#help-27

1 messages · Page 327 of 1

lime plaza
#

Ok so u write it as

#

(-infinity , 0]

#

So the brackets () mean the value is not included and [] means the value is included

normal bolt
#

0 is included and -infinity is excluded

lime plaza
#

Yes

#

Do you know the value of -infinity?

full cloak
#

you never include infinity as they aren't really numbers, but just an idea

#

that applies to negative infinity as well

normal bolt
lime plaza
#

Exactly

#

That is why we don't include it

#

We don't know what that is

#

So did you understand how to find domain and range

normal bolt
lime plaza
#

Tell me the value of -infinity

#

The exact value

normal bolt
#

can't

lime plaza
#

Then we cannot include it

#

Infinity and -infinity are always () excluded

normal bolt
#

the reason being is we can't tell its value?

lime plaza
#

Uh yes

normal bolt
#

can we write that interval as [0 , -infinity)

lime plaza
#

-infinity just tells us that the value keeps going more negative

#

So basically

#

Do u know the number line

normal bolt
#

yup

lime plaza
#

In number line it's NEGATIVE then ZERO then POSITIVE

normal bolt
#

- values , 0 +values

lime plaza
#

Hence negative to 0 then 0 to positive

#

Yes

#

That is why I wrote (-infinity,0]

#

It goes according to the number line

#

But if you want to write it the other way you can

normal bolt
#

got it

lime plaza
#

Ok so try 2nd question

normal bolt
#

so domain is all the input values to define f(X) and range is set of values of input from domain

lime plaza
#

Yes range is output you get by inputting values from domain

normal bolt
#

let me work 2nd

lime plaza
#

k

normal bolt
#

domain = R
range = [3,3]

#

@lime plaza

lime plaza
#

uh

#

No

#

Domain is wrong

#

x=5

#

Tell me

normal bolt
#

negative root

lime plaza
#

is that defined

normal bolt
#

no

lime plaza
#

Then?

#

How is domain=R

normal bolt
#

no its not

lime plaza
#

Then tell me domain

normal bolt
#

domain = {x : -3 <= x <= 3}
range = [3,3]

#

both are same thing

#

ig

#

well

#

i got it

#

domain = 0
range = 0

lime plaza
#

Ok domain is [-3,3]

normal bolt
#

is this correct domain = {x : -3 <= x <= 3}

lime plaza
#

You can write it as [-3,3]

normal bolt
#

fine

#

range = {-3,..,0,..3}

lime plaza
#

ok tell me what number you enter

#

to get -3

#

Don't use {} btw they represent a single element

normal bolt
lime plaza
#

Then why do you include that

normal bolt
#

it is possible for x because x^2 = (-3)^2 = 0

lime plaza
#

huh?

#

$f(x)=\sqrt{9-x^2}$

woven radishBOT
#

devthemasked

lime plaza
#

What x will you enter

normal bolt
#

f(-3) = √(9 - (-3)^2)
=> 0

#

here ^

lime plaza
#

Yes so how did you get -3 as output

normal bolt
#

we can't get

lime plaza
#

Yea then what is your range

normal bolt
#

[0, 3]

lime plaza
#

Uh wait

#

I think you are

normal bolt
#

domain = [-3,3]
range = [0,3]

lime plaza
#

Uh I'm not entirely sure

#

About range

#

Ok it's fine

lime plaza
normal bolt
#

ok

#

clear

#

😄

#

What is the purpose of function in life?

#

How it is helpful?

lime plaza
#

No idea

#

Just do math cause math is fun

normal bolt
#

What problem did mathematicians trying to solve that they had to invent functions?

lime plaza
#

I don't know

normal bolt
#

fine

#

what is the meaning of this f(x) = {x, x>=0 , -x, x < 0 in modulus function

#

@lime plaza

lime plaza
#

Ok so

#

Modulus opens with a sign

#

Modulus has to be always positive

#

Hence when |x| x is positive that means |x| is same as x

#

But in |x| if x is negative then it would be |-x| but modulus is always positive

#

So it opens with a negative sign

#

|-x| will be -(-x)

normal bolt
#

so |-3| = -3?

lime plaza
#

no

#

|-3|= -(-3)

#

Modulus always positive

#

If number inside is negative it needs to make it positive

normal bolt
#

from where the extra - come?

lime plaza
#

Modulus opens with a negative sign

lime plaza
#

Modulus can open with a + or with a - it depends on the number inside

normal bolt
#

so if f(-5) = |-5| = 5?

lime plaza
#

yes

#

if f(x)= |x| then yea

#

f(-5)= 5

normal bolt
#

f(-x) = |-x| = -(-x)

lime plaza
#

Yes

normal bolt
#

i didn't understand why the extra -ve sign

lime plaza
#

Do you know that modulus range is positive?

