#help-27
1 messages · Page 439 of 1
idk bout the sum but ik that
$$ \int ln(u) dx = \frac{uln(u) -u}{u'} + c $$
when u is linear in terms of x
Mr. Smith
idk if that sum is standard or not
but by the looks of it i'd try to relate it to an integral
The sum expands to 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+...
There is a power series that can help with that iirc
@simple mesa Has your question been resolved?
i need the answer
is this meant to be done without a calculator?
because just simplify the constants and bring them all together, then just solve the sum and integral no?
it simplifies nicely
@simple mesa Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im having trouble figuring out how to sketch from a slope field
like it looks really overwhelming for me
@frigid tartan Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
hrrggg i guess
The graph below y=1 should be somewhat less vertical but you get the idea
yea
i guess my second question is
for part b
is the line tangent to the graph that i drew on the slope field?
is dy/dx the graph i drew
I believe what you drew is f(x) itself
yup
now use the inital condition to find C
or
first rearrange your equation
so you get y = ....
then getting C will be easier
yup
nono its okay
👍
i think ive had like 5 diff people come and go from here 😭
Wait did you finish b yet
i need to plug in 1.3
Into the line equation
yea
i got 1.6
and for c
my answer is this one
thats the specific solution right
cuz i plugged in c
I think it is good
@frigid tartan Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove tat if H is normal in G then the quotient group G/H is a group
What field of math is this
Group Theory
Whars your question
Are you stuck? Need a nudge?
Yep
Do I have to prove the quotient group operation or do I have to prove it's a group ?
What makes a group?
Both
Ok
so how do I start 😅
Answer this
Closure, Associativity Identity and Inverse
Yes
So you can define the binary operation to be
(aH)(bH) = (ab)H on G/H
Or something
Try to prove all four of these now
Is the operation well defined?
Yes I'll try
Alright?
you have to show that this multiplication operation is well defined:
There are many ways to represent aH, what if a'H=aH but a\neq a'? you are saying that a'bH=a'HbH=aHbH=abH. It would be a big issue if a'bH is not equal to abH
Ohh
need to be careful in definition when elements have multiple representations.
So apparently I just have to prove the operation is well defined b4 actually proving it's a group ?
let X and Y be elements of G/H. We define XY to be equal to abH for ANY choice of a\in X, b\in Y.
Writing it like this, it should be evident exactly what you need to prove to absolutely ensure it is well-defined.
Okae lemme try
(as an extra nudge, recall that elements of G/H are cosets, i.e., sets, so showing abH = a'b'H you must show set equality)
@prime hemlock Has your question been resolved?
Phew finally
Correct ?
,rotate
@prime hemlock Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @prime hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone double check my answers
@sullen karma Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sullen karma
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Four couples are to be seated around a circular table. All the couples are to sit together,except for Jeremy and Candace,in such a way that males and females alternate.How many seating arrangements are possible?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
which part are you on^^
thinking part
for a circular table (im assuming rotational symmetry doesnt add more)
you always fix someone as a frame of reference
yes!
-# oh ididnt think of that nice
so, arbitrarily fix someone as a frame of reference as your first step!
i have fixed jeremy
mhm, so since males and females must alternate seats, jeremy's position dictates the gender of every other seat
say jeremy is in seat one
what does that say about the odd and even seats
even seats must be females and odd males ?
yep!
there are four couples so four seats
odd; 1,3,5,7 are male
even; 2,4,6,8 are female
now, Jeremy and Candace cant sit together
for some odd reason
the next step would be to seat candace
candace cannot sit in 8,2 so does that mean that there are 2 ways to seat her ?
yep
seat 4 and 6
so, seat the remaining 3 couples
we have 3 distinct couples to place into these 3 distinct slots if candace is seated in seat 6
we have 3 distinct couples to place into these 3 distinct slots if candace is seated in seat 4
3! x 2 ?
thank you !
.close
Closed by @forest stratus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so here Im unsure of what exactly i need to do
I need to show integrate (-2)^x over (-\infty,0) and show it's equal to that of the inegral of ce^{-3x}?
opps
poission is discrete
yep so you will use sums
so $\sum_{x=1}^{\infty} x(-2x)^{x}$?
