#help-27
1 messages · Page 198 of 1
When differentiating
Wait you mean
Yes
Yes
OHHHHHHH
I appreciate it thank you
My brain farted on that one
Are you okay b?😭
i am thanks for asking😄👍
Alright bet
I’m gonna close now
Closed by @hasty crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Factor the left hand side
SWR
@lament schooner Has your question been resolved?
im duymb asf
preschool math is too hard
ty
.close
Closed by @lament schooner
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know how to solve this but I am not sure about my answer
Well what's your answer?
199.5 , 340.5
degrees
Also
Is there a faster way of doing this other than guessing it
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Can you use a calculator?
Does your calculator have a sin button?
and try to get closer and closer
yea it's Casio 991ex
Does your calculator have a shift button?
yes
shift then sin then type the value you have (-1/3)
This is called the inverse sin function
It'll only give you one solution
you have to figure out the other one on your own
though it's not difficult if you know how to get to it
I just guess a number
that equals -0.33
No guessing involved
is there a way?
Yes
show pls
So that's your first answer then
Sketch
There are technically infinitely many answers here, but let's focus on the ones in the first period
Since your answer is negative add 360° to it
yea
To put it into the first period
Don't mind my artistic skills
So you now have the blue angle
That's the first solution
how to get the green one?
no don't worry g
is it on the same angle from the x line
or the y line
like angle of Blue = angle of green line?
No it's not
ohh
Blue angle is clearly larger
yeah you mean if we start from postive side x
ok got it
these 2 points lie on a circle and they both touch the line y=-1/3 right?
ye
if we use a protractor we can find the angle
is there a mathmatical way to find the angle?
Well you have to calculate it
Yes
One thing to note here is that these 2 angles are the same
Oh is that what you meant before? Sorry if I missunderstood you
yea that
but I understood the idea
it's like circle theorem
like in nature
Anyway, the green angle would be 180° + yellow right?
yes
and the blue angle is 360° - yellow right?
so since you know the blue angle, you can calculate yellow
yes for sure
and from yellow get the green angle
ohhhhhh
that's genius
no more guessing
yeah my answers were correct before
but now I can prove them
@safe fractal thanks g
ye, what you did before was a numeric method
congrats
you invented computer maths
I found this harder than differentiation
that image you drew is what clicked for me in the end
@safe fractal
.close
Closed by @viscid goblet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can u get some help plz with a markov chain question
im rly stuck
show
have u done markov chains before?
kinda
lmk if u understand it then ill ask u my dilemma
@wooden cairn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do u do part a
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
Also can use: AM≥GM
And for the two variable case, the AM-GM inequality can be proved using this fact
$(2a+b)^2 >= 0$
Z3ITRA
@pale orbit Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pale orbit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What percentage of the distribution falls above D7?
a. 7%
b. 30%
c. 70%
d. 90%
@obsidian drum Has your question been resolved?
@obsidian drum Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey everyone, on the internet I didnt find any clear answer. What is $log^2 n$ normally ? Is it $log(n) \cdot log(n)$ or rather log(log(n))?
barış
"usually" (i.e. from my experience) it's used to refer to (log(n))^2, though of course there may be some places where it's the latter that's meant
Alright. Thank you very much!
.close
Closed by @ionic swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help pls
what have you tried
@stone thorn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with something simple
300 x 0.25
im not getting the correct numbers
I understand 300 times 0.25 = 75 but i need help manually doing it correctly
@waxen grotto Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @waxen grotto
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\vec{\nabla} \dot \vec{\nabla}\cross f = 0$
Mephisto
no idea how to fix this... it's basically div(rot(f)) = 0
can this identity by interpreted as
the rotation around a point, cannot change instantaintiously, bu changes gradually instead?
@shell heron Has your question been resolved?
$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \cross f = 0$
Katharine
thanks
although i don't think this is correct
as i don't know what the curl of a function is
i mean a function $\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$
Katharine
Katharine
or maybe $\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \cross \vec{A} = 0$?
Katharine
@hot steeple my bad
It should be that the rotor of the gradient is always 0
no woops
wrong again
divergence of the curl of a vector field is 0
that's the identity
so this
@shell heron Has your question been resolved?
