Channel closed
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 125 of 1
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im solving a series differential equation, how would I check my answer?
@terse bolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello help in French please
jsuis là
Question ; rappeler la structure d’espace vectoriel réel de M2 (R) et montrer qu’il est de dimensions fini.
Ah mon sauveur 😂
Faut qu’on m’explique ça vrm Mmdrr
rappeler la structure d’espace vectoriel réel de M2 (R)
@jaunty orbit
Jsuis la jsuis la
J’essayais de comprendre l’exercice mmdrr
M2(R) c’était quoi déjà ..
C’est la matrice carré ?
t'as ça dans ton cours ou pas ?
Attend
ça serait bizarre qu'on te l'aie jamais montré s'ils te disent "Rappeler la structure..."
Et je te jure son cours a elle il ressemble a rien
ah shit
Rappel moi la structure stp 😂
$\mathcal M _2(\mathbb R)$ c'est les matrices carrées $2\times 2$
aPlatypus
oui
faut spécifier les opérations aussi si tu veux être réglo
Pour répondre à la question je dois dire quoi
C’est à dire ?
ça veut dire quoi ajouter deux matrices ?
Addition
ça veut dire quoi multiplier une matrice par un nombre ?
C’est le produit de la matrice par un nombre 🤷🏻♀️
oui mais comment tu le calcules hehe
Je multiplie tout les coefficients de la matrice par ce nombre non ?
oui voilà
Okay ça nous emmène où ces raisonnement du coup ?
et pour l'addition de deux matrices ?
il y a pas de raisonnement là
Bah on additionne les coefficients des deux matrices ensemble et ça nous donne une nouvelle matrice ?
c'est juste définir les objets sur lesquels tu travailles
Hmm ok ça roule
yup
bon ok
maintenant dimension finie
Qu’est ce que c’est Bahaha
c'est quoi la dimension d'un espace vectoriel ?
Jpppp mais je te jure
R^n sa dimension c'est n oui
dim(E) c'est le nombre de paramètres qu'il faut pour décrire tous les éléments de E, pour le dire intuitivement
(E c'est un espace vectoriel)
D’accord et dimensions finie c’est quoi
que tu peux le décrire avec un nombre fini de paramètres
par exemple R^n (n c'est un entier positif) c'est un espace de dimension finie
dim(R^n) = n, t'as besoin de n paramètres
il y a des espaces vectoriels qui sont pas de dimension finie (sinon on se casserait pas le cul à avoir cette notion lol)
mais bon là c'était juste pour donner une idée de ce que c'est la dimension (l'idée qu'on se fait un peu tous, on dit bien 2D, 3D, etc.. dans la vie de tous les jours)
Oui
et j'ai pas tellement envie de te faire un cours sur la dimension, les bases, les familles indépendantes, génératrices, tout le tralala, maintenant tout de suite
donc je vais te suggérer une bonne série de vidéos vu que ta prof sait pas trop faire son taf
Oui je vois c’est pour ça je pense je vais voir des vidéos sur les dimensions parce que là jsuis perdu
Mmmdrr oui on a pensé à la mm chose
T’as des vidéo à me suggérer
Mais des trucs vraiment compréhensible
Je vais voir mercii
@jaunty orbit Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i get started/what formula am i supposed to use (find x)
do you know the formula for the area of a trapezoid
Closed by @storm igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I was wondering if I could get help with this, i've already got the derivative but I don't know where to go from here
write down the derivative you get
I end up getting:
mx^m-1(1-x)^n+x[n(1-x)^n-1(-1)]
$mx^{m-1}(1-x)^n-nx^m(1-x)^{n-1}$
Something like this
yeah
the x following the plus is to the power of M
i mistexted it
everg
yeah, which to do that I would be able to set the derivative function = to zero right?
