#help-27

1 messages · Page 390 of 1

serene swallow
#

i just want know how to be more mindful during exams

sand pumice
#

do you go over your answers once you're done writing

mild anvil
#

draw a diagram

#

a tree diagram

#

diagrams are really useful

#

are you pressed on time?

serene swallow
#

answering to both of u my Yes i would love to recheck or draw diagrams but i run short on time

mild anvil
#

do past papers and give yourself less time maybe

serene swallow
#

i have done that

mild anvil
#

and i was pressed on time

#

i rounded to 2 decimal places instead of 1

#

😭

sand pumice
#

when rechecking see if you can approach a problem in a different manner and if that gives you the same result

serene swallow
#

i have been there😭😭

sand pumice
mild anvil
#

i only ended up getting a 93

serene swallow
mild anvil
#

when doing homework don’t rush

#

take it easy

mystic hound
#

tbh icl this feels like it might be a bigger thing 😭

serene swallow
serene swallow
mystic hound
#

do you have a teacher or someone you can talk to about it?

sand pumice
sand pumice
mystic hound
#

i mean i obviously don’t know anything about how your school works but idk maybe you could get better help from people close to you or extra time or smth

serene swallow
serene swallow
mild anvil
mystic hound
#

this is such an interesting issue i’ve never heard of someone who’s felt like this

#

sounds rough tho

serene swallow
mild anvil
#

true

serene swallow
mild anvil
#

it was hella easy

#

it was just pressed on time

mystic hound
#

it would suck to then have to worry about that too

sand pumice
mild anvil
#

do a bunch of practice problems and if you get them wrong get your mum to hit you

#

💀

serene swallow
sand pumice
mystic hound
#

oh yeah shit

serene swallow
#

im hella scared if this shit continues

mystic hound
#

honestly man if i were you id press on it more to teachers

#

parents

#

whoever

mild anvil
#

maybe its the exam anxiety

serene swallow
#

trust me bro they all give suggestions i have tried

serene swallow
mild anvil
#

and you feel nervous from your previous mistakes

mild anvil
mystic hound
#

im assuming that you can read otherwise completely fine

#

and understand text completely normally

#

first time you read it

mild anvil
#

do a broad read of the question then close read

serene swallow
serene swallow
mild anvil
#

hmm

mystic hound
#

weird

mild anvil
#

practice is key

mystic hound
#

this is so interesting

serene swallow
mystic hound
#

give yourself a set amount of time when you practice and see if it still happens

serene swallow
mystic hound
#

does it still happen then?

mild anvil
#

clearly not enough

serene swallow
serene swallow
mystic hound
#

i mean honestly idk much about psychology but maybe it’s like some kinda deeper anxiety thing or smth

mystic hound
#

idk man

mild anvil
#

i think its just practixe

#

practice

mystic hound
#

i’ve never heard of it before

serene swallow
#

same here

mystic hound
#

for context how is a reference book?

#

like im guessing it’s just a bunch of math questions

serene swallow
#

like they are the best MATH books u can manage to get your hands on in india atleast

sand pumice
#

these two are the books everybody recommends for some reason

serene swallow
mystic hound
#

no idea

serene swallow
#

yea like they are the best

mystic hound
#

cool

serene swallow
#

here and pretty tuff too

serene swallow
mystic hound
#

is like a lot of just equations tho?

#

cause i’d guess the practice would just be doing a lot of practice questions

#

under time

sand pumice
#

one of them contains every type of problem that you would see the other i dont know

serene swallow
#

i am messing u

sand pumice
#

rds

serene swallow
mild anvil
#

yes

#

you should

serene swallow
sand pumice
serene swallow
#

but then my time is messed up

serene swallow
sand pumice
mystic hound
#

how much time do y’all have?

#

and like how many questions is it

sand pumice
serene swallow
serene swallow
mystic hound
#

oh no i mean the average exam you have

sand pumice
#

usually it's 3 hours

mystic hound
#

how long are those relative to the amount of questions?

sand pumice
#

average as in periodic tests and stuff?

mystic hound
#

uh yeah sure

#

unless exams are like way longer ig

sand pumice
#

that varies everywhere

deep abyss
mystic hound
#

well ig let’s say a final exam then

mystic hound
sand pumice
#

3 hours

mystic hound
#

and how many questions

#

roughly

#

i’m trying to relate it to my exams

deep abyss
#

I think there r 30/40 ques

#

Ofc of different weightage

mystic hound
#

yeah

#

uhhh

deep abyss
#

@serene swallow maybe sample papers might help

mystic hound
#

cause we have 5 hours to do 10-15 tasks with anywhere from 1-4 questions per task

deep abyss
#

Like proof based ques or ques with mulitple sub parts

#

And there r mcqs

mystic hound
#

yeah we don’t have those

#

not at my level at least

#

high school last year (kinda)

deep abyss
#

Oh this is highschl last year then 11 12 is pre uni

mystic hound
#

you guys have stuff that’s pre uni but after high school?

