#help-27
1 messages · Page 327 of 1
(-infinity , 0]
So the brackets () mean the value is not included and [] means the value is included
0 is included and -infinity is excluded
you never include infinity as they aren't really numbers, but just an idea
that applies to negative infinity as well
well -infinity is a number that keep increasing in -ve side
Exactly
That is why we don't include it
We don't know what that is
So did you understand how to find domain and range
but our function is giving negative values for any -ve no. We should do [-infinity, 0]
can't
the reason being is we can't tell its value?
Uh yes
can we write that interval as [0 , -infinity)
-infinity just tells us that the value keeps going more negative
So basically
Do u know the number line
yup
THat is ok but number line
In number line it's NEGATIVE then ZERO then POSITIVE
- values , 0 +values
Hence negative to 0 then 0 to positive
Yes
That is why I wrote (-infinity,0]
It goes according to the number line
But if you want to write it the other way you can
got it
Ok so try 2nd question
so domain is all the input values to define f(X) and range is set of values of input from domain
Yes range is output you get by inputting values from domain
let me work 2nd
k
negative root
is that defined
no
no its not
Then tell me domain
domain = {x : -3 <= x <= 3}
range = [3,3]
both are same thing
ig
well
i got it
domain = 0
range = 0
Ok domain is [-3,3]
is this correct domain = {x : -3 <= x <= 3}
You can write it as [-3,3]
ok tell me what number you enter
to get -3
Don't use {} btw they represent a single element
not possible
Then why do you include that
it is possible for x because x^2 = (-3)^2 = 0
devthemasked
What x will you enter
Yes so how did you get -3 as output
we can't get
Yea then what is your range
[0, 3]
domain = [-3,3]
range = [0,3]
Ok
that is indeed
What problem did mathematicians trying to solve that they had to invent functions?
I don't know
fine
what is the meaning of this f(x) = {x, x>=0 , -x, x < 0 in modulus function
@lime plaza
Ok so
Modulus opens with a sign
Modulus has to be always positive
Hence when |x| x is positive that means |x| is same as x
But in |x| if x is negative then it would be |-x| but modulus is always positive
So it opens with a negative sign
|-x| will be -(-x)
so |-3| = -3?
no
|-3|= -(-3)
Modulus always positive
If number inside is negative it needs to make it positive
from where the extra - come?
Modulus opens with a negative sign
That is why it says -x when x<0
Modulus can open with a + or with a - it depends on the number inside
so if f(-5) = |-5| = 5?
f(-x) = |-x| = -(-x)
Yes
i didn't understand why the extra -ve sign
Do you know that modulus range is positive?
no
and modulus domain is real number?
f(2) = 2
Both are same
Modulus is always positive
So if number is negative we multiply with a - to make it positive
it means it range is [0, infinity)
that was bracket mistake
{} means a single element
yeah
Ok so u understood or
It's graph is a slope
Like
Straight lines*
Draw 2 symmetric straight lines from 0
at angle 45
Or I will show
yes
@normal bolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @normal bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What does this highlighted box part want to mean? I can't see the things on the fig 12.1 as mentioned in text.
basically i want someone to explain read box text
for the first one
what is this from
its basically explaining how to get a gradient from a curve
from my textbook
so yeah u could basically draw a tangent line to a specific point and that would be it
but it wont be that exact would it
why is there physics here lol
so we start by drawing something we know is exact first, a line intersecting the curve twice
its not the same as the tangent line
but move the points of intersection closer together
does it look like a bit more like the tangent line
so just do that and that and that
intersection of that chord?
yes
just move one of the points closer and closer to the point u want
but we want to be exact we’re mathematicians
lemme draw a graph hold on
yes please, i wanna understand everything basically or fundamentally
say a simple graph y=x^2
if you have zero calculus fundamentals, you might wanna watch the 3b1b series on it
parabola
u have 2 points u can intersect with a line easily
how?
in (x,x^2) where is x^2
it dont look like a tangent line yet but we will make it look like one
something like this
because y=x^2
sub y in for x^2, so (x,y) becomes (x,x^2)
oh
and h is the distance on x-axis from fpoint x?
