#help-27
1 messages · Page 366 of 1
So if it doesnt then it cant have an extrema , cause it will just be increasing or decreasing, right?
Actually I just realized
None of what I said is relevant
You want to check for global extremas
My bad
Also hi cloud, all yours cuz I've clearly fucked up lol
No but I think I get it right?
Can someone just confirm
The diagram seems to match what I had in mind
so knowing the derivative is greater than or equal to 0 (with zeros only at isolated points), we can sketch what the points where the derivative is equal to 0 look like. they have to look like places where it briefly goes flat but is pointing upward on both sides. so it's actually increasing the entire time
can someone help with this
The point here is just that the function is strictly increasing except on some points where the derivative is 0
please get your own help channel #❓how-to-get-help
i did nobody respond
Dude be patient
But never decreasing, therefore there's no extrema, right?
Or even, but not decreasing
A constant function is never decreasing but has an extremum (the constant value)
well if it was zero for some interval then it would be even. but if the derivative is only zero at single points then it's actually increasing the entire time
Locally, sure
Not necessarily globally
Closed by @viral lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Tbh for this question I would just think of the limit
sin(2x) is only between -1 and 1 so it's irrelevant, and the limit of 2x at either infinity is either infinity, so...
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the comparision between the problems 3, 4 and the problems 6,7? (This is asked at the last of the question 7.)
Look at what you need to prove, and there is a similarity between 3 & 6, 4 & 7
Is the similarity that both the pair of problems require the user to proof relations of the form A + B = C and A - B = C, where the As, Bs and Cs are symbolically equal in each pair of problems?
Is it coincidence?
@north hound Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
e?
I mean r
ok right
let's keep going with the "20 athletes, 3 medals" example
unfortunately though it will be extremely tough if you claim not to know nor have reference for the multiplication rule
but anyway, here is the pic i showed again
for 2 medals (gold and silver)
there are 20*19 possible winner lineups
What is the multiplication rule it might be later in the slides or next few lectures
phrased in combinatorial terms it'll be something like this:
if one choice can be made in m ways, and another choice can be made in n ways independently of the first,
then the number of ways to make both choices at once is m*n
for a simpler example, if you need to dress for work and can pick from 6 shirts and 4 pairs of pants, and have to wear one of each,
then that's 6*4 = 24 possible outfits you can make
or e.g. if you are looking at lunch options in the canteen and there are:
- 4 different first courses
- 3 different second courses
- 5 different desserts
(and you have to pick one first course, one second course and one dessert)
then the number of ways that you could assemble your tray is 4 * 3 * 5
I’m not sure what’s combinatorial terms
you're overthinking it
"phrased in a combinatorial way" perhaps
if you want a wording that's less prone to get stuck on
ok
so you understand now why the number of lineups with a gold and silver medal is going to be 20 × 19, yes?
@keen sundial Has your question been resolved?
yes
ok
let's try to add bronze to the lineup now
if we have already fixed a gold and silver medalist, how many options do we have for bronze?
wdym fixed a gold and silver medalist?
if you have already chosen a gold/silver guy
did you suddenly stop understanding the words "gold medalist" and "silver medalist"
or maybe "fix"
i have no idea what part of "fix a gold and silver medalist" is unclear
17
yea first was gold so thats 19, second was silver which is 18, third is bronze which has to be 17
no
gold has 20 options
silver has 19 options
bronze in fact has 18 candidates not 17
then bronze has 18
yes exactly
so then
using the same logic by which there are 20 × 19 lineups if we just give out gold and silver,
if we give out gold, silver and bronze, how many lineups will there be?
@keen sundial you get 5 minutes
20 * 19 * 18
ok
great.
do you see how this logic could continue if we wanted to have more places in the lineup than just 3?
e.g. if we wanted to give out prizes down to and including 5th place, how many possible winner lineups would we have?
@keen sundial
you're overfocusing on a piece of the picture that doesnt really form a logical part of it
the picture is most naturally broken down into rows
the first row contains all the 2-place lineups where #01 gets the gold medal. there are 19 of these.
the second row contains all the 2-place lineups where #02 gets the gold medal. there are also 19 of these.
the third row..
do i need to continue?