All i get at those points turns out to be my endpoints 0 and 1
unless I managed to do it wrong
everg
$m(1-x)-nx=m-(n+m)x=\iff 0<x=\frac{m}{n+m}<1$ here's your zero 😉
everg
gg
the only part im confused on is how you manage to change the form of the equation
er how it looks h
here
I group the big common part x^k(1-x)^h
okay
it was useless because it had root only in 0 and 1....but we searched a root inside this interval
so i group it and study what i get
oss: there is only one zero
inside
because you are a good student 😉
gg
.close
Closed by @shut vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
try this
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ayo
kirchoff law shit
bro what
or simplify series/parallel connections
it doesnt apply
also don't call me bro.
mb ann
anyway what are you talking about with kirchoff's laws being inapplicable
i mean ok w/e like it's probably overkill here
simplify series/parallel connections
6th and 7th resistors become a single 4 Ω, and the 2nd and 3rd become a single 12 Ω, for a start.
you get 2Ω resistance between the two rightmost nodes*
itll be a lot better to actually draw the entire circuit at each simplification stage
but yes R4 is in series with the entire right part of the thing
so is r1 no?
no
then what is r1
it's in series with a bigger parallel connection
are r2and r3 in series
sure they are
no
again
you are trying to reason through it blind
this will not do
you have to draw the circuit at each stage of simplification
Closed by @trim kraken
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.closed
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$$n^{n^{n^n}} \equiv n^{n^n} \pmod{9}$$
arjun the learner
solve for n?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
Yes
consider three cases:
actually wait you might want to handle the case n = 1 mod 9 separately
(it is trivial though)
Closed by @marsh bone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi may i know how to do this
@deft hearth Has your question been resolved?
@deft hearth Has your question been resolved?
@deft hearth spm maths?
yess
yea
i see
maybe uve done this b4
ok so do you see the small triangle on the right of the square
yes
since its an equilateral triangle, one of the angle is 60 degs
yep
dang i didnt see that
you know the opposite side is 4m
so using trig you can know the hypotenuse and the adjacent side
and the left and right triangles are equal to each other
so you basically know the whole bottom length
Since its equilateral, just multiply that bottom length by 3
wait isnt that equal to 1
bc it says perimeter =4
oh yeah mb
but still icant find the answer
the ans is a
oh i forgot to multiply by 3
thx
.close
Closed by @deft hearth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do this?
please ping me if you can help me, thankyou!
is there a link between $0.\dot{7}$ and $0.0\dot{7}$? Maybe a factor between them?
rafilou2003
hmm
they both only have 7 recurring?
yes, but one starts one decimal later...
so maybe 0.7 repeating = ... * 0.07 repeating?
yes
$0.4\dot{7} = ...+...$
rafilou2003
0.4 + 0.7 recurring
its 7/90
yes
Now rewrite that using this
4/90?
Close
Here
:
0.47777 = 0.4 + 0.0777777
0.07777 = 7/90
So
0.47777 = 0.4 + 7/90
Does that make sense?
That’s alright
Do u see how 0.47777 = 0.4+7/90
We are just plugging 7/90 for 0.0777
Since they are the same
yes
4/9
4/10
Yep
So
Now using the earlier equation
Plug in 4/10 for 0.4 since they are the same
If 0.47777=0.4+7/90
And 4/10 = 0.4
What can u plug in for 0.4
its 0.32222 + 7/90 = 0.4?
Basically take 0.4777 = 0.4 + 7/90
But replace 0.4 with 4/10
Because they are the same thing
yes
yeah
I urgently have to go tommoroww in like 8 hours or so ill look at the messages sorry
Ur fine
Just remember to add 4/10 + 7/90
If u need help
Look up a video abt adding fractions
thanks a lot
Ur welcome
@visual nest Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve a question like this?