Wai
uh no $\sum_{k=0}^\infty (-2)^k P(X=k)$
expectation
tm (#1 number theory fan)
Closed by @lost laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
well (f+g)(x)=f(x)+g(x) and (fg)(x)=f(x)g(x) and just direct substitution for 1 and 2. 3 is using the formal definition of a limit, 4. is basically just the same as what I said for 1 and 2
yeah sry should clarify its only 3 I need help with
search formal definition of a limit I'm not gonna explain the funny epsilon delta definition
@woven radish yo solve this
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
is it not like $\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists \delta > 0 : |x - l| < \delta(\epsilon) \implies |f(x) - f(l)| < \epsilon$
\\
means that $\lim_{x \to l} f(x) = f(l)$
AnitaG
or is this pointwise continuity
I think someone better can explain this
lowk thought there was an /2 in the proof for limit s
dont think this matters
\epsilon / 2 still satisfies requirement
arbitrary ig
this is the continuity of f in l
whats limit thennnn
same but replace l by x_0 and f(l) by alpha in your case
$\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists \delta > 0 : |x - x_0| < \delta \implies |f(x) - \alpha| < \epsilon$
Lin Xia
what you wrote is lim f(x) = f(x_0) that is the definition of f being continuous on x_0
does limit exist imply continuity
not necessarily
but not the converse?
if f is not continuous on x_0
for example take f(x) equal 0 for x < 0 and x > 0 and f equal 1 for x = 1
lim f(x) on 0 is 0 but f(0) = 1
anyway it is not about continuity here
we just assume that g as a limit on x_0 and this limit is \beta
okay
my example you mean ?
yes
no it is not because f(0) is different from the limit
continuity is really this
lim f(x) = f(x_0)
alr got it
ok so for your question 3 you need to use the formal definition of limit for g
so we have $|x - x_0| < \delta(\epsilon) \implies |g(x) - \beta| < \epsilon $
$\forall \epsilon>0 \exists \delta>0 : |x - x_0| < \delta(\epsilon) \implies |g(x) - \beta| < \epsilon $
AnitaG
and you want |g(x)| > \beta/2. What can vlue of epsilon can you take to have this
$|g(x)-\beta| \leq |g(x)| + |\beta|$
AnitaG
kinda lost, inequality sign goes the other way
yes you are right you need to use triangular inequality but not this form
$|g(x)-\beta| \leq \left|g(x) - \frac{\beta}{2}\right| + \left|\frac{\beta}{2}\right|$
not this one either
AnitaG
you need to find something in term of |g(x)| that is less than |g(x) - \beta|
do you know this formula : $$ ||a| - |b||\le |a -b|$$
Lin Xia
yeah idk how besides like trivially 0 is less than mod of g(x) - \beta
I do now 😭
but no I didnt
you can show this from the standard triangular inequality
makes sense conceptually
you can use this one now
k so $||g(x)|-|\beta|| \leq |g(x)-\beta|<\epsilon$
AnitaG
yes so now by definition of absolute value you can find a lower bound for |g(x)|
0
so it reduces to |\beta|
on the LHS
well sure but i was thinking of this |x| < a iff -a < x < a
how can I apply this
use it on $||g(x)| - \beta| < \epsilon$
Lin Xia
$-\epsilon < |g(x)|-|\beta| < \epsilon$
AnitaG
so just choose -\epsilon = 1.5|\beta|?
but that doesnt satisfy epsilon positive
wait
im dumb
epsilon is 0.5|beta|
exact
if you take epsilon = \beta/2 then |g(x)| > \beta/2
r u missing mods bc lazy or are they just not needed
idt question mentions the sgn of beta
i though it was \beta > 0
ok so it is a bit different then
let's assume \beta > 0
.close
Closed by @covert mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$(2xy^2 - 3y^3)dx = (3xy^2-y)dy$
DeC∆rbonizeD
this screams uh
what was it called again
almost exact equation
find integrating factor?
yep
Closed by @pure stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just like he tried two possible equations of pythagoras, why didn't he tried and solved the third equation which can be formed using pythagoras theorem?
(t+1)^2+4^2=(t-1)^2?
try expanding it and see what value of t you get
or more geometrically, the hypotenuse of a right triangle is the longest side
how could t-1 be the length of the hypotenuse if t+1 > t-1?
