#help-27

1 messages · Page 439 of 1

plush quarry
#

(btw, what is this question for?)

pure cedar
#

idk bout the sum but ik that
$$ \int ln(u) dx = \frac{uln(u) -u}{u'} + c $$
when u is linear in terms of x

woven radishBOT
#

Mr. Smith

pure cedar
#

idk if that sum is standard or not
but by the looks of it i'd try to relate it to an integral

plush quarry
#

The sum expands to 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5-1/6+...

#

There is a power series that can help with that iirc

pure cedar
#

oh yeah

#

its the taylor polynomial for lnx ig

devout snowBOT
#

@simple mesa Has your question been resolved?

simple mesa
#

i need the answer

bronze void
#

is this meant to be done without a calculator?

#

because just simplify the constants and bring them all together, then just solve the sum and integral no?

#

it simplifies nicely

devout snowBOT
#

@simple mesa Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frigid tartan
devout snowBOT
frigid tartan
#

im having trouble figuring out how to sketch from a slope field

#

like it looks really overwhelming for me

devout snowBOT
#

@frigid tartan Has your question been resolved?

frigid tartan
#

<@&286206848099549185>

lunar harbor
#

Just trace the segments in the slope field tbh

#

Something like this works

frigid tartan
#

hrrggg i guess

coarse flume
#

The graph below y=1 should be somewhat less vertical but you get the idea

frigid tartan
#

yea

#

i guess my second question is

#

for part b

#

is the line tangent to the graph that i drew on the slope field?

#

is dy/dx the graph i drew

coarse flume
#

I believe what you drew is f(x) itself

frigid tartan
#

is this what b is asking

#

do you think

#

idk the wording is really confusinh

sacred sedge
#

it is asking to solve the differential equation for y(x)

#

It is a seperable ODE

frigid tartan
#

like this

#

?

sacred sedge
#

yup

#

now use the inital condition to find C

#

or

#

first rearrange your equation

#

so you get y = ....

#

then getting C will be easier

frigid tartan
#

?

sacred sedge
#

yup

frigid tartan
#

wait are we still on part b or part c

sacred sedge
#

oh I read part c

#

as part b

#

hold on sorry

frigid tartan
#

nono its okay

coarse flume
frigid tartan
#

i think ive had like 5 diff people come and go from here 😭

sacred sedge
#

now solve for f(1.3)

frigid tartan
#

uhhh

coarse flume
#

Wait did you finish b yet

frigid tartan
#

i need to plug in 1.3

coarse flume
frigid tartan
#

yea

#

i got 1.6

#

and for c

#

my answer is this one

#

thats the specific solution right

#

cuz i plugged in c

sacred sedge
#

I think it is good

devout snowBOT
#

@frigid tartan Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

prime hemlock
#

Prove tat if H is normal in G then the quotient group G/H is a group

modest dune
#

What field of math is this

prime hemlock
#

Group Theory

modest dune
#

Okay

#

Gl

sand quarry
#

Are you stuck? Need a nudge?

prime hemlock
#

Do I have to prove the quotient group operation or do I have to prove it's a group ?

sand quarry
prime hemlock
#

Ok
so how do I start 😅

sand quarry
prime hemlock
sand quarry
#

Yes

#

So you can define the binary operation to be
(aH)(bH) = (ab)H on G/H

#

Or something

sand quarry
sand quarry
prime hemlock
#

Yes I'll try

prime hemlock
near jolt
# prime hemlock Alright?

you have to show that this multiplication operation is well defined:

There are many ways to represent aH, what if a'H=aH but a\neq a'? you are saying that a'bH=a'HbH=aHbH=abH. It would be a big issue if a'bH is not equal to abH

near jolt
#

need to be careful in definition when elements have multiple representations.

prime hemlock
#

So apparently I just have to prove the operation is well defined b4 actually proving it's a group ?

near jolt
#

let X and Y be elements of G/H. We define XY to be equal to abH for ANY choice of a\in X, b\in Y.

Writing it like this, it should be evident exactly what you need to prove to absolutely ensure it is well-defined.

prime hemlock
#

Okae lemme try

dim perch
#

(as an extra nudge, recall that elements of G/H are cosets, i.e., sets, so showing abH = a'b'H you must show set equality)

devout snowBOT
#

@prime hemlock Has your question been resolved?

prime hemlock
woven radishBOT
devout snowBOT
#

@prime hemlock Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @prime hemlock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sullen karma
devout snowBOT
sullen karma
#

can someone double check my answers

devout snowBOT
#

@sullen karma Has your question been resolved?

lean crater
#

wait

#

yeah part a is incorrect

#

youre missing K to M and K to N

sullen karma
#

oh yeah just realised

#

alr ty

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sullen karma

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

forest stratus
#

Four couples are to be seated around a circular table. All the couples are to sit together,except for Jeremy and Candace,in such a way that males and females alternate.How many seating arrangements are possible?

lean crater
#

!status

devout snowBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
forest stratus
#

thinking part

lean crater
#

for a circular table (im assuming rotational symmetry doesnt add more)

#

you always fix someone as a frame of reference

forest stratus
#

yes!

sharp adder
lean crater
#

so, arbitrarily fix someone as a frame of reference as your first step!

forest stratus
#

i have fixed jeremy

lean crater
#

mhm, so since males and females must alternate seats, jeremy's position dictates the gender of every other seat

#

say jeremy is in seat one

#

what does that say about the odd and even seats

forest stratus
#

even seats must be females and odd males ?

lean crater
#

yep!

