#help-27
1 messages · Page 238 of 1
Closed by @hollow walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
actually
u can just look at the squares that can fit
and take the area of each
eg a 4 by 4 square would contribute 1 to 16 squares, so it effectively contributes 16 to the total sum. @hollow walrus
.reopen
✅
so by this logic how would I use it?
count the total number of each square size
then compute their total areas
eg for 1 by 1 squares, the total area would be 100(number) * 1(area) = 100
2 by 2 squares total area would be 9 * 9(number) * 4 (area) = idk
do it for all squares
@hollow walrus Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hollow walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i solved this ques by finding range
I got the ans but everywehere they used other method by finding minima of denominator
so i am correct ?
aye bruh back off
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).

2x - x² -1 + 1 = 1 -(x-1) ²
So y = 2×2 ^ -(x-1) ²
So the graph of y will be just the graph of f(x) but having twice the slope and being shifted one place right by 1
Differentiate the function and do the second derivative test 
How does this correlate to 2^-x^2 being translated
I am no good at translations
ignore previous messages, why does the negative sign not do anything
In the function 2^-x² substitute x = x-1 you will get y/2
Huh which negative sign?
id just try all 4 options
lol
1-(x-1)²
does the -1 before the square have no effect?
@sonic arrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sonic arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys im not getting
ivt thereom
what are the choices
so what do you think
i think that it is continous
well yes it explicitly tells you that it is
i dont know if it can be applied
"the function f(x) is continuous…"
do you know what IVT is really telling you
is it if a point exists?
consider a continuous function f and the interval (a,b), let f(a)=c and f(b)=d, then by IVT the function f takes on all values within (c,d)
essentially if the function is continuous then it has to go through every value in between the two y values at the endpoints in the interval between the two endpoints
there is no other way to go from c to d
then to go through every value between c and d
no matter the path you take
i think i get it
since it’s continuous
so since it is continous it as to go trough these points right?
mhm
no matter the path you take it has to go through the value of I
in this picture above
yes
so would the ivt be applied to all continosu limits?
the function
continuous functions
but it’s more so continuous on whichever interval is in question
as in continuous on some interval
it can be continuous outside of an integral
but you can apply IVT on an interval for which the function is continuous
so how do we solve this
we already did
we verified the condition
f is continuous on [-9,9]
thus we can apply IVT on that interval
there is mroe
which you did not show
i am not watching your screen
this pops up when you say it can be applied
would it be (6,2)?
hmm i’m wondering if they want 6,2 or -3,6
because you can get both from the graph
they told you 6,2 are two points
but from that we can get -3,6
from -9,9
well i just looks at the points for (-9,9)
f(-9)=-3
f(9)=6
but they only wanted it on the interval (-5,1)
-5 1?
can you show the entire screen
mhm
not a homework but a review for a unit test
yea just not a test
no lol
just wanted to make sure
how do we find the c
where do i find the x interavak
so -5,1)?
yes
^
^
not exist
why is that
so in this scenario
relating to what i said earlier
a=-5
b=1
c=f(a)=6
d=f(b)=2
from IVT
f takes on all values between 6 and 2 in the interval (-5,1)
so what does this mean for our question
indeed
if it was 2,6 would it be the same?
i got it wrong
since it’s continuous it takes on all the values in between
it is correct
should i submit it again?
i’m flattered
the what
steps*
well
this isn’t true
you don’t "know" it’s not continuous
you just
"don’t know" IF it’s continuous
but yes since you don’t know if it’s continuous
so it would be this?
then you can’t make the assumption and apply IVT
it never said IVT can be applied
they were just asking you what can you draw from IVT
you can’t draw anything from it since you don’t know if it’s continuous
so it would be not necessarily continous?
ok this si would i put but i go ti twrong
what were the other options for there may not exist
oh wait no
you messed up the interval
(-3,0)
because it said value of c
thus value of x
which means x interval
even after my suggestion?
you messed up the interval again
remember they gave you at the end, f(c)=k
so it would be (4,-2)?
thus c is a value of x
and k is a value of y
so the interval corresponding to k should be a range
or y interval
and the opposite for c
nope
ok let me do this again
good but make sure that the k interval goes from smallest to largest because last time when we did it the other way the marked it wrong
the c interval is correct
so instead of (-2,-5)
it should be what
because -2>-5
ok
it can go like this
because all values between the two y values are still guaranteed
the left side is arrow right?
