#help-27

1 messages · Page 214 of 1

woven radishBOT
#

TheKingPin

gaunt galleon
#

that is just a tautology

dire slate
#

oh

gaunt galleon
#

back to the example: let's assume a > b is true and there is some c such that a+c <= b+c

#

it follows from a+c <= b+c that (b+c)-(a+c) >= 0

#

but this means that b - a >= 0 which is equivalent to saying a <= b

#

a <= b is exactly the same as "not a > b"

#

so we have a contradiction

#

in this case you can also do a direct proof, but ultimately it doesn't matter, because $A \implies B$ is logically equivalent to $(A \land \neg B) \implies \neg A$

woven radishBOT
#

belabutter

gaunt galleon
#

if you aren't convinced still, fill out the truth tables for $A \implies B$ and $(A \land \neg B) \implies \neg A$ and you will see that they are equivalent

woven radishBOT
#

belabutter

dire slate
#

had to write it down to see it

#

so what i gathered

#

you have the implication, you went with the proof by contradiction which assumed the left side is true and the right side false

#

you worked through it and somehow found a piece that showed information that contradicted the left side of the implication a > b

gaunt galleon
#

yes

dire slate
#

oh wait, you went with the a and not b approach which is the same thing

gaunt galleon
#

yes

dire slate
#

i get the approach

#

but its not intuitive

gaunt galleon
#

you will get used to it by seeing more examples

#

and proving things by contradiction yourself

dire slate
#

true, it seems like its something you have to know ahead that its going to contradict and not something you just work throuhg

gaunt galleon
#

not always

#

sometimes you just assume A and not B and see where it leads

dire slate
#

so where in your work did you use your idea (A and notB) implies notA?

gaunt galleon
#

so A and not B is what i assumed

#

you mean my example right?

dire slate
#

yes

#

i saw the inital a implies b and then you went with a and not b

gaunt galleon
#

right, i am trying to prove A implies B

#

in this case: a>b implies a+c>b+c for all c

dire slate
#

right

gaunt galleon
#

not B in this case is there is some c such that a+c <= b+c

dire slate
#

right

gaunt galleon
#

by definition of <= this would imply that (b+c)-(a+b) >= 0

#

in a written proof i would have the double sided arrow on the left side of each step

#

(b+c)-(a+b) >= implies b-a >= 0

dire slate
#

oh, i see it now

#

so for the contradiction proof, you start with the statement that you assume true which is (A and notB) and with this information youre trying to prove notA which you do

gaunt galleon
#

yes

dire slate
#

ok

gaunt galleon
#

one reason why proof by contradiction can be useful is that the for all quantifier gets turned to an existential quantifier when negated

#

so in this case i just need a single c for which a+c>b+c doesn't hold, instead of proving a+c>b+c for all possible values of c

dire slate
#

right

gaunt galleon
#

the classic example for a proof of contradiction would be proving that there are infinitely many primes

#

in that case too, you assume there are finitely many primes and then that leads to a contradiction.

#

a finite amount of primes are easier to handle than infinite primes

dire slate
#

I see why (A and notB) implies notA is a contradiction. Because we assume A and notB is true which makes A true. So if we assume its true and then find that notA is also true at the same time thats why its a contradiction

gaunt galleon
#

exactly!

dire slate
#

that makes sense, thats why its called proof by contradiction

gaunt galleon
#

yup

dire slate
#

just using A and notB would be proof by a negation

#

this is making sense now

gaunt galleon
#

great

dire slate
#

so, is this format for all logical statements?

gaunt galleon
#

wdym?

dire slate
#

instead of A implies B, lets say we have A and B, would the proof by contradiction be (notA or notB) implies A?

#

since the negation of A and B is not A or not B and we're trying to prove a contradiciton so imply not A is true and lead to A also being true?

#

which also leads to a contradiction

gaunt galleon
#

my understanding of proving things is that you take some assumptions A and show that B follows from those

#

i don't think you would prove something like "A and B"

dire slate
#

ah, so proof start with an implication

gaunt galleon
#

yes

dire slate
#

good enough with me

#

that answers all my questions unless you have anything to add?

gaunt galleon
#

yes

#

ima go to bed now, good night ❤️

dire slate
#

thank you so much for the help

#

get some good rest

#

good night

gaunt galleon
#

np

dire slate
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dire slate

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

prisma pendant
#

I need help with a maff question 🙂
X produces 50l waste water every 1.2 seconds.
Y need to take a supply of 100l waste water every 0.5 seconds.

The fact that Y has a production rate of 0.5s and X has a production rate of 1.2s confuses me in this matter and I can't figure out how to pair the two together whilst having no backlog in either blocks and Y block is not being overfilled at any point by X.

Finding out the optimal number of X's compared to Y's would be great! (Like, if the most optimal numbers would be 9 X's to 2 Y's, if you understand).

devout snowBOT
#

@prisma pendant Has your question been resolved?

prisma pendant
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

Idk what that means, what slope?

devout snowBOT
#

@prisma pendant Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@prisma pendant Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tall mist
#

I just came across a fault in my work. To solve for B in y=mx+b I got two answers...
y-mx=b and y/mx=b
The second one is what I originally thought it was because m and x are multiplying each other but when I do the other way of subtracting y I get y-mx=b

tiny oyster
#

its the first one

#

y-mx=b

#

if thats what you are asking

#

you can only divide if the mx was multiplying with the b

tall mist
#

so with mx, we are just assuming they are adding each other and not multiplying?

