which you also can tell by their names
so are we both lost on how to solve it or you know and your trying to explain? I've melted half my brain cells already trying to figuire out other stuff within the lesson today sorry if I'm getting confused here
the second alternative
sorry for the delay
You need to solve a proportion
Closed by @bright jewel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am not sure how much proof would be needed for this.
By definition of bounded, $(a_n)$ is bounded if there exist $M >0$ such that $|a_n| < M$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$. Negating this would give: "$(a_n)$ is unbounded if for all $M > 0$, there exist $n \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|a_n|> M$" which means that either $a_n > M$ or $a_n < -M$"
KN
Closed by @chrome idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@stray raven Has your question been resolved?
Use the hint
i didnt quite get how to start to move with it
can yoy help me
what he means by that f(theta) = Summation(- infinity to infinity) f hat(n) e^-intheta converges to f(theta) for the condition mentioned at the end of question
or the limit tend to infinity Nth partial sum f theta converges to f theta
Which part of that exactly don't you get?
Jeeze uhhh
this is the theorem that gave the corollary
Go back to the beginning where you do understand something
Do you know why uniformly continuous implies the limit is continuous
No it's not easy necessarily
Helping you is hard because you're not being precise what you want help with
yeah because lim x tends to c f(c) exists
for any c on interval
and using uniform contionus
for all |x-c|< theta
f(x)-f(c)< epsilon
which implies limit exist
That's not the right definition for your theorem
You have a sequence of functions
Find the definition that applies to the sequence converging uniformly
@stray raven Has your question been resolved?
@stray raven Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please I need help with this
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
rebonjour (rebonsoir ?)
f est continue et admet pour limite + infini et - infini dans l'intervalle ]a;b[
ok
pour la question 1), que veut dire que f(alpha)f(beta) < 0 ?
||l'un est strictement positif, l'autre strictement négatif||
Ça veut dire qu’ils ont deux signes opposé
exactement
Donc je dois montrer cela ?
oui
tu sais que f(x) -> + infini quand x tend vers alpha
et f(x) -> - infini quand x tend vers beta
et f continue
Alors f(alpha) positivé et f(beta) négative ?
hm non
x est dans l'intervalle ]alpha;beta[
alpha et beta sont donc exclus de l'intervalle
Ah oui c’est vrai
Le prof il avait dit qu’il faut utiliser la définition de la limite dans cet exo mais on a jamais vu ça car je suis en terminal
du coup j’ai chercher mais la définition en l’utilise l’orque la limite = un nombre
Pas l’infinie
ici
ça veut dire qu'il existe x dans ]a;b[ tel que f(x) soit aussi petit que l'on veut, mais aussi f(x) aussi grand que l'on veut
puisque f(x) tend vers les deux infinis
tu dois motnrer qu'ils existent
Ta pas une idée comment le montrer je suis vraiment confuse ?
tu peux remplacer x par alhpa et beta
Ouii bah en faite j’essaye d’utiliser tvi
ah oui, ça marche aussi
car avec la 2 question c’est forcément ça
oui
en fait pour la première question, puisque tu peux prends x tel que f(xà soit aussi petit que tu veux
tu peux dire que tu prends f(x) très petit négatif
enfin, je sais pas combien tu dois faire avec la rigueur
ahh je vois
Mais le problème que j’ai ici c’est que l’indice que le prof m’a donné c’est d’utiliser la définition de la limite
Mais je vois pas comment je peux l’exploiter icic
dire que f(x) tend + infini quand x tend vers a
avec f continue
avec x dans l'intervalle ]a;b[
ça signifie que pour tout réel M, il existe x dans cet intervalle que f(x) >= M
Oh un random
En mode je dois utilise cet définition
cocuou
ok, ben tu peux prende des e arbitraires
Vous êtes tous français ici haha
Epsilon ?
oui
Et le l ?
le l c'est la limite non ?
Non icic dans l’exercice c’est l’infinie
Mais attend t’es en quel classe ?
T’es en terminal toi aussi ?