#

well tbf our high school is later but

deep abyss
#

Where is OPratgrenade

mystic hound
#

yeah

deep abyss
mystic hound
#

i started in the school i’m in now at 18

#

but most start at 16-17

#

but no we just go directly to uni after this

deep abyss
#

Wyf

mystic hound
#

huh?

#

oh

#

denmark

deep abyss
#

Ahh is it like 6 25am?

mystic hound
#

yeah

#

i did not sleep

#

at all

deep abyss
#

Im such a genius

mystic hound
#

math and shit

#

this help channel is dead now

#

we killed it

#

teamwork

deep abyss
#

We whoratgrenade

mystic hound
#

dont try to pretend you didn’t take part in this

#

this is on both of us

devout snowBOT
#

@serene swallow Has your question been resolved?

deep abyss
devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

main tendon
#

Can someone guide me in solving this

devout snowBOT
main tendon
#

I found that the RHS is (n-1)³+n³

#

but how do I do for the LHS

stone stump
#

add up all the LHSs

#

and check where each of them start and end

main tendon
glossy dew
#

yup

olive snow
#

Indeed

tender wharf
#

-# yes

main tendon
#

Now, how am I supposed to solve the (n-1)² terms

tender wharf
#

they are AP

main tendon
# tender wharf they are AP

Yea but LHS became
[(n-1)²+1] + [(n-1)²+2] + ..... +n² right? So, how do I know the last term of that (n-1)²'s AP

main tendon
#

am I getting something wrong here

tender wharf
#

for n> 0 every row starts with (n-1)²+1] and ends with n^2

#

so you have first and last term

#

you can figure the number of terms in every row

main tendon
#

oh mb when replacing the n with actual value, we do get the AP. Just the representation is different right?

tender wharf
#

yesh

tender wharf
devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @main tendon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

main tendon
#

ty

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

broken narwhal
#

should my first step be times 2 by 27/4

devout snowBOT
broken narwhal
#

if i didnt cancel

mild anvil
#

first

broken narwhal
#

can that be my first step

mild anvil
#

but yes multiply 2 to remove the fraction

pseudo basin
devout snowBOT
#

@broken narwhal Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean lintel
#

Four points A, B, C, D lie on a circle with diameter 6radical2 such that ABCD is a quadrilateral and BD is a diameter of the circle. If AC bisects angle BAD and the length of AD is 1, what is the perimeter of ABCD ?

Can anyone helo me solve this? I don't know where to start

lean lintel
#

6 × radical2

#

Basically rad72

modern imp
#

i call it square root

#

so if i use that please bear with me

lean lintel
lean lintel
modern imp
#

alright, so since AC bisects angle BAD , we can locate C

#

wrt to the circle and BD

#

||its the arc midpoint||

lean lintel
fluid token
#

also, as BD is diameter, angle BAD is|| 90 degrees||

lean lintel
#

I'm trynna send a pic

lean lintel
modern imp
#

nice

lean lintel
#

A is basically half the BD arc

#

So 90 degrees

modern imp
#

how is A midpoint of arc

lean lintel
modern imp
#

but that doesnt imply A is midpoint of arc

#

infact it isnt

lean lintel
#

We never said it is

young spade
# lean lintel 6 radical 2

Just as a side note, people usually write it as 6 sqrt2
mostly cause in this server we are used to writing in TeX markdown

modern imp
#

cuz it bisects BAD

lean lintel
#

The BD arc on the other half of the circle should be 180 degrees

#

Wait

modern imp
#

yes but A and C should be on opposite sides

#

of BD

lean lintel
#

Ah

modern imp
#

now use pythagorus

lean lintel
#

U are right lemme check

#

Oki we are getting somewhere

#

Can u draw the circle and send me a pic

modern imp
#

i cant but i can explain

#

i dont have pencils and stuff

lean lintel
#

What should I replace?

modern imp
#

yah, so basically since AC bisects BAD, AC must pass through BD, so A and C should be on opposite sides

lean lintel
#

Lemme test it

#

How can AC bisect BAD

tender wharf
deep abyss
modern imp
lean lintel
#

Jeez this Internet

#

Whatever I get it now

tender wharf
#

paint

lean lintel
#

Oki let's go to the next step

modern imp
#

alright

#

so we have AD

#

and we know angle BAD is 90

lean lintel
modern imp
#

what can we use

lean lintel
#

Same for BCD

modern imp
lean lintel
#

Spelled wrong tho

modern imp
#

pythagorus

#

iirc

#

anyways

lean lintel
#

Oki lemme see

#

We can find AD

modern imp
#

and since we know all the other sides....

lean lintel
#

We can find AB I meant

#

We already know AD

#

AB is obviously rad72 squared - 1

#

AB² I meant

modern imp
#

good fruit

lean lintel
#

So AB it self is Rad(rad72-1)

deep abyss
#

$\sqrt{72}^2-1$

woven radishBOT
#

ch3rry

lean lintel
#

It isn't?