#

I dont understand

#

Or is it just a rule that we only divide if its multiplied towards the targeted variable?

tiny oyster
#

$ab=y, b = \frac{y}{a}$
$b-a=y, b = y + a$

tall mist
#

Like for example if it's like s+pieR^2 H and solving for H it would be s/pieR^2=H because they are multiplying each other?

tiny oyster
#

i can't explain because to be honest i don't completely understand your problem, is your issue why we subtracted mx and not divided it ?

tall mist
#

Yes

tiny oyster
#

its because you can't actually divide, it will cause the equation to be weird and hectic

#

try doing so

#

divide both sides by mx

tall mist
#

y=mx+b
y/mx=b

#

I don't understand whats so wrong about this answer since it divides the Multipication

tiny oyster
tiny oyster
tall mist
#

I see, I think I sorta understand

#

So with another example problem like if it's like s=pieR^2 H and solving for H it would be s/pieR^2=H because they are multiplying each other?

tiny oyster
#

s+pieR^2 H = ?

#

you can't solve for something if it isnt an equation

#

oaky

#

okay*

tall mist
#

Sorry forgot to capitalize

tiny oyster
#

you're fine

tall mist
#

to make it an equal sign

tiny oyster
#

yes thats correct

tall mist
#

So that would be fine?

tiny oyster
#

yes thats fine

tall mist
#

Okay, I think I understand now, thanks for the help

tiny oyster
#

no problem

tall mist
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tall mist

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bold harbor
#

Hi, I would love to have some help with part 2 of this qustion, thanks!

bold harbor
#

plz help

devout snowBOT
#

@bold harbor Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

smoky gyro
#

a sum of $1000 is invested at the beginning of each year in superannuation fund. at the end of 30 years, how much will be available if the interest rate is 12% p.a?

smoky gyro
#

i dont get what to do

lost laurel
#

,w superannuation

lost laurel
#

so compound interest ?

smoky gyro
#

its superannuatinon

#

idk

lost laurel
#

what's that

#

,w define superannuation

smoky gyro
#

isnt that common in every country?

lost laurel
#

I've never heard of it

#

ok, so this is basically a compound interest problem

#

with the principal amount being 1000

winter patrol
#

there's an annuities formula

lost laurel
#

It's a GP

smoky gyro
#

yeah i know i have to do GP stuff

#

but i dont know whats going on

lost laurel
#

ok, so what's the formula for sum

smoky gyro
#

for money

#

?

#

idk

lost laurel
#

for a GP

smoky gyro
#

um

#

a(r^n-1)/r-1

lost laurel
#

good

#

use that here

#

a=1000

smoky gyro
#

why is a 1000?

unborn atlas
smoky gyro
#

per annum

unborn atlas
#

so like per year?

lost laurel
smoky gyro
#

um

lost laurel
#

oh

#

right

#

1000 at the beginning of each year

#

hmm

#

you can define this as $a_n= 1.12(a_{n-1})+1000$

#

right?

woven radishBOT
#

ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know

smoky gyro
#

no i dont know what that is

lost laurel
#

the amount at the nth year

#

is 1.12 the amount in the previous year

#
  • 1000
#

so the amount at the end of 30 years is $1.12(a_{29})+1000$

unborn atlas
#

1.12

lost laurel
#

my bad

unborn atlas
#

😭

lost laurel
#

like this you can derive a general formula in terms of $a_1$

woven radishBOT
#

ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know

#

ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know

lost laurel
#

so this is $1.12(1.12(a_28)+1000$

woven radishBOT
#

ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know

lost laurel
#

yes?

smoky gyro
#

immm super lost i think im just gonna watch a video

#

thanks tho

lost laurel
#

sorry

opal cloak
smoky gyro
#

whats that?

opal cloak
#

its what they get taught in standard

smoky gyro
#

ohhh

lost laurel
#

so this is $(1.12)^{29}*1000+1000$

smoky gyro
opal cloak
unborn atlas
#

i havent done this stuff in years

woven radishBOT
#

ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know

lost laurel
#

I've never done this stuff

opal cloak
smoky gyro
#

yeah lucky u lol finance and stats areeeeee sooooo dumb

unborn atlas
#

its 1000 a year so its atleast 30000 💀

unborn atlas
#

i think this follow this

lost laurel
#

that's different though

#

here you're adding 1000 each year too

opal cloak
#

lets let A_n represent the amount of money in our account at the nth year

unborn atlas
#

idk how to account for the 1k a year

#

why not just add 1000

#

er

opal cloak
#

on our first year, A_1 we'd put in $1000 and that will gain interest

#

therefore A_1 = 1000(1.12)

unborn atlas
#

$$1000 * (1+0.12)^{# of years}$$

woven radishBOT
#

Nathan
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

unborn atlas
#

this gives it if the value isnt adding 1k

#

but i feel like it shouldnt be hard to manipulate

opal cloak
#

on our second year A_2 we add another 1000, and the money from last year and this year will gain interest

#

A_2 = 1000(1.12)(1.12)+1000(1.12)

smoky gyro
#

so 1.12 is from 12% interest rate?

opal cloak
#

yes

#

have u understood whats happening thus far?

smoky gyro
opal cloak
#

so on our first year we got 1000(1.12)

smoky gyro
#

yep

opal cloak
#

but that money is going to gain interest again

#

so it becomes 1000(1.12)(1.12)

smoky gyro
#

ohhh

#

okay i see

opal cloak
#

now if we look at the 3rd year, A_3, we get 1000(1.12)(1.12)(1.12)+1000(1.12)(1.12)+1000(1.12)

#

now we can simplify this

#

to 1000(1.12)^3 + 1000(1.12)^2 + 1000(1.12)^1

smoky gyro
#

yep

#

and we are looking at A_30 or somethin?

