#help-28
1 messages ยท Page 86 of 1
well ye the + c.
It kind of looks like you're doing Integrating Factor, and if you're doing that, by exponent rules, the +c shouldn't matter because you're going to multiply your whole equation by your factor, but then you can juste divide everything by c thus rendering that constant useless. If you're not doing that however, yes, keep the +c
.close
Closed by @elder cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not sure where to begin with this problem
can you not just sub in values and compare your results?
this was my thought process because it says to use differentials
but I don't know what this tells me ๐
or if I need to differentiate in a different way
this is what subbing in the values to the given function gives me
then made into a difference
It's what it says ๐คทโโ๏ธ "Consider L as a function of the variables I and r. Use differentials to find dL at the point given"
The entire image posted is only one question
Oh i thought that is the next question
@inland fjord Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
This is multivariable calculus, right?
For sure you need partial derivatives here
Let's start with single-variable first, so that you see the picture
Suppose you have y=f(x) and a point (x0, y0)
We increase x0 by dx
What will be the new y?
You must have studied this
y0 + dy?
the derivative with respect to y?
it's f(x0).dx
It's a well known formula
$y_{1} = y_{0} + dy = y_{0} + f'(x_{0}) \cdot dx$
LUNA
ok yes
it's called tangent line of a function at a given point
it's the formula for the tangent line if you recall
which allows you to compute y's close to y0
for x's close to x0
Ok
Did you actually understand it?
Or you're just oking me
๐
(x0,y0)
(x0+dx, y0+dy)
and dy = f'(x0).dx
as simple as that
So, the new y becomes
y0 + f'(x0).dx
Yes I understand
Allright, time to generalize to 2 variables
Yes, and the function f(x) of course
gotcha
yes makes sense

Now, we generalize to 2 variables
We had one variable only x
f (or y) was varying to x only
What if we had 2 variables!
Consider z=f(x,y) and the point (x0,y0,z0)
z0 = f(x0,y0) okay?
ok ๐
Now since we have 2 variables, we add to x0 an amount dx
and to y0 an amount dy
at the same time
(x0,y0,z0)
The new point automatically will be
(x0+dx,y0+dy,z0+dz)
Right!
ok ok
The thing is, what is dz?
When x0 changed by dx, and y0 changed by dy
How much does z0 change?
When we had one variable x
dy was equal to f'(x0).dx
Following the same logic, dz = f'(x0).dx + f'(y0).dy
it's just another variable added
it adds to the change in z
gotcha
So that's basically it
But since f is a function of two variables
It has 2 derivatives, not just one
One with respect to the first variable only
And one with respect to the second variable only
We call them partial derivatives
f'(x0) is the derivative of f with respect to x, evaluated at x0
f'(y0) is the derivative of f with respect to y, evaluated at y0
in single variable, y1 = y0 + dy. in two variables, z1 = z0 + dz? and dz = f'(x0)dx + f'(y0)dy
is that correct
yes exactly
I will write down the general formula
The z1 is simply called z
and z=f
Okay
I will write it
ok
$z=z_{0} + \frac{ \partial z}{ \partial x} \cdot dx + \frac{ \partial z}{ \partial y} \cdot dy$
LUNA
This is it
Compact form
Somehow
When you partially differentiate the function with respect to x, you consider x only to be variable
You treat y as a constant
And when you partially differentiate the function with respect to y, you consider y only to be variable
You treat x as a constant
this might be dumb but that formula looks like it assumes z0 is given. so given a point (x0, y0) how do u solve for z0?
z0 = f(x0,y0)
You are given the function
of course
How else would you find z's from x's and y's
and how else would you be able to differentiate if you were not given f?
๐
true true
one small example before doing the exercise you sent?
i'll make it very simple
z = xy and you have a point (x0,y0,z0)=(1,1,1)
I increase x by 0.5
I increase y by 0.5
What will be the new z?
