#help-27
1 messages · Page 443 of 1
yes
sorry was scrolling back up to check lol ty
yes
or do I take a mock
sleep now, review everything early in the morning
you'd get the same amount of sleep regardless, but if you do a mock now you'll have a lower chance of remembering everything since you're sleeping in between
unless of course you dream of mock exams
Closed by @loud spade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
of course! good luck with your exam!

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone have potential ideas for how to solve the upper bound? I've been able to prove the lower bound using sudakov to bound E max Z, and then bounding the packing number using K_eff. For the upper bound I've tried dudley, but I'm not able to meaningfully bound the covering number in terms of K_eff, only K.
potentially the help channels aren't quite right for this? Maybe I should go to #advanced-probability ?
yea that's a good channel for your question
Closed by @devout haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
part c
this is my work
the last 3 values are where g(x) instrect the x axis
i got t= 2.83 to be correct
this the answer
what did i do wrong
How do you know g(2.83) is the greatest of the local maxima
its the biggest number
i found out the critical nmbers for g'(x)
then plugged into g(x)
Did you compare it to a = 6.203...
i checked on desmos
green is g(x)
black is g'(x)
the furthestmost point is 6.203
but thats on g(x)
so im confused
cuz i need to find wehre g'(x)=0
My guess is there's a mistake in the equation
F'(t) = E(t) - F(t) = 0
It should have been what you have
F'(t) = E(t) - L(t) = 0
so the answer key is wrong?
That's my guess yea
hol on
i see
the problem
e and l
are rates
so im wrong
i interepreted it wrong
.
I see. Maybe they just have the one typo with F' = E - F instead of F' = E - L but the rest of their work is correct
ye
wait
ive confused my self
can you like walk me through the problem
from part c
like the whole thing
i dont know what im doing anymore
Read the solution one line at a time until you get confused
@vast ledge Has your question been resolved?
i get it
im good now
.closer
.close
Closed by @vast ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Use ftc for each
You get similar answers which you can sub values in for the final integration, notice how for each section of the problem, we can rearrange and get a value for G(-10) and G(6)
Correct.
.close
Closed by @glass maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
No need for any weird substitution.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not sure how to to start this
,, let \vec{r} = x\hat{i} + y\hat{j} + z\hat{k}
Itsuki
after that just find r cross (2i-j+2k) using determinant method
I’m confused on what the actual question is asking sorry 😭
basically we need to find all (x,y,z) such that they are in the same plane as (2,-1,2) but at a fixed perpendicular direction and magnitude to the plane from (4,2,-3)
Ahh I see
Lemme try the question now
.close
Closed by @desert seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've done (b) which is Yes G is irrationational
but I want to know if this would be a good justification for (c)
as opposed to this solution here (where it's used the cofactor expansion)
Here's the problem
@civic crag Has your question been resolved?
@civic crag Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-27 message
Yes
So this solution makes sense would be better then?
The first version basically says:
“” and “” because the matrix becomes block diagonal / extends nicely.
That is correct, but it skips the justification a bit fast.
The second version explicitly explains why:
only one nonzero entry exists in that row/column,
so cofactor expansion works immediately,
therefore , etc.
That’s cleaner and more rigorous, especially for a proof-based course. It shows you understand the determinant computation instead of just pattern-matching.
The conclusion is also correct:
⇒ only critical point is ,
leading principal minors alternate signs,
by Sylvester’s criterion the matrix is negative definite,
therefore is a strict local maximum,
and since the quadratic form goes to , it’s also the global maximum.
This is what ai said lol
!noai
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
Atleast i am trying to help
I appreciate it
At least?
AI is helping, you are not even contributing
I am trying
You are trying?
Is it bad to try to help?
Sounds like AI trying.
Yes, you are not helping, and it's straightforwardly bad.
Did i said no?
It does not matter whether its 'atleast' or 'atmost'; server policy deems so. We'd rather have good inputs than inputs that were not thought out or original. I appreciate your interest and your dedication, but please if you were trying to help, put it in more credible forms of helping than pinging an AI to do so. If the AI content was viable, OP could have asked an AI himself, you didn't need to do it for him.
Chill out
Sorry
Cuz i did a good promot with ai
This is whyvi used it
Its always accurate
I feel my message is clear enough for me to not repeat my statement again.
