#help-27
1 messages · Page 349 of 1
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
If applicable
sorry it's kinda hard to take a picture and put it on discord
uh its ok
maybe put roblox away
Just tell us the question
the question says find area of sector CAD which is an arc
mhm
and A is the center of the circle
Okay
Okay
So do you know how to express the area of an arc as a ratio of the area of a circle
yes
Its 64/360 right
correct
yes pie x radius squared
ye
pie
Okay can you calculate that for me
(its π btw pronounced pi)
Note that once we have area of circle, we can multiply it by 64/360 to find the arc area
oh thankyou
the area is 452.4
and the sector is 77
thanks for the help
.close
Closed by @barren quiver
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
d
Could someone please explain the continuity proof and how to construct similar proofs for other functions? This is on the exam
But I wasn't taught it
Oop someone beat me to it
,rccw
,rcw
Is that tryna say the trapezoidal rule
alr
If so that's unfortunate, I hate that method
fair
What help do U need with?
i got 180
For that stuff if you don't get it right, ask some AI like Gemini, they tend to be okay at this kinda stuff
Like checking it over and spotting errors
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
or idl
<@&268886789983436800> this user has been acting kind of spammy and disruptive in multiple channels
Wth did I do
For maths and coding
Do you not agree AI like Gemini could be useful for numerical methods
i used
I don't trust it for getting concepts and etc
seeing as they themselves have done AI-generated answers in these channels yeah
was this an "i want my work checked" situation @ancient pollen
this message contains this server's policy on AI, I don't think anyone denies that it can be an useful tool, now please stay on topic
kind of
alr 😭
pi
i used pi’s value and got it , i firstly used 180 cuz i though it was radian but nvm😭🙏
i cannot see any mistakes except for a nitpick about your handwriting
pi is pi, and pi should not be replaced with 180 on a whim
okay
Closed by @ancient pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
which one
Progress:
f.
It is writeen 1.0532 in the book😭🙏
idk if book is incorrect
this is correct
Closed by @ancient pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
On the grid, the sum of the elements of each lane and column are the same, whats the value of A + B - C?
$\bmqty{3 & a & 8 \ 7 & b & c \ d & e & 6}$
Ann
this is the grid, yes?
yea
how did a=5 happen
3+5=8
but that isn't what the problem says...
it says that the following sums:
- 3+a+8 (first row)
- 7+b+c (second row)
- d+e+6 (third row)
- 3+7+d (first column)
- a+b+e (second column)
- 8+c+6 (third column)
are equal to each other
it does not say that the equality "first number + second number = third number" is true in any of these lines!
yes
its all a big trial and error imo
i would not say so
i got 3+3+8 and 8+1+6 which both come out to 15
now to see another lane and column to see what they make
you can do some algebra here
and express all other letters in terms of a
its 3+4+8 comes to 15
you don't need trial and error here
girl beside me got
3 4 8
7 7 1
5 4 6
that's a possibility but it isn't the only one
im a bit on the slower side of the human brain if you hadnt caught that by now
i am not going to judge
but i will ask
what level of education are you on right now
middle school? high school? uni?
if you're in school you can tell me what grade you are in instead
really theres only one thing that's absolutely necessary to know
are you over or under 13 years old?
ok
so
are you familiar with algebra
like solving equations for x
that sort of thing
if you are over 13 you should have already learned a thing or two about those, maybe in an earlier year or maybe this year idk
anyway
16
ok that's even better
you definitely need to be familiar with algebra by now
gonna bring the number grid back
$\bmqty{3 & a & 8 \ 7 & b & c \ d & e & 6}$
Ann
so
the sum of the first row is 3+a+8, or a+11.
the problem says that both other rows, and all columns, also give total a+11.
do you understand so far? yes or no.
(do not try to proceed on your own unless you are 110% confident that you are doing the right thing.)
ohhh yea
the right word in english for a horizontal line like this is "row"
so, do you understand what i said so far
all of the columns and rows come out to a total being a+11?
