#help-27
1 messages · Page 383 of 1
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
<@&268886789983436800>
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would it be sufficient here to prove that this now tends to 0?
mhm
k
good question
based on the term “sequence ratio test” probably not?
hmm
is this where i do scratich work to choose N?
what r u trying to prove
not sum
i like how we have to speculate on the question while the op doesn't respond
the sequence?
sorryy, i was attempoting it 😭
yes
isnt the ratio test for series not sequence
I always get confused behind the intuition of where i choose N
like
I have this rn
[ \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a^{n+1}}{(n+1)!} \cdot \frac{n!}{a^n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a}{n+1} = 0]
Is that even correct approach
k
Yep that was the idea
And im at the part where I’m proving that it’s 0
Does that work?
Ignore scratchwork
your choice of N might not even be in N though?
why not?
oh if a is negative?
yea showing |a|/(n + 1) --> 0 is sufficient
and its easier to then do |a|/n
since |a|/(n + 1) < |a|/n
the choice for N is easier here
wait are we actually trying to write an epsilon proof of this
and like deliberately refusing to acknowledge a/(n+1)->0 as obvious
yes this is kind of the point of an intro analysis course
you can also just do 1/(n + 1) --> 0
💀 let me explain, im on my term 1 of analysis
i mean yeah but also it's so ass to have to prove the analysis equivalent of 2+2=4 each and every single motherfucking time
what, are we also gonna be disallowed from writing a+b+c because we have to make explicit written reference to (+Assoc) every time we rebracket?
you only get to stop doing that when you actually can prove it easily or if he can prove more general statements
why are u geting rage baited 😭
what was rage bait?
this is an analysis course
the whole point is for him to learn how to do these
😭
yeah and they have to do it PROPERLY and assuming NOTHING and doing EVERYTHING BY THE BOOK AND PROPERLY AND WITH THE PROPER (I.E. ENORMOUS) AMOUNT OF BUREAUCRACY
is there anything wrong in doing this? I have an exam coming up, i want to make sure i do my best in these type of qs
nah i am exaggerating for comedic effect atp i shut up now
you should become familiar with this sort of thing
bounding it by something that we can do the eps-N proof easier for
which usually means making the denominator less complicated
oh yea bounding them i see
ah yea i was thinking that, lol i decided to make N = ceiling(|a|/n+1)+ 1 to try to bypass this
but yea ill bound it
We thought you were choking
choose N = |a|/n makes no sense
you're choosing N in terms of epsilon
we want |a|/n < eps
so n > |a|/eps
(if a = 0 the fact that it converges to 0 is trivial)
but still needs to be mentioned
Wdym
nothing
you don't need to split into cases and mention the possibility of a = 0
anyways
you see how i got this?
yes
ok so our choice of N is clear
we take N = |a|/eps
i guess a = 0 is only necessary if you consider N = {1, 2, ...}
yep and then we have from |a|/n+1 < |a|/ n < eps
also why are you saying by archimedian property there exists n thing?
if anything you'd be saying that for N
not n
the n part should go like
thus if n > N then n > |a|/eps and manipulate this to get the inequality we want
oh the archimedian is for the N
wdym
yea fairs that works
like N is a function of epsilon?
no no
nah nvm, this makes sense
alright so we can choose an N > |a|/eps then manipulate it so that |a|/n < eps and hence |a|/n+1 < eps
perfect
just mention that "if n > N" after you choose the N
Yea thats fine
sorry for the confusion 😭, ill probably review these again more often
good idea
.close
Closed by @pastel rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I have a conditionally convergent series of vectors $\sum v_n$, does the set of all possible rearrangement sums have to be a linear subspace?
Idts - take $\left(\frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}, \frac{1}{2^n} \right)$.
Civil Service Pigeon
The second coordinate is absolutely convergent, so its sum is $1$ under any rearrangement. But the series $\sum \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}$ can be rearranged to converge to any real number.
