#help-27
1 messages · Page 113 of 1
I just don’t understand how it got to that form in the first place
I'm turning x^2 into -kx^2 + (1+k)x^2
If you do the algebra, they're the exact same thing
Yeah so why has that happened. Im sorry I’m just not getting that part
Hence this
To prove they're equal: -kx^2 + (1+k)x^2 = (1+k-k)x^2 = 1x^2 = x^2
But tbh that should be evident by the time you're doing polynomial division
So I just looked at the solution and they approached it a whole different way, which I should’ve noticed at the start but failed to.
(X-k) is a factor of f(x)
F(k) = 0 => k^3 + k^2 - k + k = 0
K^3 + k^2 = 0
K^2(k+1) = 0
K = 0 or -1
@quasi wasp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
every picture I draw of this supports the theorem, but I'm not sure how to start to prove it or how I would use the endpoint conditions
Try considering a function h(x) = f(x) - g(x)
After that, mean value theorem is your friend.
@raven orchid Has your question been resolved?
got you, thanks
Closed by @raven orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Kinda confused as to how the 13 ends up negative
For more clarity it’s a conics question
Changing from standerd form to general and that’s a picture of the answer key
Looks like the author made a mistake
Kinda confusing cause that’s a website which has answers like detailed, but the textbook key has the same answer
Ima ask someone
Yesterday I spent hours tryna figure a question jus for the teacher to tell me to try graphing it because the function is too high degree and we haven’t learning that
@humble cobalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I solve this problem?
$|2u-3v|=\sqrt{|2u-3v|^2}=\sqrt{(2u-3v)\cdot(2u-3v)}$
chlamydia
do you see how this works?
@stray nova
what chlamydia did is use the definition of the norm you are using
square it, then take the root
they then rewrote the squaring as multiplying it with itself
what we can then do is outmultiply the brackets
this will give us terms like u^2, u * v and v^2
the u^2 and v^2 are easily solved by using the definition of your norm again
for the u * v part, you will want to look at the definition of the scalarproducts
ohhhh I see
there is an alternative to this, but this way is by far the easiest
May I see it?
the alternative would be to notice that the exact orientation of the vectors is irelevant
thus we can just choose u=(1,0,0)
then we can look for a vector v=(x,0,0) such that the angle will be pi/3
then we can just calculate 2u-3v
Is this a theorem?
a theorem i just made up
intuition basically
we will get a specific vector for 2u-3v which depends on our choice of u and v
however the length of that vector will always be the same if |u|, |v| and the angle are the same as was given
but the V vector has to satisify the condition that the magnitude is 2 right
yes
so we have two conditions, || v || =2, and the angle between them must be pi/3
I meant to type | | v | |
@stray nova Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, i have a question on algebra and just need some help
Post the question you are stuck on and patiently wait for help
well, its not really a question, i just need help understanding the concept if that makes sense?
Then post it what it is
It's not like the people here have telepathy and can read your mind
Closed by @tardy fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why dividing distance by time gives speed. please help me imagine the process of dividing distance by time
What is speed
Lightning McQueen /s
i don't know
How would you define speed?
Well what’s distance
speed times time
(This is actually a bit of a tricky question)
what do you mean
The distance is something that measures a property of 2 points
okay
Does that make sense?
Kinda
oaky
If I gave you 2 point let’s say your home and your school
I can ask you about the distance between those 2 places
because we count the distance between my home and my school by arbitrary units that we made up ie meters
Sure
right?
Well the idea is that to go from point A to point B takes some time
Let’s say the points were 50 units apart
If it takes you 1 hour to get from A to B
Then every 1 hour you can travel 50 units
Does that make sense?
Well if I asked you, how many times can you travel from A to B then to A then to B etc
In 3 hours
What would you say?
" how many times can you travel from A to B then to A then to B etc" can you elaborate this?
Like go back and forth between A and B
i would say 6 times but i wouldn't say that i understand what i'm doing
Well it takes 1 hour to get from A to B
then 3 times
i'm thinking
You can try to describe it with words
The important thing here is to try express your thoughts
because we counted |AB| |BA| |AB| with 1 hour units and each distance was 1 hour unit?
Aha!
What if I told you it takes 1.5 hours to go from A to B
And I still only had 3 hours
we defined traveled distance by hours, then when dividing that distance by time we were counting by that time unit?
Yes
That’s what “per” means
When we say 60kmph
That’s saying 60 km per hour
Or 60km/hr
Or every hour we travel 60km
What’s wrong with that
with what?
With what you just said
is something wrong?
Nothing is wrong
i don't know what's wrong
But you said it was hard
yes it is
Which part of that was hard?
trying to understand division
(I’m not saying it should be easy, just wondering where you are having difficulty)
Ah
Do you understand division in other contexts?
like what?
Like splitting a pizza between people
yes i can understand splitting a pizza
Do you also get that division is like the inverse of multiplication?
i know but i don't get
ring theory right?
