#help-28
1 messages Ā· Page 41 of 1
barometer
oh so ur meant to solve it like that
well
you need to do that for each part and then see where the domains overlap
so we know that with an even root, like $\sqrt[4]{x-4}$, the argument $x-4$ needs to be positive, otherwise you get a non-real value
barometer
i get it now
okay cool
Closed by @fathom void
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
https://trinhngocthuyen.github.io/posts/tech/a-misuse-of-expectation/
not necessarily a problem, but I require some explanation. I understand math behind it, but as it happens with probability theory a lot, I donāt get the principle.
What is in fact E(Y/X)? What information does it give? Why it is different for E(X/Y)?
If it is essentially āaverageā of the X/Y why it is not just opposite of Y/X?
I understand the math, but I need some handwayvy explanation if that makes sense.
@sacred herald Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Iām sorry if this question doesnāt belong here. If anything, just delete it. I donāt know where else to ask.
@sacred herald Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, can someone explain to me what happened in the second step here?
they multiplied all terms with exp(-1/x), and a^-1 = 1/a
@muted flicker Has your question been resolved?
Still not seeing it. Can you rephrase it perhaps? I get the second idea about the applying a negative power
do the multiplications, what u got?
I'm slapping an exponent of -1/x onto 1 let's say...
Or am I interperting exp() wrong
Ohhhh ok
There's an e in exp()
OK I'm trying again
yeah, sry, exp(y) means e^y
what is 1/x - 1/x
Its a good day for me today
it's okay lol
Closed by @muted flicker
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Solution is incorrect and I cant spot my error. Any help?
@alpine chasm Has your question been resolved?
sorry i wish i could help but this is way above my level
Itās okay š I hope someone else can assist
ilk
@alpine chasm Has your question been resolved?
@alpine chasm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
Do you have a math question?
@lyric cipher Has your question been resolved?
hi
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the LS and RS formulas for a Riemann sums using sigma?
I don't think there is a formula for that
It's just adding rectangles
Same for trapezoidal sum
Closed by @steep fog
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help asap plz
I don't think it is able to solve it and give one of these answers
Do 3x=sect
Can you give another hint


Like i got that sec^2t/sec^2t-1 = csc^2t but what after that
Its more than a hint, its the entire processš
Lmfaoooo
Can you send a picture
Gold answer
it was not intentional
Im confused
Same
I meant this like a substitution
Ok
@prime fable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is slope of curve and tangent of curve same thing?
Its a question of literature on mathematics
typically the tangent is an equation for a line but a slope is just a number/expression
so for example say we have y=x^2+1, we then have at the point (0,1) that the slope is 0 but we have the tangent line y=1
in case you want a visual
Ohh
Graphically I thought they are both a straight line that connects the small change of function
well they are closely related
So slope is tan theta of that tangent
If that's what you meant
but my chemistry sir says that tangent or slope of curve concentration vs time gives the instantaneous rate of curve. He literally writes "slope or tangent of curve"
yeah i guess. slope is just tendency to increase in y when we increase x. tangent is a linear approximation of a function at a point
Mathematically that seems to be so, thank you for your teachings
np š
.close
Closed by @dim compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont understand why the answer to this question has to be x - p because surely x + p works just the same or am i missing smt?
The right part says something like "accept any of y = (x ± p)^3, doesn't it?
But yeah, since they didn't specify if p > 0 or not, either could work.
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Okay thank you I was just confused because it said 2 marks and the second mark was the x - p. Thank you for clearing that up
Closed by @wanton gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Whoops, closed the other one
Anyways
The existence of that sqrt(1-y^2) means that I made a mistake calculating the inner integral
Symbolab says I can find this integral using trigonometric substitution but thatās not something we learned and my teacher doesnāt like it when we use things we didnāt learn in class during exams
Thus this must mean that I made a mistake
U in high school or uni?
multivariable calculus without learning the trig substitutions?
my teacher doesnāt like it when we use things we didnāt learn in class during exams
Honestly this question is a lot easier if you use cylindrical coordinates
Like way way way easier
From the start
Uni, multivariable calculus yes
Have u done cyclindrical coords
Like the r^2, theta, r stuff
Oh, thatās later in this subject
hmm
Okay, and def no trig subs
Are you guys sure that I even did the first integral correctly?