modern imp
#

no you have to square the rad72

#

as mr cherry is doing

#

wait sorry ms cherry

deep abyss
#

-# mr cherry naurway

lean lintel
modern imp
#

72-1

modern imp
lean lintel
deep abyss
#

-# how dare u assume my gender

modern imp
lean lintel
#

Oki so AB is rad71

#

Now let's find other sides

deep abyss
lean lintel
#

Can we somehow find CD?

modern imp
lean lintel
modern imp
#

yes

#

we can use that

lean lintel
#

How

modern imp
#

OD=OC and angle is 90

lean lintel
#

Who is O

modern imp
#

centre lol

lean lintel
#

How come is OD = OC

#

It is

modern imp
#

its a circle

lean lintel
#

Radius

lean lintel
modern imp
#

so both are equal to radius

lean lintel
#

Ye correct

#

Now how we find length of CD

modern imp
#

pythagorus again

lean lintel
#

Smart

#

18 + DC² = OC?

modern imp
#

nope

lean lintel
#

What's wrong

#

OC squared ops

modern imp
#

OC^2+OD^2=CD^2

#

and we know OC and OD

lean lintel
#

CD isn't next to the 90 degree angle

modern imp
#

CD is the hypotenuse

lean lintel
#

But

#

OC should be hypotenuse

fluid token
modern imp
#

i gtg now, valar can you help pineapple

lean lintel
#

Cuz C can also not be in the middle of the arc

lean lintel
lean lintel
fluid token
#

so arc BC and arc CD are equal as they subtend equal angles on circumference

lean lintel
#

I think I'm starting to get it

#

Can u draw it for me?

fluid token
lean lintel
#

Thanks ❤️

#

So

deep abyss
#

I also draw for youratgrenade

lean lintel
lean lintel
deep abyss
#

CD=BC

#

Equal arcs subtend equal angles

lean lintel
deep abyss
#

Or well chords

#

Huh

lean lintel
#

Language barrier makes this worse

deep abyss
#

I was referring to BAC=CAD=45°

#

These are subtended by CD and BC

lean lintel
deep abyss
#

So tht means those r equal

#

BAC mb

tender wharf
lean lintel
lean lintel
tender wharf
#

ah

deep abyss
#

Okay so

lean lintel
#

Oki both 45

deep abyss
#

Now i suppose you can use right triangle BCD to ur advantage

lean lintel
#

We can figure out BC if we had CD

#

Problem is we don't have CD but we can find it

deep abyss
lean lintel
deep abyss
#

Say $(6\sqrt{2})^2=BC^2+CD^2$

woven radishBOT
#

ch3rry

deep abyss
#

And $BC=CD$

woven radishBOT
#

ch3rry

deep abyss
#

2 eqns 2 variables

lean lintel
lean lintel
#

But how do we know BC and CD are the same?

deep abyss
lean lintel
deep abyss
deep abyss
lean lintel
#

Ah fuck

#

Jeez

#

They are both 45 BCD

#

And CDA

deep abyss
#

Yes pineapple

#

No CDA is 90

lean lintel
#

So yea then CD = BC

deep abyss
#

Right pineapple

lean lintel
#

CDB I meant

#

Noe

#

Their squares is 72

#

So they are each radical 32

#

Or 4 radical 2

deep abyss
#

Wut

deep abyss
lean lintel
deep abyss
lean lintel
#

They are equal So each of them is radical 32

#

Radical 32 is 4 × radical 2

#

Total 8 radical 2s is total for CD + CB

deep abyss
#

You mean rt36?

lean lintel
#

So total is 13 + rad71

#

The perimeter

#

Wow u solved it

#

6 + 6 + 1 + rad71 ( we found 1 + rad71 earlier )

deep abyss
#

Yayy

#

Go pineappleeeee

lean lintel
#

Hurray

#

I felt so dumb

deep abyss
lean lintel
deep abyss
#

Thank me

lean lintel
#

Thanks alot for your help and see you!

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lean lintel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

royal jay
#

hi

devout snowBOT
royal jay
#

Hi I have this logic (r→(s∨p))∧(r∧q)∧(p→¬q) and I am supposed to prove that it's true when using both the deduction and the reduction method for logic. I have made steps for both but im getting stuck on the later parts so I would like some help

royal jay
#

1: r∧¬¬q assumption
2: r ,1 conjuctive simplification
3: q ,1 conjuctive simplification + double negative
4: p→¬q assumption
5: ¬p ,3,4 modus tollens

#

as for reduction method:

(r→(s∨p))∧(r∧q)∧(p→¬q) jag har gjort följande med reduktions metoden
1: assume that the conclusion is false but the assumptions are correct but S is false
2:r∧¬¬q is true so r and q must both be true
3:q true implicates that ¬q is false
4: ¬q false means that p must also be false since p→¬q is true

#

but from there im kinda stuck

devout snowBOT
#

@royal jay Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@royal jay Has your question been resolved?

royal jay
#

<@&286206848099549185>

vale bolt
#

hi

royal jay
#

hello sorry for pinging I posted my problem above, im new to this server and this service in particular so im not sure if I have done this correctly

devout snowBOT
#

@royal jay Has your question been resolved?

covert shale
#

where does this assumption ( r∧¬¬q ) come from?

