#help-28

1 messages · Page 96 of 1

supple jay
#

which means it will then

potent vine
#

I don't follow

supple jay
#

be - - = +

#

so its actually +1 on exponent

#

of p^1/3

quaint prawn
#

This is multiplying by p

supple jay
#

hmmmm

#

i would say its multiplying by 1/p

potent vine
#

from this you get $p^{4/3} = 9 \cdot 4^{1/3}$ now find p

quaint prawn
#

It’s not

glossy valveBOT
#

exophades

supple jay
#

oh

#

i just did that yes

#

wait

#

woah

#

huge enlightenment

#

so if divide by something that is negative exponent

#

its actualy multiply

#

cos its like 1/something

#

so divide reciprocates it

potent vine
#

slow down haha

quaint prawn
#

Yeah, you are dividing by a fraction. It just flips and becomes multiplication

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @supple jay

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

full forumBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bright heron
full forumBOT
proud marten
#

this all ik

#

not sure if helps

bright heron
#

thank you, but no. This is stuff from algebra 2

proud marten
#

yeah I just alg 3

simple ridge
bright heron
#

oh, ok

simple ridge
simple ridge
#

oh ok

#

i gtg now cya all

#

have a nice day/night everyone

exotic otter
bright heron
#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @bright heron

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

full forumBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean coral
#

@torn jolt , the one in the middle need to find the missing side

exotic otter
#

.status

#

.status

#

The bot down or smth?

lean coral
#

🤷‍♀️

exotic otter
#

Ok anyways

jagged saddle
#

that means parallel

exotic otter
#

That means parallel

lean coral
#

😭no way I’m so dumb sorry thanks

#

I wasn’t sure because it originated as 2 separate triangles forces

exotic otter
#

Bro just answered his question by asking his question

exotic otter
#

Can u do it now

lean coral
#

Wait, I’m not sure it is parallel, but I’m going to hand it in as it is, becuase those double arrows are on the one next to it too, but thanks

exotic otter
#

Aight

lean coral
#

It originates from the 2 triangles on the left

jagged saddle
#

i brute forced it with law of sines

exotic otter
#

Why are u making it so complicated

#

Anyways he got it

lean coral
#

I’m going to go along with it being parralell, it’s just a daily question we’ll go through in lesson

exotic otter
lean coral
#

However thanks. But it’s annoying, that angle at the bottom really throw me off.

lean coral
#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lean coral

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

full forumBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cosmic canopy
full forumBOT
cosmic canopy
#

evaluated this and got the wrong answer don't know why

#

oh wait i evaluated it wrong hold on

#

i got $\frac{61}{12}$ could someone check that

glossy valveBOT
cosmic canopy
#

nvm

#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @cosmic canopy

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

turbid thunder
#

could someone help me understand why the derivative of arccot is not the same as the reciprocal of the derivative of arctan?

stable plover
#

is the derivative of 1/x the same as the reciprocal of the derivative of x

#

also arccot and arctan are not reciprocals

full forumBOT
#

@turbid thunder Has your question been resolved?

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

digital fractal
#

For a) if I plug in -2 in x, I get 0/0, which is IF.

so I factor the denominator giving me (x+2) (x-2), which I can cancel one set of (x+2) from the numerator. I now get (x+2) / (x-2)

plugging in -2 for x, I get 0/-4, which is 0.

Would that mean that the limit does not exist or is it 0?

mighty ridge
#

if the limit is 0/-4, it's equal to 0 yeah

digital fractal
#

ok so I didn't do anything wrong

#

I must have misheard my professor, because I thought is the limit = 0, means there is no limit

#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @digital fractal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

digital fractal
#

.reopen

full forumBOT
#

digital fractal
#

sorry you were typing

mighty ridge
#

you definitely misheard yeah, might want to clarify it with your prof

digital fractal
#

so is it possible that I heard for example

#

16/0 = DNE that the limit does not exist then?

mighty ridge
#

yes

digital fractal
#

ok maybe that's what I got confused by

#

thanks

#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @digital fractal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stiff swan
#

when someone asks me to add this, does it mean they expect me to transpose either A or B, or the answer is just DNE?

left bone
#

DNE

full forumBOT
#

@stiff swan Has your question been resolved?

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vernal ocean
#

whats does the letter "d" before the sigma motion does (to clarify I want to know in general what a letter before a sigma motion does)

full forumBOT
#

@vernal ocean Has your question been resolved?

full forumBOT
#

@vernal ocean Has your question been resolved?

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tulip citrus
full forumBOT
tulip citrus
#

someone please help

#

i almost gotta go and this is due tommorow

light sonnet
tulip citrus
#

well

#

could we see since i have a hard time remembering

#

also i think this is different from the equation im used to

light sonnet
tulip citrus
#

isnt that gonna take ages?