what
i just drew x-y plane with a function
the two points
are the endpoints of the interval
but notice the IVT only guarantees values between the two functions
there may still be y values above or below the y interval
if it doesn’t specify that either of the endpoints are absolute minimums or maximums
well it didn’t say f was continuous
if it doesn’t explicitly say it’s continuous
then you can’t apply IVT
ok what do you think
yes this is the answer
so i know this is continous since it is stated
what is a
no
k is some arbitrary value of y in the interval
similarly c is some arbitrary value of x
in the given interval
so this is similar to the one before
i got it wrong
is 3<2<7
you submitted it before me
^
so this is a may be not?
mhm
think of 2 as k
when they say f(c)=2
can that be k?
if we said k is between 3 and 6
right
yes
so k coudlnt be 3 or 6 right?
we stated that 3<k<6
well it could
but
they’re using open intervals
since they already told you the function takes those two values on
so to say it again would be redundant
by using an inclusive interval
"a value of cc in the interval left parenthesis, 2, comma, 7, right parenthesis(2,7) where f, of, c, equals, 2, .f(c)=2."
is 2 inside the interval
2 is not in the interval (3,6)
don’t confuse the x and y intervals
remember
c is an x value
which is the input
when you say f(c)=whatever
oh
that’s a y value
it is using these
the y value at x=c
mhm
wait so it woudlnt exist right?
not necessarily
it could exist
but isn’t guaranteed
because it could just draw a straight line between the points
and it would never go below to 2
when can it be it cannot exist?
assuming IVT can already be applied?
yes
only if they state either of the two endpoints are absolute minimums or absolute maximums on the interval and the value in question is below the min or above the max
that would not be possible
it’s contradictory
nice
you said therefore there exists
while also saying it can not be applied
if it can not be applied then you can’t assert that there exists…
so it may not exist
thank you pingu
you’re welcome
what do you think i should search for ivt
do you think chemistry tutor is good
they have practice exercises and videos
yea he’s not bad
he’s sort of like khan academy
i’ve watched him before
not as of late but
yea was good back in the day
so khan academy is the main?
some of his videos i didn’t like
yes i’d definitely recommend khan academy
what are some books?
is it good for beginnrse?
mhm
single variable calculus
when you start doing derivatives and integrals i’d recommend chris mcmullens calculus exercises
he has a workbook
is it free online?
it may be
i see
i am starting derriatives soon
so do you think it is good to start?
clean and concise explanations
it’s how i started
what are the main things for calculus i heard it is limits deravitives
and some other thighs
i had that and some book by thompson
have you haerd the book calculus made easy by thmpson?
It's a useless book 
that’s not the one i read
i first read calculus for they practical man
but i wouldn’t recommend that one
Altho it teaches u the intuitive aspect of calc it won't teach u how to use it
i see so the mcallien thing?
some of the answers to the exercises were incorrect
mcmullen is a quick workbook
i definitely recommend
i see do you know any good youtube videos for ivt right now?
you’ll want more resources as it’s not a textbook with theorems and such
i see
i’m sure if you searched IVT on youtube you’d find some
khan academy has on
they post on youtube as well
i’m sure professor leonard has one
mit ocw is great
Il suggest to use calc by stewart Or thomson if ur beggner for learning how to use it
And 3blue1browns series of essence of calc for the intuitive reasoning
i didn’t use them for single variable calc but still
this as well
essence of calculus is essential
nice video series
great animations
to give an intuitive approach
i will look into these book
just type pdf at the end
you can find them online
U can go for spivak Or apostol once ur done with calc once but not if ur starting since they are too rigorous
yea definitely don’t do spivak right now lol
i just cannot apply it
Yup the best math youTuber
him or bprp
bprp is more fun
i guess
but 3b1b is more educational
bbrp
blackpenredpen
i will look it up
I tried to read it once Im still traumatized by it till this day
spivak is advanced calculus
And dont go for apostol too it's even harder than spivak 
It's more analysis based il try it again once I finish my calc 2 n 3 lol
it is analysis really
you haven’t even done calc2?
why are you reading spivak
tru lol
😭😭
Have I'm revising 
It was suggested by someone he said it's for beggingners

@last egret Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It seems as tho this is the wrong answer:
start by multiplying both sides by (x+2)(x+3)
and we get x^2+2x=3
then factor into
x^2+2x-3=0
(x+3)(x-1)=0
x=-3
x=1
dang, so the crossing was incorrect?
