#help-27

1 messages · Page 153 of 1

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @subtle kindle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cyan axle
#

How does the equation for a derivative change when I’m trying to find the second or third deravative?

cyan axle
#

Like using power rule as an example

#

X^2= 2X

#

So what changes when I’m looking for the second or third derivative

quick peak
cyan axle
#

Like how do I find the second derivative

#

How does my formula change

quick peak
#

it's the same

supple knot
cyan axle
#

How do I do that?

#

2X but that’s 0

supple knot
cyan axle
#

How does it work then?

supple knot
#

And constant multiple rule

#

,tex .diff rules

cyan axle
#

There is no power though

woven radishBOT
#

dr. matlab plot

supple knot
cyan axle
#

2X?

supple knot
#

x = x^1

cyan axle
#

=x

#

So just x

#

It’ll just end up as 2(x)

supple knot
#

x = x yes

cyan axle
#

yes

supple knot
cyan axle
#

Yeah

#

But what next

supple knot
#

What are you confused about

cyan axle
#

What I’m suppose to do next

supple knot
#

Do next for what

cyan axle
#

There’s no slope of a straight line so idk what to do next to find the second derivative

supple knot
supple knot
cyan axle
#

nx^n-1

supple knot
cyan axle
#

So 2X

#

No that dosent work

#

Can I even apply the power rule

#

2x^1.

#

2x^1-1

#

Still 2X

supple knot
#

1-1 = 0

cyan axle
#

Yeah

#

So it’s gone

supple knot
#

x^0 = ?

cyan axle
#

X

supple knot
#

No

#

x^1 = x

cyan axle
#

So 0

supple knot
#

No

#

,calc 3^0

woven radishBOT
#

Result:

1
cyan axle
#

Okay

#

But ^1 is still 1*

supple knot
cyan axle
#

Mb it’s 1

supple knot
#

x^1 = x

cyan axle
#

But I can just ignore it then

#

Yeah

#

Still x

supple knot
cyan axle
#

1

supple knot
#

Yes

cyan axle
#

2x^1-1

#

2x^1

#

But I can ignore the ^1

#

Still 2X

supple knot
cyan axle
#

Dammit

#

I’m coming off working on physics for like 8 hours cut me some slack

#

2x

#

Bro it’s still 2X

supple knot
supple knot
cyan axle
#

Yes I know addition

#

Hopefully

#

So you want me to say 2x^0

supple knot
cyan axle
#

Chill

#

Shush

supple knot
cyan axle
#

Lapse of judgement

supple knot
#

Am I being mean to you

cyan axle
#

No

#

Okay to find the second derivative of x^2 I need the first derivative

#

2x

#

And the second derivative is getting the derivative of that

#

So it’s like

#

F(2)=x^2 ?

#

Shiiii…..

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @cyan axle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

graceful ore
#

HELPPPPPPP

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

graceful ore
#

NO

#

BRO I TYPO

#

LOOK at channel 30

#

🙏

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pallid ravine
#

did i do this right?? im doing a circuit and i dont see my answer choice anywhere so can anyone tell me what i did wrong?

wicked edge
#

the slope of the tangent line at c is $$\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}$$, not c

woven radishBOT
#

Cycadellic

wicked edge
#

so, now that we know $f'(c)$, we need to find c

woven radishBOT
#

Cycadellic

wicked edge
#

just find the derivative of f and set it equal to -1.3...

#

then, the solution which is in [-3,-1] is c

wicked edge
pallid ravine
#

why set to -1.333?

#

Arent the end points the two um points i use to find the slope of the secant line

#

I thought its -2? No?

#

And set equal to f’(x) given?

#

@wicked edge

wicked edge
#

ill be more concrete

#

we know $$f'(c)=\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}, c\in[a,b]$$ and $$f'(x)=\frac{-3-x^2}{x^2}$$

woven radishBOT
#

Cycadellic

pallid ravine
#

yes

wicked edge
#

you found $$f'(c)=\frac{f(-3)-f(1)}{-3--1}=-1.33...$$

woven radishBOT
#

Cycadellic

wicked edge
#

therefore, $$f'(c)=-1.33...$$

woven radishBOT
#

Cycadellic

wicked edge
#

but, we know f'

#

so, $$\frac{-3-c^2}{c^2}=-1.3...$$

woven radishBOT
#

Cycadellic

pallid ravine
#

But f(-3) is 2?

#

and f(-1) is -2?

wicked edge
#

remember that we are given $$f'(x)=\frac{-3-x^2}{x^2}$$

woven radishBOT
#

Cycadellic

wicked edge
#

therefore,
$$f'(c)=\frac{-3-c^2}{c^2}$$

woven radishBOT
#

Cycadellic

wicked edge
#

but, by the mean value theorem, $$f'(c)=\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}=-1.33...$$

woven radishBOT
#

Cycadellic

wicked edge
#

so, i have shown to you that
$$\frac{-3-c^2}{c^2}=f'(c)=-1.33...$$
then, it must follow that
$$\frac{-3-c^2}{c^2}=-1.33...$$

woven radishBOT
#

Cycadellic

wicked edge
#

make sense?

