#help-27

1 messages · Page 287 of 1

devout trench
#

correct me if i'm wrong

solar goblet
#

yes that is correct

#

can you do this now?

devout trench
#

ohh

#

okay wait

#

i substitute the value of b in this?

#

or should i do a different one

#

like uh

#

oh nvm still the same

#

which is?

solar goblet
#

i want you to calculate it yourself

#

and tell me the answer

devout trench
#

i substituted the value of b^2 into the equation

#

idk if it's right

#

(a+c)^2 + c^2 = 2a^2?

devout snowBOT
#

@devout trench Has your question been resolved?

devout trench
#

yo @solar goblet am i right?

#

i've been watching spiderman

#

lmao ghosted me

#

my take is 45 degrees

#

idk if i'm wrong

glacial drift
#

hi

solar goblet
#

oops sorry i was playing pjsk

solar goblet
devout trench
#

2ac + 2c^2 = a^2

solar goblet
#

now calculate c in terms of a or b

devout trench
#

lmao i'm still watching spiderman

solar goblet
#

stop

#

this is not something to be proud of

#

do this first, THEN watch spiderman

devout trench
devout snowBOT
#

@devout trench Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

plain lance
#

Having trouble conceptually / visually understanding how moving a negative exponent to the numerator and vice versa denominator becomes positive with integer #'s

plain lance
#

Yup

willow dew
#

just think harder

hollow pulsar
#

its actually a definition

#

but some people prove it too

lost laurel
#

hint||: multiplicative inverses ||

#

So essentially if I have $a^n$ , what's its multiplicative inverse ?

woven radishBOT
#

ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know

plain lance
#

$a^-n$

woven radishBOT
lost laurel
#

$a^{-n}$

#

yup

woven radishBOT
#

ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know

lost laurel
#

Now, we define $a^{-1} = \frac{1}{a}$

#

or alternatively

#

multiply $a^n$ by $1/a^n$

woven radishBOT
#

ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know

lost laurel
#

what does that give you?

#

Isn't 1/a^n a multiplicative inverse too?

lusty sapphire
#

(you may want to talk about $a^0$ first)

woven radishBOT
lost laurel
#

Fair, but I pressume OP know that that is defined to be 1

#

Now, multiplicative inverses are unique

#

what does that tell you

plain lance
lost laurel
#

Hmm

#

if I divide a number by itself

#

what do I get

plain lance
#

1

lost laurel
#

recall $\frac{a}{b}$ means I'm dividing a by b

woven radishBOT
#

ƒ( wai ina teacup)= I don't know

tame palm
lost laurel
plain lance
#

Think i got it

#

thank you

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @plain lance

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

naive mantle
#

This is a physics problem indeed, but the work is mostly mathematical and it revolves around a few formulas from Ohm's law on a simple circuit

naive mantle
#
  1. A battery powers a resistor with an electric current of intensity I = 24A. If the resistance is increased by f_1 = 25%, the current intensity decreases by f_2 = 20%. Determine:

a. The new value of the electric current intensity in the circuit if the resistance is decreased by f_1 = 25%.

b. By what percentage does the voltage across the resistor change in the case where the resistance decreases compared to the case where it increases?

c. By what percentage does the resistance of the conductor change if the temperature varies by Δt=80°C, given that the thermal coefficient of resistivity is α=6*10^(-4)°C^(-1) and the initial resistance was at a temperature of 0°C?

merry patio
#

which question are you stuck at?

naive mantle
#

Honestly, a

merry patio
#

well you know that the battery is always the same so V is constant

naive mantle
#

Yup

merry patio
#

therefore IR must be equal to IR after reduced

naive mantle
#

So I1R1 = I2R2 and we just adapt to f_1?

merry patio
#

well im not good at this so ill let someone else help

merry patio
naive mantle
#

Sure, thanks for the efforts

#

For reference:

V = IR
I = E / (R + r)

devout snowBOT
#

@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?

naive mantle
#

<@&286206848099549185>

devout snowBOT
#

@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?

solid osprey
#

V=IR
V_1=24R_1
V_2=24R_2
(V_2-V_1)/V_1=25/100
(R_2-R_1)/R_1=20/100
find R_1 interms of R_2 and V_1 interms of V_2 no?

twilit goblet
#

i think the have explained enough

devout snowBOT
#

@naive mantle Has your question been resolved?

naive mantle
#

Yea! I think I got it. Thanks!

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @naive mantle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

karmic hill
#

what kind of curve can i use to fit into this distribution?
i tried gamma and it didnt converge
gaussian area, gaussian amp, bigaussian, lorantz all look weird

valid silo
#

can you tell how you generated it?

karmic hill
#

this is from an afm image

#

welp id say its simular to a lorantz distribution

devout snowBOT
#

@karmic hill Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@karmic hill Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

restive river
devout snowBOT
restive river
#

I asked chatgpt how to find the inverse of a 3x3 but it's giving me a long method, but this question is only worth 3 marks

#

Is there a quicker way?

tall stirrup
#

Don't ask ChatGPT for answers, currently AI is not that advanced and can give wrong answers confidently

karmic hill
#

fastest way is just LM=1

#

cause you know M=L^(-1)
ML=L^(-1)L=1

polar chasm
#

I'd just use gaussian elimination

#

its lower triangular, so it should be quite easy

restive river
#

I remember this

#

Thank you all for your inputs

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @austere yarrow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

small urchin
#

$\mathbf{t}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/2 \ 1 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}, \quad
\mathbf{t}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 2 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}, \quad
\mathbf{t}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}$

woven radishBOT
#

Task Bot

small urchin
#

They're not linearly independent, right?

