#help-27
1 messages · Page 171 of 1
uhm i dont think im that advanced yet
all the info we got rn is that afb is a right triangle and that af is 5.12 fc is 2.88 and ac is 8
thats what im asking all along
so yea how does that work
not rly
well, do you agree that angle BAF and angle ACB are complementary?
angle A and angle C are complementary
why exactly? the picture is not drawn to scale btw, but if its not the visuals then idk how your suppose to get this
im so confused rn
the sum of angles of a triangle are 180
right ofc
angle ABC is 90 degrees
right
meaning the sum of angles A and angle C must be 90 degrees (they are complementary)
to form a triangle ABC
NOW
look at triangle ABF
it CONTAINS angle A
it contains a right angle
meaning it ALSO must contain an angle with the same measure as angle C
i gtg do some work rq, could u do the problem while im away, thanks
no
Nah.
flip one of the triangles so both face the same direction
.close
Closed by @charred tusk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@charred tusk Has your question been resolved?
this is a very unkind way to behave in this server and may result in reduced engagement from active helpers
how? I just wanted to ask if they can the problem while im not online, is that a problem? Doesn't that maximize production? Also because i simply dont understand his approach so while im away he can do the explanation. So when I can back instead of going back and fourth I can see if his approach makes any sense to me, and also see if his appraoch would work by checking the answer, if it does good, if it doesnt thats another story.
the helper is meant to help ofc, and as long as I do get the help, i really dont think that the "engagement" would be all that important
@charred tusk Has your question been resolved?
"if it doesnt, thats another story"
if it doesnt, what would you do
@charred tusk are you willing to work with the problem step by step?
right but i dont quiet know how
now first, identify which triangles youre seeing
to show proof that you can see the triangles, you should say which triangles youre seeing
well theres 3 triangles in total: abf, bfc, abc
but abc isnt important i dont think
so yea just bfc and abf
yea youll only need 2 of the triangles to solve this
that works
now because of similar triangles, a factor k will multiply from FC to FB
and similarly the same factor will multiply from FB to FA
right
could u elaborate a little?
hm interesting
this is because both triangles have the same shape and so should have the same ratios of sides
right YEA thats my question
k would be nice to know, but you wont need to
consider the following
FC * k = FB
FC / FB = k
FB * k = FA
FB / FA = k
FC / FB = k = FB / FA
FC / FB = FB / FA
if you havent seen this before, its a bit weird to combine at first
this is the few times though where each move has a geometric explanation
so if you need some more context to those steps, I can provide
yea please do
sure
now because of similar triangles, FB / FA must be the same ratio
the triangles are similar = they have the same shape = FB must be equivalently that many times bigger than FA
(you can consider a shape as being the same if the sides share the same relative size)
does this check out?
sure yea like dilation
the k here represents the ratio, the algebra is using k to match the equations together
by witing that they both equal k, the algebra can use this to show that both ratios are equal
are you with me so far?
my teacher did this question but didnt have a clear explanation but its like exactly the opposite of what u got
instead
its
af/bf = bf/fc
it does?
geometrically, youre still considering a ratio and matching them
FC / FB = FB / FA isn't wrong geometrically, right?
simply flipped
but still correct
i believe so, when u do cross multiplying i think its still the same
algebraically, you can get to either statement by raising both sides to the -1th power
doing this flips fractions around
(a/b)^-1 is b/a
yea so after that im guessing u get the bf squared and u just roo the other side
wait wait
with the maf*mfc
FC / FB = FB / FA
(FC / FB)^-1 = (FB / FA)^-1
FB / FC = FA / FB
wut
you can see I just ^-1 both sides and I get your version
so its just as correct
its not going to be easy remembering three fractions
instead its easy to remember that corresponding sides should match up
and their ratios should be equal
ah right we just consider a ration of x or k
and then we just make the equation make them equal to each other
ah ok comparison
alr so just remember the ratio
you can do ratio between same sides of a triangle yea
these ratios are called "trigonometric ratios"
AF / FB and BF / FC are both "trigonometric ratios"
so aslong as we know 1 of the sides is the same we can do this
this particular method
but its not like the sides being that different would break a lot
anyways the sides matching now now allows you to solve for BF
do you know how?
