#help-27
1 messages · Page 164 of 1
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
so the rules in the textbook are correct?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
imagine a rectangular prism with a square bottom
and a square top
when the side length of the square changes, the height also changes, so that the combined area of all sides add up to 80 cm^2
decide a function V(s) on how the volume is affected by the side length
i am kinda stuck
like i don't know where to start
but i've drawn this piece of art
Hi let me try to help you out
To start out we should get an idea of how to use the given information that the combined area is 80 cm^2
Could you express this combined area in h and s?
So we have that 2s^2 + 4hs = 80
yes
similarly, could we express the volume in h and s?
s^2 x h
We thus have
V = s^2 * h
2s^2 + 4hs = 80
But we need to find V as a function purely of s
What we could try to do here is substitute the h in V by using the second equation
Does what I'm saying make sense?
yes
So what you could try to do is rearrange the second equation in such a way that you get:
h = ...
and then substitute that value in the first equation to obtain a function for the volume purely in s
okey wait
i need to do something
but i think ill try to do what you told me to do
good luck!
@sacred cloak Has your question been resolved?
V = s^2 * h
2s^2 + 4hs = 80
Hey, have you tried to rearrange the second equation?
im at the supermarket right now
Ah okay, nevermind then :D
@sacred cloak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question 3) please
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
X^2=5x hello i need help with this
its pretty basic
says i am suppose to get either x=5 or x=0
but i am not sure how i get there
i just put it in a calculator
the best way is to write both of them on the same side.
so x^2-5x=0?
then you will get x(x-5)=0
wait, how did you get x(x-5)=0
it is the same thing, just do the multiplication
what do i multiplie? xD
x(x-5)=x^2-5x
they are equal
x(x-5)=0. From this, you can see that there are 2 solutions of this eqn.
I am not following, we need to take a step back
I am still confused how we get the x(x-5)=0
x^2-5x=0 i do this first right?
move the 5x over the = and it changes to minus
then you can write this -> x(x-5)=0
you remove the x in x^2 to get only 1 x?
but how does 5 x become x-5
maybe i am missing a basic rule
ok, x(x-5) do this multiplication like 3*(4-2)
it doesn't matter, do this x(x-5)=?
then it be x^2-5X=?
yes
Oh ok
then your problem is this one x(x-5)=0.
yes
and then i can +5 on both sides?
x*x=5
divine by 2 on both side
x=2.5
hmm, thats not the answer
either x is zero for the solution or x-5 is zero
if a*b=0 then a=0 or b=0
@jagged loom Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
There are 9 types of candy, a bag of candy has 19 pieces of candy.
If I want **atleast **one candy of each type, how many ways can such a bag of candy be arranged?
Say you are trying to make such a bag of candy. What is the first thing you do to ensure there’s at least one type of candy in the bag
The first step I took was that I concluded that the first 9 pieces can only be arranged one way.
So the question can be simplified to "How many ways can you sort 9 types of candy in a bag with 10 candy"
but after that it grinded to a halt
Alright so you’ve put in one of each candy
Now how many options do you have
For the next piece of candy
9?
Still 9.
And for the next choice…
But there can't be 9^10 ways, since the order the candies are placed doesn't matter, so it narrows the options down quite a bit.
Combinations not permutations if I understood the question right.
Hmm that is true
The problem could also be, how many ways can you distribute 10 identical objects into 9 containers
That would be equivalent
You could take the stars and bars approach https://brilliant.org/wiki/identical-objects-into-distinct-bins/
Identical objects into distinct bins is a problem in combinatorics in which the goal is to find the number of distributions of a number of identical objects into a number of distinct bins. This problem has a similar wording to problems such as distinct objects into distinct bins and distinct objects into identical bins, but the approach for thes...
This website can likely explain it better
Oh thanks!
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Consider the following data polot with points (-2, 2), (-1, 1), (0, -2), (1,0), and (2,-1)
a) Sketch a line of best fit for this data. Take your best guess without any computations.
b) Find the constant r corresponding to this data.
c) Find the least-squares line of best fit using linear algebra methods
pretty sure I know how to find the constant r. it's the other stuff i'm not sure about. help would be appreciated
Do you know the standard function of linear regression?
I don't think so, no
mind explaining?
Sure
thanks
no problem!
so once I find the average, I can solve for r using that formula?
No
standard deviation
(y- the average value of y)=(r•standard deviation of x/ standard d of y)•(x-the average value of x)
@fierce scarab Has your question been resolved?
okay thanks, is this for b or c?