#

from (r∧q) ?

royal jay
#

ahh my bad I

#

yes

#

its originally r∧--q

covert shale
#

got it

royal jay
#

so a double negative

#

but I dont know why he did that

covert shale
#

actually, can you post the whole original problem?

royal jay
#

sure gimme a sec

covert shale
#

idk why question makers write double negatives either it's pretty redundant

royal jay
covert shale
#

,rotate

royal jay
#

its in swedish but nevermind that

woven radishBOT
covert shale
#

ah we want to show this implies s

royal jay
#

yes

covert shale
#

you can start by rewriting the implications to get a more normal form perhaps

royal jay
#

I might in a normal case but my teacher is very obtuse and im not risking it

covert shale
#

ah i see

royal jay
#

its the last steps that I need help with from both the reduction and deduction method

#

1: r∧¬¬q assumption
2: r ,1 conjuctive simplification
3: q ,1 conjuctive simplification + double negative
4: p→¬q assumption
5: ¬p ,3,4 modus tollens
as for reduction method:

(r→(s∨p))∧(r∧q)∧(p→¬q) jag har gjort följande med reduktions metoden
1: assume that the conclusion is false but the assumptions are correct but S is false
2:r∧¬¬q is true so r and q must both be true
3:q true implicates that ¬q is false
4: ¬q false means that p must also be false since p→¬q is true
but from there im kinda stuck

#

I did this for both

covert shale
#

got it

#

i'll take another look

#

perhaps it is best to consider the whole expression including the final implication

royal jay
#

what do you mean?

covert shale
#

no i thought i was onto something, wasn't lol

#

i'm stuck on where the assumption that (r and q) is true comes from, it doesn't seem immediate

#

unless we're just asserting that it is

royal jay
#

deduction or reduction?

covert shale
#

both

royal jay
#

ah I c

#

my teacher has these truth diagrams

#

and if we look at the top left one

#

we se that r and q can only be true if they are both true

#

thats for reduction

#

as for deduction I used subjunctive simplification

covert shale
#

i see, but the truth values for p, q, r, and s are not assigned yet, so we cannot make this assumption

royal jay
#

i think thats what its called

#

well we since we assume that the expressions are true and that the conclusion S is false

#

according to my teacher anyway

covert shale
#

hm, interesting

#

so he's trying to prove a contradiction then

royal jay
#

?

#

ah

#

yes

covert shale
#

so we want to reduce to (not s) basically

royal jay
#

we prove that the assumption of S being false is wrong

#

yes

#

sorry if im not conveying the problem

covert shale
#

no worries, just trying to see what your teacher is trying to convey to you

#

this is all pretty simple algebra when you rewrite the implications and distribute a little, but you said you don't want to do that

royal jay
#

well its not that I dont, its more like Im not sure if he will accept it

#

one of the students from his class said one wrong word for this particular problem and he sent the problem back and said redo

#

everything else was correct

#

but not that one word

#

so he is very on the nose with everything

covert shale
#

augh that's strange

royal jay
#

yeee

#

he is special

covert shale
#

lol

royal jay
#

but I need to pass this or I cant go for my masters degree next year

covert shale
#

oh god 😭

royal jay
#

I have done the exam but not these problems that we send in

#

and the deadline is 12 of january

covert shale
#

i'd first try using the rewrite as a back-up solution and then consult him to see if he'd accept that when the time comes

#

i need to go for now, maybe someone else can take a better look

royal jay
#

ahh i c

#

thanks

#

should I ping or just wait?

covert shale
devout snowBOT
#

@royal jay Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @royal jay

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

neon wagon
#

On another wheel of fortune with 100 sectors, 20 sectors are labeled “Win”, 50 are labeled “Lose”, and the rest are labeled “0”.

c) Calculate how many times the player must spin the wheel at least in order to have a probability of at least 94.88% of spinning “Win” at least once.

#

can someone help

neon wagon
#

like this formula is correct but idk why its >=

full trellis
#

Do you have the rest of your work or is this just copied from the solution?

neon wagon
#

no this is mine

#

like

#

i just kinda memorized how to solve these type of questions

#

but i dont really udnertsnd

full trellis
#

Alright let's just try and solve it from the beginning then

#

Whats the probability to win in one spin?

neon wagon
#

to get the label win

#

yeah

full trellis
#

Yeah, then we use the complement event 'no win in n spins '(= every spin is not a win)

neon wagon
#

yeah so 0,2 ^n for the at least thing right

neon wagon
#

were looking for atleast one win

full trellis
#

Because 'at least one win' is difficult to count directly

#

But the complement is a lot easier

#

What are some possible cases of getting a win at least once in n spins?

neon wagon
#

wdym

#

i dont understand

full trellis
#

Like say you do 10 spins. What different ways are there to get at least one win?