opal cloak
#

so after 30 years, A_30, we will get 1000(1.12)^30 + 1000(1.12)^29 + 1000(1.12)^28 + ... + 1000(1.12)^2 + 1000(1.12^1

opal cloak
smoky gyro
#

ohh

unborn atlas
opal cloak
#

now, if we write this in reverse its actually easier

smoky gyro
#

so r is 1000 here?

opal cloak
#

1000(1.12)^1 + 1000(1.12)^2 + ... + 1000(1.12)^28 + 1000(1.12)^29 + 1000(1.12)^30

opal cloak
smoky gyro
#

a is 1000(1.12)?

opal cloak
#

yes

#

and r is 1.12

smoky gyro
#

ohhhhhhh

#

okay

#

thanks that made so much more sense lol

opal cloak
#

all good

smoky gyro
#

what are u doing in ext 2 btw?

opal cloak
#

atm its mechanics

#

which is just a calculus version of physics

smoky gyro
#

o yeah

#

my mates are doing further integration rn

#

and their last assessment is just a presentation on the binomial distribution stuff

smoky gyro
opal cloak
#

i do English Advanced, Math ext 1, Math ext 2, Physics and Software Design and Development

#

hbu?

smoky gyro
#

im doing Eng ADV, Maths ADV, Physics, Legal, Ancient

unborn atlas
#

whats ext

opal cloak
#

extension

unborn atlas
#

is that some highschool program?

opal cloak
opal cloak
smoky gyro
#

haha yeah i was debating on whether doing ancient or modern but i decided to go with ancient cuz it seemed for interesting

unborn atlas
smoky gyro
#

but dammmmnnn ext 1 and 2, atar scaling gods be putting in work

opal cloak
#

problem is im lazy

smoky gyro
#

arent we all tbh

#

what are you up to in physics rn?

opal cloak
#

nature of light

#

its so boring

smoky gyro
#

are u in the middle of it?

unborn atlas
#

sounds super cool to me

opal cloak
#

and its all theory

smoky gyro
#

ya theres a fair bit

#

have u done photoelectric effect?

opal cloak
#

yep

smoky gyro
#

ive just finished special relativity which is at the end of mod 7

#

SR is cool

#

i think youll like it

opal cloak
#

hopefully

smoky gyro
#

trials next term tho lol

#

spoooky

opal cloak
#

yep

smoky gyro
#

what week is trials for you?

opal cloak
#

5 & 6 but english is at the end of 4

smoky gyro
#

ah nice

#

mine are week 3

opal cloak
#

oh rip

smoky gyro
#

when would the hsc be i know its like in 3 months and a bit

opal cloak
#

ah i forgot

#

i know its in october

smoky gyro
#

is that in term 3?

opal cloak
#

nah thats 4

smoky gyro
#

oh ok good

opal cloak
#

what course do u hope to get into?

smoky gyro
#

wait do u wanna take this to dms

opal cloak
#

sure

smoky gyro
#

aight

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @smoky gyro

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quaint pawn
devout snowBOT
quaint pawn
#

could anyone explain please

lost laurel
#

is this a test?

opal cloak
#

in a triangle, if u pick any 2 sides, their combined length must be larger than the 3rd

quaint pawn
#

so can u tell me why 2 wouldn't work

opal cloak
#

?

quaint pawn
#

the answer, 2, is not correct right

opal cloak
#

oh sorry, yeah that would be correct

lost laurel
#

and the difference of two sides must be less than the third

topaz axle
#

you add two smallest sides

#

2+7 > 9 is false

quaint pawn
#

appreciate it

#

adding the smaller sides helps

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @quaint pawn

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

granite arch
devout snowBOT
granite arch
#

is turned to

#

but i dont really get how this is done thx

opal cloak
#

looks like they squared everything

#

nah that woudlnt work

granite arch
#

i dont know if theyre really equivalent but it's the answer format

lost laurel
#

!original

devout snowBOT
#

Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.

lost laurel
#

please

granite arch
#

ok

#

@lost laurel

lost laurel
#

yeah, I'm reading it

#

thanks

granite arch
#

thx

arctic field
#

$\alpha$ is a root of $x^4 + 3x^3 + 2x + 6 = 0$

\medskip
implies

\medskip
$\alpha^{-2}$ is a root of $(x^{-1/2})^4 + 3(x^{-1/2})^3 + 2x^{-1/2} + 6 = 0$

#

hm

#

this is probably badly written

woven radishBOT
granite arch
#

ye

#

i got to here

arctic field
#

so you just do algebra

#

,, -2y^{3/2} = 1 + 3y + 6y^2

woven radishBOT
arctic field
#

square

#

,, 4y^3 = (1 + 3y + 6y^2)^2 = 36y^4 + 9y^2 + 1 + 6y + 36y^3 + 12y^2

woven radishBOT
granite arch
#

Oh so just square both sides?

arctic field
#

yes

granite arch
#

thanksss

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @granite arch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

nimble turret
#

in ap i have seen question where sum of first m and first n terms are same but they arent equal . can anyone explain how does it work

nimble turret
#

like in sn=sm but an=!am

#

since ap increases or decreases in constant values which are same
for example 2,5,8,11,14,17...........
lets say n =3
2+5+8=15
now how can there exist another term where the total value is 15 too?

topaz beacon
#

consider 2,1,0,-1

#

S1 = 2, S4 = 2

nimble turret
#

wait what

#

lemme think

#

ohh

#

so it can happen only when we go down?

