Channel closed
Closed by @potent ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 147 of 1
Closed by @potent ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My backyard is a rectangle with area 480 square feet and its length and width are both an integer number of feet. If the perimeter of the backyard is less than 120, how many different dimensions could the backyard have?
.close
Closed by @unborn stratus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I NEED HELP PLS
a tiny bit
i can speak french
Ah daccord
J’ai fait l’arc de sécante dans ma calculatrice de -17/8
Pour vérifier si c’est dans [pi, 3pi/2]
mais ce n’était pas dedans
@mild saddle
@lunar oar wow lool just abandoned me
I need u BACK
PLSS’SPLSLSLLSS
@lunar oar
oui d'accord
Ok lorsque j’ai fait l’arc de sécante de -17/8
je suis desole but my french is not going to be enough for math
OK
So I’ll speak English
I did sec-1 on my calculator
To verify if -17/8 is in [pi,3pi/2]
it ain’t IN IT
HOW?
Basically the calculator will give you the value for arcsec for values of theta between 0 and pi i believe
Closed by @gaunt olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats (n!)^(1/n)
Closed by @zenith fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yeah
I’m in high school and have no idea about Riemann sums sp cant help with this one
No that wasnt trolling
ah okay i appreciate thanks for confirming the answer
Because I know like when it is continouous the limit from both sides should be equal to k(k+4)
And lim sin(t)/t for t->0 is 1 so the limits for the upper one is 12
Closed by @cold hornet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A physicist found that a force of 0.68 N was measured between two charged spheres. The distance between the spheres was 1.0 m. Calculate the force between the two spheres when the distance was decreased to 0.50 m.
Can someone tell me how to work this
I believe (I haven’t took physics in years ) you’d use coloumbs law?
Try setting up simultaneous equations
Is that the newtons/ coulomb thing
the physics lesson im on has so many different formulas im shiteing myself just figuring out what to use
Prime Minister
Since everything is the same
yeah
oh okay thx gimme a momment i think i might have this
You have $F_1=0.68N$ i think you can find it if you divide by parts
Prime Minister
$\frac{F_1}{F_2}=\frac{k\times\frac{Q_1Q_2}{r_1^2}}{k\times\frac{Q_1Q_2}{r_2^2}}$
.68 divided by .25
Prime Minister
ks q1s q2s cancel out and you can solve for F2
I dont know the qs just r and the first f
yeah the ks and qs cancel out
I can do that with this equation?
s o youre left with $\frac{F_1}{F_2}=\frac{r_1^2}{r_2^2}$
Prime Minister
you know both f1, r1 and r2 so youre just solving for f2
0.5m squared
1/0.25 is 4
ye
so you have $F_1=4F_2$
Prime Minister
and f1 is .68
wait but the objects are getting closer how is the force smaller
oh yeah

$\frac{F_2}{F_1}=\frac{r_2^2}{r_1^2}$
Prime Minister
Prime Minister
$F_2=0.25*0.68=0.17N$
Prime Minister
hell if i know tbh
man i fucking hate maths
physics is confusiong
this discord server is my saveing grace actually explains it in a understandable way most of the time
$\frac{F_2}{F_1}=\frac{r_2^2}{r_1^2}=(\frac{r_2}{r_1})^2$
Prime Minister
not with me brace tight
Alrighty
i think i just cant do math
youre left up with a ratio of the forces with respect to the square of their distances
if you get your numbers right unlike me the F2 should be bigger than the F1 since theyre moving closer
and since the distance was decreased by 2 the force should be 4 times stronger
Yeah multiply it by 4
where did i go wrong 
Id tell you if i knew
I mean 2.7 was the right awnser
Didnt know you had to square the distance
Thanks anyways
God wait
?