#

You could get 1 win, 2 wins, 3 wins...

neon wagon
#

oh

#

so uhh

#

like every possible way i mean

#

10 wins or 9 or 8 or 6

#

etc

full trellis
#

Yeah any one of those can mean 'at least one win'

neon wagon
#

oh yeah ngl

#

ur right

full trellis
#

So when we take the complement, there is only one case to look at

#

So whats the probability of no win in n spins?

neon wagon
#

what event would we be looking at in the complement

full trellis
neon wagon
#

ohhh

#

were seperating the wins from the other things

#

so we are just left with the wins

neon wagon
full trellis
#

How do you take the complement? The chance to win in one spin was 0.2

#

Whats the chance a spin is not a win?

neon wagon
#

0.8

#

%

full trellis
#

Right

neon wagon
#

oh yeah

full trellis
#

No just 0.8

#

That would be 80%

neon wagon
#

the n confuses me

#

yeah

full trellis
#

Okay so we have 0.8 probability in one spin. What is the chance for n spins?

full trellis
#

What is the chance to keep getting 'no win' when we do an n amount of spins

full trellis
#

Let's think about just doing two spins

neon wagon
#

okay

full trellis
#

So n = 2 right?

neon wagon
#

yeah

full trellis
#

So you have (not win spin 1) AND (not win spin 2)

neon wagon
#

yeah

full trellis
#

How do you calculate the chance here?

neon wagon
#

0,8^2

#

?

full trellis
#

Yep

#

Notice the exponent is 2

neon wagon
#

yeah

full trellis
#

So what is it for n amount of spins?

neon wagon
#

n

#

infinite

#

idk

#

like

#

oh

#

0.8^n

full trellis
#

Mhm

neon wagon
#

oh

#

yeah

full trellis
#

So how do we properly write P(at least one win) knowing this?

neon wagon
#

i understand

full trellis
#

Exactly

#

And that's how you get the expression in your photo

neon wagon
#

we seperate teh wins from the other

#

oh but

#

heres the question

#

why the >=

#

whats up with that

#

the >

full trellis
#

Because it is at least one win. You can also get 2, 3, 4, 5, ... , n amount of wins

#

That would also satisfy 'at least 1'

neon wagon
#

ohhhh

#

like

#

so "<" would be then

#

at most?

#

right

full trellis
#

Yes

neon wagon
#

oh okay

#

man i got alot of subjects left to study

full trellis
full trellis
devout snowBOT
#

@neon wagon Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @neon wagon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bleak stag
devout snowBOT
grand edge
#

Have you tried Change of base?

bleak stag
#

i was tryin to use ln

inner summit
bleak stag
inner summit
#

do you know what the change of base formula is

grand edge
#

$\log_{a}\left(b\right)=\frac{\log_{c}\left(b\right)}{\log_{c}\left(a\right)}$

woven radishBOT
grand edge
# bleak stag i was tryin to use ln

Change of base is how you're going to get any natural logarithms and get the x term out of the base. Once you do that, you have a simple equation in terms of ln(x)

bleak stag
#

ok i will try

#

now idk how to go from this

pearl relic
#

flip each fraction

#

the base goes on the bottom

torpid cloak
stoic lotus
#

Why would you convert to natural log instead of base 4?

#

You'd get a nice quadratic equation

pearl relic
stoic lotus
bleak stag
#

ok i finished

stoic lotus
#

You just factor out ln4, pretty much the same thing

bleak stag
#

but i lowk dunno the restrictions

stoic lotus
#

Wdym

bleak stag
#

like the restrictions on the domain

stoic lotus
#

Logarithm bases cannot be negative and cannot equal to 1

bleak stag
#

hopefully this is right

stoic lotus
#

Yep

#

Nice

bleak stag
#

thanks guys

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @bleak stag

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

forest flower
#

hi can anyone help me with this problem i dont get how im supposed to do it

devout snowBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
forest flower
#

1

forest flower
uncut crow
#

i have a hint. what would be the answer if you surveyed 1 person?

#

go away

sand quarry
violet wind
#

!nosols

#

!noai

devout snowBOT
#

As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.