normal bolt
#

no

lime plaza
#

Ok modulus range is always positive and 0 is included

#

f(x)= |x|

#

f(-2) = 2

normal bolt
#

and modulus domain is real number?

lime plaza
#

f(2) = 2

#

Both are same

#

Modulus is always positive

#

So if number is negative we multiply with a - to make it positive

normal bolt
#

it means it range is [0, infinity)

lime plaza
#

no

#

[0,infinity)

#

yes

normal bolt
#

that was bracket mistake

lime plaza
#

{} means a single element

normal bolt
#

yeah

lime plaza
#

Ok so u understood or

normal bolt
#

we use in defining set

#

how to understand its graph

#

like feel it

lime plaza
#

It's graph is a slope

#

Like

#

Straight lines*

#

Draw 2 symmetric straight lines from 0

#

at angle 45

#

Or I will show

normal bolt
lime plaza
normal bolt
#

why is it like this

#

why that line is going in -ve x-axis

lime plaza
#

Domain

#

Can be negative

#

I don't know much about graphs

normal bolt
#

its alright

#

i understood that

#

thanks

lime plaza
#

:)

#

if done .close

devout snowBOT
#

@normal bolt Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @normal bolt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

normal bolt
#

What does this highlighted box part want to mean? I can't see the things on the fig 12.1 as mentioned in text.

normal bolt
#

basically i want someone to explain read box text

ripe flax
#

for the first one

pure flower
#

what is this from

ripe flax
#

its basically explaining how to get a gradient from a curve

normal bolt
ripe flax
#

so yeah u could basically draw a tangent line to a specific point and that would be it

#

but it wont be that exact would it

pure flower
#

why is there physics here lol

ripe flax
#

so we start by drawing something we know is exact first, a line intersecting the curve twice

#

its not the same as the tangent line

#

but move the points of intersection closer together

#

does it look like a bit more like the tangent line

#

so just do that and that and that

normal bolt
#

intersection of that chord?

ripe flax
#

yes

#

just move one of the points closer and closer to the point u want

#

but we want to be exact we’re mathematicians

#

lemme draw a graph hold on

normal bolt
#

yes please, i wanna understand everything basically or fundamentally

ripe flax
#

say a simple graph y=x^2

pure flower
#

if you have zero calculus fundamentals, you might wanna watch the 3b1b series on it

normal bolt
ripe flax
#

u have 2 points u can intersect with a line easily

ripe flax
#

say one point is fixed: (x,x^2)

#

its called a secant line

normal bolt
#

in (x,x^2) where is x^2

ripe flax
#

it dont look like a tangent line yet but we will make it look like one

#

something like this

#

because y=x^2

#

sub y in for x^2, so (x,y) becomes (x,x^2)

normal bolt
#

oh

ripe flax
#

and say we have another point

#

but this time its not the same point

normal bolt
#

and h is the distance on x-axis from fpoint x?

ripe flax
#

h is the distance from the point u want to any point u place on the graph

normal bolt
#

ok

ripe flax
#

h could be 100 or 0.4 and we would still have the same, if ur original point is fixed

ripe flax
#

heres a cool thing we can do to make this line a tangent line tho

ripe flax
normal bolt
ripe flax
#

yes

pure flower
#

do you know limits?

ripe flax
#

if we move the points closer to our original point

#

h gets smaller

normal bolt
#

move the second point along the parabola curve to the first point?

ripe flax
#

and the approximation for the tangent line is better

#

but we could do better

#

we could make h closer and closer and closer

#

so close that there is so little distance between them

#

like 0.000000000001

#

but we disregard that, since its so small its not gonna change shit

normal bolt
#

that is approximately 0 by rounding off?

ripe flax
#

yes

#

so as h approaches 0

#

so the point is moving towards the original point

#

it slowly becomes more of a tangent line

normal bolt
ripe flax
#

therefore we can find the gradient as h approaches to 0

ripe flax
#

it never gets to 0, otherwise the 2 points overlap

#

and we cant get a line from that

#

but can u see that

#

if h is so small so small

#

we can disregard that value altogether

#

cuz its ultimately not gonna make a difference

normal bolt
ripe flax
#

essentially the gap is there but we dont care

ripe flax
normal bolt
#

do we round off actually?