@raven forge Has your question been resolved?
Makes sense
Very much
so well then
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Wait
I got another question, in this problem what will happen in the case of different parity?
try it yourself, it probably doesn't imply the product is a multiple of 8
also you should limit a channel to one question, to make it easier for us to follow
try if a,b, or c is/are odd/even
truth tables and logic 😱
Alright
.close
Closed by @raven forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Notice that the leading coefficient is 0 and the parabola has roots, so for which intervals is the parabola non-negative?
@stoic relic Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stoic relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
static question idk if it counts
mb thanks a lot
@quaint gull Has your question been resolved?
@quaint gull Has your question been resolved?
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

anything for that better blue role
what is a god amongst mods
prolly rice
Rice is god!!!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Suppose I have a finite dimensional vector space V with dim (V) = n, how would I show dim (W) <= n if W is a subspace of V?
form a basis of W and extend it
But I have no ideas what do you mean form one?
let {w1,..., w_i} be a basis of W
Do I have to construct independent vectors in W?
I asked my peers and other Artificial Intelligence tools, they said that I should pick independent vectors set.
u can always choose a basis of W
as i did
these vectors must be independent in V as well
Right, so if I have a basis, what can I move on from here?
Wait, dim({0}) = 0, right?
yes
Okay, I will pick the first base step whereas W only have a zero vector.
use the fact that this set (the basis of W) is independent in V as well
I still not understand this bit here...
Here is my workout so far:
Suppose $V$ is a finite dimensional vector space such that $\text{dim}(V)=n$.\
Also assume that $W$ is a dimensional vector subspace in $V$, such that $\text{dim}(W)=m$.\
We want to show that $m\leq n$.\
First, we check for zero vector, then $W={0}$ gives $\text{dim}(W)=0$, which the statement holds. Now, suppose $W\neq {0}$, then choose a vector $w_1\neq0$, then $W={w_1}$ and linearly independent.
Mercury.
if W is not the trivial space then why do u conclude W={w1}
Suppose we only pick 1 vector in first which is differs from zero vector.?
we pick a basis of W, {w1,..,w_i}. this means dim(W) = i
since it is a basis in W, a1w1+...+a_iw_i = 0
but this same relation holds in V as well because W is a subspace of V and they share the same 0 vector. Hence this set is independent in V as well
use the first part of the corollary to conclude
I think I should use the first one.
Pick any vectors $w_1,w_2,... w_n$ such that they are linearly independent.
Mercury.
Closed by @celest lantern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you used the number of heads as x, when I think you should be using the payout.
after all, the question wants the SD of the net gain.
yes, but take note: doing so gives you the variance, NOT the SD.
you'll need to square root this to get the SD.
Ohh okay yes
but otherwise, remembering the probability of each event, and using the net gain instead of the number of heads, should be enough for you to continue.
,rotate
I got it wrong again
I put -2 on the end
that does not correct for the squaring done inside the summation.
so your net gain must take into account this upfront payment from the start.
yes.
show your work.
you correctly accounted for the loss, but the payouts in the first two events are still too big.
where's the 4 coming from?
in the event you win $4, you should only have gained $2 because you paid $2 up front.
likewise with the event where you win $2, you should have gained nothing.
yes!
do i keep the negative sign when squaring the -2
squaring anything results in a positive number
except 0, i suppose
squaring any real number gives a nonnegative number :)
keep it anyway
if only to convince yourself and potentially your examiner that you remembered negative payouts exist
@fervent terrace Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’ve been struggling with finding the quadratic equation for this, I’m using an area model and have been using all the x-ints listed, but every time i put them into the area model, it never works out. which x-int should i use?
the x-ints are the numbers near the middle in pencil
what ints have you tried already
@half lodge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where did I go wrong?
The previous part isn’t needed
My final answers is correct except the signs are flipped smh
Can you post the full question
This is only part b
,w integral of tan^(-1)(4x) between 0 and 0.25
,w 1/16 pi - 1/8 ln(2)
I think the error is in the second last step.
nvm
.pin
(In the future, please make the first message you send the actual question since that's what the bot pins. This saves us the effort of having to change the pin manually.)
@barren dune Has your question been resolved?
