#help-28
1 messages · Page 35 of 1
15.1?
colour
green
yes, and its length is 15.1 (that was going to be my next question)
so this means this is correct? 15.1^2 = 12.8^2 + b^2
noone said it wasn't
and it was implied that it was correct
your identification of what b represented was incorrect
you implied that you knew the length of the red leg was 12.8
your b represent the length of the third side of that right triangle highlighted in blue
so 12.8 is not b?
in your initial equation no
why?
because its what you wrote
in your equation
15.1^2 = 12.8^2 + b^2
you were using a to represent the length of the red side which is 12.8
which led to the approximation of b to be 8.01
there was no issue with any of that
and as mentioned earlier
swapping a,b doesn't really matter if you're being consistent
a represents one leg of your right triangle and
b the other
but it does not matter right?
ohh okay
not if youre being consistent
you could've started with
15.1^2 = 12.8^2 + a^2
just instead of b representing the initially unkown side,
a would represent that
that's what i've been saying this whole time
no
i never said x is 8.01
i confirmed that the b in your original equation you set up was approximately 8.01
that b is a side of your right triangle
(x is NOT a side of that triangle)
applying pythag doesn't immediately give you x
your b represents the length of the third side of that right triangle highlighted in blue
8.01 is the (approximate) length of the blue side in my colour coded diagram
but how do i get x?
apply properties of radii
and apply (segment) addition/subtraction
note that the segment you highlighted at the very start (now coded in purple) was actually a radius of the circle (which is given)
ohh so x is the whole radius?
8.01 + 8.01 = 16.02
16.02
no
Hint: you should be able to just read it off
why?
things that look around the same or even the same might not be the same
12.1?
no
i am getting confuse now
recall the definition of radius
Why did you say 12.1?
typo
radius is any line from the center extending to any point in the circle
On the diagram, do you have any such line?
yes
this one the violet
...do you have another one?
yes the 15.1
There we go!
With that, can you tell me a relationship between b and x from this?
b and x are segments of the radius?
Well, that wasn't what I was looking for...
Using the fact that the radius is 15.1, can you tell me what x is now?
ohh so 15.1-8.01?
so its 7
That's what I was looking for 😉
15.1 - 8.01 isn't quite 7
Closed by @light scaffold
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
s = Vo * t + at^2/2
How would i solve out "a" in this case
In my head it would be fine to multiple Right side with 2 and the same with left side to move the /2
But my teacher moves the Vo * t first
Is there a reason to why that is?
Doesn't matter you'll get the same result at the end
I must have done something wrong because i'm not getting the answer that i'm looking for.
Is it because the *2 should be with every term on the left side?
@next basalt Has your question been resolved?
wdym?
That's where you went wrong, do you see why?
no
Don't you think that should be 2v_0?
@next basalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @next basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you rewrite the entire equation in terms of ln(x)
change of base formula
log_a(x) = log_a(b) * log_b(x)
yeah i just don't understand what it means to write the entire equation in terms of ln(x)
write log x as an expression involving lnx
how would that look like not worked out
not worked out?
without change of base done
well change of base is exactly how you do it, so im not sure what you mean
yes
and log is log base 10
ok, question
is it
f(lnx) = log(x)
is that what we're doing
cause i don't even understand how ln(x) is being involved here
that's my problem
you want it to look like y = (something involving lnx)
okay yeah
and you do this by using the change of base formula to write logx in terms of lnx
if i want to involve ln(x) then do i have to multiply it or plug it in to a variable or
what exactly
is there a reason you're not looking at the change of base formula?
i know what the formula is
can you show me how to apply it
to this question
maybe i'll understand then
if you know the formula, then make one of the bases 10, and one of the bases e
you should be able to then write logx in terms of lnx
yeah i don't really understand still
i told you ik the formula that's not the issue
i just genuinely don't understand how to apply it still lmao
what is the new base we want
base
yes base e
alright
plug in
yes
that is equal to logx
so you've written logx in terms of lnx
in particular, as (a constant)*lnx
alright i see
so you just wanna involve ln(x)
but then i don't understand
this already has the same base
but it's (1/x) instead of x
to make it the same you'd have to multiply it by *-1
so it becomes log(x)
but idk if that's right
try using some other log rules you know
well
actually
you are basically right
you are saying log(1/x) = -log(x) ?
