#help-27
1 messages · Page 322 of 1
Well, I'm still in 9th grade 😅 so I'm unable to understand the rigourous proof, could you explain it in simple terms, or would the essense of the proof be lost?
basically
for a set of observations
we take the mean
and try bounding it
I still have a vauge understanding, I will take some time to further research and understand the proof.
Thanks for taking the time anyways!
.close
Closed by @trim shoal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no
Closed by @wise scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is x 3 and not 8
It should be 8
so its an issue with the book?
I guess
alr then ty
@tropic tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
because that statement is not true
this is not how logs work
log(ab) = log(a) + log(b)
log of a product is the sum of the logarithms
no
Closed by @ruby island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did you forget an x? +8x?
So first divide
so guess a number
take like 1, -1 ,2 ,-2
Just put x= that number and see if it comes out to be 0
I don't see any
I normally solve by getting a factor
Like if we get 0 by putting x=1 then we can tell (x-1) is a factor of that polynomial
So we divide that by x-1 but here it is not happening
ugh
did you forget an = sign somewhere
I think yeah
They are missing a -ve sign
Hey what brings a mod here? hayley?
hmm
wait what
what is the question
find value of x??
....
!original
btw @modern pulsar step 0 is to not DM individual helpers asking for help.
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
did he dm
he tried to DM me yes
you can and should post pictures
instead of this bad copypaste that triples all math notation for no reason
What is this
If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway!
this is just plugging in x = -2 then do arithmetic
Closed by @modern pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@modern pulsar if you delete I am not gonna help you again
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I'd like to know if my factorization is correct. I need to create a sign table afterward. If the factorization is correct, should I then isolate the two x values to construct my sign table?
the answer is correct, but you left out a + in the middle step.
Between (2x + 1) and (3x - 4) ?
yes
you made it look like they were multiplied, but you don't want that
aside from this typo your work is correct so far
Closed by @tiny nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have this exercise and made output plots of e_n, but beyond that im not sure how else to talk about it. could anyone help me understand what that function does?
@fierce rune Has your question been resolved?
maybe compute some x_n n from 1 to say 6-7. Do you recognize a well know sequence F_n? Also it might be useful I think to explicitely compute alpha
yeah its the fibonacci sequence, its largest eigenvalue is the golden ratio. i'm just not sure what e_n could represent.
i can see that the numerator is 0 for any eigenvector x_n, but im not sure what else there is beyond that
<@&286206848099549185>
one interpretation I can see for e_n is that it is the multiplicative factor by which the linear map (A - alpha I) stretch the iterates x_n
could you send the plot of the iterates?
hum for n greater than 90 it does nonsense
I feel like this is numerical rounding error too
so tentatively the stretching factor of the iterates by the map A -alpha I tends towards 0
so up to 90 that's what youd expect?
but I feel there is a better interpretation and this is a linear algebra and numerical analysis skill issue on my part
its a computing class so theres no study of linear algebra beyond like what eigenvectors are
i dont think theyd expect any pure analysis
ohh so its a way of approximating fibonacci numbers? because then $A^N x_n \approx \alpha^N x_n$
just not true
im lost
x_n seems to converge to the eigenvector associated wit alpha
ahhh
and yeah I guess this kinda implies when n is big you can approximate x_n+m by alpha^(n+m) x_n
so you can kinda deduce the asymtotic growth of x_n
it's a bit handwavey
wait but x_n =[F_n-1, F_n] which grows
how do you mean it converges?
or just converges to be an eigenvector
ic
okay i can totally squeeze 300 words out of this
thanks so much!
.close
Closed by @fierce rune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, I proved (see attachments):
P1. P(B | A ) > P(B | ¬A )
P2. P(C | B ) > P(C | ¬B )
P3. P(C | AB) = P(C | B) & P(C | A¬B) = P(C | ¬B)
C. P(C | A) > P(C | ¬A)
However, now I want to prove the following and am having a much harder time with it. Anyone any ideas?
P1. P(B | A ) > P(B | ¬A )
P2. P(C | B ) > P(C | ¬B )
P3.* P(C | AB) > P(C | B) & P(C | A¬B) = P(C | ¬B)
C. P(C | A) > P(C | ¬A)
@sterile ivy Has your question been resolved?