@keen sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @keen sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what can I further do to solve this limit
the power is 1/x ?
.close
Closed by @deft flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
p(a' ∩ b) how would you draw this as a venn diagram?
you could do this step by step. first start out with two venn diagrams. side by side. in one, shade a' and in the other shade b
now look at the area that would be common to both shaded areas
with that draw a 3rd one
i understand the concept that it means P(B) - (A ∩ B) but i just cant visualize it on a venn diagram
So only the area in B that doesnt intersect with A?
Yea
.close
Closed by @forest palm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
?
!
?
be more specific in what you're ?ing at
Im confused on how to approach the quest
that limit of a sum looks awfully like some kinda integral
ok so maybe shift everything down one unit so that B is now the origin and the equation of the curve is 4(y-1) = x^2
express this in polar coordinates
then integrate the resulting r(θ) function from -pi/2 to 0
x = r cos(θ), y = r sin(θ) -> put that into 4(y-1) = x^2
ig it's gonna look ugly as hell but still

... i do not know what that emoji is supposed to mean
yeah honestly i dont fucking know
its gonna take some serious trig crunch no matter what i think

unless theres some stupid trick specifically for this question
How am i supposed to think of this during the exam
Idek
I wrote like 400 pages of notes
On parabola
Circles
I wonder if B being the focus does anything
@vapid socket Has your question been resolved?
is there a solution given 💀
@vapid socket I got 2/(1-sinx) intgeral from 0 to pi/2
Its undefined tho
The issue is that at when r=n you are making an angle of pi/2 but that point is at infinity
@vapid socket Has your question been resolved?
just leave it no point on wasting so much time on 1 question
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! Theres this proof ive done. But i think it isnt a proper proof and I’ve listed the flaws as well. Could someone help me verify it? Thank you!
the whole point of the notation of S and T like that is to say that they have n or m elements
So i could use this proof even if its short?
Also my book uses a proof using contrapositive and contradiction for that one. I was wondering if thats a proof technique for proving double implications
how did your book define what that notation even means?
cause it should mean something like:
- there is a bijection f:{1,...,n}->S
- we denote f(1) by s_1, f(2) by s_2 and so on
and from there |S|=n should be obvious
The first line is whats mentioned in the book, its part of a preposition
@rocky gate Has your question been resolved?
@rocky gate Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rocky gate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yeah
any
ay+bx+c=0 equations are straight lines
So is a, b, c here all zero?
They are parameters
in the y=x case, a=1, b=-1
x = y can be rearranged to
x - y = 0
so it would be a = 1, b = -1
c=0
or a=-1 and b=1
there are other options as well, but this one is prolly the most natural one
or a = -pi, b = pi
,calc 2/2
Result:
1
,calc 0/2
Result:
0
Your math is all over the place. Show the actual problem you're working on
This Delta came out of nowhere
I said I use “delta right?”
I’m just trying to figure out what x = y equals to…
It has actually zero numbers…
1
How
Just answer this
How did you conclude Delta = 1
Because
What does Delta even represent
A is 1 b is 1 c is 0
It’s used to calculate zero numbers
Read this again
No idea where you get Delta from
You're confusing different things together
It’s x = 0 and y =1
If x=0 and y=1, does x=y?
.
.
x is the independent variable so it can take on any numbers
Why can’t the line be for example here?
y follows what x equals by the relationship y = x
Because that's not x = y
,w plot y=-x
Pick numbers for x, then take the negative of them and plot them
For lines you only need to do that for two points
(5,5) is a point on x=y yes
,but can you explain ?
I did here
??? It’s not the same line
y = 5 is a line
You're just using Wolfram wrong
This is how Wolfram interprets y=5
So y=5 can be this?
No
Then what do you mean
You're leaving out this information
You're thinking wolfram knows what you're trying to do
When all you give it is y=5
But you just said that y=5 isn’t this
Dude you also said that this isn’t x=y
Why can’t x=y be for example this? @supple knot
Right. I already said your black line was y=-x
.
The red line doesn't go through (1,1)
It goes through 0,0
And you said that x = y is 0,0 0,0
<@&1280681159495385169>
Wrong
Read this again
(0,0) is one point, (1,1) is another point on x=y
@molten wagon Has your question been resolved?