It solves every of them
a) make a guess
b)Find r
c)Use the prototype I provided
@fierce scarab Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @night sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\int \frac{cos^2x}{sin^2x}dx:$
putridplanet
ok
And further the integral of tan^2x is not sec^4x
Maybe you should use a trig Pythagorean identity for this?
At least give it a try
Yeah that should help since if you turn cos^2x into 1-sin^2x you can split it up into two integrals of csc^2x and 1
I believe there's also a way to do u-sub here as well, but trig identities are probably the easiest way
Might be easier
my suggestion is to use the sin^2 and cos^2 to double angle identities and it should simplify pretty nicely
Yeah that may work too
There’s more than one way to skin a sheep as they say
It also applies to calculus
especially as you get to calc 2, problems start having a ton of viable solutions
theres also this less common idea
The thing about the Pythagorean approach that I suggest is it reduces to the antiderivative of 1 and csc^2x
But the derivative of cot is -csc^2x
So it’s basically no work
@digital jacinth Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @digital jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
To apply this corollary
say I'm taking the limit of the top function as x->0
is it enough to say that, it is basically the same as inverting all of the 1/x terms and taking x-> infinity
so the corollary applies?
I'm not sure how to phrase it properly
What limit are you looking at
In general this is just a change of variables
I thought you were trying to apply it to something
Well then yeah this formulation is begging for u = 1/x
Closed by @weak cove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Though do worry about double sidedness maybe
Hello!
I am trying to solve an equation, but after an hour of long dividing and percentages mumbo jumbo I have arrived at answers that do not match the multiple choice options even remotely.
The problem
A bottle of cleaner has a label that reads "now 20% more." The bottle contains 28.8 ounces. How many ounces of cleaner are in a regular container?
The answer options are:
A. 20oz
B. 22oz
C. 23oz
D. 24oz
[What I did]
I googled how to get the percentage of a whole number, which brought me to this.
Part/Whole= (answer1) x 100 = (final answer)
I don't fully understand this. So I looked up how to divide a whole number by a percentage. I did not fully understand this either. So then I tried to use the answer options in the equation. I used 28.8 as the whole and 20(the first option) as the part. I figured 20 could be part of 28.8, it being an answer option and also smaller. I ended up even more confused with long division. I ended up with the answer of 70 (0.7 x 100), but that is not an answer option.
Do I apply some other layer of math? Am I completely missing what I am actually supposed to do?
Eventually, I gave up and just googled 20% of 28.8 and got 5.76. but 5.76 x 100 is 576. That is even further from the answer options. I tried making 20% be 0.2 and divide 28.8 by 0.2 instead, but that got me 144 even. That is also too big of a number.
Something is clearly wrong, but I cannot identify it. Even when I Google the answer, I cannot apply it.
I do not understand this at all. Please explain how I am supposed to solve this. I am terrible at math, so the simplest explanation please.
I would show my equations so far, but the page is very confusing to look at and likely would not help.
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
Oh. I thought that it had closed so I could use it. My bad.
Ok
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\int_0^{\frac{\pi}4} f(\tan x)dx = 4$
FungusDesu
$\int_0^1 \frac{x^2f(x)}{x^2+1}dx = 2$
FungusDesu
Evaluate $\int_0^1 f(x)dx$
FungusDesu
i let u be tanx
which turns the first integral to one that is kinda similar to the second
but its stuck with a x^2
dont know what to do bout that
imo this is more obvious if you try to turn the 2nd integral into one that looks like the 1st
@solar goblet Has your question been resolved?
hmm
$\int_0^{\frac{\pi}4} \tan^2uf(\tan u)du$
this is what i got
i cant see why it would help
a few things...
first, you need to convert dx into du
my bad i did, but forgot to tex it
oh youre damn right
👀
FungusDesu
IBP?
you achieved your goal of "making an integral that looks similar to the other one"
you already substituted x = tan(u), so ibp won't help you get closer to finding a value for the integral of f(x) here
@solar goblet any updates?
@solar goblet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is what i have for now, i don't know what to do next
Whats the question
.
Ok sorry im rather dumb
just use the taylor series for $2\log(x)$
riemann
i don't know it
oh wait hmm
i need help with it
i know denominator should be n!
and its alternating? so (-1)^n?
or is it (-1)^n+1
this is what you should be doing
oh
you should just have the formula for taylor series for log written somewhere
or in your textbook
i don't have it for log
,w taylor series log(x) about x=1
yea use this
but multiply everything by 2?
yes 2 * log(x) = 2 * series expansion for log(x)
so the coefficient is 2/50?
what's the sign of the even terms in the expansion
yea looks right
Closed by @finite stream
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help
plz
translation plz
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay I dont know where to start solving this problem. And i would like somebody to help explain this to me
,tex .exp rules
riemann
so what do i do from here do i just flip the x to get 1/x^7
am i doing this right
@misty granite Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help on how should I solve this empirical rule question
Idk how should I go on this
First calculate the z scores
Z scores? My instruction videos haven't taught that yet
It means how many standard deviations away from the mean
For example (55-67)/6=-2 so 55 has z score of -2 (2 standard deviations smaller thqn the mean)
but then how do I caculate the percentage?