oh yea i did it alr just needed some clarification on the similarity part
ty for actually unlike the other 2
i found that to be much easier
yea?
do you want to know why the function f(x) has to have two negative signs in it?
why that wouldnt cancel?
elaborate
first, we need an easier way to think of this "greatest integer function"
usually this is phrased as "the greatest integer that is less than x" which can be simplified
if you have a decimal x, you round down towards -∞
3.5 would round down to 3
-3.5 would round down to -4
right
that is what the "greatest integer function" does
right
for this raeson its more commonly known as the "floor function"
and using the better symbols of:
,,\lfloor x\rfloor
mtt07734
(this is to be compared with the "least integer function" or "ceiling function" which forcibly rounds towards +∞)
(which is $\lceil x\rceil$)
mtt07734
you can tell these apart, right?
right
now for that double-negative
if you place a positive number x in there,
the - sign moves it into the negatives
because of this, the floor function rounding it towards -∞ will move it away from 0
the outside - sign moves it back into the positives
-floor(-3.5) = 4
compare this to if you just used floor normally
floor(3.5) = 3 rounds towards 0 instead
so the reason for that double-negative is to get the floor function to round up instead of down
yea my mistake, thats a typo
interesting that trick
its just like the ceiling function isnt it
yea yea i got a little confused by what u mean but yes
this is a way you can define the ceiling function
haha i mean yea i thought u meant like power to negative 1 or smth
but yes
,,-\lfloor-x\rfloor=\lceil x\rceil
this is pretty easy to understand
mtt07734
so its a trick because you didnt learn the ceiling function yet
but they wanted you to develop that intuition on your own
bit of a tall order but its not that bad
haha yea i thought u meant power to negative one or smth, but yes this is a pretty easy concept
anyways uh yea regarding gif
?
our class sped through it in like 2 days did a test and just went to trig after it
oh thats your abbreviation
so we didnt
rly
go in depth into ceilling
we had a few word problems and stuff and just eneded there
anyways its better to know then not
yea
the way it sounds,
this is one of those things youll just know
so they give you a few problems to easily slip that into you
right and uhhh smth regarding trig
i dont know why im not getting it this seems so easy
ive did this on khan so many times but like this seems so weird rn
go post it
man I never know why they dont teach you this
youre my only lead rn
consider the following
then you try to answer whats happening after I show this
youve figured out that $\sin(?)=\frac{13}{31}$
mtt07734
now you need to somehow figure out the angle inside
multiplication and division isnt going to help you here
not always
1 sec i might remember this
the sine of this angle is 13 / 31
if only there was a way to
invert this sine
go from 13 / 31 to the angle
we havnt started the unit yet
but yes let me try smth rq
alr
(I hope youre not just testing sin(1°), sin(2°), sin(3°)... in the calculator)
ofc not
lol
its not cosecant
or was it negative sin
this has to be a separate function in its own right
subtraction is the inverse to addition
division is the inverse to multiplication
and a special function is the inverse to sine
functional inverse
ok lol i forgot everything i learnt online tell me the solution
mtt07734
the -1 is the function inverse kind of -1
people usually are not happy seeing a number like that and its not an exponent
it can lead to confusion
like how $f^{-1}(x)$ isnt $\frac1{f(x)}$
mtt07734
it was this ha
???
i remember now
- negative sine: -sin(x) would be additive inverse, it with sin(x) adds to 0 (not what youre looking for)
- reciprocal sine: 1/sin(x) or csc(x) would be multplicative inverse, it with sin(x) multiplies to 1 (not what youre looking for)
- inverse sine: sin^-1(x) or arcsin(x) would be functional inverse, it with sin(x) composes to x
haha yea
I prefer to use arcsin so I dont type ^-1
wrong wording
now for the problem
very nice
similarly theres arccos, arctan, arccsc, arcsec, and arccot
a functional inverse for the six trig functions
alr let me speed throgh ill see if i got any difficult stuff before i head to sleep
ive already learnt this online last year but just forgot most of them
alr its enough for today ima head to bed
alr thanks mate
np
.close
Closed by @charred tusk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is your question
(you also don't need to find y', the bottom half is sufficient - then put the c1 you found back into the original)
@nimble pier Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone know how to do proofs?