How do you know it is 1,1
When x = 1, y=x implies y=1
But dude
OK.
But for example
x = y + 3
@supple knot
How would you do that
,w x = y +3
you should just learn this. connect two points and they make a unique line
you can stop pinging me
Closed by @molten wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
test
Hello, I would like someone to check if I did well on my work.
those are just questions. where's your work
With this
Here it is:
You here?
Did you even read your instructions
Why do your solutions look so hand wavey when that is precisely what they want to avoid
Well, I don't really know what to do.
Perhaps you should look at some lecture materials from your class
Okay. I'll redo it, then.
But wait, aren't lecture materials like not helpful in certain cases?
Literally look at your own answers
None of them actually answer what they want you to do
I doubt this assignment was given with no help at all, it’s a pretty big and in depth assignment that you seem to have no idea how to do
I’m sure they must’ve covered some of this in class
Yeah.
As to reconstruction of classic theorem proofs there are many online you can find
I'll try reviewing them.
I doubt you’re allowed to just quote Markov’s inequality without proof either
Ok, Ok.
.close
Closed by @fringe garnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Renato
@spring oasis Has your question been resolved?
Is there anything you tried?
f(x,y) - P3(x,y) = R(x,y)
@spring oasis Has your question been resolved?
i think the big idea is to find out the second order taylor pol
out of the third order taylor pol
Forget this
i did
so we dont know f but its taylor polynomial, looks like it's ought to be related to the theorem from before
How do I find which part of the third order Taylor poly is the second order poly
my thoughts would be to either substitute x=u+1 and y=v-2 and then grouping P_3 should be easier, I guess
They give the Taylor poly because that's the point
Grouping p3?
ya
because before you would have to factor terms like (x-1) and (y+2) instead
which i mean is harder
Just
Help me find p2 please
Trust me the calculations get simple if we figure out p2
it's given lol
Well
that's some insane algebra, personally i would substitute then you group x and y not (x-1) and (y+2)
F and P are equal at the point
(1,-2)
The idea is simple @faint gorge
f and P3 are equal at the point (1,-2)
sure
What I mean is, f(1,-2) = P3(1,-2)
i understood that
If we differentiate P3 wrt x and evaluate (1,-2) we get fx(1,-2)
No worries
almost thought it was my help channel and u were my helper
I have been scratching my head a lot with this one
dont overscratch tho
didnt you solve this before tho? 
illusions
was there something unclear at that time
lmao
The method
like it seemed to come out of nowhere or something like that?
There is a simpler way
hmmm thats interesting
yea i didnt necessarily give the simplest one, just the one that came to mind
tho whats this simpler way
Use this
Find second order Taylor poly
Then use Taylor theorem
It's hard to explain
@faint gorge
you have the 3rd order taylor polynomial but not the original function so how would you find the 2nd order taylor poly
also how wdym by use taylor's theorem
There is a corollary
@faint gorge
@spring oasis i think @zenith spoke is willing to help as well
You have the third Taylor poli, using that and this you can figure out the second Taylor polynomial
This
If we differentiate P3 wrt x and evaluate (1,-2) we get fx(1,-2)
what does this tell you
We have that (f(x,y) - P2)/norm{(x,y)-(1,-2)}^2 = 0
so you are doing all that in order to substitute P_2 in place of f(x,y) in the limit?
Trust
I can explain
But you have to trust my ass
or maybe to find out that this limit is the same as the limit of the quotient you are talking about +4?
oops mb sorry universe i thought that i was replying to renato
i didnt mean to ping (ik its late for you thats why i am saying this)
Focus
I mean the way I told you about before is most probably easier than this ngl
the thing is that what you are doing here isnt exactly meaningful
you are trying to find P_2 and substitute it for f(x,y) in the given limit expression
Last time we solved this we ignored P3
but you can already substitute P_3
what
No
how did we do that
Sorry
we literally substituted P_3
Yes I remember now
and worked things out from there
No
I mean thats the purpose of the question if you ask me tbh
(at least thats what i am seeing lol)
I am saying something else
hmmm then whats the conclusion you want to reach
f(x,y) = P2(x,y) + R2(x,y)
f(x,y) - P2(x,y) = R2(x,y)
right all good till now
I am trusting you but what is the next step is all i am asking
Ok
First we find p2
After we find p2, we use it this way f(x,y) = P2(x,y) + R2(x,y)
f(x,y) - P2(x,y) = R2(x,y) using Taylor lemma
I think it's better if we go ahead and do it, you will see
We will arrive same place in less steps
ok so this is the taylor series in multivariables
at the end is the 2nd order polynomial for a function of 2 variables
ie P_2
Works aswell for multivariate
you need partial derivatives etc..