Solve the integral first.
how
I do not think that is solvable with elementary functions
so yh looked it up but no idea what an erf is
You should use ftoc
It is just a function defined by that integral
Ok so you know what ftoc is right
Cure Miracle
Closed by @candid moat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
need help with this question
there are two equal glasses that contain water. in of the glasses there is a rock. the height of the waater in both of the glasses is equal
what will happen if you will add an equal glass of water to each one of them
will the first glass be taller or the second or they will both stay the same height?
isnt the rock gonna have some kinda impact on that?
the rock doesn't care how much water is below
it would do the same thing, the top part has to look the same
Closed by @normal phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the reason for changing the subject?
you need them to be y = (stuff with x) to do the washer/disk method like that
because y describes the radius of the disk
If the values/bounds were y values would I have to do so?
yeah the important part is that you're revolving around the x axis
What if it revolves around y?
the radius is just the function no?
Nope
The function just tells you what region you're integrating over
you want to "add up" the contribution from every point (x,y) in your region
@young crane Has your question been resolved?
So around x it will be pi*y^2?
Is this correct? Calculating the area under a curve using the trapezium rule
@young crane Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @young crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
you can take the integrla by rewriting sin^5x in terms of a trig identity
do you know what trig identities are?
can you think of a way
to transform
sin^5x
so that
you can u substitution later
and simplify the equation enough
to integrate?
let me know
if you need a little push
nah you dont need that here
use this
sin^5x
take one sin out
sin^4x
sin^4x = (1-cos^2x)^2
so then your equation is
integral of (1-cos^2x)^2 sinx cos^4x dx
and you u sub this
have you never done a problem like this before?
have you learned u subbing?
u substitition
okay
well when you u sub
you usually have to derive it for du and then
you can see what it can cancel out from the equation
for example
if you let u = cosx here
trty
its asking you for coeffients because it wants you to integrate
this is easy
if you'll just take the time to try it
lmk if you get stuck
❤️
@tacit agate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How does the square root 5 go to 25
,rotate
It goed to the 4th root of 25
Because (sqrt(5))^4=(5^(1/2))4=5^2=25
So sqrt(5)=4th root of 25
Closed by @mellow mountain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can i finish this
Or did i do a mistake somewhere?
I have to use log at the end
Since i cant use a calculator
That's 1^x/6^x at the end?
Yes
So (1/6)^x at the right?
Yep
And then?
This
Yeah but i am not finished yet, am I ?
I have the solution from my teacher but I didnt understand
She had like from 1/4 = (1/6)^x
To 4=6^x
Oh yeah, that's another way
To do that, multiply both sides by 6^x and 4
Then simplify
Both work
Can you show it in like a $$
Thank you
Thats complicated
But notice another thing you can do is just to take log of both sides at the start of here
How would that look like
If you do that you'll get some ugly logs of fractions
Yeah ok then nvm
If you do this you do more work up front but get nicer logs at the end.
Yes thats what we have to do
Either way after simplifying your answer at the end you'll get the same thing.
We have to use log or lg
Ah well it doesn't matter which log you choose much either.
There's a property of logs that let you write any log in terms of any other.
Makes sense lg is log base 10
Sometimes this changes based on classes and regions. It's kind of a conventions type thing.
Ah ok
In computer science often lg means log base 2 lol
Didnt know that
Best to just ask when in doubt. But here ur fine your course does lg for log base 10.
You have this $log_b(a^x)=xlog_b(a)$ no matter what base $b$ you pick.
DootDooter
So to finish out your q you can do whatever log you like unless the question says to use a specific one.
Fwiw I did not check your work for errors.
Why is it x = log base 4 (6)
But since your prof got the same thing it seems you did things right.
And not log base 6 (4)
I don't know what you mean?
Yeah i think its ok
4 = 6^x right
Yeah
So your solution says $x=log_{4}(6)$?
Yeah
DootDooter
Yes
I think they might have meant 6
Isnt it $x=log_{6}(4)$
corazon
Pretty sure they meant thay
It's because of this
b here is the base
This property doesn't work if the base and the argument don't match.
Let me write out something
You have a problem like the top equation
You're going to log both sides with some log with base c
Too complicated for me lol
Ah shoot
But thats how it should be right?