#

Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).

sand quarry
#

<@&268886789983436800>

forest flower
#

wuh

smoky hull
sand quarry
arctic field
#

using AI to respond to help channels is not helpful

forest flower
sand quarry
forest flower
#

2/5

sand quarry
#

Ok awesome

forest flower
#

😲😲

#

wait hows that possible

sand quarry
#

So out of 500 people, how many like baseball given that ratio

sand quarry
forest flower
#

hmm

forest flower
#

200/500

sand quarry
#

Yeah

#

So how many

forest flower
#

300 play it

#

wait

#

how many what

sand quarry
#

How many people like it

sand quarry
forest flower
#

200

sand quarry
#

Yeah cool

#

So 3/5 of those people play it

#

What'd that number be

forest flower
#

hmm

#

lemme think

#

how did i get 600/2500

#

do i simplify it

sand quarry
#

Idk either but thats correct

sand quarry
#

Maks the denominator 500

forest flower
#

120/500

sand quarry
forest flower
#

😯😯

sand quarry
#

So how many people played baseball

forest flower
#

120

#

😲😲😲😲😲😲😲😲

sand quarry
#

Aight

forest flower
#

is that the answer

sand quarry
#

Yep

forest flower
#

THANK YOU

devout snowBOT
#

@forest flower Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @forest flower

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

glossy obsidian
#

FInding the natural domain and range of this function

glossy obsidian
#

I've been thought to find the factors when it comes to quadratics which means x values they cannot be..

#

but in this, they are unfactorisable due to having a negative discriminant

#

anyone mind telling me how to start in these type of questions?

void fox
#

for this expression to make sense you basically only require that the argument to the logarithm is positive

#

ie it is asking you when is x^2+2x+3 positive

tall comet
crystal dawn
#

but yea in this case

tall comet
tall comet
glossy obsidian
#

so if the domain is greater than 0, that would mean the range is always positive?

crystal dawn
#

range of ln is always all reals

glossy obsidian
#

ahh ok

#

what about normal log

crystal dawn
#

same

tall comet
#

if it is positive then there are no restrictions for the log

glossy obsidian
#

so any type of log will always have a all real y?

crystal dawn
#

$\log_a(x)$ produces all reals

void fox
#

Maybe the question meant to ask what is the image of this function

woven radishBOT
#

Hanako(x, y); ∂(fox)/∂x

void fox
#

otherwise you can always just say the range is ℝ

crystal dawn
#

and this is regardless of its domain

glossy obsidian
#

its asking for the natural domain of the function

glossy obsidian
crystal dawn
#

in this case, the only thing that concerns you is that the argument to the log must always be positive

#

then check the argument of the log

glossy obsidian
#

what do u mean by arguement of the log?

crystal dawn
glossy obsidian
#

oh yeah

tall comet
crystal dawn
#

so check whatever inside the log function. ban all values of the variable that makes the argument negative or 0

glossy obsidian
#

so in this case the arguement of the log is positive, how does that effect the function?

#

would that mean the domain and range will always be all real?

crystal dawn
#

yes

#

wait actually no

#

the domain is all reals, yes

glossy obsidian
#

what about range

crystal dawn
#

but because you have a minimum on the quadratic, you'll need to find the minimum of the log separately

#

let the quadratic be at its min, then solve for the log

glossy obsidian
#

so for this question here, i know that if i sub in anynumber it will spit out a positive number, which means that it is all real x?

crystal dawn
#

all real x is the domain, yes

crystal dawn
#

you know how quadratics either have a min or a max?

glossy obsidian
#

yeah

crystal dawn
#

since log is strictly increasing over its domain, and the argument is a quadratic that is never negative, the minimum of the quadratic argument is also the minimum of the log function in this case

#

put another way, the quadratic will never get under a certain value

#

the minimum of the log function is thus ln(whatever value the quadratic will never fall below)

glossy obsidian
#

so, whenever there is a quadratic as a arugement of log.. the means that the quadratic represents the minimum of the log(quadratic) graph?

crystal dawn
#

no

#

its minimum does, assuming its minimum is not negative

#

and it applies in this case because the minimum of this quadratic is positive (the whole quad is always positive anyway)

glossy obsidian
#

is what you're saying here is that the minimum of both the log(quadratic) and quadratic are the same? but only when the quadratic has a minimum?

crystal dawn
#

no

glossy obsidian
#

sorry i dont quiet get it 😓

crystal dawn
#

ok so let's find the minimum of this quad

glossy obsidian
#

-2/3

#

?

crystal dawn
#

the minimum of this quad is f(-2/2) = f(-1) = 1 - 2 + 3 = 2

#

but that is just the minimum of the quadratic

#

so now, ln(2) is the minimum of c(x)

glossy obsidian
#

ok

crystal dawn
#

and ln(2) is

#

,w ln(2)

crystal dawn
#

that thing

#

so your range is all real y greater to or equal to that thing

glossy obsidian
#

ahhh ok icic

#

so id have to find the minimum of the y then put that into the log function and that will spit out the minimum of the function

crystal dawn
#

mm...

glossy obsidian
#

and in this case since its a minimum, its anything greater than the new minimum

crystal dawn
#

ok let's make it clearer

#

suppose you have a function $\ln{c}$ where c is some expression (linear, quadratic, etc.)