Yes
which is this
a better version since 2 variables so slightly less horrible notation
You gotta trust me
we have $P_3$ which is the horrible\ $P_3(1,-2)=P_2+\frac 1{3!}(f_{xxx}(1,-2)+3f_{xxy}(1,-2)+3f_{xyy}(1,-2)+f_{yyy}(1,-2))$
ali yassine
yes, but we dont care about that, we want to find P2
but we have P_3
and we want to get P_2 from there
to find P_2 we need to know the partial derivatives of f
again, this is for functions of one variable
ok so how do you apply this to multivariable functions
so, there is this formula for P2
,, P_2 = f(x_0, y_0) + f_x(x_0,y_0)(x-x_0) + f_y(x_0,y_0)(y-y_0) \ + \frac{1}{2!} {f_{xx}(x_0, y_0)(x-x_0)^2 + 2f_{xy}(x_0,y_0)(x-x_0)(y-y_0) + f_{yy}(x_0, y_0)(y-y_0)^2 }
Renato
this is the formula for P2
and we know that f(x0, y0) = P3(x0,y0)
we know that fx(x0, y0) = P3x(x0,y0)
we know that fy(x0,y0) = P3y(x0,y0)
we know that fxx(x0,y0) = P3xx(x0,y0)
we know that fxy(x0,y0) = P3xy(x0,y0)
we know that fyy(x0,y0) = P3yy(x0,y0)
here you probably meant P_yy right?
yes
f(1,-2) = 3
fx(1,-2) = 2
fy(1,-2) = 0
fxx(1,-2) = 0
fxy(1,-2) = -1
fyy(1,-2) = 8
you still here?
@zenith spoke
yes i am
,, P_2 = 3 + 2(x-1) + 0 + \frac{1}{2!}{0 -2(x-1)(y+2) + 8(y+2)^2} \ P_2 = 3 + 2(x-1) + \frac{1}{2} {-2(x-1)(y+2) + 8(y+2)^2} \ P_2 = 3 + 2(x-1) -(x-1)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2 \ P_2 = 3 + 2(x-1) + (1-x)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2 \ f(x,y) = P_2(x,y) + R_2(x,y) \ R_2(x,y) = f(x,y) - P_2(x,y)
alright
now we use taylors lemma
note that i didnt check any calculations but i am trusting you on that
trust
unless I made a typo everything should be correct
because most of the stuff was calculated by wolfram
this is the only part I did by myself
we use taylors theorem
,, P_2 = 3 + 2(x-1) + 0 + \frac{1}{2!}{0 -2(x-1)(y+2) + 8(y+2)^2} \ P_2 = 3 + 2(x-1) + \frac{1}{2} {-2(x-1)(y+2) + 8(y+2)^2} \ P_2 = 3 + 2(x-1) -(x-1)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2 \ P_2 = 3 + 2(x-1) + (1-x)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2 \ f(x,y) = P_2(x,y) + R_2(x,y) \ R_2(x,y) = f(x,y) - P_2(x,y) \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{f(x,y) - P_2(x,y)}{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} = 0
Renato
,, \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{f(x,y) - P_2(x,y) + P_2(x,y) + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{f(x,y) - P_2(x,y) }{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} + \frac{P_2(x,y) + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{P_2(x,y) + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} \ P_2 = 3 + 2(x-1) + (1-x)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2 \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{3 + 2(x-1) + (1-x)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2 + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{-xy + 4y^2 + 9y + 19+ xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{(x-1)^2 + (y+2)^2}
3 + 2(x-1) + (1-x)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2
3 + (2x - 2) + (y+2-xy-2x) + 4(y^2 + 2y + 4)
3 + (2x - 2) + (y+2-xy-2x) + (4y^2 + 8y + 16)
3 + (y-xy) + (4y^2 + 8y + 16)
3 -xy + 4y^2 + 9y + 16
-xy + 4y^2 + 9y + 19
keep it as 4(y+2)^2
then take 4 as a common factor and simplify
can I get some help
we are getting there
,, \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{f(x,y) - P_2(x,y) + P_2(x,y) + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{f(x,y) - P_2(x,y) }{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} + \frac{P_2(x,y) + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{P_2(x,y) + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} \ P_2 = 3 + 2(x-1) + (1-x)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2 \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{3 + 2(x-1) -(x-1)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2 + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{(x-1)^2 + (y+2)^2}
yea sure
Renato
from here simplify just like you did before editting
but at the end do not expand the term 4(y+2)^2 this time