@shell heron Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @shell heron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A cyclic quadrilateral has length 25, 39, 52, 60 in order, what is the circumdiameter?
So I tried to use ptolemy's and got AC*BD = 3640 but don't think there is a next step
I found the area with Brahmagupta's and got 36*49 = 1764
I tried to then use the center to form 4 isoceles triangles but I don't think that works because the angles are unknown
Not sure what to try next
I know it but I don't want to bash it and we didn't learn it in class so I can't use it
only things I can use are Ptolemy, Brahmagupta, and the quadrilateral with the largest area with a certain sequence of side lengths is always cyclic
I'm afraid the formula of the radius from the data you have is the above so I can't see a simpler way. It could only be a simpler way if there were some symetries in your special case, but I didn't check
You could also perform the proofs of the formula yourself, it takes time though
I mean the side lengths look kinda purposeful
Yes maybe, I don't have a piece of paper atm sadly
it's alright, thank you
it's good you noticed
consider the significance of those numbers and you will probably see your way forward
@frosty gyro Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with some Desmos restrictions.
The equation for the circle right now is: $(x-2.56)^2 + (y-2.96)^2 = 0.7^2 { x \ge 1.934$ } { y \ge 2.384 } $.
Without the restrictions it is: $(x-2.56)^2 + (y-2.96)^2 = 0.7^2$
HelloLife
I need help with some Desmos restrictions.
The equation for the circle right now is: $(x-2.56)^2 + (y-2.96)^2 = 0.7^2 { x \ge 1.934$ } { y \ge 2.384 } $.
Without the restrictions it is: $(x-2.56)^2 + (y-2.96)^2 = 0.7^2$
```Compilation error:```! Missing } inserted.
<inserted text>
}
l.50 ....56)^2 + (y-2.96)^2 = 0.7^2 { x \ge 1.934$
} { y \ge 2.384 } $.
I've inserted something that you may have forgotten.
(See the <inserted text> above.)
With luck, this will get me unwedged. But if you
really didn't forget anything, try typing `2' now; then
my insertion and my current dilemma will both disappear.```
so what is the problem?
i want the circle to be cut above the line but i cant get all of it
also laTeX does not like { }
what is the equation of the other curve?
$(x+0.1)^2+(y+0.1)^2=3.94^2$
HelloLife
i also have this as a restriction: y >= 0.37
thank you
np
.close
Closed by @full wind
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The equation for the tangent plane to the graph of the function
$\f(x, y) = 3 + \frac{x^2}{16} + \frac{y^2}{9}\$
is given as $3x - 4y + 6z = 6$ at the point $(a,b,c)$ where $c = f(a,b)$.$\$
- find the point $(a,b,c)\$
- calculate the linearization of $f$ at $(-4,3)$.$\$
milanesa de pollo
If the point is on the graph of the function and on the plane at the same time it must satisfy both equations at the same time
yes
,w D[3 + (x^2)/16 + (y^2)/9 , y]
help
I need to clear z
$3x -4y +6z = 6 \
6z = 6 -3x +4y \
z = 1 -\frac{x}{2} + \frac{2y}{3}$
milanesa de pollo
,w solve x/8 = -1/2
,w solve 2y/9 = 2/3
if $c = f(-4,3)$
milanesa de pollo
if $c = f(-4,3)$ then $\\implies f(-4,3) = \left(3 + \frac{(-4)^2}{16} + \frac{3^2}{9} \right) = \left(3 + 1 + 1\right) = 5$
its something like this for the linearization
,, L(-4,3) = f(-4,3) + f_x(-4,3)(x - (-4)) + f_y(-4,3)(y - 3)
hopefully I am not just yapping
,, L(-4,3) = f(-4,3) + f_x(-4,3)(x - (-4)) + f_y(-4,3)(y - 3) \
f(-4,3) = 5 \
f_x(-4,3) = \frac{-4}{8} \
f_y(-4,3) = \frac{2 \cdot 3}{9} \
L(-4,3) = 5 + \left( \frac{-4}{8}\right)(x - (-4)) +\left( \frac{2 \cdot 3}{9}\right)(y - 3) \
L(-4,3) = 5 + \left( \frac{-1}{2}\right)(x +4) +\left( \frac{2}{3}\right)(y - 3) \
milanesa de pollo
,w simplify 5 + (-1/2)(x+4) + (2/3)(y-3)
@bitter halo Has your question been resolved?