Yes
Cold
-# Hi Aza! Im Minh btw i changed nickname 😭
This is wrong. AI is never "always accurate", no matter how good you are at prompting. Always double check any answer you get from AI, and don't use it in this server.
Yh insted of helping the guy u guys are blaming me for using ai to help
This gen is coocked tbh
If k know i would totally help
But he was just being ignored so i tried to attempt
Informing is not the same as blaming.
I see it as a blame for me
You are not attempting.
Yup, and you deserve that blame.
I dont wana give something wrong from me
!redir
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
I'd say the second solution is better only because it explains more what is actually happening.
I think both would be valid though.
@civic crag Has your question been resolved?
Well, true, but he is going against the rule though.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
[ prpl G_Y(y) = \P(Y le y) = \P(T^3 le y) = \P(T le y^{1/3}) = F_T(y^{1/3}) ]
Why is Y<=t?
This is what the cummulative func is by def
I always thought it was P(Y<=y)
it's a variable name
Thanks
And then I substitute in y^1/3?
Yeah
Also sorry this is really silly but what’s the diff between Y and y😭
Y is just a random variable, y is a specific value Y can take
Y=Y(omega) maps a random outcome omega to a real number y
for example T was machine life time and t is then the number of months for instance
yes
Wait the markscheme says it’s 1-
Ohh okay oops
\prpl Also notice that
[ X^2 ge frac{1}{y} implies X ge frac{1}{sqrt{y}} \text{ and } lp X le -frac{1}{sqrt{y}} rp ]
but we can omit the second case since $X ge 1$.
of the integral?
Like for the cumulative distribution function
Are you referring to iii
No for 2I
Im writing the cumulative distribution function for y
So shouldn’t the limits change
If x>=1 then what does that imply for y
y>=1
x>=1 => x²>=1 => 1/y>=1
so what is y
1>=y?
0
yes
So it’s 0<=y<=1
yes
Perfect
@clever sphinx Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @clever sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't understand the step involving forming a determinant from the second order differential equation.
Why does that work? How can you just ignore Ae^3x and Be^5x in the drterminant like that? Why is it valid? I don't remember studying this. Please explain it to me.
There's a lot of theory with Wronskian involved. Here's a start
https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/classes/de/FundamentalSetsofSolutions.aspx#Wronskian
In this section we will a look at some of the theory behind the solution to second order differential equations. We define fundamental sets of solutions and discuss how they can be used to get a general solution to a homogeneous second order differential equation. We will also define the Wronskian and show how it can be used to determine if a ...
<@&268886789983436800>
@slim smelt Has your question been resolved?
I'm still reading the notes
Honestly, man, I read this entire thing and I didn't understand a thing. I've never come across the term "Wronskian" ever before and it seems like too much theory for just one problem especially since it's never been mentioned before. I could, of course, go through the entire notes of this guy and understand it thoroughly, but that seems a bit excessive for just trying to understand one problem. Thank you, though. I've bookmarked that blog
i feel like they just converted the polynomial into vector form
Ax=0 , solve for A=0 cuz x cant be = 0 in this case
lemme try use my bad handwriting real quick
tho i dont understand the question fully , are we just supposed to make a DE out of the given solution?
Yeah
yes math problems beyond high school is typically based on a lot of theory and if you want to learn the "why" behind doing the calculations, you have to learn the theory. if you just want to do the rote calculations then you don't need to understand the theory behind wronskians
Here's the rest of the solution but they just solved the determinant which I know how to do. I'm just stuck on how they created it out of thin air like that in the first place
I mean, fair enough. I was hoping there would be some easier explanation
easy and math don't go together beyond calculus, for most people at least
Is there a particular book on ordinary differential equations that you can recommend for undergraduates that goes over alot of theory but starts from the basics (like only assuming calc 1 or 2 knowledge)
there's plenty in #book-recommendations
or are these notes that you've given enough?
enough for this problem yes
Closed by @slim smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Assuming you got it correct, you can probably set a=1, and enter the values for b,c, and d appropriately
Hmm
Do I need to take into account that it’s -b/a?
Well a=1 right?
yes
So it becomes -b and not -b/a
Just find everything in terms of a.
Also, you can wrap the whole thing with k, so its k(x^3+bx^2+cx+d)
hey , hey does anybody here speak german , has time and could explain to me how parabolas(parabeln) work? I write the big exam tomorrow and I understand NOTHING OF PARABOLAS I need help and I really need to pass
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
So the polynomial is in the form ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0 and I’m solving for a b c and d?