'default' is the wrong word
but is it right?
not really, but if you replace it with a correct word like "sum" or "total" then it becomes right
all i did was repeat the statement of the problem
that all rows and all columns sum to the same total
and i just said that this total equals a+11
no rocket science here
but i want to make sure that i didn't lose you
@ancient pecan i will only continue when you say you're OK to continue
ok. let's now look at the third column, because it has a letter that we care about (c) and two known numbers.
8+c+6 = a+11
in this equation, can you isolate c?
c+14?
not what i asked
i generally dont know what people ask me about numbers in english
the left side simplifies to c+14, yes.
but i want you to rewrite the whole equation so that it reads c = ...
hold on
what's your native language?
portuguese?
por yea
Resolva a equação c+14 = a+11 para c
its gonna take a while
it is one step
grab some popcorn
how long is "a while"
im genuinely ashamed of how long this is taking me
im gonna go off on a limb and say
c = 11+ a -14
death to me😭
im cringing hard rn
maybe its killing my brain the fact im doing 2 assignments at the same time
why are you doing 2 assignments at the same time?
11 + 14 = a+c
in school rn
can this wait until you are back from school
maybe
on this server you're expected to devote your undivided attention when someone is helping you
ok then wait until school is over then come back here lmao
okk
i'm going to close this now.
when you get home from school again, take a new channel and post your problem there.
.close
Closed by @pseudo basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a,b,c are positive real numbers, prove:
Or a³/b² + b³/c² + c³/a² ≥ a²/b + b²/c + c²/a when written out
This is probably some clever AM-GM
if you wanna get cheeky use muirhead
im p sure muirhead is just repeated am-gm lemme try to find it
actually nvm muirhead doesent work
did you try Cauchy–Bunyakovsky–Schwarz inequality?
With which sets of numbers?
with ${\sqrt{\frac{a^3}{b^2}}, ...} and {\sqrt{a} , ...}$ for example
dont you need a+b+c for that
ViNton
you can make another CBS
i mean after sets that i sent you can make another CBS to finish proof
So i do this and hen i have to prove a+b+c ≤ a²/b+b²/c+c²/a?
correct
Well a²/b + b ≥ 2a... So that leads me there
Thanks I guess, i found the problem in an introduction to Holder's inequality but i guess CBS is easier than that
Thank you @patent nexus
.close
Closed by @rough nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i mean cauchy is holder just when p=q=1
The introduction was mainly about p=q=3 so there's probably a very clever and neat solution
I'm satisfied with the CBS one though
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
higher outer circle equation:
(x-0.5)^2 + (y- sqrt(3)/2)^2 = 0.8
lower outer circle equation:
(x-1)^2 + y^2 = 0.8
integration limits:
upper circle (0 - 1.4)
lower circle (1.4 - 1.9)
So you're trying to make chatgpt logo with math functions?
I made the logo but the integrating is killing me
polar coordinate?
I just need help
?
You want to fill some part of the logo?
yes
how do I find them (out of my knowledge)
Then I guess you have to manualy take the area you want to color.
oh cool
What about taking the integral of the upper function minus the lower function (for area under x-axis, do the same)?
then find the equation in the form of y = something
save only the positive part
then integrate
hmm
nvm
would that find the area under it tho
and then how do I use them
so essentially u let x = costheta y = sintheta
can u call? if thats alr
sorry, no can do
alright
i simply integrate in the polar world
This Calculus 2 video tutorial explains how to find the area of a polar curve in polar coordinates. It provides resources on how to graph a polar equation and how to find the area of the shaded region. It contains plenty of examples and practice problems on how to find the area of one loop or of one petal and how to find the area of the inner ...