#

i can type it more clearly if you need

pallid ravine
#

No ❌ wait its not saying the answer is -4/3 tho

#

thats like the answer to the previous quesrion

#

answer to #7 that brought me there

wicked edge
#

oh man

#

my bad

pallid ravine
#

ur good

wicked edge
#

not sure what that was about

pallid ravine
#

i mustve fucked up then cuz i think the closest answer is - root 3, but it leads me back to the beginning so i messed up somewhere else

#

😣

wicked edge
#

you messed up on the last step

pallid ravine
#

what is wrong there?

wicked edge
#

arithmetic mistake

pallid ravine
#

oh

wicked edge
#

f'(-1.33...)=-2.6875, not -2

pallid ravine
#

so whats c

wicked edge
#

so, i agree that

#

with x=c

pallid ravine
#

Yes

wicked edge
#

so, multiply both sides by x^2, and simplify, make quadratic and find the root

#

and dont forget $\pm$

woven radishBOT
#

Cycadellic

pallid ravine
#

ohh

#

+/- root 3?

wicked edge
#

good so far

pallid ravine
#

but poditive isnt in interval

wicked edge
#

right

pallid ravine
#

so just - root 3

wicked edge
#

and since we know a quadratic only has two roots, youre done

pallid ravine
#

got it

#

ok thank u sm

wicked edge
#

np

pallid ravine
#

it brings me back to #1 so i have to check my work previously idk what else i got wrong but now i get

#

God bless

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @pallid ravine

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

placid verge
devout snowBOT
placid verge
#

I am not sure if I did this right

crystal drift
#

check your c

#

and e/f

#

and i

crystal drift
crystal drift
crystal drift
placid verge
#

do i switch e and f

crystal drift
#

yup

placid verge
#

i would be undefined?

crystal drift
#

yup

placid verge
#

is c 1

crystal drift
#

that's also right

placid verge
#

thanks

crystal drift
#

np

placid verge
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @placid verge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

analog hamlet
#

How do you find axis of symetry from vertex form?

charred sleet
#

it’s symmetrical about the x coordinate of the parabola

analog hamlet
#

Like how do I find it from this equation??

#

Does the question I am asking make sense?

unique spire
#

$a * (x-h)^2 +k $ where (h ; k) it the coordinate of the point of interest

#

goddammit

analog hamlet
#

So would (1,3) be my vertex?

#

Or (-1,3)

unique spire
#

h=-1

analog hamlet
#

Ohhh I see

#

So would I plug in -1 into the function to get my y int?

unique spire
#

this is how it looks

analog hamlet
#

Sweet, thanks

unique spire
#

since a is negative, there's a max
if a was positive there would be a minimum

analog hamlet
#

Yeah that makes sense

unique spire
#

to find the zeros of a function, solve $0 = a * (x-h)^2 + k$

woven radishBOT
analog hamlet
#

3?

unique spire
#

the zeros would be $x=(-1)\pm \sqrt{3}$

woven radishBOT
analog hamlet
#

Ohhhhhh, I see

#

So what would be my y int?

unique spire
#

what do you mean by y int?

analog hamlet
#

Y intercept

unique spire
#

it you're talking about the y intercepting the x axis then it the zeros of a fonctions

#

where simplified :$h\pm \sqrt{\frac{-k}{a}}=x$

woven radishBOT
analog hamlet
#

I'm a little stuck on finding the y intercept now

unique spire
#

i think by axis of symetry: they want the value of h
by vertex : they want the value of k
by y-intercept : they want the value of x where y=0, so the zeros of the function

analog hamlet
#

My zeros are -1 and 3

#

Do I just add them?

#

Y intercept = 2

unique spire
#

you sure about that?

#

y=-(3+1)^2+3=-4^2+3=-16+3=-13 not y is not equal 0 at x=3

#

$y=a(x-h)^2+k\
0=a(x-h)^2+k\
-k=a(x-h)^2\
\frac{-k}{a}=(x-h)^2\
\pm \sqrt{\frac{-k}{a}}=\sqrt{(x-h)^2}\
\pm \sqrt{\frac{-k}{a}}=x-h\
h\pm \sqrt{\frac{-k}{a}}=x\$

woven radishBOT
analog hamlet
#

Are you sure it isn't 2? The line intercepts the y axis at positive 2

#

In the graph you showed me as well

unique spire
#

oh if you want where f(x) intercept the y axis then solve $y=a(0-h)^2 +k$

woven radishBOT
analog hamlet
#

Oh perfect

#

Thank you very much!

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @analog hamlet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sweet veldt
devout snowBOT
sweet veldt
#

how to get from the letting w= line to the last line

#

i understand the rest

oblique gale
woven radishBOT
#

qbibubi

sweet veldt
#

room is occupied

oblique gale
#

Oh I'm sorry didn't notice!

sweet veldt
#

also for this one

#

actually nvm i get how to solve this but im still a bit confused on the last part after doing the substituion with s= in this case or w= in the initial question

#

like how to go from that step to the final particular solution

#

<@&286206848099549185>

sweet veldt
#

from the characteristic line, bx - ay

#

in what way am i plugging that in after doing the subtition with w to get the final particular solution

#

is it litearlly just plugging it into w?

