#help-27

1 messages · Page 232 of 1

latent mulch
#

Ok

#

So it's like this

#

Imma draw it

#

Wait

#

This guy

late kernel
#

@latent mulch ah that's simple trigonometry kiddo!

latent mulch
#

Though I asked you to help

late kernel
latent mulch
#

That's how I got my doubt cleared

#

All praise be to praiseworthy

late kernel
latent mulch
#

What grade you in

#

11th 12th?

#

Just get lost for a while

late kernel
latent mulch
#

I'm just about to get my doubt cleared

#

And @boreal helm 's just disappeared

#

You broke my flow

#

Get lost

#

@boreal helm You there?

#

May we continue?

#

Imma pick on you for a while till he comes

latent mulch
boreal helm
#

Okok

latent mulch
#

Ok hes come

boreal helm
#

Came

#

Okok

#

Yes tell

latent mulch
#

So

#

Where were you?

#

Why do you disappear?

#

@boreal helm ?

boreal helm
#

I am waiting

#

For u

#

To ask

latent mulch
#

Oh

boreal helm
#

I am here

latent mulch
#

I literally for what I was asking

#

Ifk

#

Idk

#

Wait

#

Lets see

#

So

#

120 is just 30

boreal helm
#

Okok

latent mulch
#

So I find 30

boreal helm
#

Yes 30

#

Wait imma show

latent mulch
#

In the 1st quadrant

latent mulch
#

Lemme figure it out

#

Myself

boreal helm
#

Okok

latent mulch
#

So I find 30

#

In the first quadrant

#

And the compare the coordinates

#

And the only difference there would be is of the signs right?

boreal helm
#

What

latent mulch
#

Since it's th3 same thing positioned in different quadrants

boreal helm
#

Did not understand

latent mulch
#

Wait

boreal helm
#

See it's correct

#

We add a reference

latent mulch
boreal helm
#

Like 120 is

#

90+30

#

150 is

#

90+60

latent mulch
#

Yeah

boreal helm
#

We add reference

#

150 is

#

180-30

#

120 is 180-60

#

Like this

latent mulch
#

Basically what we say in it's just x degrees rtated 90 degrees or whatever

#

So lemme draw

boreal helm
#

Okok

#

Draw imma see

latent mulch
#

Is it right?

#

@boreal helm

#

@boreal helm

#

@boreal helm

#

@boreal helm

#

@boreal helm

boreal helm
#

Absolutely my guy

latent mulch
#

Now

boreal helm
latent mulch
#

I've got a different question apart from my main question

#

So how we apply the concept of complementary angles to this relation is just derived

boreal helm
#

Okok

latent mulch
#

So -sin(90+30) = cos30 but shouldn't (90-30) be cos30 and not (90+30)

boreal helm
#

See

#

U had cos(30)

#

In first quad

latent mulch
#

Yeah

#

Yeah

boreal helm
#

u added 90 to it

latent mulch
#

Ok

boreal helm
#

Cos is -ve in 2nd

#

So cos(90+30) becomes -sin30

latent mulch
#

What? You just 17

latent mulch
boreal helm
#

Lol

latent mulch
#

I'm also 17 ok

#

I'm in 11th grade

latent mulch
#

What are you?

#

A boy who just recently hit puberty?

latent mulch
#

Good for you

boreal helm
#

Being into something does not guarantee u will excel into it 🗿

latent mulch
#

Lemme study now

#

You don't even know the conditions ive been through

#

I just started studying this year

#

So lemme clear my doubts

boreal helm
#

Oof

#

U guys

#

Fight so much chill

latent mulch
#

How do you apply physics to be smarter in social conditions?

boreal helm
#

What if he is saying something

#

We focus on our work

latent mulch
#

So do that

#

And stop acting like a child

#

Conserve energy

#

Go to sleep chhild

boreal helm
#

Lol

latent mulch
boreal helm
#

yes

#

You are correct

#

Indeed

latent mulch
#

Lol

#

Ok

boreal helm
#

Yes

#

cos(90-a) is sina

#

And cos(90+a) is -sina

latent mulch
#

Wow

boreal helm
#

U can look it in two ways

latent mulch
#

So derive that algebraically

boreal helm
#

As 90+a is

#

In 2nd quad

#

And in that cos is -ve

#

Or u can do this

#

Cos(90+a)

#

cos(90-(-a))

#

sin(-a)

#

-sina

latent mulch
#

Ooh

#

I get it now

#

OK

#

So onto my main question

#

Now that I've derived that relationship

#

How do I extend it to 180-a

boreal helm
#

First mark where will 180-a will be

#

U will understand

latent mulch
#

Ok

#

Wait

#

Do I have to do it on my ownM

#

Or are you doing it?

