#help-27
1 messages · Page 416 of 1
Why divide it
To factor by 2
Suggestion is if x ^2 has coefficient a then factor x terms by a then do completing square in bracket
Else
$ax^2 + bx + c = a(x^2 + \frac{b}{a}x + (\frac{b}{2a})^2) + c - a(\frac{b}{2a})^2$\
$ax^2 + bx + c = a(x + \frac{b}{2a})^2 + c - \frac{b^2}{4a}$
mercy
Like this
Closed by @potent compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-27 message
what do u need help with
Number 3
Idk if u can see well
My eyesit is bad
-x^2 + 6x + 9 is NOT equal to -(x+3)^2
probably, it will make it easier to understand
But then what do I do next
so you have -x^2 + 6x = -8 right
Oh..
lol
Ty’sm
np
I’ll say splitter longer in case I need help
Can someone help me w this
Will the sign change pls
wdym sign change?
btw u factored it wrong
you can take out the negative and make the entire thing addition
x^2 -4 is NOT equal to (x-2)(x-2)
^
There’s a negative tho
it is still difference of squares
a^2-b^2 = (a+b)(a-b)
oh i see where ur confused
you tried switching 4–x^2 to x^2-4
Yes
ok well if you do that then it becomes + 2/(x^2-4)
2 / -(x^2-4)*
What if -(x-2)
i took out the subtraction made it addition
that is x+2
ah
try making common denominators
after this
Don’t I have to reduce the x^2-4
Yes
yes do that now
don’t
why?
she means factor
Oki
ah
just more steps
clearer at this level
fair
yes sure
Closed by @potent compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any ideas on how to solve?
Can you compute b-a and c-a with log rules?
what do you mean whit compute?
Like simplify
No
Like this?
,tex .log rules
Azyrashacorki
That works
There's one last thing you can do with the numerator
Noticing that 1/3 = 3^{-1}
If I remmeber correctly radicals share some methods with logs
So the rule works like this right? Sorry for being dumb, it's kinda late
Yes that's exactly it
Closed by @elfin mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question 3
"Can someone please tag the bot or send a link for the 'Bartle Real Analysis' solutions PDF? I can't find it in the search
This is occupied
Where did 36k come from?
Ok
Got it, thankie
Hello
Hi! If you need help, refer to #❓how-to-get-help to see how to claim your own channel.
That's good as well! You're free to contribute in currently open help channels.
if you wish to help, you may look around in the forum and currently occupied channels to see if any still needs help that you can help with.
OP seems to have figured it out for this problem.
Can I get help w this
For the graph ones
I understand the rules
But idk how they apply to the graphs
Well if the graph doesn't touch the x-axis it immediately has no real roots
Is that clear?
Yes pls
If there is just one intersection, then it has to be at the vertex of the parabola, and that indicates that the discriminant is 0 (then you get +- 0 in the quadratic formula, so there's only one case).
Idk this
In the quadratic formula $$x_{1,2} = \frac{-b\pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a},$$ the only way you can get 1 solution (so 1 intersection), is if $\Delta = 0$, in which case you get $$x_{1,2} = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{0}}{2a} = \frac{-b}{2a}.$$ Notice how now the too roots $x_1$ and $x_2$ you would get are the same.
Azyrashacorki
So there's only one solution, and thus one intersection
What would it look like
Like graph 3 in the first row or graph 2 in the second row
What would equal look like
Ooo
How would Ik it’s rational and equal or unequal pls
If $\Delta = 0$, then you get above that the root is $x_1 = \frac{-b}{2a}$, which is rational whenever $\frac{-b}{2a}$ is rational.
Azyrashacorki
So you can compute -b/2a and see if it is rational
The root is at -b/2a in graphs c) and e)
That root is rational if you compute -b/2a and it's rational.
Wait where did -b/2a come from
.
That is how you tell
You can't tell just from the graph without information about whether -b/2a is rational or not
Well we've just discussed the equal part.
If $\Delta = 0$, then there is a single root (so it looks like graphs c) or e)) and you tell whether the root is rational or not depending on whether $\frac{-b}{2a}$ is rational or not.
Azyrashacorki
When there is only one root, like in graphs c) and e).
