#help-27
1 messages · Page 418 of 1
koi hindi mein samjhayega
lmao ok
Try to think of the blue point as the arrow going from the red paper to the blue point
kaha tk samajh aaya abhi 😭😭
normal vector agaya
there are infinite of these arrows perpendicular to the red paper right
so just find the one that's in line with the point we ar trying to find
which is 5,7,1
dekh
pehle plane ka normal vector aagya
fir question me diya hai ki jo line hai vo bhi plane ke perpendicular hai
to basically line ka bhi direction vector , normal vector hi hogya
bs fir to ho hi gya
line ka point pta hai ek
oh tou matlab 2 normal vectors
does that make sense?
direction pta hai
oh han
haan mtlb ese samajh skte hai
the language shifted
uske baad to kuch ni krna
crazy
yeh basically aesa hai na keh bhot saari imaginary lines parallel ja rahi ek doosre ke but plane ke perpendicular
hain
ongad @mortal tendon
haan exactly
fr
crazy
bro said god bless u 😭😭😭😭
thanks meri jaan 🥀🥀
oh han
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@blissful comet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It seems they are applying the order of zeros theorem separetely to each term in the denominator, is it possible to apply it to the whole denominotar at once? (i.e. the whole function $\sin(\pi z) (z^2 - 1)$) to obtain the same asnwer?
Hello
LXDL
@velvet coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It's because trig functions have waves which repeat and cycle after a set value
Ooooo
In this case you have tan x
You see how it has a repeating graph?
So every 180° which is π, the graph repeats
That's why in general, you only study those functions from [-π; π] or [0; 2π]
This one is just showing you how to draw -2tanx
So since it's negative, it's symmetric to the center of the wave, and then it's srretched vertically
Wait what?
So generally, you can just plug in the last value of your wave
Remember when we said that the graph repeats?
Yes
So it starts at -90° which is -π/2 and ends at π/2
No no I mean the amplitude for this
I don’t get it
I don’t understand how it works for tan
See how the graph is going up? It reaches it's highest value at π/2, you can calculate your highest value from there
If you have a function in the form of: atanx, where a is a constant, it just expands your graph vertically, but not the wave itself
How do Ik it reached 2
Yes
I still of t get what the amplitude is for tab
Ik it’s the max and min for sine and cosien
*cosine
I don't remember ngl, but I'd assume you just input the highest value in the wave
I kind of understand
The normal one has a amplitude of one and -one
So it passes through it?
It says it there that you get a repeating cycle every 180°, it's safe to assume that tan(180°=π) is your highest value (which converges to inf)
That's for tanx at least
Altho I don't think tanx had exact values, I think it had limits approaching inf and -inf
I don’t get this
I don’t understand w the pi
180 is in degrees, π is in radians
It's just a different metric
180° = π rad
90° = π/2 rad
And so on
It's just a more common terminology
Ok
@potent compass Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @potent compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey so I have just started learning about the Sine rule, I understand it when I'm dealing with right angled trangles but I don't understand this. Is there like a formula or something to figure out the height of the triangle? Any help would be appreciated 🙂
Looks fine
they're just using the classic SOH-CAH-TOA identities, where that stands for sine = opposite/hypnotenuse, cosine = adjacent/hypotenuse, and tangent = opposite/adjacent
You need to use either sin, cos or tan that involve h
the height "h" splits the triangle into two different right triangles
Closed by @hollow crest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the answer is got is 88degree is that correct?
yes you are correct
Closed by @prime sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wait is H centre?
well i thought it was center at first glance and said yes but probably they didnt mention its not center so wouldnt be any problem ig idk
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hellooo for no 10 is this how you do it?
Range is y value
1×=1(0)=0?
any exponential function has range (0,infty)
Ouh! Okie2 thank you
Evem if the exponents is like 5 or 3 etc
?
doesnt matter the number
every function of the form a^x
is always gonna go from (0,infty)
Okay tysmm
Oh I've seen an inequalities question
Its like
Log2 (3-x)<0
Do i just plug in the 2 in the graph?
The 2 is small btw
@serene forge Has your question been resolved?
I made the graph & just plug the numbers in qwq
plug what numbers in
And since it says <0
+-+ i choose -
why 2 and 3
Because the question says log2 & 3-x so i thought u just input those numbers in the graph
nah mate
,w log inequality
log inequality works the same way
you just have to find root
and apply wavy curve method
or +-+-+ whatever
dont see this
Oh
this is trash
Oh ok
parthisjoking
Oh
2 is the base of logarithm
Is this how i write ut?
no thats square root lad
?
try using
if y<0
then a^y < a^0
A is the 2 in log?
yes
hey no
2 is the base of the log
a is taken to be 2
but a is not the 2 in the log
Y=3
But 3 is larger than 0 so its a different formula?