Let's say z1
Show me!
thx
Now do the same for your exercise
L = i/rยฒ
i0 = 100, r0 = 90
di = 1, dr=2
Notice, here they do not want the new intensity
They want just the change in it
not z1, just the dz
Wait, but I told you
They only want dL
Not the new L
$z=z_{0} + \frac{ \partial z}{ \partial x} \cdot dx + \frac{ \partial z}{ \partial y} \cdot dy$
LUNA
The dz is just this part here
wouldn't dz = z1? because z1 = f'(x0)dx + f'(y0)dy
$dz= \frac{ \partial z}{ \partial x} \cdot dx + \frac{ \partial z}{ \partial y} \cdot dy$
LUNA
u right
other than that, you did good!
it's just that you do not need to find L1
Then do L1-L0 for dL
i see
They're just asking for dL
i didnt need to find L0 to find dL
Right, but it's okay
unless I wanted to find L1
Yes
You did great!
Modify it a little bit and show me again

Always at first write your main equation that you will be working on
$dL= \frac{ \partial L}{ \partial i} \cdot di + \frac{ \partial L}{ \partial r} \cdot dr$
LUNA
To know exactly what the question requires
And avoid wasting time on unnecessary stuff
You're welcome!
.close
Closed by @inland fjord
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Now you owe me a CFA sandwich
i got u
๐
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im not sure what I need to do here
The usual idea. You want to show that the limit definition of the derivative exists
Actually now that I think about it, there's multiple ideas of what "differentiable" is here. What does your book say?
@chrome idol Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Sorry, had to leave for a bit
The prof actually told what to do at the end of lecture. Its more like I didnt understand it
He said, to check f_x(0,0) and f_y(0,0) using the limit definition
Then take partial f wrt x and y at (x,y) != (0,0) (this I wasnt sure if I copied wodn correctly).
Lastly take limit of partial x and y as (x,y) goes to (0,0)
he wants you to use the theorem that if the partial derivatives exist and are continuous, then the function is differentiable
which seems like a bit overkill if you just want to show that it's differentiable at zero (also that method may fail even if the function is differentiable, because that theorem only gives a sufficient condition, not a necessary condition)
Ok, I'll first use his method. Then see if there is another way.
So to check f_x(0,0) using limit definition, I just do f(h,0) - f(0,0) = 0
Here I'm already stuck? Since f(h,0) = 0
yep, so f_x(0,0) is zero
well the limit as h->0 of zero is zero
yes, both partials at (0,0) exist and are zero
that shows that if f is differentiable at (0,0), its derivative will also be zero
but unfortunately, existence of the partials isn't enough to imply differentiability
right. I think I remember that from lecture.
simple counterexample, you can make f(x,y) = 0 on the x and y axes, and anything you like everywhere else
then the partials will be zero at (0,0) but there's no reason the function should even be continuous at (0,0) let alone differentiable
$\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{2xy^4}{(x^2+y^2)^2}$ and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = \frac{2x^4y}{(x^2+y^2)^2}$
KN
make sense..
Then what does this show?
to show differentiability at (0,0), you already found that if the derivative exists, it needs to be equal to zero, so the most straightforward way to do this is via the definition: if you make the magnitude of (h,k) small, does that make the difference quotient small
where magnitude of (h,k) is sqrt(h^2 + k^2)
and the difference quotient is $\frac{f(h,k) - f(0,0)}{\sqrt{h^2 + k^2}}$
Bungo
So a easier way, you are suggesting, is just computing this limit as h and k goes to 0?
yes
the way your prof suggested should work in this case as well, but imo it's more complicated since it involves two limits
and as i said, that's only a sufficient condition, not necessary, so if it fails you can't conclude anything
Hmm. Ok I will do both ways.
