#help-28
1 messages · Page 58 of 1
that means you can write: (1/3)^x?
VulcanOne
So that means 3^x * 1/3?
$3^{x+1} \cdot \frac 13 = 3^{x+1 -1} = 3^{x}$
VulcanOne
Why -1?
$3^{x+1} \cdot \frac 13 = 3^{x+1} \cdot 3^{-1}= 3^{x+1 -1} = 3^{x}$
VulcanOne
@fathom cairn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How are they getting that ratio
cc’/0.6 = 0.84/1.44
They mention similar triangles so im guessing its something like
This tells me that AA’ = 0.6. Not sure if thats right, but if it is, how did they get that
Triangle εcc' is similar to triangle εAA'
Alright i think that makes sense but where does 0.6 come from
So you have 1.8 as a total width
And above they mention that the middle width is 0.6
Oh
Oh i see
Ok last question is why do they know cc’ = dd’
One side of the triangles have size = 0.84. They are both right triangles. Is that enough to know cc’ = dd’
@flat lion Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hii umm
@echo summit Has your question been resolved?
Theyre talking about laying a needle down on water
Which then is in equilibrium due to surface tension gamma and gravity
The question they are asking is how do they get 2 L gamma cos theta = g
l is length of needle M is mass of needle gamma_w is surface tension of water, the other gamma is that of soapy water theta is the angle
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
it’s simply the general term, as it says
like the general term for a quadratic expression would be, ax^2+bx+c
that’s maths for you
do you understand how to do the question?
ill gonna give it a shot
i assume we do
$$
\binom{13}{k} x^{13 - k} \cdot y^k
$$
dannylewastaken
i’m ngl i was going to use pascal’s triangle
💀
pascal 13 high
lmaooooo
but i assume that is what it meant by general term, yes?
yeah
Ohh that makes sense
nned that summation
this is the general term

if you include a summation, then you get all the terms
yeah okay
oh ok
yeah that makes sense
general term
alr thank you
yeah
.close
Closed by @obsidian radish
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
isn't it B and C?
yes
D converges because of the alternate series rule
A obviously converges
B's term is equivalent to 1/3n so it diverges
C is equivalent to 1/3 + n² which diverges
@runic bloom Has your question been resolved?
okay ty
Closed by @runic bloom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to express logk(1/4) in terms of k
I dont even know where to begin other than rewriting the equation different ways that I can't see helping me
it's already written in terms of k
what does log_k(1/4) equal
what is your original problem
idk why they use log4()
if i were you i'd just go back to ln()
and log4() = 4*ln()
and use the basic ln properties
this is not true
yeah I was thinking that
4*ln() = ln(⁴), but there's nothing to power to 4 so it doesn't work
sorry i meant
yes but then I'm left with another unknown variable, b
but 1/4 = 4^(-1)
yes 1/4 = 4^(-1) but I don't see how that might help me progress further to solving it
no, it's not really in terms of anything at the moment. They want you to find k = ?
for example, 2^a = 8 in terms of a would be a = log2(8)
that's my understanding of it anyway at least based off the other parts of the entire question
the answer is -(1/k) but I have no idea how they get that
no
this is solving for a
if you're given k = ln(a), then ln(a^2) in terms of k is ln(a^2) = 2ln(a) = 2k
okay, that's my bad. The question is asking "If log4(a)=k, express logk(1/4) in terms of k"
yes and im saying they already expressed it in terms of k
the answer is -(1/k), idk what to tell you
I just need to figure out how they get that answer
maybe it means with k being the only variable?
cuz log is technically a variable, so it's probably just asking to express it without the log
,w log_4 10
where did that 10 come from
a wasn't specified
i'll just show it doesn't work for some a
,w -(1/1.660964)
,w log_1.660964 (1/4)
see how they're different?
but letting a equal anything will give a different answer every time?
well if you had $\log_4(a^2)$
maximo
yes
because u can sub in log4(a) for k
but in this final question
if you change the value of a
then you get a different value for log_k(1/4) and -1/k
so clearly the answer is incorrect
you're 110% certain the answer in the book is wrong?
