#help-27
1 messages · Page 319 of 1
ooo okay
general rule is all x must go after taking limit
so remove x then sub and take the limit?
well u take the limit by subbing, theyre not separate steps
if u sub correctly u get
yea sorry thats what i meant đ
$\frac{-\sqrt{0+16}}{1+0}$
ăă±ăăăžăŁăłă
in short response its good to replace before simplifying đ
𫥠on it captain
we took it slow
so basically what im understanding about limits to inf is to factor the dominant on the top and bottom, remove any x, then take the limit?
to avoid common student errors
yea i really appreciate that we took it slow đ limits are the most confusing part about calc for me
when u say remove any x, do u mean cancel common factors?
yea
yes
like how we cancelled the x/x
u can also cancel x^7 if its common
x^7?
if u have to factor out x^7 on top and bottom
just to make sure when we cancel out stuff like that it still leaves behind the hole on the graph right?
why specifically x^7? /genq
yes
i understand a lot better now, tysm!!
np 
so much joy here 
Closed by @ivory salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi so here you have to check if the like dimension that goes through the points is parallel to one of the coordinate dimensions
wait let me just translate
The plane passing through the points ABC is parallel to a coordinate plane
so when do i know if thats the case generally?
if one of the coordinate on the vectors is 0
then its parallel?
die Punkte liegen alle in der Ebene z = 4
das erkennst du daran weil, der Wert konstant bleibt
nicht wirklich
die können irgendwie in der eben z = 4 liegen
oder meinst du was anderes
also
wenn die ebene parallel zur koordinaten ebene ist
dann muss bei den vektoren x y oder z 0 sein oder
meinst du sowas wie 0x+0y+z=4
achso ich versteh glaube ich
wenn du die ebenen darstellung hast meinst du?
die richtungsvektoren?
aber wie weiĂ ich generell ob die ebene die durch die punkte geht parallel zu den koordinatenebene ist
also angenommen du hast einen ortsvektor
Ich weiĂ nicht was genau Q war aber
Aber angenommen Q ist ein Ortsvektor
damit du feststellst ob es eine ebene ist die parallel zu einer koordinatenebene ist da muss zum beispiel hier die z komponente der Richtungsvektoren 0 sein
weil ansonsten wÀre die ebene schief
weil dann ein Vektor sozusagen nicht mehr flach liegt
weiĂt du warum man hier minus rechnen muss
so ist das definiert
ich versuch mal ein Bild zu malen
QR heiĂt du willst von Q nach R gelangen
naja
Du fÀngst bei Q
und gehst in die entgegengesetzte Richtung
das ist -Q
und dann gehst du entlang +R
also rechnst du (-Q)+R also R-Q
hÀ aber
die entgegengesetze richtung
achso
ok ich check
aber was hast du da gezeichnet?
ja wie man R-Q geometrisch interpretiert
Richtungen
Pfade
Vektoren
Intuition hier rein bringen
was hat dann die frau gezeichnet?
also
die vorherige zeichnung
das bist du der da entlang lÀuft
entlang -Q und dann R
schlieĂlich zĂ€hlst du es ja zsm den Weg
also wenn ich von q -q entlang gehe
und dann plus R
dann komme ich auf R
ja mach dann bist du aber nicht bei R
wo bin ich dann sonst hö
du verfÀhrst dich komplett
RQ oder was
aber woher weiĂ ich wann ich plus rechnen muss
und wann minus
merk dir das einfach
ist das 0 oder o
A nach B machst du B - A
O steht fĂŒr den Nullvektor ja
ist die eigentliche Schreibweise
damit man einen Bezug hat
ich schreibe freitag eine kurzarbeit ich checke nichts
aber egal
also dings
was wÀre aber A+B
hĂ€?đ
dann stell doch fragen
weiter machen bringt dann auch nichts
das baut sich auf
ja
moment gibt eine sekunde
guck mal nochmal
Stell dir vor du bist bei A und willst nach B
orange da ist baustelle zum Beispiel
also hast du keine Wahl
du hast dich verlaufen und du must A zurĂŒck gehen also -A
angelangt bei O gehst du entlang B
um nach B zu kommen
jetzt addierst du den Weg (-A) + B = B - A das ist dann die Richtung um von A nach B zu kommen
Im Prinzip ist es besser zu sagen, du addierst immer die Vektoren, die Frage ist wann gehst du vorwĂ€rts, wann rĂŒckwĂ€rts
Ja
Angenommen du bist bei O und will nach B dann kannst du dich zwischen zwei Wegen entscheiden
entweder blau oder grĂŒn + orange
Also
OB = O + B sozusagen
OB = A + AB = A + (B - A) = B
funktioniert beides
in beiden fÀllen lÀufst du nur vorwÀrts
aber vorher warst du gezwungen rĂŒckwĂ€rts zu gehen, und da sagt man mathematisch minus
um die Gegenrichtung zu benennen
also bei unseren beispieLĂ
?