Civil Service Pigeon
no origin -> not a subspace
take this with a grain of salt though
not perfectly fluent in this content
nah looks solid

Though I believe it will be an affine subspace
I get that but like
my worry is about what happens when the "conditionalness" isn't confined to the first few slots if you can put it that way
So you want every coordinate to be exactly conditionally convergent
And none are absolutely convergent
Fine, take ((-1)^(n+1)/n, (-1)^(n+1)/n + 1/2^n)
I actually just looked it up earlier and apparently Kadet found a series in L^2 where the set of rearrangement sums consists of exactly two distinct points {x, y}
That completely breaks the affine intuition, right
Hmmm
can you share \
That still gives you a line though riht
One second im trying to find the paper online i just snuffed this from stack exchange thing
Also why the opencry anywyas?
L^2 is euclidean right
Yeah
I'm confused, if you look at one component, either it's absolutely convergent, or it can take on any real value by rearrangement
So if there's 2 possible points of convergence, the component in the direction of their difference is not absolutely convergent
I have a stupid question if I had a polyhedron with infinite sides and faces would it be considered a sphere or nah and why?
! occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
ok sry
Yeah i think I got it. I was just under a misapprehension I think
Thanks
.close
Closed by @sand quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hii
for which, x?
i mean. those are the same equation
but you have 1t+0 on one side and 2t on the other (which we relabel as s)
wait im a bit confused
i don't even know how he got here I'll be honest can u explain?
do you know what a skew line is? can you explain it to me?
when two lines are not intersecting and never parallel
okay, great
so we want to find out whether they're intersecting
we have l1 (t) and l2 (t)
we want to figure out if we can feed numbers into each of these to give us the same point
but they could be different numbers as input so it's confusing that we use t for both
so instead we use s as input for l2
so l2(s) = (2s)i - sj - sk
and l1(t) = ti + tj + (t+1)k
oh yeah
the ijk thing is basically just another way of writing <a, b, c>
Closed by @idle dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
❤️
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find the least positive integer $n$ such that $\frac{1}{\sin(45^\circ)\sin(46^\circ)}+\frac{1}{\sin(47^\circ)\sin(48^\circ)}+\dots+\frac{1}{\sin(133^\circ)\sin(134^\circ)}=\frac{1}{\sin(n^\circ)}$
ihave<skissue>
yeah... legit no idea where to start
actually wait
product to sum gets
$\frac{2}{\cos(2^\circ)}\left(\frac{1}{\cos(91^\circ)}+\frac{1}{\cos(95^\circ)}+\dots+\frac{1}{\cos(267^\circ)}\right)$
fuck
Extra bracket with the first cos
ty
ihave<skissue>
🤔
smells like a telescopic
ohh wait
pair cos(x) with cos(180+x) or smth?
wait noo
it just flips signs and won’t collapse the sum

try rewriting 1/(sin x · sin(x+1°)) as a difference of cotangents because sums of successive differences naturally telescope causing almost all intermediate terms to cancel
or you can rewrite as difference of cosines which would be harder i think
sorry something came up, lemme try
naturally im guessing like cot(x)-cot(x+1)
so like (cos(x)sin(x+1)-sin(x)cos(x+1))/(sin(x)sin(x+1))
top is sin((x+1)-x)=sin(1)?
yes that's correct
so
$$\frac{1}{\sin(1)}(\cot(45)-\cot(46)+\cot(47)-\cot(48)+\dots+\cot(133)-\cot(134))$$
shouldn't it be 1/sin 1
oh yea
ihave<skissue>
yes exactly
so whats left is (cot(45)+cot(90))/sin(1)
the first is 1, the second is 0, so were left with 1/sin(1), so n=1?
wait the uncancelled terms are cot 45 and cot 134
46 cancels 134 no?
nvm sorry
You got it
Anflo, me, both confirm it
oh wait
ok ic i summed it wrong
okay then, thank you guys!