i think it becomes $\frac{F_1}{F_2}=\frac{r_2^2}{r_1^2}$
Prime Minister
then $F_2=\frac{F_1*r^2_1}{r^2_2}=\frac{0.68}{0.25}$
Prime Minister
which means that $F_2=2.72N$
Prime Minister
i did it letsgoo
Maths
yeah its painful
Math is something simple disguised as something hard really
Cause in the end all it was was squareing .5 and divided .68 by it
@uncut cobalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @uncut cobalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just out of curiosity how "long" is real analysis? like in terms of content compared to calculus?
might be a better idea to ask in #discussion or #math-discussion
it shows no access to me
hv u not done RA
no
i know some from youtube and stuff but i never actually formally learnt it; i'm not in a math major (yet)
afaik, it depends on what you mean by "real analysis"
do you mean "rigorous calculus"?
or like lebesgue integration and co.
idk like
if you took a course in single variable calculus right and then followed by that you took a course in real analysis, how many hours would you spend on that ra course
well
i only did differential calculus in high school
but my uni is the same as yours
RA and proof based LA in 1st year, if you mean "rigorous calculus" by RA
i definitely spend a LOT more time in RA than i did in calculus
where do you do uni
university
uhh, i dont really wanna dox myself lol
i see
tbh though, i'm kinda bad at math lol
if you are good with proof-writing to start, it helps a lot
is this what your first year looks like approximate
it's in french but i think you can decipher what they mean
what is "Enjeux mondiaux"
ok lol
it's not the same as mine
but some parts are
i dont have a discrete math course
or algebraic structures for that matter
but ig you have some cs and maybe physics
i do have physics
but personally, i have put 10x less effort into physics and done 10x better so idk lol
bro's a show off
nah
bro is feynman
when i say 10x the mark
i dont mean the mark is like 100
i say 10x the mark, because my math grades are not good lol
Closed by @scarlet ember
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
gl with your studies
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where do I start for this
I did and found force friction as 15696 but idk where to go from there. Never did a question like this so I'm not sure which formula I'm using.
@floral cradle Has your question been resolved?
@floral cradle Has your question been resolved?
anyone please help me with this question-Consider that a, b, c, d are positive real numbers satisfying (a + c)(b + d) = ac + bd.
Find the smallest possible value of S=a/b+b/c+c/d+d/a
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please help me with this
try u sub
do u know how u sub works?
try taking the denominator, see what it goes to
Okay
Ok so it isn't making sense to me
Can you like show me how to substitute to the denominator
You put a variable and substitute it
Yes
u = denominator
Oh ok
Uhm I know how to like substitute a single term
Not the entire denominator but yes
I will learn
yes you will!:)
Ok so now I take the denominator as u, what do I do next
Omg ok
I think I figured it
Omg
I togally forgot how substitution works but I got it now
Thanks a lot guys
.close
Closed by @low tundra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Are there any good online tools or software to create and calculate probability diagrams?
I would like to calculate things similar to this...
Task 1: Score 3 total points with 50% chance at 3 points, 30% chance at 2 points, 10% chance at 1 points.
Task 2: Score 2 total points with 50% chance at 1 point.
etc. (with the points being cumulative between tries)
And calculate something along the lines of "What is the odds of being able to succeed at all tasks back to back in 8 total tries".
I've done it by hand when it is a lot amount of tries, but it becomes impossible for me to figure out over higher number of tries.
Thank you so much for your help, and let me know if it is clear/unclear! 🙂
Yeah
Python
Just write some code and display the results after running it a couple thousand times
I would only need to run it once, but I was hoping a tool existed so I didn't have to write a program to calculate probability diagrams
@pastel glacier Has your question been resolved?
@pastel glacier Has your question been resolved?
@pastel glacier Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pastel glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this quadratic inequality?
yes
x^2 +7x - 44 < 0
(x+11)(x-4) < 0
then draw a number line and plot x = -11 and x = 4
Got it that’s all
and check regions (-inf, -11), (-11, 4), and (4, inf)
Check for?
check whether the values of x in that region satisfy this
Okay 👍
this is a "word problem" so x can't be negative nor can a rectangle be like a linee, but ig you were curious on how to solve quadratic inequalities in general so yeah
Ye thanks alot

.close
Closed by @rain marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've done the first part of this question (prove that both of these power series have infinite radius of convergence) and computed p'(x) and q'(x)
I've also proven the identities 2p'(x)=q(x) and p(x)-q(x)=2xq'(x)
the last bit evades me
no rearrangement I make seems to get me any closer
@wintry coral Has your question been resolved?