3 + 2(x-1) + (1-x)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2
3 + (2x - 2) + (y+2-xy-2x) + 4(y+2)^2
3 + [(2x - 2) + (-2x + 2)] + (y-xy) + 4(y+2)^2
3 + (y-xy) + 4(y+2)^2
3 + y -xy + 4(y+2)^2
,, \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{f(x,y) - P_2(x,y) + P_2(x,y) + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{f(x,y) - P_2(x,y) }{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} + \frac{P_2(x,y) + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{P_2(x,y) + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{\norm{(x,y) - (1,-2)}^2} \ P_2 = 3 + 2(x-1) + (1-x)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2 \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{3 + 2(x-1) -(x-1)(y+2) + 4(y+2)^2 + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{(x-1)^2 + (y+2)^2} \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{3 + y -xy + 4(y+2)^2 + xy -y -3 + 4(x-1)^2}{(x-1)^2 + (y+2)^2} \ \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{4(y+2)^2 + 4(x-1)^2}{(x-1)^2 + (y+2)^2} = 4 \cdot \lim_{(x,y) \to (1,-2)} \frac{(x-1)^2 + (y+2)^2}{(x-1)^2 + (y+2)^2} = 4 \cdot 1
Renato
broo
Literally idk if it was more or less work
At the end it was pretty similar
I do prefer doing partial derivatives rather than complete the square tho
yea well you shouldve expected that the work would be similar from some point onwards
you will always have to pass by the algebraic sinplification/manipulation step with this kind of questions
yea go for the way that you see fit
Well I do remember we needed difference of cubes at one point or another
@zenith spoke
Exercise was hard tbh
Like, if you recall in the other solution dude
We inserted the P3 directly in the limit
yes we did
well you bombed it 🔥
Like, the first time we did this, we inserted P3 but that's why at some point or another we had to use difference of cubes
Using P2 was a little shorter but required to compute the partial derivatives of P3
Well I just wanted to show you this method
this was a nice way to tackle the problem ngl
Using Taylor's theorem and using the fact that f(x0) = P(x0) and f'(x0) = P''(x0)
And so on and so forth
Anyways, have a good one
I learnt a bunch today
have a great day/night too
i enjoyed our conversation!
when you are done please type .close
.close
Closed by @spring oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
those 5 points are cyclic
@rain summit Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @rain summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't understand this reasoning. My textbook doesn't mention F having to be simply connected anywhere
My textbook just says f needs to be continuous on a domain
@urban aurora Has your question been resolved?
@urban aurora Has your question been resolved?
Not simply connected implies discontinuous
@urban aurora Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rccw
How did you get the antiderivative on like 4
I applied integral by parts for xlnsinxdx taking x as u and lnsinx as v
Should show the full step
That's how you know you made a mistake
And why you shouldn't skip steps
I see now
@sturdy fiber Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sturdy fiber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m stuck, this question is guiding me through l’hospitals rule step by step. And I have just finished deriving, this is the second step, but I am now lost at the third step.
I’m confused because I don’t understand what they are asking of me
Differentiate, not derive. But they’re really just asking you to rewrite $\frac{2\sqrt{5x}}{5x}$ in an equivalent form with only $2$ in the numerator.
Civil Service Pigeon
aka ||divide both the numerator and denominator by sqrt(5x)||
@grave delta Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
beginner with inductions could anyone help
For induction you want to show that the statement is true for n=0 (in this case)
Then show that if the statement P(n) is true for any n, then it's P(n+1) is true for n+1
yes I'm familiar with the step, not so much on how to act on it
Are you familiar with proofs?