was mit dem
du meintest
vorher warst du gezwungen ..
also meinst du das hier
hier geht man aber doch nicht minus oder
ja hier gehst du auch von Q erst zurĂŒck zum Bezugspunkt und dann entlang R
nee ich glaub nicht
also
weiĂt du noch letzte woche
diese parallelogram aufgabe
sowas halt
ja sowas halt ist vektorgeometrie
ja
ich vergesse aber immer dass du noch schule gehst haha
und wahrscheinlich anderes zeug
das machts bisschen stressiger
ok ok
also
mischprobleme???
digga
ehrenlos
egal
ich check dieses skalarprodukt nicht
wie das funktioniert?
warte
lmao
das ist nicht das Skalarprodukt
oh man die Terminologie is so scheiĂe auf deutsch
skalar ist einfach eine zahl
wie 4 mal (1,2,3) hier ist 4 die zahl
das ist doch intuitiv
einfach mit jeder komponente multiplizieren
achso
hÀ digga
warum muss man jetzt extra skalar sagen
Soll ich es dir erklÀren hahaha
In der Mathematik ist das Skalarprodukt eine Art Funktion
zwei Vektoren bilden auf einen Skalar ab
des wegen Skalarprodukt
das ist der Grund
skalar Multiplikation heiĂt wortwörtlich aber zahl mal vektor nicht vektor mal vektor
ok warte
fĂŒr was braucht man die meistens
im Abi wirst dus brauchen oder im test
ja
aber
ich mein
so von der fragestellung her
werden die mir direkt fragen was ist das skalarprodukt oder wie
hahaha das denke ich nicht
zu 99 %
du wirst da iwas rechnen halt
ist halt schule
du verwendest das gelernte an, und tust es nicht erklÀren
der mathelehrer hat auch nichts davon wenn du auswendig lernst, wie das skalarprodukt funktioniert
ja
was wĂ€re ein beispiel dafĂŒr
wie viel punkte hattest du im mathe abi
berechnen Sie das Skalarprodukt der Vektoren (1,2,3) und (3,4,5)
Welchen Winkel haben die Vektoren?
gut das kommt auch drauf an mit oder ohne taschenrechner wie die vektoren sind
genug zum Bestehen
ja
ok ok
hattest du auch Lk
denje ja kp mehr
guckmal bruder was ist das fĂŒr ein scheiĂ
ja das ist eine perfekte ĂŒbung
wo du das Skalarprodukt brauchst
weil die Norm eines Vektors ist nichts weiteres wie die Wurzel aus dem Skalarprodukt eines Vektors mit sich selber
oder einfacher
das rechnest du aus und setzt es gleich 10 und löst fĂŒr b
das ist wie als wenn du eine quadratische gleichung lösen wĂŒrdest
so 8. klasse
was du hier können musst also sind die Definitionen
was bedeutet nochmal LĂ€nge mathematisch
und dann folgt der Rest von alleine
jetzt anwenden
also
ich bin mir sicher du bist gerade erschöpft
weil die aufgabenstellung ist eigentlich klar
die LĂ€nge soll gleich 10 sein von a
und das ist die Formel fĂŒr die LĂ€nge
jetzt musst du a mal a rechnen, das ist nichts weiteres wie das skalarprodukt
ist der teil b
also die koordinaten von b
achso
es ist abc
und nicht x y z
oder
what
ach digga
ist doch wurst
2b^2-4 ist die erste Komponente
bei 3 Komponenten einfach die Dritte mal die Dritte
achso
du machst dann a mal a
ja deswegen meinte ich
warte
also
digga die sind so dumm
warum schreiben die -4
man denkt es ist noch ein vektor da drinne
ja genau
also 10 =
jetzt machst du weiter sonst bringt das nichts
ja
du musst den test schreiben nicht ich
ja hast recht sir
danke sie
[ \sqrt{ \begin{pmatrix} 2b^2-4 \ 9 \ \sqrt{3} \end{pmatrix} \dotproduct \begin{pmatrix} 2b^2-4 \ 9 \ \sqrt{3} \end{pmatrix} } = \sqrt{(2b^2-4)^2+9^2+(\sqrt{3})^2} \stackrel{!}{=} 10 ]
keine ahnung wie ich das lesen sol
yep dann kannst du die terme zsm fassen und beide seiten quadrieren
und diese quartische gleichung kann man mit substitution in eine quadratische umwandeln
ja das alles baut auf von der 11.