ripe flax
#

so in proper notation we would do something like this

pure flower
#

this might sound wishy washy but dont let that dissaude you

pure flower
pure flower
ripe flax
#

lim h->0 means as h gets so close to 0 that we could just say its 0 we dont care

#

the right hand side is just the gradient function

#

(x+h)^2 -x^2 is just the rise

#

h is the run

#

rise/run

normal bolt
#

wait let me absorb this 2 min and ask you doubt if i get

pure flower
#

just remember that

pure flower
#

pitfall prevention

ripe flax
#

just not sure everyone can grasp the idea of infinity thats all

normal bolt
pure flower
#

they're british, presumably

ripe flax
ripe flax
#

so slope is rise/run

pure flower
#

mfw to call the slope the gradient so i sound like i know multivariable calculus 😔

ripe flax
#

nah the brits jsut call it that

#

i stay with it cuz it sounds cool

normal bolt
pure flower
ripe flax
woven radishBOT
pure flower
#

whoopsie daisy

ripe flax
#

funny thing most of the time we use y instead of f(x)

pure flower
#

well it's f(x+h) in the definition sooo

normal bolt
ripe flax
pure flower
woven radishBOT
pure flower
#

okay ill stick to nitpicks here i like how you're dealing with the derivatives 101 class llol /gen

ripe flax
#

for the first point its (x,x^2) just sub y in

#

for the second point however, its (x+h, and something else

#

that something, is because y=x^2, would it make sense to the y value to be y=(x+h)^2

#

im just adding some value to the x

normal bolt
#

got it

ripe flax
#

nice

normal bolt
#

when we say h -> 0 do we mean the distance of h is changing towards 0 or is it going towards (0,0) which is origin

ripe flax
normal bolt
#

but it makes sense that h can't approach (0,0) but any point on parabola can

ripe flax
#

heres the thing

#

we dc about the origin

#

because say f(x)=x^2 and g(x) = x^2 +1

#

they look the same but g(x) does not pass thru the origin

normal bolt
ripe flax
#

if you substitute x=0 to g(x), (0)^2+1 =1

#

the y value does not equal 0

#

therefore it does not intersect the origin

normal bolt
#

oohh

#

got it now

ripe flax
#

so yeah not every parabola crosses the origin

normal bolt
#

how does it changes by only adding +1

ripe flax
#

by adding 1 to f(x)

#

can u see every y value has shifted by 1

#

so say a point is (2,4)

#

now its transformed to (2,5)

#

because we added a 1 on top

normal bolt
#

oh

#

what about a cubic polynomial like this

ripe flax
#

same thing

#

if u add 1, the y value would shift all by 1

normal bolt
#

will that limit concept work with f(x) = x^3 too?

pure flower
ripe flax
#

but u need to evaluate the limit first

pure flower
#

please

ripe flax
#

on the right we have say like ((x+h)^2 -x^2) all over a measly little h

#

we know that h is basically 0

#

but we cant divide by 0

normal bolt
#

then?

ripe flax
#

so we try to expand the numerator first see if we can factorise anything

pure flower
#

In fancy terms $\frac{d}{dx} f(c) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(c+h) - f(c)}{h}$, which is the (kinda) formal definition of the derivative.

ripe flax
#

yes

pure flower
#

fuck

#

not infty lmao

woven radishBOT
ripe flax
#

ah close enough

pure flower
#

major whoopsie daisy but we're so back

ripe flax
#

infinitely small more like

#

expand the numerator out u get x^2 +2xh + h^2 -x^2

#

do u see anything nice

#

the x^2s cancel each other

#

so we’re left with 2xh + h^2 left

#

since the denominator is an h

pure flower
#

yes it's actually $\lim_{h \to \lim_{c \to \infty} \left(\frac{1}{c}\right)}$ lmao

woven radishBOT
ripe flax
#

we can factor the h out

#

h(2x+h) all over h

#

so the 2 h’s cancel

pure flower
#

ill leave now

ripe flax
#

we have 2x+h left

#

but since i said h is basically 0 in this scenario

normal bolt
#

@ripe flax explain me the x^3 thing

ripe flax
#

would it be sensible to substitute as h=0

ripe flax
woven radishBOT
#

Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.

ripe flax
#

,rotate

woven radishBOT
ripe flax
#

hope this helps a bit

normal bolt
#

yeah more clear

#

so limit process is all about finding the gradient?

ripe flax
#

yes

#

u can even do it with x^4, hell even sinx

normal bolt
#

is that l'hospital is also limit rule?

ripe flax
normal bolt
#

i also didn't

ripe flax
#

i learn it in 5 months time cuz my curriculum is scuffed

#

i learned all of basic integration before hospital lol

normal bolt
#

is this called fundamental theorm of calculus?

ripe flax
#

its called differentiation from first principles in my country

#

idk about urs

#

but yes its the first thing u learn in calculus

winter patrol
#

,tex .ftc

#

1 sec

normal bolt
# woven radish

f(x) = x^2 takes very close values to 0 and f(x) = x^2 =+ 1 does not?