#

also i dont know which help it was on

light sonnet
#

The message history takes you back to that message

tulip citrus
#

oh wait i thought you meant scroll to it

light sonnet
tulip citrus
#

could we review atleast 4 tho

#

number 4

light sonnet
#

You want to solve for w, what's the first step you should do?

tulip citrus
#

+4 - 4

#

cancels out

#

and 52 + 4

#

56

#

but what do i do with the fraction

#

thats where i get stuck

light sonnet
#

What's the equation you have now?

tulip citrus
#

56 = 8/5W

light sonnet
#

$56 = \frac{8}{5}w$

glossy valveBOT
#

dldh06

light sonnet
#

That's the same as $56 = \frac{8w}{5}$

glossy valveBOT
#

dldh06

light sonnet
#

Do you see what you can do now?

tulip citrus
#

uh

#

8/5W * 5?

light sonnet
#

Yes

#

Now you have?

tulip citrus
#

W is left

#

56 * 5

#

280

#

W = 280

#

so then i gotta check my answer

light sonnet
#

No

#

You weren't done

light sonnet
tulip citrus
#

wait what

light sonnet
#

You have $56 = \frac{8w}{5}$, if you multiply by 5, yes that cancels out with that 5 in the fraction but what about the 8?

glossy valveBOT
#

dldh06

tulip citrus
#

now that

#

thats where i get very confuse

#

confused*

light sonnet
#

Well if you multiplied by 5, the 5's cancel like is said, so you end up with 56 * 5 = 8w, right?

tulip citrus
#

ah

#

so then 56 * 5 = 280

#

280 = 8w?

light sonnet
#

Yes

tulip citrus
#

alright then

#

ill try doing these now

full forumBOT
#

@tulip citrus Has your question been resolved?

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ashen hill

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

twilit pebble
#

i am having trouble finding the exponents for the numerator and the denominator

twilit pebble
full forumBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
twilit pebble
#

2

narrow helm
#

What's causing you trouble?

twilit pebble
#

tbh idk how to explain it

#

i cancelled out a

#

i found the exponent for b

#

but for problem the answer is a fraction with b in the numerator and the denominator and it confuses me

#

sry for bad explanation

narrow helm
#

what did you get?

twilit pebble
#

1/b^16

narrow helm
#

you know that b^(0) = 1?

twilit pebble
#

ohHhhHHh

#

i forgor

#

my bad

#

ty

narrow helm
#

do you need help with anything else?

#

@twilit pebble

twilit pebble
#

no im good

#

thx

narrow helm
twilit pebble
#

ok

#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @twilit pebble

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sharp nebula
full forumBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
sharp nebula
#

y' = 3a x^2 + 2bx + c

#

How do I go about this?

torn jolt
#

what does a local maximum entail

sharp nebula
#

When y'=0
?

torn jolt
#

yes

tacit granite
#

you answered the question

torn jolt
#

you know y' = 0 for x = 2

sharp nebula
#

Yes

torn jolt
#

and y = 4 for x = 2 as well

sharp nebula
#

Uhhh

#

y= 4 when subbed into the original

tacit granite
#

so 3ax^2+2bx + c = 2a*4+2b*2+c = 0

sharp nebula
#

Y is it 2bx4

narrow helm
#

first of all, the inflection point lies at the origin

#

so that means the curve passes through the origin (0,0)

#

so you can get d from this

tacit granite
#

** = italic

sharp nebula
sharp nebula
#

X=2

tacit granite
#

cause x^2

#

oh

narrow helm
#

the maximum point is (2,4)

sharp nebula
#

Ye

narrow helm
#

so the curve passes through (2,4)

#

so x=2 should yield y = 4

#

you'll get a relation in a,b and c from there

#

then f'(2) = 0

#

you'll get another relation

#

then what about point of inflection?

sharp nebula
sharp nebula
narrow helm
#

y'' what?

#

=?

sharp nebula
#

6ax + 2b

narrow helm
#

i mean when does POI occur?

sharp nebula
#

(0,0)

narrow helm
#

ahh

#

the condition

sharp nebula
#

Eh?

narrow helm
#

like maximum occurs when f'(x) = 0

#

so when does POI occur?

sharp nebula
#

y" = 0

narrow helm
#

yes

#

exactly

#

so do it, and that should give you the value of b

torn jolt
narrow helm
#

then solve those equations you got earlier

sharp nebula
#

B is 0

#

Now I only hv
8a + 4b + 2c = 4
B=0

narrow helm
#

you have another

#

f'(2) = 0

sharp nebula
#

Ahhh

#

Ok I see it now

#

Thanks so much y'all

#

:))

#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sharp nebula

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

charred geode
#

Guys what are the number of ways i can arrange these letters :
A m b a t a k u m

onyx glen
#

are the A and a different or the same

charred geode
#

Different

onyx glen
#

ok so then you have 2 letters repeated twice each (a and m) and 5 unique letters (Abtku)

charred geode
#

Yes sir

onyx glen
#

don't call me "sir" please.

charred geode
#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @charred geode

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dim wing
#

i need help about radicals and surds

full forumBOT
dim wing
#

more specifically this :

#

<@&286206848099549185>

full forumBOT
#

Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.

dim wing
#

ok

swift fulcrum
#

!status

full forumBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
swift fulcrum
#

!show

full forumBOT
#

Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.

dim wing
#

i am stuck in trying to simplify them

#

i dont where to begin

#

basically

#

?