But what is the point of computing this?
well you would do that with the goal that showing the each of those goes to zero as you let (x,y) go to zero
that will show that they are both continuous at (0,0)
and continuity (as opposed to merely existence) of partial derivatives at (0,0) implies that the function is differentiable at (0,0)
and this is a theorem?
right, that's a theorem
the converse is false
a function can be differentiable at (0,0) even if its partials are not continuous there
that's another reason why you should generally approach a question like this via the definition
(most likely at some point they will give you a problem where the partials are not continuous but the function is still differentiable)
(there are standard examples of this that professors love to ask haha)
i see
Ok in the final step with my profs approach, letting x,y go to 0,0 will make both of these 0/0
yea, indeterminate forms, so you'll have to try simplifying first, or maybe sandwich them below something larger that also goes to zero
@chrome idol Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @chrome idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
- whats the difference between a maximum and supremum?
- why is the integral less or equal to the supremum?
supremums exist
maximums might not
sure the circumference of the circle gets bigger but why does that matter
we are bounding the integrand by some number
eg 2
and then evaluate $\int_0^{2\pi } 2 dt$
denascite
hm idk isnt it lenght * sup
the length appears after you plug in the parametrization
so thats already taken care of
a circle right
yes
and that is already taken care of
from plugging in the parametrization
we are just integrating from 0 to 2pi here
Jordan's lemma ? ๐ค
hmmm
okay kinda makes sense now but if he wouldnt have parameterised it then it would depend on r right
yes
Closed by @slender terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i know that the response is b but im unsure if i got the description h(t) & g(t) correct: I have their equation as h(t) = x^2 and g(t) = e^3t/20? please let me know if this is ok
@gilded prairie Has your question been resolved?
hmm, if it's tripling every twenty years the base should be 3, shouldn't it?
i know it's tempting to see exponential and put e but it's not always that ;)
got it
do you mean like this: 3e^x/20?
no, let's take a look at this
if my money doubled every day, starting with 1 on day 0, what is the equation I could use to describe how much money I had?
0 -> 1
1 -> 2
2 -> 4
3 -> 8
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
โ
would it be x^2 if doubled?
3^something yeah, since it's tripling every 20 days it needs to be stretched horizontally by a factor of 20
3^(20x) would shrink it horizontally
20*3^x to make it stretch?
uhhh no i mean 3^(x/20)
ohh ok got it
thank you
also one more question: i got horizontal asym for 1,2,& 4 would that be right?
,w graph sqrt(x) from -1 to 30
Closed by @gilded prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
uhhhhh no
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone help me with b and c
im not sure how to get those answers, i just put the answers the website told me
so im just wondering how do i actauly solve it
i know how to get A, B, and C, but not sure on the others
rie.mann
you know one side length and one angle, so solve for the other variables using the trig functions
so to find like hyp
it would be sin74.6= 4.4/hyp right?
but how do i solve from there thats my question
remember to be in degree mode on your calculator
what is your whole question exactly
do you know how to solve for hyp from here
how do i solve hyp from this
no that is my question basically
if i gave you an equation like $4 = \frac8x$ could you solve it for x?
Hayley
it's the same idea here
GUYS help me with this:
okay you need to review algebra then and do a lot of practice problems
Closed by @dire agate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
โ
(this is nythzn's channel)
you have a=b/c
then multiply by c on both sides to get ac = b
then divide by c to solve for a
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
did you use sin(74.6)?
GUYS ACTUALLY CAN ANYONE HELP ME WITH THIS:
<@&268886789983436800> spammer
dUDE I JUST WANT HELP
no im sorry im so confused
do you know where you got this equation?
yes cuz sin is equal to opp/hyp then u plug the angle into sin along w the sides u have
but im just mad consfused on how to solve from there
so you don't use 74.6, but you use sin(74.6)
correct
ok write on your paper $\sin(74.6^\circ) = \frac{4.4}{\text{hyp}}$
Hayley
then calculate sin(74.6) and rewrite that equation with the value you get
sine is a function. so sin(some angle) is just a number
.9640=4.4/hyp is what i got
tell mods, not me
Closed by @hazy igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
,calc sin(74.6 deg)
Result:
0.96409540423411
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
calculate the value of the generalized triple integral
@radiant hemlock off topic but what paper is that, nice handwriting btw
Haha thanks!
anyway, according to the solution suggestion given to me, the expression should be simplified to R^2rsin(theta). I get it to R^2*r so I must be close..