#

not this ss but you got it

#

ok i close this

ripe flax
#

ok

normal bolt
#

.cloaw

#

.cloaw

#

lol

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @normal bolt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

winter patrol
#

,tex .FTC1

woven radishBOT
#

ℝαμOmeganato5

winter patrol
#

,tex .FTC2

woven radishBOT
#

ℝαμOmeganato5

pure flower
#

ftc is about integrals from riemann sums and limits of antiderivatives

pure flower
#

i think its more like leibniz

#

isn't ftc 2 $\frac{d}{dx} \int^x_a f(t) dt = f(x)$

woven radishBOT
pure flower
#

like the simple version

winter patrol
#

yeh, the one above is more general

pure flower
#

hmm

#

yeah just checking

pure flower
winter patrol
#

custom, from riemann and snow

pure flower
#

oooh

#

fun

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pale thistle
#

broooooooooooooooooooo

devout snowBOT
pale thistle
#

i have a big doubt

iron kindle
#

ok

pure flower
#

very good

lime plaza
devout snowBOT
#

@pale thistle Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

solid hull
#

what is this question asking?

devout snowBOT
topaz axle
#

true or false

#

likely

solid hull
#

are we attempting to show equivalence between the two statements?

sullen island
#

the whole thing is one statement

solid hull
#

can I clarify what the tribar means in context

#

as in what would we want to show (it's a T/F q)

sullen island
#

I know what it means, it's not like I need clarification

solid hull
#

lol

sand dove
#

it's equivalence/congruence modulo 2

solid hull
#

so do you apply modulo 2 to both 17 and 5 and check if they are equal?

sand dove
#

$a\equiv b \mod n$ means $a-b = kn, k\in \bZ$

woven radishBOT
#

rafilou is not not born in 2003

sand dove
#

sure

#

otherwise

#

computing a-b and seeing if it's a multiple of 2 doesn't hurt

solid hull
#

alright, I'll try that thanks

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @solid hull

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

primal hollow
#

Limit $\lim_{x\to\a} f(x^2)$

devout snowBOT
woven radishBOT
#

cleavemelons
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

primal hollow
#

um sorry I don't really know how to use latex

runic prawn
#

is f continuous

#

$\lim_{x\to a} f(x^2)$

primal hollow
#

anyhow I don't understand the general epsilon delta proof of the limit of x² when x aproaches a

woven radishBOT
#

martingale

primal hollow
#

yes thanks

primal hollow
runic prawn
#

or do just mean $\lim_{x\to a} x^2$

woven radishBOT
#

martingale

primal hollow
#

yes

#

that's how it's witten in my notes

runic prawn
#

let $\epsilon > 0 $

#

find $$\delta > 0$$ such that $$|x- a| < \delta \implies |x^2 - a^2| < \epsilon $$

woven radishBOT
#

martingale

primal hollow
#

without a right zo biger than a

runic prawn
runic prawn
primal hollow
runic prawn
#

|x-a| * |x+a| <= |x-a| *( |x-a| + 2|a| )

primal hollow
#

||x|-|a|| les than or eaqual to |x-a| les than 1

primal hollow
#

he reasons that |x-a| must me les than 1 at some point

runic prawn
#

remember a is fixed

primal hollow
runic prawn
primal hollow
#

I know

runic prawn
primal hollow
#

no than

runic prawn
#

|x+a| = |(x-a) + 2a|

#

then triange ineq

primal hollow
#

I haven o idea what that is

runic prawn
#

triangle inequality?

primal hollow
#

he arives at 2|a| -1 < |x| < 2|a|+1

runic prawn
#

for all p, q

|p + q| <= |p| + |q|

#

wait u must know the triange inequality

primal hollow
runic prawn
#

ok let's forget about him for a sec

primal hollow
#

ok

runic prawn
runic prawn
#

now we pick delta

primal hollow
runic prawn
#

p = x-a, q = 2a

primal hollow
#

ah

runic prawn
#

x-a + 2a = x+a

#

ru following

primal hollow
#

yes

runic prawn
#

ru sure

primal hollow
primal hollow
runic prawn
primal hollow
#

yes

runic prawn
#

apply triangle ineq on that what do u get

#

|(x-a) + 2a| <= ... ?

primal hollow
#

|x-a| + |2a|

runic prawn
#

yes

primal hollow
#

wich is eqaual to just |x-a|+ 2|a|

runic prawn
#

so |x+a| <= |x-a|+ 2|a|

primal hollow
#

yes

#

that I understand

runic prawn
#

so
|x^2 - a^2| = |x-a| * |x+a| <= |x-a| *( |x-a| + 2|a| )

primal hollow
#

ok I think I get it

runic prawn
#

i bound it above yes

runic prawn
primal hollow
#

yes but not when x = a right?

runic prawn
#

no even then

#

then just 0<=0

primal hollow
#

oh then why do you need to exempt a from your base region

runic prawn
#

oh for the limt defn

#

umm

primal hollow
#

yes

runic prawn
#

here it works at x=a because x^2 is continous but in general it won't

#

regardless of definition

it's just a fact that

|x^2 - a^2| <= |x-a| *( |x-a| + 2|a| ) for all x

primal hollow
#

ok

runic prawn
#

but if x is such that |x - a| < 1, i.e. x in the interval (a-1, a+1),

|x^2 - a^2| <= |x-a| * (1 + 2|a|)