<@&286206848099549185>
Which question
O to 1
0*
Q10
ah, i see
This one
What's the domain of the function?
Oh I've already got that one helped
uhm yeah das right
What u gotta find ?
Whats up wid da ineuqlieyies?
Only x ?
Inequalities
Wait
X is (2,3)
The solution set of the inequality log2(3-x)<0 is ()
Indeed
First of all 3- x > 0 then
3-x < 1
How'd u get 1?
2^0 = 1
Remove the base
whyd u tell the answer straight away bro
i didn't got the question and straight up started solving
Oh so if its log the way u find it is by #^0?
oh okay, das sumn id do as well
Yeah
the goal is to put x in like one spot
Yup
Basically inverse of log
Wait2
Y = loga(x) is x = a^y
Yup
Lik this?
What's+ve 😭
Positive
More than 0
is that how usability is spelt?
thats a word?
Oh sorry, thats out of topic
.
Uhh the argument is
3-x≠0
3-x>0??? I don't get it 🥲
No it can't be 0
Ouhhh ok
Yup
Yus
But the question is 3-x 😭
My bad
It's okay
Then u were r8
Uhm what
X - 3 < 0
The symbol just flups right?
what did bro do?
Yes
Whatever is between brackets (aka argument of the logarithm) must be positive @serene forge
Ya ik
Wrong tag 😬
mugnes, what do u know about logarithms?
Oh okk thankss
Bc I've seen it become negative like
(X-3)(X-2) It becomes
(X-3) =
X-3≠0
=X=3
Etc
This is wrong as written
Or (x+3)
=X+3≠0
=x=-3
Bro dont interfere let the helpers help
Only the
Log (ab)=loga+logb
Log(a/b)=loga-logb
Etc
Yes
!xyp
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Im tryna understand how she looks at the problem
or he?
This as an example
That's how my tutor taught me
Okay and, did u know about it being the inverse of like exponents?
No..
Never heard of that 😭
Like u move it's position
Ahh
And when u do
Like from lefthand/righthand the +/- changes
Okay thats great
so f(x) is a function
u plug something into x and u get an output
the inverse would be
lets say the inverse is like g(y)
u plug something into y and u get ur input x
thats basically the point of log to like exponentials
Ahh i see2
for example
32
u wanna find out how many 2s u wanna multiply together to get 32
so u take log2(32)
and u get like, 5?
2⁵ is 32 right
2⁵ is an exponential thing
so its basically doing the opposite
u get me?
Yes
Ohh
Yeah
Ah i see
yeah
Ouhh
Log2(3-x)<0
Log2(0+3-1)?
And also notice this
Ohh okiee
uhm yeah?
interesting way of writing that down
Ah-
Lets backtrack here
log2(3-x)<0
what is ur thought process after u see that?
i just wanna see how u see it
X becomes 1 since its a variable
Exponent of 2 is 0
So we put it in the bracket
Log (3-1+0)
I assume its because we want a number for the solution
And a variable itself is equal to 1
Well u see
its an inequality
so..
ure guna hav a range of numbers
not just a number
Anyway lets plug in 1 and see what happens
log2(3-1)=log2(2)=1
and 1<0
hmmm yes
I think at this very moment, u should think of what the goal is here
the goal here is to like, just isolate x
put it on one side and all the other things put on one side
and just try ur best to do that
Wait log2(2)=1??
How
I thought its 2 because log2(2)=log4=2
Mkayy
Well uhh, whats 2s exponent hav to be so that it equals 2?
OH
oh yeah mb
do u believe this is the answer?
Not rlly ;-;
Bc i didn't move the x anywhere
🥲
Ah okay, thats a relief
So uhm, what was ur goal here?
Make the inequalities/domain
is that supposed to be x?
Lets approach this problem in a different way
log2(3-x)<0
I guess so
lets get rid of that 3-x
and solve a simpler problem first
log2(x)<0
what does x hav to be so this is true?
yeah, figure it out
Hn
oh really, theres an exponent thatll make 2 negative somehow
come on now
lets interpret this question
this is asking u to find out the numbers, such that when u turn them into 2 raised to some power, that power will be lesser than 0
and example would be 1/2
how do u get 1/2 from raising 2 to some power u may ask
2^(-1)=1/2
And -1<0
okay now analyze that interpretation
and do the problem again
log2(x)<0
But 2^1/2 is 1 not -1
No
Is it because its less than 2 Bc unlike a normal exponent the number goes down instead of up
yeah it is
I think i see why ure struggling here
i think u should study exponents and logs more, like understand them
do u know about uhm
like
like exponent addition
i forgot what it was called but basically if u hav to numbers with the same bases and u multiplied them
Oh ok
u add together the exponents
Oh yeah
so
Log(ab)=loga+logb right?
so
2^(-1) times 2
what do u think that is?