not sure but you solve these problems by canceling out the denominators of both sides usually
lemme see what happened
ok
oh yeah it is the cross multiplying
alright, I'll watch out for it
<@&268886789983436800>
Closed by @warm compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
hi
How does this not equal 52
ABE + EBC = 180
so 5r - 10 = 180
190/5 = 38
r=38
38(2)-20 is 52
it says m<EBC
ohk
so that means since BA and BC are opposite rays ABE and EBC add up to 180
so use the variables that means 3r+10 + 2r-20 = 180
yup
Okay and it says it's wrong
After I plug it in
For ABE which is congruent to EBF
wait im so dumb
38 x 2 is not 72
🙄
76-20 is 56
I stg if this is the answer
yep im done
i just wasted 30 minutes for a dumb multiplication error
this is wrong
ik
yup
its 56
I literally waited for 30 mins
Okay homework time is over
Im done for now
im sorry, I kind of went to another chat because I saw someone else take over here
💀
gl lol
Did you get assistance yet? I would be happy to help you out.
Got it. If you need anything, feel free.
@balmy oracle Has your question been resolved?
ye, pretty ssure the question has been solved
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
- In kindergarten, Viktoria and Emil each have a glass of juice with exactly the same amount of juice in each glass. However, Viktoria is not entirely happy because Emil's juice contains twice as much sugar as hers. The glasses are not so full that they cannot pour a little from one into the other, and smart as she is, Viktoria convinces Emil to play the following game: She pours $\frac{1}{9}$ of her juice into Emil's glass, asks him to stir it well, and then pour the same amount of juice back into her glass so that they again have the same amount of juice.
The mixing procedure described above is repeated several times. Let $x_n$ and $y_n$ be the amount of sugar in the glasses of Viktoria and Emil, respectively, after the procedure has been performed $n$ times.
a) Show that
$$
\begin{aligned}
x_{n+1} & =0.9x_n + 0.1y_n \
y_{n+1} & =0.1x_n + 0.9y_n
\end{aligned}
$$
b) Let $M$ be the matrix such that $\binom{x_{n+1}}{y_{n+1}} = M\binom{x_n}{y_n}$. Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of $M$. \
c) Write $\binom{2}{4}$ as a linear combination of eigenvectors of $M$, and find $M^n\binom{2}{4}$. \
d) How many times must the mixing procedure be performed for the ratio between the sugar content in Viktoria's juice and Emil's juice to be at least $0.95$?
Michael
Need assistance on d)
@dire hatch Has your question been resolved?
i don't know which direction the ratio is meant to go in
so idk if it is x_n = 0.95 y_n
or the other way around
or more
do I need to insert one of the previous equations?
So I should just make some values up?
they need to fulfil the condition that emil has twice viktorias
Yep
but other than that it's irrelevant how much exactly
as you want the ratio
and if you pick some value that is twice the intended value
for example let x_0 and y_0 be the intended values
then x_0 = 0.5 y_0
and you choose twice those values
since the condition needs to be met
you can just divide that out
that multiple
anyway
pick some numbers
yeah
Ahh
until instead of x_0 = 0.5 y_0 you get x_0 >= 0.95 y_0
and then I can use the result from c
Closed by @dire hatch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The text above this problem says “determine whether the function is continuous at the given values of c”
I honestly dont know how to start problem 2 all🥲
See i bet thats really helpful but i still just dont understand for some reason
I think bc there are so many terms im just getting really stuck

@plush flax Has your question been resolved?
draw a graph of the function and think about it and\or see if you get 1 when plugging in -1 in -x-1 (do the same for the other points c=0 and c=1 according to the function definition in each part)
@plush flax Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, how are you, could someone help me? Does anyone know how to solve this step by step?
integration by parts
@ancient condor Has your question been resolved?
I got this, sorry for the handwriting, sorry if it is not very understandable, I would like to know if what I did is right before evaluating the limits
At the bottom left there is an x^2 but you can't see it, sorry again
<@&286206848099549185>
@ancient condor Has your question been resolved?
@ancient condor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I proved this to be equal to x^n - y^n. Is there a way to translate it to the more traditional form which is on the second screenshot?
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@chrome nymph Has your question been resolved?
@chrome nymph Has your question been resolved?
@chrome nymph Has your question been resolved?