locker
ich kann das noch
ahh warte
binomische formel
usw
ja cooked
bro ich geh jetzt penne
ja
gute nacht
@neon wagon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @neon wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me
Closed by @uncut tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! looking for help with quadratic equations
have any specific questions?
Yeah I would say a few, I'm just starting it now for a college algebra class but don't really understand a few steps
okay ask
Alrighty!
thanks
Alright I am being asked to solve quadratic equations by using the zero product property
The formula is a^2 + bx + c = 0
So for the first equation
I have x^2 - 8x = 0
You have to factorize that
$xx - 8x$
Luca M
whats the common factor
x ?
$x(x-8)$
Luca M
is because x is squared
yeah. x^2 is just notation that means the same thing as x * x
I guess im also confused as in like
what I am allowed to do
so if its common amongst the equation thats what I factor ?
yeah. Every term needs to have it
yeah
Alright im sorta there so far
so now we have x (x - 8) = 0
wait sorry
what happened to the x that was orginally 8x
so in x^2-8x, we have 2 terms
One is x^2, and one is -8x
When we are factorising, we are taking out a common factor from all the terms
Which we saw was x
So we remove that x from every term
Leaving just x-8
And we then multiply this that is left all by the x we took out
oh so we are allowed to just "remove" them
As long as you then multiply the x outside by what is left
I thought factoring was just sorta spreading out what was already there
oooo
thats going to be a little hard to grasp
but I sorta understand
Yeah it is, they are both equivalent
You can show this by going back from the factorised form to the expanded form
I guess what im a little lost by
since this is the way im seeing it
I know if we multiplied that 8 by x we would have the 8x we originally had
but how does that x get in front of - 8
since if we were taking an x off of the x^2 what is it multiplied by
Yeah your taking a common factor of x out of the x^2 which leaves behind 1 x
ah ok
understood
so now that brings us to x ( x - 8 ) = 0
now since we factored x we need to factor -8 ?
Thatâs already fully factorised
Because there is no more factors that are the same between x and -8
Before x^2 and -8x both shared a factor of x which is why we could take the x out of both of them
Alright
whats the general rule for that
if values are being shared we need to get rid of them ?
this formula is relevant for what rule ?
Yeah, this is the idea of factorising.
We want it in a form where none of the terms share a common factor
Yes, however this example is easier because notice that the constant +c is 0
oo
so going back to where we left off
I guess i couldn't see that
but x(x - 8) = 0
Yeah. So now the zero product property
It pretty much says if you have two numbers a and b, if their product a*b=0, then the only way this can happen is if either a=0 or b=0
Yeah the equation is satisfied when either of the factors equals 0
So if we want to find out when each factor is equal to 0, we need to solve 2 things
x=0 and (x-8)=0
ohh
And x=0 is already solved, so all you need to do is solve x-8=0 for x
how is x = 0 already solved ?
We want to find out what number x has to be to be equal to 0. What number is that?