h is the distance from the point u want to any point u place on the graph
ok
h could be 100 or 0.4 and we would still have the same, if ur original point is fixed
any real number on x-axis?
heres a cool thing we can do to make this line a tangent line tho
theoretically yes but lets make h positive for now
the secant line?
yes
okay
do you know limits?
move the second point along the parabola curve to the first point?
and the approximation for the tangent line is better
but we could do better
we could make h closer and closer and closer
so close that there is so little distance between them
like 0.000000000001
but we disregard that, since its so small its not gonna change shit
that is approximately 0 by rounding off?
yes
so as h approaches 0
so the point is moving towards the original point
it slowly becomes more of a tangent line
h is going toward 0 distnace or reaching to 0 distance constantly??
therefore we can find the gradient as h approaches to 0
reaching
it never gets to 0, otherwise the 2 points overlap
and we cant get a line from that
but can u see that
if h is so small so small
we can disregard that value altogether
cuz its ultimately not gonna make a difference
what does it mean
essentially the gap is there but we dont care
we can round it off to 0
do we round off actually?
so in proper notation we would do something like this
this might sound wishy washy but dont let that dissaude you
nah, we have good rigor for it
it's called the epsilon-delta definiton of limits, and it's a nightmare to use lmao, but yeah the rigor exists
lim h->0 means as h gets so close to 0 that we could just say its 0 we dont care
the right hand side is just the gradient function
(x+h)^2 -x^2 is just the rise
h is the run
rise/run
wait let me absorb this 2 min and ask you doubt if i get
okay slight nitpicky connection here, we'd never say it's 'basically zero we don't care', we say it's an infinitesimal, and we still have to deal with the infinitesimal
just remember that
fair nitpick
pitfall prevention
just not sure everyone can grasp the idea of infinity thats all
what do you mean by gradient function?
the slope.
they're british, presumably
gradient means slope
mfw to call the slope the gradient so i sound like i know multivariable calculus 😔
how do you write 2nd point coordinate?
it's $\left(x+h, f(x+h)\right)$
if the x distance between the 2 points is h, if one point is x, would it make sense for the other point to be x+h
Percy
whoopsie daisy
essentially yes
funny thing most of the time we use y instead of f(x)
well it's f(x+h) in the definition sooo
and y axis is (X+h)^2 why
because recall that f(x) = x^2
the function is $f(x)=x^2$ no?
Percy
okay ill stick to nitpicks here i like how you're dealing with the derivatives 101 class llol /gen
for the first point its (x,x^2) just sub y in
for the second point however, its (x+h, and something else
that something, is because y=x^2, would it make sense to the y value to be y=(x+h)^2
im just adding some value to the x
got it
nice
when we say h -> 0 do we mean the distance of h is changing towards 0 or is it going towards (0,0) which is origin
the distance of h is changing towards 0
but it makes sense that h can't approach (0,0) but any point on parabola can
heres the thing
we dc about the origin
because say f(x)=x^2 and g(x) = x^2 +1
they look the same but g(x) does not pass thru the origin
why g(x) does not pass thru the origin
recall that the origin is (0,0)
if you substitute x=0 to g(x), (0)^2+1 =1
the y value does not equal 0
therefore it does not intersect the origin
so yeah not every parabola crosses the origin
how does it changes by only adding +1
by adding 1 to f(x)
can u see every y value has shifted by 1
so say a point is (2,4)
now its transformed to (2,5)
because we added a 1 on top
will that limit concept work with f(x) = x^3 too?
What might it feel like to invent calculus?
Help fund future projects: https://www.patreon.com/3blue1brown
An equally valuable form of support is to share the videos.