Thank you
And apologies
Closed by @barren dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so ive got this
and f(x) = x^3 -4x
so
this is really tricky
can i just say that the function h is
between the origin and f
but i gotta prove this somehow
you should show that the midpoint satisfies the equation h(x)
and you can use the information that P satisfies the equation f(x)
wdym satisfies
that means you can do a substitution with h(x)
-# erfüllt die Gleichung
you can use some variables, like say that P is (a,b)
you know some information about (a,b) and you also can figure out the midpoint
hmm
can i just pick some random point
bcs i have a material with the sketch
of f(x)
you can just pick a random point to help visualize it and stuff
but the argument needs to work for all points
ok
i think you want (1/2) f(x/2) = h(x)
ye
but what did you mean by P(a,b
hold in also why 1/2 before f
the midpoint will be half as high as f(x)
i mean, half as high as P
the (a,b) thing was my way of trying to think carefully about the problem
but what you said is fine
why the 1/2 before f tho sorry
try this, pick some x and plot it on f(x)
and plot the midpoint, which will be (x/2, f(x)/2)
so (x/2, f(x)/2) needs to be on h
being on the graph always means h(the first thing) = the second thing
like if (a,b) is on the graph of h, that means h(a) = b
so (x/2, f(x)/2) being on h, means the same thing as h(x/2) = f(x)/2
what is even the midpoint
oh so the y value is also halved?
yeah
oh thats why u said 1/2?
in the image you can see "divided by 2" on both of the coordinates
yeah
the y value of the point P is f(x)
P is at (x, f(x))
once you reach this point: (1/2) f(x) = h(x/2)
then you have to solve some stuff
to show that both sides of that equation are the same
ohhhh dang
ok ill try
ok
yeah
yeah because that's half of f(x)
do you see what i mean?
that's equal to (1/2) f(x)
yeppö
but i hope i can do problems like theseon myown i just cant
you might need to remember the midpoint formula
@neon wagon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @neon wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Gang can someone explain this me i cant understand for some reason💔
Why did they put dx/du there
what part do you not understand?
Already the first part
they basically did something called a u substiution
Bro its confusing me😔
basically let u = 2x^4 - 3
they differentiate with respect to d/dx to du/dx = 8x^3
once they did that
they rearranged dx to make it the subject
to get du/(8x^3) = dx
you can substiute that in into your dx
2999 - 3000 + 1
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Ty gang i think ill just watch a yt video aboyt it🙏
yeah that would probably be better

We will talk about what u-substitution for integration is and its connection to the chain rule for differentiation. This is a basic introduction to integration by u-sub. This is a tutorial for calculus 1 students. If you want more integral practice?
Here are 20 examples on "How to choose the u": https://youtu.be/fYTJkkCyl4s
just calculus tuto...
🥰
my dumbass sending the image of the thumbnail instead of the link 💔
how is the video so far?
come back if it still doesnt make any sense :)
I feel like i can do the questions but i dont actually understand it😔
Like what actually is „dx” and how come you can jusy do that with it🙏
you don't understand what dx means in an integral?
or what it represents?
I though i did🥀
well without delving into too much detail (unless you want it), dx just refers to the variable we are differentiating/integrating with respect to
But how come u can just do du=4dx ir whayver
well, when we're doing u-sub, we may rewrite a function of x in terms of u, provided that we may also rewrite du in terms of dx
as a simple example, consider $\int(x + 1)^{10} dx$
blanketism
we could multiply out x + 1 10 times, but that's a lot of algebra im sure we don't want to do
so what we do instead is we can do u-sub
i'll give you this one so i can explain it, but we may first set u = x + 1
what happens when i differentiate/take the derivative of u with respect to x? i.e., what is du/dx?
<@&268886789983436800>
im sure you have
.
looks good!
id like to say that that's a shorter way of doing the problem since we dont have to multiply out x + 1 10 times lol
when i got du=dx i was like what😭
yeah, its more or less a trivial substitution
just wanted to stick with something simple for you to see it a little better
Yeah ok🥰
anyways
a more practical problem would be something like $\int\sin(x^2 + x)(2x + 1) dx$
blanketism
Then would u=x^2+x?
no worries, that looks good!
It’s still weird that u can multply and divide by dx or du
Thats why it confuses me💔
do you want to know what's actually occurring? or would that confuse you more, you think?