angle jkm is not congruent to angle mlk
u sure? my teacher was able to solve in class today with my classmate while i was working on other things
This can be proved by symmetry
Hint: find the rhombi
@kindred plume Has your question been resolved?
i don’t know what any of this means 😭
Focus on the perpendicular bisectors and what they tell you about the surrounding triangles
A proof by symmetry is where you show that the figure is symmetrical and use that to show that certain things are congruent
Would symmetry mean reflective?
I’m sorry we haven’t had real math class in like 3 weeks 😭
We could have multiple kinds of symmetry but it would be reflective in this particular case
or what even would be reflective? i have no clue at all, these are the only things i have written down
@kindred plume Has your question been resolved?
@kindred plume Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$-2x^2-6x+2=mx+6 \ -2x^2-6x-mx-4 = 0 \ -2x^2-x(6+m)-4=0 \ \Delta b^2-4ac = 0 \ (m+6)^2-4\cdot -2 \cdot -4 = 0 \ m^2+12m+36-32 = 0 \ m^2+12m+4 = 0 \ \ $then use quadration formula: $\ \frac{-12\pm\sqrt{128}}{2} \ -6\pm 4\sqrt{2}$
pixel
yes, that's what you solve for when you do the quadratic formula for a quadratic in m isn't it?
I am proud, seems like you've got the hang of this now and no negative errors anymore 😄
all thanks to you
so yeah
im up to week 5 content
woohoo!
just 2 more weeks
and im all caught up with like math methods
then i'll have math specialist
💀
i do two different math subjects
fun
thing is
i was on vacation
and i came 4 weeks late into school
i had an exam first week back
and assignments due
so its been really hard
so yeah
im still catching up
its week 6 now
so my brain rn is overloading with like all the info
from all different subjects
but like theres nothing else that I can do apart from try my best
so like seriously thank you for being patient with me
😭
keep working on it, seems like you are doing well, you have like actual algebra skills and ability to retain information for more than 10 minutes which is more than i can say for a lot of math students i come across 😅
oh dw once i get to math specialist which is the higher level of math and i start doing vectors
im gonna make you hate me
🗣️ 🔥
vectors WAS easy last year (year 10)
but this year, the stuff they're doing now is a lot harder
we have like 121237 different formulas, its crazy
there's like like 0 memorization when it comes to vectors, everything is super intuitive
i cant think of any formulas you need to remember
(must mean ive forgotten them)
get this math subject out of the way, THEN ill actually start my next one
just got 2 more weeks worth of content to do
oh week 5 is easy
🔥
what are you waiting for, get to more studying
😭
bathroom break and ill get back to work
also I really like how you explained stuff, is it fine if I add you and ask you stuff in dms?
or do u have like a server that I could join and ask you there
appreciate it, but i prefer not to get DMs, feel free to ping me when you open a help channel here and if i'm around ill check it out, but not excessively
Closed by @visual maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
(bathroom break) 😄
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"Show that the points A, B, and C with position vectors, a= 3i -4j -4k, b= 2i -j +k, c = i -3j -5k respectively form the vertices of a right-angled triangle."
in this question how would i know the direction of right and triangle sides SO i can know whats the initial point and whats the terminal point of vector AB For example, if I want to find the vector AB, then AB = (x2-x1)i + (y2-y1)j + (z2-z1)k. Here, x2, y2, z2 are the terminal points and x1, y1, z1 are the initial points. My question was: how would I know what's the initial point and what's the terminal point? A can also be x2 or B can also be x2 it depends on the vector AB direction
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frozen python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just want a more experienced set of eyes on this to make sure i'm not making any crucial mistakes
the assignment is to convert a point to polar coordinates
i'm iffy on the value i got for r
Sqrt(b^2+c^2) is not equal to sqrt(b^2 * c^2)
the other answer i got for this was sqrt(0)
@steady lake Has your question been resolved?