.solved
Closed by @solid osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ideas on approaches for this
can we try a recursive decomposition by initial patterns?
ythe combinatorics becomes clearer once the first few bits are fixed
A what 🙂
oh i just mean split the strings into cases based on how they start (like 00 01 10 11) and see how each case reduces to a shorter problem
Ah
As in
If 00, all strings of length 2^n-2 work
If 01, all a_n-2 work
If 10, all strings of length 2^n-3
if 11, same as 01
Wasn’t this solved by that person who posted it originally himself
Their thought was dividing it into two cases 0x and 1x, and divide the first 0x case into two sub cases 00x and 01x
So you'd get as a recurrence a_n = 2^n-2 + 2a_n-2 + a_n-1?
I think that's different from what they got
yeahh that's much cleaner
Ah
So theirs was correct
yes
strings starting with 11 are counted both in the 11 case and inside the broader 1x case
Oh I see what happened
By separating them I create a problem
Okay
So I would get a_n = 2^n-2 + 2a_n-2 + 2^n-3
Which is the same as theirs with one term expanded
Wait no it's not
Dangit
I feel like my cases shouldn't have any overlap anymore
So why aren't they equivalent to their cases
your cases still overlap in a hidden way because one of your counts ignores the “must contain 00” condition
Back
Hm
I have
00 + any string of length n-2
01 + any string containing 00 of length n-2
10 + 0 + any string of length n-3
Oh I guess with 10 the 0 need not go there
And then 11
So easier to just hav
00
01
1
Okay, makes sense
.close
Closed by @ionic harness
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So to start $X_1+X_2+X_3 \sim N(0,3)$
wai
And I was looking at solved examples . I don't get how this is equivalent to
$\frac{X_1+X_2+X_3}{\sqrt{3}} \sim N(0,1)$
wai
I feel like that's a theorem somewhere
well, $Var(X_1 + X_2 + X_3) = Var(X_1) + Var(X_2) + Var(X_3) = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3$
I think I got it
south
that’s just variance normalization of a normal random variable
cool
wai
exactl that theorem applies verbatim here, with v=3
So I have $\frac{X_1+X_2+X_3}{\sqrt{ \chi^2(3)}} = \frac{W}{\sqrt{3}} \sim t(3)$
wai
almost
the denominator needs to be sqrt(U/3), not just sqrt(U) Once written that way, it’s exactly a t3
hmm?
I accounted for that I think
[
W = \frac{(X_1+X_2+X_3)/\sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{(X_4^2+X_5^2+X_6^2)/3}}
]
anflo
[
\frac{X_1+X_2+X_3}{\sqrt{X_4^2+X_5^2+X_6^2}}
\sim t_3
]
anflo
Thanks so much!
mhm you're welcome
@lost laurel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lost laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anybody explain how to do this?
Sketch the region enclosed by the given curves. Decide whether to integrate with respect to x or y. Draw a typical approximating rectangle and label its height and width. (Do this on paper. Your instructor may ask you to turn in this graph.)
y = 2x+3, y = 15-x^2,x = -1, x = 2
Plot the graphs
He then asks for area s of the region, which im confused about.
.close
Closed by @loud urchin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the value of x from the following proportion. Help me.
what have you tried
I applied the properties of proportions: (x-1)(x+3)=(x-2)(x+2)
!status @severe iris
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Does the proportionality keep on going in the question?
?
Eh why is there a sudden silence
I'm not sure. I just applied the property $(a/b = c/d \Rightarrow ad = bc)$ to simplify the equation. Should I proceed differently?
YUSUBA
my english so bad
Nah np
Do you know componendo dividendo?
Hii do you know how to expand those brakcets?
that sounds good, now solve for x
I've heard of it, but I prefer using cross-multiplication for this one as it feels more straightforward to me.
Parentheses?
No but it is easier
À
But if ur getting the answer like that then you can apply the old method?
E cứ nhân nó vào là đc e
( and ) [In the US specifically, for some reason, these symbols are referred to as parentheses]
Like what is the doubt then? @severe iris
,w (x-1)(x+3)=(x-2)(x+2)
thanks.
