#help-28
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
Would it be a good idea to first write a basis for the kernel and of the pre-image?
it would be a good start to find all the information you can get about F from its kernel
and the 2 given values
Ok, I'll review my notes and see what I can come up with, hold on
You should be able to find the images of each basis vector of R^5 directly. I found them in the order ||2->5->1->3->4||
Ok, I got a lead, I should probably reverse engineer the linear system given to me, to find the matrix associated with F
Although in this case the matrix that I'll find through Ker(F) it's gonna be a Gaussian reduced matrix, can I still consider it associated with F?
The standard Basis of R^5 should be B = { 10000, 01000, 00100, 00010, 00001} yeah?
But how do I find the images, I don't have F yet
the kernel gives you information
Oh ok, then back to work
you can write F(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) = x1P1 + x2P2 + x3P3 + x4P4 + x5P5 where the P_i are polynomials
the kernel gives you info on the P_i
I thought you had some advanced mindblowing Algebra theorem to find them just with a look
with the 2 values given, you have just enough to find F
@noble pelican Has your question been resolved?
I'm missing something, a connection
I tried reverse engineering the matrix, and found the T(b1), T(b2) .... T(b5) but they do not look right
(Image 1)
So then I went and found the space of the soution of Sol(Ker(F), 0) but I have no idea what to do with that information:
Sol(KerF, 0) = [ a(1, 0, -1, 1, 1, 0) + b(0, 1, 0, 0, 0) + c(0, 0, 0, 0, 1)]
have you find F before trying to find its matrix ?
because you don't need to think of it as a matrix to find it here. Arguably the abstraction can even make it harder
ok lemme check
I don't think P5 = 0
notice that P1 = -P5
similarly P3 = -P4
that's how you find all the polynomials: you use this to simplify the 2 given values
but yes, P2 = 0
I wrote it wrong
I wrote x1 + x3 = 0 instead of x1 + x5 = 0*
I didn't look at the matrix actually
I just looked at the polynomials you wrote below
Let me try again with this new values
Hints that T(b2) = 0 keeps appearing in my calculations, but I do not understand why its implied
don't know how you can end up with some t² and t^3 if you're only combining linear functions
I don't see it, which means that T( 0, 1, 0, 0, 0) != 0?
it verifies both equalities
therefore P2 = 0
since there is no constraint on x2, it means that x2 always verifies the constraints, so if x1, x3, x4, x5 do as well, then it's in the kernel. Therefore F(0, 1, 0, 0, 0) = 0
Okay, let's back up, I need to review the basics here, first of all:
- x = (x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) is a vector of COOORDINATES of the vector v that belongs to V
- Ax = 0 has solutions Sol(A, 0) which are a bunch of vector of Coordinates, they do not make the basis of Ker(F) yet.
- Through the use of the basis of V + Sol(A,0) (vector of coordinates) we can find the vectors to form basis of KerF.
Is what I stated right?
- x is vector of R^5, not a polynomial
- Fx = 0 is equivalent to x in ker F, that's more than the basis
- don't know what you mean
In linear Algebra, when we talk about the ker(F), don't we get it's System of linear equations through a matrix?
Ker F is a vector space. You describe it however you want
it can be through a system of equations, like what they've done here
okay isn't the next step to solve that system of linear equations?
that's not the goal here
Okay, I know you already told them to me, but can you explain me how did you solve this exercise, step by step, with a logic explanation behind each one?
I really wanna understand your point of view but it feels like I was taught one way to do stuff that's useless in this context, although related.
is it fine to take P2 = 0 as a starting point or do I need to reexplain that ?
Let me see if I understood correctly, in the System of linear equations (SLE) only x1, x3, x4 and x5 are involved, they describe kerF(?), and since there is no x2, it has no constraints(?) which in turns means it verifies this constrains( I don't understand what are the constraints in these context)
So P2 = 0
(?)
(0, 1, 0, 0, 0) verifies the equations that describe Ker F right ?
alright, so P2 = 0
Yes
then we had F(0, 1, 0, 0, 1) = 1 + t + t²
Can you find P5 from that ?
A clarification, with P2 you mean T(01000)?
I'm still sticking to that
Yeah just subtract T(01000) from it which leaves it with the same value
yes
so P5 = 1 + t + t²
but we had P1 = P5 didn't we ?
because F(1, 0, 0, 0, -1) = 0
that means P1 - P5 = 0
so P1 = P5
right ?