#

@boreal helm

boreal helm
#

Ues

#

Yes

#

Do it on your own

#

Try

#

Think

latent mulch
#

Ok

#

So lemme see

#

This is it

#

So

#

What do I know

#

I wanna write it in terms of theta

#

What are the coordinates of theta?

#

The same 180-A

#

Wait

#

(Sin180-a, cos180-a) are the coordinates

#

Now I wanna find in terms of theta

boreal helm
#

U are correct but see theta will be from +ve x axis

latent mulch
#

Theta lies in the first quadrant

boreal helm
#

And 180-a too from the +ve x axis

#

Yes

latent mulch
#

Here it's just the signs of theta are flipped

#

Since it's in a different quadrant

boreal helm
#

No

#

See

#

See in 2nd quad

#

The whole x axis

latent mulch
#

Is -ve

boreal helm
#

What

#

Yes

latent mulch
#

So the trig functions for x axis would be native only

boreal helm
#

See in 2nd quad we have angle from 90 to 180

latent mulch
#

Not for y axis

boreal helm
#

So see

latent mulch
#

Ok

boreal helm
#

If theta like 30 lies in first quad

#

And we want to write 150

#

We can write 180-30

#

We do this

#

Did u understand

#

@latent mulch

latent mulch
#

Yeah

boreal helm
#

See if it makes 30 in first quad

#

And we want to extend it to 2nd quad

#

We just sub it from 180

#

And angle comes in 2nd quad

latent mulch
#

Ok

#

Lets try

#

150 is also 90 + 60 so i can write it in terms of 60

#

Just with different signs

boreal helm
#

Bro

latent mulch
#

Is tjisnit?

boreal helm
#

Yes

#

U can refer it as both

#

180-30

#

Or 90+60

#

Both are valid

latent mulch
boreal helm
#

And both give Same result

#

It's wrong

latent mulch
#

Where did I go wrong?

boreal helm
#

U have done the opposite

#

See it's cost and sin t in first quad

#

So in second it become

#

cos(180-t),sin(180-t)

latent mulch
#

-cost and sint

#

Could you draw it yourself

boreal helm
#

Okok

latent mulch
#

And explain each step

boreal helm
#

This

latent mulch
#

Draw a bugger one bruh

boreal helm
#

Ook

latent mulch
#

Stop trynna save pages

boreal helm
#

Lol

latent mulch
#

Don't draw it all at once

#

Draw and explain each step

#

And also your line of thinking

boreal helm
#

Ok imma draw each step

latent mulch
boreal helm
#

U understand this?

latent mulch
#

Having a cute pfp doesn't imply it's a girl behind the acc. Hes male

latent mulch
#

Haha diapered

boreal helm
#

1 way to approach it

latent mulch
#

Bruh

boreal helm
#

Other way is

latent mulch
#

What's this

boreal helm
latent mulch
#

Bruh

#

Your handwritings so nice

#

Ok

#

I get it

#

Yes

boreal helm
#

Yes

latent mulch
#

90+A

boreal helm
#

Yes

#

Like in 120

#

90+30

#

A is

latent mulch
#

Yes

boreal helm
#

30*

latent mulch
#

Oh yes

#

Ok

boreal helm
#

Okok

#

Any more doubt

latent mulch
#

Ok

#

Go

#

Like 180-A?

#

How we apply it to 180-A

#

@boreal helm

boreal helm
#

180 - A is

#

See do u know the straight has an angle of 180 degree

latent mulch
#

Yes

boreal helm
latent mulch
#

Wtf is this bro

#

Cant you write any better

boreal helm
#

Okok

latent mulch
#

Draw big

#

Use pencil

#

Draw neat

#

Pls

boreal helm
latent mulch
#

Yes that's better

#

So what are you tryna say here

boreal helm
#

Counter clockwise theta is +ve

latent mulch
#

Clockwise is

#

Hahah

boreal helm
#

Lol

#

See here we took theta with respect to -x

#

So angle also -ve

latent mulch
#

Yes

#

Ok

boreal helm
#

U can see angle b/w +ve x and -ve x is 180

#

So if it makes theta with -ve

latent mulch
#

Yes

boreal helm
#

It should make 180-theta with the +ve x

latent mulch
#

Ok

boreal helm
#

<@&268886789983436800>

latent mulch
#

What happened

boreal helm
#

Wait

latent mulch
#

Ik starting to get a headache

#

Lol

boreal helm
#

Let someone come imma explain

latent mulch
#

How does it feel to spend 2.5 hours trynna explain something?