Okay c’est pas grave
je pourrais pas t'aider plus que ça
merci pour l’aide quand même
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
No
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if log(3) = a and log2(10) = b then how do i simplify log 675 (you have to put both a and b)
ive got into
log 675
log (3^3)
3A + log (5^2) and then idk what to do
@lucid sierra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would it be differentiable if x = 0, f(0) = 5?
I'm hesitating between B and C here
Have you computed the left and right hand limits of the difference quotient?
Or tried to at least
yes
I plugged in -1 and 1
but since it's in the absolute value
it would be 4
limit from left and right both exist
but are not equal to 5
Wdym plugged in -1 and 1
I mean you'd need to do f(-1 + h) ... versus f(1 + h) ...
I actually did lim from the left and lim from the right
-1+h and 1+h would give 4+h for both
What do the points -1 and 1 have to do with this?
Did you try calculating and simplifying the limit in the question?
Show me your work
well it's asking for x=0 , so I tried getting the limit from the left and right
Because you'd need to define the limit differently for each side
The expression you need to look at is $$\frac{f(h) -f(0)}{h}$$
Morrow
Since |x| is equivalent to x for x > 0, likewise equivalent to -x for x < 0
hold on I'm a bit confused here
all I did was f(x)=5-|x|
f(0)=5-|0| = 5
f(0+h)= 5 - h
Not quite
h can be negative
can't just remove the absolute value
Unless you're looking at h > 0 first
in which case that's fine
And then you check for h < 0 afterwards
Yeah but to do that you may assume some properties about the "derivative" of f, which is what you're looking for already...
Like the derivative could vary a lot around 0, so that may be the best approach for any function if you don't know how it behaves
but all I'm looking for is whether the function is differentiable or not
Well continue this line of thought then
ok so would I just do 5 - h -5 /h?
which would be -h/h
but that doesn't really help right?
yes
(specifically h =/= 0)
because it cannot be 0 right
yeah we're first looking at h -> 0 from the positive direction
And we found that the limit is -1
We need to check the case where h -> 0 from the negative direction, and see if we get the same limit
lol discord formatting
so positive 1 / - 1
which would still be -1
so the limit does exist at -1
as long as it is not 0
I think you messed up there
did I?
f(h) = 5 -|h| = 5 - (-h)
it's -h/h right?
So f(h) - f(0) = (5 + h) - 5 = h
oh yes I did then
So it's h/h
-1 from the right
1/1?
ok so the limit does not exist then
because it has to be equal from left and right
Yeah, the limit does not exist
ok but how do I test differentiability then?
I know it's non-differentiable if there is a sharp corner
Well what's the definition of differentiable?
if the left and right limit exist?
wait no
if left and right limit = f(x) right?
but if left and right are not equal, then it can't differentiable
It's's just that the limit you calculated exists (if we're talking about differentiability at x=0 specifically)
And we found that it doesn't
oh they both exist but the limit does not
Yeah
Closed by @digital fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello this might be an easy question because I just started calculus but how can I say that this is equal to positive infinity without a calculator ?
x → 1⁻ ⇒ x < 1
Then
x² < 1² = 1
x² - 1 < 0
1 - x² > 0
Also, remember that in Limits, 1/0 = ±∞
Closed by @torpid oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
are these traces of a cone or a hyperboloid in one sheet?
the traces in x=k make me think its a hyperboloid in one sheet because the smallest radius the ellipses get still has some area (isn't a point like it would be in a cone)
but the traces in z=k make me think its a cone because of k=1, the intersecting lines
.close
Closed by @pine rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hii!, can someone double check my solution if I did it correclty? I was supposed to find the arithmetic series. Thank you!
use a calculator. 30 terms isnt many.
hmm? which item are you referring to if may I ask?^^
the ones which are computing the 25th term or something
you just go 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, ... for example
add 3 each time until u hit the 25th one
I did itt, it was -523
@muted kite Has your question been resolved?
hello?? can someone confirm
@muted kite Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i make a function that gets 4 times larger and it starts at 20k
孙悟空
because
Up to a multiplicative constant
what does that mean?