Im just confused about the signs really
If -b/a = -2/5 I sub in 2/5?
Basically just x cubed+ (sum of the roots) x squared - (sum of two roots) x + (product of roots)=0
-b/a = -2/5 implies b/a = 2/5, so yeah, if a = 1, b = 2/5
From vesta's formula normal is x squared - (sum of roots)+ (product of roots)=0
So let's take a out. The polynomial becomes a(x^3+b/ax^2+c/ax+d/a) now you should easily be able to solve it
Thank you
np
Actually signs came from normal quadratic equation, -b/a from sum of the roots, c/a is the product of the roots
Since cubic equation have 1 more roots, they will have sum of 2 roots in the middle
Becomes -b/a, c/a and -d/a
The signs have already been taken care of in this work. The polynomial assumed was ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = 0, and from the relations, one gets (taking a = 1) that b = 2/5, c = -27/25 and d = -81/25
So the cubic equation is x^3 + 2/5 x^2 - 27/25 x - 81/25 = 0
Multiplying it by 25 does not extinguish any of its solutions, nor does it add any.
@clever sphinx Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @clever sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Well, I ment like taking points like -1, -0.5 , 0, 0.5 and 1
r(t) = (t^2, t^2)
plotting in geogebra leads to an "X" type shape
how
yeah
I mean, your graph is pretty accurate to what geogebra plots
what
.close
Closed by @spring oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i will continue later but this graph looks like a butt crack, right?
srry
A bit hahahahha, nice, im going to sleep, good luck with it
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with asvab math like alegbra and geometry
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
Ask away!
@unique pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am completely stumped on this
@junior heron Has your question been resolved?
have you learnt it yet?
yeah i understand that its like w = Pz so that you can convert a crazy matrix into a normal one to make a phase image aligned with the axes
i dont know how to show this question tho
idk where to start
have you tried applying P to the line equation?
also I assume here we assume w=(u v) an z equals to (x y)?
yes
i dont even know how
the line isnt a matrix or a vector but P is
idk how to apply it
well notice that the equation is basically [D E][u; v] +F=0
HMMMM
true
so we've found w
so i need to apply p to this
wait is [D E] = P
hmmm
i dont know how to apply P to this still
i tried this
i guess that's still a line because there's no exponents or anything so this is still a line
and pluggging in 0 for u and v results in the same thing
is that all it wants
@junior heron Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @junior heron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Hello, does anyone know how to find angle A?
Send this to new channel please.
This channel is going to collapse soon.
Yes except it’s x y and not u v on line 4
Sorry for the late reply btw I had PE class just now
And P inverse if it has one
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$(a + b)^2 = a^2 + b^2$?
Hanako(x, y); ∂(fox)/∂x
aren't you forgetting a couple of terms here?
hm
undeserving terms will be igniored
i tried again but i dont think im doing it right
well you'll probably have to first remember what (a + b)^2 expands to
write z as a+ b
a is the real part, b the imaginary part bruh
I want you to look carefully at your complex number representation
just, hard stare at what you wrote about z
then think about your own question
well I copied the question correctly right
I never said you did it wrong
but I want you to look hard at your z, then look at your question
ok I understan
d
how do i multipy those 2 in red?
Well, if you have the terms in those things, just let them be a and b?
Then sqrt a * sqrt b = sqrt(ab).
I don't think of anything else at this point, would you have to just put 2i to the side and then multiply with the square root of (ab).
Whereas a = 2+sqrt 2, b = 2-sqrt 2.
wdym?
Then it aligns with a^2 - b^2 form also.
Well, if you let $a=2+\sqrt{2}$ and $b=2-\sqrt{2}$.
Mercury (ヤフォダ)
thats not what i did tho
Then would you have $2\sqrt{a} \cdot i\sqrt{b}$.
Mercury (ヤフォダ)
Which can be simplified further into: $2i\sqrt{ab}$.
Mercury (ヤフォダ)
What did you do?
Well, isn't that's what I explained?
Mercury (ヤフォダ)
The things inside that big square root.
how?
Look here.
Now, note the left term.
Do you see number 2 and the big square root next to it?
Then you can just let the values $2+\sqrt{2}$ inside that root be $a$.
Mercury (ヤフォダ)
Well, you got that?