yes
then yep just substitute that
oh
i was doing to say to use the quotient rule log(1/x) = log1 - logx, but it gives you the same
so it's just about finding what it's equal to
that's in the form of log(x)
alright last one then this would be
log(1) - 2log(x)
so it's -2log(x)?
indeed!
no worries, well done
Closed by @serene falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the quaratic rule that relates the number of balls to the term number (n) in the following pattern. If 66 balls are in the pattern, what tern number is it?
the pattern goes:
N = 1, balls = 1
N = 2, Balls = 3
N = 3, Balls = 6
N = 4, Balls = 10
I see a pattern
but idk how to write it
as a quadratic
Pattern I see:
For instance
N = 2
and balls = 1
for N =1
if you add them
N = 2
balls = 3
another is
Balls = 3
In N =2
and N = 3
3 + 3 = 6
N = 3 = 6 balls
but i cannot graph this
someone help pls
can you find a quadratic given three points on the graph?
Should I graph this 1st?
uhh
N = 2
N = 1 has 1 ball
and 1 + 1 = 2
(1 as in N = 1 and the other 1 is the balls in n = 1)
but that doesnt work for the others
Pls help
hello
say you have a quadratic f(x)=ax^2+bx+c and you know that f(1)=1, f(2)=3 and f(3)=6
do you know how to get the coefficients a,b and c from that information?
good. that's exactly what the question is asking
how do you do it for all 3
at the same time
hm
ok then maybe they don't want you to solve it like that
yes
can u walk me thru it
please
yes and you want to know the total amount of balls
what if I add more balls like this
that was what i was thinking
not n^2 but close
what are the sidelengths of the rectangle
yes
oh damn
so n and n+1
so how many total balls are there
in n = 13?
in general
yes
yessir!
in general?
yes
half of that
yes
yes
is that it
well now we know the formula
yes
f(n)=(n^2+n)/2
I mean
no
there are 66 balls
are you asking you for f(66) or f(n)=66
ok
brackets
132 = n^2 + n
on second thought this would be easier to just continue the pattern by hand tho
cause 66 is still pretty small
is this right
n^2+n-132=0 but yes
yesssss
what factors of -132
add to 1
hmm
I got a website for that
cuz im too lazy
-11 and 12
the answer would be 12
I mean 11
x - 11 = 0
x + 12 = 0
thank you for this great explanation
the visual representation of the equation really helps
yes. visual representations are often very helpful
yea
always try drawing some stuff
usually people in this server over complicate some things
especially with explanations
even if it doesn't help, drawing it doesnt hurt
do you mean the advanced role I have?
yes
that's self assigned to be able to see certain channels on here
doesn't really mean anything
but drawing some stuff when in doubt is definitely one of the tricks in my toolbox
always helps to try to visually represent some things
can u
tell me
all the tricks
in ur toolbox
Closed by @quartz quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
but with more practice etc you'll see some tricks for certain types of problems
that often help
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I approach this problem
I tried using cosine law to set the x's to each other but I got a long equation that got me more confused
is there a more elegant solution
Closed by @full adder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with these 3 questions?
Starting with 11
Looking for the length of the segment QR
QR and GF are congruent correct?
do you know what it means for 2 triangles to be congruent?
yes, but side length wise
Equal
12
14**
lmao i read the letters wrong
Oh
yeah its 14
note thr fact that the order of the letters in the triangle congruence is very important
Pr= 14 tho
$\triangle PQR \cong \triangle EFG \Longleftrightarrow PQ \equiv EF, QR \equiv FG, PR \equiv EG$
$\triangle PQR \cong \triangle EFG \Longleftrightarrow PQ \equiv EF, QR \equiv FG, PR \equiv EG$
Kel.plush
along with the angle congruences
pr is 12
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
A hour has passed
Qr= gf
Pq= eg
Pr=ef
Pq and eg =12
Pr and ef= 14
Now I'm stuck
Almost 2 hours done passed
ima just pick another one
.close
Closed by @latent venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.closed
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can i simplify this boolean algebra expression?