@wintry coral Has your question been resolved?
@wintry coral Has your question been resolved?
@wintry coral Has your question been resolved?
@wintry coral Has your question been resolved?
Show your work for the previous parts
ratio test for p(x) and q(x)
not necessary to solve the second part whatsoever
but i have this for the first part of b)
$p'(x)=\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty{\frac{kx^{k-1}}{2k!}},q'(x)=\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty{\frac{kx^{k-1}}{(2k+1)!}}$
george clooney real account
This took me a little thinking but I see what to do now. Hint: Start by differentiating p^2 = 1 + xq^2.
If the derivatives of both sides are equal, then p^2 and 1 + xq^2 can only differ by a constant.
Finally, plug in x=0 to show that they are actually equal.
@wintry coral Has your question been resolved?
ah tysm
Closed by @wintry coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a^lnb -b^lna
0 r8
a^ln_b -a^ln_b
You switch a and b
What’s the property name again
idk base change property?
Like How would you define it
u want the proof of that property?
i think u can take lna on both ssides and try simplifying fromthere
How you mean
when u take lna on both sides, the powers come out
and then u shud be able to simplify it from there
kind of messy but i think it shud help
Closed by @grim mountain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help with 5 6 7
It is suggested that you limit yourself to one question per help channel, opening a new one once your original question is answered and your original channel has been closed. This is to make your channel easier to follow for potential helpers and can bring attention to the fact that your question has changed.
are you familar with laws of sines and cosines
not rlly
use the law of sine and cosines
idk what that is
angle r is 75 btw
yeahh
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
can u help me plz
from figure ∠Q = ∠X = 55⁰, ∠S = ∠Z = 50⁰
sum of angle of triangle is 180⁰,
∠Q + ∠S + ∠R = 180⁰
∠R = 180 - 55 - 50
∠R = 75⁰
this is how you get angle r
and btw have yuo tried solving for xy
for which problem
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
nah
try man
is it 55
hmm wait\
ohh i see
ok wiar 75 plus 50 -180 is the answer for 7th
how many
Could we do maybe js 2
Number 2?
i did those
this is a difrrent page
accidentally put 2 pages
i tried doing it as u can see opn the left prolly wrong though
There is no question 2 here
i ment 2 questions because he wasnt availble to help with all 10
Ok, give me a second to look at them
ok thank ytou
For question 3, how did you get x = 15?
i thought it added uyp to 90
so i ddi 75 plus 15
No
oh
I would look at this triangle like this. 2 sides are equal so it is isosceles which means 2 angles are also equal, with this triangle it's easy to tell but typically it is the angles that are not in the corner of the two equal sides
So the angle that has 75 is equal to the angle that has x
so x is 75?
Yes
okay i see
And the sum of all the angles of a triangle is 180 so you can solve for the last angle, which isn't exactly y but will help solve for y
Yes
so y would be 60
Yes
So the middle triangle has all equal sides and all angles are equal which means they are locked at 60 degrees each
Equilateral triangle
A straight line always equals 180 obvs. So solve for x
Yes
Yes, you have two out of the 3 angles
X+40+180?
Yeah, fat/fast fingers will do that. It's hard to type as fast as you think
I'm going to assume equals and yes
Not quite, that arrow is I am assuming meaning parallel to the other line that has an arrow
And if they're intersecting the same line then they'll have the same angle(s)
No
but i thought they the same
No
which are trhose
Which is x + y + ? = 180
No, none of those angles are obtuse
there paraellel?