You can try to explain to me🙏
okay, sure
we claim the following:
$$\int f(g(x))g'(x) dx = \int f(u)du\big|_{u = g(x)}$$
blanketism
to see this, we use the chain rule. let $F$ be a function such that $F' = f$ i.e., the derivative of $F$ is $f$. then $(F \circ g)' = (f \circ g) \cdot g'$
blanketism
Wdym by the circle symbol
blanketism
its more or less saying that if you see the derivative of some function, we may integrate with respect to that function
in the sin example i provided, we saw that the derivative of $x^2 + x$ was present, i.e., $2x + 1$ so we may rewrite the integrand in terms of $u = x^2 + x$
blanketism
When i write it it looks like fog💔
lol its okay
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@whole wave Has your question been resolved?
Mb gang i forgot
Closed by @whole wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo guys, how do i Calculate the distance of point P from the line g
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
Intuitively, this distance should be the length of the vector going from P to a point on the line g perpendicularly.
Like in the 2D case.
Write down the parametric equation of a line going through P and a generic point in the line g Q(lambda).
This new line has a certain direction vector. Your goal is to pick lambda such this direction vector and the direction vector of g are orthogonal.
Then your distance will be PQ.
Which part?
Write down the parametric equation of a line going through P and a generic point in the line g Q(lambda).
idk what exactly to do
problem is also the translation, which i gotta do on every 2nd word
@ionic jasper Has your question been resolved?
was geht
oh nvm azy already helping
I'll try a bit but you might explain it better than I do
Well say we pick a point on the line $g$. This point, let's call it $Q(\lambda)$ has the form $\begin{bmatrix}2-\lambda \ 1+3\lambda \ -3+\lambda\end{bmatrix}$.\
Then you can get vector from $P$ to $Q(\lambda)$.
Azyrashacorki
You want this vector PQ(lambda) to be orthogonal to the direction vector of g.
oh mb i didnt saw
the messages
i am not sure but is it meant like this ?
and then u do something with skalar product
like so
Yes essentially
So first I would write down what this vector PQ(lambda) looks like.
Then you can use the dot product of PQ(lambda) with the direction vector of g.
We want this to be 0.
So this will give you an equation involving lambda.
This lambda that you find then will give you the point on g which is closest to P.
Closed by @ionic jasper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(l) ${f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}: f$ is strictly increasing, i.e., $f(x) > f(y)$ whenever $x > y }$.
toast
cardinality of this 🙂
any properties of rational?
instinct says c^aleph_0
wait maybe. not
i also guessed this
these problems are killing me 💀
but i am not 100% sure what peroperties i should use
yeah theres so many 💀
hmm
i may think its just $\mathfrak c$ since we can have countably many points of discontinuities?
blanketism
i think thats true
so can we make
uniquely identify a strictly incresing function
like before
(with continuous functions)
by a set of rationals
i believe so
o rlly
or rather, in the sense that we can associate the countably infinite jump discontinuities with a rational?
there gotta be a specific difference
ye
so maybe we look at limit from both sides
for each rational values
like limx->3-f(x) = 10 but limx->3+f(x) = 20
so we just consider both valuyes?
then its the same thing
idk
hmm i think we wouldnt have to examine the limits, but just counting would be fine
i.e., for any jump discontinuity over some interval, just pick a rational in that interval (may also be a point)
hm
for the middle interval we just pick a rational?
and thats uniquely determinedd
bc
since the function is stirctly increasing
once a raitonal value is "picked" it will never be selected again?
i don't think its uniquely determined
just some rational in the interval will do due to density
wait is c^c = c or is that independent of zf(c)
no, i think c^c is strictly larger
yeah what i guessed
c^c = (2^n)^c = 2^c = c?
the set of picked vaues
i guess
i'm quite sure that a function that is strictly increasing should be continuous a.e.
fact check me on that
so why are we selecting a single rational?
rlly?