We didnt do something like that yet
You're doing something like that now lol
Oh
Yes this is right but idk what you mean by the number that can be anything
You can pick any base you like, but this specific property applies when the base and the input to the log are the same
Like log_2(5) is not 1 but log_2(2) is 1 for example.
log_6(100000000) is not 1 but log_6(6) is 1
See what I mean?
No this is always true
How is that possible
No matter what base you pick you can always apply the log to both sides (so long as the numbers on either side are positive).
Here one sec
So both are correct?
All I'm saying is something like this.
If you have an equation, and the values on either side are positive you can take the log of both sides using any base you like
But what you CAN'T do is say log_b(c)=1 unless you know for sure that b=c
This is why I'm saying I think your solution has a typo.
Is this true?
Yeah but a≠b
Like 4=6^x
4≠6
Not sure off the top of my head.
You see this equation? Take the log of both sides.
Try it with both base 4 and base 6
Solve both for x
In one of them you'll have log_6(6)=1
In the other you'll have log_4(4)=1
In both cases you can still solve for x
?
Moment
I don't know what you're asking.
I'm telling you that I think your solution has an error BECAUSE of the thing I'm pointing out to you.
This cant be right or what do you say
Which one has an error the one above or the bottom one
.
If we have 4=6^x
If you do what I'm asking you to do you can check the correct answer in base 6 and base 4
.
For what it's worth this should usually be false
They are reciprocal of each other by change of base
This is the change of base formula for logs
If you swap the b and the x you flip the fraction here
Show your work
Do this
On paper or some other writing device, by hand
Not sure exactly how to explain that. It's the same idea as adding a number to both sides or multiplying a number on both sides. But in this case you are plugging each side into the log
Since your two numbers on either side of the equal sign are actually equal, then your two log expressions will also be equal.
Like, if you know a=b, then log(a)=log(b)
Going from a=b to log(a)=log(b) is often referred to as "taking the log of both sides" for the equation a=b.
Do it once with base 6 and once with base 4
The x has to go ?
So, like apply log base 6 to both sides first.
We'll just do base 4 after we sort out base 6
Yeah, the bases have to match to apply a log on both sides. For ex 2=2 but log_2(2) and log_2(3) are different numbers.
Wait yes is that right?
In general for any base you can do log_c(a^b)=b log_c(a)
Meaning if you have a single number to a power in the log you can pull out the power and put it in front of the log as multiplication
Ah so xlog_6(6)
Yeah you see that equals log_6(4) by your equation right?
Yes
Do you know that log_6(6)=1?
Thats what my teacher wrote as the solution
Okay, we're not at that yet.
Log_4(6)
Your teacher wrote something different.
I'm trying to show you why I think it's not right
For later I think I can do a bot command
So she made a mistake right?
,w log_4(6)
Thats what i am saying aswell
,w log_6(4)
You see that these are different numbers?
Yes
.
Okay, but there is a second way we can check our work too.
Because imo she did
Yeah and we can double check that our work is correct.
Try the same process but take the log base 4 this time
Yes finally i got my validation
Yeah yeah but you need to be able to show this yourself.
What if she does not believe you? :p
Do this
Yes good
So 1 =xlog_4(6)
I dont have to solve x btw
Wdym?
Since we arent allowed to use calculatoe in the exam we dont have to solve x
Calculator
Hmm well this is till a good way to double check at least
Okay so u see how she got the reciprocol of this?
,w 1/log_4(6)
Whats reciprocol
This matches our answer
If you have a number like d, the reciprocal of d is 1/d.
Ah ok
But it doesn't match he answer
Which makes sense because hers is the reciprocal of ours.
Yeah thank you very much for your help i really appreciate it
No problem
,close
.close
Closed by @modest dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I have the following afirmation A=BX being A, B and X matrix of order n, if I do some permutation to the following matrix (A|B) and then I set the new matrix as (P|Q), would P=QX?
maybe that's so clear idk how to express it better
@dry sentinel Has your question been resolved?