Use your graph here
I'll do part a for you
55 is two standard deviations smaller than the mean
79 is two standard deviations greater than the mean
So from the graph we add the corresponding probabilities
From the center we need two from the left and two from the right
ah so 79 would be from the right
and 55 is to the left
Yes
man I'm already starting to hate my professor already
Why
oh its watch videos to learn and recognize other random BS that weren't in the videos on your own
They don't teach?
yeah my professor is mostly, watch videos and teach on your own and I'll review some of the concepts at times we meet
I mostly go down to my math tutor in person to reinforce these concepts
and ones weren't mentioned in the video
apparently I'm not alone, my fellow classmates hate the videos and material as well
but anyway
thanks for the help
I think I could do the other parts of the question on my own
.close
Closed by @obsidian junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I check if
$$\int_1^{\infty} \frac{e^{-x}}{x} d x$$
is divergent or convergent?
dgh
From what I can tell, the function is the same as 1/(x*e^x)
How do I know what this improper integral evaluates to?
it's not hard to check convergence
where
you get $\int_1^\infty e^{-x}dx \geq \int_1^\infty \frac{e^{-x}}{x}dx$
WhereWolf(ping if needed)
the left is convergent thus so is the right
how did you reach this conclusion
which part
oh it's a well-known theorem
what is it called
so if that left integral is greater then it means a divergence?
or i'm not following
@wary ruin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
nice one ibrahim
Can you please stick to your own channel?
<@&286206848099549185>
let s,m,l be number of small,medium,large cups sold respectively
you should be able to form 3 equations from the question
first one with "three times as many medium cups were sold as small cups"
second one with "number of large cups sold was 140 less than the number of medium cups"
third one wihth "total of the drink sales was $1360"
so then i subsititute the three equations into the last?
yeah that works
idk how to layout this statement
would it be 3m=s?
yes
so how would i subsititute a equation in a equation
3m=s
l=140-m
l+m+s=1360
oh nvmd
?
so what would m be
both your second and third equations are wrong
140-m+3m+?=1360
sorry got the wrong way
nah it's fine to make mistakes
so for the last one you would multiply by the price
yep
would i use this but just substitute the price for m where neeeded?
yes
-142=1360?
no
total sales is 1360
so 1.5s+2m+2.5l=1360
price * number sold = total sales
so 1.5(3m)+2m+2.5(m-140)=1360?
@crude meteor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I solve this question?
so far I know I can use multiplicity and end behaviour to roughly draw the graph of the equation but that is if it factorizes
f(x) factorizes to (x-1)(x squared - 7x - 7)
how do I proceed from there
and is there a better and easier approach?
You can just equate the first derivative to 0
Those values of x will be turning points
x = 0 and x = 16/3
at those points, the graph has a slope equal to 0 therefore they are turning points?
Yeah
if so then I have two turning points? also what does it mean to have them with a coordinate axis?
as in the options
and g(x) is just a flipped and stretched graph of f of x right so it too has only two turning points
You've to check the y coordinate of the turning points
how
and what about them
Just plug in the x values in the original function to find y coordinate
And because the options are asking us to check that
Only the sign tho
aa yes gotcha
got it
Nice
can I ask another question here related to the same concepts or do I have to
start a new help?
/close
What is your question
@indigo charm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this
I would graph the function on Desmos
is there no simpler way to do it on paper?
@indigo charm Has your question been resolved?
Do you know any root of the cubi function?
This question requires observation
@indigo charm ping me when you’re up
hey
um no
yes that's how it's asked to be solved
Find it
using multiplicity, end points and all
Look it more carefully
You can rearrange the cubic function and place the redundant coefficients out side the function
ah I can't understand. Someone shared a solution can you have a look at it, share your insights on it and then explain your method as well
Do you have the answer? If do, I can directly share my progress with you
But if you don’t have the answer, due to the restriction of server rule, I can’t provide you with my complete progress
Based on the rules, the only thing I can do as a helper is to guide people 🥲
Sure
Answer is 7
Oh, then we can discuss it here
Lemme rearrange my progress since they look messy atm
Question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @indigo charm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone verify that my answer to this problem is correct?