#

wait

woven radishBOT
sweet veldt
#

did i do this right

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sweet veldt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fallen mason
#

I need help regarding problems b-d on this homework problem. I think a is correct ( I got 6 Ohms for my equivalent resistor) but my professor didnt explain divider rules so well.

devout snowBOT
#

@fallen mason Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@fallen mason Has your question been resolved?

fallen mason
#

Or are they all in series with each other?

devout snowBOT
#

@fallen mason Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

orchid leaf
#

If $Y = \emptyset$ but $X \neq \emptyset$, then there are no functions from $X$ to $Y$.
If $A \times B$ and every element of $A$ is related to no elements of $B$, then $R$ is the empty set.

woven radishBOT
#

Forsaken

orchid leaf
#

Are there no functions of this sort because of the definition of a function? While a relation can have the second set empty and exist as the empty relation?

stone stump
#

well for a function you need that every element x in X appears in some pair (x,y)

#

for a relation you dont need that

orchid leaf
#

That is what I mean

#

Is it necessary though that every element x is related to some y? I have seen some definitions of function as necessitating only that there is at most one element from the second set. So there can be none?

stone stump
#

well in that case I wouldnt call it a function. a partial function perhaps

orchid leaf
#

I see so for it to be a total function it can't be at most one but exactly one

stone stump
#

yes

orchid leaf
#

thanks

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @orchid leaf

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cosmic gust
#

Find all triples (a, b, c) such that:\
$a,b,c \in \mathbb{Z^+}$\
$a^3 + b^3 + c^3 = (abc)^2

woven radishBOT
#

Oğuzhan
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

cosmic gust
#

How can I solve this?

long sundial
#

Is this for a particular course or competition maths?

kind prairie
#

.

cosmic gust
long sundial
#

If it's for a particular course there might be a taught method to solve in which case I'm no help.

Otherwise I'd test some low numbers and try get an idea on what works and breaks. Usually gives an idea for the proof

cosmic gust
#

Hmm okay

long sundial
#

For instance if a=0 you know b=0 and c,=0

cosmic gust
#

No it's positive integers

long sundial
#

Then for a=1 what solutions exist (if any)?

cosmic gust
#

Ask it somewhere else, this is not the appropriate place to ask

#

And I don't think you are allowed to do that

long sundial
#

<@&268886789983436800>

devout snowBOT
#

@cosmic gust Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rotund tundra
#

In the definition of existence,
f is a function defined on a deleted neighborhood of x0.
I don’t get why does it have to be a deleted neighborhood,
what does that mean
And why f can be defined on a neighborhood including X0

rancid grove
#

existence of what?

devout snowBOT
#

@rotund tundra Has your question been resolved?

rotund tundra
rancid grove
#

okay. the definition says that it CAN just be defined on a deleted neighborhood

#

being defined at x0 is not a requirement for a limit to exist

#

sure it can, but it does not have to

rotund tundra
#

Oh so I understood it wrong, Thanks.
I thought that it has to meet the requirement of being in a deleted neighborhood.

But can I use the definition if I am not referring to necessarily a deleted neighborhood?
Even tho that’s the definition’s assumption?

rancid grove
#

yes!

rotund tundra
#

How come?

#

Just asking to specify that in my answer so there will not be holes in my proof

rancid grove
#

you can just remove x0 on the neighborhood you consider

#

consider the deleted neighborhood U around x0 for which f is defined

#

so now you have the requirement for the existence of an accumulation point

#

also because with limit, you do not care about what happens AT the exact point but what happens as you approach it. so the numbers around are more important than the number itself

hollow elk
#

Need help

rotund tundra
rancid grove
rancid grove
#

i do not get this though. what are you trying to prove??

rotund tundra
#

I disproved:
if for every g:R->R the limit of [f(x)g(x)] at x->x0 exist
Then the limit of f(x) in x->x0 is 0

#

With a counter example

rancid grove
#

does the limit of g have to exist?

#

is that an assumption?

rotund tundra
#

Technically according to the assumption yes

rotund tundra
rancid grove
#

hmm weird statement but okay i think what you showed might be correct.

#

did you mean that you proved that the individual limits exist?

#

that’s what you have on the first part here?

rotund tundra
#

You don’t think I need to show or state that I assume something that isn’t exactly based on the definition?

rotund tundra
rancid grove
#

ohhh the first half is incorrect

#

just because the limit of the product exists, the individual limit does is incorrect

#

can you show me the full statement of what you’re proving?

rotund tundra
#

Then the something has to exist

rancid grove
#

you dont know if the limit of f even exists

#

it doesnt say that limit of f exists

#

there are a lot of counterexamples for your problem. you can even go as far as neither limit of f nor g exists.

rotund tundra
#

But we have that the multiplication of both exists

rancid grove
#

yes that can happen

rotund tundra
#

Is that possible that
(Doesn’t exist) * (doesn’t exist) = exist?

rancid grove
#

yes

rotund tundra
#

Crazy
Just saw that
Exist / DNE = DNE

rancid grove
#

limits are weird

#

for your problem, no need to prove anything. just write a counterexample

rotund tundra
#

So if I assume f and g doesn’t have a limit
Then that’s a straight counter example since
Since When saying lim f(x) = 0 the lim is existence which is 0

rancid grove
#

yes

rotund tundra
#

Ok thank you so much
Wouldn’t have realized idk how multiplication between works even without u

rancid grove
#

lmao you are welcome! 👌

rotund tundra
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @rotund tundra

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

winged parcel
#

How do I solve this? 1,(2) being 1,2222222222... and the answer is 5/18, I just need to understand how to get this result

worn galleon
#

The fraction 1/9 has a satisfiying form as a decimal
You can use that to help you out

winged parcel
worn galleon
#

Well you want to find 1.222222222..., preferably as a fraction so you can evaluate it with the other fraction

And you know how to write 0.222222222... in fractional form now
And you also know how to write 1 as a fraction
And you can add fractions together
The rest I think you can do from there

winged parcel
#

Ah alright I got it now

#

thanks 👍

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @winged parcel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

meager river
#

i Have an algebra question

devout snowBOT
meager river
#

I am just a high school student, but this question stumped me. I even tried looking it up and i still have no solution.