I've done it before
Prove $P(0)$ and $(P(n) \implies P(n+1))$
flynger
Have you written induction proofs before?
oh sorry not familiar with those kind of proofs, I've just done a unit in highschool that had formulas and different than this
no
I do know base case is usually 0, 1 sometimes and we prove for that, then we try to prove for every number after which is n + 1
and so on
In order to prove $p \implies q$ you are basically showing that if you assume $p$ to be true then $q$ must be true
So you usually write. "Suppose $p$." and then use logic to arrive at $q$.
flynger
Ok but have you read induction proofs before and are familiar with how they are structured ?
ohh that's what you were asking about to prove p0 and pn
I'm familiar with the steps I need to take, I have tried doing proofs I kind of struggle on how to turn it into my hypnosis
I'm trying to learn the structure so I could get a better hang of inductions
Ok so in this case what would your induction hypothesis look like ?
Example of a proof
Prove that $x=1 \implies x^2-1=0$.
$\textit{Proof. }$Suppose $x=1$. Then $x^2=1$, so subtracting 1 on both sides gives $x^2-1=0$.
Hence, if $x=1$, then $x^2-1=0$.
flynger
Does that make sense?
sorry using paint
yes
Wait I’ve done this proof before
You Are just rewriting the problem statement
For the inductive case in induction you have to show
$P(n) \implies P(n+1)$ for any $n \in \mathbb{N}$.
flynger
if it was already n + 1 before would it be n + 2 now? like ths
yes I got what we have to be proving
Now what is your Next step ?
inductive step, prove for k + 1
Ok and what would that look like on paper ?
like how I would do that?
I'm not really sure, I get stuck here, the hypnosis is pretty straightforward
Yes this is a little more tricky you need to break up the sum on the left. I will do something quickly
okay thank you!
Ultimately this is what you want to arrive at when I say „break up the sum“
Are you familiar with this ?
The hypothesis that you stated above is ultimately where you want to arrive at
Now would you know how to move forward from here ?
@languid jungle Has your question been resolved?
how did you make this?
yesyes
Ok so using that Knowledge what is the next step. Look at other induction proofs and try to solve this one
this is the first one from the textbooks I'm not famliar with others to look at yet
You need to apply your induction hypothesis to the formula now to end up here
Do you understand why ?
ohh I see, the right side shown here is when you break the sum like you said but since we can't put all the sums we just do 2^k+1
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Sort of yes. We apply $2^{k+1}$ because we are breaking off the $k+1th$ part of the sum. Does that make sense ?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
???
Yes
Baker
ah I see that makes other equation similar
I see the structer of such now
.close
Closed by @languid jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Modular of z=(1-z)=1/z
Solve for z in C
Idk how to start
,,z \in \mathbb{C}, |z| = |1-z|=|\frac{1}{z}|
Is it true that $\bigg| \frac{1}{z}\bigg|=\frac{1}{|z|}$?
flynger
Yep
Try seeing what you can get out of $|z|=\frac{1}{|z|}$ which only has one unknown
flynger
@lilac crescent Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, for this, I don't understand how the co-ordinate of P is -0.5,2.5 because everytime I do it, I keep getting -0.5,1.5
because I diffrentiated it, to get 6x^2 + 6x
and then cuz it equal -1.5
i got the equation
6x^2 + 6x + 1.5 = 0
and then I solved the quadratic to get
-0.5
and then subbed it back into the first equation
and I keep getting
1.5
well i plugged -0.5 into it and got 2.5
ok, maybe I just need to redo it again..
hm
maybe I'm just a bit stupid lmao I just redid it again 😭
I need to take a break (I have my gcse math mock tomm and I'm stressing, clearly)
.close
Closed by @zealous nest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I just got to angle-bisector and triangle proportion theorem, how do i find both x and y?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@dull thicket Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dull thicket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what percentage do I need on my finals which are worth 30% of my mark to pass the course? (50%+)
I'm dead serious btw
If your finals are worth 30%
And you need 50% to pass
I'm sorry, but you're screwed mate
...