Ohh ok
If the roots are not equal, that is $\Delta > 0$, then in order to get a rational root, you need $\Delta$ to be a perfect square, so that $\sqrt{\Delta}$ is an integer. In that case this automatically implies that the whole expression in the quadratic formula is rational, so your roots are rational. \
If $\Delta$ is not a perfect square, then the roots will be irrational.
Azyrashacorki
For unequal roots you need $\Delta > 0$.
Azyrashacorki
Also $a = r$, not 1
Azyrashacorki
Oh
That's good but as I said this needs to be a strict inequality to get unequal roots.
It's the same thing just get rid of the $\ge$ and replace them with $>$.
Azyrashacorki
Why Pls
To get unequal roots you need $\Delta > 0$.
Azyrashacorki
Not $\Delta \ge 0$
Azyrashacorki
Because if $\Delta = 0$ you get equal roots.
Azyrashacorki
Do I do this for all real and unequal
Yes
@potent compass Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @potent compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello,
I can help you
or occupy em
Can you read #❓how-to-get-help to understand how this works? and please only try to help when you know what you are talking about and can communicate that clearly with the people asking for help.
.close
Closed by @queen nimbus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why should there be?
A can be {15}
what is f(1) then?
A can be {22}
31
how can a function output a value not in its codomain?
A \subset N 
its not possible then right?
The range should be equal to the codomain
cuz inputs are reals
A \subset N in the question just makes no sense to me
so am i right with A being {15}
It is a quadratic
No
it tells you the domain, which is the positive real numbers
so there isnt any A for which this is true?
A will be the set of "output" values of the function
A \subset N seems like a mistake in the question
but we just cannot choose any A such that fxn becomes onto
i think that A subset N is only meant to be true for the first part? that's the only way it would make sense
actually it doesn't work even for the first part nvm
The minimum value of the quadratic to infinity will be A
damn,
lol not like exam boards never make mistakes
amen 0lante
I had set 2
but if we take A as {15}
isnt range = codomain simply
it's not even a complete sentence
find set A
IKR
amen layla
im gonna loose marks cuz of this and i hate it cuz everything else i have done correct
No because the domain is R+
probably hurried since id be pissed to elaborate if i had to type 15 pdfs
so A does not exist right?
😭😭
ill piss at cbse , if their incompetence does ts
am i right?
i thought of going modular arithmetic on ts
and i tried to find the largest A
such that every integer is possible
but since inputs are real
A should be 15 to infinity
does it not mean the codomain is a subset of N
obviously wonky notation but idk
DOES NOT MAKE SENSE DUDE
no it was necessary for part A
Cbse 💔
but omitted for part B
maybe just ignore \subset N and then it's a sensible question. who knows if it was the intended question though
wtf
no , A is the codomain, which is subset of N
I HATE TS
That would be \supset, not \subset
subset of N*
parthisjoking
it makes no sense for part A. f(pi) for example, is an expression that is supposed to parse, since the domain of f is R_+
but it does not if the codomain is a subset of N
what should i do now 💔💔💔
am i gonna loose these 5 marks
i have no idea
ok
come to the last part of the question
where we have to prove that f(a) > 7
yeah but blind cbse method gives\
$4x_1^2 + 12x_1 + 15 = 4x_2^2 + 12x_2 + 15 \implies 4(x_1-x_2)(x_1+x_2+3) = 0$\
and range of natural numbers is to invalidate the second possible equality
To find a set such that reducing the codomain to that set makes the function surjective is to essentially find the range of that function
yeah no omitted it is
the range is R+ tho
what?
its range is 15 to infty
yes
isn't the last part quite simple
if x >= 0 then 4x^2 + 12x + 15 >= 15 > 7
cbse is quite simple
yea but cbse doesnt give marks for that
you have to show it with derivatives
AND HERE THE FUNCTION IS NOT EVEN DIFFERENTIABLE
not really 🥰
we have to show them that we know a lot
lol
Closed by @pure cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, this is a question i had on a math competition for 2nd grade:
Let a,b and c be whole numbers and a≠0. What values can the discriminant have of the quadratic function:
f(x)=ax²+bx+c?