#

wait nvm i got it

nimble turret
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @nimble turret

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

topaz beacon
#

it can happen when we go up

#

consider -2,-1,0,1

#

S1=-2, S4=-2

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

topaz beacon
#

it does have to cross 0 though

devout snowBOT
topaz beacon
#

oh great

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @topaz beacon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

nimble turret
#

lol

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dry iron
#

Can someone help me, how do I do these? i tried part a by adding 1/10 and 3/10 but its not right

umbral raft
#

What is the correct answer?

naive shuttle
#

Is it 3/10?

dry iron
dry iron
opal ferry
#

I’m slowly learning even in elementary

naive shuttle
#

So umm it’s cumulative

#

So a) asks for P(X<=3) but since its cumulative if we sub x= 3 in F(x) it already includes everything for x=1 to x=3

#

For b) u rewrite P(X>4) as 1-P(X<=4)

#

But there’s no x=4 since ,x is just 1,3,6,10

#

So we go down to the next smallest x that is available in F(x) which is X=3

#

So we get 1-P(X<=4) = 1-P(X<=3) = 1-0.3 = 0.7

#

c)

#

Umm same logic as a) F(x) already included all possibilities up to X=10

#

So it’s just 10/10 = 1

dry iron
devout snowBOT
#

@dry iron Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @dry iron

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

manic sigil
#

Hey, I was hoping someone could help me understand whether I should use confidence interval for a population mean, using a normal distribution or a Student's T distribution

manic sigil
#

I've got this table in excel. I calculated values for "Absorbance" (Y axis) based on "Protein concentration" (X axis)

#

Now, the green columns are the values 4 groups got from doing the experiment.

#

The red column is the average of each 4 values.

#

Each row is a different concentration, from 0 to 0.7

#

The blue column is the standard deviation that I found using excel's standard deviation function based on a sample

#

The confidence interval has an alpha of 0.05, so 95% confidence interval

#

My issue is that I don't know if I should be calculating the confidence interval using Normal distribution or using Student's T distribution (excel asks me for one of the two)

devout snowBOT
#

@manic sigil Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@manic sigil Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@manic sigil Has your question been resolved?

rich crow
manic sigil
#

I'll update my friends as well, since they picked one of them randomly and stuck with it lol

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @manic sigil

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quiet mason
#

How do I continue

devout snowBOT
quiet mason
#

Or restart

#

Probably restart tbh

echo lagoon
#

i'd say try trig sub before feynman

quiet mason
#

Ok ill try

#

No certain results

#

I put it into wolfram

#

Was absolutely wild

#

Ill try no trig sub

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @quiet mason

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

foggy walrus
#

hi all,

im having huge trouble with linear algebra 2. specifically, quaternions.
in our exam every year there is a seemingly simple problem involving an equation with quaternions. but, i always fail at this, and i don't know what i'm doing wrong.

here's an example problem with necessary information and where i get stuck (for example). i'm repeating this subject for the third time this year and figuring this out would be a huge help.

fierce remnant
#

So what's the question?

foggy walrus
#

what am i doing wrong?

#

im getting J2+J1 when the solution for z2 should be just j2

fierce remnant
#

What's z_2?

foggy walrus
#

in the equation, a variable we're supposed to find the solution to

#

we're given 3 sets (as seen above) and asked to find z1, z2, z3

fierce remnant
#

oh ok

#

are they simultaneous equations?

#

or are you just trying to solve 1), 2) and 3) separately?

foggy walrus
#

simultaneous

#

z1 in the first is the same as the 2nd and third

fierce remnant
#

You should write words in your working out

#

so you can keep track of the equations you're using

#

(and it'll be easier to mark)

foggy walrus
#

right

#

give me a second

fierce remnant
#

I can see you've rearranged (3)

#

as your first line of working

foggy walrus
fierce remnant
#

what are you doing in the 2nd line?

#

did you multiply the line above by J_1?

fierce remnant
#

it's painful to read

foggy walrus
#

i mean it does say that i multiply by j1 in the second line. yes

fierce remnant
#

so you're multiplying (3) by J_1?

foggy walrus
#

yes

#

so i can get j1z1 which appears in 1)

fierce remnant
#

why are you writing → (1) at the end of the line?

foggy walrus
#

because of the equation that's marked in blue and enumerated as 1)??

fierce remnant
#

that doesn't help at all

#

use words

#

literally write down the narration in your head as you work through the question

foggy walrus
#

this is common notation where i'm from. perhaps it's academic difference

fierce remnant
#

that's how you demonstrate to an examiner what you're doing

#

yea the academic difference is between doing it properly and leaving it up to the examiner to figure out your hieroglyphics

foggy walrus
#

i can show you the notes we used in class and our profs do it like this too lol

#

anyway, i'll do as you ask

fierce remnant
#

I'm following your work until the last line

#

I can only imagine the error is there

#

You aren't allowed to just make matrices commute

woven radishBOT
#

ekafeman

fierce remnant
#

@foggy walrus

foggy walrus
#

A^_1 B?

woven radishBOT
#

ekafeman

foggy walrus
#

because i'm multiplying from the left on the left side so i should do the same on the right?

fierce remnant
#

yea

#

and because

#

in general

#

'multiplying on the left' and 'multiplying on the right' are not the same operation

foggy walrus
#

that seems to give the right solution. trouble is prof's notes on this aren't terribly consistent

fierce remnant
#

BC isn't necessarily equal to CB for matrices

#

it's not the prof

fierce remnant
#

you messed it up there

foggy walrus
#

👍

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @foggy walrus

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

raven swift
devout snowBOT
kind tiger
#

have you done completing the square before

#

for solving quadratics

raven swift
kind tiger
#

ok this is how it works

#

if you have a quadratic x^2 + bx + c you complete the square by thinking about (x + b/2)^2 because this expands as x^2 + bx + b^2/4

#

do you see how that lines up with the x^2 + bx in the original quadratic

raven swift
kind tiger
#

i havent written any equations yet, what right hand side do you mean?

raven swift
kind tiger
#

we'r egonna add c

#

we have (x + b/2)^2 = x^2 + bx + b^2/4

#

so x^2 + bx = (x + b/2)^2 - b^2/4

#

and finally x^2 + bx + c = (x + b/2)^2 - b^2/4 + c

raven swift
#

we have two variables

kind tiger
#

yes but now im just going over how to complete the square

#

forget about the problem at hand for the moment

raven swift
#

oh alr

#

ok i think i get it

#

u subtract/add the c value

#

and divide b by 2

#

and square it

#

and add that on both sides?