Special thanks to these supporters: http://3b1b.co/lessons/essence-of-calculus#thanks
In this first video of the series, we see how unraveling the nuances of a simple geometry que...
but u need to evaluate the limit first
please
on the right we have say like ((x+h)^2 -x^2) all over a measly little h
we know that h is basically 0
but we cant divide by 0
then?
so we try to expand the numerator first see if we can factorise anything
In fancy terms $\frac{d}{dx} f(c) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(c+h) - f(c)}{h}$, which is the (kinda) formal definition of the derivative.
yes
Percy
ah close enough
major whoopsie daisy but we're so back
infinitely small more like
expand the numerator out u get x^2 +2xh + h^2 -x^2
do u see anything nice
the x^2s cancel each other
so we’re left with 2xh + h^2 left
since the denominator is an h
yes it's actually $\lim_{h \to \lim_{c \to \infty} \left(\frac{1}{c}\right)}$ lmao
Percy
ill leave now
@ripe flax explain me the x^3 thing
would it be sensible to substitute as h=0
i’ll send a pic hold on
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
hope this helps a bit
is that l'hospital is also limit rule?
tbh i havent learnt hospital yet
i also didn't
i learn it in 5 months time cuz my curriculum is scuffed
i learned all of basic integration before hospital lol
is this called fundamental theorm of calculus?
its called differentiation from first principles in my country
idk about urs
but yes its the first thing u learn in calculus
f(x) = x^2 takes very close values to 0 and f(x) = x^2 =+ 1 does not?
not this ss but you got it
ok i close this
ok
Closed by @normal bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
no
,tex .FTC1
ℝαμOmeganato5
,tex .FTC2
ℝαμOmeganato5
ftc is about integrals from riemann sums and limits of antiderivatives
is this ftc?
i think its more like leibniz
isn't ftc 2 $\frac{d}{dx} \int^x_a f(t) dt = f(x)$
Percy
like the simple version
yeh, the one above is more general
are these general factoid commands?
custom, from riemann and snow
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
broooooooooooooooooooo
i have a big doubt
ok
very good
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
@pale thistle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is this question asking?
are we attempting to show equivalence between the two statements?
the whole thing is one statement
can I clarify what the tribar means in context
as in what would we want to show (it's a T/F q)
if that helps you
I know what it means, it's not like I need clarification
sorry I guess I wasn't clear I was asking what it means in this context
lol
it's equivalence/congruence modulo 2
so do you apply modulo 2 to both 17 and 5 and check if they are equal?
$a\equiv b \mod n$ means $a-b = kn, k\in \bZ$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
if by "applying modulo 2" you mean computing the remainder of division by 2
sure
otherwise
computing a-b and seeing if it's a multiple of 2 doesn't hurt
Closed by @solid hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Limit $\lim_{x\to\a} f(x^2)$
cleavemelons
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
um sorry I don't really know how to use latex
anyhow I don't understand the general epsilon delta proof of the limit of x² when x aproaches a
martingale
yes thanks
yes
or do just mean $\lim_{x\to a} x^2$
martingale
let $\epsilon > 0 $
find $$\delta > 0$$ such that $$|x- a| < \delta \implies |x^2 - a^2| < \epsilon $$
martingale
without a right zo biger than a
ok what part of the proof do u not understand
?
at a certain point you get |x-a| * |x+a| and then you try to find some value so you can solve it and that part I don't understand
|x-a| * |x+a| <= |x-a| *( |x-a| + 2|a| )
||x|-|a|| les than or eaqual to |x-a| les than 1
that's not how my reacher did it but I'm not sure
he reasons that |x-a| must me les than 1 at some point
do u agree this true for all x
remember a is fixed
I don't know
this is a choice btw it doesn't have to be <1
I know
so no
no than
I haven o idea what that is
triangle inequality?
he arives at 2|a| -1 < |x| < 2|a|+1
oh yes he did use that
ok let's forget about him for a sec
ok
do dat here
u get this
|x-a| * |x+a| <= |x-a| *( |x-a| + 2|a| )
now we pick delta
but how is this the same
p = x-a, q = 2a
ah
yes
ru sure
um not really
yes about the previous step I'm sure
ok do u agree with this
yes
|x-a| + |2a|
yes
wich is eqaual to just |x-a|+ 2|a|
so |x+a| <= |x-a|+ 2|a|
so
|x^2 - a^2| = |x-a| * |x+a| <= |x-a| *( |x-a| + 2|a| )
you just replace x+a with this
ok I think I get it
i bound it above yes
so |x^2 - a^2| <= |x-a| *( |x-a| + 2|a| ) for all x
yes but not when x = a right?