woven radishBOT
#

Hanako(x, y); ∂(fox)/∂x

crystal dawn
#

then, if c is always positive and has no minimum (or has a minimum of 0), the range of ln c is still all reals.
if c is always positive and has a minimum, the range of ln c is all real y greater than, or equal to, the minimum of ln c

glossy obsidian
#

right

#

in expressions like ln( sinx or e^x ) that just means its all real

crystal dawn
#

careful. the argument to logs cannot be 0

#

and sin(x) = 0 for all x = npi (n integer)

glossy obsidian
#

ahh ok

crystal dawn
#

also uh

#

ln(e^x) is just x

#

by definition

uncut crow
#

sin(x) is also negative in some places

crystal dawn
#

oops yea forgor

glossy obsidian
glossy obsidian
crystal dawn
#

it would work where sine is positive

#

but anywhere outside and ln just dies

#

well any log just dies, not just ln

uncut crow
#

it wouldn’t parse when x is such that sin(x) is negative

crystal dawn
#

so the domain of ln(sin(x)) looks more like {x | 0 < x - 2n pi < pi} (integer n)

glossy obsidian
#

why wouldnt ln(sinx) not work out
if i rmbb sinx has positive and negative

crystal dawn
glossy obsidian
#

why it wouldnt

crystal dawn
#

it would! you'll just need to limit the domain

glossy obsidian
#

as long as the log function is positive in all areas, the log will work out

#

but in the case of sinx since it has both positive and negative, we would have to chop off the domain to make sure the function is always positive?

crystal dawn
#

correct

#

otherwise log dies and we are sad

glossy obsidian
#

ahh ok makes more sense now

#

and to recall

#

log cannot be zero either is that right

crystal dawn
#

yup, hence why I used < instead of $\leq$

woven radishBOT
#

Hanako(x, y); ∂(fox)/∂x

glossy obsidian
#

ahh ok

#

js wanted to clarify

#

if the log is greater than 1 does that mean, x1 <= 1?

crystal dawn
#

what's x1

glossy obsidian
#

a function

crystal dawn
#

and where is this function

glossy obsidian
#

wait sorry the base*

#

not function

crystal dawn
#

so you're asking, if $\log_{x_1}(c) > 1$, then ${x_1}$ is necesarily $\leq 1$

woven radishBOT
#

Hanako(x, y); ∂(fox)/∂x

glossy obsidian
#

yes

crystal dawn
#

no, of course not.
ln(e^2) = 2 but e > 1

glossy obsidian
#

because i got some help from someone last time and thats what i was told, but i wasnt too sure about it

crystal dawn
#

was there some context to the question?

glossy obsidian
#

they were asking to solve the inequation

crystal dawn
#

but the base here is e

#

doesn't make sense, cuz e > 1

glossy obsidian
#

i dont quiet get it

crystal dawn
#

as a reminder, you asked whether the base of a log is necessarily leq 1 if the log itself is greater than 1

#

but here the base is already greater than 1

#

perhaps there is some other context I'm missing or I'm misreading this hard

glossy obsidian
#

the base that was given was > 1, and i was told that whenever it is larger than 1, then x1(function) <= 0

#

when the base is < 1 , then x1 >= 0

#

the inequality sign is switched up

#

i was just asking whether that is correct or not

#

sorry that i didnt clarify

crystal dawn
#

uh... let me try to understand

#

what is x1(function)?

glossy obsidian
#

i was saying that x1 represents a function

crystal dawn
#

ok so now x1 is a function and not the base. what kind of function is x1? what has it to do with the log in question?

glossy obsidian
#

i was saying that since e is around 2.71, and is > 1

#

the function is <= 0

#

but lets say instead of e its 0.4, the function would be => 0

crystal dawn
#

but the value of the function depends on x!

#

you can't just say the function is less than 0 or greater than 0 without saying what value you're using for x

glossy obsidian
#

ohh sorry

#

ur right

glossy obsidian
crystal dawn
#

the whole log is \leq 0 if its argument is \leq 1

#

so check where the rational function inside the log has the same sign on both num and denom, and abs(num) < abs(denom), and (num \neq 0 and denom \neq 0)

glossy obsidian
crystal dawn
#

to slow down and clarify:

  • same sign on numerator and denominator to prevent negative argument to log (negative divided by a negative is positive, recall)
  • abs(numerator) \leq abs(denominator) to ensure a fractional argument, fulfilling the \leq 1 criteria
  • numerator \neq 0 to prevent 0 argument to log
  • denominator \neq 0 for obvious reasons

\neq = not equal to, \leq = less than or equal to

#

the terminology comes from latex: $\neq$ and $\leq$

woven radishBOT
#

Hanako(x, y); ∂(fox)/∂x

glossy obsidian
#

ahh okay i understand

#

i just tested, and whenver i put it any number a positive number will come

crystal dawn
#

might wanna double-check

glossy obsidian
#

oh hm

#

so far some fractions do not work

#

ok all good i think ive gotte it now

#

thank you so much for your time and help @crystal dawn

#

hope i can get help from u again sometime, cos im for sure asking again sometime again 😅

crystal dawn
#

nps

#

!done if you're done

devout snowBOT
#

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close

glossy obsidian
#

!done

devout snowBOT
#

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close

glossy obsidian
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @glossy obsidian