#

The question is "Find the equation passing (1,-3) and perpendicular to 4y + 2x = 1

mighty knoll
#

Have you tried anything?

meager river
#

The thing that stumped me was i have to type it in y=mx+b form but m and b have to be integers

#

I was getting 0.5x - 3.5

mighty knoll
#

m and b don‘t have to be integers unless your question states so

meager river
#

it does

mighty knoll
#

Well then it would be useful to post the whole question

meager river
#

yeah one sec

winter patrol
#

how did you get 0.5 for the slope
it doesn't seem you identified the slope and/or applied properties of perpendicular lines correctly

arctic temple
#

also there can only be one line passing through 2 distinct points

meager river
#

finally figured out how to use macs picture editor lol

meager river
#

it worked

winter patrol
#

not sure what you're looking at but
y = 0.5x - 3.5
won't be
and doesn't look perpendicular to 4y + 2x = 1

meager river
winter patrol
#

you should be able to see that the angle between those lines isn't 90°

winter patrol
#

first identify the slope of:

4y + 2x = 1

meager river
#

just 2 right?

winter patrol
#

no

#

how are you getting 2

meager river
#

-2?

winter patrol
#

how?

#

please show me how you're reaching that value

meager river
#

rise/run

winter patrol
#

otherwise i'm going to assume its a guess esp if its wrong

meager river
#

you go down 1 and over 2 so 2/1

winter patrol
#

that's not how rise/run works

#

you're treating down as +ve,
and doing stuff like run/|rise|

meager river
#

so what should i do instead

winter patrol
#

use proper signs

#

do rise/run

#

up is positive, down is negative

#

you go down 1
the "rise" of the given line will be -1

glossy dew
#

That's a hint

winter patrol
#

over 2
run will be 2

meager river
#

yes. -1/2 right?

winter patrol
#

yes. the slope of the given line will be -1/2

#

and the apply properties of slopes of perpendiclar lines to get the slope of the desired line

glossy dew
#

Youd get -x/2 = -1

#

if x is the unknown slope

winter patrol
#

shouldn't use x for slope here

#

bad to use the same variable to represent multiple things

meager river
#

but my slope has to be an integer.

winter patrol
#

yes and it will be

#

do you know the relation between slopes of perpendicular lines?

meager river
#

so the slope of the first one was 2x so, the negative reciprocal would be -1/2. Now i do not know how to make that a whole number.

winter patrol
#

firstly slope shouldn't contain x

meager river
#

ok

winter patrol
#

secondly we just established that the slope of the given line is actually -1/2

meager river
#

yes.

glossy dew
#

should've used m

winter patrol
#

and you literally just mentioned the relation between the slopes of perpendicular lines

#

the negative reciprocal

glossy dew
#

Yeah

winter patrol
#

the slope of

4y + 2x = 1
is -1/2

#

what's the negative reciprocal of -1/2

meager river
#

2?

glossy dew
#

Yep

#

now substitute that in the slope intercept form

#

y = mx + b

meager river
#

y = 2x + ?

glossy dew
#

Yeah we can still keep it as b

#

We'll find out what it is

meager river
#

ok

glossy dew
#

Now the question says it passes through a point right?

#

(1, -3)

#

So that point must be a solution of the line equation that we are trying to find

meager river
#

-5?

glossy dew
#

Wait I'll check

#

Yes, you are right

#

y = 2x - 5

#

That's the answer

meager river
#

YES!

#

thank you!!!!!!!

glossy dew
#

Now you can close the channel using .close

meager river
#

.close

glossy dew
#

So that someone else can use it

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @meager river

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

still dawn
#

for this question, how do you know what to u-sub? i was thinking of doing sinx for my u-sub but the solutions said u-sub was cosx

misty crest
#

well notice that cosx is in the denominator so letting u=sinx wont cancel it

#

if we let u=cosx then du=-sinxdx

#

so one of the sinx cancels

#

and were left with -sin^2x/u du

#

but

#

sin^2x can be rewritten in terms of u

#

which is cosx

#

@still dawn

#

does this make sense

still dawn
#

so i guess u kinda have to think ahead when u choose ur u-subs?

misty crest
#

yea

#

so sin^2x=1-cos^2x

still dawn
#

right right

misty crest
#

=1-u^2

#

but there’s a negative so

#

it’s really u^2-1

#

so (u^2-1)/u

#

=u-1/u

#

integrate this

stuck field
#

I think u = cos(x) was enough help already, don't solve it knief.

misty crest
#

he knew u=cosx already

stuck field
#

Then sin^2(x) can be written in terms of u is probably enough.

