#help-27
1 messages · Page 287 of 1
ohh
okay wait
i substitute the value of b in this?
or should i do a different one
like uh
oh nvm still the same
which is?
i substituted the value of b^2 into the equation
idk if it's right
(a+c)^2 + c^2 = 2a^2?
@devout trench Has your question been resolved?
yo @solar goblet am i right?
i've been watching spiderman
lmao ghosted me
my take is 45 degrees
idk if i'm wrong
hi
oops sorry i was playing pjsk
yes you are on the right track
2ac + 2c^2 = a^2
now calculate c in terms of a or b
lmao i'm still watching spiderman
then what
@devout trench Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Having trouble conceptually / visually understanding how moving a negative exponent to the numerator and vice versa denominator becomes positive with integer #'s
u mean a^(-n) = 1/aⁿ ?
Yup
just think harder
hint||: multiplicative inverses ||
So essentially if I have $a^n$ , what's its multiplicative inverse ?
ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know
$a^-n$
Lupa
ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know
ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know
(you may want to talk about $a^0$ first)
SWR
Fair, but I pressume OP know that that is defined to be 1
Now, multiplicative inverses are unique
what does that tell you
Not sure on this one
1
recall $\frac{a}{b}$ means I'm dividing a by b
ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know
Closed by @plain lance
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is a physics problem indeed, but the work is mostly mathematical and it revolves around a few formulas from Ohm's law on a simple circuit
- A battery powers a resistor with an electric current of intensity I = 24A. If the resistance is increased by f_1 = 25%, the current intensity decreases by f_2 = 20%. Determine:
a. The new value of the electric current intensity in the circuit if the resistance is decreased by f_1 = 25%.
b. By what percentage does the voltage across the resistor change in the case where the resistance decreases compared to the case where it increases?
c. By what percentage does the resistance of the conductor change if the temperature varies by Δt=80°C, given that the thermal coefficient of resistivity is α=6*10^(-4)°C^(-1) and the initial resistance was at a temperature of 0°C?
which question are you stuck at?
Honestly, a
well you know that the battery is always the same so V is constant
Yup
therefore IR must be equal to IR after reduced
So I1R1 = I2R2 and we just adapt to f_1?
well im not good at this so ill let someone else help
that would be my guess
@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?
@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?
@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?
@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?
V=IR
V_1=24R_1
V_2=24R_2
(V_2-V_1)/V_1=25/100
(R_2-R_1)/R_1=20/100
find R_1 interms of R_2 and V_1 interms of V_2 no?
whats the problem
i think the have explained enough
@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @naive mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what kind of curve can i use to fit into this distribution?
i tried gamma and it didnt converge
gaussian area, gaussian amp, bigaussian, lorantz all look weird
can you tell how you generated it?
@karmic hill Has your question been resolved?
poisson maybe?
lognormal?
@karmic hill Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I asked chatgpt how to find the inverse of a 3x3 but it's giving me a long method, but this question is only worth 3 marks
Is there a quicker way?
Don't ask ChatGPT for answers, currently AI is not that advanced and can give wrong answers confidently
Ahhhh yesss
I remember this
Thank you all for your inputs
.close
Closed by @austere yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\mathbf{t}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/2 \ 1 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}, \quad
\mathbf{t}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 2 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}, \quad
\mathbf{t}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}$
Task Bot
Task Bot
btw there is an obvious linear combination between them
t_1 = 1/2 t_2 + 1/2 t_3
yeah these vectors are linearly dependent
since we can write t_1 as a linear combination of t_2 and t_3, they are linearly dependent
where does this come from tho
This
Task Bot
Why do you say $t_1=-2t_3$
Eternal Night
and where does this come from
This is wrong
From this
then it's wrong
Bruh
you can verify
I think I didn't make any mistakes
$-2 \begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 1 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} -2 \times 1 \ -2 \times 0 \ -2 \times 1 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} -2 \ 0 \ -2 \end{pmatrix}$
Herels
that thing is not t_1
Ops
I think I asked the question wrong
Sorry
$\mathbf{t}_1 \begin{pmatrix} 1/2 \ 1 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}+ \quad
\mathbf{t}_2 \begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 2 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}+ \quad
\mathbf{t}_3 \begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 0 \end{pmatrix}$
Task Bot
@zenith jacinth
now it makes sense
Task Bot
t_1 = -2 t_3
t-1 = - 2 t_2
t_1 + t_2 + t_3 = 0
thats what im getting
Yes
t_1 t_2 and t_3 aren't equal to 0, so the vectors aren't linearly independant
So there is no basis for the image of f?