I went over it and got the same answer
But maybe Iām making the same mistake over and over again
Havenāt tried it yet but ill go for it now, have an exam on this on Friday so Iām kinda fucked if I canāt do it
uh yea you made a mistake

you forgot the /2 part when evaluating the first part I think
so that sqrt(1-y²) terms cancels out that way
I did forget the 1/2 yea
Does that cancel out the sqrt tho?
Let me try again
Thanks btw .3.
yea see it for yourself maybe I'm mistaken too
This is the result
And yes
The sqrts cancel out
._. I am a n g e r y
Thanks though, both of you š
š¦¦
@slate reef Has your question been resolved?
Defo 2/3 right
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
given that $8^{2x+5} Ć· 8^3 = 4096$ , find the value x
Katze
help?
$8^{2x+5} Ć· 8^3 = 4096 \implies 8^{2x+5-3}=4096$
Duh Hello
Then take the ln
$8^{2x+2} = 4096$
Katze
4096 is also a power of 2
then you either take log base 8 of each side or you can try and find it in a simpler way
by just knowing what $8^y=4096$
Duh Hello
8^(2x+2)=8^4, entonces 2x+2=4, entonces x=1
why are you writing in spanish?
I am from ecuador
is it 2x+2?
yes 2x+5-3=2x+2
Right
??
the x is 1
yes
so the 1 doesnt matter right?
uh
well if you know that $8^4=4096$ then you would end up with the equation $2x+2=4$ which you can solve for $x$
Duh Hello
when you solve that equation for $x$ you get $x=1$ as the answer
Duh Hello
disregarding the fact that it's the solution. it's the identity element of the multiplicative set/group yes, in that matter it doesn't
all good :3
Closed by @spring hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
I have a series
The index starts at 1
The series sums elements of a sequence
The sequence goes
1,1,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.25,0.25,0.25,...
So we add 1+1+0.5+0.5+0.5+0.25+0.25+0.25+...
The ones are the only exception where we only have 2 such elements
Every other element comes up 3 times
I have to show that this series diverges
and can you give the exact problem statement?
I have to show that this series diverges
are you sure?
Denascite
That is what i did
I get 8
Im gonna think about the question a bit myself. Thank you^^
5
.close
Closed by @scenic wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
HELP
sure
so think it progressively
start on monday what is your probability that you are late?
0.7
progressing one day further you are on tuesday
and the probability that you are late on tuesday now has become?
0.6?
yes
since arriving on time is the probability of not being late
what does that wind up to be
hmm nope
rember that an event to happen certainly it has to have an probability of 1 (100%)
and for any event A, the chances are it's either that A happened or that A did not
so P(A) + P(A') = 1
where the notation P(X) means the probability of X and, X' means not X
are you with me so far?
wait so when u mean p(x) that means u cant have like 1+1=1
yea
oh okok
so you can't have A certainly happening and simultenously have A certainly NOT happening
this channel is occupied please book your own channel
!help
Please read #āhow-to-get-help
ok
so that makes A' arriving at time, yes?
sure
kk
it's more like arriving at time is the event of being late not happening but yes
recall P(A) + P(A') = 1
we know the value of P(A) for tuesday right?
0.6
wait whats the p
we can find P(A') from this
P is just the notation of asking the question "what is the probability of this?"
by arithmetic
oh ok
we get P(A') = 0.4 right
y 0.4
you can ask questions if there is something you don't get
because
0.6 + 0.4 = 1
we substituted 0.6 for P(A)
yep
wait then whats the 0.5 for
we still need to find the probability for arriving on time for Tuesday
I didn't mention a 0.5 anywhere
ik its in the problem thoigh
0.05*
ye sry
so we add 0.05 to 0.6 for the probability of arriving late on Wednesday
yes
ok
so far we got the probabilities:
Being late on Monday: 0.7
Arriving on time on Tuesday: 0.4
Being late on Wednesday: 0.65
right?
yes
since these are independent events we multiply them all
yep
@unique pecan Has your question been resolved?