Uhm
I didn't actually do the computations so I guessed wrong
mental math is not as reliable as written math
I agree with that thought
so is that good ?
because here x1 + x5 = 0 so we're in the kernel
x1 + x5 you mean.
yes
Sorry if I' a bit slow to catch on but these are all new logic steps to me
But I understand
P1 = P5
👌
then you need some practice. Can you use some similar reasoning to find P3 and P4 ?
Yeah, I'll try thanks
how is it going ?
yes
it took me a few minutes to remember they gave those two images.
Also I rewrote every step to find P2, P5 and P1
Okay, I'll go ahead and write F (I think I can do that right?)
I sure hope you can add a few polynomials
It's a bit long though:
F(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) =
x1+x5-x3-x4 + (x1+x5+x3+x4)t +(x1+x5-x3-x4)t^2 - (x3+ x4)t^3
agreed. With that you should be able to find the matrix that represents F
Question, do you know what the linear extension principle is?
I can take a guess, but I know nothing of that name
is it that a linear application is uniquely determined by the image of a basis of the input space ?
It allowed the professor's solution to unite both the vectors that form the basis of Ker(F) (found through the SLE) and the vectors the he has gives us to find a basis of R^5, and basically helped him find every Pi.
By just combining these vectors
He also used it as a reason to prove that this linear map was unique (which was a request of the exercise).
Nvm then, thank you a lot for your help!
I find your solution cleaner btw
sounds like completing a basis
where you have Ker F = Span({(1, 0, 0, 0, -1), (0, 1, 0, 0, 0), (0, 0, 1, -1, 0)}) and you add 2 vectors to get a basis that's fitted to F
and then rewrite it to get it in terms of the standard basis
how do you rewrite it?
some expand then factor similar to this
I suppose
no
you find the linear combination that gives each basis vector and find its image by F
that's how I'd do it
which feels like a rather long and tedious process
You mean you can add ANY two vectors and it will still form a basis of F?
Aren't there any rules or restrictions to this, seems a bit OP.
of course not
2 vectors that make a free family
so you have a free family of 5 vectors for a 5D vector space, so it's a basis
What's a free family?
synonym to linearly independent
Oh ok, so I guess he somehow verified that together they were linearly independent
probably
Well then I think that will be all for today, thank you for your time and efforts, if you ever come to Italy, I'd like to offer you a pizza and Coca-Cola 🙂
questions 2 and 3 are fine ?
actually, the reason he did that was because it directly answers Q2
oh yeah
but wait, first he needs to prove that those two vectors alone are a subvector space U
Actually no
But I thought that keeping you here for 2 hours was enough
depression
I was more interested by Q3 actually
the more interesting stuff is the more complicated questions
Okay then give me 10 min. and I'll be back, I need to process this last 2h30min
I can relate but on a different context
actually I'll be back in 20 min
brb, probably > 30min
@noble pelican Has your question been resolved?
still here ?
yeah
They are linearly independent
But I can't find a feasible way to prove they form a subvector space of R^5
that's regular vector space theory
for any S subset of V, span(S) is a subspace of V
also since it's a linearly independent family of 5 vectors in a 5D vector space, it is a basis
Yes S has to be a subset, but it also needs to respect the conditions for it to be a vector space, i.e. we have to verify that any linear combination of its element has to stay in S
that's what the span operator is for
guess what
the professor never explained us what a span operator is, I can guess that it represents the linear combinations of the vectors involved in the span operation
given a subset S of V, span(S) is
the smallest subspace of V that contains S
the set of all linear combinations of elements in S
$Span(S) = {\sum_{s \in S} a_s s \setminus (a_s)_{s \in S} \in \mathbb{R}^{(S)}}$
themateo713
i.e. all finite linear combinations of elements of S
So to explain to my prof. that the subset of {v1, v2} is a subvector space I just have to tell him Span(v1, v2)?
I don't think that's gonna fly, on what basis I can confidently say that U it's a vector space, therefore a subvector space?