@dry sentinel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dry sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo is anyone good wit logs

ive go this question
i got x=exp(a/b x (2ln3/ln7))
shits wrong i know it
<@&286206848099549185>
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
alr
bascially i tried to expand a and b
to see if i coulld be able to cancel anything out and make it into a quadratic
and then solve it then
but it just put me back to square 1 if that makes sense
i jit confused on how any of this works
Yes that does seem like going in circles
Try just changing the base 9 to be base 7
how
About this?
yeah
have you learned logs of bases other than e
Apply logs to both sides
nat logs is something we just got introduced to
And choose a base that makes it convenient to solve for t
lnx = ( s x 2log7(3)
x = exp(s x 2log7(3))
this should be right i think
wait
yeah nah that should be the answer
@vale magnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does it go to 25
they used lhopital rule here
Closed by @potent whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi can someone help me do my homework im really confused and i need to turn it in soon
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
Start with problem 1. Any ideas how to solve it?
any guesses or intuitions?
no idk anything abt this topic i havent been to school
Congruent polygons means they are the same size and shape
This means the sides TC and TK have the same length
congruent?
Definition of congruent means two shapes that are the same.
what question are u stuck on?
if it's #1 note that tc is congruent to tk
You're given TC=8x-11 and TK=3x+24 and TC=TK
Try solving for x
@plain turtle Has your question been resolved?
@plain turtle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Yes
ok
It's 14
and ur solving it for something?
For 1 ? 10 = something
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Also you need to open your own channel, please read #❓how-to-get-help
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am taking intermediate mathematics at my Community College. I haven't done math in about 4 years, currently 21. I am confused on how the process is to achieve this answer.
I am stuck on how the equation goes from "6(3/4)" or any other of the 3 pictures to "5/2" or "3/2"
It looks like in all three cases y is given to be equal to something, but the pictures don't seem to show that
6y turns into 6(3/4) in the first, which suggest to me that y is at some point given to be equal to 3/4
so I already solve for y in all those pics, I just took a snap of what the software was telling me
Not really a system unless you're working with the same values of x and y, which you're not
These are just substituting a given value of y (or what you solved for y previously) and then solving for x
correct
So it could be systems by substitution but it's only the substitution part of that problem
In the first picture, the 6 is likely distributed to the fraction and then subtracted from both sides to obtain -x
right but how lol, I asked a lot of my friends and they all explain me it differently but I never get it
like 6(3/4)
goes to 3/2
Let's start with $-x + 6(\frac{3}{4}) = 3$
M. Frost
Do you recall what happens when we multiply a fraction by a number?
Not quite
Let's convert the fraction to a decimal and see if it'll be more intuitive
$\frac{3}{4} = 0.75$
M. Frost
What's 6 * 0.75?
4.5
Correct
Now multiplying a number to a fraction is similar: you just want to multiply the nominator of the fraction by the number
so $6(\frac{3}{4}) = \frac{6 \cdot 3}{4} = \frac{18}{4}$
M. Frost
i understand that
Which is 9/2, or 4.5
ok, so.... 9/2 converts to 3/2 how
So now we have $-x + \frac{9}{2} = \frac{3}{2}$
M. Frost
bc i saw this on google when i searched the same problem
How might you change this to get x on its own?
Yup, what is 3/2-9/2?
-27/2
The denominators are the same, so we don't need to multiply anything
We're simply subtracting one from the other
oh
It's essentially like doing 3-9
Yes
or add depending the case
Same denominators means that you can add and subtract just the numerators without problems
so -6/2
When the denominators are different is when you need to change them up
-6/2 can be simplified
I saw that the 3 changed to a 3/2, is that because we have the 2 as the lcd?
