#help-27
1 messages · Page 299 of 1
so you're trying to get rid of the 4y^2 on the bottom now
you have to multiply the left term (that you're dividing the inside term with) to a certain number to be able to get rid of that y^4
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @velvet echo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Am i losing my mind or is this algebra just wrong?
context?
nevermind i cant do that
How has he factored that...
i don't see a problem with this frankly
yeah lol me neither. But its just the algebra of how my lecturer has factored the 3rd line
because if you expand out all the terms and recollect them you get that given result
You factor out -1 in 2nd line to get -r^2sin etc but you get A_+... -1

no it makes complete sense
im not fucking latexing that but it does distribute correctly
okay... then ive just lost my mind looking at this for centuries
question, where in the flying fuck did the $\theta(A_+^2)$ term go?
;(
no clue what that means so ill assume its relevant!
but yes, i am sanity checking myself and this does factor correctly (note that cos^2+sin^2=1)
Its $O(A^2_+) not theta. The terms get smaller so we approximate solution
yeah but i cant see how he goes from the first lot to the 2nd. Since he takes out a -1 from $(1-A_+\cos(wt)$ but ill just kms
SollyPolly
it looks like a theta wth
anyways yeah it makes sense since its big O notation blah blah blah
ye well lectuere a physist so
you can just remove it since it will become insignificant
!
ok fine ill latex it whatever
i feel bad for u man
nah its all good
ive got this
only need to get 26/100 on this exam to pass
then i can forget this module
💀
this statement is sending me in tears
$r^2\cos^2(\theta)+r^2\cos^2(\theta)A_+\cos(wt)+r^2\sin^2(\theta)-r^2\sin^2(\theta)A_+\cos(wt)$
;(
so that $r^2\cos^2(\theta)+r^2\sin^2(\theta)$ term simplifies to $r^2$
;(
👍
.close
Closed by @noble mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i thought i had to just subtract the two functions and then integrate?
how is that area?
you gave an anti derivative
find the area of the region between the curves
i thought i was doing this from my notes
yes that's correct but you need to determine a and b
you just gave an anti derivative
since they're not asking for the integral function of their difference, but the area in between
okay so there has to be a definit integral
okay how do i find a and b
when its not given
intersection of the curves
okay so i need to set each function to 0
no you’re finding where they intersect (here they intersect at the roots but this is not always the case)
you set the functions equal to each other
okay so generally how would i find where they intersect
x=x^(1/3)
And find roots
haha oops
x^3-x=0
x(x^2-1)=0
x=0
x=+-1
you don’t need to solve it for them
can u explain how to get this? i dont understand how the power 1/3 became 3
x = x^1/3 just cube both sides
Here is the solution.
what
wasn't that to find the bounds for the integral so that i could find the area?
yes but what can’t be negative?
the bounds? dont they have yo be positive if im finding the area between them?
Cubic root of x?
why?
you’re saying $\int_{-2}^{-1} x^2 \dd{x}$ is invalid?
knief
i dont know i just thought that was a rule when im getting the area between function?
i thought so
Why?
Only area itself can't be negative.
kind of... i thought that since u plug in the bounds when solving for area they couldnt be negative
the bounds simply define the region we’re considering (what interval/subset of the domain to integrate over)
For example you have area under x axis.
If you integrate it you will get negative number.
But area cannot be negative, so you multiply it by 1 or reverse boundaries.
so its -1 to 0 and 0 to 1?
or, change the sign of one of the regions if there is multiple, as is the case here
x^(1/3) Cannot be negative because of cubic root
note that we can’t just do $\int_{-1}^1 x - x^{\frac{1}{3}} \dd{x}$ here since this would give us zero (odd function)
knief
yep
that’s...quite the opposite.
x^(1/3) can take negative inputs.
