#help-27

1 messages · Page 113 of 1

hybrid snow
#

It's legit just manipulation

quasi wasp
#

I just don’t understand how it got to that form in the first place

hybrid snow
#

I'm turning x^2 into -kx^2 + (1+k)x^2

#

If you do the algebra, they're the exact same thing

quasi wasp
#

Yeah so why has that happened. Im sorry I’m just not getting that part

hybrid snow
#

Well it's because I notice that (x-k) * x^2 = x^3 - kx^2

#

So I take -kx^2 from x^2

hybrid snow
#

To prove they're equal: -kx^2 + (1+k)x^2 = (1+k-k)x^2 = 1x^2 = x^2

#

But tbh that should be evident by the time you're doing polynomial division

quasi wasp
#

So I just looked at the solution and they approached it a whole different way, which I should’ve noticed at the start but failed to.

(X-k) is a factor of f(x)
F(k) = 0 => k^3 + k^2 - k + k = 0
K^3 + k^2 = 0
K^2(k+1) = 0
K = 0 or -1

devout snowBOT
#

@quasi wasp Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

raven orchid
#

every picture I draw of this supports the theorem, but I'm not sure how to start to prove it or how I would use the endpoint conditions

manic condor
#

Try considering a function h(x) = f(x) - g(x)

#

After that, mean value theorem is your friend.

devout snowBOT
#

@raven orchid Has your question been resolved?

raven orchid
devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @raven orchid

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

humble cobalt
#

Kinda confused as to how the 13 ends up negative

humble cobalt
#

For more clarity it’s a conics question

#

Changing from standerd form to general and that’s a picture of the answer key

topaz beacon
#

Looks like the author made a mistake

humble cobalt
#

Kinda confusing cause that’s a website which has answers like detailed, but the textbook key has the same answer

#

Ima ask someone

#

Yesterday I spent hours tryna figure a question jus for the teacher to tell me to try graphing it because the function is too high degree and we haven’t learning that

devout snowBOT
#

@humble cobalt Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stray nova
devout snowBOT
stray nova
#

How do I solve this problem?

brittle burrow
#

$|2u-3v|=\sqrt{|2u-3v|^2}=\sqrt{(2u-3v)\cdot(2u-3v)}$

woven radishBOT
#

chlamydia

brittle burrow
#

do you see how this works?

neat solstice
#

@stray nova
what chlamydia did is use the definition of the norm you are using
square it, then take the root
they then rewrote the squaring as multiplying it with itself

what we can then do is outmultiply the brackets
this will give us terms like u^2, u * v and v^2
the u^2 and v^2 are easily solved by using the definition of your norm again
for the u * v part, you will want to look at the definition of the scalarproducts

stray nova
#

ohhhh I see

neat solstice
#

there is an alternative to this, but this way is by far the easiest

neat solstice
#

the alternative would be to notice that the exact orientation of the vectors is irelevant
thus we can just choose u=(1,0,0)
then we can look for a vector v=(x,0,0) such that the angle will be pi/3
then we can just calculate 2u-3v

neat solstice
#

a theorem i just made up

#

intuition basically

#

we will get a specific vector for 2u-3v which depends on our choice of u and v
however the length of that vector will always be the same if |u|, |v| and the angle are the same as was given

stray nova
neat solstice
#

yes

stray nova
#

so we have two conditions, || v || =2, and the angle between them must be pi/3

#

I meant to type | | v | |

devout snowBOT
#

@stray nova Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tardy fossil
#

hello, i have a question on algebra and just need some help

main gull
tardy fossil
#

well, its not really a question, i just need help understanding the concept if that makes sense?

main gull
#

Then post it what it is

#

It's not like the people here have telepathy and can read your mind

tardy fossil
#

im sorry, im new to askin for help

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tardy fossil

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

next dock
#

why dividing distance by time gives speed. please help me imagine the process of dividing distance by time

jaunty mantle
#

What is speed

main gull
next dock
#

i don't know

jaunty mantle
#

How would you define speed?

next dock
#

i'm trying to define

#

i can define distance but not the other way around

jaunty mantle
#

Well what’s distance

next dock
#

speed times time

jaunty mantle
#

(This is actually a bit of a tricky question)

next dock
#

what do you mean

jaunty mantle
#

The distance is something that measures a property of 2 points

next dock
#

okay

jaunty mantle
#

Does that make sense?

next dock
#

.___________.

#

like this?

jaunty mantle
#

Kinda

next dock
#

oaky

jaunty mantle
#

If I gave you 2 point let’s say your home and your school

#

I can ask you about the distance between those 2 places

next dock
#

because we count the distance between my home and my school by arbitrary units that we made up ie meters

jaunty mantle
#

Sure

next dock
#

right?

jaunty mantle
#

Well the idea is that to go from point A to point B takes some time

#

Let’s say the points were 50 units apart

#

If it takes you 1 hour to get from A to B

#

Then every 1 hour you can travel 50 units

#

Does that make sense?

next dock
#

kinda

#

i'm trying to comprehend how are they connected to each other

jaunty mantle
#

Well if I asked you, how many times can you travel from A to B then to A then to B etc

#

In 3 hours

#

What would you say?

next dock
#

" how many times can you travel from A to B then to A then to B etc" can you elaborate this?

jaunty mantle
#

Like go back and forth between A and B

next dock
#

i would say 6 times but i wouldn't say that i understand what i'm doing

jaunty mantle
#

Well it takes 1 hour to get from A to B

next dock
#

then 3 times

jaunty mantle
#

Ah

#

But why 3

next dock
#

i'm thinking

jaunty mantle
#

You can try to describe it with words

#

The important thing here is to try express your thoughts

next dock
#

because we counted |AB| |BA| |AB| with 1 hour units and each distance was 1 hour unit?

jaunty mantle
#

Aha!