Like $C\cdot 4^x$
$20000*4^x$?
so if
If 20k is your money at x=0 then Yes
Closed by @late gorge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did he do this help
same base denominator
they wrote 2/3 as 4/6
because u can only add or subtract fractions with the same denoninator
then they simplified the denoninator
by dividing both the numerator and the denominator by 3
what do you notice about the numerators
oh numeraotr
sorry i read id denomitaor ...............
so
its weird patern in numeraotr
2
3 to 7
4
7 to 13
6
13 to 21
8
10
so 21 + 10
that is ur numerator
as for the denominator the pattern is pretty obvious it just adds by 2
its in their working out
they did middle term split
if you arent familiar with it, learn about quadratic equations and middle term split first
i have to go for now though
oh ok thank you
@livid nova Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @livid nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why are these not equal?
cos(0) = ?
1
the integral of cos isn't cos?
oh that's the mistake he made
lol okay i thought i was going crazy good
once u use sin it should flip the signs
Closed by @reef iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I could use a hint for what I should research?
I know the equation for tangent planes is
And so I thought the intersection was when f(x, y)=g(x, y)
So, I thought to put the two tangent plane equations equal to each other and then you'd somehow end up with the equation buuut no
@inner finch Has your question been resolved?
Nope..
@inner finch Has your question been resolved?
Nope..
Closed by @inner finch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
We haven't really talked about how the amplitudes, period, or midline truly affect the graph yet, but it's on my homework assignment. Could I get some help with this?
@spark field Has your question been resolved?
@spark field Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @spark field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do holes in a rational function get included in the domain?
For example, would the -2 get included or not?
because when simplified all the way, x+2 isn't in the denominator
No, it's not in the domain, even though it simplifies. You are studying the first function, not its simplified version
For example f(x) = x/x has as domain R - {0}

gotcha

so the domain would be (-inf, -2)U(-2,2)U(2,+inf)
In this case yes, well done
thanks 🙂
You did everything
.close
Closed by @spare ingot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just a simple question real quick. How do I calculate the fourth number, when I know the average of four numbers, but I am only told three numbers?
Do you know the formula for average?
Im not sure what you mean, but I know how to calculate the average of numbers given
sorry boss
I do not speak english as my first langauge so please dumb it down
What was your first language
Finnish
Did you learn a formula for average?
this paper does not have any formula for it
I can give you the numbers if that would help to make it easier
But did you learn one?
No
oh you have three numbers?
Yes
do you know the average?
^ then do you know the formula for average?
first what three numbers are you given?
5, 10 and 12
Do you know how to calculate average? Were you shown a method to find average?
yes Ill try to write it with the keyboard
ill use the numbers I said as an example
__1 * 5 + 1 * 10 + 1 * 12 __
3
that's the average of the three numbers but we are given the average of four
yes I do not have the formula for that
lets says we took the average of 5,10,12, and some other number x
It was not taught nor is it on the paper
how would you do this ^?
I think like so
1 * 5 + 1 * 10 + 1 * 12 + 1 * x
4
The process for finding average for 3 numbers, 4 numbers, even 100 numbers is the same, you just increase it
Yes and that equals the average given
yep! now that's the average of those four numbers, and we also know it must be 8
finding that number now is easy! 🙂
sorry I do not understand? I dont understand how I can calculate it when I do not have the fourth number
You have an equation
Do you know how to solve equations?
Like for example 3x + 4 = 19
Can you find x?
yes it is 5
yep! but now we have $\frac{5+10+12+x}{4}=8$
Denominator is 4
oh yeah good catch
Stumpman
Closed by @frail berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i do b
@stray oasis Has your question been resolved?
Move one equation to the other side such that it’ll be something like
ax^2 + bx + c = 0
@stray oasis Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stray oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone know how to find the equivalent resistor of this problem?
Do you know your resistors in series and parallel rules?
Move the wires
Start by the obvious ones and replace them with an equivalent.
r3 and r4 are in parallel. That will give you a new resistor. then r2 and this new one will be in series. You replace r2 and the combined r3, r4. Now this one is in parallel with r1...etc.
You can move things around like this
ohhh