#

$t_1=-2t_3 , t_2=t_3, 0=0$

woven radishBOT
#

Task Bot

zenith jacinth
#

t_1 isn't equal to -2 t_3

#

and t_2 and t_3 aren't equal too

wheat cave
#

btw there is an obvious linear combination between them

zenith jacinth
#

t_1 = 1/2 t_2 + 1/2 t_3

vivid estuary
small urchin
#

T1/2+t3=0 -> T1=-2t3

zenith jacinth
#

-2 t_3 doesnt give t_1

#

you can calculate and see for urself

zenith jacinth
small urchin
#

I don't understand where I went wrong

zenith jacinth
#

where does this come from tho

small urchin
zenith jacinth
#

t_1 definitely isn't equal to -2 t_3

#

its obvious

small urchin
#

????

#

$\frac{t_1}{2}+t_3=0$

woven radishBOT
#

Task Bot

dawn lintel
#

Why do you say $t_1=-2t_3$

woven radishBOT
#

Eternal Night

zenith jacinth
dawn lintel
small urchin
zenith jacinth
dawn lintel
#

Bruh

zenith jacinth
#

you can verify

small urchin
#

I think I didn't make any mistakes

zenith jacinth
#

$-2 \begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 1 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} -2 \times 1 \ -2 \times 0 \ -2 \times 1 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} -2 \ 0 \ -2 \end{pmatrix}$

woven radishBOT
#

Herels

zenith jacinth
#

that thing is not t_1

small urchin
#

Ops

#

I think I asked the question wrong

#

Sorry

#

$\mathbf{t}_1 \begin{pmatrix} 1/2 \ 1 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}+ \quad
\mathbf{t}_2 \begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 2 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}+ \quad
\mathbf{t}_3 \begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 0 \end{pmatrix}$

woven radishBOT
#

Task Bot

small urchin
#

@zenith jacinth

zenith jacinth
small urchin
#

So are they linearly dependent?

#

Because

#

$t_1=-2t_3 , t_2=t_3, 0=0$

woven radishBOT
#

Task Bot

zenith jacinth
#

t_1 = -2 t_3
t-1 = - 2 t_2
t_1 + t_2 + t_3 = 0

thats what im getting

small urchin
#

Yes

zenith jacinth
#

t_1 t_2 and t_3 aren't equal to 0, so the vectors aren't linearly independant

small urchin
#

So there is no basis for the image of f?

zenith jacinth
#

it doesnt mean that

#

you only took 3 vectors

small urchin
#

I'm following this

#

For vectors to be a basis they need to be:

linear independent
span the subspace

#

And the first point comes off as false to me

zenith jacinth
woven radishBOT
#

Herels

zenith jacinth
#

the first vector can be write as a linear combination of the two others

#

would make sense that the other two vectors themselves formed a basis

#

since they are linearly independent

devout snowBOT
#

@small urchin Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@small urchin Has your question been resolved?

somber heron
#

2t_1 -t_2=t_3

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

patent geyser
#

What do y’all get

devout snowBOT
patent geyser
#

I got 68 but I feel like that’s wrong

devout snowBOT
#

@patent geyser Has your question been resolved?

last burrow
#

You're right that you're wrong.

#

I got 32.

patent geyser
#

How

valid silo
#

i also got 68

#

you are right

#

i did

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

valid silo
#

.reopen

#

@patent geyser

patent geyser
patent geyser
#

Maybe there’s two solutions

#

Maybe it’s 68 or 32

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

last burrow
#

oh

valid silo
#

68 for certain

#

reopen it quickly

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

old jungle
devout snowBOT
old jungle
#

how do we know its a rotation of 120

devout snowBOT
#

@old jungle Has your question been resolved?

restive river
#

just compute

#

#

A ³

#

A ⁴

#

and see the difference

#

and how it rotates

old jungle
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @old jungle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ocean gale
#

Annie and Xenas each arrive at a party at a random time between $2:00$ and $4:00$. Each stays for $45$ minutes and then leaves. What is the probability that Annie and Xenas see each other at the party?

woven radishBOT
ocean gale
#

I’m supposed to use geometric probability somehow but idk how

devout snowBOT
#

@ocean gale Has your question been resolved?

ocean gale
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

Nvm I got it

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ocean gale

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

restive river
#

can anyone say me the answer for this question?

restive river
#

so according to me the answer should be (d) 0

#

because

#

my teacher said that we will not consider the edges with directions while calculating the degree

#

so can someone please say the correct thing?

#

please tag me if anyone answers

restive river
#

if it was indegree then the answer was supposed to be 1 and similarly for the case of outdegree

#

but how do we calculate the degree?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

safe jasper
#

afaik if they specified indegree or outdegree then you'd consider the directionality, but if they just say degree then you'd treat it like any other graph

#

as in just the number of adjacent edges

#

regardless of directionality

restive river
#

so what should the answer be in this case? 2?

safe jasper
#

that's what i would think

restive river
#

okay thank youu 💛

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tender seal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ripe plank
#
  • The expression: “ a | b^b | (-c) => a|c “ is true, sometimes true, false
alpine python
#

seems true,
you don't even need to use b to show it's true

ripe plank
#

yea i also cant find an example where its wrong

alpine python
#

a | -c means there's some k with ak = -c
so a(-k) = c
so a divides c

ripe plank
#

yea tgx

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ripe plank

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

restive river
devout snowBOT
restive river
#

Integration by parts, correct?