#

What if I told you it takes 1.5 hours to go from A to B

#

And I still only had 3 hours

next dock
#

yes it is 2

#

so

#

speed is counting travelled distance by time

#

is that right?

jaunty mantle
#

Kinda

#

We want to measure how far we can travel per some time

next dock
#

we defined traveled distance by hours, then when dividing that distance by time we were counting by that time unit?

jaunty mantle
#

Yes

#

That’s what “per” means

#

When we say 60kmph

#

That’s saying 60 km per hour

#

Or 60km/hr

#

Or every hour we travel 60km

next dock
#

4 cookies per person

#

8 cookies per 2 people

#

.... ....

#

this is so hard

jaunty mantle
#

What’s wrong with that

next dock
#

with what?

jaunty mantle
#

With what you just said

next dock
#

is something wrong?

jaunty mantle
#

Nothing is wrong

next dock
#

i don't know what's wrong

jaunty mantle
#

But you said it was hard

next dock
#

yes it is

jaunty mantle
#

Which part of that was hard?

next dock
#

trying to understand division

jaunty mantle
#

(I’m not saying it should be easy, just wondering where you are having difficulty)

#

Ah

#

Do you understand division in other contexts?

next dock
#

like what?

jaunty mantle
#

Like splitting a pizza between people

next dock
#

yes i can understand splitting a pizza

jaunty mantle
#

Do you also get that division is like the inverse of multiplication?

next dock
#

i know but i don't get

jaunty mantle
#

$\div(*(a, b), a)=b$

woven radishBOT
#

Frosst

jaunty mantle
#

Mhmm never mind

next dock
#

what do you want me to do

jaunty mantle
#

You get what you started

next dock
#

yes that's right

jaunty mantle
#

So in a sense it’s doing the opposite of multiplication

next dock
#

yes, i know that

#

but why "per"?

jaunty mantle
#

That’s just the word we use

#

“How much are the ice cream?”

“They are 3 dollar each
This is the same as saying
“They are 3 dollars per ice cream”

next dock
#

why is it a division?

#

dollars/ice cream?

jaunty mantle
#

Yes

#

Precisely that

next dock
#

yes but i can't make a connection between (dollars/ice cream?) and (why is it a division?)

jaunty mantle
#

Because every 3 dollars gets you an ice cream

#

If I change the question

#

“How many ice cream can I buy per dollar?”

#

Now I want to know ice cream/dollar

#

I also just noticed I’ve used ice cream subconsciously because of your name lol

next dock
#

lol

jaunty mantle
#

Or 1 ice cream per 3 dollars

#

$\frac{0.333…}{1} = \frac{1}{3}$

woven radishBOT
#

Frosst

next dock
#

okay

#

you divided 1 by 3 on top left

#

and divided 3 by 3 on bottom left?

jaunty mantle
#

No I just went $\frac{0.333…}{1}=0.333…=\frac{1}{3}$

woven radishBOT
#

Frosst

next dock
#

yes

#

can't say i get what division means

jaunty mantle
#

Can you give an example where you don’t understand the meaning

next dock
#

okay

next dock
#

or binqilin i would say

jaunty mantle
#

What’s wrong with that

next dock
jaunty mantle
#

Ok let me give you a perhaps weird example

#

What is force

next dock
#

i don't know

#

wait

#

tiny atoms coming together

jaunty mantle
#

Have you seen F = ma before

next dock
#

yes countless times

jaunty mantle
#

What’s m measured in (typically)

next dock
#

kg in europe

jaunty mantle
#

What about a

next dock
#

m/s

jaunty mantle
#

How does it make sense to multiply kilograms with meters divided by seconds

#

It might be a useless thing to think about

next dock
#

mass go big, mass hit big

jaunty mantle
#

But this kind of measurement happens to be what force means

jaunty mantle
next dock
#

ah yes

#

m/s was speed

#

or velocity?

jaunty mantle
#

It’s meaningless unless it tells us something

#

Dollars/ice cream tells us how much it costs to buy ice cream

#

kgm/s² tells us how much force something applies

#

If we want to measure work

#

We multiply F by distance

#

If we apply a force over some distance we do some work

#

In the same sense “if we apply some speed over some time we travel some distance”

#

It’s a very rough analogy but maybe it helps you understand the connections

next dock
#

why it is multiplication?

jaunty mantle
#

It just happens to be

next dock
#

why not force + distance

jaunty mantle
#

Because it doesn’t align with the real world

next dock
#

"for 5 unit distance we applied 1 unit force"

#

force+force+force+force

jaunty mantle
#

“We applied 1 unit of force over 5 units of distance”