(x & y & z) | (x & !y & !z) only using AND, OR, NOT
.close
Closed by @wooden oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello could someone let me know if I am right to think that acceleration is 0 in i and ii
I think so but I wanna double check to avoid 20 minutes of confusion if its not
What's your force diagram with its components
I would let the slope be the x axis and the normal force's direction be the y axis
I just need to know the acceleration
if its 0 or not
Just needed a yes or a no
nevermind i got it
.close
Closed by @novel fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@fast peak sorry, just one more thing, what if i want the image of an almost null sequence to be 0
may i get some context on this
what is an almost null sequence supposed to be?
yes sry.. so i need an example of group homomorphism that goes from the group of sequences with + to Z,+
real sequences?
so integer sequences
sequence with a finite number of terms
yes
other than null
can you maybe show the entire problem exactly as stated
its in french
i speak french
sure does
ah lol
problem 2 asks to show that if a homomorphism from Z^N to Z is almost null then it is the zero map
Closed by @cunning atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
any idea for teh first one
i have the sol but i want to see what your first intuition would be
i mean since its linear i could decompose the seq and id have an infinite sum of almost null sequences no?
so phi is an almost-null morphism and we want to show that any sequence of the form p^n a_n gets sent by it to 0, for a_n an integer sequence
yeah
hm
is there something wrong with this logic, its my first line of thought
p prime
talking about infinite sums in this context seems fishy
an infinite sum of 0 tho
tho i didnt use any hypothesis from the question so ofc its false
dont forget its prime
don't quite see how that helps us.
i still havent looked at the sol
so this is isnt valid
ouf
a homomorphism is almost null iff it has the following property: for any two sequences (a_n), (b_n) that differ in only finitely many terms, phi((a_n)) = phi((b_n))
and if a sequence is divisible by m ∈ Z (meaning all of its terms are divisible by m) then its image under any homomorphism also ought to be divisible by m
and the sequence p^n a_n is "finitely many terms away from" a sequence divisible by p, and one that's divisible by p^2, and one that's divisible by p^3, and so on.
the intersection of the sets pZ, p^2 Z, p^3 Z, ... is {0}
the infinite intersection?
but i still fail to understand why my reasoning wasnt valid
this one
well you have an infinite sum
and want to use linearity on that
but linearity only works for finite sums
@cunning atlas Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cunning atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there a faster way to workout what x is
instead of substituting numbers till its right?
in the first step, minus 42 from both side
so that you can factor
and find the roots
you can do it with delta after
There are two different ways that you could try substracting 42 in both sides and you could factor it
And the second way is
Use the quadratic formula and take out the values for x and sift the value where cx=0 ( where c is a constant) cause there will be 2 value of x you will get the answer
Wolfram alpha it's a website
When you are using quadratic just sift the RHS values to LHS is x is at LHS and Keep RHS = 0 by this you will get two values
Here it will be (x+9)(x-4)
Yes
5x-36??
is that not right
Where did the x² goes?
ill show you what i did
No you have written it wrong
Oh ok
Yeah but process?
You have to factor it by mid term
Using mid term*
You know how to factor quadratic polynomial?
nope my class have just started learning this
you have to use middle term factorisation
x^2-4x+9x-36
x(x-4)+9(x-4)
(x+9)(x-4)
Like is its
x²+5x-36
Then it will be
x²-4x+9x-36
Factorisation of Quadratic Polynomials.
To learn more about Quant- Algebra, enroll in our full course now: https://infinitylearn.com/microcourses?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=Soical&utm_campaign=DM&utm_content=nJrEUZkDNpI&utm_term={keyword}
In this video, we will learn:
0:00 quadratic polynomial
0:14 factorization of a quadratic polynom...