I'm following this
For vectors to be a basis they need to be:
linear independent
span the subspace
And the first point comes off as false to me
well, yea since we can write this :
$$\begin{pmatrix} 1/2 \ 1 \ 1 \end{pmatrix} = \frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 2 \ 1 \end{pmatrix} + \frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}$$
Herels
the first vector can be write as a linear combination of the two others
would make sense that the other two vectors themselves formed a basis
since they are linearly independent
@small urchin Has your question been resolved?
@small urchin Has your question been resolved?
A^-1=adj(A)/det(A)
2t_1 -t_2=t_3
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What do y’all get
I got 68 but I feel like that’s wrong
@patent geyser Has your question been resolved?
You're right
You're right that you're wrong.
I got 32.
How
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
How?
Are you 100% sure
Maybe there’s two solutions
Maybe it’s 68 or 32
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
oh
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do we know its a rotation of 120
@old jungle Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @old jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Annie and Xenas each arrive at a party at a random time between $2:00$ and $4:00$. Each stays for $45$ minutes and then leaves. What is the probability that Annie and Xenas see each other at the party?
Ryxo
I’m supposed to use geometric probability somehow but idk how
@ocean gale Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ocean gale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone say me the answer for this question?
so according to me the answer should be (d) 0
because
my teacher said that we will not consider the edges with directions while calculating the degree
so can someone please say the correct thing?
please tag me if anyone answers
in this question they havent mentioned anything about whether we have to calculate indegree or outdegree
if it was indegree then the answer was supposed to be 1 and similarly for the case of outdegree
but how do we calculate the degree?
<@&286206848099549185>
afaik if they specified indegree or outdegree then you'd consider the directionality, but if they just say degree then you'd treat it like any other graph
as in just the number of adjacent edges
regardless of directionality
so what should the answer be in this case? 2?
that's what i would think
Closed by @tender seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
- The expression: “ a | b^b | (-c) => a|c “ is true, sometimes true, false
seems true,
you don't even need to use b to show it's true
yea i also cant find an example where its wrong
a | -c means there's some k with ak = -c
so a(-k) = c
so a divides c
Closed by @ripe plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Integration by parts, correct?
We would have to take 1/(cos x)^2 as the part to take the antiderivative of
bruh
as im explaining it to myself im understanding it
.close
Closed by @void oar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
et donc?
ouf, mais non, j'ai écris les suites en faux
Pour la deux
je me suis trompé
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Refais en un
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont know what to do
to a certain extent
i feel like they just asked me the same question thrice
,tex .diff rules
but just worded differently
riemann
idk Leibniz but the rest im familiar with
Just use power rule then
do i have to say for x smaller than 1 the derivative is 2x
and for bigger than 1 the derivative is also 2x
Yes
damn
and for b do i use the definition of derivative
f(x) - f(c) / x-c and x approaches c
for both cases, 2x when x approaches 1 is 2
is that it?
Missing parentheses but sure that works
what are those
Read b) and compare to the definition of derivative in your book/notes
c should be inferred by matching the definition
im lost
i get the definition but how does this correlate with c
Oh you don't need the definition of derivative for b)
just plug in 2x for f'(x) into the limit
can we do
f(1) = 1
and lim x goes to 1 of x^2 + 1 = 2
so there is a jump
and not continuos
not continuos on 1=> not differentiable on 1
That works yea
@blazing crest Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @blazing crest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the wording on this ambiguous?
aren't they asking for maximum spanning (length) interval
i actually don't know how to phrase it
they are
but would you say this question is posed well?
i'm guessing they want 1 < x < 7 but okay i'm more concerned about how they phrased the question
it would be better if they said
If the possible values of x lie in (a, b) then find b-a
it does
if someone didn't know triangle inequality
they'd understand it?
i guess maybe yeah
i feel like they should just ask for the maximum and minimum possible values of x
@thick schooner Has your question been resolved?
it doesn’t?
yeah i think that’s what they’re going for
there’s also the bias that i kinda know what they’re testing
i wanted to clarify whether the way they’ve asked the question could be handled by someone unfamiliar with this topic
it's absurd
it sure is poorly phrased
@thick schooner Has your question been resolved?
alright thanks guys
Closed by @thick schooner
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
i’ll take a look
I think I know the answer but not sure how to articulate this
problem is wrong
Nope
impossible
Why?