#

That’s usually the way we phrase it

jaunty mantle
next dock
#

now all i need to do is understanding the inverse of this

#

aaah

jaunty mantle
#

Well what if I asked

#

How much force do I need to apply over some distance to do X work

#

I give you the distance and the work

#

How do you find the force

next dock
#

w = f.d

#

w/d = f

jaunty mantle
#

We usually use s for distance

jaunty mantle
# next dock w = f.d

It’s also a bit wrong but I don’t think the difference matters in our context

next dock
#

yes you are right

#

what's wrong

#

w = f * s

jaunty mantle
#

$W=\int_CF\cdot ,ds$

#

It’s more like this

next dock
#

what is c

jaunty mantle
#

The path

#

But honestly it’s not really the point of our discussion

#

If C is just some path from s = 0 to s = s then it’s just W = Fs

#

Fuck

woven radishBOT
#

Frosst

jaunty mantle
#

It was weird when I started writing it

#

Or rather $W=\int_{s=0}^{s=d}F\cdot , ds = [Fs]_{s=0}^{s=d} = Fd - 0 = Fd$

woven radishBOT
#

Frosst

jaunty mantle
#

So if we move from 0 to d (a force F applied over a distance d)

#

Then we did work equal to Fd

jaunty mantle
next dock
#

yes i remember from college

jaunty mantle
#

Anyhow it’s not really the point we’re focusing on

jaunty mantle
next dock
#

well i just did algebra...

#

doesn't mean that i get it

#

work divided by distances

jaunty mantle
next dock
#

1 work = |....| distance

#

i'm trying to visualise distance and work

#

in my mind

#

trying to visualise what would work per distance look like to be exact.

jaunty mantle
#

Work might be a bit abstract to think about

next dock
#

everything is abstract

#

okay if we have 100 human

#

10 humans*

#

and if they are paired with each other

#

how many group we have per pair

#

one pair is 2 humans

#

aah

#

this is where i got lost

#

group per pair

#

is there any division contexts than these?

jaunty mantle
#

But it might be useless to know

next dock
#

ask what about it?

jaunty mantle
#

There are 5 groups

#

There are 2 people per group

#

Or 1 group per 2 people

#

2 people is a pair

#

1 group per pair

#

Group per pair means how many pairs of people are in a group?

jaunty mantle
#

You get 1 group per pair

next dock
#

but we have 10 people

#

why didn't we divide

jaunty mantle
#

But groups per pair answers the question: “How many groups can you make with 1 pair of people?”

next dock
#

can you give an easy example about permutation that includes division?

jaunty mantle
#

Why permutation

#

Permutation is usually not simple lol

next dock
#

okay then

jaunty mantle
#

Combinatorics is usually easier

next dock
#

maybe i'm mixing them

jaunty mantle
#

How many ways are there to pull 4 aces from a deck of cards?

next dock
#

1 way

jaunty mantle
#

Actually that’s probably too hard too

#

How many ways are there to pull 3 aces from 4 cards from a deck of cards

#

That’s better

#

The division in these question takes care of “over counting”

#

Honestly these are pretty shit examples 😦

#

I can’t think of a good one on the spot

next dock
#

my brain is about to explode

#

"PAPAYA" how many meaningless or meaningful words can we write, using each word each time

#

this requires division

#

nevermind this is too hard for me

jaunty mantle
#

Ah

#

That’s a good example

#

The A’s are indistinguishable

#

So whether the first, second or third A goes anywhere

#

It’s the same permutation

next dock
#

no i'm serious this is like phd level division nevermind

#

okay what about interpolation factor

#

x-x0/x1-x0

#

x0------x--------------x1

#

x0------x and
x0---------------------x1

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @next dock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

next dock
#

.reopen

devout snowBOT
#

next dock
#

thank you for your efforts @jaunty mantle

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @next dock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stray socket
devout snowBOT
stray socket
#

i need to be taught 85,86,87

rapid merlin
#

What are the properties of two parallel lines on a graph?

#

@stray socket ?

stray socket
#

sorry

#

the same b value?

rapid merlin
#

You mean the same slope ?

stray socket
#

yes

#

same slope different b is what i meant

rapid merlin
#

Ok so get the function in the (a 85)
To be
y = mx + c
Form

#

Done?
@savageben.123#4537

stray socket
#

is it

#

y=1/4x+1

#

i was working it out

rapid merlin
#

Umm
You need to divide the 4 to the whole right side
Not just x

#

It will be like this
$$y=\frac14x+\frac14$$

woven radishBOT
#

Sherif Player

rapid merlin
#

Ok ?

stray socket
#

got it yeah

rapid merlin
#

So the slope is 1/4

stray socket
#

i messed that up but i understand

rapid merlin
#

Now just get the derivative of the function and equation it to 1/4

stray socket
#

the deriv is just e^x right

rapid merlin
#

Yeah

stray socket
#

what would i do after getting deriv'

rapid merlin
#

Equate it to 1/4 and get the x and y values of each point that satisfies the slope

#

As you need to get a point in the derivative that its slope is equal to 1/4

stray socket
#

so itd be e^x=1/4?

#

im not following on this part

rapid merlin
# stray socket so itd be e^x=1/4?