The paper is called "Whitelines"
nvm, I see my problem now
.close
Closed by @radiant hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So im confused on the Amplitude ... the amplitude would be legnth of reaching the max or min value? so wouldnt it be 300?
@gilded prairie Has your question been resolved?
@gilded prairie Has your question been resolved?
Yes. Do you have something that says otherwise?
i checked answer key and its saying that A is -300
and C 4300
In your case, A is not the amplitude
Amplitude = 300 is correct
Try calculating P(0) to see why
i got 4000 since the given says a min value
@gilded prairie Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @gilded prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there any way to solve this without lhospital rule?
try factoring
.close
Closed by @gaunt flume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help with this task? Calculate the integral
xdV over the set E where E is the set of points between the cylinders x^2 + y^2 = 1
and x^2 + y^2 = 4, which are also between the surfaces z = 0 and z = y + 2.
How do I calculate the integral? I am not sure what the integral limits are here.
@gentle heart Has your question been resolved?
Is this correct? because the answer would be zero then
nvm I just read the link you sent
.close
Closed by @gentle heart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Kind of confused over what the author means by using the axiom of replacement twice
Isnโt it just a single application, we replace (a,b) in the set N x N with aโb?
you also do (a,b) ~ (c,d) iff a + d = c + b
oh i see
yeah im not sure where two applications is coming from if you're starting from N x N and applying a single equivalence relation
Closed by @merry swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I got stuck doing this limit, I've tried doing it differently, but dont know what I'm doing wrong
@untold swallow Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
this is right
on the next line you gained a power of t ?
and somehow gained a power of -1 in the exponent
and lost the cosine term
But that t isn't the t that is at the start with the 2t?
Or when. I move the 2 to the left of the Lim do I have to move also the t?
where did the t in the denominator go then
this is what happens when you try to do too many steps at once
no
Oh ok
So, it's ok up to here, the rest is wrong, right?
yes
And how could I continue? Cuz if I replace the 0 as it is, it's still undefined
@untold swallow Has your question been resolved?
@untold swallow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this one
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
do you know what a relation is
reflexive antisymmetric symmetric
do you know what a relation is
yes
do you know how to show a relation is reflexive?
when every element is related to itself
a relation is reflexive if xRx for any x
so take a pair of subsets of X
(A,B)
and compute $A\Delta B$
maximofs
your task is to show (A,B)R(A,B)
that is, $A\Delta B\subseteq A\Delta B$
maximofs
hopefully it should be clear that itโs true
yes
can you prove to me that itโs true? it should be like a single sentence
i mean every set is a subset of itself
yes
for all a and b in A if aRb then bRa
good
now do you think this relation is symmetric?
also, do you know what $A\Delta B$ means
maximofs
symmetric difference of sets, union of A - B, B-A
yup
so back to deciding whether R is symmetric
the fact that weโre doing a subset relation should tell you something about whether this is probably symmetric or not
so do you think itโs a symmetric relation?
is the relation < on R (the reals) symmetric?
if a < b, is it true that b < a?
the point i want to get across is that if A is a subset of B, B is not necessarily a subset of A
so maybe our first guess should be they this is not symmetric
oh i see
no
so then letโs try to build a counterexample
a good thing to note is that the symmetric difference with the empty set gives doesnโt change anything
so in particular, the symmetric difference of X and the empty set is X
does that make sense?