This is possible the answer i got is 30
Yup, that's the answer
answer is 30???
1/(1/5 - 1/6)
i was messing around in geogebra
and constructed this
A is (0, 160)
decimals might be off but there is a triangle that satisfies the problem around here
Closed by @waxen crag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
can you construct the triangle and send it
please
turns out it actually looks like that
A and C do not lay on rational coordinates
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How’d you do this?
@sand haven Has your question been resolved?
@sand haven Has your question been resolved?
why not solved then?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where does the 2root2 over 3 come from?
sin x =1/3
Pro_Hecker
@harsh drum Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @harsh drum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $G$ be an abelian (commutative)$^{}$ group and $n \in \mathbb{N}.\$
Show that the map [ \Phi_n : G \to G, \quad \Phi_n(u) := u^n ] is a group-homomorphism.
$\ \ \textbf{Proof.}\$
Let $a,b \in G.\$
Then [ \Phi_n(ab) = (ab)^n \overset{}{=} a^nb^n = \Phi_n(a)\Phi_n(b) \quad \text{for all } a,b \in G. ]
Hence $\Phi_n$ is a group - homomorphism.$\ \$
Which elements of $G$ form the kernel of the map $\Phi_n? \$
Proceed to give a non-trivial group $G$ and natural numbers $n_1, n_2 > 1 \$ such that $\Phi_{n_1}$ is $\textbf{ an isomorphism }$ and $\Phi_{n_2}$ is $\textbf{not an isomorphism.} \$
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
I need help on how to tackle the next part with the kernel and isomorphism stuff
My problem is I don't know whether G is finite or not too
And I am afraid I would need to do cases
The kernel is [ \ker(\Phi_n) := {u \in G \mid u^n = e, : n \in \mathbb{N} } ] where $e$ denotes the neutral element of $G.$
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
you are allowed to choose the group G for your examples
Without any more info about G it is fine to keep the kernel non specific
So before I start, I choose an abelian group and then proceed my work from there?
For this you can just choose a G
For this you gave the answer as specific as is possible without more information about G
So I literally just write down the definition of the kernel
well no
You specified that the elements have to be to the power of n and be equal to the identity
instead of saying
the kernel of f is all u for which f(u) = e
you say
ok i get it
the kernel of f is all u for which u^n = e
ok
good
you know you remember yesterday
where we specified n
like n = ord(a)k, k in N or something like that
That works if the order of a is finite
@faint gorge Has your question been resolved?
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
I hope this is fine
Closed by @faint gorge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,, 19^{290} \overset{37}{\equiv} : ?
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
I am kind of clueless how to approach this
37 is prime
you should try and use fermat's little theorem here
ok will
@faint gorge Has your question been resolved?
28
I spent so much time cant believe it I hate numbers
It's not even about being genius
[ 19^{290} = 19^{36 \cdot 8} \cdot 19^2 = \underbrace{(19^{37-1})^8}_{\overset{37}{\equiv} 1} \cdot 19^2 = 361 = 37 \cdot 9 + 28 \overset{37}{\equiv} 28 ]
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
.close
Closed by @faint gorge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone?
group terms with common factors
the mark scheme grouped it like this
but that doesnt make sense to me considering it grouped the ABC term twice
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just curious on what the optimal approach for questions regarding permutations and combinations is.
Also I'd like to understand multinomial expansions and how to solve questions such as:-
the remainder of (7^2022 + 3^2022)÷5
Last digit of 3^104
Last two digits
My teachers done something like (10-1)^52
Binomial expanded and I don't know what after. No idea why though
i would try something like
10^x gives you 0 in the units place thats why they do that
so essentially only the last digit matters
I could also use some kind of pattern could I not?
this method is quite interesting though
3^2 has last digit as 9, 3^3 has 7, 3^4 has 1, 3^5 has 3 again
Yeaaaah
and 104 is 4k type so it will be 1
$7^{2022}+3^{2022}=\left(7^4\right)^{505} 7^2 + \left(3^4\right)^{505} 3^2 \equiv 1^{505} 4 + 1^{505} 4\ (\textrm{mod}\ 5)\equiv 3\ (\textrm{mod}\ 5)$
can I use that for last two digits?