The two yellow angles are equal since the two parallel lines intersect the same straight line
so y is 60
Yes
there we go
They're funky looking arrows
tahyea lol
for 6
i mean 5
i see the line so that equalds 180
the straight line
Yep so the missing angle is?
x
No
y?
i think im looking at the wring ine
im looking at the one going from the right of x to y
Look at the line that has 60 and 70 on it first
Those two you can't solve for using straight line = 180
What is that missing angle
50?
so y is 50
Not quite
70?
No
Yes
There is another way to tell from the beginning and it's called the bowtie theorem, if it looks like a bowtie you can just about assume the inner two angles pointing towards eachother are equal
Yes x = 40
idk abt y
You are given 1 angle and the other (not the angle y) can be solved for using straight line = 180
Yes, but the other angle above y
No
but y is 160 is correct
oh
The yellow angle = 180
y is 70
Yep
there we go
I'm going to repost the page picture quickly so I don't have to keep scrolling up and down
Yep
and so is y
No
3y + 3x = 9x = 45
Or 9x = 45
3y + 3x = 45
You solved for x which was 5
3y + 3(5) = 45
y is 20
No
25
10
Yes
This one is tedious
looks scary
Very 
Yes
(20x+4y)=52
Yes
do i add those 2 together
No
oh i just solve?
Yes-ish
Technically you would solve for either y in terms of x (y = 52/4 + 20x/4) or you can plug and chug/use basic multiplication
idek
For instance 6 times what equals a number that has 8 in its ones place?
5
6 * 5 = 30
yea
6 * ? = _8
5
6 times what =38
There is also 10x in that equation
10x + 6y = 38
10 times a (whole) number can't have an 8 in the ones place, but 6 can
Both
Yes
ok 15
o dont see what i do
i see is isocolies so they both are equal
the equationa
Yes, set up the equation
Set up the equation
Not plus
8x - 22 = 6x
But yes 11
So I'm assuming you meant = and hit + again
@restive river
yea
Wdym are they all equal? The sides are equal since it's an isosceles triangle
And they are on the equal sides
The angles are there to show/hint it is isosceles
so i just make the equation again
Yes
The triangle is equilateral so all the angles are equal, and there is only way for the angles to all be equal on a triangle. They're always 60 degrees on equilateral triangles
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
s0 x is 30
Yep
Just use .close
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A guy walked 18 km wich is his dayly walks 60% how much dose he have to walk
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Idk where to start
He has 40% of the way to go right
Oh i did it the answer is 30 right
.close
Closed by @bright juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is the RHS derived?
.close
Closed by @static pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @mellow scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could anyone explain why the answer isnt infinity/infinity so like not defined 🫣
inf/inf is not undefined it is an indeterminant form of a limit
which means its value can't be determined unless some manipulation is done
oh wait right
ty!
.close
Closed by @late girder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the sum of all 4-digit numbers whose digits are different from each other and do not contain the digit 0.
<@&286206848099549185>
I suppose if we add the last digits of our numbers, we add 1 n times, 2 n times, 3 n times and so on. Same for all other digits. Now we need to find n
The question likely then becomes: How many 4-digit numbers with different digits and not containing 0 can we create that have the last digit 1/2/3/…
Any idea on how that number could be calculated?
Sequence equation maybe but tweaked for the conditions
<@&286206848099549185> there is such a hint
Well first thing is that out of 1000 there are 900 numbers without a 0
1-9 x 10
Then do it again for the hundreds
Wait no im dumb
Lol
900 i mean
do you know the answer
Not in the fucking slightest lol, we are at the gathering clues stage
I mean if you know the equation then thatd be nive
Nice
the total number of such 4-digit numbers = 9 * 9 * 8 * 7 = 4536.
The sum of the digits (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9) = 45.
As there are 4536 numbers, the sum of the units place = 45 * 4536.
For the tens place
The digits will occupy the tens place as the same number of times as they do in the units place so obv the sum of the tens place = 45 * 4536 * 10 (as each digit in the tens place represents a value ten times greater).
the sum of the hundreds place = 45 * 4536 * 100.