-1+1 = 0
and 2⁰ is 1
that means that 2^(-1) MUST be 1/2
u get me?
I'll just memorize that 😭
uhmm
well
first of all 1 is the half of 2
Okay wait bro
how did u learn this stuff
did u start with exponents and then logS
or logs then exponents?
Okay
@serene forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i used this method
i seated everyone in 2 rows
facing each other
and i make them shake hands with the person on their right
each time i do this
their number gets reduced to the number of handshakes that they can do now
and i partition it after a move
how do i prove that i can do this indefinitely
also
if i prove this for infinite number of couples
can it hold for 7125
i also thought about making a regular 2n-gon , idk howd that work out tho
the vertices could be handshakes maybe
I think you should use induction
how
unrelated but do u do math every day
yes
explain
the largest member from each row shakes hand with everyone from his row and the opposite sitting guy
this removes both 1 and 5
and reduces the number on everyone in between
this reduces the size of the row by 2
and the number on each guy is reduced by 1
and we can do this infinitely
to get to just 2 guys
facing each other
and in the end
they shake hands
it doesnt seem obvious to me that you can always do this
where is the problem
what case do you think can cause a problem
nvm it does work
I see it now
so the number of handshakes left on each person decreases by 1, except for the last person who is out
oh yea since its 0
but this is not a proof🥀
you can easily make this into a proof
its just "look professor i made this cool diagram"
nono
how
they do repeat what
wait
oh
maybe not
and then we get a fresh set
so this basically reduces the problem from n to n-2
yes
but recursion might help us find how many handshakes were done , or maybe how many moves it took
but it wont tell us if its possible or not
oh but
ahh
got it
if its possible for n
its possible for n+2
and since its possible for both 1 and 2
its possible for all integers
by inductions
is this correct?
yes
You dont actually need induction here its enough to just say well for every n we can keep reducing the problem to n - 2, so we will end up at n = 1 or n = 0.
but what you said is also fine
Closed by @pure cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, the method i would use to answer this would be to find f(x) f'(x) f''(x) and sub into the maclaurin seri
nvm I was high
anyways I think you use f(x), f''(x) and the 4th derivative if you are doing maclaurin
because f'(0) is 0
and ''' is also 0
how do we know secx is a even function
sec x = 1/cos x, so you could also develop 1/cos x
Because cosx is an even function
.close
Closed by @kindred mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, i am searching for a solutions book for stewart calculus 9th edition, can someone help me find one, preferably not broken like quizlet
in the future, please leave your first channel open :)
these are free-to-use solutions so i think i'm okay posting these
These are my solutions to the seventh edition of Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by Stewart.
just realized you said 9th edition and not 8th ._.
Oh ok
Yea I got the 9th edition and now I can’t find anything for it :
Don't abuse help channels for looking for illegal resources
.close
Closed by @supple knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i wasnt looking for illegal resources, i am just looking for a resource that has the answers, i want to be able to check answers to a book. it doesnt need to be free, and i never said so.
so um i still kinda need it tho
Yea still abusing help channels. It's not a math question
.close
Closed by @supple knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@bright night any resource that would have the answers is going to run afoul of copyright claims against it.
If it's not in the back of the book, then they check their answers by comparing it against other students, some professors allow this some do not, or they simply double check their work and make sure everything is solid.
For clarity, this is referring to 3rd party source of the answers. 1st party sources, i.e. the solutions manual, are restricted distribution. You generally need to demonstrate that you are teaching a course in order to get it.
You would get it directly from the publisher, typically.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-27 message
anyway, I reopened the question so it wouldn't automatically lock
while I explained this
but it really is out of scope for the help channels.
So all we can recommend, due to Discord TOS, is attempting to get the solutions manual from the publisher, but I don't believe that you'll be able to do that.
There are other ways, but not ones we can help you with here.
I'll be closing this again.
@bright night best of luck. Self study isn't easy.
maybe try #study-discussion for general methods of checking your work to ensure it is correct.