misty crest
#

he wasn’t responding

still dawn
#

i already did the question

#

i was just wondering how u go about choosing the proper u

misty crest
#

ok

still dawn
#

ty though

stuck field
#

Preferably you want the terms in your integral can all be broken down into something simpler, an integral that you can do much more easily. And much of the terms should really be just something like "du" when you're choosing u. In this case, when you did u = cos(x) you were able use sin(x) = du and rest all too was easy to write in terms of u.

devout snowBOT
#

@still dawn Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

restive river
#

hi can someone help me solve this using log

restive river
#

like ik it should be log(base 4)16√128 but how do i further solve

winter torrent
#

often with these it's helpful to prime factorize EVERYTHING

#

and reduce that square root

devout snowBOT
#

@restive river Has your question been resolved?

restive river
#

It doesn't necessarily need log but you can use it I guess

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hot steppe
devout snowBOT
hot steppe
#

can someone help

stuck field
#

write it as exp( ... )

restive river
#

are you allowed to use taylor series and/or L'hopital

hot steppe
#

l'hopital

#

my friend solved it but i have no clue why he solved it the way he did

#

he basically just put e^ln(sin^2(2x))/ln(3x)

#

and then he replaced x with 0 but i know that part i just don't know where he got the "e" from

#

@restive river

devout snowBOT
#

@hot steppe Has your question been resolved?

woven radishBOT
#

themadchessplayer

hot steppe
#

I don't get it

#

why is there a L there

unkempt narwhal
#

L is what we want to calculate.

woven radishBOT
#

themadchessplayer

hot steppe
#

would it be possible to explain this with the limit i sent here since that would be easier

#

@unkempt narwhal

hot steppe
#

omg thank you very much i understand it now

crisp niche
#

yvw

hot steppe
#

but wait

#

what if a<0

crisp niche
#

it is not possible if you compute limits of your form

#

the base of the power, must be positive

#

the function is called: power-exponential real function, that exists only if the base of the power is positive > 0

hot steppe
#

ok again thank you so much the a^b=e^blna helped a ton

crisp niche
#

smiles

hot steppe
#

is that a rule or something?

crisp niche
#

it is the basic formula, which is direct form from the logarithm definition, it is being taught in every course, where one is taught the logarithms

hot steppe
#

so do i use it only when ln is a power of something?

crisp niche
#

you should formulate your question in different way: you should ask, when you may use it, and the answer is:

#

if you have an expression of the form [ f ( x ) ] ^ g(x)

#

when you calculate:

#

limits

#

or

#

derivatives

hot steppe
#

so even if it was sin(2x)^cos(x) and then i would have been e^cos(x)*ln(sin(2x)

crisp niche
crisp niche
#

please write this formula in your exercise book, to not lose it in the future

hot steppe
#

ok thank you so very much

crisp niche
#

🙂

hot steppe
#

@crisp niche you still here?

crisp niche
hot steppe
#

lim x->infinity

#

that part

crisp niche
hot steppe
#

ok

crisp niche
#

the result is , surely, 0, but you should write it better, i show you the correct style:

hot steppe
#

it wasnt me

#

i wanted to ask

#

why did they remove 16

crisp niche
#

that is elementary, methodological, solution

hot steppe
#

why did you add an extra x^2 and then put 16/x^2-1

real pewter
#

he factored x^2 out

#

basically divided evry term by the highest power of x

crisp niche
real pewter
#

allows you to notice how the functoin behaves asymptotically as x tends to infinity

real pewter
# hot steppe why did you add an extra x^2 and then put 16/x^2-1

you basically divide every term by the highest power of x (x^2 in this case). that either reduces every x term to a constant or a term like a/x^n which would tend to 0 as x tends to infinity, and the constants would not vary. this way you can calculate the limit easily

hot steppe
#

ohhhhhh

#

so we divided x with x^2 and 16 with x^2

#

but why -1

real pewter
#

there are other ways to approach this, for example if the denominator and numerator are both polynomials, theres 3 cases:

  1. numerator has the highest power of x, meaning the function diverges
  2. denominator has the highest power of x, meaning the function goes to 0
  3. the numerator and denominator have the same order of x, meaning the function tends to the numerators coefficient of that power of x over the denominators coefficient of that powrer of x. (example: (3x^2+x)/(2x^2+1) considering only the highest power of x coefficients, we get 3/2 which is the limit as x goes to infinity. the sign would vary if x goes to negative infinity only if the power of x is odd
real pewter
#

an easy trick (dont think this is how it works, this is only a short cut) is to only consider the highest powers of x on the numerator and demoniator

hot steppe
#

wouldn't 16-x^2/x^2 be the same?

real pewter
#

in this case, you get x/x^2 which is 1/x. "substitue" infinity, and it becomes 0, which si the limit. if you got something like x^2/x it would = x. sub infinity and you get infinity, which is the limit, meaning it diverges. if you had 3x^2/2x^2 you get 3/2, which is the limit

real pewter
hot steppe
#

so you can't divide the highest powers of x with each other?

real pewter
#

so if you divide by x^2 you get (16/x^2 -1)/(1)
limit of 16/x^2 as x -> inf is 0, the limit of -1 and 1 is just -1 and 1 so the function goes to -1/1 which is -1

real pewter
real pewter
#

in this case, he just factored out x^2 which yields the same result

#

induvidually dividing x, x^2 and 16 by x^2 yields the same result

crisp niche
#

to make it look more elegant )

real pewter
#

when you have only constants and terms like a/x^n finding the limits is simple, because constants dont vary, and a/x^n always goes to 0 as x goes to infinity