Yes
Now just get the x value that satisfies this condition
And then substitute it to the original function to get the y value of the point that satisfies the conditions

stray socket
#

the x value that satisfies

rapid merlin
#

Do you know how to solve for x there ?

stray socket
#

no

rapid merlin
#

Did you get to know the logarithmic functions?

stray socket
#

no im afraid not

rapid merlin
#

Like
$$\log_2(8)$$
$$\ln(e^2)$$
Nothing of those ?

woven radishBOT
#

Sherif Player

rapid merlin
#

@stray socket ?

stray socket
#

no i havent seen those before

rapid merlin
#

Then you need to learn about them to solve 85 and 86

stray socket
#

would it be ln1/4

#

x=ln(1/4)

rapid merlin
#

Did you just get that from an online calculator?

stray socket
#

no i looked at the notes from today

rapid merlin
#

So you learned about it today ?

stray socket
#

yes and no. he gave us 1 example using e^x

#

but in a different scenario

rapid merlin
stray socket
#

was it right?

#

anyway. when i get my x=ln(1/4) do i sub it into the original y=1/4x+1/4

rapid merlin
#

Yeah it was right but I am afraid that you just don't understand why it is the solution to it and how to get its value by your self in the future

stray socket
#

well my exam is tommow so i have to learn it by tonight

rapid merlin
stray socket
#

but i need to know how to solve the 85,86,87

rapid merlin
#

This is a really good unit there to learn about it

stray socket
#

well ill be checking it out tonight

rapid merlin
stray socket
rapid merlin
#

What will you get when you substitute it to the original function

#

@stray socket ?
It should be easy

stray socket
#

ln1/4/4+1/4

#

or no?

rapid merlin
#

I said original function before taking the derivative

stray socket
#

ln(1/4)-4y=1

#

?

rapid merlin
#

We knew its slope so just throw it out of the window

stray socket
#

e^x?

rapid merlin
#

Wait
Do you understand what derivative mean?

stray socket
#

is that what your talking about

#

yes

rapid merlin
#

Like you now that it is about taking the slope of the function at any point x

stray socket
#

e^ln(1/4)

#

yeah i understand the derivatives

#

is there a way to like call you? if not its fine its just hard for me to type

rapid merlin
#

So to get the a line parallel to that line equation we need to find a point where the slope of the function equal the slope of the line
So we took the derivative of the function
F'(x) = e^x
And we equted it to the slope of the line
e^x = 1/4
To get
X = ln(1/4)

Now we need to know the y value of that point so we will substitute x back to the original function

F(x) = e^x
e^ln(1/4)

To get the value of y

#

That will output the same value 1/4

#

So the point will be (ln(1/4), 1/4)

#

So now you got a slope and a point right

#

Just make the equation of the line that has that slope and passes through the point

#

And you did it

#

@stray socket
All good ?

stray socket
#

Is this right.

#

?

#

wait whys it ln4+1 and not 1/4

#

did i do something wrong

#

oh i think i get it

rapid merlin
#

It should be
ln(4) not ln(4+1)

stray socket
#

okay gotcha

#

thank you

#

on 86 it gives u 2 points so would u sub in the x value into e^x?

rapid merlin
#

So you know that
$$\ln(\frac14) = -\ln(4)$$

woven radishBOT
#

Sherif Player

rapid merlin
#

If you didn't see it

stray socket
#

didnt see it good catch

#

would we have to make our why value 0?

rapid merlin
stray socket
#

to find the origin

rapid merlin
#

So in your opinion what would you need to do

rapid merlin
#

Come on tell me that you know what is the origin point

stray socket
#

i thought the origin was 0 on both axis

rapid merlin
#

Yes

stray socket
#

like point 0,0

rapid merlin
#

Yes

stray socket
#

how would i go about finding it?

#

id have to make a point 0,0

#

im going to move onto 86

rapid merlin
#

Sorry for being late

stray socket
#

no problem. im just preparing for my test

rapid merlin
#

@stray socket
First do you know a way to Express the equation of a line of some point in a function by knowing that its x co-ordinates is a and its y co-ordinates is f(a)

#

If you don't know this is a quick way just remember this rule
(y-f(a)) = f'(a) * (x - a)

stray socket
#

no i didnt know that

rapid merlin
#

This works for every function

#

If it is continuous in the point you are doing that of course

stray socket
#

and thats the equation of a line?

rapid merlin
stray socket
#

okay gothca

#

im writing that down

rapid merlin
#

Now in our case
f(a) is just e^a
Right?

stray socket
#

your doing 86 right?

rapid merlin
#

85b

stray socket
#

yes then

rapid merlin
#

Then what is f'(a)

stray socket
#

would it just be e^a

rapid merlin
#

Yes

stray socket
#

wait so what is e^a in our problem

rapid merlin
#

It is just the value of a function knowing that its x coordinates is x
Meaning it is the value of y in the graph of the function

#

Now we want to get a line equation that passes through 0,0

stray socket
#

okay

#

would we use the equation u showed me

#

i dont think he taught us this way. or he may not have taught us at all because none of this is familiar

rapid merlin
#

Yes we just want to first separate it to the
y = mx + c
Form

#

To make it easier on us
So here we need c to be 0

stray socket
#

c?