Let me explain.
Next, go to the left term.
We do the same, let $2-\sqrt{2}$ be $b$.
Mercury (ヤフォダ)
So now, you have $i\sqrt{b}$.
Mercury (ヤフォダ)
Right?
correct
Well then you have $2\sqrt{a} \cdot i\sqrt{b}$
Mercury (ヤフォダ)
Can you simplify it?
$2i/sqrt(ab))$
ø
i forgot how to
Correct.
No worries.
Now, do you see a and b, when a times b, do they looks like an identity?
$(2+\sqrt{2})(2-\sqrt{2})$
Mercury (ヤフォダ)
that evaluates to 2+4sqrt(2)
Mercury (ヤフォダ)
Is it flick an idea?
difference of squares
Correct.
a^2-b^2
Now can you redo?
redo what?
yea 4-2 which is 2
Now, $\sqrt{ab}$ will be?
Mercury (ヤフォダ)
You just found out ab = 2.
@keen sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I feel dumb but I completely forgot how to do this
what's the question
Err can you please state the full question, or give us a screenshot of it
OH my gosh duh im sorry i knew i was forgetting something
Segment DE is the perpendicular bisector of AC. Find the length of AE
not enough information given
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
did you try entering 14x + 12
show the error
ah my bad
i didn't notice the tick marks
these mean the lengths AE and EC are equal
yep I tried that it was wrong
you could apply the definition of bisector,
however the end result doesn't make sense
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
,w solve 14x+12 = 8x-6
yes that's why it's important for you to show your work
bruh my work is really messy
14(-3)+12
-42+12
-30
make it not messy 
there u go
It just gives me a thumbs down and says try again
could be a teacher error
Closed by @dawn oar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I need help w/ geogebra
I'm doing some last minute stuyding of trigonometry, and my geogebra is betraying me
I'm trying to use cosinus to find the degree of a corner, but I'm not getting the answer in degrees
My input is acos(9/10)
My answer is correct (chatgpt said so), but I don't know how to get the answer in degrees
thanks in advance :)
Either check the options or multiply the result by 180/pi
I checked options and it's set to give the answer in degrees
I'll try the pi thing though
oo lets go, it worked
Thank you so much!!!!!!
Note that it only works on angles
So sin(x [rad]) = sin(x * 180/pi [deg]))
Closed by @zealous stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
somebody plssssss
just copy paste the question here so people don't have to click different things to help you
i will.
@sick delta Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
{x€N|3<x}
Do you have a math question
Yes

Very informative
@tepid mantle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain what these mean?
Distributive property
Means expansion
Because of the word distributive
I know what it is, just what makes each problem have, commutative, associative, or distributive
Ah I see
commutative: order doesn't matter
associative: grouping doesn't matter
distributive: multiplying across/expanding
ex. for number 1, it shows that the order does not matter
therefore it is commutative
1st is because its +
⬇️
Refer to this image above
So on question 2 what made it associative
sorry u mean question 4?
question 2 is commutative
Yeah 3x2 is the same as 2x3 you still get the same answer
As an example
it's not associative because it is not changing the grouping.
its just changing the order in which it is written. the parentheses are around the same terms
Wait that’s so easy
Okay more questions
How would I do this stuff sorry about the lighting
Uhh
same thing, youre just naming the properties
compare to this
The first one is associative?
tried to make it look a little better. refer to original pic for the numbers that didn't generate properly.
sometimes ai is in fact useful :)
AI wasted water why I come here instead of asking ChatGPT
don't worry, i'll balance it out by not drinking water for 1 year.
So the first one is associative
are you starting at question 16 or 17?
16
that is not associative in the first step
(try taking a look at the other properties first)
I really don’t understand
it isn't explicitly stated in the image sent by the other helper, however this is a form of distributive property
$(a+b)(c+d) = a(c+d) + b(c+d)$
Krish
which eventually evaluates to ac + ad + bc + bd
It would be distributive prop of multiplication
yes
And then next is also distributive
well, also you don't have to state distributive property "of multiplication"
distributive property only applies to multiplication
what are you distributing in that step?
Is it associative
did any of the parentheses move around?
yes, and explain your reasoning?
something besides "because its not the other two"
Idk
well, what does the property say?
Commutative
i know the name, i'm asking the definition.