,w [[0, 1, 2], [5, 0, 0], [0, 2, 4]]^2 * [[0], [4], [1]]
Believe so 
@still rune Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @still rune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Using the Laplace transform, solve the system of differential equations.
x'(t)-4y(t)=-8cos(4t)
y'(t)+3x(t)=-9sin(4t)
x(0)=0,y(0)=3
After transforming to:
sX(s)-x(0)-4Y(s)=-8s/(s^2+4^2)
sY(s)-y(0)+3X(s)=-94/(s^2+4^2)
I cannot get X(s) and Y(s) that I can inverse Laplace transform. Thanks in advance!
note that the system you have after the transformation is a linear system
so oyu may even use cramer method or any other school method
to get X and Y
which are images of lapalces originals
when you get X and Y then you inverse transform with tables
that is all
I am aware, and tried plenty of times to get an answer that can be inverse transformed using the taught formulas
so wh you worry ?
Since I can't get an answer that is inverse transformable, I can't find the x(t) and y(t)
you got X(s) and Y(s) before inverse ? can you show it on paper or not ?
,rccw
Any way I try to solve for X or Y, I cannot get anything that is transformable
I can, also, add the relevant formulas I have been given.
yes you can reach Y(s) from second
and plg in first equation
but better for your teache r to see
wud be if you use
cramer
method
unless you re really fluent in classical methods
of solvign systems
There are the relevant formulas. I tried solving for either X or Y and plugging it in the other equation plenty of times but to no avail
While I wait for help, I'll look into the Cramer method
fidn cramer please
it is not true
assumign you got correct answrs
then
you must take X(s) and Y(s)
and
apply partial fractiosn decomposition
and then you get X and Y in a way that you wull be able to use tables of L
partial fraction decompotions
your system of diff equaitons is not difficut, it is onyl time consuming little bit you must be aptient
patient*
i help you here, i take
your X(s) answer
and i show you :
but i assume, you got it right
2 minutes plz
I am getting somewhere. With partial decomposition I think I am getting proper results
You've been a ton of help already! 😁
After completing calculations of partial decomposition and using the inverse Laplace transform formulas, I got
x(t)=144-38sin(4t)
y(t)=36-36cos(4t)
This sounds quite reasonable. I think it's correct. thanks!
.close
Closed by @limpid tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why does the square root of x * square root of x = x?
just never seen it before and it got me a little confused
$sqroot(a)* sqroot(a) = a$
swerriee
ohh
that's just how the square root works
the root gets cancelled out
you're squaring the square root
suppose sqroot6*sq root 6
it would be sqroot 36 which is basically 6
that's where it's derived from
ok i get it now
sorry if that sounded stupid, its 11pm and im burnt out lol
ty guys
.close
Closed by @round saddle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey. So they ask for the velocity at time t. Did you find the velocity function v(t)?
yes i have found it
i can show my work if you want
Sure. And also I'm thinking, when they ask for the velocity at time t, you get just a number. Did you use some specific value for t?
values?
Yeah, how do you get -95? I would expect something that depends on t.
yes
But they ask for the velocity at a general time t, not at t = 10.
Can you enter -t^2/2-4t-5?
they did mention Find the velocity (in m/s) of the particle at time t
.
tho
so like number tho?
Yeah, but they never said what t is.
From my point of view, it could be any point between 0 and 10.
This is why I am thinking that they are just asking for the general expression for the velocity. So like put in
-0.5t^2-4t-5
in that field might work.
This is the velocity at time t.
By the way, it must be a mistake that they write "meters" here.
It should be meters per second.
@lament schooner Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Bro the question is really good whoever replies to your solution just ping me once please
jee?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
oof,yeah
isnt it
honestly i dont think many cannot do this question
although i had one guy do it but he used some Real Analysis book, bruh
ig few can do it
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
I think its A
honestly its just a matter of being able to visualize it
but also you cant have a U shape of connected pieces like the one in D
Yup i cant
so D?
tysm
yes
.close
Closed by @vague owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Apologies for the silly question but
Q should be (-b,-a) right?
I thought it would be the reflection in the line y = -x
The red is xy = 1 and blue is x^2 - y^2 = 2
Apologies for the pink that was for a different part of the question
The green is meant to represent the lines y = x and y = -x
under your assumption of reflection over y=-x, you're actually getting the black point
oh?
what's going on here is actually rotational symmetry around the origin
Yes
Closed by @copper dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yep
Closed by @cunning roost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how am i supposed to solve dis
Wait why does that make sense tho
Setting the slope of the horizontal x point to equal 0
Yes
the same way for y=mx+b we say the slope is m for all x because y’=m
for functions that aren’t linear the slope changes so it’s a function of x
ok so im just making slope = 0 and that tells me the point where the slope is 0
yes
ohh ok that makes sense now
A hiking trail is 20 kilometers long. Park organizers want to build 5 rest stops for hikers with one on each end of the trail and the other 3 spaces evenly between. How much distance will separate successful rest stops?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
did u get x=-1/3 and x=1
for me?