For the thousands place:
Again, the sum of the thousands place = 45 * 4536 * 1000.
calculate the total sum:
Sum = Sum of units place + Sum of tens place + Sum of hundreds place + Sum of thousands place
@forest nimbus
does this make sense
i have a speech to text makes it easier ig
for big sentences i use it
?
Howd you get this?
Like why specifically 998*7
9*8
There are 9 options (1-9) for the first digit, 9 options (excluding the first digit and 0) for the second digit, 8 options for the third digit, and 7 options for the fourth digit
so then the total number is this
ig
i was not sure that is why
Wait fuck we overlooked something
it should be 9.8.7.6
Since numbers are non-repeating?
Number of ways to arrange 9 numbers in 4 places = $ 9 \choose 4$
$$= \frac{9!}{4!}$$
Snöwdinger
Digits are different from each other
oh yeah hmmm

There are 9 choices for the thousands place (since it cannot be 0), 9 choices for the hundreds place (as it cannot be the same as the thousands place), 8 choices for the tens place (as it cannot be the same as the thousands or hundreds place), and 7 choices for the units place (as it cannot be the same as the thousands, hundreds, or tens place).
27360
Its not because it will repeat
we can use the formula for the sum of an arithmetic series: S = (n/2)(first term + last term)
howw
How will it not?
bruhh lol
Bro 9 options for tens and ones that means you included the multiples of 11
the fourth digit can be chosen in 7 ways (from 0 to 9 excluding the digits already used as the first, second, and third digits) that is why the total number of such 4-digit numbers is 9 * 9 * 8 * 7 = 4536.
hm
Repetition and 0 is not allowed in this permutation ._.
number of ways to arrange numbers in first digit = 9
' '' second digit =8
' '' 3rd =7
' '' 4th digit =6
?
Mhmm
to answer this question, all one needs to do is count how many times each digit appears in each location, and sum that
Assuming positive 4-digit numbers with no repetition, and without digit 0 amd then for each number formed we have 9 choices for the first digit, 8 choices for the second digit, 7 choices for the third digit, and 6 choices for the fourth digit. Therefore, we can form 987*6 = 3024 such 4-digit numbers. The smallest such number is 1234, and the largest is 9876. The average of 1234 + 9876 = 11110/2 = 5555. This is also the average of all the numbers
Therefore, the sum of all the 4-digit numbers not containing 0, and without repetition of digits is 5555 * 3024 = 16,798,320.
What would that look like?
it would look like this
… sort of
Jesus christ how did you type so fast
Also you changed it bleh
Noice equations, very useful
How would it not repeat the digits tho, like if you have 9 single digit number options, thatd mean it would take up every number spot
huh sorry i didnt underdtand
There are only 9 number options right cause we dont have a 0?
So lets say 1234+1235+1236+1237+1238+1239
We have to start at 1234
So then why is the ones digit 9 options
Then after that wed have to add it to 1243+1245+1246
16798320
Howdya getit
i didnot the answer was written
Chad
that is my answeeer
Bro why do we have 9 digit options in the ones
Its literally impossible
From the start
We only have like 6 options
..
Nvm im dumb
Aight fair enough
Just realized the mistake
@thorn bramble Has your question been resolved?
This is really just the formula we need. It’s based off of the reasoning I gave earlier
The solution is correct but I’m not sure the reasoning is complete… WHY can we simply take the average?
i'm not sure how much rigor we'd need here but you'd expect each digit to be distributed evenly/symmetrically as nothing's weighted here
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help solving this kind of problem
there's roughly two ways you could go about solving this problem...
the easier way would be to consider the following:
the arcs WU (23x - 5) and WU (37x + 5) make up the entire circle, right?
yes, making it = to 360
so, should I just do the whole circle first? then answer the tangent?
yes that's the more straight-forward method
I was thinking that it was supposed to be something else thanks
is it also possible to add those 3 and make it equal to 450?
or no?
nvm
thanks!!