idts
wait
maybe i am dumb
and clearly we can make a strictly increasing function with countably many discontinuities
yes
just so that we can associate the number of discontinuities is countable
but iirc there are uncountable sets with zero lebesgue measure so idk
but now
we want to probably make an injection from increasing functions -> {f: Q ->R} right
there's a quite canonical one
let (a1, a2, a3, ...) be a convergent sequence of increasing rational numbers to a limit r
then (f(a1), f(a2), f(a3), ...) should also be monotone
claim: the sequence is bounded above
proof: take any rational number q greater than r, sequence is bounded above by f(q)
so (f(a1), f(a2), f(a3), ...) has a limit by monotone convergence theorem
let this limit be f(r)
analkysis 😩 its been a year haha
ofc check well definedness lol
hmm
you can also claim that there is an injection from that set you described above to f : Q -> R i think
ye
i was thining of doing solemthing like that
actually idk about that
if i have a way of uniquely identifying a increasing function by a set of rational numbers
but the construction above should give some inspiration
yeah
so why cant we just do the same thing as continuous functions, just the only difference we have to look at left and right limits
for some rational x
yeah i think the construction i gave above admits the left limits but not the right 
yeah probably
find a lower bound?
ykk what this is my problem set
imma just bs that
🤣
then for the lower bound
i csn just use the set of linear functions
which is pretty straight forwards c
actually show that the construction above probably uniquely identifies strictly increasing functions
this one?
ye
that is, restricting any strictly increasing function f : R -> R to Q gives a function with the "left limit" f
idk if this is true tho
actually it may be false
take a function defined by
$f(x)=\begin{cases}x&x<\sqrt2\x+1&x\ge\sqrt2\end{cases}$
nAdat12
since sqrt2 is irrational the restriction may not admit f as a left limit idk
actually they're kinda close enough in a sense
i tink so
maybe mod out by "admit the same left limits"?
the hard part is that this may not have the same cardinality hmm
i think i am cooked haha
next i have to do some sort of induction regarding beth umbers
rah
its actually .close or .solved
let me just close this ig
i gave up on that problem since i dont have to provide a strict proof
so maybe providing intuition is enough
.close
Closed by @cerulean ruin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Guys I want to know that how we k> sinx at last step was written k>1
Do you know what it means for a function to be increasing?
No. But you’re very close
f’(x) > 0
The derivative just has to be non-negative
Isn’t it what I said
Tangent and derivative aren’t the slope of the f(x)
You said the derivative had to be grater than 1. Which, is technically true. A derivative greater than 1 would be increasing. But we say for a function to be increasing, its derivative has to be greater than 0
So, what you do, is you take you’re derivative, and create the inequality
If you start with
“kx + cos(x”
Then you’d get:
k - sin(x) > 0
Were you able to get to that step ok?
Yes
Then how they get k>1 from k-sinx >0
For that, we’re gonna do what’s called a sign analysis test
We’re gonna first figure out where it’s equal to 0, and then plug numbers on either side, to check if they’re positive, or negative
It’ll make more sense once we do it
Like this ?
Umm ig he wanna know smthing else
Umm so k is greater than -1 and 1 at same time so....don't you get it ??
Ok, bro. That tones a little bit harsh
It means we take intersection
Mb my english weak
That will give k>1 .
Ye that what I mean smthing like that
Well, that idea is basically saying, what is the max of sin(x)
Yeee
Okk
What is the biggest y value sin can give you?
1
So, in order for you to be greater than sin(x) always…..
What do you have to be bigger than to guarantee that?
K would have it be greater than 1 to be greater than sin(x) everywhere
Closed by @sleek gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How the rate is 7.5 not 2.5km/h
We clearly see that ds/dt is 2.5km/h then why we add dl/dt
the question is asking for the speed of the tip of the shadow, not just the shadow length
and the tip is at distance l + s
yes exactly
Ok
because when the man moves, the shadow length grows and the tip moves
Closed by @sleek gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
of course!
Bruh can you tell me what is this ds/dt here
Like if the question wanted to ask ds/dt then what It would have asked
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-27 message
@summer summit
differenciation of s with respect to time
ds/dt idhar is the speed at which the shadow is moving
Og name btw
as in the rate of change of length of the shadow
So the rate of change of length of shadow and the rate of change of tip of the shadow aren’t the same
to summarize, It's the instantaneous velocity
The qsn would have been asking at what rate does the length of the shadow change
no
rate of change of tip of shadow is d(l+s) / dt
Ok
@sleek gull Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is every even function with co-domain of real numbers an into function?
and is this opposite for odd functions or there is no correlation at all?