#

@dim wing

torn jolt
torn jolt
dim wing
#

what?

dim wing
torn jolt
dim wing
#

ah ok

dim wing
torn jolt
#

its all the same?

dim wing
#

how?

torn jolt
dim wing
#

i tried

#

i dont understand it at all

torn jolt
#

see this as an example

#

theres a square term in the denom, and we dont like and thats what the question is asking us to do too, remove it, to remove a sqrt we need to square the square root (3 - sqrt 2) (3 + sqrt 2) = (a -b ) (a+b)

torn jolt
dim wing
#

ah ok

torn jolt
#

and you dont have the sqrt anymore 🙂

dim wing
#

ok thx

#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dim wing

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

full forumBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

chilly mason
#

hey guys can u help me with these problems thanks

wide wind
#

Are you familiar with sin, cos and tan?

tacit siren
#

Didn't u already put in help forum

narrow helm
#

this is not the only problem

#

there's more

#

so I redirected them here

chilly mason
chilly mason
chilly mason
#

is there any ways we do these problems without calculator?

wide wind
#

Nothing's coming up in my mind.

chilly mason
#

what about the other problems?

steep flame
wide wind
#

Hmm, I'm not familiar enough with trigonometry. But the second one, Billy's jogging distance, what would you do if those terms were singular? Like x and y.

narrow helm
#

1st one cant be done without a calculator, unless you know those values too

chilly mason
chilly mason
wide wind
#

Probably, but it seems to be solving x.

chilly mason
#

do u know the solution?

#

just share it, i have the answers

wide wind
#

x=7/2

#

Does that seem right?

full forumBOT
# wide wind x=7/2

As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.

narrow helm
#

for the first one, do you know the trigonometric ratios?

#

@chilly mason

chilly mason
narrow helm
#

so you can do the first one?

chilly mason
# wide wind x=7/2

Wait, i gotta sleep, i will continune tmrw, remind me tho, its late in my country here, i m supposed to sleep like 2-3 hours ago

chilly mason
narrow helm
#

ok, cool

#

then which ones are left now?

chilly mason
#

The under one

chilly mason
narrow helm
#

jogging?

chilly mason
# narrow helm

Yea i dont even understand the sentence itself how come it become cycled after he say he jogs

narrow helm
#

or just 0? because he just jogged?

full forumBOT
#

@chilly mason Has your question been resolved?

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

latent aspen
full forumBOT
latent aspen
#

How do I change bounds from polar to cartesian

#

After drawing the graph, the region of integration is between circle of radius 2 and radius of 4 in the 2nd quadrant.

#

Im p sure the x bounds should be from [-4,0] but I am conflicted on how to write the y bounds.

#

I have tried splitting it into 2 parts: but im not sure this is correct

full forumBOT
#

@latent aspen Has your question been resolved?

latent aspen
#

<@&286206848099549185>

full forumBOT
#

@latent aspen Has your question been resolved?

severe linden
latent aspen
#

oh really?

severe linden
#

why the doubts

latent aspen
#

🤷‍♂️

severe linden
latent aspen
#

haha thanks for the confirmation

severe linden
#

you are welcome

latent aspen
#

how do i close?

severe linden
#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @severe linden

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tough scaffold
#

Is this method 100% legit?

full forumBOT
copper cape
#

yes

quaint prawn
#

100% legit

copper cape
#

yes

quaint prawn
#

@supple jay can you verify?

tough scaffold
#

@supple jay can you verify?

noble pivot
#

@supple jay can you verify?

torn jolt
noble pivot
#

how is it legit?? the answer is 3/10

torn jolt
#

Non por favor, the answer is 0.3

noble pivot
#

seniõr after further calculations I arrived at 30%

torn jolt
#

After further information from the FBI i have reached the conclusion that the answer is
The division of the smaller root by the larger root, in the polynomial
x² - 13x + 30

full forumBOT
#

@tough scaffold Has your question been resolved?

full forumBOT
#

@tough scaffold Has your question been resolved?

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

torn jolt
#

I need help with 2D motion

full forumBOT
woven knoll
#

Send problem and what you exactly need help with

torn jolt
#

I believe the answer to this problem is c for $(a)$ and $ - \pi$ for $(b)$

#

wait

glossy valveBOT
#

Replaced by new brandon H

torn jolt
#

am i correct?

#

I don't really know what they mean by

#

airplane's displacement during this period

#

I think it's just the change in position

#

This seems to easy, that's why i'm confused

woven knoll
short bridge
#

Direction won't just be an angle. You need to find the unit vector across the displacement vector.

torn jolt
#

so

#

the direction is a vector

#

so

#

just

#

$$\vec{d} = -c \hat{j}$$

glossy valveBOT
#

Replaced by new brandon H

torn jolt
#

oh

#

it's

#

$-\hat{j}$

glossy valveBOT
#

Replaced by new brandon H

torn jolt
#

wait

#

i

#

j is up NOOO

#

Ok

#

TY everyone

#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sacred canopy

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

torn jolt
#

If i wanted to solve this problem would I just visually integrate then divide by time?

torn jolt
#

but its a vector peepoHmm

#

😭 too many steps

spiral vigil
#

take them one at a time

full forumBOT
#

@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?

torn jolt
#

.close

#

ty

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sacred canopy

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

full forumBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

left fossil
#

could anyone give their suggestion as to what topic about functions I can use and study for this

silver thorn
#

you gotta give more than that? i dont understand whats going on

#

what are you doing exactly

exotic otter
full forumBOT
#

@left fossil Has your question been resolved?

left fossil
#

My Teacher is basically asking us to come up with any topic be it a real life situation or just anything at all as long as it relates to functions

left fossil
silver thorn
#

ok but whats the task?