Exactly
bc there is nothing in that equation
compared to like
x - 8 = 0
so i need to get rid of the 8
so i add 8 and add 8 to the 0
Yeah
so that would give me x = 8
Yep, and thatâs all
oh so the other solved it self
You have your two solutions x=0 or x=8 which will make the original equation true
And you can check it by replacing the x in x^2-8x by 0 and then replacing it by 8
And both times the answer should be 0
Yeah
What do you mean by -12 4, -12*4?
So your first goal should always be to get one side of the equation to be = 0
How would you do that in this case
@oblique girder Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am confused about the domain of series
so, for example you have a series where the limit is |x-3| and you used the root test
wait no
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
i dont even have an original problem
i am just confused about the domain part
i can show the example
thatâs what i meant by original problem
this
so we did root test
and the limit is |x-3|
because the limit is not a definite value, we need the domain the then find convergence ?
use the ratio test to find the radius
are radius and domain not the same
but yes youll get |x - 3| < 1
so your radius isâŠ
did you check the endpoints sir
its [2,4)
so whatâs the problem?
this is my question
i already have the work and answers
i am asking in general
if there is a value like x in the limit
you mean itâs not a definite value because of |x-3|?
well thatâs the whole point, as per the ratio/root test you want the limit to be less than 1 so that it converges
my prof went over it today using the term domain and then mentioned radius
and i didnt understand
and you find the interval so that itâs satisfied
so you set the limit <1 by default ?
and then solve by plugging the endpoints into the series
^
well yea the entire goal is to find where the power series converges
yes well youâll need to check the endpoints because youâll only find the radius
it wonât tell you if it converges at the endpoints
do you know what converges conditionally means?
i mean like i think i know what youâre trying to say
yeah idk how else to word it
are you trying to say it converges provided that x is in the interval [2, 4)?
it converges on a small interval
that being the "condition"
yeah
then yes thatâs correct but thatâs not how the term conditional convergence is used
conditional convergence is used when a series converges but not absolutely
so when the sum of the absolute value of the terms diverges but the original series converges
youâre welcome
.close
Closed by @wintry flare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to show that $\mathbb{Z}$ with the usual addition and multiplication operations is not an algebraic structure of the same type?
Halex
"An algebraic structure of the same type" doesn't parse for me. Are we missing some of the question?
the addition and multiplication operations in Z are not algebraic structures of the same type
maybe my question is not well formulated
@still zephyr Has your question been resolved?
@still zephyr Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does this mean there are 2 inverse functions?
It's likely a result of how you would end up with two solutions when solving for the inverse of $1 + u + u^2$
Azyrashacorki
Maybe not one sec
Yeah idk if the first one isn't even defined for any x I think.
The sqrt is only defined for x >= 3/4.
For 3/4 <= x < 1, the numerator is positive and the denominator is negative, so it's not defined in the log.
For x > 1, then the numerator is negative and the denominator is positive, so it's not defined in the log.
@neon folio Has your question been resolved?
it's something about complex numbers,
but sometimes both of them doesn't work
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@pseudo basin
p_i is replaced with r_i
the best i can assume is that they meant r_i when they said p_i, and that in the first sentence they meant to put dependent in the first sentence of part d
but whoever wrote this problem was inexcusably sloppy
based on the echelon form, if it's independent then how do I do part (d)?
reduce it further until you solve the system
@outer rover Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I find the natural domain and range of f(z)=e^z
for what z is the function defined?
Complex
is e^z defined for all z in C?
I guess ? How should I find the range then
yeah
state it here
e^ix = cosx +isinx
that's the exponential of a pure imaginary number
o
are there any pairs of reals (x,y) for which e^(x+iy) is undefined or doesn't exist?
if so, what are they?
Would it help to think about the default e^x graph
I donât know I donât think so?
e^(x+iy) = e^x (cos(y) + i sin(y))
do exp, sin and cos of a REAL variable ever fail to exist?
Well e^x can be raised to any number and sin cos is defined for all real x
so, they never throw an error.
does this now let you conclude with confidence that e^z is defined on the entire complex plane?
So the imaginary part of sin, the âisin(y)â doesnât change anything about its graph? Like Iâm referring to the i being multiplied
talking about a "graph" at this juncture is a little tricky.
