#help-27
1 messages · Page 367 of 1
hmm
yea but learning it takes more than passively consuming some videos
I did a few problems
actually i knew how to do calc way b4 gr 10, i just use it as a reference for the easiest things i be doing on the most simple math problems
like i was taking practice tests and doing 40 question long mcq pages per unit
Ui + Ki = Uf + Kf if theres no non conservative forces
after reading a textbook and watching khan academy videos
to learn physics you need to do problems
not just glance at the formulas and watch a few videos
I did do rpoblems
I did the problems at the end of the chapter
princeton review textbook
they were alr I could do more problems tho
oh those books can be pretty quick actually
yeh
i didn’t use them to learn the material though
I watched a organic chemistry tutor video at 1.5x speed
aswell
then did the textbook
exact same concepts
some examples
true yeah
i forgot where but i had like 30-40 mcq questions per unit for those two physics classes
college board questions
yea
or 3 units a week
i was literally doing it 12 hours a day
uhh idk what my pace was like
i think i was doing around 1 unit a day
🤔
yeah school teaches slow af
yea i think it was 1 unit a day now that i think about it
indeed
you got 5 on both exams?
but I don't do early admissions
and I actually lock in next year
bro my school only lets grade 12s do calc/physics 2 exams usually
i mean if it’s just english then it shouldn’t hurt you that bad
so if I can self study these 2 and get 5s
next year will be pretty much guaranteed 98% gpa
it’s more important that you have great letters imo and grades in stem
cuz I'll just be doing review of the shit i self studied next year
which teacher do I glaze then
physics?
idk
I handed in two of my labs late
2/2 labs late
i got letters from my ap calc teacher, ap chem teacher, and ap physics c mech teacher
do you try getting letters from grade 12 teachers
or grade 11
it might be too late for grade 11 bruh
well there was some overlap for me
I slept in biology already
hmmm
my math teacher
idk
theres like fucking 40 people in my class
i mean if you’re really this physics enthusiast then shouldn’t your teacher be aware of this
lmao idk
I only started learning physcis this year tbf
he said no one has gotten 100% on one of his ap physics tests before
so maybe I could be the one\
I doubt it though those AP questions are kinda conceptual af
😭
idk
i mean it’s not like getting a 100 on the ap exam
it’s just a classroom test
idk
that’s dumb as hell
so we're tryna learn from cirriculum
the cirruculum and ap physics
overlap like
5 units I believe
curriculum
6 units
then they teach you some ap topics at the end
so I was thinking
I do really good on all his ap tests
then after the semester ends
I go up to him in practice sessions
for literally no reason
and ask a bunch of questions
for literally no reason
and maybe he'll see how hard working I am!
i mean don’t say stupid shit
I already slept in my biology class
but biology is full year
hmmm
I think its still recoverable
i think
hmm I also have
chemistry tomororw
NO
not tomorrow
next semester
idk who my teacher is
but maybe that
I just do competitive math problems
but these 2 days not rly
did you take the exam last week
AMC?
yea
no
should’ve
BECAUSE
there was a strike from the teachers
from literally eaerly october
all the way to just past the deadline
so there was no timeframe to even sign up
tried emailing but they were locked out of accounts
I took another one though
I think I did horrible
hmm
Yeah I did horrible because the exam rules tell you to do everything in exact values
unfortunate
but
I didn't really know what to do for uh
geometry that required trig functions that weren't exact values
like 37 degrees or some shit
yeah
wait
I know I got the right answer
but I just wrote
the entire fucking solution
in a single equation
so think of all the adding/subtracting/similar triangles
all in one fucking equation
and when you enter it into your calculator
you get the exact value
okay sorry
I'm yapping
engineering
yes
all my siblings
figured
majored in engineering too
biomedical engineering for one
electrical engineer for other
i mean
mechanical engineer for other
if you don’t want to be a professor
then it might not be a bad idea to just do engineering
and take math classes as a second major or minor
like a math professor
I'd just be a professor
like I wouldn't accopmlish any generational shit
just a professor
big if here
which is kinda sad
getting into a good phd program is hard enough and then to land a good position as a professor is even worse no
like
yea probably not
yeah
yeah I don't feel like its worth it
I'm better off becoming a doctor or sum
similar amount of years
4x higher salary on average
i mean there are things you can do with a math background other than research at university
i mean i took it in class but i wouldn’t say i actually learned it in class
how long is it gonna take me to learn
my situation was that i learned it the summer prior and just did homework in class then fucked off to do whatever i wanted
eh this depends
i think if you’re really dedicated you can learn it quite quickly
I'm like
but you’re also juggling it with other things
80% dedicated
yeah
mostly just biology
and physics
biology I don't think it's rly that bad
and also the other course
i mean just put whatever time you have available towards it and don’t worry about how long it takes tbh
it shouldn’t take that long
why not just start now
coz like I said I gotta self study rest of physics 1 and all of physics 2
yeah I did start now
what
I learned limits
and continuity
this weekend
i think I know a few things about derivatives
just from being around math a lot
I know the power rule
might know chain rule
rolles theorem
but eh not that much
in depth
are you using a book or just watching bprp
don’t think that’s sufficient to fully learn something tbh
ill practice with past mcqs frqs too
and search practice tests
n stuff
I think by the end of the year
I'll probably
lets see
I think done differentiation and onto integrals
then by march def done everything
along with review and whatnot
.close
.close
.closed
Closed by @cunning valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Closed by @cunning valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.solved
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wwhy is understandinf how f f' f'' so hard
i need some like ways to make it easier to understand
Just to kinda ask the stupid question:
Do you know how f' relates to f? Like, what f' is describing?