#

are you writing an essay?

#

doing a powerpoint?

#

writing a textbook?

#

assuming its for a indivudal research topic, It kinda of depends on your level of math knowledge

#

if this si a grade 12 precalc course, you could try to learn about integration or derivatives

#

if its algebra you could talk about the trig functions or logarithms

#

i mean you could even talk about computer programs and how you write very abstract function all the time when coding

full forumBOT
#

@left fossil Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @left fossil

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tawny birch
#

Hey II was thinking the answer was c because

#

using m=e and b=0

#

when they are set equal to each other they are the same

#

and the dervatives are the same on both sides...

#

am i thinking correctly?

#

I just wanted to make sure its correct and im not going down the wrong path LOL

atomic blade
#

Yup you're fine

tawny birch
#

appreciate it!

#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tawny birch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

torn jolt
#

hi

#

.reopen

full forumBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

normal thicket
full forumBOT
normal thicket
#

Can I write it like matrix?

spiral vigil
#

sure? matrix times ⟨a,b,c⟩ column vector

quaint prawn
#

@normal thicket ⚔️

normal thicket
#

a1,0,0
b1+c1, b2+c2, b3+c3
a1+b1+c1, a2+b2+c2 a3+b3+c3

#

Two rows are the same so many of them will be 0

#

Am I on the right path?

#

, rotate

glossy valveBOT
normal thicket
#

@spiral vigil

spiral vigil
#

wait

#

i don't understand what's happening at all here

#

is there more to this question?

normal thicket
#

Nothing

#

More

#

Maybe I wrote wrongly in matrix

spiral vigil
#

trying to figure out what $[\vec a.\vec b.\vec c]$ even means

glossy valveBOT
#

hayley!

normal thicket
#

Ohh wait

#

I got this

#

2[abc]

#

Sorry for a messy work

#

Mo it's 0

#

@spiral vigil

#

Any short method?

spiral vigil
#

you might be able to rearrange it so stuff cancels

#

i don't really know this operator

normal thicket
#

What??

normal thicket
#

@spiral vigil

#

<@&286206848099549185>

quaint prawn
full forumBOT
#

@normal thicket Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @normal thicket

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

full forumBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pseudo cape
#

Does anyone have a {\em hint} on proving Menelaus' theorem? \ It states that in the geometric construction below, we have that [\overline{AZ} \cdot \overline{BX} \cdot \overline{CY} = \overline{AY} \cdot \overline{BZ} \cdot \overline{CX}.]

pseudo cape
#

@polar valve suggested to draw perpendiculars from A, B and C and then use the intercept theorem

#

But wouldn't it basically look like this?

#

We can't really use the intercept theorem (or similar triangles) on that, can we?

tacit granite
#

use similarity

pseudo cape
tacit granite
#

on triangles

pseudo cape
tacit granite
#

I don't really remember

#

Because I'm not in geometry

#

but Helpers should know i guess

pseudo cape
full forumBOT
#

@pseudo cape Has your question been resolved?

pseudo cape
#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @pseudo cape

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rotund birch
#

So far, i showed that this is true when $n=2$, since $2 \in P$ and cant be expressed as $ 2 = ab$ for $a,b \in S$
\
\
Then i assumed that for an arbitrary integer $k \leq 2$ that i is either in $P$ or can be expressed as $i=xy$ for every integer i with $2 \leq i \leq k$
\
\
Then i attempted to show that either $k+1 \in P$ OR $k+1=x_1y_1$ for some $x_1,y_1 \in S$
\
\
I begun with showing that when $k=2$, this holds true because $k+1 =3 \in P$ (and it cant be expressed as $k+1= x_2y_2$ for some
$x_2,y_2 \in S$
\
Similiarly, i showed that this is true for k=3
\
\
So i assumed that $k \leq 4$
Therefore $ 2 \leq k \leq k$
\
\
And because of this, either $k \in P$ or $k = sr$ for some $s,r \in S$
\
\
From here i considered two cases:

Case 1: Let $ k \in P$ where $4 \leq k$
\
Since 2 is the only even prime and $k \leq 4$, k must be odd.
\
Since k is odd, k+1 is even and can be expressed as $k+1= a_1b_1$ for some $ a_1b_1 \in S$
\
\
Case 2: Let $ k=sr$ for some $s,r \in S $
\
Well since $s\leq 2$ and $r \leq 2$, it follows $k \leq 4$ without a need for our assumption.
If either s or r is odd, k+1 will be even, which can be expressed as multiplication of two elements from S
\
How can i show k+1 is true for the cases where k+1 is odd?