#

mb

primal hollow
#

um I don't get this

#

the second bit

#

the first I get

runic prawn
#

like if
|x - a| < 1 then
|x - a| + 2|a| < 1 + 2|a|
yes?

primal hollow
#

yes

runic prawn
primal hollow
#

that's the same no?

runic prawn
#

same as what

primal hollow
#

we had before

#

nothing changed

runic prawn
#

u gotta think abt for a bit

primal hollow
#

happen*

runic prawn
#

wym

#

don't think abt steps, think abt what is true

primal hollow
#

if you got |x²-a²| <= |x-a| *(1+2|a|) and you multiplie both sides by |x-a|

#

how can you get |x²-a²| <= |x-a| *(1+2|a|) again

runic prawn
primal hollow
#

what?

runic prawn
#

what hwat

primal hollow
#

I don't understand what you mean

primal hollow
primal hollow
runic prawn
#

bruh ok

#

if |x - a| < 1 then
|x - a| + 2|a| < 1 + 2|a| so
|x - a| * (|x - a| + 2|a|) < |x - a| * (1 + 2|a|)

primal hollow
#

I'm sorry I don't understand

runic prawn
#

if p < q and r > 0 then pr < qr

#

p = |x - a| + 2|a|
q = 1 + 2|a|
r = |x-a|

primal hollow
#

and where comes p from

runic prawn
#

gtg good luck

primal hollow
#

np thanks

#

bye

devout snowBOT
#

@primal hollow Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @primal hollow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fast rose
#

I saw this question earlier but I don’t understand the methodology. How do you divide by x^2 while it runs from 0 to 1?

ripe flax
#

goddamn it

fast rose
#

@lime plaza sorry for the ping, u did this earlier, can u help me if possible?

ripe flax
#

partial fractions my ass

#

or is it an arctan integral

fast rose
#

Ye I tried too but the nominator isn’t relevant ..

lime plaza
#

Divide it by x^2

fast rose
#

But it runs from 0

lime plaza
#

Who posted this question earlier

ripe flax
#

personally i’d factorise x^4 -1 into something like (x^2+1)^2 - 2x^2

fast rose
#

U can’t divide by 0 can u

ripe flax
#

then u can cancel one of the x^2 +1s

ripe flax
#

then ur left with 1/(1-x^2)

#

which is a diff of squares

#

1/(1+x)(1-x)

ripe flax
#

then do partial from there

ripe flax
nova canopy
#

guys i think im failing maths

ripe flax
#

if it were x^4 -1 i’d say (x^2+1)(x^2-1)

safe knoll
ripe flax
#

so yea just do partial fractions for 1/(1+x)(1-x)

tawny thorn
#

or if you didnt know it

#

factor the x² up

lime plaza
#

So @fast rose

#

Forget there is a integratino from 0 1

#

divide by x^2 and take x-(1/x) as t

ripe flax
#

theoretically

#

x^4 + 1 is a diff of 2 sq

lime plaza
#

You can get answer in 4 steps

ripe flax
#

using i

#

(x^2+i)(x^2-i)

lime plaza
#

Why do you want to complicate

ripe flax
#

and u know what i is: e^pi/2

ripe flax
lime plaza
#

Don't

ripe flax
#

😭

tawny thorn
lime plaza
#

It works by just dividing by x^2 and taking x-(1/x) as t

#

yes

fast rose
#

Even when u got it all

lime plaza
#

I just told you

tawny thorn
#

put x-1/x = y

lime plaza
#

Forget there are 1 to 0

#

Treat it like an indefinite integral

tawny thorn
#

(1+1/x²)dx=dy

tawny thorn
#

then change the limits of the integrals

ripe flax
tawny thorn
#

the last integral can be solved easly

#

this is the final result

ripe flax
#

inverse tan (-inf) is pi/2?

#

oh yeah its an asymptote

tawny thorn
#

btw

ripe flax
tawny thorn
#

there is an other way to solve this integral

#

by using the Beta function for Euler

#

but no need

#

@fast rose i hope that i helped you 👍

fast rose
#

Thanks for the solution and tips y’all, this gonna take a while to to sink in

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fast rose

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sweet ridge
#

What is the least multiple of 2016 whose sum of digits is 2016 ?

pseudo basin
sweet ridge
#

number has > 224 digits

#

and I got upper bound

#

for number

pseudo basin
#

and what's your upper bound then

sweet ridge
#

which was 225 digit number all 9s except last 4 which would be 8496

#

so (221 9's)8496

pseudo basin
#

hmm

#

can we go lower i wonder

#

,w factorize 2016

sweet ridge
#

we probably can

#

all hail wolfram almighty

pseudo basin
#

let's see

#

999999 is divisible by 3^2 and 7

#

so we can move a low digit up by six spots without affecting either digit sum or divisibility as long as we do not touch the last two digits

