#help-27
1 messages · Page 426 of 1
but B has to be real
I may not even be right
which yr UG r u in?
even is right
This is why I thought n must be even. You can have imaginary numbers properties with even-sized matrices, like $A^2=-I$ is possible for $n=2$
SWR
honestly i can't see how this is related to n being even
suppose $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $B$. then $\lambda^2 + \lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $B^2 + B$, which means $\lambda^2 + \lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $B$
Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)
yes yes
in other words, $\lambda$ being an eigenvalue means $\lambda^2 + \lambda$ is also an eigenvalue
Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)
,.
this is potentially bad becuase you're only allowed finitely many eigenvalues
I graduated forever ago
oh damn
like if 1 is an eigenvalue so is 2, and then so is 4 + 2 = 6, and then so is 36 + 6 = 42, ...
ok sure
so we need cyclicity
basically
yeah
I'm guessing you can only do this with complex eigenvalues 
thats true but its also kinda handwavy?
yeah i think you can use this to show that $B$ cannot have any real eigenvalues
Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)
i think this is correct
I suppose you can find cyclic eigenvalues by solving $a+b=\lambda$ and $a-b=\lambda^2+\lambda$?
SWR
where do those 2 eqns come from
wait eigenvalues of B have to purely imaginary right?
the obvious set of equations is x^2+x=y, y^2+y=z, z^2+z=t, t^2+t=w, ... until a^2+a=x. for some number of variables
I'm assuming $\lambda$ needs to be a complex number like $a+bi$, but I'm keeping it super generic and trying just $\lambda=a+b$ where $a$ and $b$ could be comples numbers
SWR
this is better
for $n=2$, you can do just $\lambda_1^2+\lambda_1=\lambda_2$ and $\lambda_2^2+\lambda_2=\lambda_1$
SWR
oh nvm they wudve if there was no +x term rifht?
I think the right idea here is considering the eigenvalues need to be cyclic. Maybe the next question is to ask yourself is what happens to the cyclicity if n is odd
well the thing is that if $n$ is odd
Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)
||B has to have at least one real eigenvalue||
you should try to show that for n=2 you cannot have real solutions. that approach immediately generalizes
y wud that be a problem tho?
because i think you can show ||B cannot have any real eigenvalues||
isn't 0 a possible eigenvalue?
which works in this example
why though?
given in the problem
oh i missed it
yea but how do u take it from here
x^2+x=y, y^2+y=x. show that this has no nonzero real solution
yea this is fine
preferably not by bruteforce computing and instead by something that might generalize
oh
||i think that using trace helps with showing no real numbers except 0 can be eigenvalues||
oh yeah thats also nice
using trace we get that tr(B^2) = 0
trB is sum of its eigenvalues, right?
diagonalize
yea when u diagonalize, the trace of the diagonal matrix is equal to the sum of the eigenvalues of the diagonal matrix right
and since say D = PBP^-1
D and B are similar
but wait
that still doesnt say anytg abt trB and the eigenvalues of B
the trace is invariant! super nice property
so are the eigenvalues right?
precisely
Trace has the nice property that Tr(AB) = Tr(BA)
ok so now tr(B) is equal to the sum of its eigenvalues
but this feels like its true for any matrix
also how does it help in showing thhat B cannot have real eigenvalues?
it is true for any matrix that is diagonalizable
So when doing PBP^{-1} you get that Tr(PBP^-1) = Tr(BP^-1 P) = Tr(B)
or actually for any matrix I think
well jordan form is enough
and how do we know if its diagonalizable?
so as long as you are working over a field or integral domain you are good
yes true
there are some neat matrices that are diagonalizable
symmetric, orthogonal
but these are special cases
so in this q how do we know B is diagonalizable?
in general you have to find a full basis of eigenvectors
it feels like we've digressed very far
n= 1 is not possible because the eigenvalue has to be zero
riight
yes
this is an interesting problem
for n = 2 the eigenvalues are imaginary
and thats completely fine
for n=3 if i show that there has to be atleast one real eigenvalue then this caase is not possible
as then the entire set wud diverge?
right?
i mean
if we have a real eigenvalue then the number of eigenvalues wud be infinite
as if x is an eigenvalue then x^2 + x shud also be an eigenvalue
they must both have the same set of Eigenvalues,
yess
@sturdy yew Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
check the pin
yeah
we've moved away quite a bit from the original q
so lemme explain
ok'
so the set of eigenvalues for B^2 + B and B are equal
ok
Ohh okay
Should've said it earlier
mb
without this I was getting n is both even and odd
so are you familiar with eigen values?