glossy valveBOT
#

Cyrenux

LaTeX source sent via direct message.
```Compilation error:```! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again> 
                   !
l.63 ...1y_1$ for some $x_1,y_1 \in S$   \hspace (
                                                  1)
A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
(If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
look up `weird error' in the index to The TeXbook.)```
proper hawk
#

umm

#

Since k is odd, k+1 is even and can be expressed as $k+1= a_1b_1$ for some $ a_1b_1 \in S$

glossy valveBOT
#

WhereWolf(ping if needed)

proper hawk
#

you need to show a1,b1 are in P, not S

rotund birch
#

Also bruh this is so painful to edit in mobile

#

With all the low fps stuff

#

Resending my work if needed to be read again:

proper hawk
#

showing they are in S is not enough

#

I worded that poorly sry

rotund birch
#

So far, i showed that this is true when $n=2$, since $2 \in P$ and cant be expressed as$ 2 = ab$ for $a,b \in S$
\
\
Then i assumed that for an arbitrary integer $k \geq 2$ that i is either in $P$ or can be expressed as $i=xy$for every integer i with $2 \geq i \geq k$
\
\
Then i attempted to show that either $k+1 \in P$ OR $k+1=x_1y_1$ for some $x_1,y_1 \in S$
\
\
I begun with showing that when $k=2$, this holds true because $k+1 =3 \in P$ (and it cant be expressed as $k+1= x_2y_2$ for some
$x_2,y_2 \in S$
\
Similiarly, i showed that this is true for k=3
\
\
So i assumed that $k \geq 4$
Therefore $ 2 \geq (k) \ geq k$
\
\
And because of this, either $k \in P$ or $k = sr$ for some $s,r \in S$
\
\
From here i considered two cases:

Case 1: Let $ k \in P$ where $4 \geq k$
\
Since 2 is the only even prime and $k \geq 4$, k must be odd.
\
Since k is odd, k+1 is even and can be expressed as $k+1= a_1b_1$ for some $ a_1b_1 \in S$
\
\
Case 2: Let $ k=sr$ for some $s,r \in S $
\
Well since $s\leq 2$ and $r \leq 2$, it follows $k \leq 4$ without a need for our assumption.
If either s or r is odd, k+1 will be even, which can be expressed as multiplication of two elements from S
\
How can i show k+1 is true for the cases where k+1 is odd?

glossy valveBOT
#

Cyrenux

rotund birch
#

That was way harder than it should have been

#

Brb switching to pc

rotund birch
#

also bruh i just realized this is the first work i sent, where i confused geq with leq , let me fix that again

#

So far, i showed that this is true when $n=2$, since $2 \in P$ and cant be expressed as $ 2 = ab$ for $a,b \in S$
\
\
Then i assumed that for an arbitrary integer $k \geq 2$ that i is either in $P$ or can be expressed as $i=xy$for every integer i with $2 \leq i \leq k$
\
\
Then i attempted to show that either $k+1 \in P$ OR $k+1=x_1y_1$ for some $x_1,y_1 \in S$
\
\
I begun with showing that when $k=2$, this holds true because $k+1 =3 \in P$ (and it cant be expressed as $k+1= x_2y_2$ for some
$x_2,y_2 \in S$
\
Similiarly, i showed that this is true for k=3
\
\
So i assumed that $k \leq 4$
Therefore $ 2 \leq (k) \leq k$
\
\
And because of this, either $k \in P$ or $k = sr$ for some $s,r \in S$
\
\
From here i considered two cases:

Case 1: Let $ k \in P$ where $4 \leq k$
\
Since 2 is the only even prime and $k \leq 4$, k must be odd.
\
Since k is odd, k+1 is even and can be expressed as $k+1= a_1b_1$ for some $ a_1b_1 \in S$
\
\
Case 2: Let $ k=sr$ for some $s,r \in S $
\
Well since $s\leq 2$ and $r \leq 2$, it follows $k \leq 4$ without a need for our assumption.
If either s or r is odd, k+1 will be even, which can be expressed as multiplication of two elements from S
\
How can i show k+1 is true for the cases where k+1 is odd?

glossy valveBOT
#

Cyrenux

rotund birch
#

(repost)

proper hawk
#

actually you don't have to do two cases

#

k+1 is either prime or can be factored into smaller numbers

#

and those number are either prime or can be factored into even smaller numbers

#

they keep decreasing, but you eventually hit 2 and 3

#

thus a prime factorization is always possible

#

try to write that rigororously in set language

rotund birch
#

(btw im not afk, im thinking as i havent expressed prime numbers in set language before)

#

and well i wont always hit 2 and 3 , since nor a nor b can be 1 on definition of set S, 5 is element of P as well

#

since 5 cannot be expressed as 5=ab for some a,b in S

#

but i get your point

proper hawk
#

I mean the numbers can't be composite forever, as it's getting smaller every time we factor it

rotund birch
#

so i should have assumed that either k is a prime number OR k is a composite number which can be expressed as multiplication of prime numbers p1,p2,p3...pn (for n>1)

#

instead of just assuming n=ab for some a,b in S

#

right

proper hawk
#

umm

#

k+1

#

since you assumed k

rotund birch
#

oops yeah k=ab for some a,b in S

rotund birch
#

im talking about my assumptions currently, not what im showing

#

i think my assumption is wrong/not enough

proper hawk
#

h

#

oh

#

yeah that's the assumption

rotund birch
#

splitting this into 2 cases is so free though lol

#

since i picked $k \geq 4$ , if k is prime then it must be odd, thus k+1 is even

glossy valveBOT
#

Cyrenux

proper hawk
#

umm

rotund birch
#

but what do i do now

proper hawk
#

it really doesn't matter k+1 is even or odd