oh then why do you need to exempt a from your base region
yes
here it works at x=a because x^2 is continous but in general it won't
regardless of definition
it's just a fact that
|x^2 - a^2| <= |x-a| *( |x-a| + 2|a| ) for all x
ok
but if x is such that |x - a| < 1, i.e. x in the interval (a-1, a+1),
|x^2 - a^2| <= |x-a| * (1 + 2|a|)
mb
basically use |x - a| < 1 in the second |x-a|
like if
|x - a| < 1 then
|x - a| + 2|a| < 1 + 2|a|
yes?
yes
ok multiply |x-a| on both sides
u get this
that's the same no?
same as what
u gotta think abt for a bit
I meaen this step didn't heppan right?
happen*
if you got |x²-a²| <= |x-a| *(1+2|a|) and you multiplie both sides by |x-a|
how can you get |x²-a²| <= |x-a| *(1+2|a|) again
i meant multplity that here
what?
what hwat
I don't understand what you mean
with this
and this
bruh ok
if |x - a| < 1 then
|x - a| + 2|a| < 1 + 2|a| so
|x - a| * (|x - a| + 2|a|) < |x - a| * (1 + 2|a|)
I'm sorry I don't understand
and where comes p from
gtg good luck
@primal hollow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @primal hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I saw this question earlier but I don’t understand the methodology. How do you divide by x^2 while it runs from 0 to 1?
goddamn it
@lime plaza sorry for the ping, u did this earlier, can u help me if possible?
Ye I tried too but the nominator isn’t relevant ..
Divide it by x^2
But it runs from 0
Who posted this question earlier
personally i’d factorise x^4 -1 into something like (x^2+1)^2 - 2x^2
U can’t divide by 0 can u
then u can cancel one of the x^2 +1s
forget that there are limits
||its not x^4 -1||
then do partial from there
thats why i included the -2x^2
guys i think im failing maths
if it were x^4 -1 i’d say (x^2+1)(x^2-1)
ah , i didnt see , srry
you can use the beta function
so yea just do partial fractions for 1/(1+x)(1-x)
So @fast rose
Forget there is a integratino from 0 1
divide by x^2 and take x-(1/x) as t
You can get answer in 4 steps
Why do you want to complicate
and u know what i is: e^pi/2
idk
Don't
😭
That’s my point how do you divide by x when it runs from x=0
Even when u got it all
I just told you
(1+1/x²)dx=dy
then change the limits of the integrals
i thought we use u for sub
you can use anything
the last integral can be solved easly
this is the final result
shit repeats every pi dont it
there is an other way to solve this integral
by using the Beta function for Euler
but no need
@fast rose i hope that i helped you 👍
Closed by @fast rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the least multiple of 2016 whose sum of digits is 2016 ?
and what's your upper bound then
which was 225 digit number all 9s except last 4 which would be 8496
so (221 9's)8496
let's see
999999 is divisible by 3^2 and 7
so we can move a low digit up by six spots without affecting either digit sum or divisibility as long as we do not touch the last two digits
this improves the upper bound somewhat but does not give much info as to whether we can do even better...
@sweet ridge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sweet ridge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sweet ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for $||r||^2$
allarkvarkk
allarkvarkk
like it doesnt have the sub 1 2 or infinity so idk which to do
does that just mean magnitude?
@digital egret Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @digital egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what about it ?