I don’t know
look back at the image and tell me what it says
Which image
^
It’s the same both ways I don’t know
Yes?
No
http://www.brightstorm.com/math/algebra-2
SUBSCRIBE FOR All OUR VIDEOS!
https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=brightstorm2
VISIT BRIGHTSTORM.com FOR TONS OF VIDEO TUTORIALS AND OTHER FEATURES!
http://www.brightstorm.com/
LET'S CONNECT!
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/brightstorm
Pinterest ► https://www.pinterest.com/bri...
try watching this video
It’s rearranging
yes, changing the order.
I got it
Why is the last one distributive
like the last step?
Yes
the last step is not distributive
or are you talking about the last one we did (the first line)
On number 16 AC+AD+BC+BD
hmm, that's wrong. going from CA+DA+CB+DB to AC+AD+BC+BD is not distributive
yes
which property of addition?
This one
i know which one, im saying which property of addition. it has two different properties, associative and commutative
Commutative
for the last line it's not the commutative property of addition
the commutative property of addition states something like a + b = b + a
Just commutative property?
well no, you have to specify it
yes but don't just use process of elimination, you should understand why
did you watch the video?
I do not understand anything that is going on right now
My teacher is stupid and doesn’t teach
No
go watch that, that's why i sent it
I don’t learn from videos I learn from visual and verbal explanations
Something my teacher lacks
Yo
.closr
.close
Closed by @echo pilot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone prove this
@keen sundial Has your question been resolved?
Yea
So you know how you can represent a line in vector form as $\vec{r} = r_{0} + t \vec{v}$ where v is the direction vector
InterGalactic
and $r_{0}$ has $<x_0, y_0, z_0>$
InterGalactic
with $\vec{v} = <a_1, a_2, a_3>$
InterGalactic
putting all together we have $<x_0, y_0, z_0> + t<a_1, a_2, a_3>$
InterGalactic
InterGalactic
so the x,y,z of our vector is
$$ x = x_0 + ta_1$$
$$y = y_0 + ta_2$$
$$z = z_0 + ta_3$$
InterGalactic
now for each of them if you isolate t
you will get that
$\frac{ x - x_0}{a_1} = \frac{y-y_0}{a_2} = \frac{z-z_0}{a_3}$
InterGalactic
@keen sundial
does that make sense
it is just expanding the vector form
to get the parametric representation of it
Closed by @keen sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
“The span of two non zero non parallel vectors is a plane through the origin”
I don’t get the “plane through the origin” bit
is it the plane bit, the origin bit or both
That whole statement
alright
the idea behind it is that when two vectors are not parallel (in the 2d case at least - more precisely, if the two vectors are independent), then each vector will increase the span of the set of vectors
in the case of having two linearly independent (or non-parallel) vectors, this means that the combination of both vectors spans a 2 dimensional space
this is what constitutes a 'plane' in higher dimensions
the part about the origin is that due to the properties of linear algebra, the origin should not move in any way under the product of any transformation
so every plane should contain the origin
the definition of span is the set of all possible linear combinations. the zero vector is in any span regardless of the question or values given to you
Wdym?
A better way to explain it is as Krish mentioned, the 0 vector (or the origin) will always be present in some linear combination of vectors by setting the coefficients to 0
Also after we’re done with this, I need this explained too
in the case of a 2-dimensional set of vectors ${v_1,v_2 }$ for example, for some linear combination $av_1+bv_2, \ \a,b \in \mathbb R$, $a=0,b=0$ corresponds to the origin
Gizmic
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
to add on to this, this is also the reason why spans are subspaces (if you have covered that), since every subspace must also contain the zero vector
Fair
What’s a subspace?
basically a collection of vectors. theres three main rules of a subspace iirc, that the zero vector is in the set, if you add two vectors in a set the result should also be in the set, and any scalar multiple of a vector in the set should also be in the set
for example, R^3 is a subspace itself
another ex. a line y = 5x in R^2 is a subspace since it goes through the origin, but y = 5x + 1 is not, because (0, 0) is not on that line
@keen sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @keen sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to connect these to I tried the elipse formulla
rotated parabola
yeah, you could use a horizontally stretch parabola of the form $x = ay^2$, where $0 < a <1$
TestTickler
rotate it
how
rotation matrix
?