Yes, sry.
what
you literally solved as if they did before
^ @serene zephyr
i remember that from my notes
which region do you think is negative?
this has no meaning
huh
Btw, you need to calculate from -1 to 0 and from 0 to 1 separately, otherwise you will get zero.
a better question is which function is greater than the other in the two regions
x^(1/3)
what
sure that’s for that region
x^(1/3) is upper function
it’s the opposite for the other region
well, it can be, since any function that is below the x-axis on an interval will technically have negative area (the point of the comment was to stimulate OP to realize which area to take the absolute value of)
Ah, yes, so x-x^(1/3) for -1 to 0.
you should be more precise so they understand what we’re really doing
the whole idea is "top - bottom"
so how do u find which region is on top then?
it’s better to understand that sometimes, when calculating, it will give negative inputs if you’re not working correctly, so this is to make sure OP understands that you need to take the absolute value of certain intervals in order to get the answer correct
if it has multiple regions
okay i think that i got confused while reading everything
Plot functions and see.
you can just plug in values, since both functions are one-to-one, for each interval
so like, x=-1/2 and x=1/2, respectively
But you should be able to plot them by yourself, especially basic ones.
sure
what exactly are you confused about?
and i’m sorry if i am bombarding too much information
its okay i just didnt know when we were talking about the functions vs the intervals
but im all good now i think
are you aware that for x in (0,1) x^{1/3} > x?
back to the question i plug in .5 for x into the origional functions?
to figure out which is on top?
that works yes but do you know the cube root of 0.5
yep
a better value would be something like 1/8 since it’s a perfect cube
you can easily cube both sides
^
taking the nth root for any natural number n > 1 of x in (0,1) will result in a number larger than x and i hope it’s clear why that is
mhm
ya
so 1/8 < 1/2
hence x^{1/3} > x in that interval
since we’ve already determined the points of intersection
it must be greater throughout the entire interval
now consider the other interval
-1 -> 0
what do you expect to happen?
you don’t even need to compute anything here
um would it switch?
because -1/8 is larger than -1/2
mhm
if you wanted to multiply the inequality you had by -1 it would work and you’d get that but what i was getting at was the absolute value of the nth root (take n to be odd here because we can use symmetry for the negative side) of x will be larger than the absolute value of x for x in (0,1)
hence since x is lower than cube root of x when they’re positive it means |x| < |x^1/3|
but we consider values that are more negative to be smaller
so x^1/3 will be below x in the interval (-1,0)
more negative
okay ya that makes sense
so does that mean from (-1.0) it is x-x^1/3 and from (0,1) its x1/3 -x
yes exactly
okay awesome
note that you don’t need to calculate both integrals
because of symmetry about the origin
since it’s odd
but its written like this?
don't think so.
Should be 1/4 and 1/4.
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
what did i miss in my work?
No, you plug 0 into both functions (x and x^(1/3)) and plug -1 into both and then subtract values.
(-1)^2 =?
yes
now you know the other region will have the same area
so just double it
or add them together
same thing
1/2
you’re welcome
Closed by @serene zephyr
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Boo
Uhh so say I have an odd prime p
Is it always true that p is a quadratic non residue mod p^2?
I think this is doable via something called jacobi symbols but idk anything about them
Found this on wikipedia
Apparently it referrences gauss's arithmetica but idk how to read latin
dont know anything about this, but I tried testing this out and, for 2 < n < 141, "there exists a number k such that k^2 = n mod n^2" only seems to be true for perfect square n
I didnt test higher than that for now
So meaning it isn't true for odd primes right
@finite briar Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@finite briar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what kinda justification is required here?
i mean asin(x) is 2pi-periodic
and tan(x) is pi-periodic
so f is 2pi-periodic
do i have to show smth else?
As long as there's a sort of LCM in their periods going on, it's periodic.
You can show it by dividing the periods by pi to get integers and then find the LCM of those integers and then multiply that by pi.
i mean isn't that exactly what i claimed
Yes, but it's a bit more detailed about why.
yeah i mean
sin(x + 2pik) = sin(x)
tan(x + pi n) = tan(x) = tan(x + 2pin)
but i think to be fair
u need more justification
like why period can't be less than 2pi
Yes, that's fine, but it doesn't show that that's the smallest combined period.
The LCM can do that.
some multiple of 2pi and pi has to coincide
and yes it's obvious
the lcm does that
but we still haven't showed
that is the smallest period
do we not have to?
Well, you have the smallest periods of the individual functions.
Then, you divide them by pi, take the LCM, and multiply it by pi, and then that will be the smallest period for the combination.
i mean the book shows that it is the smallest period
most of the time
after my-kinda justification
but i thought it was redundant
also brb
@thick schooner Has your question been resolved?