Even if you get full on the final, you'll only be at 48.6
I have another assignment worth ~15%?
Try and get full on that
Try to get full marks on the assignments
you’re cooked
my teacher marks so hard tho
Then you would need ~60% on the final
what class is it
english
That's bad
oh who cares then
you're going to need pretty much full marks for everything left
you need the credit to graduate?
🤔
sure
i got 95%+ in all my other math/science shit
don’t classes run year round
nah its 1 semester for english
🤔🤔🤔
only time i had alternating courses waa for bullshit electives
yea this is pretty bad
depends on the school, at my school its per semester.... only some IB courses are full sem
do you procrastinate
in my senior year after getting into uni i don’t think i did more than two assignments for my english class in the fourth quarter and i still had like a 50
how do you get an 18
tbh its probably their time management
nah not for anything except english
is it like too boring
i don’t blame you tbh
Try asking in #study-discussion
that might be the issue
do you do nothing in class?
idk I don't hand in anything on time
for english
FOR ENGLISH
not in other classes, pretty sure its only english
yeah its just english
aaa
is it just too boring for you
idk my teacher is weird too
or like do you just dont have the motivation for assignments
what grade is this
grade 11
holy
no like
that’s the year to lock in
its only november
i suggest at least getting a BOOK
maybe I can come back from this
I've never read a book outside of english class
that you are interested in
except for textbooks
you probably read some things as a kid
no like if you are super zoned out of english, just pull out the book and start reading it, at least that'll kinda help
I'm to lazy to do that bruh 😭 😭
also teacher will probably not get mad at you if you are literally reading in an english class lol
*too
to*
no
- has the teacher ever stopped you
- have you considered getting an engaging book
mmm should probably stop doing that
once I think
what do you want to do after school
uni
damn
is it geniunely over for me
holy shit, is the teacher just unresponsible 😮💨 .....
maybe not over over
i mean...
like you can get into unis still
yeah
i got
if your sciences/maths are above 90s...? maybe they'll consider english as an outlier
ap physics 1, 2, calc bc, biology this year
i knew kids with garbage gpas that went to uni but like definitely not prestigious ones
that’s good i guess
math is a snooze fest too
in what sense
like it’s easy and you get 100s or like you don’t do shit
and get 20s
I don't do shit and get 100s
wait...
are you in regular english
yeh
damn isn’t there like nothing to do in regular english
kinda
I think its still comebackable to 75 or smt
uhhh
i may have slightly exagerrated
stop playing video games or some shit
I literally don't do shit except math and physics at home
hmm
and I just do math in english class
doubt it
do you do math or physics in school
math/sleep
im fr bruh
exaggerated*
i mean...
I still got
1 essay
1 reading comprehension test
2 assignments
and final exam
i mean i was a similar way in high school like i’d pull out math books in english class but my teacher was ok with it because i handed my shit in and had a good grade
what was ur grade in english
maybe comebackable
depends on the year but it was always around 97
some universities are kinda lenient on a low mark if the rest of the marks are high...? depends on things tbh
does writing just come to you naturally
or maybe it's because I don't read books
idk
probably the books thing
I write like a fucking AI
maybe don’t use gpt
uhh...
uhh
i mean you don’t even need to read that many books like if you just read anything even online you’ll develop the skill
I think I get 80s on my essays if I try
?
what about just audiobooks
like exactly 80%
like
I kinda understand how to improve my writing
first of all I make 5-6 careless mistakes in each essay
and then the other thing is
I think I should go deeper in my analysis ig
and rephrase them so they flow better
maybe
and for reading its usually 90%+ that shits kinda free
my 10th grade english teacher was begging me to major in english
tried looking for occupations that combined english skills with stem
i was like no sorry
my math teacher was begging me to major in the maths since i was doing some bs in grade 10
like above calc and beyond lmfao
like 2 weeks
no like fr
you could do it in 2 weeks
i did physics c e&m + physics 2 in like 3 weeks
spring break was a nightmare
wtf?
I gotta self study physics 2 aswell
physics 2 was the easy part tbh
how about physics 1
uhh idk i did that in school in 11th
phsyics 1 is kinda free ngl
without any physics experience it might be a bit more difficult