#

We would have to take 1/(cos x)^2 as the part to take the antiderivative of

#

bruh

#

as im explaining it to myself im understanding it

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @void oar

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hollow pulsar
#

two last questions

olive snow
#

Ça veut dire quoi les flèches

#

Implique ?

hollow pulsar
#

nn nn

#

les limites sont égales

#

en +inf

#

car ce sont des suites

olive snow
#

Ok

#

Bon déjà Un est constante

hollow pulsar
#

ouf, mais non, j'ai écris les suites en faux

olive snow
#

Pour la deux

hollow pulsar
hollow pulsar
devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

hollow pulsar
#

oh wait no

#

ill get another channel

olive snow
#

Refais en un

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

blazing crest
#

i dont know what to do

devout snowBOT
supple knot
#

,w .diff rules

blazing crest
#

i feel like they just asked me the same question thrice

supple knot
#

,tex .diff rules

blazing crest
#

but just worded differently

woven radishBOT
#

riemann

blazing crest
#

idk Leibniz but the rest im familiar with

supple knot
#

Just use power rule then

blazing crest
#

do i have to say for x smaller than 1 the derivative is 2x

#

and for bigger than 1 the derivative is also 2x

supple knot
#

Yes

blazing crest
#

damn

#

and for b do i use the definition of derivative

#

f(x) - f(c) / x-c and x approaches c

#

for both cases, 2x when x approaches 1 is 2

#

is that it?

supple knot
#

Missing parentheses but sure that works

blazing crest
#

what are those

supple knot
#

(a-b)/(c-d)

#

() are parentheses

blazing crest
#

Oh ye mb

#

And how does c work?

supple knot
#

c should be inferred by matching the definition

blazing crest
#

i get the definition but how does this correlate with c

supple knot
#

Oh you don't need the definition of derivative for b)

#

just plug in 2x for f'(x) into the limit

blazing crest
#

f(1) = 1

#

and lim x goes to 1 of x^2 + 1 = 2

#

so there is a jump

#

and not continuos

#

not continuos on 1=> not differentiable on 1

supple knot
#

That works yea

devout snowBOT
#

@blazing crest Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @blazing crest

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

thick schooner
devout snowBOT
thick schooner
#

is the wording on this ambiguous?

#

aren't they asking for maximum spanning (length) interval

#

i actually don't know how to phrase it

feral agate
#

they are

thick schooner
#

but would you say this question is posed well?

#

i'm guessing they want 1 < x < 7 but okay i'm more concerned about how they phrased the question

feral agate
#

it would be better if they said
If the possible values of x lie in (a, b) then find b-a

thick schooner
#

yeah okay smth like that

#

maybe all possible values instead?

thick schooner
#

ngl makes no sense to me

feral agate
#

it does

thick schooner
#

if someone didn't know triangle inequality

#

they'd understand it?

#

i guess maybe yeah

alpine python
#

i feel like they should just ask for the maximum and minimum possible values of x

devout snowBOT
#

@thick schooner Has your question been resolved?

topaz axle
#

it doesn't make sense

#

failure of communication

thick schooner
thick schooner
#

there’s also the bias that i kinda know what they’re testing

#

i wanted to clarify whether the way they’ve asked the question could be handled by someone unfamiliar with this topic

topaz axle
#

it's absurd

arctic field
#

it sure is poorly phrased

devout snowBOT
#

@thick schooner Has your question been resolved?

thick schooner
#

alright thanks guys

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @thick schooner

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

restive river
devout snowBOT
restive river
devout snowBOT
#

@restive river Has your question been resolved?

orchid axle
#

i’ll take a look

tall stirrup
#

I think I know the answer but not sure how to articulate this

orchid axle
#

problem is wrong

restive river
#

Nope

orchid axle
#

impossible

restive river
#

Why?

tall stirrup
#

This is possible the answer i got is 30

restive river
#

Yup, that's the answer

orchid axle
#

wait or not

#

i missed something

tall stirrup
#

I had solved a similar problem while ago

#

Can you draw a diagram

orchid axle
#

answer is 30???

tall stirrup
#

Yeah

#

I got the problem I solved its from Indian National Mathematics Olympiad 2016

restive river
tall stirrup
orchid axle
#

i was messing around in geogebra

#

and constructed this

#

A is (0, 160)

#

decimals might be off but there is a triangle that satisfies the problem around here

tall stirrup
#

You can refer to any solution to Q.5

restive river
#

thank you so much

#

🙂

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @waxen crag

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

orchid axle
#

can you construct the triangle and send it

#

please

#

turns out it actually looks like that

#

A and C do not lay on rational coordinates

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sand haven
#

How’d you do this?

devout snowBOT
sand haven
#

^3sqrt(64) is 4

#

Sqrt(625) is 25

orchid axle
#

so its sqrt(4/25)

#

which is sqrt(4)/(sqrt(25)

#

which is 2/5

sand haven
#

Omg!!!