Suppose T is a period smaller than 2pi, then 2pi=kT for some natural k => T = 2pi/k, k \in {2, 3, ...} but it is manageable to check that no T of such form satisfies f(x + T) = f(x)
but is this required?
not necessarily. you can simply claim sin x has period 2pi, tan x has period pi, so f must have period lcm(1, 2) pi
complicated to claim that too
but since they have different periods maybe this is a possible result
otherwise subtracting two functions of the same period can get a function of smaller period
f(x) = (tan x)(2cos x - 1)
= (sec x/2)(tan x)(cos 3x/2)```
hmm? should work now :p
@thick schooner Has your question been resolved?
oh
maybe that's why they're checking
ok thx
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk how to factorise that
the 1/2 (156g square - 80gh + 15h square)
ok you prolly made some sort of mistake? its unfactorable
@heavy peak Has your question been resolved?
I think you miss the (11x-2y)(x+4y)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Send f to the left hand side, take reciprocal of the exponential function and integrate both sides
It's an exact differential
Haven’t learn integrals yet
Solving differential eqns without knowledge of integrals ?
Yeah I am using some kind of theorem
which theorem?
I think he means applying that exact differential thing!
Constant function theorem
let the man speak rather than speaking for him smh
and as you see, it is not what your misconception was
is that like f'(x) = 0 iff f(x) = constant?
I am translating give me a minute
👍
First one should be saying continuous not differentiable
okay
so we should probably find ourselves a constant function
we expect that $f(x) = x^2 e^{3x}$, so how about we try
[ g(x) = f(x) e^{-3x} - x^2? ]
aight
Yeah that propably works as I can see , but how should I know how to reform so it can work like that
well if $f(x) = x^2 e^{3x}$, then [ f(x) e^{-3x} - x^2 = 0 ]
so thats one of the things you should try
obviously there are other things to try
your first thought might be [ g(x) = f(x) - x^2 e^{3x} ] but if you try that, you'll see it doesnt work out as nicely
Yeah I mean it’s mostly experience I guess
one thing you could think about is like
i didnt like this option because it divides by 0 at x=0
Yeah X€R so wouldn’t work out well
if you'd just tried $g(x) = f(x)/e^{3x} = f(x) e^{-3x}$, that wouldve gotten you most of the way there though
I am getting a 2x as an answer from g’(x) and not a constant c as I should
Idk if I have made a mistake
Nvm I found the mistake e
@eternal aspen Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how else can i slolve this prob??
i tried two methods but its still showing incorrect
l nd n means the direction lines
So like (l, m, n) are direction ratios?
yess
direction cosines na
Alr got it
x coordinate is 5 not -5
Closed by @mortal aspen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
3√7 + 8√21
How do you add it?
nothing to "add" really, as both sqrt(7) and sqrt(21) are irrational
you could factor it if that's what you intend to do, though.
what remains unclear? c:
How?
@sand quarry
prime factorise 21
sqrt(21) = sqrt(3) * sqrt(7) if that is what you seek
Closed by @tulip halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how are you ever meant to do this without mathway?
whar is the question?
factor
ok
so you can see all three values have d^2 terms
and z^2 terms
so you factor those out first
right?
yes i see that
That's it.
wdym thats it?
i see how the z^2 would work after
but idk how to do it with the parentheses and stuff after that
OH wait
i think i maybe see
Are you not familiar with the distributive property?
so this is just the same
whats that
i have highschool diploma but this is some next level factoring
i only got basic factoring
maybe you are askimg how to factor the bracket?
like from parabola
a(b+c) = ab+ac
i know that
Then ab + ac = a(b+c) yeah?
nah i just dont know how to do these huge things, i got teached the product sum method
where you have
In your problem, a = d^2 z^2, b = z^3, c = d^3z^2 - 1
This isn't that complicated though
this is the only way i got it thought
and this is completely different from that
You just have a d^2 and z^2 in every term that you can pull out
ye i understand that question
but idk how i would do this
There's an f in every term you can pull out
Then it's just a quadratic
Not all cubics and higher are easy though
And quintics and higher can be actually impossible
idk how i would factor this more tho
i understand i just need to factor whats inside the brackets
but i have no idea how
i can only do this if the second term is a the sum and the third term is the product of the 2 factors
how do i do that tho
idk how to do it if its not whole numbers
Hmm? It's the same though
no
like i said i only got thought the product sum method
idk if thats what its called in english but
1/3+1/3 = 2/3 And 1/3*1/3 = 1/9
It's a little trickier when the leading coefficient isn't 1
So why not make it 1 by multiplying everything by 4?
