#help-28
1 messages · Page 39 of 1
@calm field Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i do this
how do you get from 5 to 8 to 11
do you notice any pattern?
You add 3
Okay but how do you state this mathematically
i see these subscripts n they confuse me
$a_n=a_{n-1}+3$
Splash
n is the one you are at right now
What do the n's and n-1's mean ?
since you are at the second one (8)
n is 2
so the second in the sequence is 8
so 8 = 5+3
Oh okay
so how do you get from 38 to 27 to 16
Hmm
minus 11
What does subtracting 1 do ?
this kind of formula is used to describe the sequence at any step n, it simply means that $a_n$ the value at step number n can be expressed as some formula (recurrence formula) that involves the value at the previous step (so step number n-1) which we denote $a_{n-1}$
Benjamin
Ohhh ok that explains it thank u
and here the way is to add 3 to the previous one
as you can see reading the formula
My teacher also did this thing
Where he put n > 2 or something like that
what does he mean by that?
it means that the formula works for the steps bigger than 2
and doesnt for step 1
since step 1 is the first you cant get it from a previous one
Ohhh
so you must state the value explicitely
Thank you
Benjamin
$\forall n \geq 2, a_n = a_{n-1} +3$
Benjamin
?
it reads as "for all"
Oh okay
"for all n bigger than 2 , the formula is true"
or just say $a_0=5$
Splash
and then state the eq
yep
tn = tn-1 + 3, n > 2
probably $\geq$
Benjamin
not >
oo okay thank you
I understand now so i will close this channel thank you guys
.close
Closed by @wraith river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Whats the domain of this
when is the inside positive?
$y = \sqrt{\cos(x) + \sqrt{3} \sin(x)}$
Herels
we can rearrange this thing to make things easier
$y = \sqrt{2\left(\frac{1}{2} \cos(x) + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \sin(x) \right)} = \sqrt{2} \sqrt{\sin(\frac{\pi}{6}) \cos(x) + \cos(\frac{\pi}{6}) \sin(x)} = \sqrt{2} \sqrt{\sin(x+\frac{\pi}{6})}$
Herels
now its easier to find the domain
Closed by @pearl timber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question: Calculate sqrt(1.1) with an error less than 10^−4 using the Taylor expansion of the function f(x) = sqrt(x + 1) in a setting of a = 0.
To calculate such error, we know that is will be equal to:
Well how do you find the maximum of a function
Well calculate enough derivatives until the error is smaller than 1e-4
or evaluating the extremes of the intervals
is there any way to know beforehand how many derivatives i'll have to compute?
cz, if f(x) was sin(X), then i could just upperbound the function to 1
Yes sqrt is not that easy sadly
okey
But still not too bad
@late tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @late tinsel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Now consider this case where 4 1 2 are the value of f level curve, now the one intersecting the curve has maximum value whereas the one touching it has neither maxima nor minima, now here won't the logic of lagrange gets defeated?
@brisk sorrel Has your question been resolved?
, rotate
What is your question precisely, @brisk sorrel ?
That doesn’t help anyone help you. You can’t just expect people to know what you’re asking
Was the above still your question?
Did you read this and still didn't understand my doubt
Much more clearer diagram
<@&286206848099549185> please respond, i ll even restate my doubt, what i am saying is in the picture above, look at the dffrnt points where g meets f and for the gvn constraint g the 4 one looks like a maxima but still according to the lagrange multiplier only 2 is selected as candidate point, so it defeats our purpose of finding the best candidate point to find maxima and minima along the g curve
<@&286206848099549185>
@brisk sorrel I would suggest asking in #multivariable-calculus
Ok
@brisk sorrel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brisk sorrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
suppers
oh which part?
a bruh i said it above
ohh sorry I didn’t see that haha
np
maybe you can try $\frac13 \int{sec^{n}3x (3sec(3x)tan(3x))}dx$ and go from there
Polipoli ❤
okay!
u-substitution :
put u = 2x +1
u = 2x + 1
du = 2 dx <=> dx = du/2
when x = 0 , u = 1
when x = 1 , u = 3
Mehdi_Moulati
$\int^1_0 \frac{1}{(2x+1)² + 3} dx = \int^{3}_{1} \frac{1}{u² + 1} \* \frac{1}{2} \* du$
Mehdi_Moulati
what i get after ?