f' is slop
e
is this a good way to memorize for ap test
like the middle part of it
@crimson nova Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @crimson nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How does one get to the first step?
no worries
@carmine elm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
I know where to begin
I have begun!
If you did some work on the problem already, please show, even through photos
I think the intersection of intervals are important
if piecewise the function is continuous, then it is continuous
for example at x=-1 the first two pieces should connect
and at x=2 the second two
and each fn part be continuous
smooth?
Correct so far
Using this information we can set up an equality
Same thing for x=2
@fierce matrix Has your question been resolved?
@fierce matrix Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fierce matrix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys! Can anyone explain to me how to study the convergance of the following
Oh yeah limit is attempting infinity
How would i use the squezze theorem
For this
-1 ≤ sinx ≤ 1
Huh
Multiply all three parts with (x+1)/(2x+1)
Yup
aha! Thank you so much!! I get it now
(x is approaching infinity 😉 )
Cool
Sorry, i learn this thing in french
Yeah don't worry, I just corrected so that you can learn the right term 🤗
@drowsy vessel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I made some changes but now some boxes are empty. Can someone let me know if something’s wrong because I feel like there shouldn’t be 3 empty boxes and duplicates but I couldn’t find anything for root test
Everything for root test seems like it has a better spot or ends up equaling 1 and being inconclusive
there are multiple possible spots for most of these
are there any rules for how you should prefer one to the other
No the top part is the only instruction
then as long as the box you put it in works they shouldn't mark it wrong
Ok
for example P can go to the bottom right but it's a more annoying test
geometric series is literally root test
and ratio
Closed by @waxen hawk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I feel like I understand why it's true conceptually (e.g. f(x) = x^3 at x=0) but I'm not sure how to formally write a solid proof for this
Write a limited development around that point and use the argument on x^3
wdym limited development
taylor’s formula i guess
seems like a french expression 😭
Yes I always forget
so this might be a bad question but how do I do that 😔
this is taylor's formula from my lecture notes
$$f(x+h) = (d^3f(x)/6)h^3 +o(h^3)$$
Tell me about the behaviour of d^3f(x) then conclude by comparing it to the residual when close to x
bourbactive
Is what you're trying to go at is, depending on what direction h is, the value of f could go up or down?
hence it's not a local extremum
(this is kind of just a guess tbh based on the result we're trying to prove)
Yes that's it. It will either increase or decrease around X because x^3 changes sign around 0
@thin fern Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @thin fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help either #5
To graph (a) you need to know the general shape of curves in the form 1/x
and plug in nice values of x to get points that are easy to graph
for example x=4 gives you f(4)=5
x=2 gives you f(2)=3
So how can you find those nice points, and also what is the general shape of this equation?
This is $y=\frac{1}{x}$
flynger
Why is there two lines?
lets look at numbers x > 0
1 / x is positive if x is positive
does that make sense?
and since we're doing division, the smaller the number we divide by, the bigger the result 1 / x is
1 / 0.1 is bigger than 1 / 1 which is bigger than 1 / 10
so it gets bigger as you go from x = 1 to x = 0.5 to x = 0.1
and smaller when you divide by a bigger number
Ah ok so when its negative it keeps shrinking and from positive it keeps shrinking but im wondering why its not just one line
10?
100
1/0.001
1000
so as you get close to x=0 from right, 1/x goes to infinity
So will continuously go hugher as it gets closer to 0 but it will never reach zero?