should look into this
not sure abt this, u should recheck with other sources
alr thanks still
@flint vine Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @flint vine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am trying to solve this integral using integration by parts and the answer I am arriving at is not matching the answer in my book
The book provided answer is $$(t^5 ln(t))/5 - (t^5)/25 + C$$
columbian twizzler importer
I’m really confused because the amp is -5 but why are they adding and subtracting 5 for the max and min instead of -5
So now I am confused when I can use negative and when I don’t
You've also not multiplied by 4
@velvet jacinth Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @velvet jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello i know this is probably silly, but the video im watching the teacher said the yellow degree is 90 + teta/2
but doesnt that rule apply when it was bisector ? (i used translate im sorry)
Total degree of a triangle is 180. The equation of the big triangle is $$\theta + 2 \alpha+2 \beta = 180$$ for the smaller triangle, it's $$\phi + \alpha + \beta = 180$$ Substitube $\alpha+\beta$ from the first equation into the second, you'll get the result.
Good
Closed by @quick seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would I simplify this?
You might want to rewrite the surds as fractional exponents first.
not sure what surds means but you mean like x^1/2 and x^11/4?
$\sqrt{\cdot}$ is a surd
OmnipotentEntity
and yes exactly.
Closed by @wooden citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I'm really confused on the b) part of this question? How do I find the standard deviation and interval estimate?
standard deviation is kind of tricky to calculate. do you have a graphing calculator?
Yes
a ti-nspire?
oh yeah
hm i have a cx 2
if you go into the calculator part and press the book icon, then press s and scroll you should find a stDev option somewhere
okay
oh wait im sorry ive totally misunderstood your question
oh its okay
@scenic shell Has your question been resolved?
@scenic shell Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @scenic shell
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Translation: Both squares are the same size. Show that the shadowed places in the squares has the same area
My work kinda messy
For the first square the area for the shadow part is
16r^2 - 4pi r^2
And the second square is
r^2 - pi r^2
Here's how I'd start: $A_{1}=\left[Area\ of\ square\right]-\left[Area\ of\ the\ 4\ small\ circles\right]$
de är inte samma r
det skulle vara bättre om du tog l som kvadratens sidlängd
eftersom l är samma för båda kvadraterna
Förstår de har samma längd
tar du r som i den första kvadraten?
$A_{1}=\left(x^{2}\right)-\left[4\left(\pi\left(\frac{r}{2}\right)^{2}\right)\right]$
$A_{2}=\left(x^{2}\right)-\left(\pi r^{2}\right)$
hello
Nej andra
Why r/2
okay maybe english would be better
It's because each of the smaller circle's radius is half of the larger one in the 2nd square.
yep precisely
I get it
Refer to the image you sent. You can visually check that.
if you were to do this, you would get that
r_1 (first square) = l/4
and
r_2 (second square) = l/2
and you can plug those in directly
My next step from there:
$A_{1}=\left(x^{2}\right)-\left[4\left(\pi\left(\frac{r^{2}}{4}\right)\right)\right]$
$A_{2}=\left(x^{2}\right)-\left(\pi r^{2}\right)$
hello
And then cancelling out the 4:
$A_{1}=\left(x^{2}\right)-\left(\pi r^{2}\right)$
$A_{2}=\left(x^{2}\right)-\left(\pi r^{2}\right)$
hello
And the pi r^2
if the two expressions look the same then you are done
The radius is not the diameter. The diameter would've been the side length of the square.
The radius is half of the square's side length.
Isn’t the diameter 2r
Yes.
It is. Just remember to substitute "2r" into both expressions for the areas.
I still don’t quite understand the r/2 can you explain
yes, you still have to use r/2 for each small circle's area.
Each of the small circle's radius is r/2.
"r" is the larger circle's radius
Yeah the second circle/2
Oh yeah
Otherwise if you use r for both
It dosent work
Because they aren’t the same length
Ohhh alright thank you so much
You're welcome.