rotund birch
#

oh

#

so i should abort this thinking style

proper hawk
#

yeah

rotund birch
#

but then i have no idea how to show that k+1 is composite

proper hawk
#

you don't

#

k+1 is prime or composite

#

either

#

prime or composite

rotund birch
#

oh i meant, i dont know how to show that it can be expressed as multiplication of set P's elements

proper hawk
#

.

#

didn't I just told you

#

k+1 is either prime or composite

rotund birch
#

thats not what im looking for though

proper hawk
#

if it's prime then we're done

#

if k+1 is composite, then it's product of two smaller numbers a and b

rotund birch
#

i need to show that k+1 is either element of a prime or can be expressed as multiplication of P's elements

proper hawk
#

since a and b is smaller then k, a and b can be written as product of primes.

#

QED

rotund birch
#

ohh

#

i thought you need to show more symbolically

#

🤦

#

but yeah if i knew i couldnt show more i would have tried to type something like this, thanks

#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @rotund birch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

rotund birch
#

(i havent done many proofs involing primes so i wasnt sure if that would have been enough)

full forumBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

outer tree
#

Hello, can someone help me with this question please?

outer tree
#

When I try to do it I’m not getting the same values, this is my work

#

On the back of the textbook , the table for the interval and avg velocity is

unreal fiber
#

Are you using radians?

#

Yep seems like youre using degrees instead of radians

outer tree
#

ohhhh, that's why the steps weren't working. Thank you!

#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @outer tree

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

nimble crane
full forumBOT
nimble crane
#

!status

full forumBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
nimble crane
#

1

#

I'm having a really hard time trying to prove that 1+1 = c

#

or that 1+c = 0

#

I can prove that c*c = 1 if I can prove either of these facts

ornate bobcat
#

Ok so it is like you have a 3 base number system

#

0,1,c

In fields like this the first element usually is the place holder which is zero in this case

#

Meaning saying
0 + 0 will be 0

#

The next number which is 1 is the first number that we can use operations with

#

Saying
0 + 1 = 1

#

Now imagine if we are on the binary field

#

If we said 1+1

#

What would be the result

#

It will be 10

#

Because there's no other element in the binary system except
(0,1)

#

But if there is another element in a field
Like that one
{0,1,c}
We can say
1+1 = c
In that field

nimble crane
#

I'm not exactly seeing how that helps me prove it though.

ornate bobcat
#

Hmm I don't know also how can I prove it using math language

#

I thought that this the way the we should prove it

#

1+1 = C
Because adding one to a term in any field takes us to the next term if it is not the last term

#

As the field also has a finite number of elements
Adding 1 to the final term in it will take you all the way to the first element meaning
1+c = 0

nimble crane
#

<@&286206848099549185>

full forumBOT
#

@nimble crane Has your question been resolved?

full forumBOT
#

@nimble crane Has your question been resolved?

nimble crane
#

<@&286206848099549185>

full forumBOT
#

@nimble crane Has your question been resolved?

nimble crane
#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @nimble crane

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frank grove
#

hi

full forumBOT
frank grove
#

I would want some help

#

so

#

heres an equation :

#

log3(27) + log4(64)

#

So I can convert this to

#

3 + 3 right?

#

and then so

#

log3(27) + log4(64) = 6

#

am i correct?

hot herald
#

not an equation but
yes

frank grove
#

k

#

one more

#

question

#

so

#

a+b = 2

#

a+c = 3

#

b+c = 4

#

so whats a+b+c = ?

#

so is this right?

#

so first i do

#

a+b = b+c

#

and then I subsitude

hot herald
#

is already wrong

frank grove
#

wait

#

let me try sometihng

#

a+b = 2 right?

#

k

#

so

#

2 + c = ?

#

im confused

hollow sable
#

When you have cyclic sums or products you should always ||try to add or multiply everything up||

hollow sable
frank grove
#

im not getting it

hollow sable
#

Ok what about the variables

frank grove
#

a+b+b+c+a+c?

hollow sable
#

Simplify

frank grove
#

a+a+b+b+c+c

#

2a+2b+2c

hollow sable
#

Keep going

#

Yep

frank grove
#

then?

#

2a+2b+2c = 9?

hollow sable
#

Yes

#

Now what do you do

frank grove
#

then divide all of them?

hollow sable
#

Yes

frank grove
#

so divide it by 8?

hollow sable
#

What

frank grove
#

like

hollow sable
#

Why 8???

frank grove
#

I summed the 2's up

#

2 x 2 x 2 = 8

#

so i dont need to divide 2 three times

#

so 9 divided by 8 is 1.125

#

so that means a+b+c = 1.125

hollow sable
#

No

frank grove
#

?

hollow sable
#

If 2a=1 what is a

frank grove
#

1/2

#

a = 1/2

hollow sable
#

If 2a+2b=2 what is a+b

frank grove
#

2/4

#

wait no

hollow sable
#

I think you are confused

frank grove
#

Wait

#

Im dumb

#

2/2

#

1/2

#

k

#

1/2

hollow sable
#

No

frank grove
#

??

#

don't you subsitude