OH WAIT I DID IT
Be sure to also pull out the 1/4 to outside of the brackets
ye
i got it
i figured it out
this also confuses me
there is literally like
nothing there
i dont get how thats even factorable
( z + sqrt 19 ) ( z - sqrt 19 )
ohhhh
ye ofc
bro
i thought i understood
then this came
this is apparnetly not it
💀
it needs to be more
ok i got it that was so hard
@mild crypt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mild crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to show that $\forall n \in\mathbb{N}:\frac{-2}{n^2+1}\neq 0$?
Slowaq
.close
Closed by @oblique rover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hii
for 3
|A-xI|=0
then solve for x which will be the eigenvalues
idk about eigenvectors :/
Oh.. ok thanks
Ok
Well, in Q2, you're given that for some nxn matrix, some row is full of 0s, right?
Yepp
Alright, let's forget for now about that
Suppose you're given a 4x4 matrix, what would you do to calculate its determinant?
As in diagonalize it and calculate the determinant of the diagonal matrix?
Hm, well, that's not what I was expecting
What theorems/propositions have you got to work with?
.close
Closed by @grizzled wyvern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find B? I don't understand the circle theorem. Please help
they contain the same inscribed angle.
also, let me draw something real quick, to get an ease of notation.
alright
I always see you here
Then hes a nice guy
?
sorry for the bad handwriting; im doing this on pc.
I see you often in this doscord server you must be a nice guy
@errant arch does this make sense?
ah.
well, what did your teacher give you?
just like the theory but no examples on how to find the angles
Someone help 🙏
@errant arch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @errant arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just to check the general form of solutions to this ODE
y'-4y=x-2 is y'=-(x/4)+(7/16)+Ce^(4x)?
Closed by @knotty sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im so confused rn. i have a calc test tomorrow but idk anything about this unit everything looks so confusing. ive been sick this past like week
have you began solving it?
not yet, im kinda lost
the only thinf they give us are on the problem, i have no idea the dimensions of it
ohh
y= (6-x)/2
and see if we can write it in terms of just one
wait lemme do that
The maximum area of a rectangle inscribed in a triangle is 1/2 area of the triangle, am I right?
Then the area of the triangle is (3*6)/2
Since then then the maximum area of the rectangle is 4.5 ???
sure but i think this is for a calculus class and seeing as they’re struggling with the process of optimization it’s probably worth the practice anyway
but yes
@brisk bobcat Has your question been resolved?
It also could be proved using calculus right
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yeah 8C2 is correct
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
the empty set isnt in every set. the condition for part (b) is that the pair of subsets don't share elements in common 
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @merry talon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve for e)?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm confused with b)
What are the elements I'm adding/multiplying together?
I know with mod m the elements are 1,2,3,4,5,....,m-1
@undone comet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\int_{0}^{3} \int_{\sqrt{x/3}}^{1} \frac{dy dx}{y^4+1}$
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
What a wonderful world!
so I want to change the bounds of integration gere
sorry
rather the order
so I have $0<x<3$
What a wonderful world!
and $\sqrt{x/3}<y<1$
What a wonderful world!
when I switch the order, I find that the bounds of x remain the same
and 1<\sqrt{x/3{<1
which is sus
have you made a drawing
yes
then I dont know how you got 1 < sqrt(x/3) < 1, in particular something independent of y
the horizontal line enteres at y =\sqrt{x/3} and exists at y=1
oops
really confused
if you pick some y, eg y=0.5, then which x are allowed?
graphically, you have the horizontal line y=0.5 and ask yourself what the intersection with your shaded area is
Okay
so if we consider horizontal lines intersecting the region
the enter at x=0
and exit at x=3y^2
is that right
Now what
so I have $\int_{a}^{b} \int_{0}^{3y^2} \frac{dx dy}{y^4+1}$
What a wonderful world!
$0<x<3, 0<x/3<1, 0<\sqrt{\frac{x}{3}}<1$
What a wonderful world!
What a wonderful world!
Is this right
,w is is \int{0}^{1} \int{0}^{3y^2} \frac{dxdy}{ y^4+1} = \int{0}^{3} \int{\sqrt{x/3}}^{1} \frac{dy dx}{y^4+1}
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
<@&286206848099549185>
@lost laurel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
anyone can help on how i can like do the graph
like how do i graph this graph
help me please
.close
Closed by @frail ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i can help, if you're still willing.