@steady lake Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @steady lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
do you know how to phrase this in terms of a constrained optimization problem?
i.e. maximize () subject to the constraint ()
im not sure what ur asking, generally when i do these types of questions involving lagrange, i put T(x,y,z) and the constraint equation G(x,y,z) together as L(x,y,z,lambda) = T(x,y,z) - lambda*G(x,y,z), then partially differentiate them to x,y,z and lambda.
so far all questions ive done leaves the partial derivitives of x,y, and z only in terms of x/y/z and lambda, where i can substitute into lambda's partial derivative and then resubstitute into equation to see which values give a critical value, clearly not the case here and i cant think of any method other than this
i think ive done what u described here
top left of photo
@spark ruin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In this problem i was able to obtain the color the spoke if we wanted to use atleast 2 colours. This is x^p - x
But i cannot obtain the number of paintjobs if two paint job are the same if we can obtain one from the other by rotation
<@&286206848099549185>
Can you please resend the image attached, as it is not of high quality or precisely, the text is not readable
can you describe all of the possible ways in which two paintjobs are considered the same?
suppose i gave you
RRBYG and YGRRB
are these the same paintjob? why or why not?
They are the same because if you think of paintjob in terms of the diagram of a wheel given the text, you can obtain one from the other simply by rotating
ok so how many paintjobs are identical to RRBYG then?
idk
The theorem of number theory that this problem proves is known as Burnside's lemma or the Orbit-Stabilizer theorem, which provides a method for counting orbits of a group action.
i dont think thats the theorem it proves
It is as far as I remember
use the same visualization you just described
It is fermat theorm
i think burnside lemma is far more abstract than this problem instance
There are p-1 similar paintjobs
Fermat's little theoram?
perfect!
now can you imagine how we would group these paintjobs?
suppose you made boxes
and in each box, you put all of the same paintjobs together
Using at least two colors: k^p ways.
what do you notice about these boxes?
yes
you forgot -p on the end for substracting the single color case
There a 6 in each box
a 6?
My bad
you mean p-1?
I meant p
oops yeah p not p-1 haha
so the number of distinct paintjobs is the number of boxes
you have the total number of paintjobs counting the rotations
you know how to group them into boxes
how many boxes are there?
$\frac{x^p - p}{p}$
schrödinger
This represents the number of boxes or equivalence classes. So, the number of boxes is given by the sum:
[
\frac{1}{p} \sum_{r=1}^{p} \gcd(r,p)
]
KavyaSahai
bingo
this expression must be an integer
and you can then turn this into a modular arithmetic statement
that proves fermat's little theorem
i have not read the book, but this does look like a book i want, from the pages you sent
No, I haven't but surely would read, if I would improve my English
i am a combi enthusiast, the combi problem at base is very straightforward and relatively simple
the relation to fermat's little theorem mostly comes from two observations:
- familiarity with fermat's little theorem, recognizing its algebraic form
- im pretty used to the idea of applying integer arguments in combi. often times you need to sanity check your answers, and if something you need to count gives an answer that cant even be an integer, you know you messed up
if you apply the integer argument, little theorem follows pretty directly
do you mind sharing the book source?
.close
Closed by @flat raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1.Why is there a "+ " plus & not a "-" minus sign.