yes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\frac{exp(z)}{1-z}=\sum\limits_{k=0}^{\infty}b_{k}\cdot z^{k}$
~Martin
b_k can't depend on z
you could also multiply both sides by (1-z) and then compare coefficients
split the RHS into two sums, re-index the second one and then put them together again
it may help to explicitly write out each side tho
just multiply the two power series
is this analysis 3 ?
yeah i thought so
why wouldnt you just take limit of both sides then
its screaming at you to do so
i see
oh yeahhh
power series work
bk cancels out
use d'alambert with absolute value
because we dont know if bk pos or not
you can usually do both find the coefficients and find the interval/disk of convergence with the ratio test.
then if <1 its conv
$|\frac{a(n+1)}{an}| = |z| | \frac{b(k+1)} {bk}|$ = \frac {-ez} {1-z}
Cyrenux
I tried this and got weird stuff
well the series is weird
so you now know that b_0 = 1
and b_k - b_(k-1) = 1/k!
so from that you can calculate all b_k
(at least in theory)
Why would b_0 be 1?
well the series on the left is 1+z+z^2/2+...
the series on the right is b_0 + (b_1-b_0)z + (b_2-b_1)z^2+...
Oh yeah true
But i dont think k can derive a formula for bk like that
Wolframalpha gives weird stuf for that
Sonething with a gamma function
well yes it is weird
Cyrenux said to use ratio test, do you think that would help?
or rather, trying to find a closed form is weird
ratio test is only helpful once you have the coefficients
but if you write them as a sum then it's obvious what they are
or rather what they approach
,w laurent series e^z / (1-z)
denominator looks like factorials. numerator looks difficult
b_k = b_(k-1) + 1/k!
Numerator of Sum_{k=0..n} 1/k!.
https://oeis.org/A061354
Wouldnt bk just be the sum from n=0 to k of 1/n!
Ok since i found a formula for bk i can now to ratio test to get the disk of convergence?
yes
Closed by @scenic wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, mind to help? im stuck on the second part ;-;
.close
Closed by @fluid kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this, I'm getting 2.8 as the answer in decimal form but don' tknow if that's right, and if it is, I don't know how to convert to the fraction form my platform wants.
it is
2.8=28/10=14/5
Mehdi_Moulati
Closed by @thorny prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just open a new channel
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got a maths test tmr yall pray for me fr fr
Closed by @tulip beacon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rccw
How do i get the x
Is the top angle a right angle
Is it isosceles
But we donāt have multiple side lengths, right?
That's right
I know it, but i don't think i need to use it.
With that information it isnt possible to find x
No just one
Well let's use cosine then
Is this not a right angled triangle though
I mean I don't think so
The exercise doesn't say anything about it having a right angle
I believe that opposite the 8.30 m there is a right angle
8.3dm
Myb the teach was smoking pot while making the exercises 
yeah i get what you are sayingš
Listen
You need more info to solve this
If you only know 1 angle and 1 side you cant find anything
Closed by @hybrid gulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i do this
Closed by @open knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, i've been given the centre of a circle as(3, 0) an radius5 so i got the equation
$(x-3)^2 + (y)^2 = 25$
NightHorn
the line y = 2x + k was also given and we were told it intersected at 2 points
i'm not sure where ive gone wrong as i know im trying to get it into a quadratic formula to solve with discriminant but i cant seem to do it, i've ended up with
$5x^2 - 6x -16 + k^2 +4kx = 0$
NightHorn
im trying to find K, sorry i forgot to mention
@calm steppe Has your question been resolved?
can you post the complete problem and the work you've attempted?
- A Circle has centre c(3, 0) and radius 5. The liney = 2x + k intersects the circle in two points. Find the set of possible values of k, giving your answers in surd form.
gimme a sec to type my workings
$(x-3)^2 + (y)^2 = 25
(x-3)^2 + (2x+k)^2 = 25
(x-3)(x-3)+(2x+k)(2x+k) = 25
x^2 - 6x +9 +4x^2 +4xk +k^2 = 25
5x^2 - 6x +9 +k^2 +4kx = 25
5x^2 - 6x -16 + k^2 +4kx = 0$
NightHorn
ffs it didnt space out, but i think you can get what i did from above
working on it š
your expansion and substitution is right though
okay
so you are right about the discriminant
2 solutions means that the discriminant we get from the quadratic $(x-3)^2 + (2x+k)^2 = 25$ must be greater than five
baro | awake
factoring
\begin{align}
5x^{2}-6x-16+k^{2}+4kx&=0 \
5x^{2}+4kx-6x+k^{2}-16&=0 \
5x^{2}+(4k-6)x+(k^{2}-16)&=0
\end{align}
baro | awake
now you have a polynomial where $a=5, b=4k-6, \text{and } c=k^{2}-16$
baro | awake
thanks!