Also does the method we're talking about work for say 10-2 or 9-3? Or is it valid only for this situation?
Axe
What'd you do after the second part
look at the powers of 7 mod 5:
7 is 2
multiply 2 by 7 to get 14 which is 4
multiply 4 by 7 to get 28 which is 3
multiply 3 by 7 to get 21 which is 1
so powers of 7 go in a cycle: {2, 4, 3, 1}
and 7^4 is 1
so u just replace 7^4 with 1 in the equation
you can use bt for the last 2
I'll read this tomorrow morning I'm so sorry
Thank you so much both of you
@undone sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Aaa
I was trying to find derivative df/dx of f(x) = sqrt (x) by using geometry
So if u make a square with sides sqrt (x), the area of the square is x
So if u increase the sides by a little amount (df), we wanna know how much we increase the area (dx)
So we added df.(sqrt(x)) + df.(sqrt(x)) + df^2 which is equal to dx
But df is approaching 0, not dx, and idk what to do
May anyone help please?
uhm
i dont even understand what you are trying to do.
Hmhmhm
Idk how i can explain in a different way
Yep
try rearranging the above equation to get d(sqrt(x))/dx
with the usual observation that (d something)^2 is very small and can be neglected haha
indeed
I dont think it could be ignored but idk
well you don't know why because it's not rigorous, it's a physicist-style argument
to understand why you need to formulate it properly in terms of limits
Breh
I would understand it if you had dx / df
Then df approaches 0 and u can eliminate everything that has df
Can you? Please
you want me to write down the limit you need to evaluate?
I did not learn limit so idk
d.sqrt(x) -> 0 and (d.sqrt(x))² goes faster to zero
oh well then it won't help you if i do that
Indeed but...
without limit its the idea to have in mind
Thats not so rigorous
but dx is the thing you're making small here, right?
otherwise i don't know any sol without this
No
it is, if you're finding df/dx
Yeah
which is your goal
But df is the small thing
they're both small
rearrange your equation to get it in the form df/dx instead of dx/df
Df is the one approaching 0
they're both approaching 0
that's how derivatives work
you want to find out what limit their ratio approaches
Hmmmm
Thats true since dx has df multiplying it
So it also approaches 0
So can i find dx / df and then do 1 / it?
yw
I still wont close cuz i might need help still lol
sure
So dx = 2.sqrt(x).df + df^2, but saying that df^2 is perfectly equal to 0 because df approaches 0 does not seem rigorous
So we find dx/df = 2sqrt(x) + df. Since df approaches 0, 2sqrt(x) + df approaches 2sqrt(x). So df/dx will approach 1/(2sqrt(x))
@upbeat stone Has your question been resolved?
Is this correct?
@upbeat stone Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

Ok
well for a cant you take x=2^2013 -1
Lmao this was my primary school task…gosh I miss so much that book.
if you take the mod that gives -1^(some massive odd number+1 mod 2^2013
-1+1=0 mod 2^2013 so its divisible
Can't we use mathematical induction?
please enlighten me
heres for the first few terms:
the smallest x for any n i will express in (n,x)
(1,1)
(2,9)
(3,7)
(4,6)
(5,5)
(6,5)
(7,4)
(8,4)
(9,4)
(10,4)
(11,4)
(12,4)
(13,4)
(14,3)
(15,3)
(16,3)
assuming desmos isnt bugging cause the numbers are massivr
time to learn better tools
dpes modulsr aritmethic break at e31
ok fair
like i can code 🙏
learn it
let me try by proving specifically for 2013
@solid osprey Has your question been resolved?
ok i coded it in python and it only showed 1,3,5 being strong i think the other numbers (if they are even strong) has too big of an x as it halted
I've done my calculations. But I have to get ready for work.
So I'll be able to explain in the afternoon or evening.