<@&268886789983436800> (I experience this question as inappropriate)
<@&286206848099549185> anyone familiar enough with logic and probability theory to be able to help me?
How is this inappropriate exactly
I don’t think this constitutes a mod ping, it’s just asking you
funny there is no defination of inappropriate
With so little context it's not obvious if they meant anything bad by it.
Unless there are dms but 
That would count as extra context
also
dp literally means display picture, meant to display
Mhm, door
If there is more relevant context definitely share it of course
Fair enough probably just a miscommunication
We should probably let them focus the channel on their question.
It would be good to try and resolve issues between each other before pinging mods though for what it is worth.
@sterile ivy Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> anyone here with knowledge of probability theory/logic? Curious to hear your thoughts!!
This same should work out
just make sure you put a less then sign here
@sterile ivy Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Linear Algebra problem here, I googled the det(A) and it was -72. What is wrong with how I solved it and how does on get -72?
the last matrix should be 5,8
3,6
it's not the row you highlighted
omg thank you
.stop
.ealve
.leave
leave
how the hell do i get out
Closed by @sand dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m not sure how to do this
hint connect A and D
yup
That’s I all get
do you remember the properties of cyclic quadrilaterals?
yup
😄😄omg ty sm
yw
.close
Closed by @worthy loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In a linear expression, is it possible to cancel out more than one time on the same numerator, example below
no you have to take away equal amounts from top and bottom
you crossed off two 2m-n's from the top and one from below, which is wrong
I'm saying you can only cross off one from the top, and the reason this stuff works is (2m-n)/(2m-n)=1 so you can hide them from the fraction
Closed by @nocturne turtle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am trying to graph this butterfly shape thing around the outer ring of this. how should I make a graph of that? I've been messing with desmos a bit and (cos(t),sin(2t)) was the closest I could get to the shape I wanted
would I be better off piecing together a bunch of functions until I get the shape I want?
I should just use AI for stupid questions like this
I got my function
.close
Closed by @nova forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
select odd functions help
no
Which one looks like same thing but flipped over x axis
Same thing
no
As what i said ye
Wtf
are you sure?
no
Then flip x
so like
Is same?
if you don’t know what it is please don’t confuse the person who has asked the question
😤
odd functions are symmetric across the origin, or more strictly f(-x) = -f(x)
i'm pretty sure this is correct
Yes
But dont try it yourself
which one
idk how to tell
like
ik flipped
acros the orgion
but when i do tht
Draw line y=x
it says its wrong
Turn head
Does it look like mirror image
they all looked mirrored
idk wym
You know how even functions are symmetric about y axis?
no
no, odd functions have rotational symmetry about the origin
???
can someone just give me the answer plz i cant let my grade drop 😭
just take some ‘x’ and note the value if it’s the - of the value at f(-x) it’s odd
The function won’t be odd due to just one value but you can check
They arent reading anything
essentially if you rotate the graph 180 degrees around the origin, it should be the same

and thats how u tell
if its even
or
odd
?
odd
ok ima try ina minute
can i do it in vc and u show me what im suppoed to lookk for
i wont talk
ok wait look
black is the reflection
what do i do now
they all map onto eachother but the parabola @restive river
@peak jungle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
shouldnt it be undefined cus it has ln0
what's the original question?
It's an improper integral, meaning you need to calculate $\lim_{a \to 0} \int_a^1 f(x) dx$.
Morrow
(Presumably)
But isn’t it still ln0
Lnx/sqrtx
converges alright
if you look at the overall form it's infinity*0 which is indeterminate
so you need to take the limit
What I don’t understand
Where infinity times 0
it's sqrt(x) * ln x with some other stuff mixed in
see if sqrt(x) * ln(x) has a limit as x->0
0*(ln(0) - 2) = 0*(-infinity - 2) = 0*infinity
How’s ln0 equal -inf
Yeah so I plug in x as 0?
no, then you get 0 * (-inf) like neon is saying
,w ln(0)
"ln" is a function whose domain is (0, ∞), so "ln 0" is undefined
to get e to be 0 you raise it to -infinity
You're multiplying something really close to zero by something really negative, so it's unclear what you're going to get until you sit down and calculate the limit.