Is the answer to 1b (1+p)/6 or (4-p)/3 or are they both wrong?
the answer doesn't depend on p
Ok
@fading hollow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given AB = BA , A and B both orthoonally diagonalizable, Proof AB is also orthogonally diagonalizable, $(AB)^T = (Q_A^TD_AQ_AQ_B^TD_BQ_D)^T=(Q_B^TD_B^TQ_BQ_A^TD_A^TQ_A)=Q_B^TDQ_BQ_A^TD_AQ_A= BA = AB$
So $(AB)^T=AB$, AB is symmetrical so AB is orthogonal diagonalizable
Brett
@umbral torrent Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@umbral torrent yes
Closed by @umbral torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
firstly we can see a log graph
do u know what the generic log graph is shaped like
ok
lets find the asymptotes of a log base 9 x graph first
before doing it with the a and stuff
would u agree that x cannot be 0
now lets add an “a” inside the function
if an a is added inside the function, the whole graph moves left by “a” spaces
so essentially, the vertical asymptote(x=0) is now changed to x=-a
there is a new x intercept as well
if x=1, y=0
that is the x intercept
now move it left a units
then u get the new x intercept (1-a,0)
there is also a y intercept
we gotta make x=0 for it to work
y=log9 (a)
so y is log9 of a
new y intercept (0,log9 a)
so the newly transformed graph has equation y=log9 (x+a), with asymptotes x=-a, x intercepts(1-a,0) and y intercept (0,log9 a)
@fossil trout Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im lost on q18
Closed by @ripe grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is there a 1/n Infront of the stigma?
*sigma
just a definition
Oh my bad
it makes the definition independent of the number of data points
my german is far from perfect, but it seems to be a formula for variance. What the formula does is that it calculates how far each of those points is from the mean and squares it (that's the (x-xmean)^2 part) and then takes the average of all those
and to calculate the average, you need to sum them all up and then divide it by the number of them
Ohhh, so is it like calculating the average, and dividing it by the amount of numbers I put in?
so it's basically the average square of distance between the mean and the data points
yep
it's averaging (x-x̄)^2
for all x
Closed by @sterile musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i avoid making mistake here
if u wanna avoid doing that again,
why cant i divide it?
remember only divide when is more than 1 x involved
you have to think about what operation you are undoing
- subtraction is the opposite of addition, so to cancel out an addition you have to subtract
- division is the opposite of multiplication, so to cancel out a multiplication you have to divide
cuz the 3 is pos, it would switch to -3
- will become - - will become +
x will become / / will become x
okay ty
im not on school anymore
.close
Closed by @agile cypress
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
W
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @agile cypress
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, I was scrolling back to the start of my ODE book to re-read some content I glossed over since my class switched books
and I was wondering if anyone knew what it means for $\phi_0=Id$ and what that circle operator between $\phi_t$ and $\phi_s$ means
00100000
00100000
each phi_t is a function itself
Id is the identity function, the function that does nothing to its input
and circ is composition
ok I just realized that lmao
oh, I feel so foolish for not realizing that
that makes a lot of sense
thanks!
I feel like usually, the smaller circles are used for composition lol
I thought the bigger circle was something different
I guess now my follow-up question is, is there any more intuitive way of understanding what a "flow" is meant to signify? I have very very little physics experience, so I have absolutely no intuition for any of these things that sort of seem like they come from physics
hmmm... maybe I need to think in linear algebra terms to get some intuition. is there a nice easy matrix that's a flow?
well uhhhhh
the matrix $\phi_0$ would ofc have to be the identity matrix
00100000
but the weird property of... $\phi_{t+s}=\phi_t \circ \phi_s$
how would one make that work in a matrix......
00100000
idt the matrix where $a_{ij}=t$ when $i=j$ and 0 otherwise works lol
00100000
well typically the flows you look at in DEs essentially involve all possible trajectories of the DE
and phi_t essentially means "run this DE for t seconds"
OH WAIT IM AN IDIOT the textbook has an immediate example 💀
I'm gonna read that
thanks for the help!