2. How do we decide which one is alpha and beta?
1- they factored the - as well
2- the letters are arbitrary. Choose whatever you want
- wdym, please expand
- alright, so they're just variables & i can switch alpha & beta if i like
,, -a -b = -(a+b)
wish i was a consonant & not a mere variable
its calling factoring
i dont get it
the opposite of distribution
what is factoring
whats ur native language btw
if it is not english
could be easier to communicate thru that
just do it in english
ok
as in just the term, forgot the meaning
ohhh
though how the + come here?
yeah sure u can think of it that way
its because
- is shorthand for writing multiplication by -1
like uh
,align
-a-b = -1\2a + -1\2b &= -1\8{a+b} \ &=-\8{a+b}
mhm
oh wait
if it was minus instead the value would change
minus where exactly
woops wrong reply
meant this
the thing we're talking about
u gotta be more specific
no.1
yeah what about it
what we've been discussing all this time
what part of it do u want to be minus'd
ok so u r asking if -4(x-2)?
yeah
yes
omg
-(a-b) = -a+b
maff aint for me
yeah so like synonyms
lmao
bye
.close
Closed by @full snow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i dont think im thankful
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So
I need to think of a sum of an that converges, sum of bn diverges and lim an/bn = 1
I need some help
@calm maple Has your question been resolved?
Hello , i like building stuff and please vizit my roblox game
Just Run!
Thanks for 50 views!
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this problem my teacher demonstrated? Specifically the highlighted part?
The chat is occupied
Literally everything else makes sense
Np dude
cos(x) ranges from -1 to 1. can you think of a value of cos(x) that when squared is greater than 0?
@leaden nimbus are you wondering why -1<=cosx<=1?
hint: ||for all real x, x^2 >= 0||
Im wondering why when my teacher squared everything-1 became 0
a square of a real number cannot be negative, so the lower bound of -1 is replaced with 0
u good
all g
.close
Closed by @leaden nimbus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
4 of the same generators in 3 hours spend 15 dollars worth of fuel. How many dollars worth of fuel would 3 generators spend in 6 hours?
Perhaps compute the amount spent per generator per hour?
1 generator in 3 hrs uses 15/4 dollars
1 generator in 1 hr uses 5/4 dollars
3 generators in 1 hr uses 15/4 dollars
3 generators in 6 hrs uses 45/2 dollars
@bright juniper Has your question been resolved?
Wrong
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
uh is it wrong?
what's the correct answer
There are 4 answers nor sure wich one is correct
can u send em?
Ohh 45/2 is correct
@bright juniper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone take a look at my work and see what I did wrong in the trig sub
I got 2 different answers when I tried to integrate this intergal
I first tried with trig sub and then tried with u sub
why did you cancel out the $2cos(\theta)$'s after substituting everything
Triaxyz
yes
Closed by @rustic hare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can some one help please
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
#help-27 message
What’s your confusion?
on line 5, how did your +4 become -6?
About the reliability of your answer?
you can read discord but not the solution?
you need an optometrist, not internet strangers and certainly not doing math
OH wait i get it now
where there is a y you put what y equals
sorry i be dumb some times
i think the answers where photo copied and the paper its on its looking good and my head hearts when looking at it
!close
.close
Closed by @rose pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How is this equivalent
you can "rationalize the denominator" on the first one by multiplying by $\frac{\sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{3}} = 1$
cloud
?
multiplying any number by 1 gives the same number back
Yea
and any number divided by itself is 1
Yea
so you can multiply numbers by 1 (in a specific way) to make them look different (even though they are the same number)
in this case, multiplying either of them by $\frac{\sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{3}}$ is the same as multiplying by 1, and will make one of them look like the other (after simplifying)
cloud
Closed by @shadow quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
identify the surface who's vector equation is
please ping me when you respond, I have discord open in the background
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
very helpful
.close
Closed by @abstract prism
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, does anyone know how to solve this equation? I don't know how to continue
Modus
hhmm, why not?
last line is still incorrect
I recommend doing
25/4 = (2/5)^(-2)
after u-sub
and then just compare the powers
find u, come back to x that's it
$$\Big(\frac25\Big)^{u^2+1}=\Big(\frac{25}4\Big)^{2-3u} \iff \Big(\frac25\Big)^{u^2+1}=\Big(\frac{2}5\Big)^{2(3u-2)}$$
Modus
good
Closed by @idle coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What value dose n need to have so the equation dosent have an answer
wdym
i dont understand
10^x-20=n-10^x+1
10^x[11]-20=n
10^x=(n+20)/11
i need to find the value of n so the equation dosent have any answers
What values can 10^x never take?