there has to he some rule in logarithmic that allows the answer to be -(1/k)
but the fact this book gets all proof checked would make it very unlikely its wrong
it still happens, often
not saying it can't be, just very very unlikely
if you choose to believe the book that's ok, but you should also believe the numbers you just saw
computed not by me, but by wolfram alpha
which show the book is incorrect
it's up to you to decide what to do with that information
wait so you said k = log4(10), giving you that set of numbers as the result
obviously here you're just letting a = 10, but if it was let's say 8, the answers would be totally different
the point is
for part a
or part i
where you're asked to find log_4(a^2)
it's independent of a
a can be anything and the answer is correct
log_4(a^2) = 2k
yes
but in this last one
but part v is dependant?
yes. in fact it's incorrect for most values of a
in the change of base rule, what if I let the base equal a?
I'll send pic to show what I mean
i know what you mean
you can try but im done with this specific question, i think i've shown enough already
good luck 🫡
thank you
@simple totem I know u just said ur done, but I think solved it. Does that look right?
no
why not
i don't see how the last 2 equations hold
-loga(4) = -(1/k)?
how you got from -k^-1 / log_a(k) to that
bottom right
but then you're not talking about log_k(4^-1) anymore
you're talking about a completely different expression
if you cross multiply here you're not talking about -log_k(4) anymore
yes
maximo
which is not what we're trying to show
yes but look at the very bottom right then
those 2 multiplied give -loga(4)
which, if flipped / powered to -1 gives -(1/log4(a))
and log4(a) = k
so we can sub k in, giving us -(1/k)
maximo
what
no k^-1 = log_a(4)
k = 1/loga(4) = log_4(a)
you're back to the start
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/qpsrxqwaz0
here's a graph with k = log_4(x), and then log_k(1/4) and -1/k
you'll see the graphs don't match
for any x
yes, but did you see what the question wants you to write?
it's log_k(1/4)
not -1/log_4(a)
i feel like you're not reading what im sending
the answer in the book says -(1/k) which I know u say is wrong, but if its possible to get that as an answer, then it must be the answer
it is not an answer
you are not representing the original expression
i showed you 3 different times why they are not equivalent
you can get to -k^2/3! if you wanted to
but that doesn't mean it's the answer to the question
I didn't mean it's an answer to the equation, I mean it's an answer as in, a final judgement of what the question is asking
and i am saying it is not
again, read what i am sending
i said that -1/k is not a way to write the original expression
and i've shown you why that is the case
if you still believe those 2 forms are equivalent then i can't help you
okay wait, what exactly is the error in the pic where I showed me getting -(1/k)
you aren't expressing log_k(1/4)
you're now expressing a completely different thing from what the question asked you to
yes but at what point did I go off track
i've pointed this out multiple times if you scroll up
when you cross multiplied
i've said this before
there's no error there as far as I know
there isn't, but you're no longer talking about the same expression
im done here, it seems you're not reading what im sending
I am reading what you're saying, I just feel like we're talking about 2 different things. If there's no errors in my workings and I was only working with logk(1/4), then how could've I got the expression to something completely different
your equality doesn't go all the way through
you haven't expressed log_k(1/4) in terms of k
you wrote a completely different expression in terms of k
you're not doing what the question is asking you to do
you get to the point where you have this
you are no longer writing log_k(1/4) in terms of k
you are now talking about -log_a(k) * log_k(4)
the question wanted you to write:
log_k(1/4) in terms of k
you wrote:
-log_a(k) * log_k(4) in terms of k
-1/k is not an answer to what was asked of you
ah yes, I see now. I've just let a = 16, making k = 2 and if you fill that into the answer the book gave and the original expression, u get -2 = 1/2
this shows you they're not equal
these show you they're not equal
i don't know why you were so hesitant about believing hard empirical proof
the first proof you gave I just wasn't comprehending well enough
it is exactly what you did here
just couldn't wrap my head around it for some reason
yeah I'm honestly not sure what I was even thinking when I was looking at it. Idk is it because I'm just tired or what
anyways, at least I got to a conclusion... eventually... thank you
it's because you saw the answer and chose to believe the book could not make a mistake, then sought out that answer
there's tons and tons of typos all over the place in these books
no no I knew the book could make a mistake, just whatever I was thinking for some reason thought something else
it's almost 3am, I'm just not functioning at all ig
anyways, I'm going to close this, thank you again
.close
Closed by @undone mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I assess the validity of a factored polynomial?
by validity do you mean if it's the correct factorization?