#

there are four couples so four seats
odd; 1,3,5,7 are male
even; 2,4,6,8 are female

#

now, Jeremy and Candace cant sit together

#

for some odd reason

#

the next step would be to seat candace

forest stratus
#

candace cannot sit in 8,2 so does that mean that there are 2 ways to seat her ?

lean crater
#

yep

#

seat 4 and 6

#

so, seat the remaining 3 couples

#

we have 3 distinct couples to place into these 3 distinct slots if candace is seated in seat 6

we have 3 distinct couples to place into these 3 distinct slots if candace is seated in seat 4

forest stratus
#

3! x 2 ?

lean crater
#

yep!

#

and thats your answer

forest stratus
#

thank you !

lean crater
#

anytime!

#

if youre done

#

type .close

forest stratus
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @forest stratus

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lost laurel
devout snowBOT
lost laurel
#

so here Im unsure of what exactly i need to do

#

I need to show integrate (-2)^x over (-\infty,0) and show it's equal to that of the inegral of ce^{-3x}?

#

opps

#

poission is discrete

grand warren
lost laurel
#

so $\sum_{x=1}^{\infty} x(-2x)^{x}$?

woven radishBOT
lost laurel
#

but that diverges

#

is that supposed to be (-2)^{X} or what

sand quarry
#

Thays nkt right

#

Like

#

Why is it multiplied with x

grand warren
lost laurel
woven radishBOT
#

tm (#1 number theory fan)

lost laurel
#

cool

#

thanks!

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lost laurel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

covert mango
devout snowBOT
dark sable
# covert mango

well (f+g)(x)=f(x)+g(x) and (fg)(x)=f(x)g(x) and just direct substitution for 1 and 2. 3 is using the formal definition of a limit, 4. is basically just the same as what I said for 1 and 2

covert mango
dark sable
static cobalt
#

@woven radish yo solve this

dark sable
devout snowBOT
static cobalt
#

oh

#

k

#

i shall leave

#

😔

covert mango
woven radishBOT
#

AnitaG

covert mango
#

or is this pointwise continuity

dark sable
#

lowk thought there was an /2 in the proof for limit s

covert mango
#

\epsilon / 2 still satisfies requirement

#

arbitrary ig

arctic yarrow
covert mango
arctic yarrow
#

same but replace l by x_0 and f(l) by alpha in your case

#

$\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists \delta > 0 : |x - x_0| < \delta \implies |f(x) - \alpha| < \epsilon$

woven radishBOT
#

Lin Xia

covert mango
#

how does that make a difference

#

as in \alpha doesnt have to be f(x_0)?

arctic yarrow
#

what you wrote is lim f(x) = f(x_0) that is the definition of f being continuous on x_0

covert mango
#

does limit exist imply continuity

arctic yarrow
covert mango
#

but not the converse?

arctic yarrow
#

if f is not continuous on x_0

#

for example take f(x) equal 0 for x < 0 and x > 0 and f equal 1 for x = 1

#

lim f(x) on 0 is 0 but f(0) = 1

covert mango
#

yeah makes sense

#

has limit at 0 but not continuous at 0

arctic yarrow
#

anyway it is not about continuity here

covert mango
#

wait no it is continuous as 0+ limit equals 0- limit

#

(=0)

arctic yarrow
#

we just assume that g as a limit on x_0 and this limit is \beta

covert mango
#

okay

arctic yarrow
covert mango
#

yes

arctic yarrow
#

no it is not because f(0) is different from the limit

#

continuity is really this

#

lim f(x) = f(x_0)

covert mango
#

alr got it

arctic yarrow
#

ok so for your question 3 you need to use the formal definition of limit for g

covert mango
#

so we have $|x - x_0| < \delta(\epsilon) \implies |g(x) - \beta| < \epsilon $

#
$\forall \epsilon>0 \exists \delta>0 : |x - x_0| < \delta(\epsilon) \implies |g(x) - \beta| < \epsilon $
woven radishBOT
#

AnitaG

arctic yarrow
#

and you want |g(x)| > \beta/2. What can vlue of epsilon can you take to have this

covert mango
woven radishBOT
#

AnitaG

covert mango
arctic yarrow
covert mango
#
$|g(x)-\beta| \leq \left|g(x) - \frac{\beta}{2}\right| + \left|\frac{\beta}{2}\right|$
woven radishBOT
#

AnitaG

arctic yarrow
#

you need to find something in term of |g(x)| that is less than |g(x) - \beta|

#

do you know this formula : $$ ||a| - |b||\le |a -b|$$

woven radishBOT
#

Lin Xia

covert mango
covert mango
#

but no I didnt

arctic yarrow
covert mango
#

makes sense conceptually

arctic yarrow
#

you can use this one now

covert mango
#
k so $||g(x)|-|\beta|| \leq |g(x)-\beta|<\epsilon$
woven radishBOT
#

AnitaG

arctic yarrow
#

yes so now by definition of absolute value you can find a lower bound for |g(x)|

covert mango
#

so it reduces to |\beta|

#

on the LHS

arctic yarrow
covert mango
arctic yarrow
#

use it on $||g(x)| - \beta| < \epsilon$

woven radishBOT
#

Lin Xia

covert mango
#
$-\epsilon < |g(x)|-|\beta| < \epsilon$
woven radishBOT
#

AnitaG

covert mango
#

so just choose -\epsilon = 1.5|\beta|?