What would be the right terminology
for what
yes
yes
now the range
specifically for e^z, you might think about how writing a complex number in polar form is almost the same as writing it as a value of e^z at some other point
re^(iΞ) = e^(log(r)+iΞ)
Why do we introduce a log?
How does this help us tho?
what is the one complex number that doesn't have a polar form at all?
indeed
Well
this is the only number not in the range of e^z
0 +0i
you don't need to pretend like 0 the real and 0+0i the complex are two somehow fundamentally different things unworthy of being treated as the same
Well I figured I should use the proper notation even tho they are the same thing
this adds no propriety
What does e^z look like graphically Iâm having trouble visualising this
Wait maybe I can
,w graph e^z
this will only get you the real graph
Hm
graphing complex functions is much more difficult bc you need 4 real dimensions to do it the same way as real ones
Oh so the only way to find the range is pretty much algebraically?
... yes
wow
So whatâs the process of finding the range of complex functions then is it the same for every complex function?
Like with real functions you could either graph it to find the range or take itâs inverse and find the domain of that
there is no "process"
what
So then what are you supposed to do
If e^z has range 0 to all C
then for other complex functions if thereâs no approach what do u do?
no
its range is C \ {0}
- if there was something general to say then i would have said it already tbh
@smoky gyro Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hii, I don't even know how to start (c) and (d). Can someone help?
yup yup
I have no idea either T.T
ohh is A x B not the answer for (b)
it's an answer for b
probably the easiest
maybe they mean putting it in spherical coordinates?
so you can calculate theta and phi
ohhh
what if they're asking the angles of A x B with respect to the axes
yea i guess
i have no idea what direction angles mean
hm should i just do that
okiidokii, ill do that thanks for the help!
but wait idk how to do that HAHAH
ohh, so like arccos (a.b)/( |a| |b| )
yea
a . b in this case will be very easy to calculate
same with |b| if it's a unit vector
so it should be pretty quick
okay im sorry but i still don't have great intuition with these can u help me haha
0 , 7 , -5
ok cool
0i + 7j - 5k
so we want to find the angle between that and 1i
the magnitude of the first thing is
oh?
,calc sqrt(7 * 7 + 5 * 5)
what is 1i? sorry for late replies the wifi is p bad
Result:
8.6023252670426
like the unit vectors i j and k
1i is just <1, 0, 0>
if we want to find the angle between <0, 7, -5> and <1, 0, 0> we take their dot product, divide by 8.6, and take arccos
dot product between those is 0, so the angle is Ï/2
ohhhhhhhh rightt !!
okayy ill try
sure. remember, take the dot product between them, divide by 8.6 (that's the magnitude of A x B) and take arccos
yep
yep exactly
you'd also divide by || <0, 1, 0> || but like that's just 1 haha
ohhhhhhhhh
okay okay
okayy thank u sm
i think i got it now. Thanks for your help!
how do i close the channel
type .close
Closed by @green edge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
integral of 1/root of 1+ sinx. please help đ
$\int \frac{\dd x}{\sqrt{1 + \sin x}}$
what have you tried?
@ripe meteor Has your question been resolved?
try to find write this as a perfect square
ok so that was the hard part
you can rewrite sint + cost entirely in terms of sin, then its a trivial integral
@ripe meteor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a
.close
Closed by @vast delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone explain to me what I'm supposed to do? I don't understand what they want me to do.
Do I need to have it reflected across all 4 quadrants
each line is a symmetrical reflection
Closed by @vestal bay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am confused how my teacher got this as the answer
,rccw
you can use similarity to prove
also what exactly is the Question
yea can do it by similarity
Something about a pekka explaining math
that's sth that OP has to explain clearly, say
||apply the Intercept Thorem to the following figure and state the results||
@shy hearth Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help question 3
@serene horizon Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> *
@serene horizon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone know spanish..
I have some questions on a test
You can post the problem dw
I mean its a math server
lol
Im sure there is spanish server where you can put questions
yes i am waiting on a responce there
Ok but in that case close this channel as long this is not math related
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@woven tundra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was trying to derive the sum of squares equation and I am getting an answer that is not correct, but I can't find the flaw in my reasoning
Where is (n-1) coming from? There's only n/2 pairs of terms, so this part of the sum should have n/2 terms.
also this isn't consistent with your first few terms in the sequence
(Also, all of this makes the implicit assumption that n is even)
I see
Any questions before I dip? B/c imma go in a minute.