boreal helm
#

Good

#

Lol

latent mulch
#

No

boreal helm
#

Wait

#

Wait

latent mulch
#

Lol

#

Ni

boreal helm
#

Wait

latent mulch
#

I dont

#

I'm tired

boreal helm
#

Wait bro

#

I m not gonna talk

#

We need to report this to a mod

latent mulch
#

I'm having a headache

boreal helm
#

Wait

latent mulch
#

What do we need to report?

#

What happened?

#

@boreal helm ?

#

Huh?

boreal helm
#

Wait

latent mulch
#

Man I'm really tired

#

I swear

#

And my mother is also asking for the phone

boreal helm
#

Pls wait

latent mulch
#

What is it

boreal helm
#

We need to report toxic behaviour

latent mulch
#

I wanna get in the sun

boreal helm
#

Wait

latent mulch
#

Oh

#

Who you gon report?

#

Am I being reported?

boreal helm
#

No

#

Don't close

latent mulch
#

Ok

#

So i won't close

boreal helm
#

Wait let a mod come

latent mulch
#

And but I can't stay here e ither

#

I want to get in the sun

winter torrent
latent mulch
#

Keep it open

#

Oh finally

boreal helm
#

Thanks for coming mam

latent mulch
#

Pass judgment

boreal helm
#

U can see above MEDHAT has been talking trash and showing off toxic behaviour

#

Anonymous is witness

latent mulch
#

Haha

#

I'm witnesss

boreal helm
#

Tell anonymous what things did he say

latent mulch
#

Lol

#

He was talking about solving some equations

#

Like something like yhat

boreal helm
#

Proof

#

He has been interfering in this help channel too

winter torrent
#

my judgment is that this channel is a mile long full of both of you speaking past each other, without ever understanding. I'll check the logs and look through the channel some more. @boreal helm it feels like you're holding this person hostage, @latent mulch feel free to go whenever

latent mulch
#

Pass judgment

boreal helm
#

And did not listen when I told him to make another channel and did !occupied

#

Mam I have given the proof

#

Pls see it

tender cobalt
#

entirely relatable if I was 3 years younger

latent mulch
#

It seems so court like

boreal helm
#

I was being professional

tender cobalt
#

the reference triangle you draw for 180 - theta is incorrect

boreal helm
#

Oof

latent mulch
#

Wait

tender cobalt
#

thats pretty much the reason why it doesnt work

latent mulch
#

What?

boreal helm
#

No one saw bout medhat

#

Why

latent mulch
#

Could ya explain?

#

But I have to leave

tender cobalt
#

I cant explain if youre not here

latent mulch
#

Could ya explain in dms

tender cobalt
#

oh sure

latent mulch
#

I'll check em later

#

Can you?

tender cobalt
#

not really

#

you havent really said how you drew that triangle or why you think its correct

latent mulch
#

Can I tag you later?

tender cobalt
#

yep

latent mulch
#

Ok

tender cobalt
latent mulch
#

@tender cobalt

tender cobalt
#

yea thats my tag

winter torrent
#

dead

boreal helm
#

i presented the proof

#

The ss

latent mulch
#

My lord

boreal helm
#

My lord

latent mulch
#

Forgive that child's child like behavior

boreal helm
#

Did the correct decision i feel

latent mulch
#

Hes a little too ahead of himself

boreal helm
#

No

#

No he's not

#

His intention was to make fun and show off his knowledge

#

He was toxic

latent mulch
#

He thinks he's on top of the world because he's studying some advanced stuff

boreal helm
#

Always be professional

latent mulch
#

It happens my lord

boreal helm
#

And I being a deemed lawyer

tender cobalt
#

of the view posts I saw it didnt seem outwardly toxic, but it does seem customary for anyone who uses discord for too long

latent mulch
boreal helm
#

Proved that he was guilty

tender cobalt
#

truly cornered him at the stand

boreal helm
#

Bro he was laughing at a high schooler

tender cobalt
#

justice has served once again

boreal helm
#

He was calling me and him daft

latent mulch
#

Lol

#

I don't see it

boreal helm
#

A diapered kid and what not

latent mulch
#

What's the judgment

#

Oh herald of justice

boreal helm
#

He got banned my friend

latent mulch
tender cobalt
#

and his posts got deleted from here at least

#

damnatio memoriae

latent mulch
tender cobalt
#

yea sure

latent mulch
#

Like what's the time there?

boreal helm
#

Lord Hayley did the judgement

latent mulch
#

Idk I might be online in lime 6-8 hrs

tender cobalt
latent mulch
#

Wpuld you be there?