@chrome nymph Has your question been resolved?
since i>0 you can write (x-y)^i as (x-y) (x-y)^(i-1) and factor out the (x-y) from the sum
that would be the first step
then you would have to do another binomial expansion on (x-y)^(i-1) giving you a nested sum
I see that but I don't know how to go from that sum to the traditionally used one
im not sure i understand what youre fully trying to do
the nice thing about finding these two different representations if that you can equate the coefficients individually
giving you some perhaps interesting or otherwise useful results
I'm just trying to go from my form to the traditional form
\begin{align*}
x^2 - y^2 &= \sum_{i=1}^n {n \choose i} (x-y)^i y^{n-i} \
&= (x-y) \sum_{i=1}^n {n \choose i} (x-y)^{i-1} y^{n-i} \
&= (x-y) \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} {n \choose i+1} (x-y)^i y^{n-i-1} \
&= (x-y) \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} {n \choose i+1} \sum_{j=0}^i {i \choose j} x^j (-y)^{i-j} y^{n-i-1} \
&= (x-y) \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \sum_{j=0}^i {n \choose i+1} {i \choose j} (-1)^{i-j} x^j y^{n-j-1}
\end{align*}
ok so youre ok up to this?
looking through
Acman
missed a -1 whoops !
It will take a bit of time for me to understand
lines 1 and 2 of 4 look good
Line 3 of 4 looks good too
where did the (-y) go?
$(-y)^{i-j} y^{n-i-1} = (-1)^{i-j} y^{i-j} y^{n-i-1} = (-1)^{i-j} y^{n-j-1}$
Acman
ok the next step is going to be to change the order of summation, have you seen anything like that before
this table shows which pairs of (i, j) are summed over
do you see how this is working
the other sum goes from 0 to n-1, these are the rows
then the inside sum is j which goes from 0 to i
so for instance the term where i = 0 and j = 1 is not included because when i=0 the inside sum is j=0 to i=0
changing the order of summation is exactly what it sounds like, instead of doing i first we rewrite it we sum j first
we do this so that we can group all the coefficients of e.g. x^2 y^(n-3) together
Seems relatively straightforward
ok cool so we can look at this chart to see that the new summation will be [\sum_{j=0}^{n-1} \sum_{i=j}^{n-1}]
Acman
does that make sense ?
You sure the second sum will go up to n-1?
yep
look at the chart
summing i first is like going across the rows
summing j first is like going down the columns
and every column includes i=n-1
Oh yeah, I was trying to go in the opposite direction but the result would be the same
Continue please
\begin{align*}
x^n - y^n &= (x-y) \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \sum_{j=0}^i {n \choose i+1} {i \choose j} (-1)^{i-j} x^j y^{n-j-1} \
&= (x-y) \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} \sum_{i=j}^{n-1} {n \choose i+1} {i \choose j} (-1)^{i-j} x^j y^{n-j-1} \
&= (x-y) \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} x^j y^{n-j-1} \sum_{i=j}^{n-1} {n \choose i+1} {i \choose i-j} (-1)^{i-j} \
&= (x-y) \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} x^j y^{n-j-1} \sum_{i=0}^{n-j-1} {n \choose i+j+1} {i+j \choose i} (-1)^i
\end{align*}
Acman
but notice that the result we are trying to show is that
[x^n-y^n = (x-y) \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} x^j y^{n-j-1}]
so all we need to do from here to finish is show that
[\sum_{i=0}^{n-j-1} {n \choose i+j+1} {i+j \choose i} (-1)^i = 1 \quad \text{for } j=0, \dots, n-1]
Acman
this is what i was talking about here
we could treat that last equation as a new identify we found via this method
im not sure how you would otherwise prove that identity, probably can be done but i was never good at combi haha
Same, same
there are bunch of identities here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_coefficient#Identities_involving_binomial_coefficients
likely the key in one (or a combination of multiple) of them
I just wonder why we can't get rid of -1
wdym
We are supposed to have only pluses without minuses
We are not working with specific numbers here
no that was just an example
It should be true with just the variables too
my point is the fact that we have an alternating sum as the coefficient does not necessarily mean the coefficients will be altnerating themselves
look at this
the inner sum is the coefficient each x^j y^(n-j-1) term
like you say, we want them all to be 1
i dont think you have applied that identity correctly
I made k=i, r=2i + j + 1
correct but that is combinatorics
like this n+i+j C 2i+j+1
the issue is vandermonde is about a SUM of binom coefs
and since our sum is over i there should be no is left in the final expression
since its the summing variable
i dont think vandermondes can be applied to our sum
Okay I don't have the mental strength to deal with it right now. Unless someone else is interested in it I'm going to close the topic
.close
Closed by @chrome nymph
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
he
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's the formal proof of Riemann series theorem
elaborate
The one about being able to rearrange conditionally convergent series to whatever you want?