@severe iris Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @severe iris
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why, in the definition of the line integral, is the vector field defined from A ⊂ Rn to Rn, and not in a space of a different dimension?
you need to be able to dot F(gamma(t)) with gamma'(t)
gamma'(t) lives in R^n
F(gamma(t)) lives in the output space of F
so the output space of F also needs to be R^n in order for the dot product to be a thing
@idle coral Has your question been resolved?
thankss
Closed by @idle coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ive trouble with this exercise
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Its in greek
then try to translate
Yep
Let R³(x, y, z) and the change of vars to (u, v, w) with x=uv, y=exp(v), z=w. Where is this change okay and how can i express the basis (∂u ∂v ∂w) on the basis (∂x ∂y ∂z) with coefficients with respect to (x, y, z)
The other way round is easy, so do the other direction and take inverse?
For the first qs i don't know which F to use, like the (u, v, w) to (x, y, z) or the inverse. Theres no problem with the det whichever i use, i know, but whats the right option
Like the inverse is (1/v, -u/ve^v, 0; 0, 1/e^v, 0; 0,0,1). You just rewrite every entries in terms of x,y,z
Like v=ln(y)
u=x/v=x/ln(y)
w=z
Well yes, like we let v≠0 so thath det≠0
Which is equivalent to y≠1
For the second question
Yeah
(∂u ∂v ∂w)=J(f(id)^(-1)))(∂x ∂y ∂z)
Bec (R³,id) is the chart for coord (x, y, z)
And f(u, v, w)=(x, y, z) as above
Is this right?
Yeah
Okay
Me problem is
This holds for every p on R³ like (∂u|p ∂v|p ∂w|p)
So p now is on (x, y, z) or (u, v, w)
How i express it?
Because we have Also (∂x|p ∂y|p ∂z|p)
Oh… I have no idea when p=(u,0,w)….
What do umean
I mean we solved it when v isn’t 0. My reasoning fails when v=0 so no idea how to proceed at this case
Lets take that v≠0 equiv y≠1
Now, p is like (x, y, z) or (u, v, w)
Its a point in R³ but how i express it
No idea… Probably you can reply to that 1/0=infty guy
Ok, thanks for your help
Let R³(x, y, z) and the change of vars to (u, v, w) with x=uv, y=exp(v), z=w. Where is this change okay and how can i express the basis (∂u ∂v ∂w) on the basis (∂x ∂y ∂z) with coefficients with respect to (x, y, z)
@gritty saddle Has your question been resolved?
@gritty saddle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone tell me whether my proof of transitivity is formally correct? I think it should be because I don't see any mistakes in my implications, but the master solution did it with more case distinctions which seems unnecessary to me. But then again the professor would probably find the better solution than me, so maybe i did sth. wrong.
Is my question inappropriate for this server or why the emojis? are these kind of questions not intended for this?
.close
Closed by @wanton axle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to solve this equality but I cant get any further than making one polynominal and then moving the 3 to the other side and idk if there is any other way tbh
factor the x^2 - 2x -8
x(x-2)-8?
wait im bumb
yes, moving the 3 to the other side and then trying to factor the resulting polynomial sounds like the way, what was the polynomial you got after doing that?
x^3 + 4x^2 - 20x - 51
if i got it right
rational root theorem
already substracted the 3
hm not sure, there is a formula for solving general cubics but im sure thats not whats called for here 🤔
how did this problem come up?
it doesnt seem to be something with "nice solutions"
when looking at a graph
and if this was the problem to begin with, what class was it for?
well...you could use the cubic formula but...
thats not the most fun or productive way lol
well that's actually what made me doubt so much, didnt expect to get answers other than full 'nice' numbers
just memorize this and ur good @open cargo
it's easier to just depress / reduce and then work out in terms of roots of unity
but i think that is not something you'll learn before taking something like galois theory, so it is a bit dubious
despite being elementary
oh my days ion even think i learned that so might as well just leave this aside (?)
except if thats the only solution tho
thanks the lord
oh i see
😅
by who/from where ?
yoooo hi acman
o/
been years...