#

11:46 ist

tender cobalt
#

as suspected

latent mulch
#

Am

#

So when can I tag you?

tender cobalt
#

just go tag me in DMs

latent mulch
#

Maybe doing you would be better

tender cobalt
#

when I respond, thats when Im ready

boreal helm
#

Okok

latent mulch
#

Ok

boreal helm
#

You add him

#

So u can get your doubt cleared

#

Add me too

#

And then we close this

#

It's been 2 hours

tender cobalt
#

Ive had longer

latent mulch
#

Almost 3 hrs

boreal helm
#

Lol

#

Fast

latent mulch
boreal helm
#

Add me friend

#

So u can dm me

latent mulch
#

Ohk

boreal helm
#

Ohk

#

Add mtt too

latent mulch
#

Thanks for banging your head on a wall for 3 hrs for me

boreal helm
#

And bye and don't forget

#

To close

latent mulch
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @latent mulch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

boreal helm
#

We always here to help

#

❤️ yes

latent mulch
#

Yeah thanks

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

willow moat
#

Hello if anyone is available I'd like to ask if this is correct. I'm not sure if I did it right. Thank you.

willow moat
polar chasm
#

If you mean 33)

willow moat
#

Thank you. Also I need help on this other problem, idk how to do it

#

No 32

polar chasm
#

I can't see 32)

willow moat
#

Number 13

willow moat
polar chasm
#

Firstly, it's 3*3*3*7

#

so your a will be 3^3, and your b should be just 7, and not 21.

#

talking about this

willow moat
#

So it'll just be 3x3x7?

polar chasm
#

not quite, let's do it from scratch then

#

$-7\sqrt[3]{-189}$

woven radishBOT
#

MæthIsAlwaysRight

polar chasm
#

So we need to simplify this expression here

#

Firstly, note that there is a minus sign inside the cube root. What can you do to get rid of it?

willow moat
#

I can use imaginary i?

#

A friend told me the negatives cancel each other, idk if it's true or not

polar chasm
#

first hint

woven radishBOT
#

MæthIsAlwaysRight

polar chasm
woven radishBOT
#

MæthIsAlwaysRight

willow moat
#

Sorry I dont know how to do that method. I was never taught by my teacher

#

They taught me something like this:

polar chasm
willow moat
willow moat
#

She said that if I had 4 of the same number then I can take it out since the number to the root sign is 4

polar chasm
woven radishBOT
#

MæthIsAlwaysRight

polar chasm
#

root of a product is product of roots

#

root(ab) = root(a) * root(b)

#

But you can actually cheat it up a bit, and realize that -189 is same as -1 * -1 * -1 * 189. Now you have -1 there 3 times, so according to the method your teacher taught you, you can take it out

willow moat
#

So then it would be like this?

#

I took the -1 out so it should multiply to -7 and then I just simplify 189?

polar chasm
#

Yep

#

So it would be $7\sqrt[3]{189}$

woven radishBOT
#

MæthIsAlwaysRight

polar chasm
#

now can you factorize 189?

willow moat
#

Let me see

#

Yes

#

3 and 63 square root

#

Then I factorize 63

polar chasm
#

right

#

so what is 63 when factorized?

willow moat
#

3 square root 7

polar chasm
willow moat
#

3 (square root 7)

#

Like the root sign

#

Or cube root

polar chasm
#

cube root would be better

polar chasm
#

$\sqrt[3]{189}$?

woven radishBOT
#

MæthIsAlwaysRight

willow moat
#

3 cube root 21

polar chasm
#

I quite don't see what you are thinking of

#

but 3 cube root 21 shouldn't arise anywhere during the process

willow moat
#

I got square root 9 times square root 7 times square root 3 for square root 189

#

Square root 9 is 3 and square root 7 times square root 3 is square root 21

polar chasm
#

*cube root

#

you need to compute the cube root

#

not square root

willow moat
#

Sorry I keep forgetting

polar chasm
#

so cube root 9 is not 3

#

and that one step fails

#

$\sqrt[3]{189}=\sqrt[3]{3\cdot3\cdot3\cdot7}$

woven radishBOT
#

MæthIsAlwaysRight

polar chasm
#

this is the factorization of 189, you already had this at some point, right?

willow moat
#

Yes

polar chasm
#

how many 3's are there?