Ahh yes
I seem to understand all of it
Now how can I prove that the partial sums of the given sequence have superior y and inferior x
Sorry for not stating my question correctly 
Hello anyone

I think it all comes down to pn and qn being null series, even though their series diverge. So the amount you overshoot y when adding up the pn and the amount you undershoot x when subtracting the qn has to converge to zero
Why? Why can't it Ossicilate and never equal the converging value
what I dont really get in this proof is the need for these sequences xn and yn, why not just take constant x and y
it does oscillate
thats why we take limsup and liminf
they are just trying to show the idea of overshoot and undershoot using it
but each time the oscillation reaches x or y, it hits these numbers closer and closer
Uh? But then the series won't ever actually converge to the value we want
How can we show it hits closer and closer?
Yea but the rearrangement actually attains that value somewhere
At infinity

yeah we only want it to have a limit superior and a limit inferior, not necessarily a limit
because pn and qn are null sequences
pn -> 0 for n -> inf
Why can't pn approach infinity and qn approach - infinity
because the original series converges
so an is a null sequence
thus pn and qn as subsequences too
Can u elaborate I'm a little dumb 
you know what conditionally convergent means?
Yea that the series converges but the series formed by the mod of corresponding terms diverges
Also will in this case lim inf be equal to limsup
and for a series to converge, the sequence of summands has to be a null sequence
Ok
only if x = y
If x isn't equal to y then it's going to be a series that alternates between them never reaching a finite no?
yeah
Ok so the rearrangement of the original series may or may not be converging depending on lim inf and sup
I think I get it now thanks alot @static ember

.close
Closed by @chrome isle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!nopdf
Please post images (such as PNGs or JPGs) of the question rather than other filetypes such as PDFs which have to be downloaded. Non-image downloads can potentially contain viruses or other security risks.
Can u send some photos or smthng else can't really open the link
What's the name of the book?
I've heard it's name so il suggest to go with it since I don't know how ur proffesor teaches
Also teaching sequence series after limits is wierd cause we were taught that in calc 2
@light hazel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @light hazel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
try drawing a picture :3
this is what the scenario would look like. you want the green area
@flint zodiac Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why doenst it work? at the end i get 0 instead of 14pi
your first equality is incorrect
you rewrote sin(3x) / sin(x) as e^(3ix) / e^(ix), which simplifies to e^(2ix), or cos(2x) + i * sin(2x)
as you can see, what you ended up with is nothing like what you started with
to be precise, euler's formula states that e^(ix) = cos(x) + i * sin(x), which you understand to imply sin(x) = Im(e^(ix))
your issue comes from overextending this formula
to properly complexify this integral, you would use the identity sin(x) = (e^(ix) + e^(-ix))/(2i)
woah, i didnt know this formula existed
thanks
(here's the typical exponential forms of trigonometric expressions)
.close
Closed by @molten spindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Been trying this problem for awhile now.
like other problems i've inserted x into the function i can post my results
F(1) = 4.83
F(0.5) = 2.10
F(0.05) = 0.41
F(0.01) = 0.041
F(0.005) = 0.021
F(0.0005) = 0.0041
to my understanding the numbers should be really close to the answer but they're all over the place
@faint halo Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I think you've done most of the work here. Looking at the values of f(x) can you guess the limit ?
oh true
(and the actual limit)
No worries, good luck
.close
Closed by @faint halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would I just use these limits for 22c question I dont rlly know how to do the right limits when there isnt any lines on the right that go to the holes
And also for 23 how would I describe the right/left limits
@pine patrol Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
ok for 23
i assume they want right/left limits to converge on a point, preferably 0?