Closed by @tribal root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did my teacher make a mistake? Our answers don't match, idk how she got that answer
\left( \frac{12.5 + 15 - 8}{5.25} \right) + \left( \frac{18}{3} + 2.4 \times \left(14.44\right) \right) - \frac{15.6}{3.9}
convert yds to feet bruh
units man units
Or convert ft to yds.
Whar
im gonna be honest im not american so i dont know what the uhh conversion methods are
but you can probably google it
Convert 200 yards to feet. 1 yard is 3 feet.
hi
.close
Closed by @sick bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Consider randomly selecting 4 cards from a standard 52-card deck. Let the random variable X denote the number of different card ranks in your hand. What is the expected value of X?
Is there a general setup for this? Say there were n possible ranks, m suits, and you were drawing k cards. Is there a good way to count the number of "different" objects selected in a sample, using some equivalence relation (in this case, suits)
@bleak tide Has your question been resolved?
This problem can be solved just by knowing the definition of expectation:
Find the number of possible selections of 4 cards(52 choose 4).
How many of those selections have only one rank?(13)
How many have only 2 different ranks?(13*12*2).
How many selections have 3 different ranks?
(You find out, say there are x such)
how many have 4 different ranks?
(You find out, say there are y such)
Then the expected value of X will just be
[1*13+2*(13*12*2)+3*x+4*y]/(52 choose 4)
By definition of expectation
Closed by @bleak tide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Well what i am saying is that the general setup will also just be to go by the definition of expectation
The problem of counting different objects upto some equivalence can have varying levels of difficulty and there is no known "general method" to easily count them
I intended for my solution to be something from which you infer these facts
If you found my answer to not be satisfactory, you can reopen and wait for a more satisfactory answer
I realized I need to focus on finishing this assignment for now, I might try and figure out a generalized version later but I don't really have time now I think, and I don't want to clutter this up by leaving an open help thread
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know how to do long division but I keep doing it wrong when its so many variables
do you mean terms? there's only one variable.
but that doesn't really affect the division algorithm. can you show your work?
Closed by @upper forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you do part d? trying to use the formula for the sum of a geometric sequence instead of just writing each term then adding it
for part ii* i can do part i of course
add and subtract S_4 to both sides of part i
rather
if you take the sum on the left hand side of (i)
and add and subtract S4 from it
you're adding 0
Brute force
but it allows you to use the geometric sum formula
They said they wanted to use geometric series formula
a
just plug in the values in the formula xd
a(1-r^n)/(1-r)
a is the first value
r is the ratio
Adding on to what gfaupax said, in general $\sum_{k=0}^a=\sum_{k=0}^b-\sum_{k=a-1}^b$ (ignore the shit notation)
;(
but does this not find the sum from the first term to n, whilst i want the sum from what... the 5th term to the 8th?
first term(5th term) to next n terms
but thats the formula for the sum of a geometric sequence... i dont understand why you say this wont get the sum from the first term
You could try this out, as a more clear approach
look at the screenshot I send
the answer is the same
try to prove the geometric formula, then you will understand
i didnt know if youd have to try and find a where the sequence starts from n=1 (not 5 like the sigma notation). as in, youd have a * r^(n-1) so the first term would be a * r^(1-1) which is of course just equal to a. then youd do the s8-s5 using that initial a value. i kind of understand how this works now
Closed by @lilac vortex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
Did you find the angles first?
@fast fable Has your question been resolved?
Yes, I was thinking about getting the area of the two circular sectors and rest them but I don’t know if that is the right way
It’s the right way. You draw a perpendicular from B onto AC, therefore creating two similar triangles (ones with same angles as original triangle). Then for one part of the sector it’s the area of the sector minus the area of the triangle and same with the other part of the sector. Then you add both together to find the area of A2
Does the problem specify that those curves are circular arcs? If so, then you can definitely do that way
No problem
You just saved my exam
Happy to help :)))
You can type .close or press the tick here if you don’t have any more questions. Otherwise press the X if you have more questions to ask
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the maximum of $\frac{x!}{\left(x-k\right)!k!\left(x^{k}\right)}$ if k is a whole number and it ranges from 0 to x, where x is a (large) natural number.