#

and dividing by the highest power of x leaves you with only constants and terms in the form a/x^n

hot steppe
#

im so sorry because i might sound dumb right now but is x/16-x^2=x/x^2(16/x^2)=x/16

real pewter
#

did you factor x^2 out or divide all the terms by x^2?

hot steppe
#

wait

real pewter
#

also dont be sorry, its allg

#

math is a bitch

hot steppe
#

it really is

hot steppe
#

ok this is better

crisp niche
#

but the other photo of mine looks better, hence i used previous wway, to make it look nicer

#

becasue it is how we write books

hot steppe
#

ok i understand it now

crisp niche
#

eng is notmy native one, though )

hot steppe
#

and why do we do this

#

like the whole thing

real pewter
# hot steppe and why do we do this

it reduced every term to either a constant, or a term in the form a/x^n
then you consider the effect of the limit on each term
if its a constant, say a
as x -> inf, a is just a
if its a/x^n, as -> inf, a/x^n goes to 0
that way you can eaisly calculate the limit

#

notice here how shes calculated the limit for each term

hot steppe
#

nono i meant why we found 0 for

real pewter
#

ohh

#

well do you mean the application of limits in the real world? or

hot steppe
#

no i mean what do we need this in the problem i showed earlier

hot steppe
crisp niche
real pewter
#

does your question require you to draw a graph?
either way, the limit is simply a property of the function

hot steppe
#

yes

real pewter
#

graphically its an asymptote yes

#

you will see the graph tend to y = 0 (the x axis)

#

you see, the graph tends towards the axis

#

asymptotes become very important when sketching

hot steppe
#

wait

#

what if it wasn't 0

real pewter
#

heres one that tends to x = 1

hot steppe
#

ohhhh

real pewter
#

and heres one that diverges

#

it actually has an oblique asymptote, see how it approaches being a straight line

hot steppe
#

ok

#

now

real pewter
#

it would approach a line y=mx+b which you can calculate

#

some just shoot off to infinty

#

like the x asymptote

hot steppe
real pewter
#

the derivative of y

#

the function you have is in the form f(x)/g(x) meaning youd use the quotient rule to differentiate it and find its derivative

hot steppe
#

wouldnt derivative of y be -2x

real pewter
hot steppe
#

oh nvm

real pewter
#

there

hot steppe
#

nono nvm

real pewter
#

easier to see

hot steppe
#

yeah

real pewter
#

does that make sense?

hot steppe
#

yes

real pewter
#

cool

hot steppe
#

so why would the derivate of y equal to that

#

the one the person in the photo has equalled it to

real pewter
hot steppe
real pewter
#

your function is in the form f(x)/g(x)

hot steppe
#

did they continue using that

#

?

real pewter
#

f(x) = x and g(x) = 16-x^2

hot steppe
#

yes i know

real pewter
#

so when you use the chain rule formula

hot steppe
#

but they continued using that rule

real pewter
real pewter
hot steppe
real pewter
#

this is the chain rule substitution

hot steppe
#

ok i got this part

hot steppe
real pewter
#

numerator becomes 16 - x^2 + 2x^2 which = 16 + x^2

#

so the numerator is 16+x^2

real pewter
real pewter
#

simplified

#

they simplified the numerator

#

by expanding the brackets

hot steppe
#

yeah so they simplified the chain rule part

real pewter
#

yeah

hot steppe
#

ok

#

would you please tell me how did he simplify it

devout snowBOT
#

@hot steppe Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stark coral
#

I’ve been at it for probably over 30 mins and I still can’t prove this

worn galleon
#

What have you done so far?

stark shuttle
#

!status

devout snowBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
stark shuttle
#

!show

devout snowBOT
#

Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.

stark coral
#

but its still confusing

#

1 sec

#

I don’t understand why we have to use the binomial square formula on the numerator but the difference of 2 squares on the denominator, but if I used diff of 2 squares on the numerator and on the denominator, it wouldn’t work, even though it’s the same thing?

#

The numerator and denominator could cancel out to 1 if I used difference of 2 squares on both the numerator and the denominator

#

Yet it also (1-cosx)/(1+cosx)?

devout snowBOT
#

@stark coral Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

restive river
#

does anyone know of other shorthand notations for the trig functions?

restive river
#

feynman came up with these but i want a notation for doing antiderivatives fast, and these are easy to mistake for eachother

supple knot
#

Whatever it is, it's nonstandard and you'd be the only one in your class to use them

devout snowBOT
#

@restive river Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jolly sierra
#

hi

devout snowBOT
jolly sierra
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @jolly sierra

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

strange fractal
#

Hi

devout snowBOT
strange fractal
#

On the right side of the equation you can see the a^(n+1) and - b^(n+1). Did they come about because v=n was used for a in the first sum and 0 was used for b in the second sum?

timber pebble
#

sorry, which step are you confused about?

strange fractal
#

About the last

timber pebble
#

it would appear they are peeling off the last term of each sum

strange fractal
#

Its the same like the step before but in the last one you can see first a^(n+1) that is added and the last term -b^(n+1)

timber pebble
#

$\sum_{\nu = 0}^n a^{\nu + 1}b^{n-\nu} = \sum_{\nu = 0}^{n-1} a^{\nu + 1}b^{n-\nu} + a^{n+1}b^{n-n}$

strange fractal
#

To get a^(n+1), I have to do n=v in the first sum?