what should i get after integrate
never done this question before
$\begin{bmatrix}
\frac{1}{2\sqrt3} \tan^{-1}{\frac{2x+1}{\sqrt3}}
\end{bmatrix}^{1}_{0}$
Polipoli ❤
I think you should get this
Mehdi_Moulati
yep! do what mehdi said :D
Mehdi_Moulati
@alpine girder Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there a mathematical operator that removes units
like meters or seconds so i only have the number
I want to calculate the escape velocity of a mass from the Uranus
Im already done but I am not given a mass so my answer is just
2,279 x 10^8 x mass (in kg) x m^2/s^2
I would like to have an operator so that I can split the mass of the satellite or whatever in the skalar and in kg
.
because the answer should be in Newton * meter
yeah but then I split the mass in kg and the skalar
Gijs
dont I need an operator for that
if your answer should be in N * meter then you are already done
and your answer is 2,279 * 10^6
Closed by @hollow zenith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey, could this be an exam question?
Nah
this seems suspicious
Somebody give me
yeah
Gave
5-7-9-11...
,ti
The current time for 𝓐𝓡𝓝𝓐𝓑 𝓟𝓐𝓛 is 03:50 AM (IST) on Wed, 04/01/2023.

I know
Exam at 4am?@frosty geyser
vpn
Really
Also you are asking someone else's question
well anyway, someone kindly gave you the first differences, so the rule is obvious now?
I know
??
Quadratic sequences, how to find the formula for the n-th terlm, using the difference method.
Quadratic sequences of numbers are characterized by the fact that the difference between terms always changes by the same amount.
Consequently, the difference between "the differences between the sequence's terms" is always the same. We say that the sec...
5,7,9,11 we Just add odd number starting from 5 to the constant
But how can we write it
so every step is +2 more than last time
Yes
something like... 2n right?
2n+1?
well, for n=1 you must get 5
hint: subtract 8 from each element in the list
2n+3
you will see the pattern immediately
not yet
lets take it slow
Ohhh
now you need to apply it to the bases
How
I still don't really know why you are asking someone else's question.
Ummm
It's not your question. That person who asked could be in a higher level math, meaning that you could be lacking the prior knowledge you need
Well sometimes I can't solve some problems so I just want to clear it like that
So it's best to learn that
This video helps
Ohk
It demonstrates how to find the first and second difference, then what to do after
Closed by @void widget
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A small section of a graph is shown below. Evaluate the shaded area enclosed between the implicit curve, the x-axis and the y-axis correct to five decimal places.
what techniques are you supposed to use
Any
I am learning calculus

are you supposed to use a programming language?
Nope
is it on rad or degrees?
or a graphing calculator?
I don't know but we can build intuitions
Rad?
the intuition is to use a graphing calculator or programming language
Yeah i know
did this problem come from a worksheet?
No I got this from a math forum
so the answer doesn't have to be exact correct?
give us the link, if you would?
I think this could be done by hand I don't know...
how tho
An international group that constitutes students, teachers , professors and all other mathematicians.
Learn mathematics , physics and any science related courses
We are learning together.!!�
Here...
this group is private
screenshot the entire post, with all accompanying text and instructions.
YOU think that or someone else says you can do this by hand?
Oh I forgot that
You are supposed to this by hand because otherwise they wouldn’t give it
who's "they"
screenshot the entire post, with all accompanying text and instructions.
we CANNOT proceed unless you comply.
so nothing about this says you're supposed to do it by hand.
Idk
so you made this up?
I never found any math in that group which can't be done by hand and It's also not allowed to post such maths there
If it's possible to do by hand, doesn't necessarily mean that all the problems have to be done by hand
and no one would ever post something not allowed somewhere
and read all the rules before posting
has anybody posted any comments on this post?
I know but can you explain why it is not possible?
No
it's not that it's impossible -- you could, in principle, reproduce any computer's calculations given enough time and paper -- it's just painful.
and you might die before you are done
I see 😅
What's the approach to solve this though
i havent a fucking clue to be honest
probably use newton to get your function y(x) and then numerically integrate as usual?
the graph ressembles a triangle so maybe you gotta use the formula A=bh/2
i know that it isn't exact but
it's nowhere near enough precision, is it
I haven't learnt multi variable yet so I have to know about the approach
Multi variable calculus*
have to? lol
Why can't we use direct integral?
on what function
we dont have a function f(x) to integrate
not explicitly anyway
and I very much doubt that you can solve that equation for y
I guess limit series expansion could help
I doubt it but feel free to try
Sin(u)= u-u^3/3!+u^5/5!-...
this is getting wild, we got a series with a y as exponent in every term
Yeah u are right
there's no way we could calculate by hand without the help of computers
what did the guys over at facebook say?
did they find an answer to this mess?