Philosopher King
$\binom{x}{k} x^{-k}$?
Ann
call your expression $a_k$, work out the ratio $\frac{a_{k+1}}{a_k}$
Ann
Failed to get a response from Wolfram Alpha.
If the problem persists, please contact support.
(x!)/[(x-k-1)!(k+1)!(x^(k+1))] = a_(k+1)
a_k = (x!)/[(x-k)!(k!)(x^k)]
a_(k+1) / a_n = (x-k)/[(x)(k)]?
Ann
Yes.
think about what you can say about this fraction
and what it has to do with maximizing a_k
(x-k)/[(k+1)x] = (1 - k/x)/[k+1]
This decreases clearly as k increases, since the numerator decreases and the denominator increases.
why would i ask you to work out the ratio between two adjacent terms in your sequence?
can it be tied back to the increase/decrease behavior of the sequence a_k, and if so, how?
a_(k+1) = a_k * (1-k/x)/[k+1].
Let (1-k/x)/[k+1] = R_k.
R_0 = 1/1 = 1
So a_(1) = a_0
R_1 = (1-1/x)/(2) < 1
Similarly, R_2 = (1-2/x)/[3]
So a_3 < a_2 and so on.
a_0 = a_1 > a_2 > a_3 > a_4 > .....?
<@&286206848099549185>
Sorry to jump in here, but is it fine that we can prove that || C(x,k) ≤ x^k || by a combinatorial proof and then deduce when equality holds by providing examples?
this is a lot of writing to say "The ratio is always <1 and so the sequence a_k (which is made of only positive terms) is decreasing."
eh that works ig
@brittle badge anyway, now that you know a_k is decreasing: where will the biggest term of a decreasing sequence be found?
idk
We can probably use a combinatorial proof here, but maybe first follow what Ann is doing which is more of the algebra proof
Yes that’s right
okay thankd
All good, do you want to hear the combinatorial proof as well?
yes
yes
the biggest term of a decreasing sequence is found at its beginning
this, i would imagine, is not a difficult insight to make
Ok, so like Ann did we can first rewrite the expression as C(x,k) * x^-k. Now C(x,k) is the number of ways to select k distinct members out of a total of x members. x^k is the number of ways to select k members out of the total x members where you can pick the same member again (repetition is allowed). What does this tell us in terms of C(x,k) and x^k?
@brittle badge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brittle badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am watching Veritasium video and stuck at this part. Where is this formula or function came from?. I guess it is about axiom of choices and vitali set but i don't know exactly what it implies.
the union of a countable number of disjoint copies of V contains [0,1] and so has measure at least 1, but is itself contained in [-1,2] and so has measure at most 3
that's what the formula is saying
why most 3
what's the length of [-1,2]
so 3 mean 3 sets or what?
lambda() is Lebesgue measure
which is a generalization and formalization of the concept of length
the reason we add infinitely many copies of it is because we are trying to figure out what the measure of the Vitali set V should be
and we know something about the union of infinitely many shifted copies of V
iirc he specifies the axioms for a measure somewhere...
ok thanks i think i need to learn about Lebesgue measure then.
this is the measure (specifically lebesgue measure) of a set V, or, intuitively, length.
What is done here is they shifted this set V a lot of times: by how they defined V, these "shifts" are disjoint (meaning that , given two different shift, they do not have common elements).
What we want in a measure is for it to be "countably additive": that if we seperate a set S into different components (countably many), the "length" of S should be equal to sum of length of each component.
Another property we want is that if S has some length, and is a subset of T of some other length, then the length of S must be smaller than the length of T (so we don't want a set containing less elements to have more length).
Lastly, the length should be invariant over shifts. if you shift a set to the left/right, the length should be the same.