#

but that doesnt satisfy epsilon positive

#

wait

#

im dumb

#

epsilon is 0.5|beta|

arctic yarrow
#

if you take epsilon = \beta/2 then |g(x)| > \beta/2

covert mango
#

idt question mentions the sgn of beta

arctic yarrow
#

i though it was \beta > 0

#

ok so it is a bit different then

#

let's assume \beta > 0

covert mango
#

proof still works with negative beta u just use mod

#

brb

arctic yarrow
#

yes you re right

#

just do like this it is more concise

covert mango
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @covert mango

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pure stone
#

$(2xy^2 - 3y^3)dx = (3xy^2-y)dy$

devout snowBOT
woven radishBOT
#

DeC∆rbonizeD

sand quarry
#

what was it called again

#

almost exact equation

#

find integrating factor?

lean crater
#

yep

pure stone
#

oh great it's in my book just never learnt it in class fsr

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @pure stone

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

raven forge
#

Just like he tried two possible equations of pythagoras, why didn't he tried and solved the third equation which can be formed using pythagoras theorem?

dark sable
#

try expanding it and see what value of t you get

jagged harbor
#

or more geometrically, the hypotenuse of a right triangle is the longest side

#

how could t-1 be the length of the hypotenuse if t+1 > t-1?

devout snowBOT
#

@raven forge Has your question been resolved?

raven forge
#

Very much

shy osprey
#

so well then

devout snowBOT
#

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close

raven forge
#

Wait

#

I got another question, in this problem what will happen in the case of different parity?

jagged harbor
#

also you should limit a channel to one question, to make it easier for us to follow

dark sable
#

truth tables and logic 😱

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @raven forge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stoic relic
devout snowBOT
stoic relic
#

what should i do here

#

so far i've done this

#

not sure where to go from here

faint gorge
#

Notice that the leading coefficient is 0 and the parabola has roots, so for which intervals is the parabola non-negative?

devout snowBOT
#

@stoic relic Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @stoic relic

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

devout snowBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quaint gull
#

static question idk if it counts

devout snowBOT
lunar harbor
#

wrong server

quaint gull
#

mb thanks a lot

devout snowBOT
#

@quaint gull Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@quaint gull Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

devout snowBOT
dark sable
#

<@&268886789983436800>

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

hasty cargo
dark sable
livid geyser
#

what is a god amongst mods

dark sable
#

prolly rice

potent dirge
devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

celest lantern
#

Suppose I have a finite dimensional vector space V with dim (V) = n, how would I show dim (W) <= n if W is a subspace of V?

jade pecan
#

form a basis of W and extend it

celest lantern
jade pecan
#

let {w1,..., w_i} be a basis of W

celest lantern
#

Do I have to construct independent vectors in W?

#

I asked my peers and other Artificial Intelligence tools, they said that I should pick independent vectors set.

jade pecan
#

u can always choose a basis of W

#

as i did

#

these vectors must be independent in V as well

celest lantern
#

Right, so if I have a basis, what can I move on from here?

#

Wait, dim({0}) = 0, right?

jade pecan
#

yes

celest lantern
#

Okay, I will pick the first base step whereas W only have a zero vector.

jade pecan
celest lantern
#

I still not understand this bit here...

#

Here is my workout so far:

#

Suppose $V$ is a finite dimensional vector space such that $\text{dim}(V)=n$.\
Also assume that $W$ is a dimensional vector subspace in $V$, such that $\text{dim}(W)=m$.\
We want to show that $m\leq n$.\
First, we check for zero vector, then $W={0}$ gives $\text{dim}(W)=0$, which the statement holds. Now, suppose $W\neq {0}$, then choose a vector $w_1\neq0$, then $W={w_1}$ and linearly independent.

woven radishBOT
#

Mercury.

jade pecan
#

if W is not the trivial space then why do u conclude W={w1}

celest lantern
#

Suppose we only pick 1 vector in first which is differs from zero vector.?

jade pecan
#

we pick a basis of W, {w1,..,w_i}. this means dim(W) = i
since it is a basis in W, a1w1+...+a_iw_i = 0
but this same relation holds in V as well because W is a subspace of V and they share the same 0 vector. Hence this set is independent in V as well
use the first part of the corollary to conclude

celest lantern
#

I think I should use the first one.

#

Pick any vectors $w_1,w_2,... w_n$ such that they are linearly independent.

woven radishBOT
#

Mercury.

celest lantern
#

Alright, thank you. I think I understood this.

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @celest lantern

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fervent terrace
devout snowBOT
fervent terrace
#

This is what I did

#

I missed the probability?

solid perch
#

you used the number of heads as x, when I think you should be using the payout.