#

oh i see

rapid merlin
#

Ok

#

$$y- e^a = e^ax-e^aa$$

woven radishBOT
#

Sherif Player

rapid merlin
#

$$y=e^ax+e^a-e^aa$$

woven radishBOT
#

Sherif Player

rapid merlin
#

So now we got it to the form

#

So now you should know which part we want to be zero here

stray socket
#

a?

rapid merlin
#

No

rapid merlin
stray socket
#

do u mean which constant should be

rapid merlin
stray socket
#

if we are trying to get mx+b

#

everything to the right of the addition sign

#

needs to go right

rapid merlin
#

Correct

#

So just say that
$$e^a - e^aa=0$$
And solve for a

woven radishBOT
#

Sherif Player

stray socket
#

do i sub numbers in yet

#

or get the a to other side

rapid merlin
#

It is easy to solve tho
Just take e^a * a to the right side then divide by e^a

#

@stray socket
All good ?

stray socket
#

e^a/e^a

#

=a

rapid merlin
#

Yeah but you can simplfie it more

stray socket
#

a=1? or is that wrong lol

rapid merlin
#

Yes

stray socket
#

hell yea

rapid merlin
#

It is correct

#

Now just substitute it to the original line equation

#

To get the line equation

stray socket
#

which ones the original. the one u showed me

#

(y-f(a)) = f'(a) * (x - a)

rapid merlin
rapid merlin
rapid merlin
#

Both of them will work

#

So did you got the final line equation?

stray socket
#

y=e^1x

#

is e^1 just e

#

so itd be y=ex

rapid merlin
#

Yeah

#

That's correct

stray socket
#

awesome

#

ill have to get some more help on that before my test tommorow

#

i learn much better in person

rapid merlin
#

Now to 86?

stray socket
#

think im gonna do some easier ones that i also need to know

#

il lsend u a pic

rapid merlin
#

86 actually uses the same equation I told you above

stray socket
#

52-56 will be on test

#

so 86 is similar?

rapid merlin
#

Not really but it uses it in another way

stray socket
#

on 52, 4sin^2x

#

what rule would be used for the derivative

rapid merlin
#

What do you think?

stray socket
#

would that be multiplication rule

#

uv^prime+vuprime

rapid merlin
#

Yeah that works

stray socket
#

let me work it out some

rapid merlin
#

But there is another way
Which is

stray socket
#

chain rule?

rapid merlin
#

$$\frac{d}{dx}F^n(x) = F^{n-1}(x) F'(x)$$

woven radishBOT
#

Sherif Player

stray socket
#

os tjat chain rule?

rapid merlin
#

Yes

stray socket
#

would the 4 be considered outter function

rapid merlin
#

It is a constant that you can ignore and multiply by it in after getting the derivative

stray socket
#

is it -4cos^2x

rapid merlin
#

No

stray socket
#

what would be considered the outter function of sin^2x

rapid merlin
#

$$4 * sin^2(x)$$
$$4 * 2 * sin(x) * cos(x)$$

woven radishBOT
#

Sherif Player

rapid merlin
#

Like this

stray socket
#

okay i see now

#

so it would be 8sinxcosx

rapid merlin
#

Yes
Then substitute the point

stray socket
#

8sinpi/6cospi/6

rapid merlin
#

Yeah what is the value

#

Remember that this is in rad

stray socket
#

would i need the unit circle?

rapid merlin
#

Not really

stray socket
#

what would u do

rapid merlin
#

If you remember them

#

π/6 is the same as 30 degree

stray socket
#

1/2?

#

would it be 8x1/2xsqr3/2

rapid merlin
#

Yeah

#

Which will result in?

stray socket
#

can i not leave it like that?

rapid merlin
#

You can but you can also simplify to be more easier
Like
2√3

stray socket
#

ohh gotcha

#

okay

#

so would that be the slope?

rapid merlin
#

Yeah

#

56 is not hard

stray socket
#

can i leave it in y-y-1=m(x-x1)

#

because i wont know how to simplify that tmr

rapid merlin
#

You can

stray socket
#

good

#

im gonna try 53

#

quotient rule first right

#

y=2x-1

#

did u work it out?

#

it says the answer is y=-1

rapid merlin
#

Yeah because you should have got a 0 instead of 2

stray socket
#

i see why now

#

messed up a neg. sign

rapid merlin
stray socket
#

wait actually i dont see my mistake

#

can u find hte4 problem?

rapid merlin
woven radishBOT
rapid merlin
#

When you substituted zero there how did you get 2?

stray socket
#

1--1

#

am i missing something

#

2/1

rapid merlin
#

Zero times something is zero

  • zero times something which is zero
stray socket
#

oh i see

#

i forgot to multipy by the zeros

#

silly mistake

#

im gonna try 54

rapid merlin
#

@stray socket sorry for that but I gotta sleep now so just use helpers tag here if you need any help

stray socket
#

okay thanks very much

devout snowBOT
#

@stray socket Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vivid quiver
#

@drifting torrenter How do I solve the problem: "too+too+spot what is the value of "t"" I don't even know where to start?

devout snowBOT
main gull
#

That makes no sense, what you have typed

vivid quiver
#

ok just a sec

devout snowBOT
#

@vivid quiver Has your question been resolved?

karmic prairie
vivid quiver
#

No

#

Idk how it works but I got it in a test so it must be possible

karmic prairie
#

are these variables?

vivid quiver
#

Do you mean as in the each hold a specific number value?