If you combine these three properties, The video showed that it is not possible for every set to have length. In particular, V cannot have a length: if it did have a length, then we can sum over all the shifts, it should have length between 1 and 3 (since it contains [0,1] but is contained in [-1,2]). But you can't have a number, added infinitely many times, to be between 1 and 3, contradiciton!
for "countably additive" I should emphasize that the components must be disjoint! otherwise you get weird stuff like length of [0,1] +length of [0,2] =length of [0,2] (1+2=2?absurd!)
countable additivity (or at least finite additivity) is used all the time when you find areas of shapes in 2D, or volumes in 3D, by breaking up into pieces and adding up the area or volume respectively of each piece
so it is related integral?
there is a whole lot to talk about! given a way to measure things, you can define integral with respect to this measure.
yeah it is but the idea of a measure itself is more basic in a way
thanks a lot
what do you mean when you write 1 year = 1 day = 1/365days?
1 year != 1 day?
what is 1/365 days? 1 day in a year?
uhm his bio
oh that, it was me memeing

Closed by @opaque lodge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in which cases would an answer be extraneous or no solution altogether
you shouldnt get anything extraneous here
.close
Closed by @wooden citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what's the math of gravity and why's the math of gravity
so like
u got a universe
empty
vector 0
nothing present
and u have an object A
in there
but A cannot realize itself without an object B, as to measure itself in terms, only can it do with something relative
so
A says
The standard measurement in this world is gonna be me
okay
and B arrives somehow
B says " I wanna measure myself"
A says " Oh, you're like 2 times bigger than me "
It’s too ambiguous what you’re trying to say, something of a thought experiment?
and B says " oh so you're 0.5 B? "
yes but a meaningful thought experiment
to understand the universe and why gravity exists and how it is
You cannot do that in terms of such thought experiments mate
and A says " nah we can't change everytime something bigger comes.
so let me be A as standard and you as 2 A"
this is more philosophical than scientific
it's not a thought experiment
it's just asking how and why gravity
mainly maths
okay so now they have vectors and measurements and stuff and then time arrives after them realizing A turns around some in a motion
but
how does
gravity arrive
why is A attracted to B
what's the general formula to find it out?
then why's the general formula to find it out? like why's that, that the universe acts upon a certain situation where bigger mass attracts others
surely it cannot be just a sentence on a paper or a logic of "bigger means more powerful"
because universe doesn't have a mind to be biased
so
are we
all falling?
at the same time
in a direction
even so
how do bigger things attract each other here
so falling might not be true here
what if
the reason why bigger things attract more than small things and the reason things even attract each other
is because of something else?
something like a new constant of measuring like distance and time
we cannot know what that process is because we are limited to the matter around us
but we do know how that process results (i.e bigger things attract more than small things and all things attract each other)
maybe
just maybe
we can try to figure out that process using the constants we have over here
and not end up in a random theory but rigorous mathematical truth
hmm
how would we do it
let's bring some notations
To find process X-
X happens -(results in)- M{A|B}
process x, happens which results in matter's behavior of A- all things attract each other, B - bigger things attract more than smaller
how to find process X which makes this happen now
hmm
we need philosophy, maths and physics here
wish there was a chat which involved all 3
anyways
let me see what we have in our world rn
time, constant T
does time matter in gravity?
like does time affect the M{A|B}
hmmmm
yes but time is just a measurement not a process
earth might attract Mars in Z number of years
but Z cannot change without the process changing and Z doesn't matter here we can't change Z on its own without the process changing
because Z is a constant, every process has a certain fixed Z time resultance
okay
re arranging this
X -results- M{A|B~T}
the process happens in Time measurement T
okay
this constant wasn't really useful
now moving on
distance?
distance hmm
distance doesn't matter if u think about it
because
the farther u are, the smaller it is
and the nearer u are, the bigger it is
so distance doesn't change anything, and we find out that A and B are variables and not constant because of distance (I mean that they change even though their matter is same, so as B comes nearer A appears Bigger and so does B, vice versa for farther and smaller)
re arranging this
X -results- M{A|B~T (A>-<B ~ D-/ A<->B ~ D+)
so
Matters A and B attract each other during a resultance constant time T
and as distance reduces (D-) A and B become larger to themselves and each other If and only If
this is a math help channel dude
u are just yapping
no
I need help
with things like
giving me constants
etc..
while I figure out gravity
figure out gravity?