.close
Closed by @wise scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
my eyes hurt hel
ik they need to have the same intercepted arc to be equal but theres to much angles i cant rlly tell
also im lost in the stone world like senkuu on this one
do u know the basic circle theorems
i mean some yeah but its hard to memorize them all
do u wanna do the second one first
also i finshed this one
looks a bit easier
ye
there is one theorem involving them
which is?
this ones prob the easiest to remember
ok write this down then
if a point involves a tangent and a radius, the angle is always 90 degrees
in this case C and D are connected to tangents and radiuses as well
so their angle should be 90 degrees
correct?
yes

recall that angles in a quadrilateral add up to 360
but angle c and angle d are taken with 90 for each
so would it be safe to assume that angle a and angle o add up to 180
yes
ok
yes
so angle o (which we called y) should be equal to angle b
ok not sure if you’ve heard this before
but an angle at the centre is twice the angle at the circumference
aka the reflex angle o and the normal angle b
yea i dont know that
since angle o is y
would it make sense for the reflex angle part of o to be 360-y
and since the normal angle b is at the circumeference
the circle theorem states the reflex angle seen is twice the normal angle b
“ an angle at the centre is twice the angle at the circumference”
so, we generate an equation for y.
360-y (the reflex angle o) = 2y (angle b, which we previously proved b=o hence the y)
arrange the y terms to one side
then we have 3y=360
y=120 which is your normal angle o
that should be your answer
@arctic pulsar Has your question been resolved?
its right thanks
Closed by @arctic pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a question regarding this task, I am supposed to solve it using partial integration but I just loop around between this and cos(nx)cos(mx)
For the first one that is
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
I end up with this, which if I partially integrate it again I just end up with the starting term again…
missing chain rule here
but do ibp on this again - You should notice something
Also, you're missing your dx, so fix that
Closed by @young sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got x=2 and x=4 but how to find the last one
feels very like lambert function-esque
is there no way to solve it manually
why would you lol
numerical methods
You have a calculator
well i have a test tmrw
yeah just use a calculator
too much of a hassle to do it by hand
New ap exam wouldn’t ever ask
Cords of intersection
It’s a purely algebraic question
So they wouldn’t ask it
It’s the same reason why you don’t have to simplify 1+1 on the exam
It’s an non-calculus question
oh
You might have to find the x values for bounds, but that would be it
Not to say a teacher wouldn’t put it on an exam
But for the actual exam
They don’t ask anything too algebraically intensive
Closed by @median patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What formula does my teacher use to get this answer?
In mathematics, a quadratic equation (from Latin quadratus 'square') is an equation that can be rearranged in standard form as
a
x
2
+
b
x
+
c
=
0
,
{\displaystyle ax^{2}+...
Be sure to pay more attention to the lesson
Root 1 = (-b+rootD)/2a
Root 2 = (-b - rootD)/2a
D = b^2 - 4ac = 0 (in this case)
So Root(1) = Root(2) = -b/2a
thanks
thou art welcome
this is a quadratic right?
yes
are we solving it
if you have a quadratic of the form $ax^2 + bx + c$, the discriminant is $b^2 - 4ac$ (it's the part of the quadratic formula that is square rooted)
AMysteriousStranger
how does using the discriminant only solve it
it doesnt solve it, it just tells you how many real roots there are
why do i need that to find a solution
your question here just says determine how many solutions, not what the solutions actually are
if the discriminant is <0, there are no real roots, if it =0, there is a repeated real root, and if it is >0 then there are 2
is there only 1 real root at 0? or infinite?
there is one real root, the discriminant would be zero if the quadratic was something like $(x+1)^2$
so x would just equal -1
AMysteriousStranger
np
.close
Closed by @hexed holly
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
did i do everything right here
for the answer would it be squared?
What is "in"?
heres the question if u need it im on part c
Of course, it will be A square inches or A inch^2
you could've done half of base * height to get a perfect 32
since it's a right triangle
but this is ok too i guess
yeah i see what u mean
im jus following a vid my teacher sent and she did exactly this
Yeah, and it's pretty easy to identify it as a right angled triangle
yes, squared inches
okay got it
I think 31.91 inch^2 is incorrect
omg
the correct answer is 32
😭
close enough
i was copying this
true yea
@wispy geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is j or k the one going up
why is organic chem tutor tripping
its related to z
cuz this is not right lol
oh ok
thankss guys
is this right
for 2
this is kind of confusing
why is it 3d now

does AB = 0B - OA
still apply
when its 3d
it is