Nope
Should I close it?
eh we can atleasr approximate it
up to you. I doubt you'll get other answers from here which will say something other than "throw a computer at it"
@tardy lotus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
An equation in r and theta can represent a curve in the plane with respect to polar coordinates. The straight line 2x-3y = 5 has a polar counterpart r(2costheta-3sintheta) = 5. How does that represent a line since theta is a fixed value so is r no? meaning that equation represents a point [r,theta]
no, r and theta are not fixed values
just like how x and y aren't fixed values
but a line always has the same angle with the polar axis no?
don't confuse lines with rays
in this case, theta is fixed to 2 values
even so, theta and r are independent of each other
Can you perhaps construct a few points of the line using the polar equation? Maybe that way i'll understand
a few good examples here
https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Algebra/Book%3A_Algebra_and_Trigonometry_(OpenStax)/10%3A_Further_Applications_of_Trigonometry/10.03%3A_Polar_Coordinates
I'll give it a read thanks!
I'll keep the channel open
Ohhhhh
so r = equation for all theta
i was thinking of r as a vector instead of a coordinate
so i imagined r changing while theta stays constant but r changes with inputs theta
okeyy polar coordinates make way more sense now
Closed by @tribal gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Would it be fair to say r is a function r: [0,2pi] --> R: theta --> r(theta)
nope
why not
not always at least.
ooh yeah not a function but a map, or well just a relation not bounded by "for every x there exisys only one y" stuff
it's probably better to just keep them independent of each other
For class i will but out of curiosity i'd still like to know the details haha
sure, but i don't know how that benefits you
Makes more sense to me idk
- its fun to have your 'insights' verified, as small as they may be haha
Anyway thanks again!
.close
Closed by @tribal gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi!
hi
I tried this but am not able to get the form they want
can someone try to see where I went wrong?
I colour coded so it might be a little more clear
i cannot find the mistake
Respect for showing what you tried and making it look nice
What is a chord to an ellipse?
Just any line that goes through it not being tangent?
also if d has a ² in the ym coordinate doesn't the d in the xm also need a ²
but i have been looking at your drawings for a full 10 minutes and i couldn't find a mistake, so i came to the conclusion that it is probably a typo made by them. idk
the cord of ellipse will satisfy the two equations at two points
don't know why I said it
they already have solved it
what language is that lol
english?
looks like the georgian scipt
lmaooo
ayo wtf that looks like what OP wrote lol
@slow gulch Has your question been resolved?
hi!
oh okay! ty! I also couldn’t find any careless mistake haha
don't take me as fact
ohh it’s Burmese sorry! I forgot to crop it out
i just couldn't find the answer
Asking again, @slow gulch, is a chord just a line through an ellipse?
I'm 90% sure
the answer is yes
*95%
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@slow gulch is this part right?
ah nvm, it is
Nope, your work is perfect
.close
Closed by @viral jasper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @low quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don’t really know the rules of how to solve these types of problems because my math teacher speaks in moon runes, can somebody dumb down the process for me a bit? Like rules and basics that can get me through this
Well let's start with 12th, okay ? @frank stump
you understand the principles of rearranging
The knowledge I have to go off of is how to factor something like x^2+10x-5=0
I can show you something called the diamond method
Lol moon runes
Alright
That is quite reasonably easy to understand
hey guys, can i get some assistant with something?
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Three positive integers are equally spaced on a number line. The middle number is 15, and the
largest number is 4 times the smallest number. What is the smallest of these three numbers?
Read #❓how-to-get-help
So do you know the factoring rules
Yeah
@frank stump lets start with question 12
This channel is occupied by someone else, you need to open your own channel
I’m a tad slow but yes
12/t + t -8 = 0
Read #❓how-to-get-help to figure that out
done i opened a forum
so you would want to get it into a straight line equation
or you can have everything have a common denominator
Or don't do any of that, because that makes it complicated
hmmm fine you'd rearrange first
the equation
You have a fraction, the first and easiest step is to clear fractions
No
thats rearranging it
:I
Well dont argue now I’m open to hearing multiple methods
You can multiply all the terms by the lcm
No it's not
Rearranging is moving terms around
lmao you'd want to get a straight line equation
That's not what I'm doing
Just say what to do don’t worry about arguing
So you have a fraction with the denominator of t, how do you get rid of it
Multiply by t
what would you multiply by t
.