{1} subset of {1,2} but {1,2} not a subset of {1}, like this?
yes basically
what iโm getting at is
every element of P(X) is a subset of X
and incidentally
every element of $\mathcal P(X)$ is a subset of $X\Delta \emptyset$
maximofs
that is
everything relates to (X, empty set)
so the symmetric difference between a set and an empty set returns the original set
all we need to do now is find a symmetric difference that gives us something smaller than X
in language a little more relevant to your problem, we now have
$\forall\ (A,B) \in P(X)\times P(X), (A,B)R(X,\emptyset)$
maximofs
now we just need to find a pair A,B so that
(X,empty set) doesnโt relate to (A,B)
which amounts to finding A and B so
$X \cancel\subseteq A\Delta B$
maximofs
is this clear so far
yes
ok
since X is the biggest possible set here
we just want a symmetric difference that doesnโt give us X
can you give me sets (A,B) so that their symmetric difference is not X
feel free to play around with a few examples
let X = {1, 2, 3, 4}, A = {1, 2} and B = {3, 4}. AฮB = (a-b)u(b-a) = {1,2} u {3,4} = {1,2,3,4}
let X = {1,2,3,4}, A = {1,2} and B = {2,3}, a-b = {1}, b - a = {3}, {1} u {3} = {1,3}
X is given to you already
i was taking that to be X
you have the right idea i think
letโs walk through an easy example though
so as i explained above the symmetric difference of X and {} is X
and since X is the largest set there is here
everything is a subset of X
specifically every symmetric difference of A and B is a subset of X
so (A,B)R(X,empty set)
but now
what if we took A = B = {}?
what is the symmetric difference of two empty sets?
yes
so (A,B)R(X,{})
since the empty set is a subset of X
but what if we flip this
is X a subset of the empty set?
no
then this is an example of when R is not symmetric
did all of that make sense to you
yes makes sense
ok so we found a counterexample to symmetry, so R is not symmetric
do you want to try the anti symmetric and transitive ones yourself
yes but what about the second one
so for that we can use the fact that every subset can be written as a symmetric difference
hm
let me think about it a little more
ok i have an idea for number 2, iโm not sure if itโs what theyโre going for
the symmetric difference of A and B gives us {1,2,7,8}
in order to get a symmetric difference that includes these elements, we need to move 1,2,7,8 into 2 different sets
that is, how many different ways can we put 4 elements into 2 sets
for each element we can pick one of the two sets
so we have 2^4 ways to move these around
then for the rest of the elements we can pick whether theyโre in one of the sets, both of the sets, or neither
this amounts to multiplying by 2^4 for each other element in X
does this make sense to you
where did 4^6 come from
there are 6 remaining numbers which could be in C in D or in both or none, 4 possibili
oh yes sorry
it should be 6^4
or bio
no
each has 4 possibilities
so we have 4^6
so total it should be 2^4 * 4^6 = 2^16
holy wack this is hard
you know any good books where I can learn more about this topic?
this is a pretty generic topic
any intro to proofs book will go over the first question
the second is like baby combinatorics
@west mango Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @west mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have no idea what is happening here whatsoever
is that your typing?
no
can you show the original source from your book
show it
its from word document, i enabled edition so that is probably why it looks like that
okay the whole thing is like this
i already did the first one
screenshot the original document
this is the original document sorry....
is not from a book
but from custom word homework document assigned to us
porque estรกs escribiendo f(x) con la (x) debajo de la f
usualmente se escribe todo en la misma lรญnea
it already looked like this
not my doing...
by the way i haven't touched anything there
we usually do it with paper and pencil and take photos of our notebooks
.close
Closed by @royal mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is my important test paper, but I donโt have the answer๐ญ I try to solve it. Is my answer right?
Please check my solution
@frosty warren Has your question been resolved?
Help
@frosty warren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@hybrid cloak Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Find the distance halfway first
Use distance= speed*time
I mean tbh it's a lot easier than that, by process of elimination
2.5 miles
1/6 times 15
and idk about the second one bc im only given speed
fxck this.