I can send you my rough work though
alright
sorry man i have no idea what im looking at
@solid osprey Has your question been resolved?
you want to find y so that 2^n|(y^ny + 1), hence we must also have 2^n|(y^{2ny} - 1)
now you can apply euler's theorem mod 2^n
not sure if this is enough, but it's where i would start
???
eulers totient theorem?
yeah
sorry, should be 2^n, not 2^y
2^n and 2ny isnt coprime tho
what does euler's theorem say
if a and n are coprime then a^totient(n)=1 mod n
yeah, so why is it relevant if 2^n and 2ny aren't coprime
??
where'd this come from
are you trying to cite euler's theorem?
you need y and 2^n to be coprime for euler's theorem, not 2^n and 2ny
you always have y coprime to 2^n since otherwise we definitely have that 2^n does not divide y^{ny} + 1
oh ok
im o sure y^{2ny}=1 mod 2^y, by eulers 2ny is a multiple of 2^(y-1), ny=2^(y-2), since y is coprime to n then n=k*2^(y-2)
or am i stupid
wait
why are you claiming that 2ny is a multiple of 2^y-1
2^y-1 isn't necessarily the order of y mod 2^y
yeah, but that doesn't make it the order (least number k so that y^k = 1 mod 2^y)
or is it the opposite
if the order was that, then yeah i would agree
we don't know either way
all we can say is that both 2^n | y^{2^(n-1)} -1, and that 2^n | y^{2ny}-1
yeah, but we don't know what the order is
hm
the way to proceed is that this tells us that $2^n | y^{gcd(2ny, 2^{n-1})} -1$
Bair
since $o_{2^n}(y) | gcd(2ny, 2^{n-1})$
Bair
how can you say y^gcd(2ny,2^(n-1))-1 is divisible by 2^n
if $m|a^k-1$, then $o_m(a) | k$
Bair
so if $m|a^{\alpha} - 1$, and $m|a^{\beta} - 1$, then $o_{m}(a)|\alpha$ and $o_{m}(a)|\beta$, hence $o_m(a)|\gcd(\alpha, \beta)$
Bair
o
alr so gcd(2ny,2^(n-1))=2*gcd(n,2^(n-2)) as y is coprime to 2^n

$o_{2^n}(y)\mid 2\gcd(n,2^{n-2})$
skissue.in.a.teacup
@solid osprey Has your question been resolved?
yep, maybe you can let $n = 2^p \cdot q$, so then $o_{2^n}(y) \mid 2^{p+1}$
Bair
so o(y) = 2^k for some k <= p+1
actually it seems like we need something more here :(
the other idea was to do some sort of expansion with the binomial theorem
so could try that
@solid osprey Has your question been resolved?
idts
so we only need to deal with the m = odd case for part b

the easiest way i can think of to do part b is lifting the exponent lol
but i think basically the idea of the solution is to "prove" lifting the exponent without directly quoting it
(so factorise it)
errrrrr so like
y^ym+1^ym=(y+1)(y^(ym-1)-y^(ym-2)+y^(ym-3)-.....+1)?
wait wrong var
do you want to do like v_2(something)>=m or smth?
thats the only lte usage that makes sense to me
yeah
what can you say about your other bracket?
so 2|y+1=>y=1 mod 2 (duh)
y^(ym-1)-y^(ym-2)+y^(ym-3)-...+1=y^2m=m=1 mod 2
so y^ym+1^ym=y+1 mod 2
well all the prime factors of 2s are contained in y+1
so in order to have 2^m divide y^(ym) + 1, 2^m divides y+1
so you can finish
(this is basically you prove LTE btw)
whar (note i have no idea how wiki makes the jump from the factor to proving v_p(x^n+y^n)=v_p(x+y))
v_2(y^ym+1^ym)=v_2(y+1)>=m
well as in for a smaller example
y^3 + 1 = (y+1)(y^2 - y + 1)
y^2 - y + 1 is odd
so if 2^n divides y^3 + 1, 2^n divides y+1
Closed by @solid osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
nw!
mr/ms/smthelse ly
(but yeah this was just to prove LTE basically in case u didn't want to just quote LTE, in a contest u can just quote LTE)
national contest?
yeah
for any contest, as long as u say LTE or lifting the exponent, it'll be fine
hype, so hype
are there any well known ""lemma""'s that i can use without proving it
i mean as long as the proofs of the theorems you use for contests aren't crazy, then as long as u quote it properly, u can use anything
(so i'd try to avoid stuff like Mihalescu's theorem/Catalan conjecture)
(i think that's the only one lol)
cataland opening?
no it's the x^y - a^b = 1
:p wb the zsigmondy
zsigmondy is fine
for bigger theorems, if you use them i'd try to make sure you quote them properly (just so whoever marks your work knows u aren't bluffing)
you may want to avoid using big theorems like these when u do practice problems but that's up to you
agh i wanted to ask something but i forgor
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this which approach should I use
@flint obsidian Has your question been resolved?