And as distance increases (D+) A and B become smaller to themselves on the perspective of each other
yea
damn noble cause
like do u know why gravity's here?
I don't even think u know what happens if 3 bodies gravitate each other
do u know why anything is here
I'm tryna figure out that dude don't be a narcissist and stop something that's tryna reason things out
im just saying u have to accept some things and cant go around questioning everything
there's already been a three body problem which says even slightest of changes matter divergently
and double pendulum
example.
so
we need to understand
how gravity works and why is it here even with an unbiased universe
then we might be able to
make something work out and develop a more better way to
uh yk predict motion around and gravity
now let's not get diverted
so
we know where constant of time is and what it does here
we know what constant of distance does here
but
it all really is the same and follows the laws of;
all objects attract each other
Bigger objects attract more
let's try out on a new constant rather than distance or time
hmmmmmm
light? does light affect gravity
obviously not
but
not obviously, maybe?
because like
light does affect gravity
if u see something coming towards u
wavelengths of light are on u and that
but
hmmmmm
but like
it can emit light and stop, because of the distance we'd see it in past tense
okay
hmm
nah light is too insignificant here
although very much present
so
a new constant we need
time okay, distance okay
what about
speed
@eager stone does speed affect gravity
Hmm
wait we haven't thought of this
does the sun moving in a direction affect the pull of it on earth
dude can someone help me?
bro 😭
The General Theory of Relativity tells us gravity is not a force, gravitational fields don't exist. Objects tend to move on straight paths through curved spacetime. Thanks to Caséta by Lutron for sponsoring this video. Find out more at: https://www.lutron.com/veritasium
Huge thanks to Prof. Geraint Lewis for hours of consulting on this video s...
uh
what does he say
speed affects gravity?
dude
I don't want to be biased towards what he says
I want this to form of my own thesis of this
someone tell me
does speed affect gravity
🙏
O dear Lord provide me with a human to guide my noble causes
O generous behemoth grant me a user to answer my repenting question
and I shall be in your service for the rest of eternity
...
what do u need @sage tiger
uh
does
gravity affect speed
no no I mean
does speed
affect gravity
gravity is just 9.8 m/s
no like
ultamitely gracity does affect the froce velocity
ya
u moving does it affect your gravitational pull or something else pulling u
ur weight times the gravtational force is equal to the force pulling you toward the earth
i meant to say mass
I don't think speed comes into the equation
that's how it works ig
the sun moving in a direction (typically around the milkyway)
can it not affect it's pull on us?
why not
do u know for sure
not really
read this
but
Acceleration
can come
without gravity as well
not of it only
what so then
but ag is the symbol shown for accelaration of gravity
9.8 m/s
<@&286206848099549185> anyone wanna help this guy
i agree with this kind of
Did we test if a pencil's pull on an eraser is the same as the same pencil's pull on a 1500km/h's eraser, vice versa
is that a vector?
what direction is it going on
then it will simply be the same
beritcally oppositley away
then of course with that velocity it will go away
north of the pencil
yeah but
does the gravity of the pencil or eraser
differ
there
not center of the earth
think about it
Forget earth forget university
wtf do u mean
there's a pencil and an eraser in the universe alone
does the gravitational field of the pencil
which acts upon the eraser
equal to the gravitational field of rhe p ncil
which acts upon the eraser which moves?