.reopen
✅
like the graph
like how did they get that particular graph from the data
like ik how to do they asyptotes and why they are there
its just the curve thingies
you create what fits from the data.
yeah but like do i just make a curve that connects to the points?
do i like make curves that connects to the intercepts?
i suppose, but i don't really think it would matter, so long as you just graph one point in between each asymptote.
but do make sure, if you want full marks, to graph the characteristics given
okya
because those are the most obvious things to do
Closed by @frail ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question
If I am on a train with a constant velocity
And walk in the same direction as travel with a constant velocity
Would the momentum of the train change?
Compared to if I was sitting stil?
@knotty orchid Has your question been resolved?
veeeery slightly
How would you express that in a formula?
total momentum: m_train * v_train + m_you * v_you = P
so when youre not moving
P=m_train*v_train
when you start moving, P stays the same, so m_train * v_train1 = m_train * v_train2 + m_you * v_you
v_train1 is the speed before you moved
v_train2 is the speed after you moved
Closed by @knotty orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Wait, but if I sitt stil in this equation, then my mass is canceled
yes, because your speed is 0, and anything *0 =0
if you sit still, your momentum is 0
But my mass is still in the train
Like
Let's say the entire train satt still
(Pasangers)
200 people
80 kg each
That's 16 tonns
I find it hard to believe that if they sitt still on the train
That their mass just disapears
Right?
Bonk
and you are confusing a few things
I don't see why that would change it 😭
when finding the total momentum you take the whole mass
Yeah
so train and everyoneone on it
Yeah
since momentum is conserved, if you start moving, you "take away" momentum from the train and use it for yourself
Yeah
do you have an example question?
we need to look at our reference point
is our reference moving along with the train or a spectator watching the train go past
if its moving with the train, if everyone is sitting still, momentum is 0
if its watching the train, then the real speed is train speed+walking speed
What effect does the pasangers moving have on the train
Yeah that was what I was thinking originaly
But does the total stay the same then?
momentum is conserved, yes
Closed by @knotty orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$z = arcsin(x-y)\newline x=3t \newline y=4t^2$
I need to use partial differentiation to show that...
$\frac{dz}{dt}=\frac{3}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}$
I tried using this formula:
$$\frac{dz}{dt} = \frac{\partial z}{\partial x} \frac{dx}{dt}+\frac{\partial z}{\partial y} \frac{dz}{dt}$$
But I got...
$$\frac{3-8t}{\sqrt{1-(x-y)^2}}$$
which doesn't seem to prove it
radian
You don't really need partial differentiation here, you can just get z as a function of t
Also the required derivative just looks wrong
Yours is correct
That's what I was thinking too
Then I ran it through chatgpt to tell me I got stuck and it got stuck too
.close
Closed by @rich parrot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
its negative for sure
to goes to negative infinity
cuz
Instead of $\int_{0}^9 \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}-3} dx$
kronium_
we can interchange the values
that gives us
$\int_0^9 -\frac{1}{3-\sqrt{x}} dx$
but don't I have to find the anti-derivative to be able to say anything like that?
and 3 - sqrt(x) approaches 0 I think?
This isn't terribly tough to integrate btw
Play around with a couple substitutions (hint- x=u^2)
as $x --> 9$, $3 - $\sqrt{x} --> 0$
Therefore $\frac{1}{3-\sqrt{x}} --> \infty$
kronium_
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
.
nvm solved it
@velvet rose Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @velvet rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help with this question: f,g,k,h are different isometries if gof=koh then fog=hok
?
hello
help me solve it
disprove or prove
prove fs
wdym
Have you tried it with some examples in 2d?
So what does that tell you about g and f?
what
You've got gof = koh by definition
You've got koh = hok
And you've got hok = gof by assumption (if you want to do it by contradiction)
Sorry hok = fog
but gof is not neccesarly eqale to fog
Do you understand proof by contradiction?
And do you understand why IF you assume the statement you're trying to prove, then gof = fog?
but the claim is false
I'll take that as a no then
is that true?