hollow sable
#

That’s only when you multiply

hot herald
#

2/2? 1/2? which one?

frank grove
#

2a/2 = a

#

though

#

so then you do it for the other side

hollow sable
#

So if I had 2a * 2b=4, I would divide by 2 * 2

frank grove
#

2/2

hot herald
#

you should divide based on factors, not how many times a number happens to appear on one side

frank grove
#

$ 3x + 4 = 28 $

hollow sable
#

But if I had 2a+2b=4 I would divide by 2 since 2a+2b=2(a+b)

frank grove
#

$3x+4 = 28$

glossy valveBOT
#

Agent78

frank grove
#

bro

#

k

frank grove
#

$3x = 24$

glossy valveBOT
#

Agent78

frank grove
#

dont you divide

#

both sides?

hot herald
#

you divide by what's being multiplied to what you're trying to isolate

#

which is 3 in this case

frank grove
#

were figuring out whats a+b+c

hot herald
#

$\boxed{\text{what}?} \times (a+b+c) = 2a + 2b + 2c$

glossy valveBOT
#

ℝam()n()v

frank grove
#

2?

hot herald
#

yes

frank grove
#

$\boxed{\text{what}?} \times (a+b+c) = 2a + 2b + 2c$

glossy valveBOT
#

Agent78

frank grove
#

hm

#

so your saying

#

9 = 2(a+b+c)

hot herald
#

$2a + 2b + 2c = 9 \
2\underbrace{(a+b+c)}_{x} = 9$

glossy valveBOT
#

ℝam()n()v

frank grove
#

so

#

9 = 2(a+b+c)

hot herald
#

you divide by what's being multiplied to what you're trying to isolate
which is 2 here

frank grove
hot herald
#

no

frank grove
#

i meant 4.5

hot herald
#

yes

frank grove
#

hm

#

so this is practice

#

k

#

$3a + 7b + 9c = 25
2\underbrace{(a+b+c)}_{x} = 25$

#

$3a + 7b + 9c = 25 \

2\underbrace{(a+b+c)}_{x} = 25$

glossy valveBOT
#

Agent78
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

frank grove
#

k thanks

#

.close

full forumBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @frank grove

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

deep hull
#

the goal in this question is to find d using only 5 angle theorems

deep hull
#

im struggling to even know where to start

#

ive spent a lot of time looking at it

#

the quadrilateral that contains 58 degrees and d looks like a parallelogram but none of the sides are marked as parallel or congruent

#

theres a lot of other questions like this one that ive already done

#

im just struggling with this one

tacit siren
#

The dashed lines are marking congruent sides I think

deep hull
#

im aware yeah

#

but it doesnt help me at all

#

as far as i can tell

tacit siren
#

uhh are you allowed to use the fact that isosceles triangles have equal base angles??

deep hull
#

i can mark the angles as congruent but it doesnt acomplish anything

#

yeah thats ITT

tacit siren
#

yeh it soes

deep hull
#

what does it do

tacit siren
#

OK so

#

Label the angles of the isosceles triangles as theta1 and theta2 first or w/e you wanna call them ur choicw

deep hull
#

uh huh

tacit siren
#

What is theta1+d+theta2

#

Label them in ur diagram as such if it helps

#

Oops

#

I forgot to say "base" anglea

#

We're just calling the base angles of one triangle theta1 and of the other theta2

deep hull
#

like this?

tacit siren
#

yeee

#

x and y are good choices

deep hull
#

yeah x + d + y = 180

#

actually wait does it

tacit siren
#

Ye

deep hull
#

i mean it looks like it but what if the diagram isnt to scale

#

theres no markings for it being 180

tacit siren
#

They sum up to a line's angle tho

#

well hmm ic now

deep hull
#

what if this is more accurate

tacit siren
#

Yeh guess we can't assume it but we don't need it

deep hull
#

and the diagram just isnt accurate

tacit siren
#

Actually nvm can't think of a way of doing this without assuming it's a line devastation

deep hull
#

well you can only use angle theorems anyway

tacit siren
#

which ones are they exactly?

deep hull
#

sorry for phone shadow

#

those are all the ones they provide

tacit siren
#

Oh we'd be using supplementary angles if we used the line thing

deep hull
#

supplementary is just 2 tho, right?

tacit siren
#

Description says "2 or more"

deep hull
#

ah i see

tacit siren
#

Anyways if we can assume SA then you can use SATT to get the third angles of the isosceles triangles in terms of x and y

#

And those angles all belong to a bigger triangle that has the 58 degree angle

#

So u can solve for (x + y) in terms of a nunber using SATT again

#

And from x + y +d = 180 u get d

deep hull
#

wdym by "in terms of x and y"

#

what would be the equation for the angles in that case

tacit siren
#

Like for instance saying <ABC = x + 90 (ABC are just random letters of a triangle)

#

And for the other angle saying it equals y + 90

#

Those aren't the right equations btw

#

Just examples

deep hull
#

uhh ok

tacit siren
#

I think we have to assume they drew an unambiguous line 🙃

deep hull
#

thats fair i guess

tacit siren
#

I mean in the illustrations they drew for the theorems they don't always tell you that they're lines either

deep hull
#

ok so im still a little confused on the equations

#

x + y + d = 180

#

but how do we turn that into angles in terms of x and y

tacit siren
#

Well the idea is you can solve for (x +y) in some other way

deep hull
#

how would that be

tacit siren
#

And to start that off you calculate what the third angles are on the isosceles angles as an expression of x for one of them, and as an expression of y for another