.close
Closed by @hybrid cloak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
|(x-3)/(x^2-4)| โค 1
how to solve this inequality
|u| โค 1 becomes 2 inequalities
-1 โค u โค 1
So apply that to get rid of the absolute value bars
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stark igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
โ
okay thanks
.close
Closed by @stark igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Bezoutโs identity
Why canโt I just say that since gcd(a,b)|a,b by definition, then it must divide a(x)+b(y)
What proof are you looking at
In mathematics, Bรฉzout's identity (also called Bรฉzout's lemma), named after รtienne Bรฉzout, is the following theorem:
Here the greatest common divisor of 0 and 0 is taken to be 0. The integers x and y are called Bรฉzout coefficients for (a, b); they are not unique. A pair of Bรฉzout coefficients can be computed by the extended Euclidean algorithm...
Fuck
@gentle stump Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does this seem right
,calc 7/4 * cos(150 *pi/180)
Result:
-1.5155444566228
,calc 7/4 * sin(150 * pi/180)
Result:
0.875
seems ritht to me
Yes.
i just dont know how to format it
do you think they want like an exact answer
i had another one where the answer was exact answer so i just wanna figure that out
i got the answer
help help help help
plase please please
What is ||v||?
Do you recall what I told you previously about calculating the unit vector?
sqrt v1^2+v2^2
Which is?
sqrt(144), so 12
So now divide vector v by ||v||
so like 12/12?
<12/12,0/12>
would htat be U
Check is ||u||=1
yes it is right
Ok, remember, to find the unit vector, you do (vector v)/(||v||)
$\hat{\bold{v}} = \frac{\bold{v}}{||\bold{v}||}$
kookiemon
The carot is notation to indicate the normalized vector, or unit vector, of a vector.
You will also see |v| or ||v|| notation to indicate magnitude.
yes i understand that part
i know what the plug in for ||v|| but not for v itself
| | v | |
fuck i figured it out okay i think hold up
?
fuck that was it jesus
would i do the same steps for this one?
Calculate the unit vector of u then multiply by the magnitude ||v||.
would this be the answer <2/8,2/8>?
What is the magnitude of u?
<2/sqrt(8) , 2 /sqrt(8)> is the unit vector of u.
You divide the components of u by the magnitude of u.
,calc 8 * 2/sqrt(8)
Result:
5.6568542494924
,wolf 8* 2/sqrt(8)
so thats V?
That's how you will find the components of v.
so the answer ouwld be <4sqrt2,4sqrt2> right?
im sorru im just not understanding very well this is my first day leraning vectors shits ocnfusnog
$\hat{\bold{u}} = \frac{\bold{u}}{|\bold{u}|}$
kookiemon
As long as you know how to calculate the magnitude of a vector, you can find its unit vector using that formula.
A unit vector is just a vector inside of a unit circle.
ohhhhhh taht makes a lot more since
first i need to find magn of U so it would be
sqrt 8
shouldnt it be <2/sqrt8, 2/sqrt8>?
Yes.
The image I posted is just some generic vector I made. Nothing to do with your question.
This is the vector u = <2,2>.
And its unit vector.
That is the unit vector of u. To find the vector v, you multiply the unit vector of u by the magnitude of v.
$\bold{v} = ||\bold{v}|| \cdot \frac{\bold{u}}{||\bold{u}||}$
kookiemon
ohhhh so then its 8*2/sqrt8
Correct.
<4\sqrt{2},4\sqrt{2}>
Correct.
would tha tbe the answer?
Yes.
To understand what's actually going on, realize that ||v||/||u|| is just a ratio.
You are just multiplying a vector by a ratio to get a resized vector.
ohhh yeah that makes a lot more sense
this class im taking is like 4 montjs of info in like the span of 5 weeks
Calculus or just vectors?
its a trig class
Never take a STEM class in the summer. There is just way too much to learn.
yeah i lowkey regret it
im a sohpmore going into junior year and last year i took alg 2
and for junior year im trying to take calc ab and skip precalc trhough my school
so i took this class to try and prepare for it
Trig and Precalc usually cover most of the same topics.