Im still doing it
yes i got tha
@misty crest
so to find the y value
do i plug it into the derivative or original funciton
?
the original function
why tho
the original function models the y value
the derivative function models the slope
which was useful for finding the x coordinates of the max/min
but we know the function of x to find the y value
so we can use that x value to find the y value
lol💀
Ill pay u in pennies
nono this is complimentary
volunteer work
i get bored
so nice
my life is so fun right
evrytime i help someone w math i end up getting humbled
😹😹😹
maybe u could be a teacher which is actual fun
no that sounds awful
😭 ?
i help other students
in my study halls
and classes in general
but i’d never want to have to teach a whole class
are u math major?
Why not
i’m in high school
senior
gonna be a math major tho
wtf so am i
math and physics
i read math books yea
i read a bunch of books
don’t compare urself to me
For talking about intelligence points
strange
Intelligence quotient
yea everyone has their strengths
Thats so true
I can draw really good
see
Ig that makes up for it
you’d be considered a genius relative to me
not rly its not like i can be an art major in this economy
😭
good thing u studied something that will acc make money
no one can be an art major in this economy lol
yup🤌🏻🤌🏻
Its ok im doing stem
i’ve always loved it tho
ever since i was a kid
doing mental math for fun
shower math
every time i do mental math i get humbled so fast
was that kid that refused to count on my fingers
i did 39 - 48
goat at those multiplication tables those worksheets in a minute
and i confidently thought it was 7
close enough
I have a test tomorrow
calc?
Yes wanna see my topics
Ik and my teacher is 6'7 not kidding
teacher gave the whole test
guy cares about class average huh
but ive had him for 3 semesters
he adds shit on the test that was never on the homework
💔
like what does it say?
the equation of the tangent line
just use point slope
y-y1=m(x-x1)
another derivative question using the power rule? find a point with a particular slope, find the equation of a tangent line, questions like those parabola questions, maybe something else
where m=f’(a)
yea ik
Or can i just do y = mx + b and plug in the points
i thoiyht u were asking
wait fr?
because the slope is found using the derivative
you’ll only have one point because the tangent line is always changing
you’ll have the tangent line to the curve at some point (x1,y1)
and have to find the slope
then use point slope form
ohh ok
to find the general equation
no basketball in canada
waste of potential
💀
6’7 and not a pro athlete is criminal
bro he played hockey infront of us and he fell twice
I told him beforehand i would cheer for him
that shit is so embarrassin
😭
typical math teacher
parents must’ve been crying when he didn’t come out a d1 athlete
embarrassing how instead of cheering i screamed
LMAO
yo
I want to make jokes ab it
can you guys help me rq
jason todd
lolll
with
just got doxxed
broooo
Nathan Drake 21
i didnt even do anyhting
y send a link?
Send it in screenshot form instead
bro just send a picture
Bro wtf get your own channel im struggling over here too
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Oh wait this is easy
essentially
try this y=arctan(sin(e^x)) at x=pi/3
u sure?
i got it
wtf
e^1+ln3
Oh ok yea im not that far into the unit
i’m doing this in my head btw
ahh i was close
i forgot to take the reciprocal
when doing ^-3/4
i just did to the 3/4
why the hell did he do y = mx + b here
lucky
parallel means same slope
so the slope was -1/16
just subtract over x
and divide by 16
then doing the derivative u notice the 3 cancels
OHH UR RIGHT
-x^-4/3=-1/16
damn i can’t believe i forgot to do the reciprocal
i raise both sides in my head to the 3/4
those damn negatives
fun practice is integrating in ur head
yep nope
Me neither
I do anything to avoid it
what the fuck
he set the derivative to the slope
yes
OH
because the derivative is the slope
but the linear function they gave
was some random one
totally unrelated
ohh
im confused
if x^-4/3
becomes a reciprocal
dont u get rid of the - ?
bruh
nvm
x^-4/3
they did
excuse my mental math but how is x^4/3 = 16
haha i get it batmin
x^-4/3=1/16
so take the reciprocal
because ^-4/3 is just 1/x^4/3
or cross multiply if u see it better that way
ohh
i dont understand the cross multiplication
tbh forget ab it prob not gonna be on the test anyways right 😓