#

Thank you

#

This is sooo easy

devout snowBOT
#

@sand haven Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@sand haven Has your question been resolved?

sage burrow
devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

harsh drum
#

Where does the 2root2 over 3 come from?

devout snowBOT
tall stirrup
#

sin x =1/3

woven radishBOT
#

Pro_Hecker

devout snowBOT
#

@harsh drum Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @harsh drum

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

faint gorge
#

Let $G$ be an abelian (commutative)$^{}$ group and $n \in \mathbb{N}.\$
Show that the map [ \Phi_n : G \to G, \quad \Phi_n(u) := u^n ] is a group-homomorphism.
$\ \ \textbf{Proof.}\$
Let $a,b \in G.\$
Then [ \Phi_n(ab) = (ab)^n \overset{
}{=} a^nb^n = \Phi_n(a)\Phi_n(b) \quad \text{for all } a,b \in G. ]
Hence $\Phi_n$ is a group - homomorphism.$\ \$
Which elements of $G$ form the kernel of the map $\Phi_n? \$
Proceed to give a non-trivial group $G$ and natural numbers $n_1, n_2 > 1 \$ such that $\Phi_{n_1}$ is $\textbf{ an isomorphism }$ and $\Phi_{n_2}$ is $\textbf{not an isomorphism.} \$

woven radishBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

faint gorge
#

I need help on how to tackle the next part with the kernel and isomorphism stuff

#

My problem is I don't know whether G is finite or not too

#

And I am afraid I would need to do cases

#

The kernel is [ \ker(\Phi_n) := {u \in G \mid u^n = e, : n \in \mathbb{N} } ] where $e$ denotes the neutral element of $G.$

woven radishBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

stone stump
#

you are allowed to choose the group G for your examples

hot steeple
#

Without any more info about G it is fine to keep the kernel non specific

faint gorge
#

So before I start, I choose an abelian group and then proceed my work from there?

hot steeple
#

For this you can just choose a G

#

For this you gave the answer as specific as is possible without more information about G

faint gorge
#

So I literally just write down the definition of the kernel

hot steeple
#

well no

#

You specified that the elements have to be to the power of n and be equal to the identity

#

instead of saying

#

the kernel of f is all u for which f(u) = e

#

you say

faint gorge
#

ok i get it

hot steeple
#

the kernel of f is all u for which u^n = e

faint gorge
#

ok

#

good

#

you know you remember yesterday

#

where we specified n

#

like n = ord(a)k, k in N or something like that

hot steeple
#

That works if the order of a is finite

devout snowBOT
#

@faint gorge Has your question been resolved?

woven radishBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

faint gorge
#

I hope this is fine

hot steeple
#

ye

#

That's fine

#

Also a not obvious choice i like it

faint gorge
#

thank

#

.solved

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @faint gorge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

faint gorge
#

,, 19^{290} \overset{37}{\equiv} : ?

devout snowBOT
woven radishBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

faint gorge
#

I am kind of clueless how to approach this

frozen aurora
#

37 is prime

frozen aurora
faint gorge
#

ok will

devout snowBOT
#

@faint gorge Has your question been resolved?

faint gorge
#

28

#

I spent so much time cant believe it I hate numbers

#

It's not even about being genius

#

[ 19^{290} = 19^{36 \cdot 8} \cdot 19^2 = \underbrace{(19^{37-1})^8}_{\overset{37}{\equiv} 1} \cdot 19^2 = 361 = 37 \cdot 9 + 28 \overset{37}{\equiv} 28 ]

woven radishBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

faint gorge
#

VegetaSob rip

#

,w 19^(290) mod 37

faint gorge
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @faint gorge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

restive river
#

anyone?

devout snowBOT
restive river
restive river
#

but that doesnt make sense to me considering it grouped the ABC term twice

devout snowBOT
#

@restive river Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

undone sequoia
#

Just curious on what the optimal approach for questions regarding permutations and combinations is.
Also I'd like to understand multinomial expansions and how to solve questions such as:-

the remainder of (7^2022 + 3^2022)÷5

Last digit of 3^104

undone sequoia
#

Last two digits

#

My teachers done something like (10-1)^52

#

Binomial expanded and I don't know what after. No idea why though

alpine python
#

i would try something like

crisp tapir
#

so essentially only the last digit matters

undone sequoia
#

I could also use some kind of pattern could I not?

#

this method is quite interesting though

crisp tapir
#

wdym

#

oh right for 3 you can i get you 3 9 7 1 right?

undone sequoia
#

3^2 has last digit as 9, 3^3 has 7, 3^4 has 1, 3^5 has 3 again

undone sequoia
crisp tapir
#

and 104 is 4k type so it will be 1

alpine python
undone sequoia
#

can I use that for last two digits?

#

Also does the method we're talking about work for say 10-2 or 9-3? Or is it valid only for this situation?

woven radishBOT
undone sequoia
alpine python
#

look at the powers of 7 mod 5:
7 is 2

#

multiply 2 by 7 to get 14 which is 4

#

multiply 4 by 7 to get 28 which is 3

#

multiply 3 by 7 to get 21 which is 1

#

so powers of 7 go in a cycle: {2, 4, 3, 1}

#

and 7^4 is 1

#

so u just replace 7^4 with 1 in the equation

crisp tapir
undone sequoia
#

Oh alright. give me a second I'll write it down

#

Got it

undone sequoia
#

Thank you so much both of you

devout snowBOT
#

@undone sequoia Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

upbeat stone
#

Aaa

devout snowBOT
upbeat stone
#

I was trying to find derivative df/dx of f(x) = sqrt (x) by using geometry

#

So if u make a square with sides sqrt (x), the area of the square is x

#

So if u increase the sides by a little amount (df), we wanna know how much we increase the area (dx)

#

So we added df.(sqrt(x)) + df.(sqrt(x)) + df^2 which is equal to dx

#

But df is approaching 0, not dx, and idk what to do

#

May anyone help please?