#

this improves the upper bound somewhat but does not give much info as to whether we can do even better...

devout snowBOT
#

@sweet ridge Has your question been resolved?

sweet ridge
devout snowBOT
#

@sweet ridge Has your question been resolved?

sweet ridge
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

HELP ME DAWGS

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sweet ridge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

digital egret
devout snowBOT
digital egret
#

for $||r||^2$

woven radishBOT
#

allarkvarkk

digital egret
#

do i just do like $x^2+y^2+z^2$?

woven radishBOT
#

allarkvarkk

digital egret
#

like it doesnt have the sub 1 2 or infinity so idk which to do

#

does that just mean magnitude?

devout snowBOT
#

@digital egret Has your question been resolved?

digital egret
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @digital egret

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fading hollow
devout snowBOT
sullen island
fading hollow
#

Is the answer to 1b (1+p)/6 or (4-p)/3 or are they both wrong?

sullen island
fading hollow
#

Ok

sullen island
#

how did you compute the probabilities P(X_1 = 1/2/3) ?

#

@fading hollow

fading hollow
#

I did these two different ways

#

Sorry I will need to come back in about an hour

sullen island
#

yeah idk how you're getting both of them

#

you should just get 1/3 for all

devout snowBOT
#

@fading hollow Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

umbral torrent
#

Given AB = BA , A and B both orthoonally diagonalizable, Proof AB is also orthogonally diagonalizable, $(AB)^T = (Q_A^TD_AQ_AQ_B^TD_BQ_D)^T=(Q_B^TD_B^TQ_BQ_A^TD_A^TQ_A)=Q_B^TDQ_BQ_A^TD_AQ_A= BA = AB$
So $(AB)^T=AB$, AB is symmetrical so AB is orthogonal diagonalizable

woven radishBOT
umbral torrent
#

Is this good enough proof

devout snowBOT
#

@umbral torrent Has your question been resolved?

umbral torrent
#

<@&286206848099549185>

wicked rover
#

@umbral torrent yes

umbral torrent
#

Thank you very much!

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @umbral torrent

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

wicked rover
#

np FujiPet

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ripe flax
#

firstly we can see a log graph

#

do u know what the generic log graph is shaped like

#

ok

#

lets find the asymptotes of a log base 9 x graph first

#

before doing it with the a and stuff

#

would u agree that x cannot be 0

#

now lets add an “a” inside the function

#

if an a is added inside the function, the whole graph moves left by “a” spaces

#

so essentially, the vertical asymptote(x=0) is now changed to x=-a

#

there is a new x intercept as well

#

if x=1, y=0

#

that is the x intercept

#

now move it left a units

#

then u get the new x intercept (1-a,0)

#

there is also a y intercept

#

we gotta make x=0 for it to work

#

y=log9 (a)

#

so y is log9 of a

#

new y intercept (0,log9 a)

#

so the newly transformed graph has equation y=log9 (x+a), with asymptotes x=-a, x intercepts(1-a,0) and y intercept (0,log9 a)

devout snowBOT
#

@fossil trout Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ripe grove
#

im lost on q18

devout snowBOT
ripe grove
#

wait its just cos rule

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ripe grove

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sterile musk
#

Why is there a 1/n Infront of the stigma?

devout snowBOT
polar chasm
#

*sigma

supple knot
#

just a definition

sterile musk
acoustic leaf
#

it makes the definition independent of the number of data points

polar chasm
#

my german is far from perfect, but it seems to be a formula for variance. What the formula does is that it calculates how far each of those points is from the mean and squares it (that's the (x-xmean)^2 part) and then takes the average of all those

#

and to calculate the average, you need to sum them all up and then divide it by the number of them

sterile musk
polar chasm
#

so it's basically the average square of distance between the mean and the data points

polar chasm
#

it's averaging (x-x̄)^2

#

for all x

sterile musk
#

Ahh okay I think I get it now. Thanks a lot 🙏🙏

#

. close

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sterile musk

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

agile cypress
#

how do i avoid making mistake here

devout snowBOT
agile cypress
#

2+1+x=6

#

x+3=6

#

i divided x+3=6 with 3

#

when i should just move it to right side

ripe flax
#

u should subtract both sides by 3

#

so only x would be in the left hand side

ripe flax
agile cypress
#

why cant i divide it?

ripe flax
#

remember only divide when is more than 1 x involved

acoustic leaf
#

you have to think about what operation you are undoing

  • subtraction is the opposite of addition, so to cancel out an addition you have to subtract
  • division is the opposite of multiplication, so to cancel out a multiplication you have to divide
lost shale
#

cuz the 3 is pos, it would switch to -3

#
  • will become - - will become +
    x will become / / will become x
agile cypress
#

okay ty

lost shale
#

what grade in?