Bruh what I thought this was undefined
if someone ever says a function "equals" -infinity or infinity then they're talking about the limit in general
So this is graph of ln0
wolframalpha is a scheme by big engineering to sell more notational shortcuts
It's the graph of ln x
You can see what happens if x is a really small positive number
ln x becomes a really negative number
,w ln(0.000000001)
So the limit of ln(x) as x->0 is -inf.
ln(0) isn't really a thing, but if you say ln(0) people will assume you're referring to that limit
So how’s it equal -4 when it’s a number - inf
I can plug in an even smaller number if you want to see how it goes to -inf
,w ln(10^(-100000))
Actually does calc work here
Result:
-Infinity
Anyways here you can see that we got -230000 or so
If you try to plug in smaller and smaller numbers you'll get closer and closer to -inf
Ok so how it’s not divergent
It is, but that's plain old ln(x)
If ur minusing infinite
You have a sqrt(x) multiplying it
If you multiply a really negative number by a number close to zero it's unclear what you get as a result
like, 10^(-10000) * -20 is a really small number, for example.
on the other hand 0.01 * -20000000000 is a really negative number
Bruh what am I suppose to do then
What tools do you have for calculating limits
Idk l hopital cus inf times 0?
Yeah lhopital is a good idea
without l'Hôpital is even better
What
lhopital works, let's go with it
for lhopital you need to get it into the form "0/0" or "inf/inf", can you see how to massage sqrt(x) ln(x) into one of those forms?
just use a simple substitution like u = ln x, then x = exp(u)
exponential times polynomial power function, so the limit should be easy
Move the 2sqrtx to become 2x^-(1/2)?
But it’s already integrated
Yeah
so? you're computing the limit
Well, 2ln(x)/x^(-1/2)
to use l'Hôpital, you need to get the derivatives correct
it's less error-prone to do simple substitutions, and have the basic fact in mind that exponential grows much quicker than power function/polynomials
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/2526702/290189
@orchid wasp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
bare with me, i am just learning limits now and the lecturer has really bad notes
,tex $\lim\limits_{x \rightarrow 3^+} \sqrt{9 -x^2}$
suds
are you looking for a proof or only for computation?
but the teacher said it does not exist since x -> 3+ => x > 3
actually, hold on.
my question is why does the limit being x-> 3+ mean that x > 3
prompt is "Evaluate the following limits"
$x \to 3^+$ means $x$ approaches 3 \textbf{from the right}.
Ann
it's the notation for one-sided limits.
^+ means from the right and ^- means from the left
so this was the image of notes that explained it
- more but
the image suggests that the function can be before or after c
so limits actually is its only on this side?
like limit is the asymptote?
i think "limit is the asymptote" is really overthinking it
right so heres the thing
i mean if it makes sense 🤷
whether you can talk about $\lim_{x \to c^+} f(x)$ and/or $\lim_{x \to c^-} f(x)$ depends entirely on the domain of $f$
Ann
not all limits involve asymptotes...
what i mean by that is the limit is something that the function cannot pass
thats a misconception
like x -> 3+ means that it goes towards 3 from the positive side, but it cannot reach it
like when u limit x-> 0 in derivatives
i think you're maybe confusing "the limit" with "the value that x goes to"
where x goes vs. where f(x) goes
these notes are really confusing, even with concepts i already know, they say it in weird ways
when calculating a limit, the former is given while the latter is what needs to be computed
oh so the difference is that the limit is the f(x) value given the x -> 3
which u compute with the following expression
ah
ok now i jsut need to write this in a way that makes sense for my notes lmao
but for this question in particular, the limit does not exist because there is no function value fro the function at x = 3
?
more like the domain doesn't extend to the right of x=3.
the limit doesnt even make sense to talk about
^
you cant even say DNE
there's nowhere for x to even be to approach 3 from the right
Closed by @hot ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
I am very confused on limits to infinity
i am trying to say what i think this is trying to say but i dont even know
so a rational function is one in which P(x) / Q(x) = f(x) where P(x) and Q(x) are polynomials
"dividing through by the highest power of x"
what do they mean by that? like if the polynomial is x^5, they use 5? or they divide by x^5
they mean divide both numerator and denominator by x^5
e.g. [ \frac{3x^3 + 4x^2}{6x^5 - 2x} \cdot \frac{1/x^5}{1/x^5} ]
cloud
so the highest power in either P(x) or Q(x)?