$$F_G = G\frac{m_1\cdot m_2}{d^2}$$
$$g_{m1} = \frac{F_G}{m_2}$$
$$g_{m2} = \frac{F_G}{m_1}$$
@autumn girder
sir what is your question i dont think even you know what ur talking about
uh
the fields are not equal, the forces are equal if the masses are equal though
ong
My question is
but the forces would be minimal
.close lol
does the velocity of object B affect it's gravitational pull (considering both case scenario's mass is the same)
(equal in magnitude, not in direction ofc)
sybau
Can you
Explain me
These 3 things
welp
guess gravity is not my thing
how about something else that governs the universe
sir no offense but if u dont know newtons law of universal gravitation i dont think you should be trying to reconstruct the idea of gravity from scratch without a physics or math background to support you
hey I'm a high school student (just started hs) stop calling me sir.
and what if newton didn't exist and I have to develop universal gravitation
well newton did exist and you are not newton
what ?
instead of just mass = pull
why what
because an object with more mass has a larger gravitational force sir
okay
so
why am I not
infinitely travelling through space
other atoms
attract me
????????????
and if all my atoms
Are attracted by other atoms
then why am I not attracted towards those atoms
well, the force is distance dependent
and why don't I move towards it irl seemingly
I see
I see
well yes I know
but okay so that's a dumb question
closer objects, like earth, exert more force
do u know how much an atom weighs
what
take earth as the measurement in terms of standard weight, no kgs no grams etc..
it weights about 0.0000 something etc.. Earths
sir thats not how we calculate the weight of subatomic particles
we dont use earth as standard measurement
kg
you use a standard measurement xyz
or atomic mass unit
an atom weighs approximately xyz power n
sir im going to stop u right there
y
because i dont even know why youre trying to reinvent physics or change the SI units of mass
it makes no sense
yes and i told u the si units
what are you talking about "power n"
I think he means the orders of magnitude
supposedly, your si unit is x and it weighs 1 atom
well then for kg its 10^-27
then the weight of an atom
is xyz power n where insert your si unit which weighs 1 atom
so 1 power 1

sir
every element has differing atomic structure
By the way @sage tiger
DO
NOT
WRITE
LIKE
THIS
!!
It's VERY DIFFICULT to read you
@sage tiger We don't understand the mechanism behind gravity, so there isn't really a proper answer to why it does what it does, but you can understand its behaviour through observation and depending on what big ideas you start with. The universal gravitational constant is really just a value we calibrate through observation to collapse the proportionality into an equality. Disagreements with observation probe new ideas which naturally led to treating gravity not like a force, but instead a curvature of spacetime :)) hope that clears up any initial confusion you might've had
And also you'd better take some time to reformulate your thoughts in a concise manner, otherwise it's just a meaningless flow of consciousness
@sage tiger
this was a good read
i think introducing the idea of spacetime curvature might be too complex for them
the maths yes but the idea no
i hope they willl not be tempted to reinvent einsten's theory of general relativity

@sage tiger Has your question been resolved?
vroski asking if gravity has been resolved 🥀
ah I see
hmm
yea
relativity
hmm
relativity
the idea that time is relative
and everything is relative
should have been invented
hundreds of years ago
in the 1800s
Alfred Adler
a psychologist
proposed a hypothesis
" All problems are Interspersonal relationship problems"
sir u should stop while ur ahead 🙏
I disagree. Keep cooking.
js wait 3 mins you'll make sense of what I say
relatives, gravity, surely there is some yo mama joke here
basically like, all problems are caused by humans and animals around us
but
u ask a question
" wtf how does me falling off a tree caused by some animal or human "
but
the thing is
sir did an apple fall on ur head
you only have to do it once to
realize that it's pain
so hypothetically
in a world without any animals (large enough to see) and humans
you climbed it in the first place 
where earth and the universe is present
you'd eventually not do things which you know (have experienced) as painful
so then, once u do enough things and only u exist
no one would give you pain other than your willingness
Keep cooking. I repeat: Keep cooking.
you wouldn't survivalistically get much pain
bro is never getting green role
LMFAO