#

First sum

woven radishBOT
#

jan Niku

timber pebble
#

doing nothing but pulling off the last term

strange fractal
#

And at b

#

Its not the same

timber pebble
#

nah, its the same deal

#

just from the other end

strange fractal
#

hmhhmhmhm

timber pebble
#

were plucking off the first term

strange fractal
#

so we set v=0?

timber pebble
#

$\sum _{\nu=0}^n a^\nu b^{n-\nu+1} = a^0b^{n-0+1} + \sum _{\nu=1}^n a^\nu b^{n-\nu+1}$

woven radishBOT
#

jan Niku

timber pebble
#

just like say we had uhh

#

$\sum _{i=0}^5 i$

woven radishBOT
#

jan Niku

timber pebble
#

we could write this as $0 + \sum_{i=1}^4 i + 5$

woven radishBOT
#

jan Niku

timber pebble
#

and pull out the first and last term

timber pebble
strange fractal
#

Would this be true? $0 + \sum_{i=2}^5 i + 1$

woven radishBOT
#

maizz01

timber pebble
#

so this is fine

strange fractal
#

yea ogey

timber pebble
#

youre not really doing anything other than applying commutative and associative property

strange fractal
#

yes

#

I have last one question

#

other task

timber pebble
#

yea im not sure what the hell this means

#

ah, no

#

just write out some terms

#

youll see

#

its actually just a reindexing, i think

#

but, write out some terms

#

if you cant sort it ping me after you try, but i think youll see

strange fractal
# timber pebble just write out some terms

Maybe its important to know, the task Substituted l=v-k.
I had that topic never before. Just started in.
As you can see l begins at 0 so I thought if v=k then l=v-k/k-k= 0 but I didnt get the v-1

#

Above

timber pebble
#

and important results

#

when youre working with sums

strange fractal
#

I know that I can split sums

#

And put them together

timber pebble
#

the one referenced here is $\sum _{i=0}^n i = \sum _{i=1}^n i = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$

strange fractal
#

thats it xD

#

Yea I see

timber pebble
#

you can derive this yourself, if you want more practice

strange fractal
#

Yesterday, I tried to understand without knowing this rule/technique whatever. It seems like the gauss sum

#

n(n+1)/2

#

or not xD

woven radishBOT
#

jan Niku

timber pebble
#

sorry i had i not n

strange fractal
#

np

timber pebble
#

well IDK typically

#

thats how i thought of it

strange fractal
#

I see

timber pebble
#

lemme see

#

this video does a great job of it

#

you can maybe convince yourself with enough scribbling you could have landed at the same result

strange fractal
#

Interesting

#

yea yea i see

#

Now I understood the formula

timber pebble
strange fractal
#

True true

timber pebble
#

theres maybe like sum of n, n^2, n^3

#

basel problem

#

not a ton come to mind thonk

strange fractal
#

xD

#

Thats a topic that makes math interesting tho

timber pebble
#

OH geometric

#

of course

#

$\sum x^n =\frac{1}{1-x}$

woven radishBOT
#

jan Niku

timber pebble
#

classic

strange fractal
#

There is difference between finite and infinite series in geometry

#

I noticed that yesterday

devout snowBOT
#

@strange fractal Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sleek hamlet
#

Hey guys I just need help with 7b

devout snowBOT
supple knot
#

,tex .point slope

woven radishBOT
#

dr. matlab plot

sleek hamlet
#

What

supple knot
#

Slope is the same as gradient

sleek hamlet
#

So?

supple knot
sleek hamlet
#

Idk what it means

supple knot
#

f(x)?

sleek hamlet
#

The part where m(x-a)+b

supple knot
#

Why is it confusing

#

m is slope

#

a is the x coordinate of some point

#

b is the y coordinate of that point

sleek hamlet
#

If a is the x coordinate what’s x

supple knot
#

x is a variable

supple knot
#

You just have numbers and variables for a, b, m

sleek hamlet
#

I still don’t get it

#

Why does the equation work

winter patrol
#

did you try rearranging the equation to slope intercept form?

devout snowBOT
#

@sleek hamlet Has your question been resolved?

winter patrol
#

can you show your attempt

sleek hamlet
#

K

supple knot
#

$r + s = \frac{t}{12} \Ra 12(r+s) = t$

woven radishBOT
#

dr. matlab plot

supple knot
#

what's 12(r+s) = ?

sleek hamlet
#

Ohh ok

sleek hamlet
#

Omg actually marry me bro thanks so much for ur help ❤️

devout snowBOT
#

@sleek hamlet Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @sleek hamlet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

proper terrace
devout snowBOT
proper terrace
#

im confused on what its trying to ask

restive river
#

I

#

Have a question

thin fern
#

It's probably because you unnecessarily wrote "a_n = "

rustic jetty
#

It seems like you put $a_n$ before your answer, is that visual or did you actually do that?

woven radishBOT
#

Dork9399

thin fern
rustic jetty
#

!occupied

devout snowBOT
#

Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).

proper terrace
#

its correct

#

thanks

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @proper terrace

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

south dust
#

I had a bonus question on my alg 2 H quiz and it was simply "x/3 = -9/x" I got "x= 3i√3" do you think this was right? what is did was got rid of the fractions by multiplying their denominators and ended up with x^2=-27 and i simplified using the square root method and got my answer. Did i mess up anywhere?

south dust
#

to go more in-depth with my work
x/3=-9/x
multiply by 3/1 on both sides and get:
x= -27/x
multiply by x/1 on both sides and get:
x^2 = -27
square root both sides:
√-27 = i√27
√27/√9 = 3
√9 = 3 also
giving me:
x = 3i√3

#

does this make sense, did i go about it wrong?