#

and then u also have ur factor

kind tiger
#

yh

#

now we need to deal with a slightly hard case when we have ax^2 + bx + c

#

but we can just factor out the a to get a(x^2 + b/a x + c/a)
and then the bit inside the brackets is in the same form that we just did, so we can go on from there

kind tiger
raven swift
#

im not understanding it through the typing

kind tiger
#

$ax^2 + bx + c = a\left[x^2 + \frac{b}{a} x + \frac{c}{a} \right]$

woven radishBOT
kind tiger
#

does that help?

raven swift
#

type of form

kind tiger
#

wdym

#

i just factored out a

#

ill finish out the process and maybe thatll help

raven swift
#

is this conics?

kind tiger
#

no

#

this is just algebra, quadratic equations

raven swift
#

nvrm i got it

#

its 4

#

i see what u were saying

kind tiger
#

\begin{align*}
ax^2 + bx + c &= a\left[x^2 + \frac{b}{a} x + \frac{c}{a} \right] \
&= a\left[x^2 + 2 \frac{b}{2a} x + \left(\frac{b}{2a}\right)^2 - \left(\frac{b}{2a}\right)^2 + \frac{c}{a}\right] \
&= a\left[\left(x + \frac{b}{2a}\right)^2 - \left(\frac{b}{2a}\right)^2 + \frac{c}{a}\right] \
&= a\left[\left(x + \frac{b}{2a}\right)^2 - \frac{b^2}{4a^2} + \frac{c}{a}\right] \
&= a\left(x + \frac{b}{2a}\right)^2 - \frac{b^2}{4a} + c
\end{align*}

woven radishBOT
kind tiger
kind tiger
# woven radish **Acman**

though i would take some time to go over completing the square, particular this ^ so you understand how it works
both a useful tool common to come up in tests

raven swift
#

thank you tho

raven swift
#

we factor out aa 4

#

and then get it in two quad forms

#

and we find c value

kind tiger
#

yeah basically, nice

raven swift
#

alr take it easy

kind tiger
#

and you

raven swift
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @raven swift

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

chilly lodge
#

Can someone explain why this is not the inverse of f? It looks to be the inverse right? And what is the "preimage?"

devout snowBOT
#

@chilly lodge Has your question been resolved?

chilly lodge
#

<@&286206848099549185>

dawn iris
#

note that the inverse has to be a function, if you give it an input, it only gives you one output

#

so like if you take f(x) = x^2, this doesn't have an inverse because f^-1(1) can either be -1 or 1

#

the preimage is a more general idea; you just take the set of points that get mapped to the range

#

so the preimage of 1 under f is {-1,1}

#

its like a more general definition of an inverse

west pewter
#

We say that for a function $f:A \rightarrow B$, the preimage of $C \subseteq B$ is the set $f^{-1}(C) \coloneq {x \in A | f(x) \in C}$

woven radishBOT
west pewter
#

Do you need the function to be invertible to use this? Definitely not

chilly lodge
#

yes it is not needed

kind tiger
#

similarly a function $f : A \to B$ has \emph{image} $f\left(A\right) = \left{f\left(a\right) , | , a \in A\right}$

woven radishBOT
west pewter
#

Yep

chilly lodge
#

So the image is basically just the function

kind tiger
#

might help you see why its called a 'preimage' here

chilly lodge
#

so is the preimage like having the function being applied twice?

kind tiger
#

wdym

chilly lodge
#

if the image of $f(a)$ is $f\left(A\right) = \left{f\left(a\right) | a \in A\right}$

#

wait

#

so the image is the range of the function

kind tiger
#

yes

#

its a bit of an abuse of notation

chilly lodge
#

okay so I get the image

#

but what does that make the preimage?

kind tiger
#

you can also have the image of a subset $X \subset A$, $f\left(X) = \left{f\left(x\right) , | , x \in X\right}$

woven radishBOT
#

Acman
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

chilly lodge
#

so that's for a restricted domain

kind tiger
#

yes

#

then the preimage is the same concept in the other direction

chilly lodge
#

so going from range to domain?

kind tiger
#

yes

chilly lodge
#

so the range of the domain

#

is the preimage of $f(x)$?

woven radishBOT
#

Decoway

kind tiger
#

image is "given these points, what outputs can f give"
preimage is "given these outputs of f, what are the possible inputs"

chilly lodge
#

oh okay I get it now

#

thanks a lot!

kind tiger
#

nws !

chilly lodge
#

so for this image

#

z is the set of ranges given

#

and $f^{-1}({z})$ is the list of domains for those ranges?

woven radishBOT
#

Decoway

kind tiger
#

yes, though i wouldnt call these 'domains' and 'ranges'

#

a function $f : A \to B$ has \emph{domain} $A$, \emph{codomain} $B$, and \emph{image} $f\left(A\right)$

woven radishBOT
chilly lodge
#

👍

#

yes that makes sense

kind tiger
#

id try to avoid "range" entirely tbh

chilly lodge
#

so "domain" and "image?"

kind tiger
#

yes

chilly lodge
#

okay thanks!

kind tiger
#

then $f^{-1}\left(\left{z\right}\right)$ is a set of values \textit{from} the domain

woven radishBOT
chilly lodge
#

oh okay so if I'm understanding

#

z is the image of some restricted domain

#

and then $f^{-1}({z})$ will give that domain

woven radishBOT
#

Decoway

kind tiger
#

or {z} but yes

chilly lodge
#

okay thank you so much!