Ok so how would i go about graphing this with these other numbers in the equation?
first ill answer this
for negatives its the opposite
1 / -0.1 = -10
1 / -0.01 = -100
1 / -0.001 = -1000
and on and on
so it goes down forever to -infinity
when you approach 0 but from the negative side
thats why theres two curves as they are not connected
Ah ok and so i was thinking to read this as graphing form but im not sure if it is
do you know what happens for a function $f(x)$ if you graph $f(x-a)$ instead?
flynger
you are subtracting every x by a
Uh im a little lost
lets say we have a line
f(x)=x
if you look at f(x)-1 that is equal to x - 1 right?
so the y value is subtracted by 1 at every point
we brought the graph down by 1
Yea sorry i meant $f(x)-1$
flynger
have you learnt quadratics yet?
Ye
flynger
What will happen if I graph $y=f(x)+3$ instead?
flynger
It will move up three
yes exactly!
So how do we move it horizontally?
the secret is instead of changing $f$ which returns the y-value from the outside we have to change the input $x$
flynger
For example if I want to move the graph to the right by 1
So would it be f(x-1?
flynger
In the equation that didnt happen
This same logic applies for our graph $f(x)=\frac{1}{x}$
flynger
What will $f(x)-1$ look like if the below is $f$
flynger
Shift left 1
flynger
we're changing the output value $y$ not the input
flynger
it will go down by 1 because we are subracting by 1
I'm saying if $y$ was equal to that INSTEAD of $f(x)$
flynger
So if we subtract the right side of $y=f(x)$ to get a different graph
flynger
flynger
Yes but im just wondering how to do the the equation f(x)=1/x-3+4
ok then answer this real quick
$g(x)=f(x)+b\$
$h(x)=f(x-a)$
flynger
How are $g,h$ related to $f$?
flynger
H(x) is minus whatever compared to f and on the x axis g(x) is plus whatever on the y axis compared to f
We would say
$g$ is the graph of $f$ moved up by $b$
$h$ is the graph of $f$ moved right by $a$
flynger
if the $b$ was negative then we are moving down by -b
flynger
Ok so how would we do my problem
if the $a$ was negative then we are moving left by -a
flynger
How is $\frac{1}{x-3}$ related to $\frac{1}{x}$
flynger
So its shifted left three up 4?
Cus i wasnt sure if its that or just up 4 for a y intercept
its shifted right because everything copies the value 3 from its left in the graph $\frac{1}{x}+4$
flynger
Ok and because the a value isnt negative its not flipped?
yes since a is positive its to the right
if it was $\frac{1}{x+3}$ that would be 3 to the left
flynger
But thats the explanation of how the 3 and 4 translate the graph
to draw it
just plot points 1 or 2 apart
until it starts to look like the graph of 1/x
Ok and now for the second one do i just plug in points that can be fully rooted?
flynger
into the square root
what's the domain?
what numbers can you take the square root of
Can you take the square root of $-3$, $0$, $3$? what makes sense
flynger
you should say stretches vertically by 3
because it could also be stretched horizontally, you should specify
And in your homework below, $\infty$ is not a number, so you should not do $=$
flynger
Never do something like $x \le \infty$
flynger
because $x$ cannot equal $\infty$
flynger
you should do $-\infty < x < \infty$
flynger
@rocky marlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rocky marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Explain why an m × n matrix with more rows than columns
has full rank if and only if its columns are linearly independent.
what's your definition of "full rank"?
in this question full rank means rank = n
by dim col and dim row i guess?
if you want, but now the question becomes how do you compute this "dim col"
i assume you use that to mean the dimension of the column space
col is the span of the columns
row is the span of the columns
if the dimension of the span of the columns is greater than the dimension of the span of the rows
then according to your definition it won't be full rank, no?
$\dim(\text{span}{v_1,...,v_n}) =|B|$ for any basis $B \subseteq {v_1,...,v_n}$
flynger
Thats the basic definition of $\dim$ of a vector space
flynger
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i get help w this
yup
but how do i solve this
when is sine negative? when is cos negative?
sin is negative in the 3rd ad 4th quadrant
cos is negative in the 2nd and 3rd quadrant
ok and which one are they BOTH negative in
3rd quadrant
does it become negative bc you minus both sides by cos?
wdym by 'minus both sides by cos'
actually imn not sure
i wanna know how they become negative
or why they are negative
to chose the quadrant
do you understand this step?
are you familiar with the unit circle as a concept
ok then you have to go learn that
this is already the definition
bc its not really gonna work with some random lady on discord yapping at you about it
but ok let's step back from that
are you familiar with the coordinate plane @potent compass
or the cartesian plane or the xy plane or however you call it
yes
cos(theta) = adj/hyp = x/1 = x
oh yes ik tht
ok right
do you know the quadrants on the plane and can you correlate signs of x & y with quadrants
yes
the idea's the EXACT SAME with trig shit, only now your "x" is called "cos(θ)" and your "y" is called "sin(θ)".