olive snow
#

uhm

woven radishBOT
sage burrow
upbeat stone
#

Aaa

#

My Wi-Fi is not working

upbeat stone
#

Idk how i can explain in a different way

upbeat stone
wicked turtle
woven radishBOT
wicked turtle
#

with the usual observation that (d something)^2 is very small and can be neglected haha

upbeat stone
#

Ye if i do this it works

#

But idk why

olive snow
#

indeed

upbeat stone
#

I dont think it could be ignored but idk

wicked turtle
olive snow
#

it can

#

:)

wicked turtle
#

to understand why you need to formulate it properly in terms of limits

upbeat stone
#

Then df approaches 0 and u can eliminate everything that has df

wicked turtle
#

you want me to write down the limit you need to evaluate?

upbeat stone
#

I did not learn limit so idk

olive snow
#

d.sqrt(x) -> 0 and (d.sqrt(x))² goes faster to zero

wicked turtle
upbeat stone
olive snow
#

without limit its the idea to have in mind

upbeat stone
#

Thats not so rigorous

wicked turtle
olive snow
#

otherwise i don't know any sol without this

wicked turtle
#

it is, if you're finding df/dx

upbeat stone
#

Yeah

wicked turtle
#

which is your goal

upbeat stone
#

But df is the small thing

wicked turtle
#

they're both small

#

rearrange your equation to get it in the form df/dx instead of dx/df

upbeat stone
#

Df is the one approaching 0

wicked turtle
#

they're both approaching 0

#

that's how derivatives work

#

you want to find out what limit their ratio approaches

upbeat stone
#

Thats true since dx has df multiplying it

#

So it also approaches 0

#

So can i find dx / df and then do 1 / it?

wicked turtle
#

yep

#

that's valid in general as long as the derivative is not zero

upbeat stone
#

Yeah yeah that makes sense

#

So i think it makes sense like this

#

Thx

wicked turtle
#

yw

upbeat stone
#

I still wont close cuz i might need help still lol

wicked turtle
#

sure

upbeat stone
#

So dx = 2.sqrt(x).df + df^2, but saying that df^2 is perfectly equal to 0 because df approaches 0 does not seem rigorous

#

So we find dx/df = 2sqrt(x) + df. Since df approaches 0, 2sqrt(x) + df approaches 2sqrt(x). So df/dx will approach 1/(2sqrt(x))

devout snowBOT
#

@upbeat stone Has your question been resolved?

upbeat stone
devout snowBOT
#

@upbeat stone Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

solid osprey
devout snowBOT
solid osprey
lusty wing
#

Ok

solid osprey
#

well for a cant you take x=2^2013 -1

lusty wing
#

Lmao this was my primary school task…gosh I miss so much that book.

solid osprey
#

if you take the mod that gives -1^(some massive odd number+1 mod 2^2013
-1+1=0 mod 2^2013 so its divisible

cyan surge
#

Can't we use mathematical induction?

solid osprey
#

please enlighten me

#

heres for the first few terms:
the smallest x for any n i will express in (n,x)
(1,1)
(2,9)
(3,7)
(4,6)
(5,5)
(6,5)
(7,4)
(8,4)
(9,4)
(10,4)
(11,4)
(12,4)
(13,4)
(14,3)
(15,3)
(16,3)

#

assuming desmos isnt bugging cause the numbers are massivr

stone stump
#

time to learn better tools

solid osprey
#

dpes modulsr aritmethic break at e31

stone stump
#

x can definitely not be 4

#

4^(...)+1 is certainly not divisible by 2^n

solid osprey
#

ok fair

stone stump
#

just use for example python

#

easy to use and can handle large ints without problems

solid osprey
#

like i can code 🙏

stone stump
#

learn it

solid osprey
#

a

#

ok yeah doesent work

#

how big of numbers can python handle

cyan surge
#

let me try by proving specifically for 2013

devout snowBOT
#

@solid osprey Has your question been resolved?

solid osprey
cyan surge
#

I've done my calculations. But I have to get ready for work.
So I'll be able to explain in the afternoon or evening.
I can send you my rough work though

solid osprey
#

alright

cyan surge
solid osprey
#

sorry man i have no idea what im looking at

devout snowBOT
#

@solid osprey Has your question been resolved?

torn bane
# solid osprey

you want to find y so that 2^n|(y^ny + 1), hence we must also have 2^n|(y^{2ny} - 1)

#

now you can apply euler's theorem mod 2^n

#

not sure if this is enough, but it's where i would start

solid osprey
#

???

solid osprey
torn bane
#

yeah

solid osprey
#

uhh

#

pandahmm my brain is not braining rn

#

totient of 2^y is 2^(y-1)

torn bane
#

sorry, should be 2^n, not 2^y

solid osprey
#

2^n and 2ny isnt coprime tho

torn bane
#

what does euler's theorem say

solid osprey
#

if a and n are coprime then a^totient(n)=1 mod n

torn bane
#

yeah, so why is it relevant if 2^n and 2ny aren't coprime

solid osprey
#

if they are coprime then a^2ny=1 mod 2^n no?

#

wait so is ny=2^(n-1)

torn bane
#

??

torn bane
solid osprey
#

uhh

#

is that not a property

torn bane
#

are you trying to cite euler's theorem?