.
i guess you could play around with a radical function of the form $a\sqrt{x+b} + k$
TestTickler
thats only for the top half
for the other half missing to connect just do the negative version, so something of the form $-a\sqrt{x+b}+k$
TestTickler
probably want a higher a value since it needs to be a bit steeper
since youre not allowed to use the rotated parabolas like x = y^2
you can do it this way
just mess around with the scaling on the radical function and also the height at which it needs to be to fit your graph
what variables do i put im using sliders
of this form $a\sqrt{x+b}+k$
TestTickler
mess around with a,b,k
yeah
Hi
yeah just combine it with the "negative" version of the function
ye
originally this was absolute value but i just halved it
and now im trying to do linear
should i do linear or a mirror of absolute value
for what
the brows
for the eye shape what should i do
just do linear for that
SCAM
i did ax^2+bx+c
SCAMMM
<@&268886789983436800>
is ther anyway to make touch the corner of the purple
probably need two different abs value functions
@proper otter Has your question been resolved?
nice bro
i need help are you still available
so like what we did with the $a\sqrt{x+b}+k$
TestTickler
but this time its in the other direction, so $a\sqrt{-(x+b)}+k$
TestTickler
TestTickler
@proper otter Has your question been resolved?
Could i have some help with a trig question?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Thank you!
No worries!
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What even is (2 0)?
vec a
you need to compute the magnitudes i guess
Ye the dot product is a magnitude not a vector
|a->| represents magnitude
this was their solutionon
Yes. You need to compute the dot product along with the magnitudes.
how do we find magnitude again
Sqrt(x^2+y^2)
-# why is there a random lego brick on the side ;-;
bru I cant lie, no clue either
Yes, and so cos(theta) is not just the product of the magnitudes.
So write that the dot product=2sqrt2 cos(theta)
And then find the dot product another way
Yes
The outside angle could equally represent the angle separating two vectors.
It's conventional to take the smallest of the two.
Hence why they specify in [0,pi]. Even then generally the "angle between two vectors" refers to the smallest such angle, and arccos will always yield that one anyway.
makes sense
so does this formula ( I assume its called the re-arranged dot product formula or if there is a specefic name let me know) always considers the internal angle?
It would work equally with either, since they would both have the same cosine.
But arccos always spits out some angle in [0,pi] anyway
So unless you’re looking for the bigger angle explicitly you’ll always get the “right” angle
ohhh makes sense
and whats this formula called? the one i mentioend in the brackets
I don’t think it has a specific name. As you said it’s just derived from the dot product definition.
-# just as you wouldn't say that V = IR is Ohm's law but I = V/R, which you get by dividing by R on both sides, has a separate name.
<@&268886789983436800>
Closed by @keen sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
19 th question
,rccw
okay so i feel we can do this if we show EF is parallel to GH
The diagram I drew is right
I am jst nt able to understand how is angle hae and angle gcf equal
Yes but idk how to do next step
,rccw
If we prove these angles equal then by sas
We can say that he and gf are parallel
And similarly opp side is parallel hence Its a parallelogram
i mean you can show AE is parallel to FC
because AE is parallel to OB and OB to FC
now also AE = OB and OB = FC
so AE = FC
so AE = FC and AE || FC
so AEFC is a parallelogram
got it?
similarly HAGC is a parallelogram
can you continue from here?
But we jst know its parallel nt equal right ?
No
why?
angle chasing i think will work here
oh i got it
so
Wt is that
Had?
angles
now since HAD = ADO and BAE = ABO so i feel if we consider triangles AOD and AOB we can show this
Wt can we show
from triangles AOB and AOB, since BD is a straight line we have AOD + AOB = 180
so (180-OAD-ODA) + (180-OAB - OBA) = 180
i feel we cna continue
if we cannot im really sorry
How can u say bd is an straight line ?
How abt this method
Bd is nt a diagonal of parallelogram abcd
because it is a disgonal of ABCD
It's nt mentioned in the question wont it be our assumption then ?
We can't assume things by diagram right ?
because ABCD is a paralleogram
by definiiton
BD and Ac
are its diagonals
no need for a figure anyhow
But o Is random point in parallelogram
Can u see this
And explain me ?
nono my approach is wrong
,rccw
yes it seems to work, but im not exactly the best on geoemtry so ill wati for another helper
Okayy
<@&286206848099549185>
wsgg
,rccw
,rccw
demn
Wt
Oh😔
🥀
<@&286206848099549185>
What's the problem