Span( (0,1,0,0,1) (0,0,1,0,1) ) by definition is a vector space then
U = {(0,1,0,0,1)(0,0,1,0,1)}
Span(U) is a vector space
But U isn't or at least I haven't proven it yet
Oh no, don't tell me the answer is just writing out:
The subspace vector is Span((0,1,0,0,1)(0,0,1,0,1))
that's a way of writing it
it depends on how you want to express it
that's why a lot of math questions are "prove this" rather than "find that" because they want you to figure out how to write it a certain way
It feels like cheating, then again in the solutions the professor never stated why those two vectors form a basis
they don't
it's the 2 vectors + a basis a Ker F. That makes a basis
if the 2 vectors are chosen correctly
A subspace vector U found is the one that has as basis (0,1,0,0,1)(0,0,1,0,1)
its what he wrote
as a supplementary to Ker F ?
gl with that handwriting lol
doesn't state it
sottospazio ?
No kidding, he mastered the writing of a doctor
His notes are incomprehensible
subspace / subvectorspace
is that his entire answer ?
yes 😦
all of his answer are disjointed and minimal (As stated in my original call for help, I mean question)
Yep, and why
if you want we can move to the next question sigh
btw here it's that you know they're not in Ker F because you're given their image. And it's quite obvious that they're linearly independent
then it should be linearly independent with the kernel's basis. I think that might be provable in the general case, but I don't want to say something I can't give a proof for
yep, not in KerF, checks out
think that's true
If they were linearly dependent, then you could express 1 as a function of the others. Applying F to that, we find that their images are linearly dependent, which is wrong
They are linearly independent, if you solve the System of Linear Equation associated with those 5 vectors that form the basis of R^5 (set to 0), you'll get only the solution (0, 0, 0, 0, 0) for their xis.
actually it's only wrong in this case
but I think it should be true
Which means that the only way for you to have a linear combination of those elements to result in 0, is if all of their factors are 0 ( the definition of linear independence of vectors )
So anway
Question 3)
Find a basis for V/Im(F)
I just realized that I'm familiar with quotient groups but not quotient VS lol
that's what I thought though
If F + G = E is a direct sum, then E/F ~ G
which is very nice
the question is equivalent to finding a supplementary to Im F and finding a basis for it
not sure what you mean
if you find G then it's much easier
not sure that's the simplest way though
Im F = {a+(a-2b)t + at² - bt^3 \ a, b in R}
what's G?
for any vectors spaces E, F, G with F and G subspaces of E
oh okay
if P1 = ax^3 + bx² + cx + d and P2 = ex^3 + fx² + gx + h are equivalent, then
a-e = -v, b-f = u, c-g = u-2v, h-d = u for some u and v
Good luck with that, whichever way you want to do it !
For now I'm going to eat lol
don't worry about it!
Thanks for all the help
Though it's a bit discouraging how much I studied(3+ months) vs. how much I apparently lack
But I'll keep pushing through, like I've been doing all this time
have a nice lunch/dinner?
my parents are fed up with me because I can't pass this damn exam...
I don't know what to tell them anymore 😦
oh well
.close
Closed by @noble pelican
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For this problem, when I did usub I changed the bounds but I think the answer key doesn’t. Why is that?
In what cases do you not have to change bounds
Is it since u just sub sinx back layer
Later *
,rotate
if you're using u-sub for definite integrals, ideally you'd update bounds as you go
(although technically not necessary if you have the proper notation)
Wdym not necessary with proper notation
well after changing your variable, the bounds are implied to be for that variable unless stated otherwise
after changing variable to u, [1,0]
the whole idea of update the bounds as you go is that you don't have to sub back your sin(x) at all
ah
that should be a u btw
tyty
if you wanted to keep them as 0 and $\frac{\pi}{2}$ you'd need to explicitly write something like
$$\int_{x=0}^{x=\frac{\pi}{2}} \dots$$
oh i could also just sub sinx in and then keep the bounds, orrevt?
ℝamonov
correct*
if you explicitly indicate the bounds like above
you can if you really want but
its a bit inefficient (many go this route and do it improperly from just finishing indefinite integrals)
there have been cases where the bounds temporarily disappear completely only to come back later which is also bad
@delicate gust Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would I just substitute the values of x in to solve to get the slope?
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
You have another channel open, close that channel
Rather close that one. The other one was never gotten to
@stiff wagon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you do this?
I4x-1I = 2x
@misty raft Has your question been resolved?
@misty raft Has your question been resolved?
fuck
Closed by @misty raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You still need help?
Closed by @languid stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@languid stone nah
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i solve a system like this, I tried everything i could think of.