#

you need y and 2^n to be coprime for euler's theorem, not 2^n and 2ny

#

you always have y coprime to 2^n since otherwise we definitely have that 2^n does not divide y^{ny} + 1

solid osprey
#

oh ok

#

im o sure y^{2ny}=1 mod 2^y, by eulers 2ny is a multiple of 2^(y-1), ny=2^(y-2), since y is coprime to n then n=k*2^(y-2)

#

or am i stupid

torn bane
#

wait

#

why are you claiming that 2ny is a multiple of 2^y-1

#

2^y-1 isn't necessarily the order of y mod 2^y

solid osprey
#

cause 2^(y-1) is the totient(2^y) no?

#

wait

torn bane
#

yeah, but that doesn't make it the order (least number k so that y^k = 1 mod 2^y)

solid osprey
#

or is it the opposite

torn bane
#

if the order was that, then yeah i would agree

#

we don't know either way

#

all we can say is that both 2^n | y^{2^(n-1)} -1, and that 2^n | y^{2ny}-1

solid osprey
#

i saw somewhere the order divides the totient

#

so the order<=totient?

torn bane
#

yeah, but we don't know what the order is

solid osprey
#

hm

torn bane
#

the way to proceed is that this tells us that $2^n | y^{gcd(2ny, 2^{n-1})} -1$

woven radishBOT
torn bane
#

since $o_{2^n}(y) | gcd(2ny, 2^{n-1})$

woven radishBOT
solid osprey
#

pandahmm how can you say y^gcd(2ny,2^(n-1))-1 is divisible by 2^n

torn bane
#

if $m|a^k-1$, then $o_m(a) | k$

woven radishBOT
torn bane
#

so if $m|a^{\alpha} - 1$, and $m|a^{\beta} - 1$, then $o_{m}(a)|\alpha$ and $o_{m}(a)|\beta$, hence $o_m(a)|\gcd(\alpha, \beta)$

woven radishBOT
solid osprey
#

o

#

alr so gcd(2ny,2^(n-1))=2*gcd(n,2^(n-2)) as y is coprime to 2^n

#

$o_{2^n}(y)\mid 2\gcd(n,2^{n-2})$

woven radishBOT
#

skissue.in.a.teacup

devout snowBOT
#

@solid osprey Has your question been resolved?

torn bane
woven radishBOT
torn bane
#

so o(y) = 2^k for some k <= p+1

#

actually it seems like we need something more here :(

#

the other idea was to do some sort of expansion with the binomial theorem

#

so could try that

solid osprey
#

hmm

#

how can we apply binomial theorem here?

devout snowBOT
#

@solid osprey Has your question been resolved?

crude wasp
#

hint: ||mod 4||

solid osprey
#

idts

crude wasp
#

so we only need to deal with the m = odd case for part b

solid osprey
crude wasp
#

the easiest way i can think of to do part b is lifting the exponent lol

#

but i think basically the idea of the solution is to "prove" lifting the exponent without directly quoting it

#

(so factorise it)

solid osprey
#

errrrrr so like
y^ym+1^ym=(y+1)(y^(ym-1)-y^(ym-2)+y^(ym-3)-.....+1)?

#

wait wrong var

#

do you want to do like v_2(something)>=m or smth?

#

thats the only lte usage that makes sense to me

crude wasp
#

what can you say about your other bracket?

solid osprey
#

so 2|y+1=>y=1 mod 2 (duh)
y^(ym-1)-y^(ym-2)+y^(ym-3)-...+1=y^2m=m=1 mod 2

#

so y^ym+1^ym=y+1 mod 2

crude wasp
#

well all the prime factors of 2s are contained in y+1

#

so in order to have 2^m divide y^(ym) + 1, 2^m divides y+1

#

so you can finish

#

(this is basically you prove LTE btw)

solid osprey
#

whar (note i have no idea how wiki makes the jump from the factor to proving v_p(x^n+y^n)=v_p(x+y))

#

v_2(y^ym+1^ym)=v_2(y+1)>=m

crude wasp
#

y^3 + 1 = (y+1)(y^2 - y + 1)

#

y^2 - y + 1 is odd

#

so if 2^n divides y^3 + 1, 2^n divides y+1

solid osprey
#

oh

#

so id the smallest y just 2^m -1?

#

i seeeee

#

.close tyy!

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @solid osprey

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

crude wasp
#

nw!

solid osprey
#

mr/ms/smthelse ly

crude wasp
solid osprey
#

national contest?

crude wasp
#

for any contest, as long as u say LTE or lifting the exponent, it'll be fine

solid osprey
#

pandahugg hype, so hype

#

are there any well known ""lemma""'s that i can use without proving it

crude wasp
#

(so i'd try to avoid stuff like Mihalescu's theorem/Catalan conjecture)

#

(i think that's the only one lol)

solid osprey
#

cataland opening?

crude wasp
#

no it's the x^y - a^b = 1

solid osprey
#

:p wb the zsigmondy

crude wasp
#

zsigmondy is fine

#

for bigger theorems, if you use them i'd try to make sure you quote them properly (just so whoever marks your work knows u aren't bluffing)

#

you may want to avoid using big theorems like these when u do practice problems but that's up to you

solid osprey
#

agh i wanted to ask something but i forgor

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

flint obsidian
#

I need help with this which approach should I use

devout snowBOT
#

@flint obsidian Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@flint obsidian Has your question been resolved?

narrow spindle
#

can this be done using an example?

devout snowBOT
#

@flint obsidian Has your question been resolved?

flint obsidian
wheat pawn
#

if you dont wanna die computing it tho, you would replace one of the lines or columns by the sum of all 4 lines or columns as first step, then dividing the determinant in two using their properties

flint obsidian
wheat pawn
#

what, to brute force it? or with properties?