B is real and invertible
eigenvalues of B are real or complex conjugate pairs
so
We can say
Lamda is an eigen value of b
ohhh because B is real and its characteristic eqn will have only real coeff
yesyes
mb
oof
wtf
Okayy
Closed by @sturdy yew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I have a question regarding my college algebra assignment. I tried to use the remainder zero formula or what it was and got these. I asked my professor about it and he said that I need to use synthetic division to find the remainders of zero, but after doing them in my head I can’t find any values that equal zero, so I just want to check on if I’m right on this
you are correct that there are no rational roots. why are you doing this type of algebra in college tho?
I had to retake it cause I did it back in high school but not for dual credit so I gotta do the class again
ok
you are correct yes
But thank you for clarifying!
synthetic division is good to test but if they don't produce 0 remainder -> no rational roots
Ah I see, thank you!
note that rational root theorem by itself only identifies candidates.
IF there are rational zeroes, it will be within the list generated
So do I just close this now
you can close whenever you want
you don't have to, it'll close eventually
ideally you'd close when youre certain you're done
welcome and gl with the rest !!
And don't require more assistance with the question
Closed by @stark mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Helo
If i assume that every infinite sequence doesn't have any infinite subsequence which is monotonic
What are the consequences of it
(I am trying to prove that every infinite sequence has an infinite monotonic subsequence so I am trying to prove it through contradiction
I somehow constructed that i can find 3 terms following defination of monotone given that sequence is non monotonic
( Because if sequence is monotonic it is trivial))
<@&268886789983436800>
this setup does not look right
not (every object has property X) means there exists an object that doesn’t have property X
As in
I want to prove that every infinite sequence has a infinite monotonic subsequence
For the sake of contradiction
I assumed that for any arbitrary infinite seq there is NOT a single infinite subsequence which is monotonic
the negation of that would be
there exists a sequence that has no monotonic subsequence
🤔
Oh damn
Forming a negation should be a common sense or there are rules laid for it?
Yeah so, what are the consequences if i assume this so I can go further
or just practice and the ‘rules’ will be natural and make sense
......
@uncut crow hey
instead of doing this you could try to construct a monotone subsequence of an arbitrary sequence
Hmm 🤔
@gray prawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Are there any errors to my answer to part b?
I'm sorry if the handwriting is a little hard to understand, i was writing fast.
Seems like a fitting counter-example
Thanks for confirming, I have one more question relating to this topic but its a different question should I continue using this help channel or occupy another one?
Keep this one
Alright, why did they use (x+5)^2 here for?
I really struggle with these types of prove questions, because I don't even know where to begin when writing my answer.
The way they wrote the proof I think makes it clear what they want to show, but I don't think it's a very natural thing you'd think about right away when seeing the problem.
I think the easiest way to go about it would be to expand (x+6)^2 as x^2 + 12x + 36 and try to separate 2x + 11 from it, so that you get x^2 + 10x + 25 + 2x + 11.
Then you'd spot that the first three terms are just (x+5)^2 and go from there.
Another way would be to show the equivalent statement that (x+6)^2 - 2x - 11 >= 0 for all x, which would probably even be more straightforward by expanding.
Again I think the solution you're given is kind of working backwards with the solution in mind already
Okay you're right if i expand out (x+6)^2 and bring all the terms to one side I get (x+5)^2, but how do i go from there?
this is gonna sound weird but i'm not entirely sure what the question is asking
if (x+5)^2>0 hasn't that already proved that x is greater than 0?
Well (x+5)^2 >= 0 is true for any x. Anything squared is >= 0.
yeah thats true
In general, one method of showing that a >= b is to show that a = b + (something)^2. This is what they're using in the proof
a is (x+6)^2 and b is 2x+11 right?
Yes
I see, do you have time for one more question? I don't wanna be a bother.
Go on
where tf did a^2 come from in the answer sheet?
They didn't ask to square anything or imply to square anything and the original equation didn't have any square or square roots in it
They multiplied both sides of the inequality by a
Yeah
and we know (a-1)^2>=0 is true because anything squared is always positive?
Yes
Closed by @noble mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This might not be a math question, but I need help searching for an article. The article I search for is "Jagers (1975): Branching Processes with Biological Applications". I somehow only found reviews to that article but not the article itself.
Additional: Do you have any general advice on finding articles like that?