Im not sure but probably
So would I just say what the y is when x is 0 for the right and left sides @restive river
you would say that the limit as x approaches 0 from the right is 0
basically, i think?
based on what 23 looks like
is there any other descriptions for 23??
oh nvm
Ya that sounds right, but for 22 how would I do the right side for the open circle
No
the limits dont converge on a point
they are to describe the end behavior of postive and negative infinity
thats what it is
Im kinda confused
read b.
right side goes down forever (which is an unlimited number in negatives)
left side does the opposite
i hope you got the hint
22 has a lot of discontinuities, therefore, a. will be having some answers for 22
My teacher said there should be 4 limits
Dont I just do the left and right sides of both holes
Help plz
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@pine patrol Has your question been resolved?
@pine patrol Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pine patrol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you do gaussian elimination on a 5x4 or 4x5 matrix what???
same way you do it in general
The same way you would for a square matrix
That, or you can have row of zeros possibly
if i have a row of zeros post gaussian wouldnt that make it near impossible to solve for 5 variables
not if it's all zeros
if you have something like 0 0 0 0 0 | 1 then that means there's no solution
isee
ok ill throw myself at the problem and brb rq
ok this is hard
could I get some help starting the process?
first, you want the entries in the first column, rows 2 through 4, to be 0
so rather than go row by row look at the columns of 0s that need to occur?
same goes for R3 though...
^
you could, but the "standard" RREF should be the same size as the original
the last row will just be all zeros in this case
so it doesn't contribute anything to the solution
can an RREF be a REF?
yep
but then how can i solve for each variable individually
there's too many of them
or od i have to keep going to make the 2nd row just 2 vairables
wait waht
as you said, x5=3
yes
then the 2nd row tells you:
x3 + x4 + 2x5 = 0
plug in x5=3
that becomes:
x3 + x4 = -6
6
so you can let x4 be anything
but then theres an infinitely wide range of what they can be
yea there will be infinitely many solutions
because you have fewer equations than unknowns
like for example if i just gave you one equation with two unknowns, say:
x1 + x2 = 5
there are infinitely many solutions to that, right?
yes
same idea here
so when it says solve the linear system.
does that mean just simplify it as best as possible?
yea in this case it means you'll express x1, x3 and x5 as functions of x2 and x4
(x5 is just a constant, which is a trivial function)
start at the bottom and go up
x5 = 3
then
x3 + x4 + 2x5 = 0, so
x3 + x4 = -6
thus:
x3 = -x4 - 6
oh.
finally the top row
x1 = -x2 - x3 -x4 - x5 + 1
due to there being infinently many solns
plug in your expressions for x3 and x5
yep
ok!
i think i can try the next question on my own and see what i can do
if there's more variables than there are eqns
then its not a concrete answer
yea, there will either be infinitely many solutions or no solutions
(when there are more variables than equations)
Closed by @iron siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone please tell me if this is correct i have no idea why both 32,000 net profit
@vernal burrow Has your question been resolved?
Addition mistake in manufacturing top sheet
why is it mistake
manufacturing is decrease to 1,500,000
everything in the table is fixed costs
COGS is variables costs
Hmmm... Well just focus on the year 2 columns on both, total cost for the two sheets doesn't seem right...
Oh the COGS... The cogs are what balances the total production costs
ohhh so it is correct then?
Cuz fixed cost manufacturing gets lowered but COGS increases so it cancels out i think
Yes sir
Closed by @vernal burrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct
@humble sapphire Has your question been resolved?
Hello?
@humble sapphire Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @humble sapphire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
okay, I am going insane
is it true that $\coprod_{y \in Y} X$ is a discrete space?
higher!
or am I wasting my time trying to prove something that is false?
I'm really hoping it's true, otherwise my proof idea for part of this exercise is gonna fall flat on its face 
like, to prove it is discrete, it suffices to prove that every singleton in the disjoint union is open
so if ${(x,y)}$ is a singleton in the $y$th copy of $X$, then ${(x,y)} \cap X = \emptyset$ for every other copy of $X$ by the definition of the disjoint union
higher!
and \emptyset is open in X always
but if we intersect ${(x,y)}$ with its own copy of $X$, then we have problems
higher!
the intersection is just ${(x,y)}$ itself, so now I need to show that this singleton is open in the $y$th copy of $X$
I want to somehow use the fact that Y is discrete to do this, but I cannot figure out how for the life of me
does anybody have an idea, or a suggestion?
or you can tell me that the disjoint union space is actually not discrete and that I'm wasting my time 
I just need a direction to go in
higher!
Why do you think it's true
Have you tried an example yet
because it would make my life highly convenient
then I can say that ${\text{Id}|}X: \coprod{y \in Y} \to X$ is continuous
^
higher!