Watch this
-9 & +4
x=-9
And x=4
It's not possible
it has 2 values but it must be saying only 1
(x+9)(x-4)=0 then check by putting the values
Yes
but x could be one value if u do it this way
If you put x=4 you will get 0 if you put x=-9 then you will get 0 that's my both are correct
That's why x=-9 is true
would -9 not work for this question
Cause a side you could not be = any negative
In geometrical figure
-9 is correct in the algebraic way
But in rectangle
You could see that
If you put
x=-9
Then one side will be -6cm and other will be -7 cm
ohhhhhhhhhhh my bad
And side couldn't be negative
sides cant be negative
That's why only 4 is correct only in this question
Welcome
.close
Closed by @inner solstice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somone care to explain how this works because i really dont get it
since it is square we have to multiply it 2 times
(x+y)(x+y)
now multiply x iwth the 2 nd equation and also mulyiply y with the 2nd equation and add em up
x(x+y) + y(x+y)
x^2+xy+yx+y^2
x^2+2xy+y^2
♡LexQa♡
Oh yeah what they wrote basically
Closed by @ocean plinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please help me with these Geometry questions
I want to know how to do these
the two angles of the base of an isoceles triangle/trapezoid are equal
so (BA,BC)=(CB,CD)
or 7x+16 = -(x² + x)
Closed by @cedar moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What method do I use to for this expression
10^102+10^100
10^100
take apart the fraction
How would I go about doing it
(a+b)/c = a/c + b/c
you're going to notice something immediately once you do that
Alright Ill write it down
What's your question?
(100¹⁰²+100¹⁰⁰)/100¹⁰⁰
better to send a pic if you don't know how to type your thing properly
Bots broken so had to improvise
100¹⁰²/100¹⁰⁰+100¹⁰⁰/100¹⁰⁰
the bases are 10, not 100.
you could at least not actively distort the question
Arnab Pal
Yes that's why I was editing it
Yea I got to this point
10²+1
Indeed
101
Yes welcome 🫂
.close
Closed by @willow fiber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I tried the first one
I cant find a good video for the M thingie
My textbook has 1 example which doesnt even cover this
M2,2 are "2x2 matricies"
The M thingy?
Lol my bad
T takes matricies and produces real numbers
You've written down that you want to compute T(u) and T(cu) but I don't see that computation anywhere on the page
you would just put it into the form a - b - c - d right?
T(a b) = a - b - c - d
(c d)
wait one sec
The left is cT(u) and the right it T(cu)
I think
I hate this class
I really like that second last line
I'm realizing now we're using c to mean two different things whoops lol
yeah i tried making one bigger to show it's different
so i cant rewrite the stuff inside the bracket on the left to T?
I think you get how this works, let's make it concrete. I'll use m as the scalar.
Let's compute mT(u):
= m(a - b - c - d)
= ma - mb - mc - md
Let's compute T(mu):
= T(ma mb)
(mc md)
= ma - mb - mc - md
Whoa, they simplify to the same thing. So, mT(u) = T(mu)
okay that makes sense ty
And that's half the work done. The other half is T(u + v) and T(u) + T(v) which is done the same way
Also the same. Note this T is a function that takes a matrix as input, and produces a matrix as output
would i be like u + v = that matrix?
So for example, let's compute:
T(0 0 0)
(0 0 0)
(3 0 0)
= (0 0 1) (0 0 0)
(0 1 0) (0 0 0)
(1 0 0) (3 0 0)
= (3 0 0)
(0 0 0)
(0 0 0)
ah okay that makes sense
T acts on your matrix by multiplying it by another matrix
Matrix algebra is always linear!
No need to check the axioms for this, which I think would be very difficult haha
Closed by @dire flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i work out e if 0.5e^4 = e^12
some variable
Okay multiply both sides by 2 first
e^4 = 2e^12
Take the right term to the left
e^-8 = 2?
Nah just
[
e^4 = 2e^12
]
[
e^4 - 2e^12 = 0
]
oh
$h$
God dammit this bot breaks every day
Sigh
Anyways from e^4 -2e^12 = 0 factor out e^4
e^4(1-2e^3) = 0
e^8
so e^4(1-2e^8) = 0?
ok
First one is just when e = 0, what's the second
e^8 = 0.5 but im not sure how to get rid of the ^8
Take the 8th square root of both sides
0.917
and 0
±
Closed by @narrow rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
±0.917 and 0 ig
Aighty
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, can someone help w this?
Can you relate $f(x)$ being increasing to a statement about $f'(x)$?
chartbit
it increases when f'(x) is positive
Yea, so try and find where that is...?
@wild fable Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wild fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you guys know by any chance how one could start with this ?
What is the question you need help with? Please provide more details so that we can better assist you.