Are you sure about the author
The only article I can find with this name is Wu (2010)
I'm not, I just found it as reference in my professor's notes for possible bachelor thesis and wanted to check it
The article you're looking for is simply titled Branching Processes
Or at least that's what it looks like
<@&268886789983436800> ??
Thanks, do you have link to it?
I know this says 2005 but
This is the link I got from an article linking to the 1975 version
Not sure what's up with that
Maybe this is an updated version of the old article
The emote I'm about to send has nothing to do with this channel
🏴☠️
I just really like this emote
.close
Closed by @bitter dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i genuinely have no idea how to evaluate this
Change of variable
(aka substitution)
I mean, it's not necessary but I believe it helps you see what to do next
example of this is basically u-sub in integrals right
u = particular equation in the integral
Is this just finding the limits
yes
Can you use algebraic manipulation, no?
But you should have seen it also with basic polynomials (or other functions), such as solving x⁴ + x² - 2 = 0, where you usually let u = x²
y = x^2, y^2 =x^4
so in this case, x = t + 2
i assume,
Alberto Z.
x approaches -2
Careul 😉
right
0
Alberto Z.
Can you see what we could do next?
In particular, we have an abs value which means we will have to study two cases, do you agree?
omg slr, i had to eat a bit
yes
cause abs val a negative and positive results in positive
but how do we do that
do what?
how do we study this
oh
i get why but i dont know how if that makes sense
Dw, I went eating too lol
Well, the two cases will be right- and left side limits
evaluate the left and right limit as x-> 0^- and x->0^+
but wouldnt that be 0/0 ?
-# off to you alberto
Yes, but you can easily figure out the result, if you recall the definition of the absolute value
,tex .abs def
Alberto Z.
so lim x -> 0- = -x, lim x -> 0+ = x
Somehow yeah
$$\lim_{x\to 0^+}\ \frac{x}{\vert x \vert} = \lim_{x\to 0^+}\ \frac{x}{x}$$
Alberto Z.
$$\lim_{x\to 0^-}\ \frac{x}{\vert x \vert} = \lim_{x\to 0^-}\ \frac{x}{-x}$$
Alberto Z.
can we say then that the limit technically DNE because lim x -> 0- != lim x -> 0+ ?
right?
Exactly! That's the correct conclusion, very well 💪
Because the limit is 1 from the right but -1 from the left
Closed by @summer harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, I need help in doing this Q
so far, I already proved that the sequence is increasing, andd i just need to prove that it is bounded above
Hello!
then I can say the sequence converges
hello good sir
im stuck in proving its boundedness from above
any idea?
Use lim?
Have you found possible limits?
but shouldn't we prove that it converges first
are we doing induction
Yes, but not now
Ye
We don't find the limit
what does this mean
We find the possible values for limits
yea its -2 and 1
This simply tells you that if the sequence converges, the limit is either -2 or 1
We haven't figured out that the limit is -2 or 1, and most definitely not that it's both
okay
To prove boundedness
so L must be 1
Simply compute the first few terms
You notice, as proven, they are increasing
But it seems like they are always above 0
And this is where we can use the possible limit 1
sorry?
the thing is, I have proven that the sequence is increasing, and given the possible limits are 1 and -2, and x_1 = 0.4, limit must be 1
hmm I see
Since for the first terms of x you see it go positive
No
Induction use here
All that can be true, but still limit wouldn't necessarily have to be 1 (or -2)
ah so base case would be finding x_1 and see if x_1 < 1 is true right?
ok hold on now im confused
Base case is 0.4
yessir
You find 2 L values, one is -2 other is 1, by intuitively find some x values, you see the sequence tend to go up positive, therefore, try to show 0<xn<1
Then by inductive, use the given formula
You have proven it is increasing. You have found two possible limits, one of which must be the limit if the sequence converges. You haven't proven boundedness yet, hence you haven't proven convergence, hence the existence of a limit is still not proven
All you have to do is prove boundedness from above, you have proven boundedness from below by proving it is increasing and that x_1 = 0.4, hence all are > 0
The reason why we find possible limits is to prove this boundedness
I SEEEE
We find two values, -2 and 1
I understand it now
And what they mean is if the sequence reaches them, it stays there
So from that we know if the sequence ever reaches 1, it stays there
wait lemme share my answer
We don't pick -2 because see know all terms are > 0
So we work with 1
To show it is a good upper bound
Once we do that, we have shown convergence
so its like an educated guess
Why dont you let possible limit be solved first?
uhhhhhhh I wrote the first induction earlier before asking here
I haven't swapped it
does it matter tho?