.close
Closed by @faint zinc
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
tan^-1 notation is so evil
sorry
ig u can do what u did before, apply taylor series
or lhopital
tho i think herr taylor is cooler
if you manage to get terms up to 6th degree
yes
Interesting
should i just memeorise tanx and arctan
What do you mean memorize
. is multiplication
like would it make it easier to memrise
like sinx and cosx
Uh
Sorry I have no idea what you mean 🥲
You can't just memorize the entire tanx function
probably meant the taylor expansions
remember op wants to know first step
Memorizing maths 
idk
i was given a table with taylor series for sinx, cosx
suggesting to memorise these
Oh I see
Right
Well I am not the right person for this as I have never used the Taylor expansion for tan(x) in my life
how would you solve the limit without it
Who doesn't like suffering with L'Hôpital
6 times
Closed by @kindred mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@pseudo kettle
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@fast solar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
@zenith olive Has your question been resolved?
no
@zenith olive Has your question been resolved?
Very difficult to read and understand when you don't show original question
there is a horizontal asymptote at x/x-1 = 1
just do "!xy"
can you actually say y=1 though if its not true for any x values
A series alone does not make a question
To give more context, we rn at uni are doing converges/diverges tests
Ratio test, leibniz etc
So here i should find if it converges or diverges
For two values of x
in that case your cx interval does make sense, take a look at the graph
So its all correct?
my interpretation of your notes are that cy is some desired region you want to find x values cx for which the series converges.
if so then it looks good
but you should post question to make sure
I see, thanks
@zenith olive Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you guyz help me with this
f(x) is a 4degree polynomial , f(x) = (x-2)^2.g(x) so g(x) is a secod degree polynomial
if you write g(x) = ax^2 +bx +c
f(x) = (x-2)^2(ax^2 +bx +c )
sub x = 0 you will find c
sub x = 2 and x = 0 into the second equation
One could also use f(i)
@terse jacinth Has your question been resolved?
yah you are right but when itz come to find a and b idk how to get
Use the second equation
i find a different way to solve this by using long division
this is true
yes but i guess that's the only way to solve this i already try the way to say before
So have you found c
use this you wont need g(x)
If you found c thats good
x^4 -4x^3+7x^2 -12x +12 is f(x)
may i send the way i fix it
you can if you want
and get a system of your own
but i use long divition is there any short way to get it
Have you found c
I asked 3 times
oh sorry i didnt notice c=3
too lengthy
yes
then this tells us that f(x) divide by (x^2+1) gives remainder of 6-8x
okey
then how am i able to find a and b with 2nd eq
hola i get it
yah this way is too odd
hey but there are only 2 eq we can get but there 3 known variables
then 1 eq and 2 unknown variables
we only know f(i),f(0)
using f(0) we can get c when we use f(i) we can get 1 eq to find and b then ?
@terse jacinth Are you done?
i fix it my own way but itz too long you can see how did i get my answer from here
but is there any way to fix it i mean short way
hey dude, can you tell me whats the current situation?
I think i got the answer
can you tell me the way
Yes Sir i can
Okay first of, we know that the f(x) is the polynomial of degree 4
right
yes
and in the first provided equation
it is written that
f(x) = (x² - 1)g(x)
right
yes
So can i say that the g(x) will be a quadratic polynomial
yes you are right
sure
yes
so can i sa that
simply f(2)is a factor of fx
so put 2 in that equation
f(2)= 0
good
now, what happens
if we put
zero in that equation?
what's the resulting equation
we can get the constant of the g(x) i mean if g(x)= ax^2 + bx +c then we can get the C
excellent
and the C is 3
and what if i tell you to do the same for second equation?
the m(x) one
what do we get
put zero in it
thats a problem if i put 0 for 2nd eq problem become complex dont you think
i mean in that way we have to find 6 known variables
f(x) = (x² + 1)m(x) + 6 - 8x
We just need to find f(x), why should we find g(x) ?
f(0) = m(0) + 6
oh yah sure
m(0) = 6
okey
f(2) = 5m(2) + 6 -8(2)
okey
what is m(2) ?
how can we know itz unknown one
here
oh yah okey i miss that part thx go on
tell me what's f(2)
0
find m(2) now
put f of 2 here
m(2)= 2 right?
let me calculate
yes, excellent
m(x) = x² + (something goes here)x + 6
do you get this
how can we say that x^2 why it cant be 2x^2 or something
we can divide the complete equation by coefficient of x²
you mean f(x) divid by x^2?