Substitution u = sqrt(x)
integrating it
ah
ill try that brb
@warm abyss
do both sqrt x become u ?
or only one is chosen?
yeah both
ok
youre changing the variable to differentiate on from x to u, which changes it everywhere in the integral
Closed by @signal quiver
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
The sqrt(x) in the numerator becomes u. The one in the denominator disappears because du/dx = 1/(2sqrt x)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do they go from 2nd to 3rd line
The third line of the equation is derived from the second line through algebraic manipulation. To go from the second line to the third line, you need to divide each side of the equation by the coefficient of x, which is -3 in this case. After doing this, you should be left with the third line of the equation.
the coefficient of x is -3?
how so
isnt it npi/2 or n/2
what
the n are integer multiples
this is fourier series
here was the question for more context
i see it now
.close
Closed by @heavy geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey math people
The question, the teacher's answer, and then my answer
I know the first term in my answer is functionally equivalent to the first term in his answer
But I'm not sure what's going on with the second term
Derp
Are you a robot, Churnos? Or are you a human?
I think the details of my question are pretty apparent, though implicit
very suspicious
baby don't hurt me
Closed by @glass trench
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Hi there! How can I help you? @gritty rose
I'm not sure what you mean by that.
It's definitely a tough one!
true or false: This sentence is false.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @limber flicker
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
so some basic math here I think
so after a raise which was 750$
a worker is now getting paid 2282$
let him finish
typing the question

shahahahah
okay if you're gonna be a bot/pretend to be a bot, atleast dont straight up give out answers

is it still correct ?
did you even read what sigma said?
lol, yeah and deffo dont give out wrong answers
you're right nick you need to find out the original money
what did he say
you know they added 750 to the original and they got 2282
you can figure out the original
but I got it just 2282 minus 750
yeah
so you just want the percentage that 750 is of the original
Churnos go and do bot stuff somewhere other than the help channels
damn why yall doin bro like that💀
<@&268886789983436800> can you rid the bot please
our lord and pointed corner saviour
@pale shadow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
knowing how to correctly solve these two questions (Factorization) would help out
What’s (x-3)^2
Look at ur first problem
yup
What’s the first term
(x-3)(x-3) i think
your asking me to expand it?
Yea (x-3)(x-3)
well no point of trying to solve it now
K
I mean there is 2nd prob
Why are u continuing with the problem?
are you not supposed to
And that has alrdy been provided
It asks u to find errors
We found the error alrdy
no no no theres a box below the question asking you to solve it
without the mistakes the student made
@gritty hare Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gritty hare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I got the meaning of the Bolzano theorem then
If f continue in [a,b], c€[a,b] <=> f(c)€[f(a), f(b)]
Right?
Yes, that is a correct statement of the Bolzano theorem.
Closed by @glad prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My math teacher was not very helpful when I requested extra help, and am still very confused 😭
You have to use opposite angle theorem to fill in all the other angles and then use that a circle of angles adds up to 360
Alright!
So CFG is 3x by opposite or opposing angle theorem
Not sure exactly what it's called
How exactly would that be written down?
Statement: angleCFG is 3x
reason: opposing angle theorem with ACB
Btw
Which angle are you trying to find I might have messed up
Cuz actually angleFCG is 3x
Using proper notation
The angle opposite the 3 x angle
CFG is the angle in the lower left corner of the triangle
Yeah
So now we use parallel line stuff to says that CFG is 2x
I again don't remember the theorem
But basically you have a line connecting parallel lines then the opposite interior angles are equal
Ok
FGC is 7x by the same theorem
Well because DE and FG are parallel that angle is 2x both there and down at the bottom
Well it's 2 x there for sure
Anyways once you have all the angles in terms of x you just set them equal to 180° and remember that what you are looking for is 2x
If you have your text book you should be able to find the theorem I'm talking about and use it to justify
@astral yew Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do I check the regions around the vertical asymptotes aswell?
for where its concave up
?
@atomic vortex Has your question been resolved?
have you taken the second derivative?
@atomic vortex Has your question been resolved?
yep
Thats how I got the inflection point
Closed by @atomic vortex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when they find out -1/2 is a zero
how do they get 2x+1 from that
wouldnt it be (x+0.5)
Yes, but that's the same as (1/2)(2x + 1), and we don't care about lingering constants