How is this 2nd grade
highschool
2nd grade in high-school? Educate me please
Anyways first intuition should be to try to make it a perfect square
i'm not sure i understand the question 
no extra conditions? , then it can take any integer supposedly
there's no restriction on the values of the polynomial, its roots, or its coefficients other than a != 0?
No I'm sure this one needs nt since they said abc are whole. Numbers probs some condition .
Radioactive 2nd graders wtf
as stated it can take the form of anything that looks like b^2 - 4ac with a,b,c natural numbers and a not 0. how else would you describe it
you can create any integer tbh
so i guess the answer must be set of all integers?
huh?
No you can't yk
hold on imma check the answer
Idts
you can't make every integer
It can't be 7
for example integers that are 3 mod 4 can't be made
Yes
the discriminant can have any value from 4Z U 4Z + 1 where 4Z = {4k : k ∈ Z} and 4Z + 1 = {4l + 1 : l ∈ Z}.
b^2 - 4ac is either 0 or 1 mod 4
thats the answer
Yeah these just use nt
oh ofc , quadratic residues
Use congruence to get restrictions then use euclids division lemma and prove or disprove the like 4 or 5 cases you get
Yeah you can start with b=1,a=1,c=1
thanks , im always looking at the one whos typing
im indian
Damn bro
Then increase c by 1 to get all 1 mod 4
And b=0 for 0 mod 4
the D of the quadratic function is D=b²-4ac
Op are you from greece
who me?
a simpler way to think is , the 4ac term will always be 0 mod 4
and b^2 can only be 0 or 1 mod 4
No but how do we confirm it covers every one of them
I get that
covers everyone what?
Every residue 0 or 1
i dont get what u are saying
Mod 4 has a property where if it's a perfect square it's 0 or 1 mod 4
every integer that is 0 or 1 mod 4 he is saying
oh
We can confirm negative ones
there arent any negatives
only whole numbers
You can make a negative D
discriminant can be negative
No y can take negative but d cannot
im talking about inputs
I mean can
I was talking about D
i mean , we include negatives too when we represent em in mod
like -3 = 1 mod 4
Op can you translate the question ty
No but
Nvm
:3
Yes
discrimination can be negative too , since no condition on roots is given in question
But yes you can start b^2 from anywhere and start substraction by 4 for every residue
So it covers every residue
Wait
Yeah
I said cant
Wait I'm so dumb


thats not how mod works tbh
the whole purpose of mod is to eliminate invariants like 4ac
Fam you are not getting me 😭
explain pls
Mod won't give you the answer to if every natural number is covered
Which is in the form 4n+1 or 4n
it will duh
when we say x = 1 mod 4
Yaar choddo aap jee karo 🥀
we mean x can be anything of the form 4k + 1
so it covers every number of that form automatically
we don’t literally have to check stuff like a baby
thats not very polite tbh
That's not either
whts JEE!
a sius
or Something
If there is no other restriction on x then yes
entrance exam for colleges in india after 12th grade
so whats the issue then
Here x is in the form b^2 - 4ac where b,c are whole numbers and a is a natural number
yea so
That is condition imposed
Oh
So you have to check
alr so
Is it easy or tough
nuh
has anyone looked at the answer I've sent to explain it a bit further
Alr gng
Nvm
Do you know congruence?
its irrelevant if a b c are naturals or whole
works the same in any case
lemme check
i'll write a self contained answer in one message.
b^2 -4ac is not 2 or 3 mod 4. the only possibilities are 0 or 1 mod 4. now we ask, for every integer M that is 0 or 1 mod 4, do there exist natural numbers a,b,c such that b^2 -4ac = M? yes, because b^2 can be arbitrarily large, then just consider the values b^2 -4, b^2 - 8, and so on.
Oh is it wasy
nnno
Yupppp
That's what I've been saying
JEE is entrance exam for engineering colleges
So for the question to be done easily congruence are needed
Or you could use edl
okay can you explain it or i gotta find out myself
b^2 is 0 or 1 mod 4, is it every natural number that is 0 or 1 mod 4 ?
there are others aswell like
NEET is for medical colleges
UPSC is for civil services or smth idk
You could read it in a few books
I'll send you one rq
alright
so ur saying the value of discriminant can be every natural number?