another way to verify is, lets us say there is some coefficient to x²
very quadratic is of form
k(factorz)
so basically
m(x) = K(stuff goes here)
nice i get it go on
okey
hmmm, this doesn't feel right
yes
but we can still cross check our answer if it is divisible by x -2
sensi i found another way to fix it please look at this
go on
wait im still writing
I think coefficient of x² is 2
you should try putting x=2 ad f(x) = 0
that way you can get a relation in A and B
we can get 1 relation but we need 2 to find both variables
Product of roots is 12, we already know 2 roots
product of rest of the two roots is 3
sum of roots is
- (2A + B) = 2 + 2 + ( other two roots)
do you know the rest of the roots are roots of g(x)
no i dont
please look at this i mean we can find a , b and both lamda and Mu using this right?
yes
that's allso a hella long way but i guess those are the only ways to fix this
looks good
haha thats crazy man
right
we can get answers by cmparing coefficients and equating them to solve for it
let me solve them that way we can check the answers are right or not
Closed by @terse jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I require assistance with this question
these are the values I managed to get but I am unsure to how you find OZ
you've gotten OS as 4.5b - 2a right?
yes
Im pretty sure oz is like x(4.5b -2a)
$\frac{(4.5b-2a)}{1+k}$ actually
MxRgD
now try to find a different path for OS and then OZ
then equate it with this so you can solve for k
like OR + RS + SZ and OQ + QS +SZ
yeah something like that
I end up getting 4.5b -2a / -2a + 4.5 b -SZ = 1+ k
I tried multiplying the 1+k by the denominator
but it gives me -2ka + 4.5 kb - kSZ = SZ
it gives me k(4.5b - 2a ) = SZ if I factorise
@dull parrot
Okay nice, so you now have OZ ans SZ
Use those two to relate them together from the ratio and solve for k
how do I do that
wdym
.close
Closed by @opaque ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would we prove it is valid for all values of x
show convergence radius is oo
and how do i do that
do you any tests for convergence
no
ratio test?
@kindred mauve Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is that supposed to be the 9th derivative of f?
nah
f(f(f(f(...(x)))..) 9 times
f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(x)))))))))
Oh yeah
Do you happen to have the roots of f?
nah it's not root
it can be factorised to x(x-3)(x-3)
It's pretty much that you want to find any value that leads to a root of f
For example 0
F(0) = 0, therefore f(f(0)) = 0
And so on
can you elaborate
So if 3 is a root, we would look for f_k(x) = 3 such that k < 9
why do we start with root and then with composite function?
You work it backwards, you start from f(x) and move all the way to f9(x)
yeah but like why find the root?
Suppose f(x) = 0 for x = { 0 ; 3} (0 and 3 are roots of f)
because x=0 is only one of the solutions for this equation
Then at any point of your function, if you achieve f(3), then that's a solution
0 and 3
it's not unfortunately
you can try
im talking about the composite function
f9
yes
yeah
and we have to find how many x to sastify that "so on"
this is what im asking for
We know that 0 is one solution for all composite functions
So we check for 3
Solve for f(x) = 3
You get some value b
Which we know that f(f(b)) =0
Cuz f(b) = 3 and f(3) = 0
And then we want to check for f(x) = b, we get some value c, then we check f(x) = c
Yup
the problem is how many
well, finding the exact b and c isnt an easy job. I put it on my calculator and they are like 3.879385242
what is the exact algorithm to calculate f9(x)
also|
what if it's fn(x)
then we can't just calculate and find the exact solutions
Check for all values that achieve
f8(x) = 0, 3
f7(x) = b, 0 or 3, such that f(b) = 3
Then f6(x)= c, b, 0, 3 such that f(c) = 3
Then f5(x) = d, c, b, 0, 3
Then f4(x) = e, d, c, b, 0, 3
Then f3(x) = f, e, d, c, b, 0, 3
Then f2(x) = g, f, e, d, c, b, 0, 3
Then f(x) = h, g, f, e, d, c, b, 0, 3
The thing is, those values get repetitive
Cuz realistically, you only need
f(x) = h, g, f, e, d, c, b, 0, 3
9 solutions
Unless there are multiple solution to for example f(x) = 3
Then that gets tedious
Idk how you can potentially achieve a formula to summarize this
Actually, we do know how many solutions approximately
Which is 3⁹
Actually no
It's 2^3^...^3, 9 times
i think we have 3^8 + 3^7 +...+3^0
that would be so many
the problem is from my practice test
none of the given A,B,C or D go past 5 digits
Think of it like this
x³ generally has 3 solutions or for the sake of accuracy at max 3 solutions
We conclude that the number of solution is at max the exponent of the biggest term
f(f(x)) gives you (x³)³ = 3^3
By extension we get 3^3^...^3
But then again we have 0 which is a general solution for all composite functions, and 3 is a double solution