Kind of, but it's really more systematic
In practice you expect it to work
I see I understand
yea need more practice
need to get used to this
sooo any suggestion for my answer? i will be diving to the last question
ill ask for help later haha
Looks fine to me i think
Yeah
Sure thing
My first year doing calculus too
Best of luck! 🙂
ur first year?
Yes first year uni
Closed by @silk panther
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

The smirk emoji👀
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
which method do i use to find the range of this thing
Have you found domain yet?
i guess it will be R - {0}
Use am gm inequality
how
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
na dw its 6 to infinity cuz i looked in the soln
but just wondering how to reach there
Am gm
jaisa ki @ daredevils_ldoe ne bola
i didnt understand how you used it
Hn bhai
Bruh ( x^2 +1/x^2 )/2 >= √(x^2/x^2) which is 1
Multiply both sides by 2
oh
Then add 4
AM>= GM for any two no.s is
(a +b )/2 >= sqrt(ab)
Yahan par if you observe, tumko dikhega ki x^2 and 1/x^2 wala term multiply hokr cancel hota hai
But suno!
ye
AM GM inqequality is only for +ve numbers
We were able to apply this cuz x^2 and 1/x^2 (both are square isiliye postive)
always remember am gm and cauchy shwartz
Almost every qsn mein try karke dekha kar
Weighted am gm bhi works sometimes!!
whats weighted am gm
Abhi ineqality ka chapter nahi hua?
Closed by @silent hawk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅ Original question: #help-27 message
sure!
so this was the original q
and range of h(x) is [6, infinity)
then why is the smallest positive integer taken as 7
and not 6
closed bracket nahi hai
Bhai
open bracket hai 6 ke liye
Kuch glt kra hai
one sec i think catch hai
Huh?
inequality ki condition ke according tabhi 2 hota hai jab numbers equal hoge
How is that possible
Are haan
2 se jyada hoga
isiliye open bracket hoga
ohh
shit
true
but vo ham equal consider nahi kar sakte kya?
no because x is in the base of log
wo nahi tha point!
in g(x)
crap
Agar numbers equal hote jaise x^2 = 1/x^2 hota tbhi consider krte isko
no like i asked that why cant x^2 and 1/x^2 be considered equal here
i missed the minor detail
that x is in the base
of log
The value of base of log cannot be 1 or -1
Broo
ye i missed that detail
he prob figured that by now
you also a jee aspirant?
jee 27
thx also btw if i keep this open for a bit is it okay
idk sure ig?
Thx
april attempt ya adv?
#chill
dang gl
umm....
actually 1s
how do i find the range of this thing
√(x+7) > 0
Now add 4 on both sides
And then change them to denominator
The inequality changes
The value of index of sin must be from (-π/2,π/2)
As it is it's principal branch
So -π/2< 2fx < π/2
Huh?
cuz ive never heard/seen it anywhere before
define 2fx and then just find sin values
thats your answer
ok wait brb
least value of f(x) is 0 as x-> infinity
so f(x) is never negative
i take that back, im wrong
me too
cool
um guys
i got this
but slight issue
the 0 should be in open bracket
why tho
umm what?
<@&268886789983436800> hope you good
when does the expression become 0
oh so the expression only tends to 0?
as x gets larger
?
but never becomes 0
yes
Closed by @silent hawk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@dry robin
<@&286206848099549185>

You pinged a user instead of the role.
💀
@obtuse shell you there?
Yes, he is with us.
Yes
Okay do you still require help in this one?
What is the scale here? Is one face of the square equal to one unit? Then AB would be two units?
Right so first things first, could you send a cropped img of the qsn so as to protect your privacy!!
Yeah ig so
You need to crop it, and only show the question part. Remove everything else including the browser tabs and else.
-# for your privacy!
Alright, this is good enough.
Yeah see here, when you calc area of the left rectangle,
you cant just do 8*4
Okay
Since the left part doesnt have that small chunk in the corner included
Okay
so you would have to subtract the area of that small chunk BCD from the 8*4 area
Yeup!
Uhm no
okay lets do this step by step
whats the area of the chunk that you need to subtract?
The little square?
-# i hope u understood which chunk am talking abt
Yes
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Alright, apologies!
But no
no worried u joined tdy i see
Am I allowed to give them the approach by which I got the answer or do we need to do it in a step by step teaching way?
step by step so that the op understands it
well?
Alright.
@obtuse shell are you with us?