Yes
every integer that is 0 or 1 mod 4
When I try to ragebait but I'm mentally regressed
its okay
practice questions from pathfinder
😭😭😭
youll get good in some time
Sachin sir se padho pee dabloo mai 😈
Number theory
Good for you
Wait i think I know pathfinder
Oh pathfinder is famous
I got one at a thrift shop
Lmfao
!nopdfs
Please post images (such as PNGs or JPGs) of the question rather than other filetypes such as PDFs which have to be downloaded. Non-image downloads can potentially contain viruses or other security risks.
its the best book for elementary olympiad prep
Oh cmon
My teacher was one of the authors of that book
Nice
who
alright
I have the physics one
Sachin singh
thats brainrot tbh
which pathfinder are you talking about
Physics
I find it enjoyable to solve in my free time
Maths pathfinder is ass wdym
It's moderate
its peak bro wth??
thats bshit tbh
Nah way better are available wdym
Irodov is much betterimo
It's enough for advanced, falls short in olympiads
which ones for example
My local community college uses it
Bartle sherbert
i dont like physics that much tbh
It's not a good book yk
If the one ur saying is by Arthur engel
thank you mr document uploaded successfully
No...
i did a bit of mathematical circles
excursion in math
Sl loney (geometry)
path finder
evan chen
david m burton
Why exactly?
im gonna do that now
Evsn chan is nice
It doesn't cover major topics like complex geometry, invariant, group theory
Mathematical circles is good too
yeahh but i dont like euclidean geometry that much so ..
It's gimmicky in nature
It's not a classroom textbook
Evan chen otis programme is good
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
sooo are we done
ok what do i need to know yo solve something like this
.close
to*
okay can i send the next question here on in a nee channrl
channel*
alr ill make a new channel
.close
Closed by @hallow echo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
B
You cant simply this right?
what is g(x)?
Since X is Different from g(x)
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Its the original
well there is something cut off at the start
i think thats just e)
You cant put x in g(x) since x is not g(x)?
you can put the argument like f(2)
that is true perhaps its given at the start
But you cant simply the limit
ren can you send the question screenshot?
if g is continuous then you can write it as 5 g(5)^2
if not then you cant do shit
but you arent giving us the whole context
The question is different im just asking if what it is without the value of g(x) igven
but given that whoever wrote this also wrote x=5 under the limit, maybe the question is just bad
spoken like a true mathematician
well yes if you dont know shit about g then of course you cant do shit
If no g(x) given or value of it, then its final answer is Lim 5[g(5)]^2
no, you need to know that g is continuous for that
You cant simply it right?
Since x is not G(x)
Theres no value of g
You cant make it 125
well either is given somewhere that g(x)=x or they fucked up
facebook.....
Too easy just write 6(g(-3))^3
assuming g is continuous
If no gx given then nothing can do atp
@violet pagoda Has your question been resolved?
You mean if g is continuous at the point x=5
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know I need to use this formula but does it matter which vector I take for y and which one I take for u? Or will they both get me the same result?
Here y is the vector you want to project, so it must be [1 7]
And u is the vector on which you are projecting
Closed by @viral lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Because the hat over y means the "new" y, hence it refers to the projected version of the original y
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello!, so my question is on transformations (in functions) and this was a test question (not my answer my friends) and I am having trouble understanding how he got this answer
it's to clear out that -4
ohh
although i think it's incorrect for the record
can u per chance explain why 😭 and whendoes it even apply
yeah it doesnt seem right
so im rlly confused
you'd get like f(x-3) + 5/4 or something
which seems suboptimal
what i would do is start with a vertical shift of -5 to get rid of that "+5"
order matters here
when doing graph transformations, your options are (with any number):
- multiply the whole frickin thing by -12
- add +8 at the end
- replace x with (3x)
- replace x with (x + 7)
so it would be
- reflect on the x-axis
-reflect on the y axis
-vertically compressed by 1/4
-horizontally compressed by 1/2
-horizontally translated 3 units to the left
-horizontally trsnslated 2 units left
-vertical translated 5 units down
-vertical translation 6 units down
where does the -12 come from? (and other numbers)
you can use whatever numbers you want
the point is that those are the only things you can do
so like if we start with "reflect on the x axis" that means "multiply the whole heckin thing by -1"
ohh
so what we are tryna do is disolve the first equation?