@rose finch Has your question been resolved?
i got it already, thank you
Closed by @rose finch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone verify for me that i got an answer correct? ill send the picture in one second
"Find each integral. As part of your work explain which formula from the basic integral you
are using "
,w integral of 7 * (4th root of x)
yes
Closed by @dusty patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, return of a familiar problem:
I have the base cases down and I assume that it's true for all values up to k.
How do I go about using this?
I think I need to prove that $3 \cdot 2^n + (-1)^(n+1) \cdot 2$ is equal to something
but I'm not sure how I construct that something
Солдат удачи
wait it would be that term
added to the original an
I'm messing around on a blackboard on the other side of the room, please ping me for the noise if you contribute
Assuming a_n holds, show that a_(n+1) also holds. If you use the identity given for a_(k+1) then it follows directly from there
@hushed idol Has your question been resolved?
@hushed idol Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@ocean swallow Has your question been resolved?
That's not enough for convergence
Or what do you mean by "the limit"?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
which of these lines would be an acceptable answer? "find the derivative"
only the last one? or professors should not be too strict about it
let's say you don't spot the common factor, and hand it in before that
ask your teacher what they would accept
Closed by @dense edge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone check these? I just wanna make sure I'm understanding limits and one-sided limits correctly
Closed by @brisk parrot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
stop deleting, make a new channel, again
I'm not deleting though!
I swear I'm not
Every time I send the question it keeps disappearing and idk why
I tried sending it in the probability and statistics channel and it disappeared there too
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with #4
Draw the line y=x and visualize what happens to one of the triangles when it is reflected through the line.
Oh ok
you’ve answered 3 of the 4 questions
theres only one answer choice left
I just realized that lol
.close
Closed by @quasi terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this not just a)?
What makes you think a
sure, it's correct, I was just thinking maybe giving reasoning relating y-b=m(x-a) , which is of course what they've done above in the photo you've sent
.close
Closed by @bitter nymph
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m bad at rounding but if I were to round 2.5 to the nearest tenth would it stay the same or would it be 3 or 2.6?
It would stay the same
Why?
Yes it would stay the same because it's already a tenth
Closed by @brave mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to convert from minutes to seconds?
/60 or *60?
yes
Welcome
@eager locust Has your question been resolved?
can someone help me with maths?
sure
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was doing eigen values of matrices
and came across cubic polynomial
need help how to find the value sof x
of cubic polynomial
please help, I have exam in 2 days time and im losing hope... :c
Please show your work
Alright
I was trying to solve it
The equation on top is the equation i need to get lambda values for
If someone can help me get those please, it will be much appreciated
?
@idle bison Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can one figure our the height of a cylinder given the base area and the radius
Can't without knowing the volume
Burn it
@fierce gate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yo
or just multiply by 1+c
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@dire flame Has your question been resolved?
@dire flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dire flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone show me how to complete the square of this equation : x^2+y^2+6x+2y+6=0
i havent done this type of math in a while so i forgot what to even do for this
Typing this out will be painful - give me a moment to write.
http://mariosmathtutoring.teachable.com/p/huge-sat-math-review
Preview lesson for the Huge SAT Math Review Video Course by Mario's Math Tutoring. This is for the new and revised SAT.
0:19 Equation of a Circle
0:44 Introductory Example Identifying the Center and the Radius
1:12 Example 1 Finding the Equation of the Circle Given the Endpoints of...
wait but whats in the empty spaces
I was about to ask you - so I'm showing and not just doing.
Do you know how to complete the square?
i forgot , i haven't done this for like 2 years
It's the values that you plug in when you complete the square
Google is your friend
No worries - so, for the first blank - take half of 6, then square it.
Hence the video
What would that =?
Watch it
Yeah, that's a good idea. To brush up.
i found a video prior to asking but i couldnt figure out how they got the numbers in the blanks
9?
Then we'll go through it this way so you have a reference if that's helpful.
Right!