@obtuse shell Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
x^2 + y^2 = r^2 the equation of a circle centered at the origine.
For a circle of a radius 1 , determine the components of a vectr that origine is at the coordinate point of (0,0) and the extremity is at the trigonometric point P(pi/3)
P(pi/3) = (1/2 , sqrt3/2)
(1/2 - 0 , sqrt3/2 - 0) ?
Am i supposed to subtract (1/2,sqrt3/2) by (-1/2, -sqrt3/2) or (0,0)
P(pi/3) = (1/2 , sqrt3/2)
This is your answer. Points are vectors.
Oh ok thanks
.close
Closed by @late cave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
<@&268886789983436800>
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm having trouble in (b)
$f_n(x)$ = $\begin{cases} \left(\frac{3}{2} \right)^n x & 0≤x≤1/3\ \left( \frac{3}{2} \right)^{n-1} x& 1/3≤x≤2/3 \ \text{ something} \end{cases}$
Wai
The issue here is as n-> infty, doesn't the function on [0,1/3] diverge
isn't $(3/2)^n x$ only valid for $[0, 1/3^n]$

or am I misinterpreting what your question is
hmm, I mean f_1 and f_2 have the same domains
like uh it's all defined on [0,1/3]; [1/3,2/3]; [2/3,1]
that's what I want to know too 😭
Civil Service Pigeon
edited
hmm, so because we want the middle third of each non-constant segment
I see
well, that would work for the middle segment, but what about the first bit
The recursive step for $f_{n+1}$ references $[0,1/3]$, $[1/3,2/3]$, $[2/3,1]$, but the actual formula for $f_n$ is more granular than on just these three intervals.
Civil Service Pigeon
Noted
tbf it's quite late but I'm very confused on what your question is
is "first bit" referring to [0, 1/3]
yes
$f_{n+1}(x)=\frac{1}{2}f_n (3x)$ is basically inheriting the entire "step" structure of $f_n$ then
Civil Service Pigeon
just scaled down to half the height and one third of the width
This is the graph of $f_1$, which has one "flat middle"
Civil Service Pigeon
when you construct $f_2$ from that, the original part stays flat (aka the middle $1/3$), but the recursive rule creates \textit{new} flat parts in the middle of the first and last thirds
Civil Service Pigeon
so I flatten out the middle of the (3/2)x?
yeah sure
ooh cantor's function, one of my favorites
yeah step back and just draw some of the smaller cases first
I think you're trying to juggle too much rn
Hi Bungo
hey Wai!
Closed by @lost laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the sum of all positive integers $n$ such that $1^3+2^3+\dots+n^3\equiv 17 \mod n+5$
ihave<skissue>
ok so
n^2(n+1)^2/4=17 mod n+5
(n-(n+5))^2×(n-(n+4))^2=68 mod n+5
400=68 mod n+5
n+5|332
332=2^2×83, so >5 solutions are n+5=83, 166, 332 or n=78,161,327
n=78 and 161 works, but why does n=327 suddenly fail?
n+5|332 is necessary but not sufficient
Consider what you need mod 4(n+5)
huh wdym
In a rough sense, dividing by 4 in a congruence is only valid when gcd(4,modulus)=1
when n=327, 332 is divisible by 4
yeah
This one is infamous for trolling people because you had to plug back in to check
eugh thats terrible
actually can the check just straight up be 400/4=17 mod 332, and noticing that it just doesent work?
huh then why in the world does 161 work

unrelated but i agree with your bio rankings
yeahhhhh
ok i forgot inotation doesent work in text and not all people have the same humor as my friend group
unfortunately C will turn out to be the most useful in applied maths
ew
wait it does work
for n = 161 the modulus is 166 right
4S = 400 + 166k
k is an even number represented by 2m
2S = 200 + 83(2m) => S = 100 + 83m
if m = 0, S is congruent to 100 mod 166
if m = -1, S is 17 mod 166
voila 161 works
@solid osprey
Closed by @solid osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Very confused here
So the ideals are sets sets of cosets here, right
so I'll first want to find something this is isomorphic to , in order to make my life easier
.close
Closed by @lost laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Wai wait for other when Wai can help themselves
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why did he substiute -2 into the equation when there was already a x value inside it?