Im used to multiplying the lcd which is 2 to other terms but that would give me completely something else
the amount of different tasks is immense in math im sorry lol just trying sponge this up lol
Oh you could do that, then you're left with whole numbers
I may have mixed you up
But you'd need to multiply the -x by the same LCD
$-x + \frac{9}{2} = \frac{3}{2}$
M. Frost
thing is, when i multiply the 6 it becomes 24 then i divide by 4 which brings me back to 6 again lol
If you multiply by LCD you can get $-2x + 9 = 3$
M. Frost
Once you subtract you get $-2x = -6$
M. Frost
This however does not end up meaning that x = 3/2 so I have no idea where your calculator got 3/2
it was actually pearson
idk either
anyways, heres a problem that I am currently on, I will do it first and then stop when i need help ->
x cancels out, 2y+2y=4y 0+3 = 3
4y=3
y= 3/4
Input y for any equation
-x +2(3/4) = 0
-x + 6/4 = 0
-x + 3/2 = 0
-x = 0 - 3/2
i assume a 0 + any fraction just equals the fraction?
or - equals negative
Yup
heres a method one of my friends showed me but I have no idea how he got the result prior.
but thats a separate so lets finish the first one
For any number x, 0+x=x
so basically its 3/2
so
x = 3/2
now we need Y
input x
3/2 + 2y = 3
subtract 3/2 from both sides
2y = 3 - 3/2
convert with LCD
2y = 3/2 - 3/2
??
Not quite
You can't divide that 3 by 2 without also doing so with everything else in the equation
so here I would multiply by the lcd
So if you turn 3 into 3/2, you also need to divide 2y by 2 and -3/2 by 2
Yeah you could multiply everything by 2 to get rid of the fraction
Not dumb, just learning 🙂
Yeah nobody's dumb in math, we're all just constantly learning new things
so y= 3/4 x = 3/2
,w 3/2 + 2y = 3
Looks good to me
however this was really easy matter of fact
let me go back to one of the problems I had rough time in'
Fractions take some getting used to but once you get them down they're pretty easygoing
I prefer them over decimals at this point
-x + 10(5/4) = 10
10(5)/4 = 50/4
-x + 50/4 = 10
Multiply each term by the LCD
-4x + 50 = 40
subtract 50
-4x = 10
divide by -4
x = -10/4 or -5/2
x = -5/2
how did the picture show me a positive and i got a negative

$-x+18(5/4)=20
aww i cant run that cmd
-x+18(5/4)=20
18(5)/4 = 90/4 -> 45/2
-x + 45/2 = 20
Multiply the LCD
-2x + 45 = 20
-2x = 20 - 45
-2x = -25
x = -25/2
opp i did something wrong
ooo did not multiply the 20 by 2
-2x = 40 - 45
-2x = -5
x = 5/2

LETS GO BBABY

however I am still confused on the negative there, when in the image it shows a positive
ohhhhhhhh 40-50 = -10 not 10
-4x = -10
x = -10/-4 or 5/2
im genius today
im legit just solving my own problems
rn
@plush roost Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @plush roost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could anyone mind help walking me through how to do this so i can do the rest ?
something isnt a function if a single x value corresponds to 2 distinct f(x) values
eg, circle equations arent functions
hm okay
what do you mean 2 distinct F(x) values?
are you talking about the second and third box?
im speaking generally, if you have a function f(x)
if you input some x and you can get two distinct values back, then that isnt a function
oh i see
2 distinct values means 2 values that arent the same
so if you put something in x and it comes with 1 value then its a function?
if only one value corresponds to each x, then yeah
another one i missed, it must be defined for every element in its domain
so yeah youre on the right path
0
is it?
im not sure... wive been very behind in my class lol
oh
,calc 5/0
Result:
Infinity
yes
ah okay that makes a bit more sense
so its asking me to put in numbers to make it not be a function correct?
so like with this one i would want x to be something thatll not be a function when sqr?
yeah I guess they're asking when it's undefined
if with this question they're working within the real numbers when x is less than 0 it would be undefined
so x = 0 with this one too because you cant sqrt 0?
you can do sqrt 0
oh
does it say they're working in real numbers?
Why is f not a function from R to R if