No.
How did you calculate the magnitude?
Result:
39
oh its just 39
Yes.
i was close silly error
That's how it usually goes.
okay one more then i think i might be good if you wouldnt mind helping?
do i kinda do what i did before witht his one?
Find the unit vector of v and then verify the magnitude of that unit vector is equal to 1.
So divide the components of v by the magnitude of v.
so the vector the sqrt17
the unit vector of v would be <1/sqrt17, -4/17>
then i would divide for example 1sqrt17 by sqrt17 again??
The magnitude of v is sqrt(17). You have the correct unit vector.
Calculate the magnitude of the unit vector that you found in the same manner as before to verify that it is equal to 1?
so like 1/sqrt16^2+4sqrt17^2?
yeah thats what i thought so
this is the right answer
nbm
that is notright
.close
Closed by @hazy igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This question may not come in the format of a standard math question, i hope that is okay
Anyways, ive got a little bit of a road block in programming here
I am trying to make this character follow the camera's pitch rotation. Here you can see i was successful in the spine and neck:
But the arms are not so simple
The neck starts out completely aligned with the direction it needs to turn. (Orientation in x, y, z format starts out at 0, 0, 0. All i need to do here is modify the x component by ฮธ degrees and it tilts forward perfectly). But the arms start out with a specific rotation, which in turn also throws the axis off of an easy rotation.
Here's an example of what i mean:
The arm bone here points downward at many different angles. Its precice orientation at this point is (-25.567, 34.957, -149.071).
The green, blue and red lines represent the three axis i can rotate them on. But I want to rotate the arm about the yellow line. Does anyone know how this can be accomplished?
I know this will need to be done via a combination of all three vectors. I just need to find out the proportions of each.
In the gif above, you can see how the spine and neck bend perfectly, but the arms (only being rotated about the red axis) bend the wrong way, due to only one of the axis being affected
Programming is tough because everything is done in reverse from what you've learned in math class. In math class, you are given and an equation and are trying to find the variables. In programming, you are given the variables and are trying to find the equation
Wait so let me see if I understand the question
Is it just that you're trying to rotate along an axis that doesn't align nicely with the axes you can easily rotate on
yes
Instead of just increasing the X axis by 5 degrees or whatnot, I have to rotate all 3 axis by a unknown amount in order to rotate along the yellow line
Would a change of basis matrix not work here?
Basis matrix?
Do you know any linear algebra
I do not believe i have taken the class
It's a (change of basis) matrix not a (change of) basis matrix
Though change of basis matrix might still be a weird thing to say
As far as mathematics, the most relevant classes I have taken are Calculus and trigonometry
though I cannot say either class has prepared me for this problem
Yeah this feels like a problem that's easy if you've done linear algebra but tricky otherwise
Let's see if I can explain what to do
Ok so is this problem equivalent to the following
You just want to rotate along a line that's not a coordinate axis right?
yes
Ok then you don't even need to change basis or anything
There's just a standard formula for this I can look up
Change of basis is just a tool you could use to derive the formula, but isn't necessary to apply it
This should have the answer
Should be this
So to apply this you first write the axis you're rotating around as a unit vector (u_x, u_y, u_z)
Is that unit vector in degrees or coordinates?
Coordinates basically
Pick a point on the line you're rotating around
The unit vector would be (-1, 0, 0)
You need to write it in terms of the basic axes you can rotate around
If I'm understanding correctly, the basis axes here are the green, blue, and red ones, and yellow is what you want to rotate around
So take a unit vector along the red, green, and blue lines
Actually that's probably what you want to start with since those won't be the standard unit vectors
The unit vector of the red, green and blue axes is (-0.5168537497520447, -0.431569367647171, -0.7393308877944946)
That's a unit vector for one of them?
yes, most likely the red one
Ok so take a unit vector on each one, and also on one the yellow line
The yellow one will be (-1, 0, 0)
The one on the yellow line should just be (1,0,0). Or (-1,0,0) works too
Okay so
Doesn't really matter which you use.