#

just asken

agile cypress
#

im not on school anymore

lost shale
#

....

#

r u trollen?

agile cypress
#

i stopped studying math after grade 9

#

nahh

lost shale
#

ok

#

u can close it now

agile cypress
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @agile cypress

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

shut yarrow
agile cypress
#

.reopen

devout snowBOT
#

agile cypress
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @agile cypress

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wise scarab
#

So, I was scrolling back to the start of my ODE book to re-read some content I glossed over since my class switched books

wise scarab
#

and I was wondering if anyone knew what it means for $\phi_0=Id$ and what that circle operator between $\phi_t$ and $\phi_s$ means

woven radishBOT
#

00100000

wise scarab
#

is it like, some sort of convolution?

#

ah, it should be $\varphi$ whoops.

woven radishBOT
#

00100000

sullen island
#

each phi_t is a function itself

#

Id is the identity function, the function that does nothing to its input

wise scarab
#

wait... does Id mean it's an identity?

#

ohhhh

sullen island
#

and circ is composition

wise scarab
#

ok I just realized that lmao

wise scarab
#

that makes a lot of sense

#

thanks!

#

I feel like usually, the smaller circles are used for composition lol

#

I thought the bigger circle was something different

#

I guess now my follow-up question is, is there any more intuitive way of understanding what a "flow" is meant to signify? I have very very little physics experience, so I have absolutely no intuition for any of these things that sort of seem like they come from physics

#

hmmm... maybe I need to think in linear algebra terms to get some intuition. is there a nice easy matrix that's a flow?

#

well uhhhhh

#

the matrix $\phi_0$ would ofc have to be the identity matrix

woven radishBOT
#

00100000

wise scarab
#

but the weird property of... $\phi_{t+s}=\phi_t \circ \phi_s$

#

how would one make that work in a matrix......

woven radishBOT
#

00100000

wise scarab
#

idt the matrix where $a_{ij}=t$ when $i=j$ and 0 otherwise works lol

woven radishBOT
#

00100000

sullen island
#

well typically the flows you look at in DEs essentially involve all possible trajectories of the DE

#

and phi_t essentially means "run this DE for t seconds"

wise scarab
#

OH WAIT IM AN IDIOT the textbook has an immediate example 💀

#

I'm gonna read that

#

thanks for the help!

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wise scarab

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

arctic pulsar
#

my eyes hurt hel

devout snowBOT
arctic pulsar
#

ik they need to have the same intercepted arc to be equal but theres to much angles i cant rlly tell

#

also im lost in the stone world like senkuu on this one

ripe flax
#

do u know the basic circle theorems

arctic pulsar
ripe flax
#

do u wanna do the second one first

arctic pulsar
ripe flax
#

looks a bit easier

arctic pulsar
#

oh

#

Yeahxd

ripe flax
#

ok

#

AC and AD are tangents to the circle

#

whlile CO and DO are the radiuses

arctic pulsar
#

ye

ripe flax
#

there is one theorem involving them

#

which is?

#

this ones prob the easiest to remember

arctic pulsar
#

oh

ripe flax
#

ok write this down then

#

if a point involves a tangent and a radius, the angle is always 90 degrees

#

in this case C and D are connected to tangents and radiuses as well

#

so their angle should be 90 degrees

#

correct?

arctic pulsar
#

yes

ripe flax
#

ok

#

now look at quadrilateral ACOD

#

it looks like a kite cuz it is

arctic pulsar
ripe flax
#

recall that angles in a quadrilateral add up to 360

#

but angle c and angle d are taken with 90 for each

#

so would it be safe to assume that angle a and angle o add up to 180

arctic pulsar
#

yes

ripe flax
#

lets name angle a x and angle o y

#

cuz we’re gonna do some stuff to it

arctic pulsar
#

ok

ripe flax
#

now look at quadrilateral BCOD

#

it forms a rhombus, doesnt it

arctic pulsar
#

yes

ripe flax
#

so angle o (which we called y) should be equal to angle b

#

ok not sure if you’ve heard this before

#

but an angle at the centre is twice the angle at the circumference

#

aka the reflex angle o and the normal angle b

arctic pulsar
#

yea i dont know that

ripe flax
#

since angle o is y

#

would it make sense for the reflex angle part of o to be 360-y

#

and since the normal angle b is at the circumeference

#

the circle theorem states the reflex angle seen is twice the normal angle b

#

“ an angle at the centre is twice the angle at the circumference”

#

so, we generate an equation for y.