Closed by @calm steppe
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it safe to say everything inside of an argument of a function is "reversed" from what you think it should be?
or is that a blanket statement and bad idea to go by for every single function argument?
for example with shift left with (x+12) instead of shift right
i see that but how about *12 and /12
how do you intuitively see that as stretch and compression?
also the idea of "opposite" gets really weird when you go ^-1
1 -> inf gets squished into 1 -> 0
i doubt most would consider that "opposite"
well, I see *12 and /12 as the y value intuitively. so when I see f(x) = 12x^2 I think to myself "vertical stretch". this is a tall and narrow polynomial
honestly i see 12x^2 as stretching it upwards
which is why i pointed it out
i can see how most would say + is right and - is left
so it's opposite there
also for the sign on the constant, in terms of moving the function up or down
sorry, wrong word. meant to say vertical stretch ^
that's just as you would think
x+2 is just move it up by 2
no wonky opposites happening here
alright so naturally I would see f(x) = (x^2)/12 as the opposite of f(x) 12x^2
vertical compression, squashed down and wider polynomial
yeah for y it's easier
but for x.. I plug in those same values into the brackets and i see weird things happening
like + is -
division is STRETCH, not compression
for moving left and right?
yes
i mean in my mind division is compress
yes, mine too
but not for this third example
below that one
fourth line
yeah, I can live with x-, i just need to remember it's the opposite for x
horizontal stretch and vertical compress is the same thing
according to WebWork it is not š
what is webwork
it's not because of the bracket i think
we call that "inside the argument"?
when it's in the bracket like that?
#3 is stretched horizontally by a factor of 12
i'd say that is compressed by 12
no

lol, care to elaborate?
if you rearrange y = 12x^2 so the coefficient is with one of the variables directly
yes
it'll be y/12 = x^2
that's cutting all the y values to a twelfth of its original value
so they call this changing the vertical scaling
either compression or stretching
so x^2/12 = y
this is actually x^2 = 12y
so all the y values got multiplied by 12
aka stretched upwards by a factor of 12
so that's why they call it "stretched vertically"
but we both said it's compression, when we see (x/12)^2. we are not wrong? or we are, with the terminology of what's being stretched and what's being compressed? x and y
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/fccz8bdpi6 here are all 4 together, they do look slightly different
it's arguable to say that the way they are saying is kinda right
the fact of the matter is
if you stretch is horizontally by 12
it's not the same as compressing it vertically by 12
it's the same as compressing it
but not by 12
yea
y = (x/12)^2
this is equal to y = x^2/144
144y = x^2
it's actually stretching vertically by a factor of 144
same as compressing it horizontally by a factor of 12
oh interesting, ya, these are the exact same
so compressing vertically = stretching horizontally,
and stretching vertically = compressing horizontally
it's just how they are defining them
that's why this is wrong
it's compressed, but not by 12
wait, so how do we get from top example to bottom example again?