#

after all, the question wants the SD of the net gain.

fervent terrace
#

Okay that makes sense

#

Was I also supposed to do sum of (x-m)^2 *p(x)?

solid perch
#

yes, but take note: doing so gives you the variance, NOT the SD.

#

you'll need to square root this to get the SD.

fervent terrace
#

Ohh okay yes

solid perch
#

but otherwise, remembering the probability of each event, and using the net gain instead of the number of heads, should be enough for you to continue.

woven radishBOT
solid perch
#

,rcw

#

,rotate 180

woven radishBOT
fervent terrace
#

I got it wrong again

solid perch
#

incorrect.

#

you forgot that you have to pay $2 to even play the game to start.

fervent terrace
#

I put -2 on the end

solid perch
#

that does not correct for the squaring done inside the summation.

#

so your net gain must take into account this upfront payment from the start.

fervent terrace
#

Oh yes X=-2

#

I'm the case of loss

solid perch
#

yes.

fervent terrace
#

i keep getting variance as 5 or 7

solid perch
#

show your work.

fervent terrace
solid perch
#

you correctly accounted for the loss, but the payouts in the first two events are still too big.

#

where's the 4 coming from?

#

in the event you win $4, you should only have gained $2 because you paid $2 up front.

#

likewise with the event where you win $2, you should have gained nothing.

fervent terrace
#

ohhhh okay i see

#

i should account for all of them the same way i did for loss

solid perch
#

yes!

fervent terrace
#

do i keep the negative sign when squaring the -2

sand quarry
#

except 0, i suppose

bitter ledge
#

squaring any real number gives a nonnegative number :)

crystal dawn
#

keep it anyway

#

if only to convince yourself and potentially your examiner that you remembered negative payouts exist

devout snowBOT
#

@fervent terrace Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

half lodge
#

I’ve been struggling with finding the quadratic equation for this, I’m using an area model and have been using all the x-ints listed, but every time i put them into the area model, it never works out. which x-int should i use?

half lodge
#

the x-ints are the numbers near the middle in pencil

spiral raptor
#

Is this the x ints?

#

I would assume there would be a 1/2 too

fierce heath
#

what ints have you tried already

devout snowBOT
#

@half lodge Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

barren dune
#

Where did I go wrong?

devout snowBOT
barren dune
#

The previous part isn’t needed

#

My final answers is correct except the signs are flipped smh

hasty cargo
#

This is only part b

barren dune
graceful cosmos
#

,w integral of tan^(-1)(4x) between 0 and 0.25

graceful cosmos
#

,w 1/16 pi - 1/8 ln(2)

mild sorrel
#

I think the error is in the second last step.

graceful cosmos
#

Ah yes I see it now

#

You want upper - lower, you've got lower - upper

barren dune
#

Ohh

#

Thank you sm

lunar harbor
devout snowBOT
lunar harbor
#

(In the future, please make the first message you send the actual question since that's what the bot pins. This saves us the effort of having to change the pin manually.)

devout snowBOT
#

@barren dune Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @barren dune

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

neon wagon
#

so ive got this

devout snowBOT
neon wagon
#

and f(x) = x^3 -4x

#

so

#

this is really tricky

#

can i just say that the function h is

#

between the origin and f

#

but i gotta prove this somehow

alpine python
#

you should show that the midpoint satisfies the equation h(x)

#

and you can use the information that P satisfies the equation f(x)

alpine python
#

that means you can do a substitution with h(x)

faint gorge
#

-# erfüllt die Gleichung

neon wagon
#

so

#

but what equation

alpine python
#

you can use some variables, like say that P is (a,b)

#

you know some information about (a,b) and you also can figure out the midpoint

neon wagon
#

hmm

#

can i just pick some random point

#

bcs i have a material with the sketch

#

of f(x)

alpine python
#

you can just pick a random point to help visualize it and stuff

#

but the argument needs to work for all points

neon wagon
#

hmmmm

#

let me write some stuff

alpine python
#

ok

neon wagon
#

wait can i say

#

f(x/2) = h(x)

alpine python
#

i think you want (1/2) f(x/2) = h(x)

neon wagon
#

but i was close

alpine python
#

ye

neon wagon
#

but what did you mean by P(a,b

neon wagon
alpine python
#

the midpoint will be half as high as f(x)

#

i mean, half as high as P

#

the (a,b) thing was my way of trying to think carefully about the problem

#

but what you said is fine

neon wagon
#

but wait shouldnt it be h(x/2)

#

because

#

or no

#

nope

alpine python
#

oh

#

(1/2) f(x) = h(x/2)

neon wagon
#

i basically did this rq

neon wagon
alpine python
#

try this, pick some x and plot it on f(x)

#

and plot the midpoint, which will be (x/2, f(x)/2)

#

so (x/2, f(x)/2) needs to be on h

#

being on the graph always means h(the first thing) = the second thing
like if (a,b) is on the graph of h, that means h(a) = b

#

so (x/2, f(x)/2) being on h, means the same thing as h(x/2) = f(x)/2

neon wagon
alpine python
#

the midpoint is the point halfway from the origin to P

neon wagon
#

oh so the y value is also halved?

alpine python
#

yeah

neon wagon
#

oh thats why u said 1/2?

alpine python
#

in the image you can see "divided by 2" on both of the coordinates

#

yeah

#

the y value of the point P is f(x)

#

P is at (x, f(x))

neon wagon
#

damnnn crazy

#

wait do i have to solve some stuff too or nah

alpine python
#

once you reach this point: (1/2) f(x) = h(x/2)
then you have to solve some stuff

#

to show that both sides of that equation are the same

neon wagon
#

ok ill try

alpine python
#

ok

neon wagon
#

wait

#

cant i just plugin x/2 for h

alpine python
#

yeah

neon wagon
#

thats proof

alpine python
#

yeah because that's half of f(x)

#

do you see what i mean?