@tawny sierra Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@tawny sierra Has your question been resolved?
Assuming you want integer solutions, I’ll give a few hints.
- ||(a+b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2||
- ||Consider the expansion of (a+b+c)^2||
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
These are both the same problems but I have no clue which one is correct. I’ve been doing this for like a full day haha
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185> I am still unsure
looks good to me
wait
yeah
Which one looks good? haha
both are the same problem but idk which one is correct
I feel like the bottom one is since I did the log rule of xtan(x) and took it apart.
it is the same thing either way
since you can divide everything by 2xtan(x) in the first one and get the same answer as the second
ohh!
my god. thank you so much
you don’t understand how frustrated i was. i felt like it could be the same but didn’t even think about dividing the tan
thank you
no problem ❤️
what I am unsure about is the dy/dx part since it seems like you already took the derivative of ln(y)
So I think that should disappear
hmm
well I was supposed to solve using logarithmic differentiation
and in all the example problems the 1/y was just cancelled out and then the dy/dx was kept
It might be something I forgot about gimme a sec
sure !
nevermind you did it right
In calculus, logarithmic differentiation or differentiation by taking logarithms is a method used to differentiate functions by employing the logarithmic derivative of a function f,
(
ln
f
)
′
=
f
...
Good job
yayaya
thank you sm 💜
.close
Closed by @cyan crystal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
pls help
<@&286206848099549185> pls help
Could you guys help me to tell how can I simply it further?
@strange stag Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the distance from the point A(-2,3) to the line y=1/2x+1. Round your answer to the nearest tenth.
the answers 2.3 units however i don't know how they got that
when my teacher went over it it was like a different answer
like an ordered pair
Hi
hey
I think your teacher identified the point on the line which you use along with the first to then find the distance between
what kind of answers can you use to answer that one specific question
i always see numbers with square roots but i never saw him go over that
and im hella confused
Ok, lets think about how to answer this sort of question from scratch
To there are several ways this can be done, but thinking about the most intuitive
Ok
So they are always using a line perpendicular to the one you are given
Do you know why
so theres an intersection point?
Well even if we use a non perpendicular line, provided it is not parallel, there will always be an intersection
well idk
With these questions, it is implied that we are looking for the shortest distance
Other non perpendicular lines still represent straight paths to the line given, but that path will be longer
huh so why are they always using a line perpendicular
Bc that line represents the path to the line given which is shortest
Imagine you are walking to a road
You want to get there with as little walking as possible
Will you walk straight towards the road or at some diagaonal
straight
so would the line
go straight
wait
so it would
intersect the other point
which point would it intersect
Your walking path will always have the red point as that is where you are starting from
But we need to choose the gradient which will minimize the distance
So we can either use some general point on the blue line find the distance to it, then use differentiation to minimize that distance, or we can think geometrically and say that the perpendicular line will have the smallest distance and get that number directly
Since the first way is really used to prove that the perpendicular line gives the shortest distance, we can just use that fact and do the second way
Is that all ok?
how would u solve it
its just all this explaining kinda hurts my head
especially in school
yes
\
Along with the red point and blue line above you had
So have all three in the same graph
Nice
Now move m around
See how the distance from the black point to the red line changes (the green line is the path)
kinda
Ok there is a formula
The gradients of two perpendicular lines m1 and m2 satisfy the equation
whats a gradient
,,m_1 m_2=-1
Social Capital Gainer
The slope of the line
ok
Yes, we wanna chose a specific value for m in the above graph
theres y=-x+3 and y=x-1
Yes
See how in the first line in red text it says the productof the slopes of perpendicular lines is -1
That's what we are about to do
ok so y=1/2x+1
m=1/2
3=2(1/2)+b
4=b
y=1/2x+4?