@bitter halo Has your question been resolved?
@bitter halo Has your question been resolved?
@bitter halo Has your question been resolved?
whats your question
your work for linearization looks alright to me
find the point a b c
okay well you have a system of equations
try to find expressions for x, y, and z given the constraints
youll quickly see only one set of values makes sense
how to do that
how to do that can you show me
consider only the eqn for f(x,y)
set that equal to z
and try to obtain an eqn for x and y
@bitter halo
can you draw it
hold on
$z = 3 + \frac{x^2}{16} + \frac{y^2}{9}$
$z - 3 - \frac{y^2}{9} = \frac{x^2}{16}$
etc etc
esca | এস্কা
actually i think its easier if you solve for y first
but do you have a better idea of the process now
okay lemme give you a hint
first rearrange the eqn of the plane
so that you get z = ...
then, plug in z for the equation z = f(x,y)
.
if you expand and do some simple algebra, you can complete the square
yep you got there
now eliminate z by substitution
and youll get a problem that involves completing the square
now normally when you have 3 unknowns but only two equations, it has infinte solutions
however, in this case it just so works out that there is only one real solution that makes sense
that was a pretty big hint
can you draw it
wdym draw it
i dont think theres any good visual intuition here other than literally "a plane tangent to a bowl looking thing"
by completing the square all i mean is youll get some equation involving $(x+a)^2$ and $(y+b)^2$ where a and b are just numbers. you can figure it out with some work
esca | এস্কা
how to do that
@bitter halo Has your question been resolved?
@bitter halo Has your question been resolved?
@bitter halo Has your question been resolved?
rewrite the plane formula as z=g(x,y). Then solve g(x,y)=f(x,y) for x and y, then plug them into the plane formula to get (a,b,c)
I rewrote the plane as a function of x and y
ahh you mean like this
first equation
this
,w solve 3 + (x^2)/16 + (y^2)/9 = 1 - x/2 + (2y)/3
ah I messed up something but dunno where
,w solve 3 + (x^2)/16 + (y^2)/9 = 1 - (-4)/2 + (2*3)/3
.close
Closed by @bitter halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given that a=x+(1/x) solve for x in terms of a
Multiply X on both sides
i got ax-1=x
You'll get quadratic equation
ax-1=x^2
Ok
There is
ax-1=x^2
Means x^2-ax+1=0
Just substitute the coefficients
Closed by @hard cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
can send rules of intregation
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain the final part of this question. I’m new to definite integration so I’m not really getting the same answer as solution when I apply f(b)-f(a)
@golden hollow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me to understand this problem ?
Let a be the total white area and b the total black area
And assume that the total area, a+b, is 1
Then 1 is divided in 9 parts
4 are white, 4 are black and 1 has the same proportion as the whole figure, as the pattern is infinite
it's a sum of infinite GP
So the total white area equals 4/9 (because of the white squares) plus the total white area fivided by 9, a/9, because of the square at the centre
So a = 4/9 + a/9
4 white and 4 black, so when we calculating the total white area, isn't it be just 4/8 ? how is it 4/9 ?
The total white area is the four big squares, plus the four smaller squares, plus another four until infinity
are we considering that middle square also ?
Yes
the total shaded area is 4/9 +1/9(4/9 + 1/9(4/9 + ......))
Now that I understand it, we are going to calculate the shaded area as 4/9 for the first cube. Now for the inside cube, it becomes 4/9^2, and if we even go further, we get 4/9^3 +.....
But I have a doubt: once we are done with the first outer cube and go inside to calculate the shaded area, are we ignoring the shaded squars of the outer cube and only considering the inner cube shaded region? because the sequence is like 4/9 + 4/9^2 + 4/9^3 + ...
isin't it be like 4/9 + 8/9^2 + 12/9^3 + ...
In this case, you are considering on each term only four squares
And at each step the squares are 9 times smaller than the previous time
So it must be 4/9 + 4/9^2 +...