It'll just change the direction you'll end up rotating in, not the axis
Now what you want to do is write the yellow one in terms of the other ones
Honestly I'm not sure if there's a good way to do this without learning linear algebra
Yellow: (-1, 0, 0)
Red: (-0.5168537497520447, -0.431569367647171, -0.7393308877944946)
Green: (-0.5759537816047668, -0.46364542841911316, 0.6732831597328186)
Blue: (0.6333557367324829, -0.7738093137741089, 0.008927153423428535)
Okay
I could maybe walk you through the formula, but you'd want to get an intuition for why it works
If you ever wanted to debug, rewrite your code, or solve a similar problem
I think i remember possibly doing something like this at some point, im not sure
It actually isn't that tricky is the good news
And it'll serve you very well to learn as a programmer
Linear algebra is essential in computer graphics
The outline is this
You've just represented the red green and blue unit vectors in terms of the standard ones
It turns out you can encode that representation in what's called a matrix
Then if you take the inverse of that matrix (which is something any good math library for any programming language will have a standard function to do) it'll give you a representation of the standard unit vectors in terms of the yellow red and blue ones
This is called a change of basis
hold on a sec
This will let you represent the yellow unit vector in terms of the red green and blue ones
It looks like we're building something kinda like this
I never really understood what the nine rotational arguments meant or how they worked
Then you can apply the formula for rotating around an axis
That makes sense now
And then you use your original change of basis matrix to convert back to the standard coordinates and boom you have your rotation formula
Look up 3blue1brown's essence of linear algebra series on youtube
It's under 2 hours long and will give you a great overview of the core concepts of linear algebra
Then study it a bit in whatever way feels best (textbook, youtube lectures, etc) and go back to this problem
It'll take a bit of time, but will save you far more time in the long run
As an added bonus, linear algebra is used in a lot of other cool stuff too
And is just a beautiful subject in it's own right
Also in the future I think the kind of question you asked is better suited for a programming server.
Thats true, but a lot of them were stumped as they did not know linear algebra.
For here I'd maybe more just ask "what kind of math is needed to solve X problem" instead of asking for a solution
And I'd ask that sort of thing in the discussion channels not the help channels
Yeah thats what i was kinda going for, trying to see if anyone knew how to build the equation
But I mean, what you did here worked so eh
.close
Closed by @wintry shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You do not need to keep closing and opening channels, stay in one channel and wait patiently
bro i been here since like 10
Okay, and?
You still don't need to close and open channels to get attention
I already told you it's wrong
<@&286206848099549185>
@burnt birch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is a graphical representation of a problem I found in an old textbook. In this drawing each of the two circles with centers B and C has a radius of 3 cm , AB โ CB and |CA| = 10 cm . Find out the angle BAC.
sin BAC = (BC/CA)
BC = the sum of radius of two circles
BC = 6cm
not one i can think of
ok, so from what you said I can deduce, that sin BAC = 3/5
using inverse trig functions
arcsin(sin(BAC)) = arcsin(0.6)
BAC = arcsin(0.6)
u need a calc to find arcsin(0.6)
my calculator doesn't have arcsins : (
use your phone :D
use shift button
great
.close
Closed by @proud spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
#help-18 message
What are some sufficient conditions (weaker than being twice differentiable) for an everywhere differentiable function f : R -> R to have a continuous derivative?
@spice orchid Has your question been resolved?
@spice orchid Has your question been resolved?
hmm
@spice orchid Has your question been resolved?
i wonder if ive seen this before
x^2 * sin(1/x) but I don't know how to generalize it
i remember this bad boy:
idk if it helps
[
g_n(x) = \begin{cases}
x^n \sin(1/x) , \text{if $x \neq 0$} \
0 , \text{otherwise}
\end{cases}
]
@spice orchid Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @ocean birch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.