But using this formula
So set m1 to 1/2 and solve for m2
how do i solve for m2
So did you put 1/2 into m1
Yes, well done
That's the gradient of the perpendicular line
Put -2 as m in your desmos graph fpr the green line
There it is
See how the distance from the black dot to the red line is thr shortest it can be with this gradient
Ypu don't estimate
ok
Find the point of intersection with those lines
how am i supposed to
You mean this equation?
yea
So what I did there was
Using the form of the straight line through a point (a,b):
,,y-b=m(x-a)
Social Capital Gainer
Have you seen a straight line written like that before
no
Social Capital Gainer
Perhaps with different letters
ye
its where u start on the graph
Yeah
Now in this line, we can make it look like the one you have seen, but it will be more useful to us to use this one then make it look like yours
So to use this
The straight line passing through the point (a,b) with slope m has the equation
,,y-b=m(x-a)
Social Capital Gainer
So in our case, the point it passes through is (-2,3)
And the slope is -2
So can you put those numbers in for me
a is -2, b is 3 and m is -2
y-3=-2(x-2)
but wouldny x or y be -2 or -3
Well x and y are the variables, but (a,b) is a point which the line definitely passes through
This means that x and y will be -2 and 3 at some point, but the equation still works because it gives 0=0 and that is true
3-3=-2(-2+2)
0=0
Basically, an ordered pair (x,y) is on the line if we can put x and y into the equation and the equation is true
So for example
If you put (0,-1) into the equation
-1-3=-2(0+2)
-4=-4
Since the left side is the same as the right side, the equation works
But if we try (1,1)
1-3=-2(1+2)
-2=-6
This is wrong
So (1,1) is not on the line
But (0,-1) is on the line
For the same reason (-2,3) is on the line
Is that ok?
this hurts my brain
Oh, ok, all you need to know is that you can make this line as you did above, you don't need to know why it works
,,y-3=-2(x+2)
Social Capital Gainer
what do you do after?
So now lets make it look like the line yoi are familiar with
So add 3 to both sides
,,y=-2(x+2)+3
Social Capital Gainer
Social Capital Gainer
So what is the equation of the line?
y=-2x-1
Yeah, well done
I can explain why point slope works if u want
what
We already passed that
Your equation was in point slope and u made it into slope intercept
Anyway
Now we have two equations
y=1/2x+1
And the one you just rearranged
y=-2x-1
So we set y=y
And find x
So we do
y=y
1/2x+1=-2x-1
Can you find x for me by solving this?
2 1/2x=-2
Yep and then
uhh
Turn your mixed number into a top heavy fraction
Social Capital Gainer
wha
Well 2.5 is 5/2 right
ye but u have it on the other sidew
oh wait
ok
what do u do if u wanna put it into -2
x=-4/5
Yeah
So that is the x coordinate of the point of intersection
Now to get the y coordinate
Choose either of the two straight lines, doesn't matter which
Maybe y=-2x-1
As the slope is not a fraction, but it doesn't matter
uhh
And put x into it
y=-2x-1
The x you just found
Yeah, it will be easier if you work with top heavy fractions. Mixed numbers like you are using are not often useful in these contexts
But actually you can carry on from here pretty easily
alr
3/5
Yeah
Specifically y=3/5
So that is the y coordinate
Now we have the point of intersection
(-4/5 , 3/5)
Now just find the distance from (-2,3) to that point
Using the distance formula, or however you like to do it
By the way, this ordered pair is probably what your prof found
And stopped there
So how would you find that distance
distance formula
Oke
Closed by @halcyon wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
No problem at all
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to find the nth term of this geometric sequence, but the common ratio isn't constant
you can't simplify a factorial
could you elborate
From the pattern I'm noticing, wouldnt you increase the number you multiply the previous answer by by one each time? 1x2=2, 2x3=6, 6x4=24, 24x5=120, etc
yeah that's the pattern i see
yeah but like geometric sequences have a common ration that is constant
you can;t do anything instead of doing the multiplication
im not sure how to solve one that isnt constant
is there any formula for a geometric equation that doesant have a constant common ratio???????????
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
well then it's not a geometric sequence anymore
every sequence has a nonconstant ratio
if there really was a simple trick like this we could easily solve every sequence. sadly we can't
sorry im so dumb
this is actually a factorial sequence
not a geometric one
i was confused because i just dont remember this stuf
thanks for the help everyone
.close
Closed by @thorny violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is my work right? (so far)
u = cosx btw
it ends up as irrational stuff so I’m not sure
sorry for the bad handwriting btw lol
looks fine
one mistake
first line
you put everything on the left-hand side right
it should be -1 instead of 1
ye
so at the end equation should have -3 not -5
yup
$4u^2 -2u -3$
kjmkty
yes
@runic bloom Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
wait lemme read it lmao
oh whoops
so I fixed the -1 but this seems wrong.. can’t arccos those values
,w 4x^2 +2x -3=0
,calc -sqrt(13)/4 -(1/4)
Result:
-1.151387818866
,calc sqrt(13)/4 -(1/4)
Result:
0.651387818866
Check your calculations again
yeaa I messed up my calc lmao
okay so 0.65 is the only possible one right?
soo 0.86?
ty!