There are hundreds of videos
Try watching the one I linked, and try the math on your own
Post your work, and someone can check it
Ok, now for the second blank - you're going to take half of 2 and square it, and put it in the blank. Just like before.
What would go in that blank?
1
Great job.
thanks for the video
Math is balanced, and we just added a 9 and a 1 to the left side of this equation, right?
So, to keep it balanced, we must add a 9 and a 1 to the right side of the equation as well. That's what those blanks are for.
i see
I wouldn't phrase it like this tbh. Because one, you're spoonfeeding and two, the coefficients of x are always going to be 6 and 2, and three, you should let them try
Not do it for them
my brudda he is helping good
Okie doke - I'll back off. I just thought showing and then when they watch the video they'd have a reference to follow to know what steps to take.
man
PLEASE let him do what hes trynna do
Well, as you stated, you haven't done that math in like two years, hence the video, so watching that video could jog your memory on how to do it
i know but if i just have an example like this i can just refer to it
Then you can attempt it yourself with that video as assistance
The video has an example
aint no way
ok so is there anyway for you to let twentelise show me or is that off the table
Well, the purpose isn't to spoonfeed you and give you answers. You ought to try it on your own, and as I stated, that's what the video is for. If you watch it, it goes through that exact same process that twentelise is showing
right so the fact that i want twentelise to show me rather than the video has no effect on this
So you mentioned before, you haven't done that math in a while, that video is a way to help kickstart and help you recall that info. And as mentioned, the video and twentelise process is the same
why are you so good at avoiding my questions
You know, instead of the back and forth, you could have finished watching that part of the video
buddy
And tried it on your own by now
twentelise could have finished this whole problem with me by now
And you could have watched that video and attempted it on your own and finished it by now
why dont you want him to help me
the purpose isn't to spoonfeed you and give you answers. You ought to try it on your own
im not trying to get answers im just trying to understand the process
Look up resources if you forget certain processes
why would i be able to ask a question here if im instantly going to get shut down and told to watch a video
i dont like videos because i dont usually understand very well from them
so people like twentelise are my saviors
im tired now
So you're telling me that if you forgot the process of pythagorean theorem, you're going to go straight to a server instead of looking up some resources to jog your memory on pythagorean theorem?
yeah
thats why the math help section exists
doesnt matter what the question is
people are here to help and to answer
And google is there to help and answer too
Mind if I take over. This seems to have devolved into an argument. 😉
im just trying to understand why the person doesnt want me to ask a question here😭
its fine
im going to go now
I messaged you, potato. I didn't mean for it to go all nuclear here.
.close
Closed by @marble meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, i need help understanding market based analysis mathematically
@elder sphinx Has your question been resolved?
@elder sphinx Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can i get some help with b)ii)
i know that it is 2x+3y-z= ...
but i dont know how to find that constant
nvm i got it
.close
Closed by @green lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, when drawing a phase diagram of a linear system of differential equations, are we free to chose any variables we want for both axes ?
well it should be relevant to the system
It’s tripping me out
I’m studying the case of a system X’ = AX, A being a 2x2 matrix
Usually we construct the phase diagram using u1 and u2 as axes, both vectors being distinct eigenvectors of both eigenvalues
But in the case of A not being diagonalisable, we chose different axes
We chose z1 and z2 as axes, both of which being the coordinates of a vector Z that we considered being : Z = P-1 * X
My question is could we have drawn the phase diagram using u1 and u2 as axes ? U1 being an eigenvector and u2 a vector we whose such as u1 and u2 are linearly independent and P = (u1,u2) ?@fast peak
I’m stuck haha
I get this if i impose conditions on the constants
So i tried to deferentiate it and the derivative is positive if we have this :
But i can’t quite visualise how to represent -u2/u1 on my diagram
I am not exactly sure what you are trying to do here
drawing phase diagrams and trying to solve the system are two different things
Yep my system is solved, we get this :
Never mind language barrier is killing me
Maybe you can help me with another question, here we are approximating our solution by a function
My question is why don’t we have ln(C3 * s) at the very end there ? @fast peak
well I have no idea what is going on there
that said, remember log laws
ln(c*s)=ln(c)+ln(s) and then it would get merged with c1
I tried but surely if you use that you should end up with what we have plus a constant ? Lets say C3
you would get s c1+s c2 ln(c3) + s c2 ln(s)
the first two terms are just s*constants
so just another constant c4
so s c4 + s c2 ln(s)
Ohhh shit
Thank you man
Just couldn’t see that last part idk why
Ofc !