@flint obsidian Has your question been resolved?
can this be done using an example?
@flint obsidian Has your question been resolved?
how?
well, the simplest way would be to brute-force compute the determinant
if you dont wanna die computing it tho, you would replace one of the lines or columns by the sum of all 4 lines or columns as first step, then dividing the determinant in two using their properties
I did not get how, I mean which operation would I use do so
what, to brute force it? or with properties?
i'm gonna call a1, a2, a3 and a4, a b c d for simplicity (loading mspaint:)
i'd start like that
then on both, i'd substract the first row from the other 3
that should simplify the determinant quite a lot
okay so you firstly added 4 to the first column right? and then using properties you separated the first column into two
right?
no
.
if you add a linear combination of the other columns to a column, the determinant is not modified
on this case, to column 1, i added column 2, column 3 and column 4
can you write the actual operation for me please? Other 3 means you would sum R2,R3,R4 first and then substract it to row 1? like R1 -> R1 - (R2+R3+R4)?
what does ' this refers though?
honestly it's probably not the approach *i* would use on a test, but it's one of the recommended ones.
I would most likely only go, from the original, Rn'=Rn-R1 and then bruteforce it
I see I also thought of doing substracting R1 from R2,R3,R4 and then taking a1 common from column 1 but That approach did not work
or maybe I did mistake somewhere calculating it
you dont have a1 as common factor on column 1, if you do that
because the first element is (1+a1), while the others are (-a1)
yeah that's where I messed up lol
I am learning maths again after 3-4 years, now even I forgot the basics of it
I took a1 common from 1+a1 too
wait which grade math is this
where i live this is taught on the last year before uni
its my uni last year
but its actual 12th grade maths
I was a commerce main thats why after 10th never touched maths
@flint obsidian Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
beggining of last line why do we have a seperate integral for just e^u?
Because the integrated integral treats other variables as constants
int int f(u) g(v) dudv = int f(u) du * int g(v) dv
Closed by @forest palm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am pretty sure about this being 4, but why?:
a = 2²⁰¹¹ + 2⁻²⁰¹¹
b = 2²⁰¹¹ - 2⁻²⁰¹¹
what is a² - b²
what do you mean by indice form
ye but for a^2 pls
also this is b, not a
(2^(2011)+2^(-2011))^2
sorry
use the diffrence of squares no?
OH YEA
i was just gonna get them to expand and cancel out like terms
but thats probs better lol
and that goes like...
both works
a^2-b^2 = (a+b)(a-b)
lmao
anyway, try this and youll get your answer
and how do I start solving a (or b)
nah, just sub your values of a and b in
a and b are given
This form just happens to be much easier to compute
(due to a lot of things canceling)
so its like (2^(2011)+2^(-2011) + 2^(2011)-2^(-2011)) * (2^(2011)+2^(-2011) - 2^(2011)-2^(-2011))
oh
this is wrong
a bit
the last term souldnt be -2^(-2011), it should be +2^(-2011)
Instead of writing out 2^2011 and 2^(-2011) let's write c and d
So we have a = c + d, b = c - d
yes
So a + b = 2c and a - b = 2d, yes?
yea
Additionally, we have d = 1/c
So a^2 - b^2 = (a+b)(a-b)
Then what?
In terms of just c and d
2c*2d
Which simplifies to
It's generally nicer to work with letters than numbers when the situation arises.
Closed by @amber tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
7 men, 6 women; 5 people are selected. At least 3 men has to be selected, how many ways can this be done?
Why is 7C3 * 10C2 a bogus solution?
My logic was: I already chose 3 men in the 7C3. So it doesn't matter how many men/women I choose next, right? Or no? So I can now choose 2 people from the rest that are not chosen
Are the men distinct
It wasn't stated in the problem
From a group of 7 men and 6 women, five persons are to be selected to form a
committee so that at least 3 men are there on the committee. In how many ways can
it be done?