#

you explain well :)

kind tiger
#

thanks :D

chilly lodge
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @chilly lodge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

woven radishBOT
#

Decoway

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

zinc pewter
#

For the love of god, please help me

devout snowBOT
zinc pewter
#

Here is my work:

#

I have been stuck on this for an hour

#

Ok, according to some guy on Chegg, my y is correct.

#

LMFAO I never integrated with respect to x

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @zinc pewter

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

unkempt dawn
devout snowBOT
unkempt dawn
#

Answer for A) is i according to the answer key

#

But why is it not also possibly iii)?

#

What am I missing

#

Both are negative leading coefficients, both are cubic

scarlet sequoia
#

you can simply say that for i) we have x = 0 as a root

#

and for iii) we don't

#

since i) passes through the origin it fits

unkempt dawn
#

One moment

#

Where do you get x as a zero

#

For i

scarlet sequoia
#

plug x = 0 and check

unkempt dawn
#

K hold up

scarlet sequoia
#

if every single term has x in it then it's obvious that x = 0 is a root

unkempt dawn
#

Right because anything time 0 is 0

scarlet sequoia
#

yep

#

exactly

unkempt dawn
#

Ok I get that's how you find the y intercept

#

Oh is it because 0+3 is 3?

scarlet sequoia
#

there are plenty of ways, in general, to show that i) fits in this case and iii) not, not only the y-intercept, but this one is pretty simple and fast

scarlet sequoia
unkempt dawn
#

Oh I see because if thst were true then y would equal +3 which it doesn't

#

How do I determine where the line begins I'm reference to quadrants

#

Specifically with cubic polynomial functions?

scarlet sequoia
#

well, it such a picture (with limited ranges of the axes) it depends, but generally it's enough to look at a leading coefficient

scarlet sequoia
#

and if its positive then it starts from the left (III quadrant)

devout snowBOT
#

@unkempt dawn Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @unkempt dawn

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

grave stratus
devout snowBOT
grave stratus
#

i have no idea what the answer is fuck

#

there's no example for show me how to work it out either

#

can someone translate what they want from me

#

and give me a step by step on how to answer

scarlet sequoia
#

I suppose they're talking about the definition

grave stratus
#

okay

#

which means

scarlet sequoia
#

which means f(x) = b^x

grave stratus
#

okay

#

whichhh meanssss?

#

i just don't know what part is the exponential function

#

obviously it's b, 0 or 1, right?

#

or maybe x?

#

but x is the variable not the exponent

scarlet sequoia
#

variable in the exponent -> exponential function

grave stratus
#

oh i'm right

#

okay

#

let's try it

#

the options are is/is not

scarlet sequoia
#

is x^4 of the form b^x?

grave stratus
#

i don't think the first one is an exp function but i think the 2nd one is

#

wait

#

or maybe reverse

#

can u explain why the first one isn't

scarlet sequoia
#

because it doesn't have x in the exponent

grave stratus
#

that's what i thought sweet

#

okay so now the options are increasing decreasing constant zero

#

i'm reading the ebook to see what it says and if there's an easy way to figure it out

scarlet sequoia
#

yeah it is

#

increasing for b > 1 and decreasing for 0 < b < 1

#

you can use this picture to determine it

grave stratus
#

that's helpful

#

this one is increasing too, right?

scarlet sequoia
#

,calc 2/7

woven radishBOT
#

Result:

0.28571428571429
scarlet sequoia
#

< 1

#

---> ...

grave stratus
#

ohhhhhhhh

#

so it's decfreasing

#

i just did a bunch of interval notions but this one doesn't have any numbers

#

how do i tell which part is which

#

oh wait

#

is f(x) the domain and b^x the range?

#

or does it actually want numbers

scarlet sequoia
#

possible set of numbers

#

domain is possible set of numbers of x and range for y

grave stratus
#

it wants numbers so how do u do that

#

the ebook has this which looks like fx=b^x so i just have to find the domain and range by looking at this

#

sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

#

so the domain would be [-5, 5] ???????

#

or (-infin, infin)?

#

bc it looks like it goes on in both directions

#

and the range would also be (infin, infin)

#

oh u hate me now @scarlet sequoia

#

okay so i did the infin bc it's obvi this bitch is infin asf

#

<@&286206848099549185> what is an asymptote

#

i see this but

#

how do i write the equivalent

modern rivet
#

Should be y=0?

#

Not too sure

grave stratus
#

i want you to be sure

#

i need you to be sure

#

i can't retake this

copper sonnet
#

y = 0 is correct

grave stratus
#

❤️

#

fucking bet

modern rivet
grave stratus
#

apparently i can retake it yay

modern rivet
#

Tf this is a different question-

grave stratus
#

yes

#

it is a different question

#

good eye

#

i clicked submit and 2 of my answers were wrong

modern rivet
#

I’m blind 😞

grave stratus
#

dw me too

modern rivet
#

Yay!

grave stratus
#

OHHH

#

Fx=bx^ whatever is the answer

#

it wanted the whole thing

modern rivet
#

An asymptote btw is a “line” that your curve in a graph approaches

#

Well tries to

modern rivet
grave stratus
#

okay this actually makes sense i think

#

h(2), i would simply take 1/4 and power it to 2 to get ....... 1/16?