.close
Closed by @runic bloom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My task is to find x and y in the equation, using substitution:
the two equations:
3y + x = -2
y - x = 10
x can be found by:
x = -2 -3y
then i calculate y by:
y - 1(-2 -3y) = 10
y + 2 + 3y = 10
4y = 8
y = 2
and at last find x:
x = -2 -3(2)
x = -8
is this the correct way?
balls
idk i got -2 for x
on the first baby
😉
but i got snail scent so who knows
it might be all seeing
y + 2 + 3y = 10
4y = 12
incorrect manipulation in that step
Closed by @slender stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
== 2x^2 - 3x + 5 - ( 10/(x+3) )
so y = 2x^2 - 3x + 5 is an asymptote ;; right?
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
2x^2-3x+5 are not asymptotes
In fact that's not even the right terminology
Asymptotes are where a function will approach such as that the distance between the function and the asymptote will essentially become 0
I'm assuming you're trying to find the vertical asymptote
You've done the long division
But note the remainder: you can't cancel x+3 further
Set the denominator (of the remainder or leftover factors after division) equal to 0 to find your vertical asymptotes
how about horizontal asymptote
how would you find that?
A horizontal asymptote only exists if the leading term of both the numerator and the denominator are the same power
Are they the same power?
@torn jolt
bruh
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
wait I thought if it’s less than or equal it’ll exist?
pls I have an exam soon 😭
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
umbral is right, but sloped asymptotes exist if the top polynomial is one degree higher than the bottom
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got to K = (10-C)/4
I also got C=-4K+10
I think that I am supposed to use sys. of equations?
Graphing it gave me the points (2,2)
at x=0,y=-5
Inputting those values into the variables gives -5 = K+C
ok
I dont understand what to do with that equation
i mean this
Input it on the Original Y=k*2^x+c ?
no
this one
just place -5-k instead of C
2 variables , 2 equation
K=15 is what I ended up with.
plugging that into the C= equation gave
10 = 15*4+c
10=60+c
C=50```
That was the correct manor to do that equation in?
I suppose it is. Thank you guys.
.close
Closed by @wispy cove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does he find the LCD
how do i find the LCD here
3x2
6 is a multiple of 3
if it were not then the LCD would be 3* that number
Nice u r Muslim
i am yes
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @urban fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi! i have an assignment based on shapes that i need some help with... the assignment is to recreate an image of a sailboat and theres one particular line i dont know how to recreate - the first image is the assignment requirements and the second image is mine. i am unsure of how to create the line that makes the bottom of the sailboat - could anyone help me with that? thanks in advance!!!
To me it looks like a parabola, so you could start with a parabola in turning point form
And then sub in one of the end points to find the dilation
thank you so much
@modern bobcat Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @modern bobcat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not quite
how would you go about it
When you rationalize, you want to flip the sign separating the terms
So instead of $2 \sqrt{2} -1$, you need to use $2 \sqrt{2} + 1$
dldh06
That's what rationalizing is, nothing smart about it
Closed by @dreamy willow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Teach me how to do piecewise function please 🥺
YouTube can do this
Just look up videos on this
@candid zinc Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
oof im struggling with this trig identity stuff....how did they get cos^2theta = 1+cos2theta/2 ?
well it's just a well known identity
which one is it? half angle?
sure or double angle. essentially equivalent up to rearranging
yeah that one after squaring and rearranging a bit. or wikipedia also has a list of power reduction identities with this one
yeah tbh I just look them up on wikipedia all the time. good idea to know which ones exist tho
and well hopefully in an exam you can use a cheat sheet
we are allowed formuala sheets for the exams
im not sure about the quizzes though
they didnt say
i will ask and see
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @empty falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I find the inverse of the given function. The Ln is throwing me off
You can raise both sides to the power of e
.close
Closed by @tame tree
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would I go about x = 1 / y + 3
working with inverse functions in algebra
trying to solve for y?
right, but the steps, like whats first when dealing with a fraction
first bring the 3 to the other side
sorry, noob... how do i do that
yeah, x cant equal -3, right?