#

that's equal to (1/2) f(x)

neon wagon
#

but i hope i can do problems like theseon myown i just cant

alpine python
#

you might need to remember the midpoint formula

devout snowBOT
#

@neon wagon Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @neon wagon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

whole wave
#

Gang can someone explain this me i cant understand for some reason💔

whole wave
#

Why did they put dx/du there

dull parrot
#

what part do you not understand?

whole wave
#

Already the first part

dull parrot
#

they basically did something called a u substiution

whole wave
#

Bro its confusing me😔

dull parrot
#

they differentiate with respect to d/dx to du/dx = 8x^3

#

once they did that

#

they rearranged dx to make it the subject

#

to get du/(8x^3) = dx

#

you can substiute that in into your dx

flat bronze
#

2999 - 3000 + 1

dull parrot
devout snowBOT
whole wave
dull parrot
#

yeah that would probably be better

#

We will talk about what u-substitution for integration is and its connection to the chain rule for differentiation. This is a basic introduction to integration by u-sub. This is a tutorial for calculus 1 students. If you want more integral practice?
Here are 20 examples on "How to choose the u": https://youtu.be/fYTJkkCyl4s

just calculus tuto...

▶ Play video
whole wave
#

🥰

dull parrot
dim perch
whole wave
#

Im doing their example rn

#

I jope bro explains well

dim perch
whole wave
#

I feel like i can do the questions but i dont actually understand it😔

#

Like what actually is „dx” and how come you can jusy do that with it🙏

dim perch
#

or what it represents?

whole wave
dim perch
#

well without delving into too much detail (unless you want it), dx just refers to the variable we are differentiating/integrating with respect to

whole wave
#

But how come u can just do du=4dx ir whayver

dim perch
#

well, when we're doing u-sub, we may rewrite a function of x in terms of u, provided that we may also rewrite du in terms of dx

#

as a simple example, consider $\int(x + 1)^{10} dx$

woven radishBOT
#

blanketism

dim perch
#

we could multiply out x + 1 10 times, but that's a lot of algebra im sure we don't want to do

#

so what we do instead is we can do u-sub

#

i'll give you this one so i can explain it, but we may first set u = x + 1

#

what happens when i differentiate/take the derivative of u with respect to x? i.e., what is du/dx?

#

<@&268886789983436800>

whole wave
#

Oh wait ive done questions like this before we hust didnt use u

#

😭

dim perch
#

im sure you have

whole wave
#

Wait im fonna write ut down

#

So its just a longer way to wtite it

dim perch
#

id like to say that that's a shorter way of doing the problem since we dont have to multiply out x + 1 10 times lol

whole wave
#

when i got du=dx i was like what😭

dim perch
#

yeah, its more or less a trivial substitution

#

just wanted to stick with something simple for you to see it a little better

whole wave
#

Yeah ok🥰

dim perch
#

anyways

#

a more practical problem would be something like $\int\sin(x^2 + x)(2x + 1) dx$

woven radishBOT
#

blanketism

whole wave
#

Then would u=x^2+x?

dim perch
#

correct!

#

what would du be?

whole wave
#

Ohh

#

Wait

#

I cant think unless i write it down🥀

dim perch
#

no worries, that looks good!

whole wave
#

It’s still weird that u can multply and divide by dx or du

dim perch
#

technically you cant :)

#

but its an abuse of notation

whole wave
#

Thats why it confuses me💔

dim perch
whole wave
#

You can try to explain to me🙏

dim perch
#

okay, sure

#

we claim the following:

$$\int f(g(x))g'(x) dx = \int f(u)du\big|_{u = g(x)}$$

woven radishBOT
#

blanketism

dim perch
#

to see this, we use the chain rule. let $F$ be a function such that $F' = f$ i.e., the derivative of $F$ is $f$. then $(F \circ g)' = (f \circ g) \cdot g'$

woven radishBOT
#

blanketism

whole wave
#

Wdym by the circle symbol

dim perch
#

composition

#

$(f \circ g)(x) = f(g(x))$

woven radishBOT
#

blanketism

whole wave
#

Ok then

#

Never seen that🙏

dim perch
#

its more or less saying that if you see the derivative of some function, we may integrate with respect to that function

#

in the sin example i provided, we saw that the derivative of $x^2 + x$ was present, i.e., $2x + 1$ so we may rewrite the integrand in terms of $u = x^2 + x$

woven radishBOT
#

blanketism

whole wave
dim perch
#

lol its okay

whole wave
#

I think i kidn of understand

#

Well ty bro for explainibg🥰

#

Im gonna sleep now

devout snowBOT
#

@whole wave Has your question been resolved?

whole wave
#

Mb gang i forgot

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @whole wave

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ionic jasper
#

yo guys, how do i Calculate the distance of point P from the line g

devout snowBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
ionic jasper
#

1

trail eagle
#

Intuitively, this distance should be the length of the vector going from P to a point on the line g perpendicularly.