Would this produce the right equation anyway if those two errors you spotted were fixed?
And all the math was done correctly after that
it should
I would make the arguments of why the patterns work out like that a bit more rigorous
unless this is just for yourself, in which case you can include however much detail you want
Its just for myself, my friend asked me to derive that equation and i tried like 3 different methods before i landed on this one
But anyway
.close
Closed by @slender lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Oh on that note
The classic argument to derive the sum of squares formula is to consider a telescoping argument
I'll start with this: Find a cubic $p(n)$ such that $$p(n+1)-p(n)=n^2$$
Civil Service Pigeon
this is the same logic used to find a formula for the sums of higher powers too
as finding patterns like this becomes increasingly difficult
Additional remark: This relates to the idea of ||telescoping series||
Maybe a P.S.? You can also ||consider the sum of (i+1)^3 - i^3|| and finagle the sum of squares out of that
Oh more random shit: You can also use binomial coefficients and hockey stick
Oh I may have done something like this, where I thought about it in terms of stacking blocks, like I would have one block to represent 1^2, 4 blocks to represent 2^2, and then I just line up those right next to each other, and it grows in accordance with an nxnxn cube, so I thought: Okay, so this sum represents some fraction of an nxnxn cube, which means its cubic. So I just did a system of 5 equations to solve for the 4 different variables of a cubic
Oh remark for that too
The Lagrange interpolating polynomial is the polynomial P(x) of degree <=(n-1) that passes through the n points (x_1,y_1=f(x_1)), (x_2,y_2=f(x_2)), ..., (x_n,y_n=f(x_n)), and is given by P(x)=sum_(j=1)^nP_j(x), (1) where P_j(x)=y_jproduct_(k=1; k!=j)^n(x-x_k)/(x_j-x_k). (2) Written explicitly, P(x) = (3) The formula was first publishe...
This way you don't have to bash a system
although if you use finite diferences, the system isn't awful tbf
Oh also more general remark: The sum of i^k from i=1 to n is a polynomial of degree (k+1)
ok I'm done yapping for now
I'm extremely new to this type of algebra, like i had to google what the summation notation was when my friend sent it to me đ
F
oh it's already closed
there's just a lag
between when you use the command
and it actually closing
Darn
as you can tell, I really took advantage of that gap lol
I guess that worked out
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If the tan of angle x is 22/5 and the triangle was dilated to be two times as big as the original, what would be the value of the tan of x for the dilated triangle?Â
Would I double the 22/5 to make 44/10, or would it just simplify back to 22/5 anyways and there's no point?
yes
Scaling a triangle doesnât change its angles
correct
okay, I figured. Thank you so much!
tan of x, but the triangle is dilated by a scale factor of 2
trig functions are by defintion scale invariant
yes ik
tan(x) just takes x as input
no side lengths
so yes it remains the same
Oh, I see what you mean
yes
Closed by @limpid epoch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm unsure how to do this without numbers. i can't find the derivative
Well you can just compare the tangent lines at the points they are asking, no need for derivatives
Whichever one is steeper is going faster
how do i compare them
how do i know the tangent line
like d/dx? i assume pink is x2 so derivative is x?
Maybe use a ruler and place it on the line at those points to see it better?
pretty sure that's not what we are supposed to do
Hmm well Iâm pretty sure it is
how do i draw the tangent line?
Itâs just about interpreting derivatives graphically
.
ahh, but i'm still unsure how to draw it with the ruler, even with ur explanation
how do i know where to trace
@chilly pivot Has your question been resolved?
@chilly pivot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I have the equation W(x)=-x(x-32) does the -x mean Iâm reflecting over the y axis or x axis? I know if I had g(x)=-f(x+3) I would reflect over the x axis. But if I had g(x)=f(-x+3) I would reflect over the y
@mellow willow Has your question been resolved?
y axis
y = x ---> y = -x (graph the difference)
More generally, when you put the negative sign in front of f(x), you're affecting the y value, so you're reflecting over the x axis. If you put the negative sign in front of x, you're felecting the x value, so you're reflecting over the y axis.