One way of proving that a statement is false is by assuming it to be true, then finding a contradiction
So for example, if you wanted to prove that "10000 is the largest number" was false, you could assume it's true, then show that "10001 > 10000"
Which would be a contradiction, showing that the original statement was false
It's a bit contrived, but does that make sense?
yes but u can give an example to the 4 isometris and show that the condition is true buts the claim is false
I'm not gonna give you an example but I'll help you find one
i didnt find an example i tried
If you assume that the claim is true, then since it applies to all possible g, f, h, k, it means that gof = fog for all f and g
So all you need to do is find f and g such that fog isn't equal to gof
Then that will disprove the statement
Does that make sense?
and h and k
what is h=1 its not an isometry
Yes but that doesn't really get you anywhere I don't think
I could be wrong
Which isometries do you know?
there are only 5 no?
i know identity ,rotation ,transformation, mirroring, offset mirroring
sry id its not the exact name its google translate
Ah okay I see what you mean
Yeah that sounds right
Those are 5 families of isometries rather than individual transformations but yes I think that's all of them
How about you let f be a "transformation" (in english we call them translations) and let g be a rotation
And see if fog = gof
but transformation in how much and rotation by how much
ok
Also in case you're wondering, we call "mirroring" reflections
In relation to which straight line the transformation and whether the axis of rotation should be on the line
Again just pick something easy
i called the line l
Translate 1 unit to the right, and rotate 180 degrees
Yes the origin
origin?
Are you doing isometries in one dimension?
wdym
Are you doing isometries on numbers on the number line?
I assumed you were doing it on points in a plane
no
Okay good, that would've been a bit weird
I drew two lines to represent points (x,y) on a plane, that you can apply isometries to
Anyway so you've got f and g now
So pick a point and apply fog and gof to that point
fog=!gof
It's like I was saying back here
If that statement is true, then
Let k be the identity, so hok = koh
Then gof = koh = hok = fog
So gof = fog
but why
Which part doesn't make sense?
from what i understood fog=!gof an bc gof=koh and k is identity gof=hok so thats wht fog=!hok bc fog=!gof
Not really no
There's a false statement in there whatever h is
So you assumed a statement and concluded a contradiction
thats what i said
So the statement has to be false
Yeah sorry I was agreeing with you
no
but gof suposed to be eqale to koh
ye tytytytytytytyty u saved me
Np
gof is offset mirroring
Make sure you really understand it though, it shouldn't seem like I pulled it from nowhere
It's actually another rotation I'm pretty sure
Just a different one
gof and fog are both rotations but with different centers
Yes but that's only in one dimension
In two dimensions or more they're different
If you do the rotation first then the translation, then it's actually equivalent to a rotation by 180 degrees around the point 0.5 to the right of 0
It doesn't look like it, but it is actually a rotation
It's definitely not a reflection
The point (0.5, 0) goes to itself, which you never get with offset reflections
But it's g first
Yes, g is a rotation isn't it?
Yea
And f is a translation
So fog (so g first) is a 180 degree rotation around (0.5, 0)
And gof is a 180 degree rotation around (-0.5, 0)
How
Idk how to prove it
I'm sure you'll get to it quite soon
Dw about it for now
It doesn't really matter for the question you were stuck on
Didn't learn to write it like this
I was just correcting you because you said something wrong
How are you writing it? Sorry
0.5,0
Okay
What is h
So if you work out fog on that point, you'll just get that same point
Wdym?
h is just gof
h doesn't really matter
It doesn't matter what fog and gof are, the only thing that matters for that proof is that they aren't the same
How can I prove that gof=!fog
You managed to prove it back here
So however you did it then
Otherwise you just have to find any point x such that gof(x) != fog(x)
I didn't really prove it I found a point A that (fog)(A)=!(gof)(A) is that enough?
Yes that proves they aren't the same
@opaque skiff Has your question been resolved?
@opaque skiff Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Yeah looks good
I looked at isometries in lots of detail in my 2nd and 4th years of university
in what university
I can't recommend any books about it that are suitable for your level, but the course textbook for my 2nd year course was the Miles Reid textbook "geometry and topology" and it has some great chapters about that type of thing
But it might be a tough read
I'd rather not say, I quite like my anonymity
?
oh oh
Nothing personal
its fine
Most universities will have a course that covers that though
Oh you're in first year?
ye
How are you at school and university at the same time?
i got in
Interesting
I've not heard of that before
But you're not a full time student presumably?
but i can
@opaque skiff Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @opaque skiff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