#

Like in the 2D case.

#

Write down the parametric equation of a line going through P and a generic point in the line g Q(lambda).
This new line has a certain direction vector. Your goal is to pick lambda such this direction vector and the direction vector of g are orthogonal.

#

Then your distance will be PQ.

ionic jasper
#

okay 1 sec

#

i dont get it

trail eagle
#

Which part?

ionic jasper
#

Write down the parametric equation of a line going through P and a generic point in the line g Q(lambda).

#

idk what exactly to do

#

problem is also the translation, which i gotta do on every 2nd word

devout snowBOT
#

@ionic jasper Has your question been resolved?

faint gorge
#

oh nvm azy already helping

trail eagle
#

I'll try a bit but you might explain it better than I do

trail eagle
woven radishBOT
#

Azyrashacorki

trail eagle
#

You want this vector PQ(lambda) to be orthogonal to the direction vector of g.

ionic jasper
#

oh mb i didnt saw

#

the messages

#

i am not sure but is it meant like this ?

#

and then u do something with skalar product

#

like so

trail eagle
#

Yes essentially

#

So first I would write down what this vector PQ(lambda) looks like.

#

Then you can use the dot product of PQ(lambda) with the direction vector of g.

#

We want this to be 0.

#

So this will give you an equation involving lambda.

#

This lambda that you find then will give you the point on g which is closest to P.

ionic jasper
#

ye i understand now

#

thanks

#

.clsoe

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ionic jasper

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cerulean ruin
#

(l) ${f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}: f$ is strictly increasing, i.e., $f(x) > f(y)$ whenever $x > y }$.

woven radishBOT
cerulean ruin
#

cardinality of this 🙂

#

any properties of rational?

#

instinct says c^aleph_0

#

wait maybe. not

dim perch
cerulean ruin
#

but i am not 100% sure what peroperties i should use

dim perch
#

yeah theres so many 💀

cerulean ruin
dim perch
#

i may think its just $\mathfrak c$ since we can have countably many points of discontinuities?

woven radishBOT
#

blanketism

cerulean ruin
#

so can we make

#

uniquely identify a strictly incresing function

#

like before

#

(with continuous functions)

#

by a set of rationals

dim perch
#

i believe so

cerulean ruin
#

o rlly

dim perch
#

or rather, in the sense that we can associate the countably infinite jump discontinuities with a rational?

cerulean ruin
#

there gotta be a specific difference

#

ye

#

so maybe we look at limit from both sides

#

for each rational values

#

like limx->3-f(x) = 10 but limx->3+f(x) = 20

#

so we just consider both valuyes?

#

then its the same thing

#

idk

dim perch
#

hmm i think we wouldnt have to examine the limits, but just counting would be fine

#

i.e., for any jump discontinuity over some interval, just pick a rational in that interval (may also be a point)

cerulean ruin
#

hm

#

for the middle interval we just pick a rational?

#

and thats uniquely determinedd

#

bc

#

since the function is stirctly increasing

#

once a raitonal value is "picked" it will never be selected again?

dim perch
#

i don't think its uniquely determined

#

just some rational in the interval will do due to density

frosty crescent
#

wait is c^c = c or is that independent of zf(c)

dim perch
frosty crescent
#

yeah what i guessed

cerulean ruin
#

mb

#

but

dim perch
#

c^c = (2^n)^c = 2^c = c?

cerulean ruin
#

the set of picked vaues

dim perch
#

i guess

cerulean ruin
#

will give us a unique increasing function?

#

actually

#

probably not necessarily

dim perch
#

not necessarily no

#

though i guess we could construct as such

frosty crescent
#

i'm quite sure that a function that is strictly increasing should be continuous a.e.

#

fact check me on that

cerulean ruin
#

so why are we selecting a single rational?

cerulean ruin
#

idts

#

wait

#

maybe i am dumb

frosty crescent
#

and clearly we can make a strictly increasing function with countably many discontinuities

cerulean ruin
dim perch
cerulean ruin
#

oh ok

#

yes

#

that makes sense

frosty crescent
#

but iirc there are uncountable sets with zero lebesgue measure so idk

cerulean ruin
#

but now

#

we want to probably make an injection from increasing functions -> {f: Q ->R} right

frosty crescent
#

there's a quite canonical one

#

let (a1, a2, a3, ...) be a convergent sequence of increasing rational numbers to a limit r

#

then (f(a1), f(a2), f(a3), ...) should also be monotone

#

claim: the sequence is bounded above

#

proof: take any rational number q greater than r, sequence is bounded above by f(q)

#

so (f(a1), f(a2), f(a3), ...) has a limit by monotone convergence theorem

#

let this limit be f(r)

cerulean ruin
#

analkysis 😩 its been a year haha

frosty crescent
#

ofc check well definedness lol

cerulean ruin
#

hmm

frosty crescent
#

you can also claim that there is an injection from that set you described above to f : Q -> R i think

cerulean ruin
#

i was thining of doing solemthing like that

frosty crescent
#

actually idk about that

cerulean ruin
#

if i have a way of uniquely identifying a increasing function by a set of rational numbers

frosty crescent
#

but the construction above should give some inspiration

cerulean ruin
#

then i can make an injection right

#

ic

frosty crescent
#

yeah

cerulean ruin
#

for some rational x

frosty crescent
#

yeah i think the construction i gave above admits the left limits but not the right thinkies

cerulean ruin
#

ohh

#

but i guess you would do something very similar to right limits

frosty crescent
#

yeah probably

cerulean ruin
#

find a lower bound?