There are two y values in this equation and one x value
thats kinda confusing me
If any of the helpers need context here's the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zkCj4vgBos&list=PLquyU_6YLv6di-RCY0DD_xbrkcD_TJuMO&index=5 the time stamp is around 5:00
Check out the links at the end of the video to find playlists for questions on this same topic
You can find my AS and A Level material here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NdcJdjkNy67kIYZiCZ_Ze5xY78SAlYJt?usp=sharing
An index of IGCSE Questions arranged by topic as well as papers can be found here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iOMB...
oh nvm
he made a mistake
i kept watching and he realised it then
.close
Closed by @noble mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
lmao
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
v and ^ mean gcd and lcm? in which case p | p v q so p ^ (p vq )= p
damn mb
v is disjunction and ^ is conjunction
btw when youre on paper, write v and "^" as:
$p \vee q \wedge r$
They go in line
right
maybe distinguish the cases p / not p if that's allowed
wdym
like a truth table
Yeah, proof by truth table is pretty straight forwards
given that you only have 2 variables
I dont think you can do it with formal logic without appealing to itself
More like, with propositional logic or set theory
just logical equivalence, so right off the bat
im using
distributive
and idempotent
hmm then you probably cant do much
yeah
@summer harbor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help,
this questions seems to be solved with help of products of determinant but how?
second determinant is just the determinant of the cofactor matrix
@mellow mulch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mellow mulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i answer b
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Have they mentioned minimum height or something
i kindof got it now tbh
u get the variance of the original mean, 185. so u can get the Standard deviation of 190
nd its easy from there
idk how to close this thread
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @crystal pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am having a hard time translating this
Elentis has produced 31 times the world average for the number of professional tennis players per 100,000 residents.
yh i also do not understand what is statement 1 and 2
@night rune Has your question been resolved?
I suppose the question asks you to pick statement 1 such that it implies a chosen statement 2.
at least, that's what a cold reading tells me.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
it's 3→5
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me solve this?
,rccw
No idea what to do
Any specific part or all?
All
Well I suppose all r same how abt we do 4th part?
Right, so the first step would be two identfiy the 'r'
Ye
r would indicate the max value of the expression right?
I know how to get r ye but I have no idea what this thing is
since sin() terms max value can only be 1
Ye
wait thats fine then how do you calc r?
I let 8 equal to r cos fi
And - 6 as r sin fi
Then square both sides and add both eq
Then take r Sq common
Okay yeah!
So what did you get r as?
10
Good!
Alr
if you take -6 case, you will just get phi as -
Sure!
So if I let - 6 won't that change my answer in terms of sin (theta plus fi)
?
yeah it would
but
phi would be negative
so it would become theta + (-phi)
-phi? How
You can try!
this is correct btw
now for the calc of phi?
Yeah am not denying this
Tan fie equals b over a
Am saying when you calc phi!
Ye
When calc tan fie equal b over a will I take b as - 6 or 6
whats b and a?
Ye
if you take -6cos(theta)
then you would get a tan-1( -3/4)
which is same as -tan-1(3/4)
so thats how you get a negative phi
if you take positive as you did here
I solved this without using negative as
you just get a positive tan-1(3/4)
Oh ya
Yup correct
So calculation is fie is important here?
As the question jst asks for the sin theta plus minus fie form
and theta + (-tan-1(3/4)) is same as what you got here
as in?
phi is important yes
As the question does not ask for it
i mean you do need it for the answer no?
Ye
If I want to put it in that form
Oh u mean like exact value of phi?
Ye
Idts
but as far as i remember
3/4 gives 37 degrees
and 4/3 gave 53degrees
one of the somewhat standard values
Well thanks for clearing the doubt tho
Anytime!!
Well now would you like to try the others on your own first?
Or should we start with the others asw?
@fair canopy Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont understand conceptually vector lines and planes
what part are you confused about
Like when do I use a point as a vector to descirbe it
its better in a differentq uestion
not sure what you mean
<@&268886789983436800>
yeah why do they use A as the ditection vector
for this here?
well it specfically notes it as $\vec{AB}$ and $\vec{AC}$
MxRgD
so what we're saying is how do we get from point a to point b
but above it has 3 points
and how do we get to point a to point c
so cant tehy use bc and ba?
oh so its incorrect to describe the plane that way
ah no i meant, you get a different normal that's scaled differently
but it will be right
ohhh I okay so yiu can use any of the points to find a normal and describe the plane
and each of the normals if used other points would have a scalar factor difference betwene them
not scalar factor difference like they are scalar apart
yes, specfically if you have three points $A(x_1, y_1, z_1)$, $B(x_2, y_2, z_2)$, $C(x_3, y_3, z_3)$. You can derive two direction vectors.
MxRgD