.close
Closed by @ebon yoke
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi I need to transform/convert the term:
((b → a) ↔ c) =
((b → a) → c) ∧ (c → (b → a)) =
(¬(¬b ∨ a) ∨ c) ∧ (¬c ∨ (¬b ∨ a)) =
((b ∧ ¬a) ∨ c) ∧ (¬c ∨ ¬b ∨ a) =
(b ∧ ¬a) ∨ c∧ ¬c ∨ (¬b ∨ a) =
(b ∧ ¬a) ∨ 0 ∨ (¬b ∨ a) =
(b ∧ ¬a) ∨ (¬b ∨ a) =
(b ∧ ¬a) ∨ ¬b ∨ a =
¬b ∨ ¬a ∨ a =
¬b ∨ True = True
somewhere in here is a mistake, my assumption is at line 5, after this step (line 4): "((b ∧ ¬a) ∨ c) ∧ (¬c ∨ ¬b ∨ a) ="
so first question, is this the mistake? "(b ∧ ¬a) ∨ c∧ ¬c ∨ (¬b ∨ a) =", can I convert it from line 3 to 4 like that?
my new approach:
((b → a) ↔ c) =
((b → a) → c) ∧ (c → (b → a)) =
(¬(¬b ∨ a) ∨ c) ∧ (¬c ∨ (¬b ∨ a)) =
((b ∧ ¬a) ∨ c) ∧ (¬c ∨ ¬b ∨ a) =
(b ∧ ¬a) ∨ c ∧ ¬c ∨ (¬b ∨ a) =
(b ∧ ¬a) ∨ 0 ∨ (¬b ∨ a) =
(¬a ∧ b) v a v ¬b v 0 =
a v b v ¬b v 0 =
a v 1 v 0 =
a v True v False =
a v True =
True
if you are unsure whether you are mistaken in that line, have you tried writing out the truth tables and confirming they are logically equivalent?
it´s not, so i made another mistake
there is false and true in the truth table
.close
Closed by @red spire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how were they able to calculate the lim equalling L
You usually pick L to use in your proof by using other methods from Calculus etc
Show the whole statement
Yea that's just the eps-N definition of a sequence converging to L
is there a proof for that?
There usually aren't proofs for definitions
The theorem here only gives you the fact that the sequence has a limit, it doesn't tell you a nice expression for the limit. In general you may not have a nice expression for the limit other then L=lim_{n->inf} a_n
In general, most real numbers do not have nice expressions for them (there are uncountable real numbers, but countably many mathematical expressions that equal some real number, since each mathematical expression must be written as a finite sequence of characters), and each real number is the limit of some increasing sequence of rational numbers lower than them (so the sequence satisfies this theorem)
@mighty copper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got a rombus the perimeter is 8 and the radius of the inscribed circle is 0,5 i need to find the big angle of the rombus
What did you try
By big angle you mean the larger angle of the rhombus right?
Yes
My brain is fried
The sides would be 2sqrt2 right
Oh i mixd up area and perimeter
Its 2
8/4 is the side isn't it
would the diameter of the inscribed circle not be the side of the rhombus?
Ik the sides there all 2 now how do i find the angle
No
Perimeter is 8 rombuses sides are equal
So the 1 side is 2
probably not
okeh apologies
How dk i find the big angle now tho?
oh sorry i was basing my assumptions on the drawing HAHHAHAHA
as far as i see pythagoras a bunch of times should work
Finding a angle??
i mean a square is a rhombus
but it doesn't work in general
i mean if you can bash the side lengths then ye just take the sin or cos
but if you don't have trig at your disposal im not sure
you should know that if a line is tangent to a circle, then drawing a line from the centre of circle to the tangent point creates right angles
then have fun constructing equations using pythagoras
yeah thats gonna take a while
Like this?
yes
How does that make a triangle?