#

ykk what this is my problem set

#

imma just bs that

#

🤣

#

then for the lower bound

#

i csn just use the set of linear functions

#

which is pretty straight forwards c

frosty crescent
#

actually show that the construction above probably uniquely identifies strictly increasing functions

frosty crescent
#

ye

#

that is, restricting any strictly increasing function f : R -> R to Q gives a function with the "left limit" f

#

idk if this is true tho

cerulean ruin
#

ah

#

my brain hurts

#

😔

#

ill have to read into this a bit

#

🤣

frosty crescent
#

actually it may be false

#

take a function defined by

#

$f(x)=\begin{cases}x&x<\sqrt2\x+1&x\ge\sqrt2\end{cases}$

woven radishBOT
#

nAdat12

frosty crescent
#

since sqrt2 is irrational the restriction may not admit f as a left limit idk

cerulean ruin
#

hmmm

#

alr

#

😭

#

maye

#

mmaybe ngl

frosty crescent
#

actually they're kinda close enough in a sense

cerulean ruin
#

i tink so

frosty crescent
#

maybe mod out by "admit the same left limits"?

#

the hard part is that this may not have the same cardinality hmm

cerulean ruin
#

i think i am cooked haha

#

next i have to do some sort of induction regarding beth umbers

frosty crescent
#

rah

cerulean ruin
#

🗿

#

.sovled

gloomy aurora
#

its actually .close or .solved

cerulean ruin
#

let me just close this ig

#

i gave up on that problem since i dont have to provide a strict proof

#

so maybe providing intuition is enough

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @cerulean ruin

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sleek gull
#

Guys I want to know that how we k> sinx at last step was written k>1

sleek gull
potent dirge
sleek gull
#

Yes it’s tangent should be >1

#

That’s mean the derivative of the function

#

Right?

potent dirge
#

f’(x) > 0

#

The derivative just has to be non-negative

sleek gull
#

Tangent and derivative aren’t the slope of the f(x)

potent dirge
# sleek gull Isn’t it what I said

You said the derivative had to be grater than 1. Which, is technically true. A derivative greater than 1 would be increasing. But we say for a function to be increasing, its derivative has to be greater than 0

#

So, what you do, is you take you’re derivative, and create the inequality

#

If you start with

“kx + cos(x”

Then you’d get:

k - sin(x) > 0

#

Were you able to get to that step ok?

sleek gull
#

Yes

sleek gull
potent dirge
#

We’re gonna first figure out where it’s equal to 0, and then plug numbers on either side, to check if they’re positive, or negative

#

It’ll make more sense once we do it

sleek gull
#

Like this ?

frank musk
#

Umm ig he wanna know smthing else

sleek gull
#

Then we will put both the values and check which one holds true ?

#

Ig I am wrong

frank musk
potent dirge
sleek gull
#

It means we take intersection

frank musk
sleek gull
#

That will give k>1 .

frank musk
potent dirge
frank musk
sleek gull
#

Okk

potent dirge
sleek gull
#

1

potent dirge
# sleek gull 1

So, in order for you to be greater than sin(x) always…..

#

What do you have to be bigger than to guarantee that?

#

K would have it be greater than 1 to be greater than sin(x) everywhere

sleek gull
#

Oo

#

Now it’s clear

#

Thanks

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sleek gull

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sleek gull
#

How the rate is 7.5 not 2.5km/h

devout snowBOT
sleek gull
#

We clearly see that ds/dt is 2.5km/h then why we add dl/dt

summer summit
#

and the tip is at distance l + s

sleek gull
#

I guess we are adding it because as the man moves the shadow also moves

#

Isn’t it

summer summit
#

yes exactly

sleek gull
#

Ok

summer summit
#

because when the man moves, the shadow length grows and the tip moves

sleek gull
#

Yeah

#

I got it

#

Thanks

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sleek gull

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

summer summit
#

of course!

sleek gull
#

Bruh can you tell me what is this ds/dt here

#

Like if the question wanted to ask ds/dt then what It would have asked

#

.reopen

devout snowBOT
sleek gull
versed glacier
#

differenciation of s with respect to time

shy osprey
sleek gull
shy osprey
#

as in the rate of change of length of the shadow

sleek gull
#

So the rate of change of length of shadow and the rate of change of tip of the shadow aren’t the same

versed glacier
#

to summarize, It's the instantaneous velocity

shy osprey
#

The qsn would have been asking at what rate does the length of the shadow change

shy osprey
#

rate of change of tip of shadow is d(l+s) / dt

sleek gull
#

Ok

devout snowBOT
#

@sleek gull Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

amber bone
#

is every even function with co-domain of real numbers an into function?
and is this opposite for odd functions or there is no correlation at all?
if not what are some examples ?

gloomy aurora
#

did you mean onto?

solid perch
#

is "into" just another term for injective?

amber bone
uncut crow
gloomy aurora
amber bone
solid perch
#

that's fine. let's see.