12/t
Ah
so if you multiplied 12/t + t - 8
Oh, so it would become t^2+4
what would it look like after
?
not quite
My bad
we dont know what t is
t^2-8t+12
You need the = 0 part too
Because that's what makes it an equation
Well look it’s self explanatory
I definitely dont forget to put it on my answers and get marked down for it
There is a difference between expression and equation, what you have typed is an expression
You hhave to remember you also have to times the left hand side which in this case is 0 by t
Meaning you don't "solve" for anything with an expression
When you have = 0, that denotes as an equation
It would still be 0 tho
yes but im saying for other equations you cant forget to
Ah, thank you
okay so now we know 12 + t^2 -8t = 0 whats the next step
Oh so now I just do it normally
which would be doing what to the equation
To get -8 from factors of 12, -6 and -2 should work, meaning x=6 and 2 right?
yeah
Sweet
(t-2)(t-6)=0
so as you said but you'd have to write (t -6)(t-2)
yeah
exactly
to get full marks
he did it
Mannnnn get this guy out the chat
First, this is wrong because there is no x
No I did that
he said t = 2 and 6
And second, if this is what you have, you did not solve the equation yet
oh yes sorry I onyl saw the () one oops
No they did not, they said x = 2 and 6 which is wrong
I’m not gonna argue to validate the fact I answered a math equation
alr 2/y+2 + 3/y = -y/y+2
So I’m going to ignore you indefinitely
And I'm gonna argue the fact that it should be done properly
Multiply by Y, get /2 for the other two
Because if there is miscommunication, people aren't going to understand what you mean
2/2+3=-y/2
If you decided to write x instead of t, on a test, it could be marked wrong because you threw in a letter that never existed
And no, this is wrong
im back
You don't multiply by y
okay so we want to completley get rid of them
-8=y
with one multiplication
You multiply by the lcm of the denominators
That is what I got
And the lcm is not y
?
.
so i dont think its right
Damn
Alright
You multiply by the lcm of the denominators
And the lcm is not y
YOOOOO
y = -8
doesnt have to be lcm can just be a common multiple
alr what first
Multiply by b
what we get
and does that seem correct
Not exactly
yeah okay so a new way
There is no b in the numerator so I gotta do something else
That is wrong
so
You are teaching absolutely wrong
I’m surprised this man is marked ‘helpful’
Well you are being quite obnoxious doing it
So you can either listen to lima and be wrong every time or I can help you
No if you talk to me like that
Because I know how to approach these problems properly
whats going on here
Idk at this point
The obnoxious part is because as mentioned, if you write x instead of t on tests, you will get points off
yea y does = -3
If you don't present properly, you will get points off
I will resume ignoring you indefinitely
So I will backtrack to figure out what I did wrong
Fine, listen to the people who gave you wrong answers
Lemme write this down rq
Because you have (b+1) and (b+2), you wqant to multiply everything by (b+1)(b+2)
yeah ikik
and then for the y equation y(y+2)
ik i was just having somefun
knows its wrong dw
whatd you get for 16 ryan
Why tho
If you know it's wrong, don't teach people the wrong thing
What is lcm
you know what the LCM is?