it doesn't, it just gives you right angles
so with those right angles you might have a hunch as to which right angle triangles to construct
seems like a good starting point
Idk can’t do it
the problem with me telling you which triangles to use is it immediately ruins the problem turning it into thoughtless algebra
and finding hints to give is hard
but i think just connecting the centre of the circle to each corner should be a decent hint
So if i find the triangles the problem would be easier?
should be
Is this the triangle?
that's one of them, you need a few more
eh, ye that's most of them lol
due to symmetry you only need a quarter of that
Wait can i just not find 1 hypotnus and use sin?
you can, which was my whole point
Ok so radius is 0,5 and the side would be 1 right?
i have no idea where you're getting that from, but no
its 2 but
I need pyth to find the hypotnus right
One side i 0,5
How do i find the hypotnus
?
huh, interesting
i got the answer but it feels like you need a calculator because that's not the most common value
but i guess if you can use a calculator it's easy enough
So how do i find it
pythagoras works, but easier is to use similar triangles
Is the hypotnus sqrt5/2?
i didn't actually calculate it (which is why similar triangles is easier) but it doesn't feel right 
what's your final answer for the angle?
Yea that wrong
How would the hypotnus be with similar triangles 0,5/x equals 0,5/x ??
And the other side would be 1
And ill find hypotnus from that?
lemme give you this annotated diagram of a quarter of the rhombus+circle
the big triangle is formed by 2 smaller right angle triangles
show that the smaller right angle triangles are similar
Is the radius in both triangles?
sure is
no, and justification needed
Is it not 2 radiuses?
no
if you draw the diagram to scale the answer is a much clearer no
Oh i see it its not
none of the side lengths besides the 0.5 are nice numbers, so you can throw those guesses out of the window
The other side is 2-x no?
yes
i'm not sure what you mean by "the first bit"
0,5/2-x
that's an expression and not a statement
but it is a ratio of 2 sides of one of the triangles so i'd say you're on the right track
0.5 is not the hypotnus in either triangle
2-x/0,5??
i'm not sure what you're trying to do
because you're just giving me expressions without explaining what you want to do with it
and 2-x is also not the hypotnus of either triangle
Naa i just don’t get how to do it
ok, i told you to show that the smaller triangles are similar to each other
now show that they're also similar to the big triangle
Wym show how do i show that
have you learned how to prove triangles are similar and what kinds of conditions you can use for those
Are th angle equal?
yes
and i'm asking you to convince yourself that the angles are equal so all 3 triangles are similar to each other
if you just get told what's equal and what's not you won't be able to do similar problems and will have to come back to ask every time
Ok now what do i do?
start solving the problem using properties of similar triangles
specifically if two triangles are similar then the ratios between corresponding sides is constant
nope, one of those pairs aren't corresponding sides
i'd recommend labelling each vertex and listing which triangles are similar..but it probably gets more confusing
i guess just label each side "short", "long", and "diagonal" and see which sides correspond to each other
Wi h one is not corresponding?
actually neither, the entire equality doesn't make sense
at this point i think it might be easier for you to go back to bruteforcing with pythagoras..but this really should be easier if you can correctly identify which sides correspond to each other in the 2 smaller triangles
here's one with labelled vertices, please show which 3 triangles are similar
@bright juniper Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bright juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
3 * -4 is -12?
yes
.close
Closed by @opal falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct?
Solve this if x=3.
@opal falcon Has your question been resolved?
@opal falcon Has your question been resolved?
yes its correct
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im having trouble with this
i need the 3rd and 6th reason
Number three is because of the right angle IHJ.
right angle IHJ?
.close
Closed by @digital fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would somebody be able to explain how this smooth(er)step function by ken perlin actually works, or point me in the right direction?
I know that when you pass in t to the function, it returns a value that is closer to 0 or 1 depending on if t is less than or more than 0.5, but I do not understand at all how we get to 6*t*t*t*t*t - 15*t*t*t*t + 10*t*t*t and i would like to understand instead of just mindlessly using it.
function Fade(t) {
return 6*t*t*t*t*t - 15*t*t*t*t + 10*t*t*t;
}