#

what's your definition of evenness of a function?

gloomy aurora
#

consider

amber bone
#

f(-x)=f(x)

gloomy aurora
#

$$f(x) =
\begin{cases}
\ln(x) & \text{if } x > 0 \
0 & \text{if } x = 0 \
\ln(-x) & \text{if } x < 0
\end{cases}$$

solid perch
#

cool. now what's a function you can come up with that is even?

#

keep it simple.

woven radishBOT
#

Annie Maqionde

amber bone
#

mod?

solid perch
#

okay, let's use the absolute value function f(x) = |x|.

amber bone
#

yes

solid perch
#

is this non-surjective?

gloomy aurora
amber bone
solid perch
#

there you have a counterexample for your first question.

amber bone
#

no

#

im sorry

solid perch
#

hm?

amber bone
#

but i asked if all

#

is every even function with co-domain of real numbers an into function?

gloomy aurora
amber bone
#

here into

#

as

#

in

#

non surjective

gloomy aurora
#

usually for all the functions you'll encounter at school it is true.

solid perch
#

oops, my bad.

amber bone
solid perch
#

but I can produce another CE either way (f(x) = x^2 sin(x^2)), so the conclusion still stands.

gloomy aurora
#

it's not true generally, but at your level of education it may be accepted to be true

sand quarry
solid perch
sand quarry
#

Ok

solid perch
#

so now onto your second question.

gloomy aurora
solid perch
#

what's your definition of an odd function?

amber bone
amber bone
solid perch
#

fantastic. now take a look at f(x) = sin(x) and tell me if it is odd, and if it is surjective.

gloomy aurora
#

hint: consider trigonometric functions such as arctan, or tanh, or sin, cos, etc. they're odd. are they surjective?

gloomy aurora
solid perch
gloomy aurora
#

by functions, we don't imply continuity. As I've mentioned earlier, at your level of education, we may the first property holds.

amber bone
gloomy aurora
solid perch
gloomy aurora
#

if not R, then you can always construct a codomain such that the function is surjective in it(usually, again)

solid perch
#

the range of sin is [-1, 1], yes. but again, your codomain is R.

gloomy aurora
#

So the first property holds usually, the second, not, if your codomain is R.

amber bone
#

so it will be non surjective?

solid perch
#

well, does sin(x) hit any value outside [-1, 1]?

amber bone
#

no

solid perch
#

there you have it.

amber bone
#

ohh

#

thank you sm it helped a lot

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @amber bone

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

inner thistle
#

F_yeet = ((m * a + kx) * J^2) / R

#

. open

#

how to open

#

i want a pic for the equation

#

how to open

solid perch
inner thistle
#

ok ty

#

wont work

solid perch
devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dim perch
#

Prove that if $N$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ then $n_p(G/N) \leq n_p(G)$.

woven radishBOT
#

blanketism

dim perch
#

i might just be tired, but im lowkey kinda tweakin

#

preliminary ideas are to take a mapping from $\text{Syl}_p(G) \to \text{Syl}_p(G/N)$ but other than that, idek

woven radishBOT
#

blanketism

dim perch
#

or maybe the natural projection would do something here

#

only reason id like to work with this mapping is that showing surjectivity would be what i want

cerulean ruin
#

my goat 😔 hope someone can help u soon

dim perch
#

actually wait, i think i got it. if pi is the natural proj homomorphism, need to show |G/N : pi(P)| is coprime to p. |G/N : PN/N| = |G : PN|.

|G:P| = |G:PN||PN:P| so that |G:PN| divides |G:P| which is then coprime to p, hence pi(P) is in syl_p(G/N) hence map is well defined.

then surjectivity is sort of trivial right? for some $\bar Q \in Syl_p(G/N)$, then there exists $\bar g \in G/N$ such that

woven radishBOT
#

blanketism
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

dim perch
#

oops

#
Let $\pi$ denote the natural projection homomorphism. We need to show that $|G/N : \pi(P)|$ is coprime to $p$. Using the Second Isomorphism Theorem, we see that
\[|G/N : PN/N| = |G : PN|\]
Since $P \leq PN \leq G$, then $|G :PN|$ divides $|G:P|$ which is coprime to $p$, hence $\pi(P) \in \text{Syl}_p(G/N)$.

To show that $\phi$ is surjective, let $\bar Q \in \text{Syl}_p(G/N)$. By definition, there exists some $\bar g \in G/N$ such that
\[\bar Q = \bar g\bar P \bar g^{-1} = \pi(gPg^{-1})\]
By definition, $P \in \text{Syl}_p(G)$ implies taht $gPg^{-1} \in \text{Syl}_p(G)$, hence $\phi$ is surjective. The result follows.
#

?

woven radishBOT
#

blanketism

dim perch
#

aight nvm i got confirmation, we chillin

#

ty

#

.solved

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dim perch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.