Lowest common mulitple
than fractions are gone
lowest common multiple
You're trying to eliminate the fractions
Alright so is it just
The easiest method to finding the lcm of the denominators is just multiply all the denominators together
All the different denominators side by side
in Q14 LCM y(y+2)
I’m stubborn and spiteful so I am going to not acknowledge that dld answered my question
Despite the fact I just did
so the only way to eliminate b+2 is to times it by b+2 but that dont get rid of b+1 so you have to multiple (b+2){to get rid of the 2 b+2 denominators}(b+1){to get rid of the b+1 denominator}
Ahhh okay
just real quick number 16 you already have common denominator
he's doing 16 rn
I’ll come back in a second when i have an answer
You're kinda doing 2 steps in 1
yeah like I plugged in just to double check but the equation in desmos 1/x+2 + 1/x+2 = 2/x+2
And the fact that I am giving proper help then saying
ik i was just having somefun
knows its wrong dw
so you can just start 16 with 2/b+2=3/b+1
I have blocked him I am no longer bothered
i think theres a bot for that
but idek how to use it lol
It really doesn't and I would help but the OP doesn't care for my help
Latex is simple
but google hardly works when you type in equations
Once you get the idea
I got -4=b
thats wrong
right on
huh
its a joke dw
u sure
Yeah no
yes im sure he's right i got it dwdw
ehehehhehe
oh
Dont feed my bad habits Lima
It isn’t a joke I think you just struggle a bit as well
-4 is correct
Or are trolling idk
17 is fairly doable
lmao true
ryan u familiar with the quadratic eqn
i done 17
im starting to understand why people hate maths lmao
I have done 42 😎
if this is all youre forced to do i wouldnt like it much either
EEEEEE
Nothing beats doing 100 fourier series
a/sqrt(2pi) * exp(-x^2 / 2) for a = 1, 2, ..., 100
gul did you do it
For a=1 e^(-x^2/2)/sqrt(2pi). QED
yes\
A = 3/2 and -1
@stable crow just checking u get same
messed up a little
No wait
Yeah
yea lima thats the ans
A = 3/2 and -1/4
That is what I got
show your working
ryan did u factor out 3 and 4
in the denominators
Or you can point out where they messed up
you multiplied wrong on thhe fractions
so when you tried multiplying
its better in these type of 3 different denominator questions
to transform them
factorise the denominator
rather than just multiplying them all together against everything and making a mess
Alright
But that doesnt explain what I did wrong
Yea I did it the long way but did I mess up on it?
bc your multiplication was wrong
Cuz if I did my calculator is of concern
how exactly
doing equations like this is very
hard thing to do on calculator
better to do it on paper following methods
What was your lcm?
I typed each section out separately and multiplied it by the lcm
what would the LCM be
(a-1)(a+1)?
(3a+3)(4a-4)(2a+2)
thats
Fyi if you aren't the OP, you should really be giving answers
sry bout tht
It's easier to factor out, so then you can clearly see the lcm
If it overlaps, meaning repeats in other denominators, then you just need it once
you dont wanna be multiplying big LCM's you wanna make them as simple as possible
^^
I get that, but I do multiply big things
Like 1/2 and 1/4, a possible denominator is 8 because multiplied all the denominators together, but a better denoominator is 4
Because a calculator did it
?
In my opinion, hard to tell since you just went straight to that line
okay im gonna try do what you did and see if i get the same as the calculator
it wont be
Alright, I’m gonna trace back and figure it out
or scrap that method and do it as factorising to get the simplest LCM
What exactly did you do here?
writte
You skipped a lot of math so it's hard to understand the process that occurred
I wrote each thing into the calculator times the lcm
well i just did 7a(3a+3)(4a-4)(2a+2) and i got -14a^4 + 182a^2 + 168
so off of that ik it wont work
Fyi people can do it their way if they want, you don't need to force a certain method, if ryan wants to do lcm, they can
As in (7a/3a+3)•((3a+3)(4a-4)blah blah blah that was the just of it
But the right numbers
Then i stuck them all together
yeah just divided the 3a+3 rn and i got -14^3 + 42a^2 + 56a
(7a)(3a+3)•((3a+3)(4a-4)
If that was what you used as the lcm, can you explain where (x - 1) and (x + 1) came from?
he did say. he just copied the calculator
I wasn't asking you
i mean we've asked abt 6 times same response
I am trying to understand what the OP did step by step
dont think much gonna change
Stop being a dick
Hes right
But I’m getting nowhere here
I’ll try again on my own
What exactly did you type into the calculator?
I have been told nothing about how to do that
so
3(x+1)
well 3(a+1)
Yeah yeah
try keep the algebriac expressions the same as the question
That seems like desimplifing
Ill figure it out from here
there is a different way u could have found it
and then factor the rest of the denominators
what way did you do
idk what its called
its like using common division
wait ill see if i can google it
24(x-1)(x+1)^2
Factored
Okay
Yeah i did that all
okay show me the equation
looks something like this
right okay
Put them all together
Mostly because I’ve spent half of my day doing this math and im tired
you want to reduce now
Alright how about we all calm down, because the work you have is good, I know where it went wrong
So you can either reset and do lima's method or I can tell you what went wrong
Tell me
It was this part right here
You divided by 2 for some reason
If you didn't you would have gotten a = 3 and a = -1/2
tbf if you didnt the answer woudl be right
O
but the only thing is these questions will appear in non calculator exams
Well that was simple
Dont have those
so its good to know how to do it without one aswell
do you not????