#

inside the cube root

willow moat
#

3

#

So I take it out to multiply to the 7 outside?

polar chasm
#

right

#

$7\sqrt[3]{189}=7\sqrt[3]{3\cdot3\cdot3\cdot7}=7\cdot3\sqrt[3]{7}$

woven radishBOT
#

MæthIsAlwaysRight

polar chasm
#

it should look like this

#

for now

willow moat
#

Yes

polar chasm
#

and 7*3 is 21

#

so $21\sqrt[3]{7}$

woven radishBOT
#

MæthIsAlwaysRight

willow moat
#

Yes I got the same answer

#

I will try to do another problem like this but instead of 3 its 7

#

Thank you for help

polar chasm
#

np

willow moat
#

I got this for 15

#

I used the same method you used

#

Number 17

devout snowBOT
#

@willow moat Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @willow moat

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

queen pike
#

How do i find the latus rectum solely from the curve equation?

queen pike
#

I completely forgot

#

I know how to get the area, im just having trouble on how to get the latus rectum

devout snowBOT
#

@queen pike Has your question been resolved?

winter torrent
#

put it in the form $x - h = a(y-k)^2$ and your vertex will be at $(h, k)$ with the centerline being the horizontal line going through that so $y = k$

woven radishBOT
#

hayley 🥥 🌴

devout snowBOT
#

@queen pike Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vital night
#

Hello, I would like an explanation as to why these two linear combinations share the same plane in xyz space?

devout snowBOT
#

@vital night Has your question been resolved?

magic thicket
#

show one plane contains the spanning set of the other

vital night
#

sorry what

#

I'm taking an introductory course to linear algebra

magic thicket
#

you've never heard the terminology of spanning set?

vital night
#

i have

#

do I need to see that they have the same spanning set in xyz space?

magic thicket
#

that's one way to prove it yes

vital night
#

alright thank you!

magic thicket
devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vital night

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

patent abyss
#

find the value of √x +1/√x if the value of x = 9+4√5

dapper fable
#

what are you stuck on?

glossy basalt
#

!status

devout snowBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
patent abyss
#

the answer is coming in whole value but not mine

dapper fable
#

(i would reccommend turning 9 + 4√5 into a perfect square)

patent abyss
#

its coming sqrt(9+4√5) + sqrt(9-4√5)

#

is there any property like (a+b) + (a-b)

dapper fable
#

?

patent abyss
#

got it

dapper fable
dapper fable
#

to simplify and sqrt it

patent abyss
#

my answer is coming √18

#

which is not whole value

dapper fable
#

incorrect

patent abyss
#

i know

dapper fable
#

you missed the 2ab in (a + b)^2 = a^2 +2ab + b^2

patent abyss
#

u r right

#

36?

dapper fable
#

2sqrt(5)

patent abyss
#

can you wait for 5 min i am gonna create my sol in image

dapper fable
#

alr

patent abyss
#

got it

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @patent abyss

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

patent abyss
#

bye

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

eternal adder
devout snowBOT
eternal adder
#

tips for finding OD?

devout snowBOT
#

@eternal adder Has your question been resolved?

eternal adder
#

<@&286206848099549185>

drifting sierra
#

There's a solution that uses simple geometry and another that uses a system of equation with vectors

eternal adder
#

tried many ways, seem so close but cant get it

eternal adder
#

prob something with E being the midpoint of AC, it probably gives it some unique properties?

drifting sierra
#

ABC is a triangle. AD is a median, M is the midpoint of AD. BM intersects AC in F.
H is the fourth vertex of the parallelogram ADCH (so AH parallel to CD, and CH parallel to DA).

#

H is on BM because M is the midpoint of BH by construction

#

E is the intersection of CH and BA. Triangles AHE and ABD are congruent. That means AE = AB so CA is a median of BCE, and HE = HC = AD, so BH is also a median of BCE

eternal adder
#

what does AD as a median mean

drifting sierra
#

It just means D is the midpoint of BC

eternal adder
#

but its not

#

it seems like the diagram u made is off

#

D shouldnt be connected to A in your diagram

#

assuming E is the O

drifting sierra
#

This diagram is not related to yours

eternal adder
#

o ok

drifting sierra
#

It's a proof that CF = 2AF

#

You can then use that in your problem, with the appropriate letters

#

Since you didn't know what a median is, I assume you also didn't know that the medians of a triangle intersect at a point called the centroid, and that this centroid trisects the three medians

eternal adder
#

oh wow

drifting sierra
#

The other solution uses a system of equations: D is on both CB and OE, so, as vectors, CD = pCB and OD = qOE. You can add that OC = 2a+b, and you get the system { OD = q(3/2 a + b), OD = 2a + b + p*b }