karmic prairie
#

yes

vivid quiver
#

Yes it is

timid whale
#

huh

#

thst looks to be impossible if they are all single digits

#

2x+1 can never have same parity as x

vivid quiver
#

@timid whale thats odd

#

I'll have to ask my math teacher about it

timid whale
#

its certainly impossiblr

vivid quiver
#

Because she says it's possible

timid whale
#

either that

vivid quiver
#

So idk

timid whale
#

if theres no carry over in first step then second should give t aswell

#

and if there is max carry is 1

#

so 2x+1 should give 10+x

#

wait lol

#

9

#

anyway

#

its doable im just dumb

#

o is 9

#

after that ig u can solve

#

t is 8

vivid quiver
#

Ok

#

Thanks so much

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vivid quiver

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

glad glen
#

Help I'm having a mental health crisis
I just learned about this python package called sympy that lets you do all sorts of symbolic math
like differential equations and stuff
why am I trying to become a physicist when a calculator can do everything I could ever want to do

glad glen
#

can I have a reason that I need to understand how to math when I could just type it in a calculator

#

whats the point of doing anything other than compsci at this point

livid geyser
#

gl typing proofs into a calculator

#

There technically are formal proof verifiers but

wooden zodiac
#

Or finding new theories lol

livid geyser
#

They are messy af

wooden zodiac
#

Physicists' sole job is not computing stuff lol

glad glen
#

I get that the conceptual parts of the math is important

#

but why am I killing myself trying to understand DE

#

when I could just plug it in

#

a caluclator

livid geyser
#

oh intro DE is a useless class in 99% of schools tbh

#

Needs more proofs

glad glen
#

Does physics even use proofs

livid geyser
#

yes

#

Witten is a physicist and has a fields medal

glad glen
#

oh really

livid geyser
#

ye

glad glen
#

hmmmmm

#

ok

#

im still sad

livid geyser
#

But yeah intro DE is a joke class that they make u go through most of the time cus idek

#

some top schools don't even have it as a requirement for math major nowadays

glad glen
#

oh

#

well it still seems important to physics tho

livid geyser
#

DEs are very important

#

but intro DE isn't devastation

glad glen
#

am I just failing at it because I skipped past calc 3

livid geyser
#

hmm it shouldn't require Calc 3 stuff hmmCat

glad glen
#

well I guess im just stupid

livid geyser
#

Nah

#

Maybe ur just not the best at computations stuff

#

But we have computers for that nowadays

#

Like u pointed out

glad glen
#

yeah ur right

#

I guess its just been a long day

#

thanks

livid geyser
#

np

glad glen
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @glad glen

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

shut elbow
devout snowBOT
shut elbow
#

i was wondering why theta is at that angle

supple knot
devout snowBOT
#

@shut elbow Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @shut elbow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

shut elbow
#

not sure if my work is right for this question

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

woven citrus
devout snowBOT
woven citrus
#

What do i do i am stuck for 20 minuted

rapid merlin
woven radishBOT
rapid merlin
#

What do you know about solving by substitution?

#

Nvm

woven citrus
#

I cant understand substitution

rapid merlin
#

Try getting the value of y in terms of x in the first equation and substitute it to the second equation

woven citrus
#

Yes i tried and it didnt work

rapid merlin
#

Or if you want to avoid square roots
You can get it from the second one and substitute it to the first one

woven citrus
#

Okay brb let me try it out

rapid merlin
#

Did you got
$$y=\frac{23-x}{1+x}$$
$$x^2 + \frac{23^2-46x+x^2}{x^2+2x+1} = 34$$
$$\frac{x^2(x^2+2x+1) +x^2 - 46x + 23^2}{x^2+2x-1} = 34$$
$$x^4+2x^3+2x^2-46x+23^2=34x^2+68x-34$$
$$x^4+2x^3 -32x^2 -114x + 563 = 0$$

woven radishBOT
#

Sherif Player

rapid merlin
#

,calc 23*23 +34

woven radishBOT
#

Result:

563
rapid merlin
#

,calc 114/2

woven radishBOT
#

Result:

57
rapid merlin
#

,calc 563/114

woven radishBOT
#

Result:

4.9385964912281
rapid merlin
#

,wolf solve x^4 + 2x^3 -32x^2 -114x + 563

woven radishBOT
rapid merlin
#

@woven citrus
Found an easier way yeah

devout snowBOT
#

@woven citrus Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @woven citrus

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

opal birch
#

Helllo i need help with something

devout snowBOT
hushed wraith
opal birch
#

wait lemme send

#

I need to explain what Summation of a product is

#

and make 2 examples on how to do it

devout snowBOT
#

@opal birch Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

amber blade
#

How can a) possibly be a d-system if u(X) is not promised to be v(X)? where X is the whole space

stone stump
#

that is indeed strange

devout snowBOT
#

@amber blade Has your question been resolved?

amber blade
#

well I just ignored it for now

#

onto reproving the monotone class theorem

devout snowBOT
#

@amber blade Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

viscid snow
#

TRASLATED: Determine by calculating the interior angles if the triangle with vertices: ... Is a rectangle one

viscid snow
#

help, where to start

#

@wooden veldt could u help me?

devout snowBOT
#

@viscid snow Has your question been resolved?