It is strictly greater than 0
(it can never take 0 as well)
so when (n+20)/25 <= 0, there will be no solution
ok do i solve that now?
yea
so thats the answer?
yup
so n cant be more or equal to 20?
when n <= -20, the equation will have no solution
@bright juniper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
First missing value in table should be 4, and second should be -5
is my graph correct?
also is the curve smooth enough?
<@&286206848099549185>
😭
help
It looks correct 👍
is it smooth enough though?
So for c)i) I am getting x=0, x=2.55
is that correct
anyone pls help? 😭
I would use desmos graphing/graphing calculator to validate your answers (appropriate if your allowed to use a graphing calculator) OR plug the values you got back into the function to see if it equals 0 (appropriate if allows your teacher does not allow you to use a graphing calculator)
It would seem that your answers are c(i) are correct.
Also, if you look on the graph you drew, you see that the function is equal to 0 at x = 0 and x ~ 2.5
@stoic crystal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In the diagram i got a triangle with 3 circles the circles radius is 5cm i need to find the triangles perimeter
What have you tried?
@bright juniper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help please
Ive been at this for like 2 days and I cannot get the answer the teacher provided
I tried this and I gave up
@digital egret Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @digital egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help
What are the function types given by ur teacher
Polynomial is a something raised to a (constant) power
Exponential is something raised to a (variable) power
That's exponential
Hmm
reading
Alright thx
just looking at it, it's probably going to be logarithmic
U change the x’s to -x?
If you plug in -x, then the graph would shoot off to the left
this has increasing y values along with increasing x values
that would shoot off to positive infinity on the -x axis
sort of (temperature won't increase to infinity, but that's not the point of the exercise)
But you want it to do so as x increases
if you're looking at the -x axis, x (temperature) would be decreasing
It helps to recognize what certain families of graphs look like
this is a logarithmic graph
and this is a graph of the sqrt(x)
So would u transform up?
So like f(x)=-2^x+y value
Where x = 0, you'd simply add where you want your y value to start
in this case, it's 35, right?
Yea
So now you've got (the function you need to find) + 35
That gets you your starting point
Wait so it’s -2^x
Yea I got no clue lmao
Think about -2^x
I’m confused about the transformation
"transformation" is a fancy way of saying, "What do you add/subtract/multiply/divide in order to shift the basic shape of the graph to this thing over here"
Take the graph of x for example
If you just add 10, what happens? The transformation is an increase of 10 on the y-intercept
So would it be f(-x)=-2^x+35
First off, it won't be negative
think about what happens to -2 when you raise it to a series of powers
What's -2 ^ 1?
Just -2, right?
Yea
What happens with -2^2?
-4
It's +4
Oh yea
a negative times a negative gives you a positive
so if you use a negative coefficient with a variable exponent, your answers will end up very different from one sequential exponent to the next
negative exponents give you negative results, positive exponents give you positive results
so the exponents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6...
So 2^x+35
The graph goes sideways from what you'd expect
please do
lol
you'll notice that if you just raise a constant to a variable exponent, the graph immediately shoots off to infinity
whereas the graph you're given in the problem has a very gradual increase into infinity
As I said, I believe it's going to be a logarithmic function
@shrewd thistle -E(x)=2^x+35
Yo?
.close
Closed by @fleet jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
here is the question i am triying to do
i do not know where to start i am a little behind on a lesson so any ehlp is appreciated
@worthy oxide Has your question been resolved?