mmmm our target is that k(x) thing over there, f(-2x + 2) - 6
but it seems simplest to start by trying to get to f(x)
if we can
well... there are a few ways to do it. do you remember what your teacher taught?
but so if im answering it should look like this right?
in that it's a list of steps, yes
if im being honest not rlly
i look at yt vids to re-learn
and pray
i can find my class notes tho
mmk, well it's kinda like a puzzle game
i think i understand how to do this tho but idk when i shoud apply this
like what is this used for?
it really becomes helpful when working with trigonometric functions like sin
no no like, what questions need me to do this for future tests
OH
okay wait i think i understand, is it to equations that do not have any applied transformations correct?
um well sometimes you'll start with like √x and describe how to transform it to get to 3√(4x - 7) + 12
oh yeah ik how to do that but i meant the disolving part specifically
just the same in reverse tbh
ohh okay :3
THANK U SM FOR HELPING ME 😭
🙏
i rllu apreceate that
ima close this but pls have a wonderful day :3
.close
Closed by @odd grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any approaches ? also what should we keep in mind to solve it , i mean what exactly are we looking for to get the right equations to find the range
this is a bizarre question. are you allowed to choose more than one answer?
Is this true false or multiple choice
it's completely symmetric in x, y, z so it seems like if (A) is true then (B) is also true
so either AB or CD
take z = 4 - x - y and sub in the second equation
yess
rearrange to form a quadratic in x and evaluate D >= 0 to find range of y
its multiple correct
should work
how did u conclude that just by the fact that it is symmetrical
because (A) and (B) are the same except we replaced x with y
if something is true for x then it must be true for y as well
since nothing in the problem distinguishes between them
It can't be CD though cause if one of the numbers were close to 3 the the square would be greater than 6
ohh
we could call our variables
🐖 and 🧀 instead
we will get approx 5 min to find the answer . is there any shorter way ?
short enough
like 2 mins
but then we will just get the range of x right
and by symmetry
we will say that
y and z will also have same range
?
right ?
yes
ohhkk
@normal bison Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
here
help
i tried sketching it to help
but for c
any idea why for c if u cross normal and l1 direction vector and then cross it with normal again u get direction vector of p2
l2*
cos if u cross normal and l1 u find the line thats 90 degrees to both so thats like idek
(purple)
What have u done so far
@rain coral Has your question been resolved?
erm
nothing
cos
u cant really do anything without the idea
i got the position vector for l2
jst gotta find direction vector
i jst know
ur gna have to cross product things
but
Ok well no u dont
id rather have the understanding
U can do it with dot prod
And all the information they have given
Yea but u can use those scalers to get the vector eq
Ok so lets do this
First let direction vector of L2 be V =(a,b,c)
yh
Consider the dot prod of this with the normal of plane right should be 0 correct?
yh
What did u get
Uh no
cos the magnitudes will be in both equations
Ok first lets just do the dot prod with the normal bro
Go ahead
Tell me what ur equation is
(a,b,c) dot prod the normal of the plane
The direction vector of l2 dotted with the nornal of plane is 0
Remember l2 lies inside the plane
yh
Hence the normal dot with the direction of l2 is 0
Ok lets make it clear tho
,tex 2a+4b-c=0
my fault
Larper(Scholar Of Mysteries)
Next
Do yk the formalae for angle between a line and a line?
No
cross product
Cos(theta) = direction of l1 dot direction of l2 / mag(l1)* mag(l2)
We know theta from part b correct?
yh thats dot product no?
No this is the formulae for angle between two lines
The question says the angle is theta and we found theta from part b?
yes
From this make c the subject
Tell me what u get
c=2a+4b
Ok now sub in to this
And leave it dont do anything with it
so cos(10.6)= 4a-2b+7(2a+4b)/root 69 x root(a^2+b^2+(2a+4b)^2)
a and b are what we call free variable meaning we can choose the values lets pick nice numbers tho a =7 and b=-1 then c = 10
Now check theose numbers in this
Were allowed to do this remember this is from the plane
A plane spans everything right
this means every point in the plane from what we got has coordinate (a,b,2a+4b)
Choose any values for a and b
Then c is forced to be 2a+4b
wait whats the point
of this
To verify the points we picked satisfigy this condition
Satisfy
whats the condition
yh
Or you could do cos^2 = 1 - sin^2 and we know sin^2 remember from part b
U should solve for a i did the working and ud get a =-7b
So now we have two conditions
C=2a+4b
a=-7b
So pick any b then a and c are forced
Does this make sense?