yes
ok
and then I don't know what it means "using the simple results that for any value of p > 0" and the limit notation
e.g. [ \lim_{x\to \infty}\frac{3x^3 + 4x^2}{6x^5 - 2x} \cdot \frac{1/x^5}{1/x^5} = \lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{3/x^2 + 4/x^3}{6-2/x^4} = \frac{3(0) + 4(0)}{6-2(0)}]
because
[ \lim_{x\to\infty} \frac 1{x^2} = 0 ] and similarly for all other powers
cloud
where did the 0's come from?
this is because [ \lim_{x\to\infty} \frac 1{x^p} = 0 \qq{and} \lim_{x\to-\infty} \frac{1}{x^p} = 0 ]
so p = 2
cloud
the result holds for any positive number p, so we apply it for p = 2, p = 3, and p = 4 here
yes, it allows us to evaluate the limit of the rational function
ok i see
now i just need to think of a way to write that lol
one more thing sorry
as i was checking over my notes for rational functioms
i mostly understand this but theres some weird wording
"which will "cancel out" the problematic indeterminate form"
does it mean it cancels out 0/0 or the expression cancels out?
u cancel x-a
when you evaluate that limit it will be in the form 0/0. but factoring out (x-a) will cancel it out, leaving you with something which is not 0/0
ok yeah
e.g. [ \lim_{x \to 3} \frac{x^2 - x - 6}{x^2 + x -12} ``='' {0}{0} ] but we evaluate it as [ \lim_{x \to 3} \frac{x^2 - x - 6}{x^2 + x -12} = \lim_{x \to 3} \frac{\cancel{(x-3)}(x+2)}{\cancel{(x-3)}(x+4)} = \frac{5}{8} ]
cloud
that was just really bad wording i feel
okay i got it thank you :D
how do you come up with examples on the fly like that
for this one i came up with the factored forms first and then multiplied them out
nice okay
@hot ferry Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @hot ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey can somebody help me solve this linear system of ODE
So far I have managed to identify the repeated eigenvector [-1 2] with eigenvalue 5
so I calculate the generalized eigenvector and i get
[-1 0] + t[-1 2]
yet for some reason this is wrong
,w eigenvector [[7,1],[-4,3]]
,w rref[[2,1,-1],[-4,-2,2]]
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
ur generalized evec looks wrong
,rotate
skm
this looks ok
just dont forget e^5t in the solution
ye
for now im just solving for the vector
does this vector look ok?
yes
e^{5t}(w+tv)
uhh yeah
its ok no need to show me if u understand
plus e^{5t}(v)
yes
and for some reason I think its wrong
well u need c1 and c2 too
$$ \begin{bmatrix}
-1 & -1 \
2 & 0
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
c_1 \
c_2
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
2 \
-5
\end{bmatrix}
skm
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Would you be willing to do it with me? I can’t quite figure it out
@gritty sandal Has your question been resolved?
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Closed by @gritty sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hii
hi
Yeah
Good
Im a little confused on the next steps
Ok
I got dcf to be -2x
Yes that's right
What is the sum of the angles DcF aand DCB?
180-2x
No
No
Sure
90-x
DCF+DCB= 90-x?
180
Yesssss
Mb mb
DCF + DCB = 180
And we have already calculated dcf
So we can Calculate Dcb too, right?
-2x
Use this
180+2x
Angle dcf is negative 2x?
yeah?
Why is that negative?
180 - 2(90-x)
180-2x
Yupp
Now, do you know the special property of cyclic quadrilaterals?
Opposite add to 180
You have to prove that DAB is 2x right?
Yh
why did u already put it 2x
Here
Its part b
Can u show me how to prove it ?
No sry
okk
First of all we need to calculate angle ADC
What do u think, how ccan we calculate it
What is y
recheck
180-90-x
nope
180-(90-x)
U forgot the bracketsss
Oh alr
Kk
Do u know the sum of angles BAD and ADC?