yeah it's not a formula thats NOT taught in schools, maybe mentioned in some "history of math" or esoteric algebra college courses but no one is gonna memorize that 😛
basically a bunch of exercises from uni (given by my teacher)
the history of the discovery of that formula is actually kinda interesting and dramatic though
it was a closely guarded secret used for "mathematical contests" for some while or some such
wow, might wanna learn about it once I'm back on tracks with the basics
okay but if none of y'all got any "nice" solutions then I might have been right the whole time and been doubting for no reasons hahaha
thanks for the help guys!
but anyway the point is in general cubic equations are difficult to solve
unless there's some special factoring trick or special case
.close
Closed by @open cargo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Leibnitz's mistake
I don't understand why can't we count (6, 6) and (6, 6) as two different solutions
Like, number wise, it's the same.
But if (5, 6) != (6, 5), then (6, 6) != (6, 6)
idk now sounds silly
because these both say the same thing
i didn’t know leibniz was this foolish
i usually like to think in terms of a first and second die roll
it’s the same as rolling them “at the same time”
huh whats going on here
Yeah idk what I was thinking. I mean I do, but I now understand why that wouldnt be true
me too
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@north glen Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help pls do i have to do another integration by parts or do i do something to simplify
I mean if you want to there is a real easy way to get around it
pls
you know about taylor expansions?
no
darn okay
just by parts
no I mean for like functions
like do you know about like series expansions of functions?
we havent learned taylor yet just standrd integration and integration by parts
like binomial expaniosians?
modulus?
nope
yeah i dont know i was told to only use by parts for this
explicitly
and i dont rlly know how'
oh
i think my teach wants to us to suffer
well if you have to do by parts just pick dv=e^{5x]dx
i did
but using uv -(integralsign) vdu the vdu is like aids
its like 1/5e^5x*-5sin5x
new u and dv?
also the 5's cancel
how
oh yeah lol
and the negative cancels out the - from the uv - equation
from the 1/5 and -5 cancelling out
right?
$$\int e^{5x}\cos(5x)dx=\frac{1}{5}\cos(5x)e^{5x}+\int e^{5x}\sin(5x)dx$$
$$\int e^{5x}\cos(5x)dx=\frac{1}{5}\cos(5x)e^{5x}+\frac{1}{5}\sin(5x)dx-\int e^{5x}\cos(5x)dx$$
$$2\int e^{5x}\cos(5x)dx=\frac{1}{5}\cos(5x)e^{5x}+\frac{1}{5}\sin(5x)dx$$
$$\int e^{5x}\cos(5x)dx=\frac{1}{10}\cos(5x)e^{5x}+\frac{1}{10}\sin(5x)dx+C$$
and becokes postivve
Calisto
yee
but the short cut is this
$$e^{i5x}=cos(5x)+isin(5x)$$
$$e^{-i5x}=cos(5x)-isin(5x)$$
$$e^{i5x}+e^{-i5x}=2\cos(5x)$$
$$\int e^{5x(1+i)}+e^{5x(1-i)}dx=\frac{1+i}{10} e^{5x(1+i)}+\frac{1-i}{10} e^{5x(1-i)}$$
where is 1/5 sin coming from
the second integration by parts
Calisto
ok ty
yee
As a way to check your understand of this integral see if you can do this one:
$$\int e^{ax}x^2dx$$
Calisto
this one uses the same concepts
but after that one see if you can find a solution to this one
$$\int e^{ax}x^ndx$$
Calisto
what's the equation?
oh.... oh boy okay let's see here
you definitely want to start off by getting rid of the radicals but that's gonna be tricky
@warm cloud Has your question been resolved?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
I am 95% sure that person was a troll

Yes they were muted
,w cbrt(n+sqrt(n^2+8))+cbrt(n-sqrt(n^2+8))=8
not a terrible solution
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont know how to start for Question A
,rccw
Do you know what a standard matrix is
@covert umbra Has your question been resolved?