If we consider each square at a time, does getting smaller effect the shaded region because its just another square that like we calculate the shaded region of the the first one 4/9?
okay i got it now. its square of equal area
.close
Closed by @sacred wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain me this problem? i don't understand what it trying me to calculate.
the airport had <that many> departures throughout the entirety of 2001
what's the mean number of seconds between one departure and the next one?
so should i just add 738+114, to get the total departure and then find out the mean number of second between each departure ?
i think it's a typo
they meant that comma as a decimal separator
they had 738114 departures
although that's quite a lot lol
Closed by @sacred wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So ive got a pythageors theoreom question and ill just show you
I need to find a side length but honestly I'm just stuck
I'm going for dinner now ill come back to this in 20 mins
The little lines means they're congruent sides. There's two ways to go about this. Either use the 45-45-90 theorem or let both sides be x
Ah alright thanks
@cedar echo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi could someone please help me with this😭 the markscheme requires it to be solved with R=cos(x-a)
@limber wren Has your question been resolved?
No 😭
<@&286206848099549185>
I assume you meant $R\cos(x-\alpha)$
Civil Service Pigeon
note the maximum of cos x is 1, so the maximum her eis just R
and to find where the maximum occurs, recall that $\cos x$ is maximized at $x=2\pi n$, where $n$ is an integer
Civil Service Pigeon
then just do your standard transformations fare
@limber wren Has your question been resolved?
@limber wren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! I'm in AP Precalculus and I'm currently doing homework for Polar Function graphs, and I'm very stuck on how to deal with finding radius for a polar function. If I could get the example and help on how to find it, I'd be very grateful.
I understand to replace the theta (ex. 8cos(4 • pi/6)), but I've forgotten what to do after that.
(Ignore the 8, j don't know if it's correct.)
what exactly is your problem
I don't know how to exactly go past this point.
what does the question say
@misty root Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to solve for x? (geometry)
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Do you know the Pythagorean theorem?
Closed by @solar geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
heres my attempt
(its wrong obiously)
the answer is 1/64
but i got 1/16
can someone explain why?
looks correct to me
oh so the solution (1/64) is wrong
yeah that's for strictly more than two
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone please help me with this
ok thanks
let acceleration be A
you know that Vi = V
and it travels length C+L
V initial
oh and you need time
thats how long it takes the truck to travel L metres
use eqution t = d/v
distance over velocity
the substitue that into
$\Delta d = v_i t + 0.5at^2$
and isolate a
and thats your answer
Derivative
is there a way to do it without that equation
maybe there is but thats the only way i know
alr
is this physics or math?
maths
yeah this section uses chain rule alot
Derivative
and i told you time is $\dfrac{L}{V}$
Derivative
for the car it will travel $C+L = V dt$
Derivative
also you know $dt = \dfrac{dV}{a}$
Derivative
right
but $t = \dfrac{L}{V}$
Derivative
i must have made a mistake elsewhere
o
Derivative
Derivative
$a = \dfrac{V dV}{C+L}$
Derivative
well
whats V dV
hmm
i think this is good bsides the dV
because we have all the elements
i need to get rid of dV
thats the only thing
not sure
@hexed ocean Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone help me
Which option
All except b if possible please
You can find f(-6) from graph
Hey?
@restive river
hey
.
sorry i didnt think u would respond that quick
not necessarily
are you saying f(-6) = 2
Yes
that is false
bruh
the graph provided is the graph of f', not f
did u even bother reading it
we can write the eqn of that straight line which passes through (-6,2) and (-2,0)
thats your f'x for that interval
integrate with proper bounds/conditions to get f(x)
to solve part a, you wish to make use of the second fundamental theorem of calculus
that is,
without an a and b or a f(x) it'll be difficult
yep that's why the problem gives you f(-2) = 7
How would that help?
since you can replace one of a and b with -2, and replace one of a and b with -6
(you're given f(-2) and you want to find f(-6))
see what happens when you do this and see if you can make progress on the problem then
But it wouldn't necessarily give f(-6)
It would give the area between those two bounds
hm
so you plugged in the numbers correctly
though that integrand should be f'(x) not f(-6)
by this equation, on the LHS you are integrating f'(x) from -6 to -2
you replaced the f'(x) with something else but you can't do that since there's no a or b there
So what would I do
you integrate f'(x) from -6 to -2
Closed by @tough valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, can someone explain me this
what is the context
I need to find the height of the wall
Then?