So basical b is an real number once u pick b then a is forced and c is forced
And it satisfies both conditions bc we got them via each condition right
idk
after we made the assumptions and stuff
idk
i jst
didnt get it
the cross product way was in the ms and was 2 lines only
We didnt make any assumptions
We used the fact cos^2 =1-sin^2
Solved this we get a=-7b
So now weve forced a condition on a and b
yh
i jst didnt get
the cross product
considering its alot faster
i jst
idk
cross product
always finds
the normal
thats the thing in the ms
but like
how dyk
like
the outcome of ur cross product lies on the plane or not
ykwim
Hello
@rain coral Has your question been resolved?
hello
hello
@rain coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $G$ be a group and $G/Z(G)$ be cyclic. Show that $G = Z(G)$.
We want to show that gh = hg for any h in G
ILikeMathematics
Closed by @vast wyvern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
c) Let $d$ be any set. Prove there is an ordinal $\alpha$ such that $\alpha \notin d$, yet every $\beta < \alpha$ is an element of $d$.
I am a little stuck on this
toast
\textbf{c) Let $d$ be any set. Prove there is an ordinal $\alpha$ such that $\alpha \notin d$, yet every $\beta < \alpha$ is an element of $d$.}
\\
Let $\alpha$ be any ordinal. Let $d = \bigcup\alpha$. I will claim that $\alpha \notin d$ but for all $\beta < \alpha$, $\beta \in d$. Suppose $\alpha \in \bigcup \alpha$ by way of contradiction. That means, there exists some set $y \in \alpha$ such that $\alpha \in y$. But because ordinals are transitive, we get $\alpha \in \alpha$. But by a lemma, this is a contradiction. Now assume by way of contradiction, there exists some $\beta^* < \alpha$, but $\beta^* \notin d$. Observe that if $\beta^* < \alpha$, then $\beta^* \in \alpha$.
toast
I don't think $d = \bigcup \alpha$ is a valid set in this case right?
toast
or am i on the right track
I think this will be true for most ordinals, but not all ordinals
wait hmm
wait
am i dumb
why cant we just use $d = \alpha$
toast
cuz $\alpha \notin \alpha$ but every element $\beta \in \alpha$ is in $\alpha$?
toast
how do you know how to write in LaTeX?
just wondering
@cerulean ruin Has your question been resolved?
just do it alot
<@&286206848099549185>
is this trivial
😭
d isn't an ordinal though
I'm confused
uh
oh ok
so we arent really constructing d
but then does d have to contain ordinals 0 through beta?
or is it saying
hm
so we pick any random d, then find some alpha such that any elements less than alpha is in d but not alpha itself
@cerulean ruin Has your question been resolved?
@cerulean ruin Has your question been resolved?
You know you can ping helpers if they don't respond in 15 mins
i did 🗿
<@&286206848099549185> hey how do i approach this problem 🙏
more set theory
lol
lol, transfinite induction?
if 0 isnt in d then a = 0
if it is, induction time
oh hm...
D is any ordered set, more specifically
d is any set
this holds for all sets
It has an order on it
wdym
If d is unordered then beta < alpha is meaningless
but < is the epsilon relation for ordinals
well beta < alpha just means beta in alpha
Am I stupid?
so < has a rigorous meaning
Must be
like d doesnt necessarily have to have an order
do you know what an ordinal is
I forgot what < means setwise, allow a foolish man his prattlings
lol its fine
yeah i think
intuitively a is the smallest ordinal not in d
i would induct on epsilon probably
epsilon induction ftw
when it says every beta < alpha, does it imply 0 through beta must be in d
but what if we have like all finite ordinals, then our alpha is omega?
hmm
i see
but uh
yeah
buh just eps induct
0
oh ok
alpha = 0
ohhh
alpha is the smallest ordinal not in the set