#

It's not really a system, just OD written two different ways

#

But from that you can find q and p

eternal adder
#

but how does it prove CF = 2AF

#

algebrically

#

how does the diagram prove CF = 2AF algebrically

eternal adder
drifting sierra
#

That's a known property of medians

#

the medians of a triangle intersect at a point called the centroid, and that this centroid trisects the three medians

drifting sierra
eternal adder
#

ok

drifting sierra
#

I'm off, good luck

eternal adder
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @eternal adder

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

eternal adder
#

.reopen

devout snowBOT
#

devout snowBOT
#

@eternal adder Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

viral lynx
devout snowBOT
viral lynx
#

I think I know vaguely what im supposed to do but I dont know specifics

#

Like I thinl I need to ignore either x(t) and y(t) (I cant remember which one) and then take the second derivative of the other one

#

And set it equal to 0

#

But yeah not sure

restive river
#

loosely speaking tangent line is vertical if |dy/dx| = infinity. So this happens when dy/dt is finite and dx/dt is zero.

viral lynx
#

loosely speaking tangent line is vertical if |dy/dx| = infinity
Why sry?

faint gorge
#

vertical x'(t) = 0 and y'(t) != 0

restive river
#

but I think that is not the point of this question

viral lynx
#

So I can work it out myself next time

faint gorge
#

You can rotate the coordinate system and notice that you would then maximize/minimize now for x

viral lynx
faint gorge
viral lynx
faint gorge
#

usually you would do y' = 0 for horizontal tangent

#

now if you flip the coordinate system and flip variables

#

you would do now x' = 0

#

if that makes sense

viral lynx
#

Ok I see

viral lynx
viral lynx
#

Cause its the max / min of the tangent

faint gorge
#

you can

#

I mean it's a circle

#

so you would expect two solutions one with max x and one with min x

#

graphically speaking

viral lynx
faint gorge
#

I would ignore the 2nd derivative

#

I know graphically I can expect two get two solutions because there are two vertical lines

viral lynx
#

Ok I got the answers

#

(2, 1) and (-2, 1)

#

Which looks correct

faint gorge
#

yea it is

viral lynx
#

But I am still a bit stuck on this method sry

faint gorge
viral lynx
#

Why not the second derivative? Its the tangent (which we get by taking the derivative) and we want the min / max of the tangent (which we get by taking the derivative again)

#

Sry I know you already explain it but im still a bit stuck

faint gorge
#

You can calculate the 2nd derivative to really assure that it's a max or min

#

I just skipped it

viral lynx
#

But then we just have the tangent? Which could be anywhere on the circle right?

faint gorge
#

because looking at the first derivative -4t² + 4 = 0 would get me two solutions

#

so I could assumme these are the solutions for my vertical lines

faint gorge
#

these are vertical tangents

viral lynx
#

Ok.. so derivative of x(t) gives vertical tangents and derivative of y(t) gives horizontal tangents?

faint gorge
#

only if x'(t) = 0

viral lynx
faint gorge
#

set it to 0

#

Let me show you

woven radishBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

faint gorge
#

That's your curve right

#

If we differentiate it wrt time we get the tangent vector

woven radishBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

viral lynx
#

Yes the velocity

faint gorge
#

If x' = 0

#

and y' != 0

#

in which direction does (0, any number) show

viral lynx
#

Ummmm

faint gorge
#

think about it

#

(0,1) (0,-2) etc.

viral lynx
#

I mean I'm guessing the answer is 1?

faint gorge
#

???

viral lynx
#

Oh

faint gorge
#

in which direction

viral lynx
#

Ahhh

faint gorge
#

up, left right, horizontal, vertical?

#

if you draw that vector into the coordinate system

#

it always shows vertically

viral lynx
#

How come sry

faint gorge
#

draw it

viral lynx
#

OK 1 moment

faint gorge
#

(0,1) means for example 0 steps on the x axis

#

1 step on the y axis

#

so we go only up

#

which is vertical

viral lynx
#

Okkkkkkkk

#

I get it now

faint gorge
#

it's vague

#

Let $t_0$ be a solution so that $$x'(t_0) = 0 \textbf{ and } y'(t_0) \neq 0$$

woven radishBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

viral lynx
#

Yepyep I get it

faint gorge
#

Then the tangent vector shows either up or down

#

on that point

viral lynx
#

Ok I understand now

#

Haha sry that took a while

#

Thank you!