ic
but what makes them negative in the wauestion
to look for the quadrant tht they are negative in
the question says that sin(theta) < 0 and cos(theta) < 0
now using this, you have y < 0 and x < 0
"negative" means the same thing as "less than 0" @potent compass
ohh
tysm
Miss
what about this pls
for number 5.2.2
would i use the angle (2)
to find st
but it doesn’t have a value
@potent compass Has your question been resolved?
assuming you meant the top (2), you can find it by first finding the (1) next to it.
@potent compass Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @potent compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so like if i have an ion its basically just an atom but with or without one or more electrons right?
an ion can also have more electrons than the original atom
it just can't have equal numbers of electrons and protons
so it always has a charge
the proper names for this are cations and anions
ca+ions, if that makes sense
thanks man
so that would have fewer electrons, cause that's less negatively charged
also I think they'll ask you on the test:
atoms and ions have the same number of neutrons and protons
different numbers of electrons
no worries!
.close
Closed by @analog sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you're meant to arrive at your "k + 1" statement from the inductive hypothesis, not conclude it is true without any justification
Hint : $\sum_{i=1}^{k+1} = \sum_{i=1}^k + k + 1$
Matcha
yeah, the key is to always use the inductive hypothesis to show that the inductive step is true
So, we know that $\sum_{i=1}^k = \frac{k(k+1)}{2}$
Matcha
Then we need to use this to achieve $\sum_{i=1}^{k+1} = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}$
Matcha
Got it @gleaming hill
?
mm
You can ping me if you get stuck
Try to write out what $\sum_{i=1}^{k} i$ is
Matcha
@gleaming hill ?
No- I meant write it out, like 1+2+ blah blah
You'd like to understand why this is true right?
Or am I misunderstanding your question 
i didn't know it was like that
but now ik :)
i think i get it
i'll keep the chat open until i solve it, i hope that's fine :)
can i ping you later if i have more problems? @errant harbor
Sure
Yep
i think i solved it
Nice work
Your notation is wrong
@gleaming hill Has your question been resolved?
Wait what would be correct then
@errant harbor
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I had to find the transitional matrix from B canonique to the given B (first line), can somebody tell me if i did it right
@drowsy vessel Has your question been resolved?
@drowsy vessel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Renato
what's G?
i think was cyclic groups and then of order 2n+1
it's the group of nth roots of unity the Gn
can i get a helping hand with 3
so there are two parts to break down here
first the "such as" part with G i asked about
can we figure out what are valid values of n here?
once youve figured that out, how does the summation further restrict the values of n?
any step here you're stuck on?
how
well, we know that whatever group w^6 is an element of, its order must be odd, yeah?
so lets pick a random odd number, say like 5
is w^6 an element of G_5?
yes
what do you get when you simplify it
w^6 = ^{12pi.i/33}
I'm not sure wdym by simplify
w^3^2
w^3 = e^{2.i.pi/11}
w^6 = e^{4.i.pi/11}
yes good
now what
now lets call w^6 = v for convenience
lets take the roots of unity of order 11
can you visualize what the elements look like?
just wk = e^{2k.i.pi/11}
with k in {0,..,11}
you here?
G66 contains G11 is your point?
uhh w^66 is a number
did you mean G66
yes v is in G66
is v in G33?
i just remembered that G66 doesn't help us because we need an odd order
v is in G66 implies G22 is in G11, G33, G44, G55
yeah see the pattern?
no
here
when k=2, we get our v
and so v is in G11
w is in G3, G11, G33
good
er, not G3
write out the elements of G3
is w in there?
oh i went back to read, w isnt in G11 either
let x be in G3, then x = e^{2.k.pi.i/3}
yeah, what k would give us w?
k is an integer so imposible
its in G99
yep!
bingo!
wait
so what are all the orders of G that v can be found in?
which k gives it that v is in G22
just wk = e^{2k.i.pi/22}
k=4 gives us v, yeah?
correct
yes
clear now?
ye
33 | 2n+1
divisibility
is v in G44
no
did you check?
w^6 is in G11 yes or no
yes
ok so now is the pattern clear
no
y
so we should be visualizing a circle when doing these problems
imagine you drew 11 points around in a circle, evenly
starting at z=1 and going counterclockwise
these give us the G11 roots of unity
can you visualize this?
have you done this before?