im in sixth grade
i dont know much
im having trouble with the circumfrance of a circle
i dont understand how to
feel free to open a help channel
how
this question was for both of u lol
I dont
the green line is also 40
is the ground flat💀
So it have 3 degrees?
uhh can you rephrase that
If I pick the 15° one, what I have to do?
do you know which ratio to use
No,sorry this is a new topic for me
ok that's fine (that said i actually do have to go right now😅if nobody else comes to help maybe ping @ helpers)
.close
Closed by @fair bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
what is cos(2θ) in terms of sin
do not know what you mean
you know the double angle identities for cos?
another one?
another one?
1-sin^2 x
yes
ok
and what is tan
2/sqrt5?
why is that needed
okay
then just do basic arithmetic
close
@atomic saffron Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @atomic saffron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You have made no attempt
(do you have any idea of how to begin?)
@wispy cradle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
only own non-verified existence fronts the verified.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@dusty falcon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why are these functions defined with domain X which is a subset of R instead of simply R itself
but then what guarantees X is a subset of real numbers too
does the definition of addition only holds true for functions with a real domain?
its just the definition of a funtion
no it holds for complex functions too
its just the general representation
well why would we imply unnecessary restrictions
every set of real numbers that you can think of, will be a subset of real numbers
to ensure generality, we say that the domain of a real func. is a subset of R
if we went around making a theorem and say domain is the set of all real numbers, then that definition would break for functions who's domain is not all real numbers, say x^1/2n
and since it wouldn't hold for all types of functions, it's not much of a theorem is it?
so it isnt unnecessary restriction, 'cuz every function have all reals as a domain is not necessarily true
I'm not saying that they should have the set of all real numbers as a domain but if the definition of addition is true for functions with domains which contain non-real numbers then why specify the domain to be just a subset of real numbers. Can we do something like X is a subset of R union (the set of complex numbers)?
oh well they only tend to teach parts of real analysis in high school
you'll find all that in complex analysis
Closed by @high ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me on c
@tawdry venture Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, this may seem like a silly question but I'm trying to find the surface area of this 2d donut, the outer circle that's highlighted green. I have the diameter of both the inner circle and outer circle, but I'm not sure how to find the entire surface area of the outer circle in millimetres. Together they make 53mm if that helps
Can I please get some help
You know the big one and you know the small one
Yeah I do, I just don't know how to get the total surface area in mm of the shaded green part
Oh wait would the entire surface area just be 13mm
Area of larger circle minus the area of the smaller circle.
So 53-40 which would be 13mm?
pi*R^2 - pi*r^2
I'm confused, what would be the radius, would it be say pi53^2 - pi40^2?
Yes.
The answer is 3789, but what that be in terms of mm? I'm really confused 😭
When unsure about the units, just place the units inside of the variables and see what you get when evaluated.
I'm even more confused 😭 so pi * (53)^2 = area mm ^ 2? And that's for one?
Yes. The units will be mm^2.
All you are doing is calculating the area of the entire larger circle which is given by pi * (53)^2 and subtracting the area of the smaller circle pi * (40)^2. The remaining area will be the area of the green donut
so the answer is still 3789, so it would be 3789^2, which is 14 mil...
3789 mm^2
The numerical value you calculated is calculated separately from the units. At the end, the units should conform with our notion of area which is some unit squared. In this case, it is mm^2.
So 3789mm^2 would be the answer? I'm just not understanding, because that would equate to over 370 cm
Try converting the radii given from mm to cm and see what you get.
40 mm = 4 cm
53 mm = 5.3 cm
That gives me 37.9
Correct.
You use a unit that was 1/10th of the previous value. When that difference is squared, you get 1/100th of a difference.
3789/100 = 37.89
And the units change as well, pi(cm)^2 - pi(cm)^2 = Area cm^2
I think I understand, so the area of the green shade would be 37.89mm?
3789 mm^2 or 37.89 cm^2
But that doesn't make sense, since the diameter of the green shaded circle is 13mm, and is 53mm from one end to the other from the entire circle (rather from the inner to outer circle edge), the hole in the middle is 40mm in diameter, so I don't understand how you'd get 37.89cm^2 from the area of the part that's shaded green
Ahh, my bad. The diameter of the inner circle is 40mm so its radius is 20mm.