If the men aint distinct then the sol is right I think
Apparently the correct solution is
(7C3 * 6C2) + (7C4 * 6C1) + (7C5)
Hmmm
you've assumed an ordering by doing 7C3 * 10C2
wdym
from this, you've labelled the 3 men chosen first as having been chosen first
oh
and hence you are overcounting
sorry, i don't understand. why is this wrong?
because the choice of 5 people is ultimately unordered
say you've got M1 to 7 and W1 to 6
you choose M1, M2, M3, then M4, W1
but this is the same as choosing M1, M2, M4, then M3, W1
OH
in doing 7C3 * 10C2, you count these as distinct
yeahhhh
that's why
thanks
but if it was stated that the men and women are distinct, my solution would be correct right?
no
oh
the men and women are already distinct
it is the set of people chosen that ultimately matters
not the order in which they are chosen
yes
Closed by @vague obsidian
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this question. I don't know how I would describe it but I tried for A, A={x in S : 1 ≤ x < 4} so I suppose this way it includes 1,2 and 3 but excludes 4
you dont need to have the condition that x<4 since no elements are greater than 4
greater than or equal to 4
@sage pawn Has your question been resolved?
What about 1≤x≤3
you dont need an upper bound
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Oh i didnt know it was some kind of homework
you generally don't send direct answers in help channels, homework or not
I mean, is 1≤x≤3 technically right? 1 is included, 2 is between 1 and 3 and 3 also included
it is technically right, but it's unnecessary
Not technically, it is right but we need with only one condition
like LocalLunatic said, you don't need the upperbound
your universal set, S, does not contain any element above 3, so adding the restriction of smaller or equal to 3 is unnecessary
Does the condition on x involve a inequality
you can call me loon
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yes, only one
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Well the elements 1,2,3 are all positive
@sage pawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i expanded the function and made it under one fraction
and got -1/16
but ion get how Moe is wrong lmao
what he said does make sense ngl
But the other expression evaluates to undef as x->4
So it's a type of undetermined limit of the form 0*inf
oh we need L, M
both need to be finite for the limit laws to work ye?
Exactly
thanks g
Np
.close
Closed by @fading sorrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wait what i hthought they had to be finite?
This can happen if f(x)+g(x) add to be finite
so infinite + infinite = finite?
thats trippy tho ngl
cuz isnt infinite + infinite determinate that its infinite?
Calculus do be like that tho
ye man should have done like bachelors of media or something 💀
Only sorta related
Imagine your job is to lay down an infinite number of crumbs for a trail
And you start and lay down 5 by the time i notice
My back is feeling big so i pick up the crumbs at the same rate as you lay them down
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so the case of infinity - infinity
which is indeed indeterminate
we dont know which is approcahing infinity faster
so are you saying that even tho we got f(x) + g(x)
we can possibly have a -(gx) or -(fx) which can result in infinity - infinity
Sorta
some sort of cancellation happening
If you think about it tho, after infinite time, i pick up infinite crumbs and you lay down infinite crumbs but they will only be 5 crumbs on the floor at any one time
This cancellation can only happen if the infinites grow at the same rate
yoooo thats a good analogy
but still incredibly trippy tho
but from what i learned, infinity - infinity like what we are doing now is indeterminate
If i picked up the crumbs faster than you lay them down, i will catch up. If you lay them down faster than I pick them up, there will be infinite crumbs on the floor
This showcases that even if some functions grow to infinity, some infinities are bigger than others
so remember how we had 0*inf earlier and we said we cant do anything with it cuz we are not sure what it is and Moe just said its 0. but what if Moe said the limit is indeterminate. would that be correct
same with that here no? we dont know what inf - inf is, it could be finite like you said but it could be infinite as well. we dont know
so in this question here, it says provide an example. im just providing an example where inf - inf is finite?
but i should be aware that if lim fx, and lim gx is non existant
lim (fx + gx) could be either existant OR non existant?
So when a limit is in indeterminant form, we have to manipulate/simplify the expression inside before we say what the value is
So for this problem, things should be simplied into one fraction before evaulating inside the limit statement
ye i did that
ye solving the limit is easy
Im just getting confused by indeterminate, determinate
cuz im finding it weird how infinite limits can combine to become finite, which im sure is infinite - infinite case
there has to be some cancelling i think
i got the example
(x^2 / x-3) - (3x/x-3)
lim to 3 doesnt exist for each of the three functions separately but exists for them combined
i think i get it now kind og
of
That works
I think so
ye thank you man
that grain analogy was goated
thanks man
Np
@fading sorrel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i think this is false
?
using limit laws
we would get a finite number +- infinite
which is infinte, hence limit doesnt exist
are the [] brackets just brackests or do they have a special meaning?
combine fx + gx
THEN take the limit
normal brackets unless stated
wait whats the go with brackets? is there something important im missing
?
its just parentheses aint it?

rip