#

h(-1) would just be 4 because you'd flip the fraction and change the changes ig?

#

then h(-2) would be 16 for the same reasons?

#

oh my GOD I WAS RIGHT

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @grave stratus

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cunning roost
devout snowBOT
cunning roost
#

why does the graph look like that?

#

doesnt that mean theres a hole at x =2?

devout snowBOT
#

@cunning roost Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @cunning roost

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quiet mason
#

I tried this integral a few hours ago and I really cant get enough of it, does anyone see a different approach in this?

quiet mason
#

I did try trig sub before Feynman, didnt work aswell

timber pebble
#

hows weierstrauss work

quiet mason
#

Sorry I dont... fully understand

timber pebble
#

not well bearlain

#

well maybe you can do it indefinite but i have doubts now

quiet mason
#

Indefinitive is very casual

#

Just integrate cosx

#

But its the infinity not giving a certain result

stable storm
#

i think ibp after feynman would work just fine

#

choosing $u=\sin(\alpha x), dv=\frac{x}{x^2+1}$

#

you can connect the integral part you get back to I(alpha)

quiet mason
#

Ooo

woven radishBOT
stable storm
#

not cosine mb should be sine

quiet mason
#

Ill give it a try

#

Dont mind the trig sub

stable storm
#

that integral doesn’t seem possible either

#

hmm

quiet mason
#

Not even only the integral, I dont think this converges at all lol

stable storm
#

yeah

quiet mason
#

I did use wolfram a few hours ago

#

I wont spoil it but the asnwer was... interesting

#

I didnt see the method ofc

dense lynx
#

this integral is one that can be approached using contour integration

quiet mason
#

Do i close or

dense lynx
#

though i assume there’s multiple ways to do it

quiet mason
#

Oh like the integral sign with the circle in it?

stable storm
#

yeah

quiet mason
#

Welp rip

#

Thanks for trying to help

stable storm
#

you would have to deal with a pole but

#

you can just use residue theorem

#

i’m sure feynman is possible

#

it’s just it might be more complicated

quiet mason
dense lynx
#

what power series?

quiet mason
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @quiet mason

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

near cedar
#

can someone help me find the distance between H and point M

near cedar
#

Two electric poles of the same height h are erected on both sides of the sidewalk facing a wide avenue 80m. From a point M on the road surface between two electric poles, one can see the tops of two electric poles with elevation angles of 60degree and 30degree respectively. Calculate the height of the poles. (rounded to the second decimal place)

#

question btw

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

someone pls save me... <@&286206848099549185>

void snow
outer merlin
#

!status

devout snowBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
void snow
near cedar
#

or below

void snow
#

ok so you do know what is $\tan{()}$

woven radishBOT
#

Adversing

near cedar
#

yea i know

ocean seal
#

There are 3 triangle there

#

You can use the angles from the other 2 triangles to help fill out the third.

outer merlin
#

Why would you name them differently? they are the same height

ocean seal
#

My mistake

#

Ignore that

outer merlin
#

Two equations using tan and its solved

void snow
# near cedar yea i know

ok, so, for this problem you have to define first the data the problem gave you

I'd define the poles height as $h$, the distance from point $M$ to the pole with an elevation (with an angle of 60°) as $d$ and the distance from the same point ($M$) to the pole with an elevation (with an angle of 30°) as $80-d$

You can use the tangent of these angles to obtain what you're looking for

$$
\tan{(60°)} = \sqrt{3} = \frac{h}{d} \to h = d\sqrt{3}
$$

then you do the same for the other pole (elevation of 30°)

$$
\tan{(30°)} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} = \frac{h}{80-d} \to h = \frac{80-d}{\sqrt{3}}
$$

since you obtain $h$ in both equations you can do an equality like this:

$$ d\sqrt{3} = \frac{80-d}{\sqrt{3}} $$

and then you solve for $d$ and you obtain the result

woven radishBOT
#

Adversing

void snow
#

(to obtain the result you have to use again $h = d\sqrt{3}$)

woven radishBOT
#

Adversing

void snow
woven radishBOT
#

Adversing

ocean seal
#

Wouldn’t it be easier at a pre university level to just fill out sine law twice and get an exact value?

void snow
#

the guy said that he knew how to use the tan function, hence there's no sense in doing what you're trying to suggest

#

if he didn't know about the tan function I would've done it with the sine law

void snow
near cedar
#

im trying to comprehend that english is not my first language

ocean seal
#

Ok

void snow
devout snowBOT
#

@near cedar Has your question been resolved?

near cedar
void snow
near cedar
#

oh ok

void snow
#

$\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{3}$

woven radishBOT
#

Adversing

devout snowBOT
#

@near cedar Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dry iron
#

Can someone help me with this, I’m not sure how to continue it to solve for the unknown variables because I tried but it’s not going well

opal cloak
#

yo

#

remember that the sum of p(x) must be equal to 1

devout snowBOT
#

@dry iron Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fickle warren
#

I don't understand it conceptually

devout snowBOT
fickle warren
#

idk

#

Wait

#

LHS of U

#

Since there is one row equal to 0, that means we can write one of the vectors in terms of the other, which means all three vectors are not linearly independant.