Yeah the columns are $T(e_1)$, $T(e_2)$, and $T(e_3)$ (in that order)
Civil Service Pigeon
You’re given $T(e_1)$ so that’s easy
Civil Service Pigeon
To find $T(e_2)$ and $T(e_3)$, we should use the properties of $T$ since it’s (presumably) a linear transformation
Civil Service Pigeon
Do you remember the definition of a linear transformation?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Really sorry but very lost here
yes
so their sample means are exactly normal
We can work directly with normal dist Y bar - X bar
hmm,how do I do that
What do you mean how
What are the distributions of the sample means
figure that out first
normal, right
I'll continute this in a bit, brain is nto braining
thanks
.close
Closed by @lost laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Use the pigeonhole principle to show that sum of any two elements from any of the six-element subsets of the set ${1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}$ will be greater than 10.
Sean
i dont remember the question correctly guys, this is the closest recollection that i can recall
With the Pigeonhole Principle (PHP), we first choose boxes, what do you think would be best
okay what is the least greatest number in a set
5
wat is it then
6
list out pairs of numbers that make sum 11
starting from 5,6 which is the first pair
[You're using the pigeonhole principle to prove that you can't construct a subset that does not have the desired property]
You've now got boxes [1], [2,9], [3,8], [4,7] and [5,6]
how does this work
sure
how do i proceed
why is 1 a box btw?
You can go 5 boxes, 6 pigeons
because we can freely pick 1 without problem
why is that?
It (the number 1) doesn't change whether we can make an 11-sum <----------
what do these boxes represent, are they subsets?
they're your literal pigeonholes
if you choose two elements from one of the pigeonhole, then the sum becomes 11 - this means our condition is true
Meaning maximally you can pick ONE element from each pigeonhole
But there're only 5 pigeonholes; and you need 6 pigeons (elements)
Guys I'm sorry but I am not getting it
I mean I know that the php is about n+1 pigeons and n pigeons
But I can't understand how this applies here
Prerequisite - do you know how the pigeonhole principle works?
Well yeah I did a bunch of problems about picking colored objects and stuff
But this one is kinda different
Right - in this case we need to make the boxes ourselves
I did some problems with ceil(N/k)
The thing is, when we make boxes, we need to make "being in the same box" have some specific property
Ok so if you pick two elements from one of the boxes, the sum exceeds 10, you agree? (dont mind the sloppy arrangement)
Okay, but why do we choose the pairs of numbers having sum = 11 as the boxes?
because 11>10, which is the question
Because, see here, this is the property we want the boxes to have
why not 12
It can be 11, but not 10 and may or may not be 12. 1,2,3,4,5,6 for example
Because it suffices to show that there must be two numbers that sum to 11
okay so we are using php to show that any two elements from six elem subset sum to 11?
yes
alright so now I can pick like the 'two' elements as the boxes
So your elements are the pigeons
you have to pick atleast one box where both elements are included
i can do 2,9 and 3,8 and 4,7 and 5,6
These boxes are the pigeonholes
You can fill each box with exactly one pigeon
But then you still have an extra pigeon
So I need to prove that when we pick the pigeons at least one of the box will have two pigeons
yes
which is the equivalent of having two numbers summing to 11
yes
Right
But i want to have only these boxes
1 is kinda unintuitive
You've got an extra box, though
Because when picking the fifth element, you can freely allow it to be 1
You can't make 11 with that 1, because you don't have a 10 to match it with
If we don't have 1 as a box then we do not have any place to accomodate when we choose 1 from the set
ig that is why i need a box for [1]
1 is a box with only one possible element. You either pick it or not
You dont need ceiling function tbh
mb its 2
6>5 suffices
Try and learn this principle first
but we do it that way
Okay then go on
what if i was asked sum > 11
That's not true
What
Counterexample: take the set of 1 through 6 inclusive
alright lets do 7 element subset
That works
Then yes
yeah
"6,6"?
it is a set
yh
ok well then what should i do?
it's going to be a one-element box
1 and 6, two one-element boxes?