supple knot
devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

royal drift
#

x^2013 + 1/x^2013 = 2. Find x^2022 + 1/x^2022

lilac mango
#

not sure if theres a fast way

#

but

#

you can let u = x^2013

#

so u + 1/u = 2

royal drift
#

i can provide you with options

lilac mango
#

go on

royal drift
#

the options are : 0, 1, 2 and 4

#

It must be any one of these

lilac mango
#

well

#

if you have

#

u = x^2013

#

and u + 1/u = 2

#

theres a bit of an obvious solution

#

for u which u can then use to solve for x

royal drift
#

Alright, ill try

lilac mango
#

have you worked out the value of u?

royal drift
#

yeah, u is 1

lilac mango
#

yep

#

so if you have

#

u = x^2013

#

1 = x^2013

#

so what would x be

royal drift
#

then the correct answer is also 1

#

sorry, 2

lilac mango
#

yep

#

great

#

👍🏻

royal drift
#

thanky you very much

lilac mango
#

no worries

royal drift
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @royal drift

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sinful inlet
devout snowBOT
sinful inlet
#

This is what I have so far

devout snowBOT
#

@sinful inlet Has your question been resolved?

sinful inlet
#

<@&286206848099549185>

devout snowBOT
#

@sinful inlet Has your question been resolved?

sinful inlet
#

<@&286206848099549185>

devout snowBOT
#

@sinful inlet Has your question been resolved?

sinful inlet
#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sinful inlet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

west tinsel
#

Hi

devout snowBOT
west tinsel
#

The product rule says that ... Explain why ....

#

I haven't begun yet because I don't know how but I have an idea that it might have something to do with the constant rule?

lone ravine
west tinsel
#

I need to figure it out

lone ravine
#

Nice, that is how I started my oral exam today 🙂

west tinsel
#

in uni?

lone ravine
#

How about bringing the two integrals on one side?

lone ravine
west tinsel
#

nice. first year?

lone ravine
#

Finals over first and second semester

lone ravine
west tinsel
#

Yep

#

now we can put them together

#

nice¨

lone ravine
#

Yes 🙂

#

And then you just apply the identity above and you're done

west tinsel
#

nice

#

I didnt even know you could put them together like that until 10 seconds ago

#

I thought it would make sense and I guess it was right xD

lone ravine
#

That's just the linearity of the integral

neat solstice
#

can't we just differentiate everything?

#

that way, we will use the product rule and the fact that d/dx(integral(f))=f

#

assuming that f is integradable of course

lone ravine
#

Yes, that's another way of doing it !

devout snowBOT
#

@west tinsel Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @west tinsel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

west tinsel
devout snowBOT
west tinsel
#

Use partiel integration on f(x) = x and g(x) = 1/(1+x^2)^n to realize that:...

#

the differentiated of 1/(1+x^2)^n is really insane, I dont know if its necessary for me to calculate it here

neon aspen
#

it's not that insane

west tinsel
#

How would you do it?

#

And is it really necessary?

neon aspen
#

yes

west tinsel
#

shit

#

okt

#

okay

west tinsel
#

by hand

#

idk where to go from here or even if I did it wrong

#

<@&286206848099549185>

devout snowBOT
#

@west tinsel Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#

@west tinsel Has your question been resolved?

ancient ravine
#

,rotate

woven radishBOT
devout snowBOT
#

@west tinsel Has your question been resolved?

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sharp wigeon
devout snowBOT
sharp wigeon
#

is their a way to solve this? very confused

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sharp wigeon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

sharp wigeon
#

.CLOSE

#

.clsoe

#

.close

devout snowBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

misty dirge
devout snowBOT
misty dirge
#

I'm unsure if this is the correct approach

#

as i've also asked for AI's opinion and it gives something quite different althought similar taste

livid geyser
winter patrol
#

don't use chatgpt for math

misty dirge
#

XD

rough swan
#

$\lim_{n\to\infty} \tfrac{f(n)}{g(n)} = ?$
$\lim_{n\to\infty} \tfrac{g(n)}{f(n)} = ?$

woven radishBOT
#

YouShouldBeHigher

rough swan
#

do you know Stirling's approximation to the factorial?

misty dirge
#

i think f(n) is still faster right

#

i do not

rough swan
#

ok so for large n, $n^44^n >> n^33^n$, follow?

woven radishBOT
#

YouShouldBeHigher

rough swan
#

means "is very much bigger than"

misty dirge
rough swan
#

so we can ignore the lesser term

misty dirge
#

ye we just look at n^4 * 4^n right

#

i put 4^n which is incorrect? should be the whole large expression

rough swan
misty dirge
#

which is n^4 * 4^n

rough swan
#

y

#

$f(n)=2^n * \tfrac{n!}{3!(n-3)!} = \tfrac{2^n*n(n-1)(n-2)}{6}$

woven radishBOT
#

YouShouldBeHigher

misty dirge
#

yes, and the numerator simplifies to 2^n * n^3 because we take the largest expression in the sum of expression of n(n-1)(n-1)?

rough swan
#

if we multiply out the factors, we will get a cubic polynomial n^3+...