Nope
where you from??
My teachers are the type that say ‘look if I’m going to compare prices at a grocery store I’m not pulling out a notebook I’m using my phone, so I will be teaching you how to use your phone calculator like a god’
is q 17 resolved
mental maths more satisfying tho
Yes
Yes
nice
yeah he divided it by 20 and thought he only done it by 10 so did it by 2 again
Well my mental sorrows leave no room for math
Aka
My brain is tiny and it hurts without paper
Or calculator
fair enough
i factorised and just went off that
then reduced by x the top of all fractions by 12(a+1)(a-1)
Tbh in the real would, nothing is mental. Like you will always have a calculator on you, internet, so on. Like teachers making you memorize is both good and bad, good so you can understand an apply it but bad since in the real world you'll have resources to use
true
Yeah! They are smart to teach us how to use the tech
Just too bad they don’t know how to say things in dumby terms so my adhd can gather anything
nowadays graphical calculators are allowed in highschool exams
good example of use of tech
BRO WHAT IS THIS
IN the uk
we get given ours at the exam
yea
we're nota llowed our own
tough
All they need to say for me to understand is ‘this number’ but I hear ‘integers’ and stuff which I understand yes, but it takes my brain a minute to process and then im lost when i refocus
You understand that there are other countries besides the UK, people do things differently everywhere
There’s where you went wrong /j
He’s just finding out that why hes reacting like this
How do I close this btw
guarantee most countries do not allow graphical calculators in finals
this one
thouch im allowed
its to expenxive to actually get
only the rich kids has tht privlege
alr ryan u can close it now
.close
Closed by @light sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Lol
It's .close
.close
But I already did it
Ah
When you see this message, you are good
how come it didnt close when tyoed it
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
typed
It takes a few minutes for the bot to close it
.close
Closed by @light sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You need special roles
its already closed
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, does anyone know what type of encryption this is?
TfZgmUn8N8KPZ4L+rWCqKvjGSnKogGvc609FOt/3wIX7n94+i/R4y5V5hzqYvX1kQdIrpdaZF20BEKHIcfnzqR/sbTWmMngjk01SJQyOwHurdmWAamb7jyUzjf1uiiKvzzisxd83WfGZNUZ1I+Ou8C5wOESQwbB2Ufm1gi27tXw=
SHA256
jk i have no idea
@still crater Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Property of Dirac delta
i understand delta function but how a/2 is inside sin and
integral of sin didn't change
what about the term of sin squared
how was it integrated
isn't The integral of sin2x is x/2 - (sin2x)/4 + c .
Bottom property
Closed by @silk solstice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Descartes' Folium is given by the parametric equations: see image. Find a Carthesian equation of the Folium. Make a sketch of the curve and show that the line x + y = -1 is an oblique asymptote
I honestly have no idea how to tackle this. I found the points (0,0) and (3/2,3/2) by figuring out that y=xt for t in R-1. And y=x for t = 0 and t = 1. But idk how else to identify the curve
I have yet to find a cartesian equation im just trying to sketch it first but perhaps thats the wrong approach
what's your Cartesian equation
no idea
for a real number z can i simplify z^2/(1+z^2)?
algebra is a lil rusty
Not really no
Why what went wrong
i thought maybe x^2+y^2 would give something interesting but it solves for a disc in the plane with center (0,0) and a missing ring for r = -1 = 1 (probably because i did it wrong)
so im gonna try just solving for t
You know t = y/x
Just plug that into one of your equations and you're basically done
Do you think you need to?
i have no idea honestly
y = yx^2/(x^3+y^3) is not something i recognise
Well you're not being asked to recognise it
Bc obviously it's descartes folium and if you've never seen that before why would you recognise it
oh yeah ig this is a cartesian equation but i still need to sketch the curve
and show it has an oblique asymptote y = -1-x but i think i can do that with implicit differentiation
This is also wrong anyway
y = 3y^2x / (x^3+y^3)
anway, the sketching, im thinking just plugging in points tbh but i bet there's a more efficient method
plugging in points is probs your best bet tbh
alright
I think it'll be easier if i show that it symmetric around y=x, that way i have to plug in less points
how can i do that?
swap the places of x and y and show you get the same equation
ahh yeah thanks