if not what are some examples ?
what's an into function?
did you mean onto?
is "into" just another term for injective?
wait no, an into function is apparently a function whose codomain contains at least one element not mapped to by the function?
no into as in if a functions codomain is not equal to range

I'd love if you could use the term non-surjective, because I doubt that the terms 'onto' and 'into' are used in higher contexts.
oh ok i have no idea as i am learning these terms in school
consider
f(-x)=f(x)
$$f(x) =
\begin{cases}
\ln(x) & \text{if } x > 0 \
0 & \text{if } x = 0 \
\ln(-x) & \text{if } x < 0
\end{cases}$$
Annie Maqionde
mod?
okay, let's use the absolute value function f(x) = |x|.
yes
is this non-surjective?
for your reference, this function is surjective, but its also even.
yes
there you have a counterexample for your first question.
hm?
but i asked if all
is every even function with co-domain of real numbers an into function?
wait wasnt his question all even functions are non-surjective
that's false; i provided an example above
usually for all the functions you'll encounter at school it is true.
oops, my bad.
this example?
but I can produce another CE either way (f(x) = x^2 sin(x^2)), so the conclusion still stands.
it's not true generally, but at your level of education it may be accepted to be true
Isnt that always dependent on how you define your codomain
codomain in OP's question is R.
Ok
so now onto your second question.
Yes.
what's your definition of an odd function?
f(-x)=-f(x)
is this function continuous?
fantastic. now take a look at f(x) = sin(x) and tell me if it is odd, and if it is surjective.
hint: consider trigonometric functions such as arctan, or tanh, or sin, cos, etc. they're odd. are they surjective?
no
your question never needed the function to be continuous.
by functions, we don't imply continuity. As I've mentioned earlier, at your level of education, we may the first property holds.
yes it is odd and but surjective on [-1,1] right?
your codomain as you mentioned is R.
your codomain is R.
if not R, then you can always construct a codomain such that the function is surjective in it(usually, again)
the range of sin is [-1, 1], yes. but again, your codomain is R.
So the first property holds usually, the second, not, if your codomain is R.
so it will be non surjective?
well, does sin(x) hit any value outside [-1, 1]?
no
there you have it.
Closed by @amber bone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
F_yeet = ((m * a + kx) * J^2) / R
. open
how to open
i want a pic for the equation
how to open
if you only want a picture for the equation, use #latex-testing.
then ask in #latex-help.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that if $N$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ then $n_p(G/N) \leq n_p(G)$.
blanketism
i might just be tired, but im lowkey kinda tweakin
preliminary ideas are to take a mapping from $\text{Syl}_p(G) \to \text{Syl}_p(G/N)$ but other than that, idek
blanketism
or maybe the natural projection would do something here
only reason id like to work with this mapping is that showing surjectivity would be what i want

my goat 😔 hope someone can help u soon
actually wait, i think i got it. if pi is the natural proj homomorphism, need to show |G/N : pi(P)| is coprime to p. |G/N : PN/N| = |G : PN|.
|G:P| = |G:PN||PN:P| so that |G:PN| divides |G:P| which is then coprime to p, hence pi(P) is in syl_p(G/N) hence map is well defined.
then surjectivity is sort of trivial right? for some $\bar Q \in Syl_p(G/N)$, then there exists $\bar g \in G/N$ such that
blanketism
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
oops
Let $\pi$ denote the natural projection homomorphism. We need to show that $|G/N : \pi(P)|$ is coprime to $p$. Using the Second Isomorphism Theorem, we see that
\[|G/N : PN/N| = |G : PN|\]
Since $P \leq PN \leq G$, then $|G :PN|$ divides $|G:P|$ which is coprime to $p$, hence $\pi(P) \in \text{Syl}_p(G/N)$.
To show that $\phi$ is surjective, let $\bar Q \in \text{Syl}_p(G/N)$. By definition, there exists some $\bar g \in G/N$ such that
\[\bar Q = \bar g\bar P \bar g^{-1} = \pi(gPg^{-1})\]
By definition, $P \in \text{Syl}_p(G)$ implies taht $gPg^{-1} \in \text{Syl}_p(G)$, hence $\phi$ is surjective. The result follows.
?
blanketism
Closed by @dim perch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.