#

when n is large, the n^3 term will dominate the lesser terms

misty dirge
#

In this case would we just be comparing degrees instead of factorials vs exponentials speed

rough swan
#

so now we only need consider

$\tfrac{f(n)}{g(n)} \approx \tfrac{2^nn^3}{6\sqrt{n^44^n}}$

woven radishBOT
#

YouShouldBeHigher

rough swan
#

ready^

#

simplfy

#

$\tfrac{f(n)}{g(n)} \approx \tfrac{2^nn^3}{6n^22^n}$

woven radishBOT
#

YouShouldBeHigher

misty dirge
#

infinity and 0 respectively?

rough swan
misty dirge
rough swan
#

np

misty dirge
#

i would just check for f(n)/g(n) and g(n)/f(n) right?

#

and then since f(n)/g(n) is infinity and g(n)/f(n) is 0

#

i can conclude that f(n) growsfaster

#

after simplifying with heuristics

rough swan
#

what if they had been constants?

#

f(n)/g(n)->3.14159

#

say?

misty dirge
#

either wouldn't be fast?

#

im not sure

#

it'd just be a difference in numbers but the ratio would remain the same?

rough swan
#

they grow proportionally to each other

#

f(n) ~ c*g(n) where c is a constant

#

ok, we good?

misty dirge
#

ye i think so

devout snowBOT
#

@misty dirge Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @misty dirge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

thorn birch
devout snowBOT
torn lagoon
#

try rewriting the fraction as a product of two

thorn birch
#

a product of 2?

thick inlet
#

hi

#

what DID I DO WRONG GUYSS

thorn birch
#

uh this is mine😭

#

u have to go to a new one

devout snowBOT
#

This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.

torn lagoon
#

yeah, you can split the fraction up into a product of two numbers

#

ill give you the first part of it -> (5/6) * (? / ?)

thick inlet
#

oops my bad

#

ill change it

thorn birch
#

would it be the cube roots?

torn lagoon
#

hint: cbrt(24/3) is the same as cbrt(24)/cbrt(3)

thorn birch
#

ok chbe root (24/3)

torn lagoon
#

ye

thorn birch
#

So (5/6) cuberoot(24/3)

torn lagoon
#

yes, being multiplied. you can simplify the cube root further

thorn birch
#

cube root of 24 and 3?

misty dirge
#

How can u split cube root 24 to simplify it?

torn lagoon
#

you have cbrt(24/3)

#

what is 24/3?

thorn birch
thorn birch
torn lagoon
#

if you have the cube root of (24/3), you can simplify the division in side. 24/3 is 8, so you would have the cube root of 8 or cbrt(8)

thorn birch
#

okay

torn lagoon
#

so your term now looks like (5 / 6) * cbrt(8)

thorn birch
#

okay

torn lagoon
#

do you know what number raised to the 3rd power is equal to 8?

#

or in other words, what is the cube root of 8?

thorn birch
#

3

#

uh

torn lagoon
#

it's actually 2, 2x2x2 = 8

#

oops

thorn birch
#

2 ?

torn lagoon
#

yes

thorn birch
#

yea

torn lagoon
#

so you should now have (5/6) * 2

thorn birch
#

okay

torn lagoon
#

one thing to note though is that you can only rewrite fractional roots like this if they have the same power (in this case, cbrt is power 3 root)

thorn birch
#

ok

torn lagoon
#

if you have sqrt(24)/cbrt(3), you would not be able to simplify any further

thorn birch
#

noticed

#

so A?

torn lagoon
#

what do you get when you do (5/6) * 2

#

that should be the answer

thorn birch
#

what is the star representing

misty dirge
#

Times

#

Right now u have 5 * 2 * cuberoot(3) / 6 * cuberoot(3)

#

U can simplify that

#

Anything divided by itself is what?

thorn birch
#

ur confusing me

#

can u just u like an x

#

so 5x2x cuberoot of 3/6

torn lagoon
#

its (5 / 6) x 2

#

you can write that as (5/6) + (5/6)

thorn birch
#

1.66666 ???? idk it came up with a bunch of 6

torn lagoon
#

you can do it without a calculator

thorn birch
#

1 2/3

torn lagoon
#

it will be 10/6

thorn birch
#

ok now what

torn lagoon
#

simplify

misty dirge
#

Simplify.

torn lagoon
#

10/6 can be condensed into a simpler fraction

thorn birch
#

1 4/6?

torn lagoon
#

do you know the factors of 10 and 6?

#

10: 1, 2, 5, 10
6: 1, 2, 3, 6

Notice they have a common factor of 2

misty dirge
#

5/10 is the same as 1/2

thorn birch
#

ok

torn lagoon
#

therefore, you can divide both terms by 2 to get the simplest fraction: 5/3

thorn birch
#

ok

#

is that all

torn lagoon
#

yes! it's as simple as it can get now

thorn birch
#

do u know how to find integer values

torn lagoon
#

when dealing with fractions and roots, try your best to simplify everything manually and without using a calculator until the end

torn lagoon
#

integer values? how so

thorn birch
torn lagoon
#

ah yeah, same principle!

#

so you can rewrite this one and combine the roots into one fraction, you should get the square root of (90/10)

thorn birch
#

okay

torn lagoon
#

and from the previous problem, you just need to do the division inside the root first, then the square root of the result

#

for this problem it should be pretty simple arithmetic, no calculator required

thorn birch
#

so do i find the square root then divide them

torn lagoon
#

divide first, then do the square root

#

so whats 90/10

thorn birch
#

9

torn lagoon
#

right, now take the square root

thorn birch
#

of 9?