Thanks man take care ❤️ @fast peak
.close
Closed by @tired perch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @crude jackal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, in this scenario for a linear system of differential equations, does the value of a impact the phase diagram ?
I find this for a = -2
And this for a = 2
(Axes are the same on both diagrams)
Can anyone check if my diagrams are valid ?
This would be the general solution to my particular problem fyi
@tired perch Has your question been resolved?
@tired perch Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @tired perch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
List the side lengths of △FGH in order from smallest to largest, given that m∠H=58°, m∠F=54°, and m∠G=68°.
We can use the hinge theorem that states that the bigger the angle, the longer the length of the opposite side to the angle
Basically think of it like an actual door. The angle is the angle on how u open the door, and opposite side is the length of the opening in the door.
As you open the door larger, the angle opposite to the opening also get's larger
And because of how we use notation on triangles, we usually name the angle by using the name of the opposite side
that's why mF opposite side is also F just on how we usually name our sides and angles on a triangle
There you have it, now you can answer your question now
Closed by @slow cave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there a faster way of converting decimals to binary without using a table? like smth that could be quick to do on paper
there is
you divide the keep dividing the number by 2, and the remainder you get each time would be binary number. For example you have 57. 57/2 = 28 r1, 28/2 = 14 r0, 14/2 = 7 r0, 7/2 = 3 ** r1**, 3/2 = 1 r1, 1/2 = 0 r1
so you have the binary number of: 111001
hoping this explanation is understandable
@calm field Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am I write in thinking the least upper bound here is n=3?
Yes
or is there no l.u.b because sqrt(10) is not a positive integer
ok
I was kind of thinking of this example
you can't say sqrt(2) is the l.u.b because obviously it's not rational
Yes the difference is the domain
but there's no l.u.b at all because we keep approaching sqrt(2) and thus can't define the l.u.b
Yep the domain is key here
ok, thanks. get it
@manic nebula Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @manic nebula
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@fluid prism Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Sum of interior angles = (n-2) x 180
So for heptagon exterior angles would be 7 x 360 - (7-2) x 180
thank u
Don't give out answers
.close
Closed by @dense egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm confused here. Shouldn't they have found g'(x) and then g'(fx)?
why do you think that?
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any hints on how I can proof that for arbitrary polynomials p1,p2,p3 that (1-1/p1(n))^p2(n)<1/p3(n) for n large enough?
@inner mango Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was wondering if n=1 would this still hold?
if n =1 then S_n is the trivial group. There's only one element in it
Closed by @void arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i know to use the sum of arithmatic sequence formula here instead of geometric?
how would you use a "geometric" thing?
@wanton mesa Has your question been resolved?
Sum of geometric series
do you have a geometric series?
Yes?
Wait no
Because p =1
But if p is for example =2 it would be ageometric series wouldnt it
write the first 5 or 10 a_n and decide if it is or not. but your question was for 4,1,4,1,4,1,4, ...
But it isnt relevant if it is or not. you should calculate the sum 4.1.4.1.... and i think it doesnt matter which way you use to get this sum.
You should choose your prefered way.
Closed by @wanton mesa
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If 5 persons can do 5 jobs in 5 days then 50 persons can do 50 jobs in how many days?
I don't have a question about the problem
But what topic are these types of question considered in?
<@&286206848099549185>
Ratio and Proportion
oh ok ty
@warped gazelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @warped gazelle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this a sufficient proof:
Base case: If there is only 1 container, it must contain all m items, and m > 1.
Assumption: Assume that if m items are put into k containers with m > k, k = 1,2,3,...n, at least one container must contain more than one item.
Induction step: consider n+1 containers. Case 1: the (n+1)th container contains no items:
using the assumption, we know that one of the n containers must contain more than 1 item.
Case 2, the (n+1) container contains a ball:
if we have m > n+1, we also have that m-1 > n. Thus we can apply the inductive hypothesis and say that one of the containers belonging to n must contain more than 1 item.