Even tho itâs outside the function?
it depends what the original function is
it's a reflection over the y axis of x(-x-32)
and it's a reflection over the x axis of x(x-32)
Iâm trying to do horizontal compressions and stretched. This one is a horizontal compression and those are the two points, we are going from f to g. I know in the equation k must equal somthing greater than 1. Is mine correct?
@mellow willow Has your question been resolved?
How do I do this table? Would the final row be the opppsite values of the h(x) row or the c row
,rccw
I desperately need help I am so confused. Why would B be affected by A vertical stretch or compress factor ?
@mellow willow Has your question been resolved?
I'm sleeping soon, so I may not be able to give you an answer, but it might be helpful if you try to word it a little more clearly (e.g. exactly which equation/sentence are you confused about? what about it is confusing/hard to understand)
a lot of less esoteric questions in this server often remain unanswered simply because it's quite hard to understand what the author is asking
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I have a question about a statistic thing.
I'm doing an experiment, where I'm collecting n samples from a (presumably normal) distribution and taking their average x
then doing the same, collecting n samples from another presumably normal distribution, and taking their average y
My prior belief is that like x and y are around 60 apart and that the two distributions have the same variance (sample variance after 5 samples from x is around 100)
How big should n be so that I'm certain I can distinguish mean(X) and mean(Y) if they really have different means?
..
My thoughts is that, at the end, I'm gonna do a two sample t-test.
But like, its expensive to collect more samples
So I want to know when I can stop collecting samples.
Like if i've collected 100 samples of x and the mean is 140 and the sample variance is 40. The MLE for the mean will have small variance so should be ble to distinguish small variations in the means of X and Y
@snow verge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello. does log(A-B) have a direct formula?
i know that logA-logB can be written as log(A/B) but i don't think that's the case for log(A-B)?
is it not possible to just- write it as
log(A-B) = logA-logB??
no
may i please know why?
you should input some value of A and B and check for yourself using a calculator
okay... what if the question i have to solve has 'x' for an exponent instead...?
yk e^x=c=>logc=x
very much no
log(2-1) is not at all equal to log(2)-log(1) for instance
i see
can you show what question you're looking at
wait in this case is the answer not the same?
oh sorry nvm
Take the lcm between e^x and e^-x
taking logs right away won't help here
i would first multiply by 2 and in fact also by e^x on both sides
right, so e^x-e^-x = 2
and i should multiply that with e^x on both sides??
yes
yes but now simplify that
i'm a little clueless as to how to proceed; is there a formula i should be applying on the left hand side?
or is this where i use log?
Second terms cancels to become 1
i don't get it?
(e^-x) is basically 1/e^x
Do you see a potential for the formula (a - b)^2
yes?
We need to do that
okay
add -2e^x and +2 on both sides
Missing +2
Itâs not the right formula yet you need +1 not -1
why do we have to add the +2
noted
The formula for (a-b)^2 is a^2 - 2ab + b^2
Now youâll get (e^x - 1)^2 = 2
Square root both sides
(e^x-1) = square root of 2
okay
question; is it not possible for
(e^x - 1) = +sqrt(2) and -sqrt(2)?
oh nvm it seems log is undefined for negative numbers (i did not know that)
anyways, i have my answer now. thanks!! ^^
.close
Yea
Closed by @timid schooner
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please help me solve this :
@subtle marsh Has your question been resolved?
how to find |b|.|c| |a|.|b| and |a|.|c|
after that?
State the length of a and c vectors with alpha relatively
Plug into the last given info, thatâs all
Youâre just a step afar to the solution
Youâve conquered the difficult part, which is recognizing a, b, and c vectors are perpendicular to each others
@subtle marsh
thanks
Donât forget to close the channel if your doubts have been cleared
.close
Closed by @subtle marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185> help
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Hello guys I need help
Okay, you want to try and notice a pattern again?
oh sry
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #âhow-to-get-help for instructions).
yes
!occupied