#

❤️

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @viral lynx

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

faint gorge
devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

humble glacier
#

For what value of a, the lines 2x+3y=1, x+y=3, and ax-4y=6 are concurrent?

restive river
#

Well the approach is to find the intersection of the lines 2x+3y=1 and x+y=3, then find the value of a such that the line ax-4y=6 also goes through that intersection point

humble glacier
#

by using matrix

restive river
#

By solving the linear system (substitution, matrix etc.)
Then substitute x and y into ax-4y=6 and solve for a

#

When solving the linear system use whichever method you want to use or are supposed to use

humble glacier
#

is this correct?

restive river
#

Yes your approach there is correct

humble glacier
#

what do i do from the last step?

restive river
#

You already have ±(58-8a)=0 right

#

if I read correctly

humble glacier
#

yes

restive river
#

±(58-8a)=0 is equivalent to 58-8a=0 so a = 58/8

humble glacier
#

by doing this way i got -7/4

restive river
#

both approaches should yield the same result unless you made an algebraic mistake somewhere

#

I'll check the first approach again though

humble glacier
restive river
#

Seems like you made an algebraic mistake in your first image

#

I still got 7/4 using the first approach disregard

humble glacier
#

i found my mistake

#

i did mistake in finding the determinant of 3x3 matrix.

restive river
#

I only knew that the matrix approach had a mistake since the second approach seems safer to me and I can easier guarantee that the second result is correct
I can't really check the first one closely because I'm in kind of a rush and the det formula is more complicated

#

Both approaches should yield the same result if everything is right

humble glacier
#

thanks. the answer is actually -7/4

#

.close.

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @humble glacier

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

upbeat isle
#

can someone please help me with D (d.1, d.2 and d.3) of this question

devout snowBOT
#

@upbeat isle Has your question been resolved?

upbeat isle
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @upbeat isle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ancient sluice
#

Hello i need help solving a biquadratic using Ferraris method

ancient sluice
#

x⁴-8x³-12x²+60x+63 = 0

#

I have done some work but I think I messed up somewhere coz I'm facing weird values

dense lynx
#

are you required to use ferrari method?

ancient sluice
#

Yeah bro

#

Else I have a root , -1

#

By trial method

#

Can reduce it to cubic and apply cardanos , or straight use Descartes

#

I am facing really weird values while solving using Ferraris

dense lynx
#

are u able to post work?

ancient sluice
#

Yeah one moment

#

Lower part number 4

#

I also have that lambda is between (-8,-7)

devout snowBOT
#

@ancient sluice Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@ancient sluice Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

restive river
#

Problem 8

devout snowBOT
solid osprey
#

does a,b,c have to be diffrent?

#

like whats stopping us for a=1 b=0 c=0

restive river
#

Algebra

solid osprey
#

am i wrong :3

solid osprey
torn bane
#

kind of abusing how the question is phrased

restive river
#

Idk how to do it

solid osprey
#

i meannn :shrug:

solid osprey
stable cloak
restive river
solid osprey
torn bane
#

the way it is phrased implies that it's the same

eager nova
#

There are no other solutions

#

The exercise is correctly written

#

It says real a, b, c

restive river
#

So for something like this I do that?

#

No algebra?

solid osprey
#

err

eager nova
#

You have to prove the are no other real solutions than {1, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 0} and {0, 0, 1}

solid osprey
#

$a,b,c\leq1$

woven radishBOT
#

Skill_Issue

eager nova
#

Well that is the exercise

solid osprey
#

we can easily get that

polar chasm
restive river
eager nova
#

Hint: You have odd number of numbers

restive river
#

I understand not

eager nova
#

What happens when you square or cube a number < 1?

restive river
#

It gets smaller

eager nova
#

So you can know that

#

a^2 is different from a^3 right?