#

Cus eventually

#

We want to use the labeled angle

deep hull
#

so its like, 180 - 2x?

tacit siren
#

And those angles belong to a larger triangle containing the 58

#

Yeeee

deep hull
#

ok so (180 - 2y) + (180 - 2x) + 58 = 180

tacit siren
#

Yup

deep hull
#

i just have a feeling this may be the wrong route

tacit siren
#

whys that

deep hull
#

other questions right before dont require any algebra or labeling or anything like that

#

you start from an angle and work your way around

#

the whole point is that you're just using angle theorems and nothing else

tacit siren
#

hmm

#

I mean we are using just the theorems hmmCat

#

I guess here first we do isosceles twice

#

Then SATT three times and then SA one time so that might be too much unless they're not counting by number of timea

deep hull
#

ur meant to use 5

#

not 5 different

#

just 5 total

tacit siren
#

rip

deep hull
#

yeah i think you need a different approach

white flicker
#

You got this solved?

deep hull
#

no not yet

white flicker
#

Ok

#

Let me help you

deep hull
#

alright sure

white flicker
#

Where is the question

deep hull
#

in pins

deep hull
white flicker
#

This is very ez though

deep hull
#

well uhh

#

idk what to say to that

#

its hard for me

#

ive spent a lot of time trying to figure it out

white flicker
#

But i see you just figured it out

tacit siren
deep hull
tacit siren
#

But we used 6

white flicker
#

wait

#

you filled out the blank

#

which it means your issue is solved

deep hull
#

what blank

white flicker
#

Right?

tacit siren
#

Those are different problema

white flicker
tacit siren
#

They were example problems

white flicker
#

Hmmm

deep hull
#

yeah those are different problems

tacit siren
#

Scroll all the way up

white flicker
#

Oh

#

I didn't see that

deep hull
#

i was trying to show that the methodology didnt seem right

#

cuz other questions used a different method

white flicker
tacit siren
#

Problem is figuring it out in 5 or less theorems rn devastation

#

My method used 6

white flicker
#

This one?

deep hull
#

yes

tacit siren
#

And again repeats count

white flicker
#

Lol

tacit siren
white flicker
#

This is very easy brother

#

I mean bro

deep hull
#

what do i say to that

white flicker
#

Let me fill those answer for you

deep hull
#

i find it hard

tacit siren
#

No the answer isn't the problem

white flicker
#

This is like middle school geometry

tacit siren
#

See that paper of theorems?

#

We need to use it 5 timea

white flicker
#

Ye

deep hull
white flicker
#

I don't need it though

tacit siren
#

No like

deep hull
white flicker
#

I still remember all the theory of triangles

deep hull
#

its required

#

oh i see

tacit siren
#

No omg just go away

white flicker
#

I did questions probably hundreads of times like this

#

Lol

deep hull
#

ok we get it how do you do it

tacit siren
#

The problem is that he needs to use it 5 times for his homework and he's restricted to those

#

Not that we dont know them

deep hull
#

yeah

tacit siren
#

Hell we already figured out the solution too but it took 6 stepa

#

That's the only problem we need a solution of 5 or less steps :p

white flicker
#

ok

#

i get it

#

you will only and have to do 5 steps to get the angle of D

deep hull
#

yes

white flicker
#

Lemme do it

#

Hold my beer

deep hull
#

uh ok sure

white flicker
#

wait

#

where is the term though

deep hull
#

wdym

white flicker
#

is that all you got?

deep hull
#

yes

white flicker
#

bruh

deep hull
#

you arent given anything more

white flicker
#

😰

tacit siren
#

no parallel lines labeled but maybe we can prove them

white flicker
#

ez

#

hold my beer

deep hull
tacit siren
#

Actually nvm not sure if we're allowed to assume the converse of those angle theorems for the parallel lines

deep hull
#

yeah

tacit siren
#

yeah the theorems only say "if parallel then (thing" not if thing then parallel

deep hull
#

almost all of the solutions so far have involved drawing/continuing an extra line then using that to solve

#

so thats why i drew a bunch of lines

#

they havent helped tho lol

white flicker
#

Tbh

deep hull
#

yeah

white flicker
#

You sure there is no any term for this question?

#

No way you can do this quesiton without any other angles

tacit siren
#

U can but in 6 steps :p

white flicker
#

yea

#

i mean by that

deep hull
#

i mean this is part of a 41 question package

#

so its not a big deal if i dont do it

tacit siren
#

when the side boss tougher than the final boss

deep hull
#

but its one of the last questions i need to do

deep hull
#

so it probably is the final boss

tacit siren
#

Oh kek

white flicker
#

can you show me how do you get the 6 steps

tacit siren
#

First use ITT twice

white flicker
#

I'm wondering no angles no parallel

tacit siren
#

Then on the isosceles triangles use SATT twice

#

Then use SATT à third time on the bigger triangle containing the 58 degree angle and the third angle of the 2 other triangles

deep hull
#

oh new person typing

#

this could be big yall

tacit siren
#

And finally supplementary angles and solve for d

#

So like you basically make two equations and you can consider x+y as a single variable