It's too early in the morning for me. 😛
The radius of the larger circle is (40+13)/2 mm.
dw it's too late at night for me i'm so tired and confused 😭
Oh so the area of the green shade is or would be 26.5mm?
One moment, let me make a graph that will help you visualize the math.
Thank you so much
To find the area of the green donut, you calculate the area of the green circle with a radius of 26.5 mm and subtract the area of the red circle which has a radius of 20 mm. The difference in the two areas will the area of the remaining green donut.
I did not understand that 😭 but I tried rooting it, would this be correct? Or the correct formula?
so the answer would be about 11.5mm
Yes.
Okay thank you so much for all your help!
no?
The area of the large green circle is given by pi * (26.5)^2.
I thought bc you squared the number, you needed to root it again to get it back into mm
The are of the inner circle that is removed from large green circle is given by pi * (20)^2.
Yeah I understood that part
To find the area of the remaining green donut, you subtract the area of the inner circle that was removed from the larger green circle.
In the graph, the inner circle that was removed is represented by the red circle.
So it would be 2206-1257? And that would give 949
Yes.
You calculate the area of each of these circles.
When they overlap, you have a remaining green donut whose area can be found by subtracting the area of the red circle from the area of the green circle.
OH yes I see that, but then how would you derive the mm unit from 949?
Because the radius is measured in mm and it gets squared in the equation for the area of a circle, the unit is squared as well.
So then you'd square root it?
949mm^2 is is 900k I don't understand, that wouldn't be able to fit inside the green area
The unit itself is squared, not the numerical value which has already been squared.
26.5 was squared in the first line and then multiplied by pi.
So it would just be 949mm, you'd drop the square since the value as already been squared?
I got the same thing, but drop the unit out of the equation. I just used the area equation which I showed before in the ss, got the 2206 and 1256 as well, but why do you need the mm unit apart of the equation?
If the units are given, the units are required in the solution.
Because with what I did, you have the area in mm, you square it so it's no longer mm, then you root it so it goes back to the unit that it was before which was mm
You do not square root it.
But the part I'm not understanding is how you could fit 949mm^ in that green area, the diameter from the top of the outer circle, to the bottom of the outer circle is 13mm, so that's 13mm all around. So I don't see how you could fit 949mm^2 into that
Well ... that IS the area of the green donut.
It may not seem like it, but these two green areas are equal.
But that makes no logical sense, the equation must be wrong, because if that donut with those diameters existed irl, there wouldn't be 949mm^2 in that surface area, it wouldn't be physically possible
Because you're trying to get mm not mm^2
<@&286206848099549185> Would this be the correct equation for calculating the surface area of part shaded in green (in mm)?
Can u sum up the whole qn pls.
I'm trying to find surface area of the part shaded in green, would this equation be correct in finding it?
why did you take the underroot?
I thought you'd root it so you could get it in mm again
To convert metre to mm u multiply the length by 1000 but if u work with everything in mm units u will have ur answer in mm units
Or i should say
mm^2
Closed by @past fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I stuck at proving an upper bound for $\beta$ in the following context:
$\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta\in\mathbb{R}$ satisfy the following:
If $x\in[0,\frac{1}{4}]$, then $\alpha x\ge 0$.
If $x\in(\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{2}]$, then $4\beta x+(\alpha-\beta)\ge 0$.
If $x\in(\frac{1}{2},\frac{3}{4}]$, then $4\gamma x+(\alpha+\beta-2\gamma)\ge 0$.
If $x\in(\frac{3}{4},1]$, then $4\delta x+(\alpha+\beta+\gamma-3\delta)\ge 0$.
$3\alpha+2\beta+\gamma=16$
$-2\alpha-\beta+\delta=-16$
Now I am able to show that $\alpha\ge 0$ and $\beta\ge -\alpha$.
For the upper bound, I found $\beta\le 16-2\alpha$ but I was told that it is not the least one. I want to show that $\beta\le \frac{16-4\alpha}{3}$.
Can anyone help please.
Trenton
@upper crescent Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i solve: For what angles in the interval 0 < v < 90 (degrees) is sin3v < 1/2 true
Let u = 3v
@elfin rampart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
Explain what?