@hollow moth Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@hollow moth Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@hollow moth Has your question been resolved?
ngl my induction is shit, but are you not supposed to prove n first?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Having quite a bit of trouble with these questions
If anyone could help me, that would be great
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
Oh
Need confirmation on how to do the first one
No idea how to do the second one
For the first one, is the root (x-6i)?
And is -6i expanded like any other variable?
Wait
Don't I also need the conjugate of (x-6i) to be one of the other 2 roots?
So (x+6i)(x-6i)(2x+3) are all the roots?
And I still don't know how to do the second one
@hoary hatch Has your question been resolved?
i think i solved the first one
but i'm still yet to figure this one out, and i'm quite lost
look at the discriminant
if the discriminant is negative, it only has complex roots
b²-4ac in relation to 0
oh
i didn't know that
i thought it only applied to where the parabola was on the cartesian plane giving you positive/negative
oh
it determines how many real roots the polynomial has
the standard cartesian plane is replaced with the real/imaginary plane
wait
but that doesn't??
why is this the case?
were not really doing that
so when u have a second degree polynomial and you want to get its roots, you use the formula
the formula has a sqrt(b^2-4ac)
you mean x=-b+-...?
so if b^2-4ac happens to be negative, the roots must be complex numbers
🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🫣 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 🍌 <- Tap
yes
lol
Btw quick question, k is 72 in the first one?
i don't think it matters what k is, does it?
Probably doesnt, but I was wondering, so asked
wait did your third root involve k?
i thought that the first 2 roots would be conjugates of one another, giving me (x∓6i), and using the last value, which is 108, i thought it would be like (x+3) or something
was that incorrect?
yea so (x-6i) and (x+6i) are roots
but to figure out the third one
you gotta divide the whole thing by (x-6i)(x+6i) = x^2 + 36
d in a standard cubic will always be the product of the last term in all 3 roots
and d is 108
o
yeah that makes sense
3 because (x-6i)(x+6i) = x^2 + 36
you squared the 6, but not the i??
but the leading coefficient is 2 so (x-6i)(x+6i)(x-3) doesn’t work
Oh oops 😅
oh
right
i did think of that
so i just put 2 before (x+3)
so (2x+3)
is that just a rule, or is there an explanation to it?
the formula for solving second degree equations has a sqrt(b^2-4ac),
so if b^2-4ac happens to be negative, the roots must be complex numbers
oh
i see
but that's the quadratic equation
why does it apply to a cubic in that way?
oh
the question 2 isnt a cubic
that's not a cubic
Because a cubic can be factorized in the form of two expressions:
[x-(-x)][x^2 + bx + c]
yeah, i just came to that conclusion myself
Wait which r we on?
#2 right now
i made an oopsie
we can always ping helper to see if we're missing something
or just expand it
ima try doing long division
we have 3 potential roots and an equation
i'm going to expand and see if i got it right
the first and last terms are right
and the second one, too
i did it
and x=72
@earnest perch@elfin stream
thanks for your help today
i'll be doing physics now
bye bye
.close
i think the coefficient of x isn’t necessarily 72
Closed by @hoary hatch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
why's that?
what
but i have all the roots
and i expanded the roots
what is left to be there but the full cubic?
@earnest perch
and if part of the cubic, like the x term, is missing, then is it not whatever was given in the cubic equation?
did i miss something?
it can't be anything else, though
oh how do you know
aight cya
.close
Closed by @hoary hatch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, does anyone know how to solve the 3rd one ? Thanks before
to calculate it, get the point where the line and the curve contact (which looks like its at about x=1.6)
then the shaded area is equal to the integral from 0 to 1.6 of the blue line’s function minus the integral from 1 to 1.6 of f(x)
does it make sense why that is?
I see
Thanks for the explanation. i'll try that
alr, and 1.6 is not the actual value
u gotta find it too
you’re welcome
.close
Closed by @wild owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What are the prerequisites for learning calculus efficiently?
Closed by @lone lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This question is about operators in Quantum Mechanics and linearity:
Are there theorems that deduce whether certain combinations of operators are linear or nonlinear?
e.g, consider operators Ai and Bi where all Ai are linear, all Bi are nonlinear
Can you say irregardless of what A and B are
-If A+B Is Linear/Nonlinear?