as per this screenshot
we want to move the coefficient to the y value
it looks different to me, like x^2 has been moved to the left side of the equation where f(x) was
so we can see how it's stretch/compress ing vertically
so from y = (x/12)^2
we want to isolate the x^2
y = (x/12)^2
y = x^2/12^2
y = x^2/144
144y = x^2
now x^2 hasn't been changed but y has been changed
this is very disgusting wordplay, very confusing and unnecessary
i hate it, i hope you do too
and since f(x) is the same thing as y, we can do that
yea
haha, most of the time I am at war with math.. but when I get it I do enjoy it
haha
trying to avoid emotions with math .. it's hard to do tho, we are emotional creatures by habit
the cup is half full (positive) or the cup is half empty (negative) mentality, just that the cup is half capacity and I need more work to make the cup reach it's maximum capacity with knowledge and wisdom so to speak haha
I dunno, I'm trying to stuff philosophy into a subject that doesn't need it here haha
oh for sure, it's like a superpower has been unlocked, and I also find it's one of those things "use it or lose it", it's like "I just learned this one week ago and suddenly can't remember it at all anymore" haha. where it's good to keep practicing to keep the skills sharp
I like professor leonard's approach, the spiral method, good to go back on previous notes each day before learning new material
just to review, just write papers on
yeah, he's great. I think his videos are the only reason I have any hope of succeeding in calculus 1 this term haha
the university professor has kinda thrown in the towel, it's a bummer when you get in a classroom like that
but at least we have internet, and wolfram alpha to help. I think learning maths today can be a lot easier than in the 1800s. but maybe back then they didn't have as many distractions either lol
gotta stay focused, that's the key
alright, thanks for the help today! I will keep plugging away at this
.close
Closed by @dense edge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why are they neglecting writing the function v(t) and a(t) in those definite integrals? https://i.imgur.com/81c9xZU.png
That is, it should be (\int_{v0}^{v(t)} v(t) dt) for the LHS, and for the acceleration function, it should be, (\int{0}^{t} a(t) dt). So what's going on? Its really confusing me.
@quaint pendant Has your question been resolved?
@quaint pendant Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, how can I solve this problem?
Do you know what i^(any multiple of 4) is?
I know the sequence: i -1 -i 1
Write i to the powers of natural numbers and observe.
I don't understand how I can simplify that
Answer this.
I don't understand so I don't know
Have you did this?
what is i^4?
1
and what is i^8?
1
Right
do you understand that i^4 = 1 means i^(4n) = 1 for any natural n?
(or any integer n, really)
no it sounds a bit confusing can you give an example of what you mean
no
would you like me to explain these manipulations in more detail?
yes
$i^{40} \overset{{\color{red}(1)}}{=} i^{4 \cdot 10} \overset{{\color{red}(2)}}{=} (i^4)^{10} \overset{{\color{red}(3)}}{=} 1^{10} \overset{{\color{red}(4)}}{=} 1$
Ann
yes
do you understand the step marked with (2)? Y/N
hold on.
so still on 1st step
so you do not understand how to recognize 40 as a multiple of 4?
I don't understand the method you use. That I can do in my head but not for larger numbers
... okay let me try asking this again
the manipulations i've written out, independently of any method or lack thereof
do you understand the manipulations themselves? yes or no
(A) "yes, i understand them"
(B) "no, i don't understand one or more of your steps"
(c) "no, the fact that you don't adhere to a method i could replicate makes my brain unable to conceptualize any of this"
you yourself said i^4 = 1.
in step 3, i am applying exactly that
i^4 = 1, thus (i^4)^10 = 1^10
do you understand this?
yes it's 1 so where does the 10 come from
what do you mean, 'where does the 10 come from'?
step 2 left us with (i^4)^10.
the 10 stays as it is.
I got it now
okay, so then do you understand the sequence of steps as a whole?
yes
do you understand that a similar sequence of steps can be done to show that i^(4n) = 1?
well, we did not get to your problem yet.
227 is in fact not a multiple of 4.
does this fact need explanation?
I'll take your word for it
why take my word for it? you can see for yourself that 227 is odd.
so any number that is a multiple of 4 must be even?
okay
yeah
do you understand how to proceed from here?
well, now you know that i raised to the power of a multiple of 4 gives 1, yes?
yes
can you use this knowledge to simplify, at least partially, the expression i^200 * i^20 * i^7?
if there is a part that you don't know what to do with, then leave it be.