[1], [2], [6], [5,7], [8,4], [9,3]
These are my boxes
And I have 7 pigeons
Somethings missing
alr
so now we have ceil(7/6) = 2
yeah. So this means atleast one pigeonhole has 2 pigeons
Can you explain the boxes thing a bit more
what part
well the sum questions would all have the same pattern
do you remember any other type of question
so i could practice
makin boxes yk
I can give you some examples, basic geometry is fine?
lets say you have a square of length 3 * 3, and 10 points, we need to show that atleast two points have distance less than square root 2
the points lie inside the square. try this. And for more just google
shit that's a good question tho
im ded
Its a slightly hard example, its fine if we fine skip it actually
10 points at random?
just google PHP questions
so i have to find 9 pairs of points with distance < sqrt(2) ?
one pair of points
The trick is to determine what boxes to draw
(and hint - "box" is very literal in this example)
yeah once you get the boxes, its a baby problem
why do i need just a single pair?
atleast two points
i mean if i am choosing 10 points then i gotta have 4 pairs at least
I have a sample question that's along the same lines
You're misunderstanding the question
or maybe 6 pairs
let me know after this if you're down
so we have more than 10 points
Sometimes you wont know the boxes directly
If you pick 10 points randomly, there ALWAYS exists A pair of points that is less than root(2) apart; the question is to prove THIS
like the previous question was direct
Send it here, I will take a look thanks
goddamn
Where do I even start
think along a box
I have to pick 10 points or smth
hint, you have to make the boxes/pigeonholes yourself and then place the points in them
you are given seven line segments of random lengths. you know that they all are between 1 and 10 inches long, inclusive. show that there exists at least one set of three lines that you can use to form a triangle.
Woud drawing a graph help
anyway uhh now how to check that root 2 thing
I want you to think
lets say you have a square of length 3 * 3, and 10 points, we need to show that atleast two points have distance less than square root 2
Spend some drawing different kinds of boxes
we are gonna pick 10 points so we have 10 pigeons
what are ways to divide a square into at most 9 parts - that helps proving the question
where did 9 come from
well with PHP, the number of pigeonholes is less than pigeons
alright I will try it and tell you if I managed to complete it lmao
dont wanna keep u here for long
Whats special about root 2 and a square @gray oriole
Try connecting root 2 to something first
what
well
root 2 is a number and square is a shape
lmao
uhhhh
unit square has diagonal root 2
its got the jelly
the points we need
And following on from that:
If two points were in the same unit square, what could you argue about the distance between them?
shi idk
i mean
think in terms of max and min
max dist is root 2 ig
yay
now think about what boxes/pigeonholes we should choose
i think you got this
do i have to draw like unit squares in that big square
there will be 9 unit squares that fit into tat
oh WOW
well uhh if i choose 10 points then there will be at least two points that are in the same square
(same bucket)
yez
cuz there are 9 squares
alr well y'all arent gonna be in the exam
i didnt do anything in this
now you can search for more examples on google/firefox/whatever
Combinatorics questions are all about practice
you did it almost by yourself
we just gave hints
if you wanna try mine, it's kinda along the same lines
You need exposure to a variety of problems, is all
sure
triangle inequality
Well if we are picking three lines then do we need two boxes?
look at the last example. We had to choose 2 points only
well we had 10 points and we had 9 squares
yes
a square has infinite points
Now how many pigeons do we have?
in the prev problem?
this problem
7?
yeah and how many do we want to choose
3
yes now think
no but why are we not picking 3 lines
i mean we are given 7, and out of those we gotta pick 3 such taht everytime the three make a triangle
if this is untrue then i might be misunderstanding smth here
yes
so some pigeonhole must contain 3 points.
how many pigeonholes can we have now?
well if we have 7 pigeons
also check these out : https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=Pigeonhole_Principle
do i have to solve ceil(7/k) = 3
@gray oriole Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gray oriole
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that among any ten points located inside a circle with diameter 5, there exist at least two at a distance less than 2 from each other.
To apply the PHP, I need to draw 9 regions within the circle such that the distance of any two points in that region is < 2. But I am not sure how to draw those regions.