#

It is greater

restive river
#

Yea

eager nova
#

a^2 > a^3

#

b^2 > b^3

#

c^2 > c^3

solid osprey
#

err wouldnt it be >=

restive river
#

Oh

eager nova
#

So we proved that a^2+b^2+c^2=a^3+b^3+c^3 is false when they are less than 1

eager nova
solid osprey
eager nova
#

Now you prove for >1

eager nova
#

If they are 0 they cant be equal to 1

solid osprey
#

:p ok

restive river
#

No

#

My bad

restive river
#

Other way

#

Yes

eager nova
#

Same reasoning

restive river
#

Ohh

#

Okay

#

I understand

#

Ty

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @drowsy spruce

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

peak imp
#

how would I calculate average velocity with the given information?

peak imp
#

I'm covering a section regarding instantaneous rate of change and was cruising along but then I got a curveball asking for average velocity

#

I calculated the instantaneous rate of change, but from the lecture I'm watching, I'm not sure how I use that info to find the average velocity

#

the book gives this definition:

#

so in this question, the time interval "a" would be 0.1 0.01 and 0.001?

#

and t would be 2.1 2.01 2.001?

eternal dove
#

Ok, to find the AVG velocity. First, tell me what is the initial velocity?

peak imp
#

95 ft/s

eternal dove
peak imp
#

126ft

eternal dove
#

👍🏼. That value will be used as the final velocity.

peak imp
#

thats not a velocity though, thats just a measure of disposition

#

nevermind i figured it out using the book

#

(128.94-126) / 2.1-2 = 29.4

#

position of ball at 2.1 seconds minus position at 2 seconds, divided by the incremental time difference

#

thanks

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @peak imp

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

plucky kernel
devout snowBOT
plucky kernel
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @plucky kernel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

agile garnet
devout snowBOT
agile garnet
#

i is incenter

#

g is centriod

#

r1 is exradius of incenter opposite to A

grizzled yew
#

follows from IG||BC iff AB+AC=2BC

#

i forgot how to prove it, but idt think theres a super clean way. barybash or lengthbash should work

devout snowBOT
#

@agile garnet Has your question been resolved?

agile garnet
#

thx

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @agile garnet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

solid osprey
#

how can i derivate $\frac{x}{x+\frac{1}{x}}$

woven radishBOT
#

Skill_Issue

solid osprey
#

i can see its $x(x+x^{-1})^{-1}$

woven radishBOT
#

Skill_Issue

solid osprey
#

for the outer one, do i do the chain rule first or product rule?

cold bone
#

it's better to use $\frac{x^{2}}{x+1}$

woven radishBOT
cold bone
solid osprey
cold bone
#

multiplying x with both numerator and denominator

solid osprey
#

but wont that give $\frac{x^2}{x^2+1}$

woven radishBOT
#

Skill_Issue

cold bone
#

x^2 imean

cold bone
solid osprey
#

oh

#

can i make it $1-\frac{1}{x^2+1}$ to make it even simpler?

woven radishBOT
#

Skill_Issue

cold bone
#

definitely

#

as you wish

solid osprey
#

ok

cold bone
solid osprey
solid osprey
cold bone
#

no

cold bone
solid osprey
#

oh

solid osprey
woven radishBOT
#

Skill_Issue

solid osprey
#

this?

cold bone
#

it will be positive

solid osprey
#

huh

#

why

#

ohh sorry

cold bone
solid osprey
#

$(x^2+1)^{-2}(2x)$

woven radishBOT
#

Skill_Issue

solid osprey
#

so this?

cold bone
#

yeah

solid osprey
#

alr, ty

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @solid osprey

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

outer talon
devout snowBOT
outer talon
#

Can anyone help with the first step on part (ii)

#

I get they use the hint, We know dAt = Wt dt

#

but not sure how they make Wt dt = d(tWt) - td(Wt)

hollow ice
#

product rule on d tWt

#

just basic calc

#

d tWt = t dWt + Wt dt

#

and rearrange

outer talon
#

ahhh of course

#

thanks

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @outer talon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ember patrol
#

Does it make sense to say $\abs{f(x)}\rvert_{-\infty}^{\infty}= \sum_ {-\infty}^{\infty} \abs{f(x)}$?

woven radishBOT
#

KySquared

sand dove
#

wut

ember patrol
#

(Also how would I be able to make the “evaluated at” bar larger?)

sand dove
#

the RHS definitely makes no sense

#

and LHS isn't defined to me either

ember patrol
#

The LHS is just the derivative of the absolute integrability test

#

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \abs{f(x)} dx < \infty$

winter patrol
#

try \eval_{a}^{b}

woven radishBOT
#

KySquared

ember patrol
#

Then I tried to check if f converged absolutely which is how I got to the RHS

sand dove
woven radishBOT
#

rafilou2003

ember patrol
#

Right

#

I figured since infinity exceeds all possible numbers perhaps I could cheat and write it as a summation

sand dove
#

definitely not

#

and even so your summation would be over what?