1 * -i
well, it looks like you have just almost solved the problem...
how did you do this step?
i wrote 227 as a sum of several things most of which were hopefully easy to recognize as multiples of 4
i did not want to risk confusing you by writing 227 = 4*56 + 3
so when solving similar problems I should try and split the number into numbers that are divisible by 4?
yeah, that will work. i'm not going to say you "should" do that though
you can also just take the remainder mod 4 of the exponent
I got the next answer wrong
what did you do?
are you familiar with divisibility tests?
well, you can look up more divisibility tests on your own time later, but
a number is divisible by 4 if and only if its last two digits form a number divisible by 4
and also, a number is divisible by 4 if and only if it is even and half of it is also even.
and you took i^2014 as 1, because you deemed 2014 to be a multiple of 4. is that what happened?
yes
yeah, that's where your mistake was.
2016 is a multiple of 4: its last two digits are 16, and 16 is 4*4
do you need me to explain why this is true in more detail?
even then how would I know if a larger number is divisible by 4 if the last 2 digits form a large number
how large a number do you think can be formed by the last two digits?
96
up to 99, but yeah
yeah but that is not even
still, it's not so large.
if you are unsure, you can simply divide it by 4, whether mentally or on paper, and see what the remainder is.
you know how to do long division, right?
yeah I think so
right
I should know
i can explain to you in more detail why the rule i said works, if you'd like to know.
the difference between any number and its own last two digits always ends in 00, and hence is a multiple of 100.
100 is a multiple of 4, therefore all multiples of 100 (which are precisely those numbers that end in 00) are also multiples of 4.
two numbers that differ by a multiple of 4 have the same remainder mod 4, therefore they are either both multiples of 4 or both not.
do you understand this?
I don't see how the first line can be true
nvm
but shouldn't that work for all numbers that 100 is a multiple of?
indeed, and it does!
Closed by @harsh halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
That's the question
My answer is
It is not marked as correct, but I don't know why.
@mossy sigil Has your question been resolved?
@mossy sigil Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I guess section is a 2D-plane?
yes it is
but the way the game works
is that I just have to trace the intersections between the 2d plane with the cube faces
Yeah, and there are way to many of them no?
I thought there's only 1 plane that satisfy all the conditions?
I'm not sure though cause there are both dashed and light lines that were added
dashed count, light line doesn't
Yes, there is only one plane satisfying these conditions
Ok, then explain how your 2D-plane traces an X on the bottom face of your cube? Seems pretty unlikely to me
my understanding is that the answer is the triangle over here
that triangle is part of a plane, the plane intersect the cube at that triangle, that traingle passed through the 2 corner points, the triangle is perpendicular with the original white diagonal
The line on the bottom face is dashed and not full
Also, are you sure that the third point of your triangle lies in the middle of the edge of the cube? How would you justify it?
yes. dashed line still count. I think all lines not on the facing surface is dashed
diagonal is perpendicular with diagonal right? if it started from the middle, then it will end at halfway through the edge
If you think this is the answer, why is the bottom red line (across the bottom face of the cube) not plain?
All lines on the bottom will be dashed, the only plain lines are the line on the faces of the cube that is facing us
the bottom face is hidden (we cannot see it if the cube is solid)
thus all line there are dashed (this is automatic)
Oh okay I get it, but then you added too many lines, by that I mean you added more lines that simply the trace of the 2D-plane section we want
Yes, the game allows it. I need to add more lines as constructor
Ok, now think about this:
Are you sure that the third point of your triangle lies in the middle of the edge of the cube? How would you justify it?
@mossy sigil Has your question been resolved?
okay so. The new diagonal is perpendicular with the original diagnal right?
And then that thin dashed line, is parallel with the new diagonal. That means it is also perpendicular with the original diagonal
Ah I see
so
I think
my 1st assumption is wrong
the new diagonal is not perpendicular to the original diagonal
am I on the right track now?
@mossy sigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(x-4)² - BD² = DC²
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
DC² = (x - 4)² - BD²
= (x - 4)² - (10x+ 5)² + (x + 10)²
= x² -4x +16 -100x² - 25 -100x + x² + 100 +20x
= 2x² - 100x² -104x +20x - 9 + 100
= -98x² -84x + 91
so :
DC = sqrt(-98x² -84x + 91)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ā
Closed by @past kraken
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
anytime
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How?
I don't get that when I put it in the calc
,calc (5/4877)^(4/5)
Result:
0.0040611945901459
Must be me then, but I have a fx-991MS for reference
Recall that $\sqrt[n]{a^m} = a^{\frac{m}{n}}$
dldh06
Can you show me what you typed in as the input please?