-If A-B is Linear/Nonlinear?
-If A1+A2 Is Linear/Nonlinear?
-If A1-A2 is Linear/Nonlinear?
-If B1+B2 is Linear/Nonlinear?
-If B1-B2 is Linear/Nonlinear?
Or will it always be a case-by-case, depending on which linear and nonlinear operators you have?
@opaque quartz Has your question been resolved?
furthermore, actually, what actually -is- the combination of operators A + B
e.g if A=dy/dx and B=(d^2y/dx^2)
what is (A+B)(f(x))
@opaque quartz Has your question been resolved?
the linearity of a combination of operators depends on the specific operators involved and how they are combined
first, the sum or difference of two linear operators is always linear. This means that if Ai is linear and Bi is linear, then (Ai ± Bi) is also linear
also
the sum or difference of a linear and a nonlinear operator is generally nonlinear. This means that if Ai is linear and Bi is nonlinear, then (Ai ± Bi) is generally nonlinear
example
generally, meaning this cannot be used as definitive proof?
consider the case where A = dy/dx (a linear operator) and B = d^2y/dx^2 (a nonlinear operator). Then, (A+B)(f(x)) = dy/dx (f(x)) + d^2y/dx^2 (f(x)) is a nonlinear combination
👍 i did figure nonlinear + linear would tend to be nonlinear and linear + linear be linear
i was more wondering if there was anything definitive to that
There is no definitive rule or theorem that can be used to determine the linearity of a combination of operators without analyzing the specific operators involved and how they are combined. The linearity of a combination of operators depends on the individual operators and their algebraic properties, so it is not possible to make a general statement that applies to all cases
but
there are some general principles, such as the linearity of the sum or difference of linear operators, that can be helpful in determining the linearity of certain combinations of operators. so though, determining the linearity of a combination of operators requires careful analysis of the individual operators and how they are combined.
that makes sense, checking for specific cases doesn't seem too hard anyway
that aside, if possible can i ask a question in the same field, about wavefunctions and probability?
what
what as in 'what you have said is just incomprehensible to me' or are you asking for the question
whats the question
this defines the probability of a tise in the region between a and b
does psi have to be normalised in order to compute this
or does it not matter
the wave function psi(x) does not necessarily need to be normalized
so normalisation is only needed for if we're computing expected values?
its necessary for any computation involving probabilities or expected values in a quantum system
is this for psi(x) specifically?
as in, what you are saying would not apply to a tdse, psi(x,t)?
normalization condition applies to any wave function in quantum mechanics, whether it is time-independent (psi(x)) or time-dependent (psi(x,t))
for a time-independent wave function psi(x), the normalization condition is expressed as ∫|psi(x)|^2 dx = 1
this means that the probability density function |psi(x)|^2 must integrate to 1 over the entire range of x
ah, i see my confusion
i read this as 'unnecessary' and blanked into 'okay, so what is it for'
that makes more sense
👍
Closed by @opaque quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is geometric reaosn why this has rank 2?
2 −4 10
2 3 −4
4 2 0
find the dimension of the image
Closed by @spark valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone help me with trigonometry identities?
$\frac{cos(A)}{1+sin(A)}+\frac{1+sin(A)}{cos(A)}=2sec(A)$
Astassa
Do you need to prove that this is true?
yeah
start off by turning the left hand side into just one fraction
i got this
$\frac{1+cos^{2}(A)+2sin(A)+sin^{2}(A)}{cos(A)+sin(A)cos(A)}$
Astassa
yeah thats right, but for now leave the denominator as cosA(1+sinA)
then then top can be simplified as cos^2(A)+sin^2(A)=1
SVRNHead
and can you see a common factor in the top and bottom that can be cancelled?
Closed by @outer pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i just dont understand this problem at all
(1+sqrt(5))/2 is 1.618, so am i proving that any fibonacci number is greater than 1.618?
you are proving the nth Fibonacci number is greater than phi^(n-2)
but yes, phi is just a number that's approximately 1.618
and n is greater than or equal to 2