I think I might have to draw a circle with radius 2
but what about the other 8 regions
maybe place that circle of radius 2 at the center
how can you place the other 8 around it in a nice way? maybe that way will work
yes
,w plot x^2 + y^2 = 25 and x^2 + y^2 = 4
the outer circle has radius 2.5 btw
Well if you make a rule that says two points cannot be less than 2 units apart, then every point gets their own “circle of protection”. That circle of protection has a radius 2.
So I would look at how many circles can fit inside the 5, then look how many more points you’re left over (that would otherwise be forced to break the rule if placed).
root 5
no what
oh it says diameter 5
If i end with even one extra section then how will i apply php
rn im tryna go for 9 sections, ceil(10/9) = 2
if i end up with 10 i will have to do ceil(10/10) = 1
Hmm. Ratio maybe?
Area of big circle
Area of small circle.
But that doesn’t account for points that are near the circumference and a portion of the small circle is outside the big circle, so here I’m a little unsure.
Maybe create another regional circle within this 5 circle with radius 3, then ask yourself how many semicircles fit between the 3 and 5.
I’m just imagining but not applying php. In terms of php, I assume it’s a play of ratios. My input is arguably amateur unfortunately
I reluctantly checked the solution
welp
Closed by @gray oriole
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i used kings rule and stuff and got it to
f(t) = pi integral dx/(1- cos^2 t sin^2x) from 0 to pi
how to proceed from here
divide by sin²(x)
then sub cot(x) because you have csc²(x) in the numerator
?
sin²/sin² = 1
oh shit lol
This kind of trick is hard to see if you don't have enough experience, so you just need to be aware of it
Here's another example that is less obvious to spot $$\int\frac{x\sin(x)+1+\cos(x)}{(x+\sin(x))^2}dx$$
cosec^2 x/(1+cot^2 - cos^2t)
cot x = y
-cosec^2 x dx = dy
-dy/(1+y^2 - cos^2t)
Roy
Ayo, our variable t is already taken
You don't wanna be mixing it up
oh wth here also we have to do the same thing?
Dividing by cos²(x) gets the job done quickly
Very hard to come up with if you don't know the trick already
i have done this before but i usually convert to sec instead of cosec
So just be aware of it
yeah that happens when you divide cos
👍 ohk got it
huh but in our limit we have cot 0 and cot pi
which are both undefined
ohk we can make it 2pi integral (-dy)/(1+y^2-cos^2 t)
from infinity to 0
2pi integral dy/(1+y^2-cos^2t) from 0 to infinity
@grand edge is this fine?
it should be, although I haven't been working out the integral since I'm preparing to go to sleep
Closed by @rare kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I've a statsd question
I first tried to calculate the probability of NOT having 2 6's. All the possible outcomes are ${61\choose 12}$. Since 72 minus de 11 6's equals 61. Then we choose 12 dice.
Chuti | Argentina
Then, the possible combinations we can get without restrictions, are ${72\choose 12}$. So the end probability is $1-\frac{{61\choose 12}}{{72\choose 12}}$
Chuti | Argentina
But this isnt the solution given in the book and I don't understand why.
you sample space should be 6^12 and there is no other reasonable one to use honestly
is your sample space not 6^12?
Looks like it is. Just draw the tree of possibilities and it's a tree of height 12, where each node has 6 edges.
So I guess it it.
So then the probability of NOT having a single 6, is 5^12, then we want to calculate the probability of having only one 6, since that's the maximum we can have?
that’s what the book does
the (72 choose 12) size sample space thing doesn’t work because…
so what's the probability of having at least one 6?
I thought these kind of problems were easy lol
idk why I'm having such a hard time.
well let’s imagine 2 dice for simplicity. and we ask what’s the probability of no 6s. now with the 12 choose 2 sample space perspective it’s like we have a bag with 1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6 in it and we just choose 2 of them. but that’s different than rolling two dice. our first choice should not influence the second
but it does here when we choose 2 out of those 12