#

no one is going to answer?

tender cobalt
#

when you square root both sides you have a ±
so x^2 = -27 turns to x = ±√-27
from this, you should have x = ±3i√3

devout snowBOT
#

@south dust Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tender cobalt
#

the a0 z here looks like a typo - shouldnt it be a0 instead?

devout snowBOT
#

@tender cobalt Has your question been resolved?

dim turtle
#

na it’s fine

devout snowBOT
#

@tender cobalt Has your question been resolved?

supple knot
tender cobalt
#

they said "na"

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tender cobalt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pulsar tundra
devout snowBOT
pulsar tundra
#

i'm stuck on this question, i found this work online, but i'm not sure why x² + x², and (2)(x) are square rooted

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @pulsar tundra

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean robin
devout snowBOT
lean robin
#

how is this wrong?

#

did i distribute wrong?

winter patrol
#

show work

lean robin
#

was getting my phone*

low nexus
#

i'm pretty sure your work is correct?

winter patrol
#

-7i + 8i isn't -i

low nexus
#

(1 + i)(8-7i) = 8 - 7i + 8i + 7

#

oh wait sorry didn't realize you wrote that

lean robin
#

oh its + i

#

thanks cant believe i couldnt see that for a while thank you

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lean robin

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

magic sigil
#

someone help me pls.

devout snowBOT
woven radishBOT
#

charlie d amagiglio

magic sigil
#

im trying ti find the beta values for this regression function

#

i found the values but when i do the system of equation and substitution to find B1, I'm not sure if im correct

woven radishBOT
#

charlie d amagiglio

#

charlie d amagiglio
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

magic sigil
#

this is my beta one^^

#

and my beta zero is this

#

anybody gonna help me

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @magic sigil

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cerulean hollow
#

So if g(7) = 9 and f(9) = 16, then (f ∘ g)(7) =

I'm so confused, how do I do this?

winter patrol
#

do you understand (f o g) function compostion notation

cerulean hollow
winter patrol
#

$(f \circ g)(x) = f(g(x))$

woven radishBOT
#

ℝαμΩℕωⅤ

winter patrol
#

apply that here

cerulean hollow
#

so

#

16(9(7))?

winter patrol
#

no

#

how are you getting that

#

start by replacing x with 7

cerulean hollow
#

oh

#

do I replace g with 7 as well?

winter patrol
#

no

#

g is not a variable

#

nor are you told g has the value of 7

cerulean hollow
#

wait, so what do I do after f(g(7))?

winter patrol
#

use the info given in the question

cerulean hollow
#

OHHHHH

#

I see

#

crazy how I missed that

#

since g(7) = 9, when its f(g(7)) that is f(9) which is 16 right? @winter patrol

winter patrol
#

yes

cerulean hollow
#

aight thx

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @cerulean hollow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hidden hinge
devout snowBOT
hidden hinge
#

Similarities is that they are all autonomous

weak cove
#

should be easy to graph their direction fields then

weak cove
#

which are going to be invariant under translation

hidden hinge
weak cove
#

if that's what you want to call the independent variable sure

hidden hinge
weak cove
#

mhm

hidden hinge
hidden hinge
weak cove
#

well you don't want the whole direction field for the second part

#

you've desrcibed their similarities and differences from the direction fields in general

#

or atleast you know how to

#

right?

#

So moving on to part 2, each direction field, we plug in this initial value problem and we get just 1 solution curve, no longer an entire field of solution curves

#

which you can directly examine to answer that part of the question

weak cove
#

So do you understand how to proceed then?

hidden hinge
weak cove
#

two curves

#

both functions of t

hidden hinge
#

and the lines go through the point (0,1) where (t,y)

#

How would i solve this problem without using the direction field? or is that what im supposed to do

weak cove
#

You no longer need the direction fields for the second part

#

y'=y^2

#

y(0)=1

#

is a diffeq you should be able to solve

#

there is one unique solution

#

likewise with the other two equations

hidden hinge
#

i actually don't know how to solve it

#

😅

weak cove
#

$$y'=y^2$$
$$\frac{dy}{dx}=y^2$$

woven radishBOT
#

Austin

weak cove
#

If this doesn't help

#

this is called a seperable differential equation

#

so search a video on how to solve those if you don't recognize the name

#

they're very easy to solve

hidden hinge
#

ok

weak cove
#

and then plug in the initial condition

#

y(0)=1

hidden hinge
#

to solve for c?

weak cove
#

and repeat for the other two equations

weak cove
hidden hinge
#

ok will do ty

weak cove
#

No problem

hidden hinge
#

🙏

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hidden hinge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sinful mango
#

Zinc has a density of 7.10 g/cm^3. If a cylinder of zinc weighing 36.2g is completely immersed in a graduated cylinder that originally contains 33.79 mL of water, what will be the new water level? Please and thank you for help.