#

idk

#

For the second part, we have to analyse RHS of U I believe

devout snowBOT
#

@fickle warren Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@fickle warren Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@fickle warren Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@fickle warren Has your question been resolved?

hybrid snow
#

I have a question

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

oblique silo
#

find closed form of:

devout snowBOT
oblique silo
elfin hill
#

!status

devout snowBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
oblique silo
#

1

#

i mean i know i should use newtons binomial

elfin hill
#

Does this formula looks like anything you know?

#

Yes, write the formula for newton's binomial

oblique silo
#

yeah but what now

elfin hill
#

Derivate it with respect to r

oblique silo
elfin hill
#

no, derivate newton's binomial

oblique silo
#

sum kr^(k-1) (n choose k) ?

elfin hill
#

yes

#

derivate it once more

oblique silo
#

oh

#

right

#

git it

#

but what if instead of k(k-1) it was a polinomial that you cant get from deriving?

wise storm
#

you can multiply by r before differentiating the second time

elfin hill
#

well in that case i think you can work things out using the formula for k times n choose k

oblique silo
#

what formula?

elfin hill
#

k times n choose k = n times n-1 choose k-1

oblique silo
#

how can i use that

#

let's say it was

#

(k^3 - 2k^2 + k + 1)(r^k)

elfin hill
#

Well you use it twice and get (n-1)(n-2) sum r^k times n-2 choose k-2

elfin hill
#

k^3 r^k = r times derivative(r times derivative ((r times derivative(r^k)))

#

So it's a bit long but it gets you something in the end

devout snowBOT
#

@oblique silo Has your question been resolved?

oblique silo
wise storm
#

the main trick cjg is showing you is that you can get any power of k

#

once you have that, you can just multiply by constants and add these types of series together to make anything

#

idk if this will make it more confusing or not but if you have a polynomial $p(x)$ then

$$p\left(r \dv{r}\right) (1+r)^n = \sum_{k=0}^n p(k) r^k \binom{n}{k}$$

woven radishBOT
wise storm
#

the weird part is the polynomial p( r d/dr) on the left

wise storm
oblique silo
#

i dont really understand how i can get to any polinomial

wise storm
#

ok let's do it in steps, does this make sense:$$r \dv{r}(1+r)^n = \sum_{k=0}^n k r^k \binom{n}{k}$$

woven radishBOT
oblique silo
#

not really

#

the derivative of r times the binomial?

#

why?

wise storm
#

the derivative turns r^k into k*r^{k-1} inside the sum

#

then cause r^k became r^{k-1} we multiply by r to make it back into r^k again

oblique silo
#

what does this part mean

wise storm
#

take the derivative wrt r, and then multiply by r

#

let me back up one step

#

$$\dv{r}(1+r)^n = \sum_{k=0}^n k r^{k-1} \binom{n}{k}$$

woven radishBOT
wise storm
#

this makes sense?

oblique silo
#

is wrt a typo or an acronym? lol

wise storm
#

wrt means "with respect to" haha

oblique silo
#

ohh

oblique silo
#

lol

wise storm
#

yeah good question

#

ok cool then next level up is just to repeat that process

#

take the derivative again and then multiply by r

#

and you get k^2 inside

#

$$r \dv{r}\left(r \dv{r}(1+r)^n \right)= \sum_{k=0}^n k^2 r^k \binom{n}{k}$$

oblique silo
#

sure yeah

woven radishBOT
wise storm
#

although we could just agree to write that as
$$\left(r \dv{r}\right)^2 (1+r)^n = \sum_{k=0}^n k^2 r^k \binom{n}{k}$$

woven radishBOT
oblique silo
#

suqaring d/dr means do the derivative twice?

#

oh yeah

#

makes sense

#

yeah

wise storm
#

yeah, we gotta be careful about the order though

oblique silo
#

yeah

wise storm
#

yup

#

do you see how it gets up to this bit, or is this still a little murky:

$$p\left(r \dv{r}\right) (1+r)^n = \sum_{k=0}^n p(k) r^k \binom{n}{k}$$

woven radishBOT
oblique silo
#

but wait

oblique silo
wise storm
oblique silo
#

i thought you meant the order of d/dr

wise storm
#

it doesn't mean take the second derivative wrt r and then multiply by r^2

oblique silo
#

huh what then

wise storm
#

it means take the derivative, then multiply by r - and then do this again

#

for comparison compute both of these:
$$r \dv{r}\left(r \dv{r}r^k\right)$$
$$r^2 \dv[2]{r}r^k$$

woven radishBOT
wise storm
#

the first one is what ( r d/dr)^2 means, the second is what you are doing

oblique silo
#

ohhh

#

rightt

#

got it

#

thanks

wise storm
#

yup you're welcome

oblique silo
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @oblique silo

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

marsh coral
#

Consider the parabola y = 3x^2 + 6x - 17:
a) Write the equation for the axis of symmetry
b) Find the coordinates of the vertex of the graph of the parabola
c) Identify the vertex as a maximum or minimum
d) Graph the parabola

I am not very good at parabolas so I am kinda lost. But I did try using a perfect square.

surreal night
#

what did you get trying to write it as completing the square?

marsh coral
#

I don’t think it was right because it wasn’t even making sense when I did it so I erased it

#

It was 100% incorrect so I scrapped it

#

So I’m starting from square one

surreal night
#

alright

#

how can you complete the square here

marsh coral
#

Um

surreal night
#

(you want something like (x+a)^2)

marsh coral
#

I tried to get at that

surreal night
#

do you know how to complete the square?

marsh coral
#

I have an idea

#

Yeah scratch

#

That

#

Ik what it is but idk how to do it

#

I watched a video but I was still lost

surreal night
#

okay, if we expand (x+a)^2 we get x^2+2ax+a^2

#

we only care about the x terms, so x^2+2ax