#

i'm gonna call a1, a2, a3 and a4, a b c d for simplicity (loading mspaint:)

#

i'd start like that

#

then on both, i'd substract the first row from the other 3

#

that should simplify the determinant quite a lot

flint obsidian
# wheat pawn

okay so you firstly added 4 to the first column right? and then using properties you separated the first column into two

#

right?

wheat pawn
#

no

flint obsidian
#

so how you getting 4 + a?

#

I mean by which operation

wheat pawn
#

if you add a linear combination of the other columns to a column, the determinant is not modified

#

on this case, to column 1, i added column 2, column 3 and column 4

flint obsidian
#

oh yeah

#

I got it now

flint obsidian
wheat pawn
#

C1'=C1+C2+C3+C4

#

then, on both:
Rn'=Rn-R1

flint obsidian
#

what does ' this refers though?

wheat pawn
#

the new line

#

to distinguish it from the ones you originally had

flint obsidian
#

Oh got it

#

damn thanks man it really helped me it got a lot simpler

wheat pawn
#

honestly it's probably not the approach *i* would use on a test, but it's one of the recommended ones.
I would most likely only go, from the original, Rn'=Rn-R1 and then bruteforce it

flint obsidian
#

I see I also thought of doing substracting R1 from R2,R3,R4 and then taking a1 common from column 1 but That approach did not work

#

or maybe I did mistake somewhere calculating it

wheat pawn
#

you dont have a1 as common factor on column 1, if you do that

#

because the first element is (1+a1), while the others are (-a1)

flint obsidian
#

yeah that's where I messed up lol

#

I am learning maths again after 3-4 years, now even I forgot the basics of it

#

I took a1 common from 1+a1 too

narrow spindle
#

wait which grade math is this

wheat pawn
#

where i live this is taught on the last year before uni

flint obsidian
#

but its actual 12th grade maths

#

I was a commerce main thats why after 10th never touched maths

devout snowBOT
#

@flint obsidian Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

forest palm
#

beggining of last line why do we have a seperate integral for just e^u?

supple knot
#

Because the integrated integral treats other variables as constants

#

int int f(u) g(v) dudv = int f(u) du * int g(v) dv

forest palm
#

oh so its just partial integration?

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @forest palm

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

amber tapir
#

i am pretty sure about this being 4, but why?:

a = 2²⁰¹¹ + 2⁻²⁰¹¹
b = 2²⁰¹¹ - 2⁻²⁰¹¹

what is a² - b²

frozen stump
#

can you write out the expansion for a^2

#

just in indice form

amber tapir
#

what do you mean by indice form

frozen stump
#

just

#

like to the power ofs

#

eg 2^(2*2011)

amber tapir
#

a=2^(2011)-2^(-2011)

#

like that?

frozen stump
#

ye but for a^2 pls

frozen stump
amber tapir
#

(2^(2011)+2^(-2011))^2

amber tapir
solid osprey
#

use the diffrence of squares no?

frozen stump
#

OH YEA

#

i was just gonna get them to expand and cancel out like terms

#

but thats probs better lol

amber tapir
#

and that goes like...

solid osprey
#

both works

restive river
frozen stump
#

not +

faint zinc
#

a^2 + b^2 = a^2 - (ib)^2 = (a + ib)(a - ib)

#

Oh lol yeah there you go

frozen stump
#

lmao

frozen stump
amber tapir
#

and how do I start solving a (or b)

frozen stump
#

nah, just sub your values of a and b in

faint zinc
#

a and b are given

#

This form just happens to be much easier to compute

#

(due to a lot of things canceling)

amber tapir
#

so its like (2^(2011)+2^(-2011) + 2^(2011)-2^(-2011)) * (2^(2011)+2^(-2011) - 2^(2011)-2^(-2011))

frozen stump
#

thats a pain to look at but yep

#

you forgot the last closing bracket tho lol

frozen stump
#

this is wrong

#

a bit

#

the last term souldnt be -2^(-2011), it should be +2^(-2011)

faint zinc
#

Instead of writing out 2^2011 and 2^(-2011) let's write c and d

#

So we have a = c + d, b = c - d

amber tapir
#

yes

faint zinc
#

So a + b = 2c and a - b = 2d, yes?

amber tapir
#

yea

faint zinc
#

Additionally, we have d = 1/c

#

So a^2 - b^2 = (a+b)(a-b)

#

Then what?

#

In terms of just c and d

amber tapir
#

2c*2d

faint zinc
#

Which simplifies to

amber tapir
#

oh yea

#

i get ir

#

22^(2011) * 22^(-2011)

faint zinc
#

It's generally nicer to work with letters than numbers when the situation arises.

amber tapir
#

huge thank you

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @amber tapir

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vague obsidian
#

7 men, 6 women; 5 people are selected. At least 3 men has to be selected, how many ways can this be done?

vague obsidian
#

Why is 7C3 * 10C2 a bogus solution?