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

short hare
#

f(x) is a piecewise bitch of
3x^2 + 4 : x >= 1
6x+1 : x < 1
I wanna find the local maximum/minimum/(s)/ifthereis

I started by differentiating the two pieces and rewriting
6x : x > 1
6 : x < 1
first question; what do i write for x=1?

the critical points are supposedly the turning point (x=1) and f'(x) = 0 which from the 6x piece we get x=0

short hare
#

but is wrong 😔 pls help

crystal dawn
#

uh, what happened to x = 1 on the first definition in the derivative?

void fox
#

f(x) is what??

short hare
crystal dawn
#

it should be the first definition as well, no?

short hare
#

it is

crystal dawn
#

your first piece is x \geq 1, but your derivative's first piece is x > 1

short hare
#

bc

#

we're not sure if

#

its even differnetiable there

crystal dawn
#

I must be tweaking out then, ignore me

winter torrent
crystal dawn
#

ah bleak
every day my lack of calc knowledge shows some more

winter torrent
#

no it's fine that's a reasonable doubt

short hare
#

what do i do hayley 🙁

winter torrent
#

well since the limits of your derivatives agree at x=1 you can say that the derivative at x=1 is also 6

short hare
#

now, what are the critical points for hte fucntion

winter torrent
#

u tell me

short hare
#

why am i constnatly being hamster held

crystal dawn
#

because you are car
now give it a shot :D

short hare
#

is that correct

winter torrent
#

i guess it depends on your definition of critical point but x=1 is definitely worth keeping in mind

#

f ' (0) does not equal 0 though

short hare
#

hm?

winter torrent
#

you have f ' (x) as this right?
6x : x > 1
6 : x < 1

short hare
#

yes

hollow ice
#

for x<1, you have a different definition of f'

#

you cant use 6x there

short hare
#

oh is 0 less than 1?

winter torrent
#

sure is

short hare
#

my bad

crystal dawn
hollow ice
short hare
hollow ice
#

no one said it is...

short hare
#

undefined...??

hollow ice
#

undefined what? where?

short hare
#

if we set f'(x) = 0, we get 6=0

#

what does that mean

hollow ice
#

doesnt mean anything

#

f' is never 0 anywhere

#

for your choice of f

short hare
#

so the only critical point is at x= 1

crystal dawn
#

um, car? f'(x) = 0 doesn't mean you get to auto-sub x = 0

short hare
#

I mean- yeah true but where are you getting that form

crystal dawn
#

you saw f'(x) = 0 and you somehow got 6=0
from your earlier confusion I deduced that you had to be using x = 0, which lies in the second definition of f'(x), giving you 6

short hare
#

the piece i was incorrectly usng was f'(x) = 6x whicwhen =0 means x=0

crystal dawn
#

oh lol ok

short hare
#

I can be silly sometimes 🤩

short hare
#

yeah

#

I usually dont put ? at the end of my questions

#

so yeah, that was a question

hollow ice
#

yes, thats the only point in the domain of f where the derivative is undefined

short hare
#

great

#

ty bacter, hana and hayley!

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @short hare

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

thorny rune
#

I'm trying to understand convergence radius.
this was on the website i was using. can anyone explain why this is 1?

void fox
#

What definition of limits are you comfortable with? In any case this is immediate because you can bound the difference |(n+1)/n|-1 by taking n as large as you like

thorny rune
#

but it wouldn't (n+1)/n result in a fraction?

void fox
#

What does being a fraction have anything to do with the question

covert inlet
#

Try to think it in this way imo: n is so much bigger than 1 so we can just remove +1. Try to group by n and you will see

thorny rune
wind mason
#

what about algebraically?

#

like do you know epsilon-delta or roughly how to calculate limits algebraically

void fox
#

I think they are probably just doing an intuitive (non-rigorous) definition of limitsa

thorny rune
covert inlet
thorny rune
wind mason
#

like lets say 99999999

#

what’s the remainder on that

wispy river
#

Remainder tends to 0

thorny rune
wind mason
thorny rune
#

like how 1/x could be 0

wind mason
thorny rune
#

ahh

wind mason
#

and the RHS will tend to 1 as n->infinity

wispy river
covert inlet
wind mason
#

because the remainder becomes arbitrarily small

wispy river
thorny rune
#

okay, that makes sense. thanks

covert inlet
#

Try with the calculator: 1/99999, 1/677567577 etc

thorny rune
#

on a side note, does anyone have anything to recommend for learning epsilon - delta?

covert inlet
#

You will see a number that is almost 0

wind mason
#

there’s a neat formula for these kinds of limits of rational functions

wispy river
woven radishBOT
thorny rune
#

how do i practice that?

wind mason
#

Once you experiment with higher orders