How to find q?
a2-a1
Arithemtic sequence.
Becuase when I post, no one answers.
Could you write it by hand and send me to DM, if not provlem?
So the solution is b2/b1, and then we get q, cus we dont have value?
It's just general formula
Ye
Ye
Ye is yes
.close
Closed by @lunar harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Also the everyone ping doesn’t work
Thabks.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im struggling to negate the cauchy sequence
would it go something
like
$\exists \epsilon > 0$ s.t. $\forall N \in \mathbb{N}, \exists a_n, a_m \in \mathbb{R}$ where $|a_n - a_m| \geq \epsilon$ $\forall n, m \geq N$ ?
Ashwyn
$\forall \epsilon > 0, \exists N \in \mathbb{N}$ s.t. $|a_n - a_m| < \epsilon$ $\forall n, m \geq N$
Ashwyn
yes, maybe write "forall n,m" before the inequality statement
so and now take this, turn every forall into exists and vice versa and make < into >=
and thats your negation
$\exists \epsilon > 0$ s.t. $\forall N \in \mathbb{N}, \exists n, m \geq N$ where $|a_n - a_m| \geq \epsilon$
Ashwyn
yep
Closed by @waxen steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I approach further
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
you may consider a substitution
in this case, the substitution is fairly identifiable simply by observing the differential equation you received after performing the reduction transformation
||but as a general note, you may recognize your reduced differential equation as a Bernoulli equation||
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this? The first part is to determine the function on the left graph (I already got this one, picture below). The second part says to find the function of g(x) which is a transformation of f(x). You have to find a,b,c,d real numbers that satisfy g(x) = af(bx + c) + d.
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
@trail void Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
First find the function g(x)
@trail void Has your question been resolved?
yeah.. how?
When I post question, no one answers. I don't mean to disturb your time, but I would appreciate your help.
.close
Closed by @trail void
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! I have a linear algebra related question - how do I find the angle between a plane (ax+by+cz=d) and the y-axis?
that could be many different angles. it might make more sense to ask for the angle between the normal vector to that plane and the y-axis
@lucid umbra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone tell me what this formula is called in english? I know it's related to Bernoulli's distribution, but I can't find what it's called in English.
That's the binomial distribution
one moment let me confirm
yup that seems right but it annoys me that the english Wikipedia page for it doesn't have this form of it written
either that or it's hard to find on said page
anyways, thanks
.close
Closed by @sonic canyon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does this have a differential at x = 2, my book says it does and accepts it as a correct answer but if 2+ and 2- isnt the same
can you show how theyre not the same?
X = 1.9 (2-) 3.8-2 = 1.8 X = 2.1 4.2 - 2+
oh yeah nvm its the same
but im still confused though;
so if left differential and right differential isnt the same how does it have a differential
or am i doing it wrong
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
what is this supposed to be?
differential from the left
2 -
the function is discontinus isnt it
thats just plugging in values close to 2 into x^2 - 2x, not the definition of the derivative
but you also cannot conclude this from only checking 1.9 and 2.1
well its asking me if its differentiable at x=2
okay sure you could find out it wasnt differentiable by showing it isnt continuous at that point
but this is still the case
so wait the book says its differentiable and i say its not which 1 is correct lol
why do you say its not differentiable?
cause its not continuous?
you cannot conclude it isnt continuous just from checking 1.9 and 2.1
for most functions f(1.9) and f(2.1) arent gonna be the same
you need to take values closer and closer to 2 from both sides and see if f(x) is approaching the same value
why not?
left and right isnt the same or i am too tired and i dont trust the book cuz it has lots of mistakes and wrong questions
how have you decided that the left and right limit isnt the same?
nvm its a turning point
then it does
i forgot its a turning point
2 is not a turning point of x^2 - 2x
2x-2 = 0 at x=2 so inclination is 0 and x square - 2x is a parabolic equation
wait no
fuck
yeah nvm im too tired
im doing everything wrong
you;re trying to determine whether x^2 - 2x is continuous at x =2 or not, this is good
you seem to think it isnt continuous at x = 2 but you're not telling us why
@coral pendant Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help i need to know if the answers on first pic is correct