#

My logic was: I already chose 3 men in the 7C3. So it doesn't matter how many men/women I choose next, right? Or no? So I can now choose 2 people from the rest that are not chosen

vague obsidian
#

It wasn't stated in the problem

#

From a group of 7 men and 6 women, five persons are to be selected to form a
committee so that at least 3 men are there on the committee. In how many ways can
it be done?

lament kraken
#

If the men aint distinct then the sol is right I think

vague obsidian
#

Apparently the correct solution is

(7C3 * 6C2) + (7C4 * 6C1) + (7C5)

lament kraken
#

Hmmm

arctic field
#

you've assumed an ordering by doing 7C3 * 10C2

vague obsidian
#

wdym

arctic field
#

from this, you've labelled the 3 men chosen first as having been chosen first

vague obsidian
#

oh

arctic field
#

and hence you are overcounting

vague obsidian
arctic field
#

because the choice of 5 people is ultimately unordered

#

say you've got M1 to 7 and W1 to 6

#

you choose M1, M2, M3, then M4, W1

#

but this is the same as choosing M1, M2, M4, then M3, W1

vague obsidian
#

OH

arctic field
#

in doing 7C3 * 10C2, you count these as distinct

vague obsidian
#

yeahhhh

#

that's why

#

thanks

#

but if it was stated that the men and women are distinct, my solution would be correct right?

arctic field
#

no

vague obsidian
#

oh

arctic field
#

the men and women are already distinct

#

it is the set of people chosen that ultimately matters

#

not the order in which they are chosen

vague obsidian
#

OH GOT IT

#

there's no "first choice" and "second choice"

arctic field
#

yes

vague obsidian
#

gotcha

#

thanks a lot

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vague obsidian

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sage pawn
#

I need help with this question. I don't know how I would describe it but I tried for A, A={x in S : 1 ≤ x < 4} so I suppose this way it includes 1,2 and 3 but excludes 4

fair juniper
#

you dont need to have the condition that x<4 since no elements are greater than 4

#

greater than or equal to 4

devout snowBOT
#

@sage pawn Has your question been resolved?

fair juniper
#

you dont need an upper bound

solar goblet
#

!nosols

devout snowBOT
#

As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.

low oriole
#

Oh i didnt know it was some kind of homework

solar goblet
#

you generally don't send direct answers in help channels, homework or not

sage pawn
#

I mean, is 1≤x≤3 technically right? 1 is included, 2 is between 1 and 3 and 3 also included

solar goblet
low oriole
#

Not technically, it is right but we need with only one condition

solar goblet
#

like LocalLunatic said, you don't need the upperbound

#

your universal set, S, does not contain any element above 3, so adding the restriction of smaller or equal to 3 is unnecessary

sage pawn
#

Does the condition on x involve a inequality

fair juniper
devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

fair juniper
devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sage pawn
#

Well the elements 1,2,3 are all positive

devout snowBOT
#

@sage pawn Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fading sorrel
devout snowBOT
fading sorrel
#

i expanded the function and made it under one fraction

#

and got -1/16

#

but ion get how Moe is wrong lmao

#

what he said does make sense ngl

graceful stone
#

But the other expression evaluates to undef as x->4

#

So it's a type of undetermined limit of the form 0*inf

fading sorrel
graceful stone
#

Exactly

fading sorrel
graceful stone
#

Np

fading sorrel
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fading sorrel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

fading sorrel
#

wait what i hthought they had to be finite?

graceful stone
#

This can happen if f(x)+g(x) add to be finite

fading sorrel
#

thats trippy tho ngl

#

cuz isnt infinite + infinite determinate that its infinite?

graceful stone
#

Calculus do be like that tho

fading sorrel
graceful stone
#

Only sorta related

#

Imagine your job is to lay down an infinite number of crumbs for a trail

#

And you start and lay down 5 by the time i notice

#

My back is feeling big so i pick up the crumbs at the same rate as you lay them down

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fading sorrel
fading sorrel
#

so are you saying that even tho we got f(x) + g(x)
we can possibly have a -(gx) or -(fx) which can result in infinity - infinity

graceful stone
#

Sorta

fading sorrel
#

some sort of cancellation happening

graceful stone
#

This cancellation can only happen if the infinites grow at the same rate

fading sorrel
#

but from what i learned, infinity - infinity like what we are doing now is indeterminate

graceful stone
#

If i picked up the crumbs faster than you lay them down, i will catch up. If you lay them down faster than I pick them up, there will be infinite crumbs on the floor

#

This showcases that even if some functions grow to infinity, some infinities are bigger than others

fading sorrel
# graceful stone This showcases that even if some functions grow to infinity, some infinities are...

so remember how we had 0*inf earlier and we said we cant do anything with it cuz we are not sure what it is and Moe just said its 0. but what if Moe said the limit is indeterminate. would that be correct

same with that here no? we dont know what inf - inf is, it could be finite like you said but it could be infinite as well. we dont know

so in this question here, it says provide an example. im just providing an example where inf - inf is finite?

#

but i should be aware that if lim fx, and lim gx is non existant

lim (fx + gx) could be either existant OR non existant?

graceful stone
graceful stone
# fading sorrel

So for this problem, things should be simplied into one fraction before evaulating inside the limit statement

fading sorrel
#

there has to be some cancelling i think

#

i got the example

(x^2 / x-3) - (3x/x-3)

#

lim to 3 doesnt exist for each of the three functions separately but exists for them combined

#

i think i get it now kind og

#

of

graceful stone
graceful stone
fading sorrel
#

thanks man

graceful stone
#

Np

devout snowBOT
#

@fading sorrel Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fading sorrel
devout snowBOT
fading sorrel
#

i think this is false

#

?

#

using limit laws
we would get a finite number +- infinite

#

which is infinte, hence limit doesnt exist

sage burrow
#

are the [] brackets just brackests or do they have a special meaning?

fading sorrel
snow raptor
#

normal brackets unless stated

fading sorrel
#

?

#

its just parentheses aint it?