w is in G33,
w = {2pi.i/33}
w3 ={2.pi.3.i/33} = {2.pi.i/11}
so G11 is contained in G33
ok
ok so, we say that v is an element of G11
because it coincides with one of these 11 points we drew
does this make sense so far?
yes
can you see that we are basically just taking the 11 points and just drawing points in between
we are not taking away or moving any of the existing points
we are simply adding more points in between
this makes sense?
yes
yes
y
can you now see that here with 22, we split the segments between points in 2
but we could have split the segments by any number of points
we could have split each of the 11 regions into 7 parts
making 77 points around the circle
that doesn't change that v coincides with G11
and so adding points without removing points makes it still coincide with G77
following?
sure
so any multiple of 11 works
G44, G55, G66, G77, etc
v is part of all of them
because v is in G11
can we start from the scratch
sure
w is in G33
w^6 after simplification we notice it's in G11
so his conjugate of w^6 is also in G11
oh i didnt even see the conjugate, but fortunately it changes nothing about the problem
now we want this N to be in an odd cyclic group that is divisible by 11
what now? 11 | 2n+1
?
we just did the hard part of the first step
lets now look at the second part, the summation
notice that no matter how you evaluate this sum, you have to start at j=0
and just keep going up
yea?
yeah
ok so now if you want, you can simplify the summand inside the summation
lets do that first, because it will make everything a lot simpler to see
?
either n = 1 or n is not 1
if n is not 1 we can use the geometric series formula for getting rid of the summation
if n = 1 then we can compute the sum manually
ignore the summation for now
just simplify w^11j
how would we write w^11j in a nicer way
(w^11)^j
nice!
now lets look at the summation now
ignore the n+4 for now
for now lets just put a k there
sum from j=0 to k
lets pretend k is 0 to start
evaluate the sum
this should be very easy
no idea
Cozmogrgdfschkipkhrshtensi
4
trick question?
i am telling you it's better if we use geometric series no?
if it's a k instead of a n it's zero still
you mean 1
because anything to the 0 power is 1
you forgot that roots of unity go around the circle, they never go to the origin
ah
but sure, you can try a geometric series
lemme know what you get with an arbitrary k as the sum upper limit
i don't get it
then lets not worry about the geometric series and just take it step by step
now we evaluated the sum up to 0
which was trivial
evaluate the sum up to k=1
you dont really have to evaluate the whole sum
you just need to roughly visualize this
w^11
1 + w^11
that
and w^11 we said was e^2pi.i/3
so can you see that this is definitely not 0
lets once again use z = w^11 = e^2pi.i/3 for convenience
okay
now lets evaluate the sum for k=2
so we take our 1 + z
and we add one more term
this time, i do want you to evaluate the entire sum
can you figure out what it is?
w^6
why
i dont think so? why is this true
also it would be much easier to think in terms of z instead of w
we said w^11 as z
no need to keep using w
lets once again use z = w^11 = e^2pi.i/3 for convenience
w^6 = e^{4.i.pi/11}
ook my bad
w^22 = e^4pi.i/3
N=7?
@little totem
yes
ok so hold up
before making points about N
what is the sum 1 + z + z^2
we didnt evaluate this yet
1 + w11 + w22
how
its much easier to work with
e^2pi.i/3
than
e^2pi.i/33
why go to the one with bigger denominators
it's a geometric series
right, so evaluate it
lets once again use z = w^11 = e^2pi.i/3 for convenience
w^33 = 1 because w is in g33
the sum is zero
z^3=1
yeah, see that?
there is no need to go back to w to evaluate that
there is nothing special about w that you have to base everything off of it
ok so
another way to understand why this sums to 0
z is an element of G_n
whats the minimum n here?
n is in N
what is the fewest points around a circle you need to coincide with z?
2
z0 and z1
this is G3
remember this?
visualize 3 points around the circle in a triangle
z is the top point
so minimum Gn is G3
yeah
so we are adding
1 + z + z^2
can you see that that is simply the 3 evenly spaced points around the circle?
did you follow the steps so far? i promise ill get to your problem
but im trying to lay out the intuition for you
so that you are able to understand what is happening better
youll be able to better understand the other problems
ok so
since they are the 3 evenly spaced points around the circle
the sum is 0
because they all cancel with each other
you can think of it as saying the center of mass is at 0
we summed from j=0 to 2
if we sum from 0 to 3, what happens?
1+z + z^2 + z^3= 0
thats sum up to 2, not 3
ok so your left side is correct now
but this sum is not 0
what is z^3?
1
try again
yep
roots of "unity" meaning 1
these are evenly spaced around the unit circle
they can never be 0
z is in g3