180
Kk
And you'll the answer
Tysm
:D welccome daddy dumpling
Thank you sheesh
loll byeee
Kk
Just one
Hmm
I assume that fkj is also 2x
Okkk
Okk
Jfg is 180-(3y+98)
oh
Both are radi so its a isosplies
Isoslies triangle
Nvm thats weong
Wrong*
whats ur solution
The angles formed by a chord on the same arc of a circle are equal
Lemme google it what's that, idk the names of theorems srry
yea ig
I used that to get fkj
Good
Oki
Their parallel ?
i don't know the name of that property but i can try to tell u
Noo
Lemmme send u a picc of that property
Cuz its a Z shape
Yes yesss
Internal alternate angles
Alternate angle therom
Ooh smart guyyy
Lol I just used google translate but thanks
:)
So its also equal
Yess
Night*
:)
🙂
Haha byeeeee best of luck
Btw what is gse?
oH
And then sixform to get into uni
that's cool
But im taking it early cuz my skl is stupid
Would u mind telling me ur age?
Im 16
You too have a good night
加油朋友!
🙂
谢谢
我的中文水平不太适合
我的不好
我看见了你写的诗,很厉害啊
对
嗯,我是加拿大移民
但是我是在这出生的
当然没有中国卷
对
哦对,有时差
谢谢你
晚安,认识你很高兴!
@twin frost Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @twin frost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i copy a photo
@hallow brook Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rccw
Yeeep
Tyty
lol
Closed by @full ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can this bound be argued ?
via induction you could prove a closed form for the sum
or by seeing it as the derivative of the geometric sum
or by some combinatorial argument
(namely the sum is equal to ||k 2^k - 2^k+1||)
Yes. Thank you. I was thinking about finding a combinatorial argument but couldnt find it
Tried that as well but was unable to conclude something useful
Ok thanks a lot I will try it again
.close
Closed by @ionic swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
3log3(8) the first 3 is confusing can someone please explain it ?
the instructions are to solve it
3 times log base 3 of 8
mhmm
What is confusing about this?
nothing
It seems to be in its most simplified form
I just didn't know what the 3 was suppose to mean
But if you can use a calculator
3 constant
Problem solved then?
Closed by @obsidian plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
actually one more question would this apply only to the base or the 8 too ?
.reopen
✅
$a \log_b(c)$ is $a$ times log base $b$ of $c$.
OmnipotentEntity
Doesn't matter what you put into a, b, c so long as they are legal values.
Closed by @obsidian plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im trying to revise
and the page im using
doesnt come with answers
could anyone tell me if i got it right please
750.8
to 3 significant figures
surface area btw
cut it out sorry
but yeah you have to find the total surface area of that shape
,w 6100+2pi38
looks good
thanks so much :)
@calm fern Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A rectangular field of given area is to be fenced off along the bank of a river. If no fence is needed along the river, what is the shape of the rectangle requiring the least amount of fencing?
we have 2x+y=a
the a doesn’t matter bc we’re just finding the ratios
maximize xy with constraint 2x+y=a
these were the equations i got
A = xy ; x = A/y
P = x+2y
x is the length and y is the width
A = xP-x^2 / 2
what’s your expression for y?
y = A/x
but we’re gonna use the expression for y in A so it can’t rely on A
oh is it P = x+2A/x
how?
idk if my solving if correct but i got
A = 2x+P/2
@deep gale Has your question been resolved?
@deep gale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I’m currently in calculus but have a question about some circle theorem/euclidean geometry problem. I’ve tried asking for help from the most up to date AI models, and even reverse searched this image to no true avail. If know your stuff on this matter I implore you for your assistance.
I know that angle AOB is 2x due to the isosceles nature of triangle AOB. I know that in triangle AOC, angle OAC and OCA are equal. I need some help and finishing this analysis though.
Do they mean this shape specifically or any triangle?
?
Proving that angle w is equal to angle x + 90 is the task.
<@&286206848099549185> (it’s been ten minutes, and if I remember correctly you’re allowed to @ helpers at this time)
(15)
?
so CAB=ABC
How can you deduct that?
bc its isoceles
triangle ABC?
anyone able to help with this😭, me and my friend get different answers
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
How do you extend triangles ABOs isosceles nature to facts about triangle ABC?
Inside triangle ABO?
yes
I know ABO is isosceles, and angle AOB would be 180 - 2x, right?
I’m just uncertain on how to get from there to classifying facts about triangle ABC
AOB subtends AB
so ACB is half AOB
ACB=90-x
ACD is a straight line so 90-x+w=180
90+w=180+x
w=x+90
I know that ACB is half of AOB, but how do you then get ACB = 90 - x?
bc (180-2x)/2
180-2x is derived from AOB, right?
ya AC