I'm guessing you didn't use enough parentheses
Do you have a picture of the expression in the calc?
Oh that is the same thing but in scientific notation
How do I switch that off
chartbit
,calc 4.06119459* 10^(-3)
Result:
0.00406119459
Can I change that in my Calc settinfs
Don't think you can tbh, those calcs default to that for really small numbers
Bruh
There might be a way to do it but I can't remember, it's been time since I had a calc like those ones
Closed by @weary stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
like what
?
The one in OP's picture, I have the ones where it does the "natural" looking outputs
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
iām suppose to be using polynomial identities to multiply the expressions
and i put it into mathway and donāt how it it go that answer
and idky what iām doing at all and donāt even know where to start
with (x+6)^2
How can u write (x+6)^2 also
I think they want you to use a^2 + 2ab + b^2
but if that confuses you you can use rainbow method
x^2+2x6+6^2
2 * 6 = ?
12
@hollow lintel Has your question been resolved?
@hollow lintel Has your question been resolved?
.reopen
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, can someone help me understand the Poisson Distribution, like how it may be derived from the binomial distribution?
say some event occurs lambda times per hour
then how do we find the probability of this event occuring say once in a minute?
if we know this probability and it is equal to p, then the probability of observing the event occur k times in 60 minutes would be (60 choose k) * p^k * (1-p)^(60-k)
how can we get to the poisson distribution from here
https://youtu.be/3z-M6sbGIZ0
im watching this video by khan academy, and they say that the probability is lambda/60
Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicingāand saving your progressānow: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/statistics-probability/random-variables-stats-library/poisson-distribution/v/poisson-process-1
Introduction to Poisson Processes and the Poisson Distribution.
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/pro...
but i dont see how that is possible, if lambda was like 120, 120/60 is 2 and that is certainly not a probability
the rate parameter in a poisson distribution is a measure of frequency
say you have a fixed time interval of 1
then Ī» tells you how many times you can expect the event to occur within that time interval
right..and using this information can we model this process approximately as a binomial distribution?
how would we use lambda in doing so
it says here that the poisson distribution is a limit of the binomial distribution
you model it as infinitely many binomial events occurring within a fixed time interval
and with what prbability do we consider them to occur
the limit is taken by increasing the number of binomial RVs to infinity
while smearing the probability across all of them evenly
but we do not have a probability to start with
we only know lambda events occur in this time
not a probability of them occuring
if this is difficult to answer can u give me a different intuition for like why the poisson distribution is defined the way it is
how does an e turn up in it etc
im just trying to recall the correct construction
you take the probability of each binomial to be p_n where in the limit np_n -> Ī»
so you can think of it as p_n = Ī»/n
the rate is smeared across all the binomials
oh...
so in total you might expect Ī» to turn out to be successes
but you're limiting n to be infinity
so the probability of success of any particular binomial goes to 0
oh ig i kinda get it
by "binomials" do u mean like individual trials?
yes
oh
it's like a random walk
oh
but you just think of it like smearing a probability across a very large number of binomials
bernoulli trials
okay..ig i get it a little better now
so like think of the jth X occurring at time j/n or something
within the unit interval
ultimately you'd expect Ī» of the Xs to succeed altogether
but there will be infinitely many of them in the limit
and is there like a different way of making sense of the formula for the poisson distribution, withut involvin the binoial distribution?
well this is how you can relate binomials to poisson
but poisson at its heart is counting events which occur at some frequency
and the events are happening in continuous time
what i really want is to like understand where the poisson distribution comes from, like why the formula makes sense
which formula
$\frac{\lambda^x\cdot e^{-\lambda}}{x!}$
SilverSoldier
well that arises from the limit
or if you want to construct it from gamma RVs you can do that too
but that also would be a limiting thing from geometric RVs
oh, idrk about gamma distributions
no š¦

i do know about like radioactive decay things
maybe this is kinda similar to that?
Those are modeled with decaying exponentials
counting process is poisson tho
waiting times are exponential
the formula kinda just comes from computing the limit
it's called the poisson limit theorem
oh
i think there's also another argument that can be made looking at generators of ctmcs