#

360-y (the reflex angle o) = 2y (angle b, which we previously proved b=o hence the y)

#

arrange the y terms to one side

#

then we have 3y=360

#

y=120 which is your normal angle o

#

that should be your answer

devout snowBOT
#

@arctic pulsar Has your question been resolved?

arctic pulsar
devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @arctic pulsar

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

young sedge
#

I have a question regarding this task, I am supposed to solve it using partial integration but I just loop around between this and cos(nx)cos(mx)

For the first one that is

devout snowBOT
#

Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.

young sedge
#

I end up with this, which if I partially integrate it again I just end up with the starting term again…

lunar harbor
#

missing chain rule here

#

but do ibp on this again - You should notice something

#

Also, you're missing your dx, so fix that

young sedge
#

okay

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @young sedge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

median patio
devout snowBOT
median patio
#

i got x=2 and x=4 but how to find the last one

drifting mauve
versed vault
#

It’s a calculator question

#

Just use your graphing calculator

median patio
#

is there no way to solve it manually

versed vault
#

why would you lol

visual hazel
versed vault
#

You have a calculator

median patio
#

well i have a test tmrw

drifting mauve
#

yeah just use a calculator

median patio
#

and she kinda hinted at

#

this kind of question

drifting mauve
#

too much of a hassle to do it by hand

versed vault
#

New ap exam wouldn’t ever ask

#

Cords of intersection

#

It’s a purely algebraic question

#

So they wouldn’t ask it

#

It’s the same reason why you don’t have to simplify 1+1 on the exam

#

It’s an non-calculus question

median patio
#

oh

versed vault
#

You might have to find the x values for bounds, but that would be it

#

Not to say a teacher wouldn’t put it on an exam

#

But for the actual exam

#

They don’t ask anything too algebraically intensive

median patio
#

ty

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @median patio

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hexed holly
#

What formula does my teacher use to get this answer?

distant helm
#

Be sure to pay more attention to the lesson

fierce relic
#

Root 1 = (-b+rootD)/2a
Root 2 = (-b - rootD)/2a
D = b^2 - 4ac = 0 (in this case)
So Root(1) = Root(2) = -b/2a

hexed holly
#

thanks

fierce relic
#

thou art welcome

hexed holly
#

wait im still confused

#

what does it mean

hexed holly
thorn cypress
#

yes

hexed holly
#

are we solving it

thorn cypress
#

if you have a quadratic of the form $ax^2 + bx + c$, the discriminant is $b^2 - 4ac$ (it's the part of the quadratic formula that is square rooted)

woven radishBOT
#

AMysteriousStranger

hexed holly
#

oh okay

#

like in here?

thorn cypress
#

yes

#

and bc it is square rooted, if it is >0 there are 2 distinct real roots

hexed holly
#

how does using the discriminant only solve it

thorn cypress
#

if it is =0 there is a repeated real root

#

and if it is <0 there are no real roots

thorn cypress
hexed holly
#

why do i need that to find a solution

thorn cypress
hexed holly
#

oh okay

#

how do i know for future how many it will have at each number

thorn cypress
#

if the discriminant is <0, there are no real roots, if it =0, there is a repeated real root, and if it is >0 then there are 2

hexed holly
#

is there only 1 real root at 0? or infinite?

thorn cypress
#

there is one real root, the discriminant would be zero if the quadratic was something like $(x+1)^2$

#

so x would just equal -1

woven radishBOT
#

AMysteriousStranger

hexed holly
#

okay!

#

thank you so much!!

thorn cypress
#

np

hexed holly
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hexed holly

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wispy geyser
#

did i do everything right here

devout snowBOT
wispy geyser
#

for the answer would it be squared?

fierce relic
#

What is "in"?

wispy geyser
#

heres the question if u need it im on part c

wispy geyser
#

inches

fierce relic
#

Of course, it will be A square inches or A inch^2

glossy dew
#

you could've done half of base * height to get a perfect 32

#

since it's a right triangle

#

but this is ok too i guess

wispy geyser
#

im jus following a vid my teacher sent and she did exactly this

fierce relic
#

Yeah, and it's pretty easy to identify it as a right angled triangle

glossy dew
wispy geyser
#

okay got it

fierce relic
#

I think 31.91 inch^2 is incorrect

wispy geyser
#

omg

fierce relic
#

the correct answer is 32

wispy geyser
#

😭

glossy dew
fierce relic
#

no

#

the actual answer is not a decimal, so the decimal here is wrong

glossy dew
#

i mean

#

that's alright

wispy geyser
#

i was copying this

glossy dew
#

it's difficult when you are forced to use herons formula

#

and not the easy way

glossy dew
#

spot on

devout snowBOT
#

@wispy geyser Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

inner ibex
devout snowBOT
inner ibex
#

is j or k the one going up

ripe flax
#

k

#

goes up

river pebble
#

why is organic chem tutor tripping

ripe flax
#

its related to z

river pebble
#

cuz this is not right lol

inner ibex
#

oh ok

#

thankss guys

#

is this right

#

this is kind of confusing

#

why is it 3d now

#

does AB = 0B - OA

#

still apply

#

when its 3d

glossy dew