then what?
do you know what 1/(1/y) is?
no
its just y
good question, not sure if there is a good satisfying answer
do you know how 1/y = y^-1?
yeah
so if we do that, we get -1 * -1 in the exponent
oh another way to see it
you can multiply the numerator and denominator by y
1 / (1/y) = (y*1) / (y*(1/y))
1 / (1/y) = (y*1) / (y*(1/y))
= y/1 = y
sick! thanks bro! thats some deep math (for me at least)
well going back to the original problem
we had
x - 3 = 1/y
and then doing the 1/(...) trick we get
1/(x - 3) = y
btw another way would be to first multiply by y:
x - 3 = 1/y
(x - 3)*y = 1
and then divide x - 3
y = 1/(x-3)
yes depends on what you find more intuitive (it just requires more steps)
one more question if you have time
this isnt one to one because its a parabola right?
and to restrict the domain to make it one to ine, i'd just basically cut it in half?
does the question want you to have the domain only contain positive values or does it just have to contain positives?
i think it has to contain positive values
ofc [-9/2, infinity) would do the job
yes, at -9/2 there is the global minimum
so how to do you if its not (infinity, -9/2]?
what exactly?
like, we measure the domain from right to left always right?
i mean left to right
lol, i meant you do you know**
oh you mean how we notate intervals?
we always put the smaller number left and larger number right
ooohhh, ok
(-infinity, -9/2] would also have been a one to one domain
so find the global minimum and notate the rest of the graph (- or + infinity
right, that makes sense
well just look at the vertex form
the -9/2 is the x coordinate of the vertex
we can directly read it from x - -9/2
right. so from here, how do I find the inverse functon?
look at the vertex form and set it equal to y and solve for x
x^2 + 9x + 81/4?
its wrong, but after factoring, thats what i got
i had (x + 9/2)(x+9/2)
x^2 and 9/2 + 9/2 = 18 / 2 or 9
im not sure how you got there
lol me niether
you take the vertex form, set it equal = y
then add 81/4 both sides
take square root both sides
then subtract 9/2?
yes
ahem, subtract
oh right
also, strictly speaking you would need to put ±sqrt there
but, now think about what the domain for x is
what is parabola?
nvm i got it
@royal glade Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @royal glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ayon

y=2x-3, substitute into the 2 given eqn then find x and then y
Ok it’s just some simultaneous equations
ure here too HAHA
Just posting my questions every server i get
Dont mind me
HAHAH maximum efficiency
Which part are you stuck at
The whole thinf
a=4/3 x (lgx) /(r^2) where r is the common ratio
Substitute into formula for sum of geometric sequence to find r
It’s also simultaneous equation
Can you see they are simultaneous equations?
And can you see what formulas would relate them together
Closed by @slow gulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help explain this math problem and what i am not getting about it?
Send the original
What do you mean?
Oh ok srry i just joined this discord
That's fine
Hm okay
Rearrange the factors so that there are no negative powers
Combine like terms
can also first convert the 0 power to 1 and expand the rest,, then can simplify the terms
Again, get rid of negative powers
hihii
Closed by @stiff ermine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
HAHA the timing omg
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
r u his son fr
why chem question
I don't know what the OSO3H group is
isn’t this for maths HAHA
Closed by @slow gulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
oh okii thats gd
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is what my teacher wrote on the board but I don’t think I’ve ever learned what is or how to find LCD. I watched a few videos but couldn’t learn it. Can someone explain how he got 3x please
here is another example shared by my teacher
he was teaching Solving Rational Equations, but I dont understand this step of what is or how to find the LCD
or share a video if you have one
Lowest common denominator is the lowest number you can make the bottom number to make both fractions bottom number the same. In the example, your teacher saw that 6 is 2x3 therefore they could make the lcd 6. For your question, there is not rlly a way to only modify one fraction, you need to change them both to make the denominator the same. What could you multiply 3 by and what could you multiply x by to make them the same
Okay I get it now
What is the lcd?
Oh
Wait the teacher put 3x as lcd is that incorrect
Or multiply one by 3 and the other by x and the third by 3x
To get the common denominator of 3x
The common denominator is 3x, ignore the one after the equals sign for now
So for the first one would u only multiple the numerator by x since the bottom already has 3
Making it x^2 over 3x
Perfect
And the other one 27/3x