@worthy oxide does this help
What do you do about the angles in the cos
like the cos(0)
let me look at the problem tho
this helps a lot
thank you very much
lmk which part u are struggling on, its hard to do the entire problem on my laptop t-t
ok
yea it all makes sense
yea ok
yea
but now i am still confused on how you get rid of the angle sign inside of the sin
i did trig sub and got u^4/4 plug in sin(angle)
but i dont know what to do with the angle
show me exactly
also i dont know if the next part is incoorect
ok
i will send pick
sorry my work is mesy
but where i am at this part at the bottom right
idk if i messed up the trig sub
but where i am confused is getting rid of the angle inside the sin
ok so would i just convert it to x/3 instead of sin ?
yes
since the original question was in term of x, you want the final answer to be in terms of x
oh shoot my bad. i forgot add the manipulation on the 2nd step it should be 2(27sin^3theta) * 3cos(theta) * 3cos(theta) (dtheta)
@worthy oxide
oh ok
yea let me try one more time
i think i better understand the first steps
or i understand it better
yeah. its nice how x is already given to guyz already
alright this is my answer
it does not look right tbh
it is the one at the top right
.close
Closed by @worthy oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So I'm having a lot of trouble with this. The parameter variation technique has yielded (v1)' = -t^-6e^6t and (v2)' = t^-7e^6t but I don't know how to integrate these to get my v1 and v2 functions
My Diff EQ course has an awful textbook
@ocean quest Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I’d recommend solving this by substitution; i.e. taking y = Ae^Bt(Ct^-5 + Dt^-4 … Gt^-1 + H) it might be less messy than integrating those
I thought that wasn't possible for powers in the negatives
Sure it is, you can do it for anything
Oh and you’d only have to go up to a t^-5 term
It’s a bit guess-ish but integration would probably give you a similar sort of thing since you’d have to do repeated integration by parts
The god-awful textbook put this type of problem under the Variation of Parameter chapter and then didn't give any information on how to solve it using the method that leads you straight into a brick wall
also you didnt use variation of parameters correctly
you forgot to multiply by g(t)
small typo but it entirely gets rid of your e^
@ocean quest try consulting this instead to learn variation of parameters https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/classes/de/VariationofParameters.aspx
I didnt learn it this way but it should at least give you some justification for whats happening
what matters more is this at the end
thank you so much
for y'' - 6y' + 9y = 0, the homogeneous version of your DE,
y1 and y2 are the two homogeneous solutions
W(y1, y2) is y1 y2' - y2 y1' in case you dont know that
g(t) is the t^-7 e^3t (the bit at the end)
just in case you need to do a hard integral though, this suggestion works wonders and makes sure youre at least not doing an integral, only derivatives
Ive "cheated" a few problems by just doing that and choosing a good guess
remember that your guess needs to be general enough to work
Well, looking back, this stems not from me using the variation of parameters incorrectly, but me being a complete idiot and factoring out the wrongly signed solution from the auxiliary equation
Thank you both so much!
np
@ocean quest Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this with
subs u
@lament schooner Has your question been resolved?
im trying to do that
im abit confused
i ended up with 14x^2 * u
just plug this in the place of x^2
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello! how do you find an equation of a circle that is tangent to two lines and internally tangent to the equation of another circle?
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
oh this is my problem
let me give more context
the equations of the two straight lines are y=0, y=(12root(6))x/19+ (24root(6))/19
and the equation of the other circle is (x-1/2)^2+(y-24/(4root(6)))^2=(35/(4root(6)))^2
if someone could help by using latex on the equations, that would be helpful as it would be much easier to understand
is this better
Yes
ok, thank u
@long trout Has your question been resolved?
This might be a bit long, but assume the center as (h,k)
Now you have this point and two lines, so try finding the distance of this point from these two lines||(it will be the radius of the circle)||, you should get the relation between h and k
If two circles touch internally then the distance between their centers is the magnitude of the difference between their radii
yes, i found the relation between h and k
idk what to do about the two circles touching internally part
I wrote it in the last lines
so lets say we have the equation (x-1/2)^2+(y-24/(4root(6)))^2=(35/(4root(6)))^2
the equation of the circle internally tangent to this is (x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2
Right
Also
The unknown circle touches the x axis(coz it's the tangent), can we say that the y coordinate of the center is the radius?
Note that this would be the distance of the point from x axis, which is the radius
yes i think u can say this
So k=r then, which simplifies it a bit here
Now you have the centers of 2 circles and their radii
The positive difference between their radii will be the distance between the two centers
Does that make sense?
yes
now i have found the equation