$\div(*(a, b), a)=b$
Frosst
Mhmm never mind
what do you want me to do
If you multiply something by a then divide by a
You get what you started
yes that's right
So in a sense it’s doing the opposite of multiplication
That’s just the word we use
“How much are the ice cream?”
“They are 3 dollar each”
This is the same as saying
“They are 3 dollars per ice cream”
yes but i can't make a connection between (dollars/ice cream?) and (why is it a division?)
Because every 3 dollars gets you an ice cream
If I change the question
“How many ice cream can I buy per dollar?”
Now I want to know ice cream/dollar
I also just noticed I’ve used ice cream subconsciously because of your name lol
lol
Anyhow, now it is 0.3333… ice cream per dollar
Or 1 ice cream per 3 dollars
$\frac{0.333…}{1} = \frac{1}{3}$
Frosst
No I just went $\frac{0.333…}{1}=0.333…=\frac{1}{3}$
Frosst
Can you give an example where you don’t understand the meaning
okay
how are we dividing dollars by ice cream?
or binqilin i would say
What’s wrong with that
in a way every new division example looks like an alien concept but not multiplication
Have you seen F = ma before
yes countless times
What’s m measured in (typically)
kg in europe
What about a
m/s
How does it make sense to multiply kilograms with meters divided by seconds
It might be a useless thing to think about
mass go big, mass hit big
But this kind of measurement happens to be what force means
Also it’s m/s²
Similar to how we are dividing units here
It’s meaningless unless it tells us something
Dollars/ice cream tells us how much it costs to buy ice cream
kgm/s² tells us how much force something applies
If we want to measure work
We multiply F by distance
If we apply a force over some distance we do some work
In the same sense “if we apply some speed over some time we travel some distance”
It’s a very rough analogy but maybe it helps you understand the connections
why it is multiplication?
It just happens to be
why not force + distance
Because it doesn’t align with the real world
“We applied 1 unit of force over 5 units of distance”
That’s usually the way we phrase it
But this is fine as well
okay i got this
now all i need to do is understanding the inverse of this
aaah
Well what if I asked
How much force do I need to apply over some distance to do X work
I give you the distance and the work
How do you find the force
We usually use s for distance
It’s also a bit wrong but I don’t think the difference matters in our context
what is c
The path
But honestly it’s not really the point of our discussion
If C is just some path from s = 0 to s = s then it’s just W = Fs
Fuck
Frosst
It was weird when I started writing it
Or rather $W=\int_{s=0}^{s=d}F\cdot , ds = [Fs]_{s=0}^{s=d} = Fd - 0 = Fd$
Frosst
So if we move from 0 to d (a force F applied over a distance d)
Then we did work equal to Fd
Which is what you have here
yes i remember from college
Anyhow it’s not really the point we’re focusing on
This is how division is helpful
How much work did we do per distance?
1 work = |....| distance
i'm trying to visualise distance and work
in my mind
trying to visualise what would work per distance look like to be exact.
Work might be a bit abstract to think about
everything is abstract
okay if we have 100 human
10 humans*
and if they are paired with each other
how many group we have per pair
one pair is 2 humans
aah
this is where i got lost
group per pair
is there any division contexts than these?
ask what about it?
There are 5 groups
There are 2 people per group
Or 1 group per 2 people
2 people is a pair
1 group per pair
Group per pair means how many pairs of people are in a group?
Since you defined here 1 group has 2 people paired together
You get 1 group per pair
But groups per pair answers the question: “How many groups can you make with 1 pair of people?”
can you give an easy example about permutation that includes division?
okay then
Combinatorics is usually easier
maybe i'm mixing them
How many ways are there to pull 4 aces from a deck of cards?
1 way
Actually that’s probably too hard too
How many ways are there to pull 3 aces from 4 cards from a deck of cards
That’s better
The division in these question takes care of “over counting”
Honestly these are pretty shit examples 😦
I can’t think of a good one on the spot
my brain is about to explode
"PAPAYA" how many meaningless or meaningful words can we write, using each word each time
this requires division
nevermind this is too hard for me
Ah
That’s a good example
The A’s are indistinguishable
So whether the first, second or third A goes anywhere
It’s the same permutation
no i'm serious this is like phd level division nevermind
okay what about interpolation factor
x-x0/x1-x0
x0------x--------------x1
x0------x and
x0---------------------x1
.close
Closed by @next dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Closed by @next dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need to be taught 85,86,87
You mean the same slope ?
Ok so get the function in the (a 85)
To be
y = mx + c
Form
Done?
@savageben.123#4537
Umm
You need to divide the 4 to the whole right side
Not just x
It will be like this
$$y=\frac14x+\frac14$$
Sherif Player
Ok ?
got it yeah
So the slope is 1/4
i messed that up but i understand
Now just get the derivative of the function and equation it to 1/4
the deriv is just e^x right
Yeah
what would i do after getting deriv'
Equate it to 1/4 and get the x and y values of each point that satisfies the slope
As you need to get a point in the derivative that its slope is equal to 1/4
Yes
Now just get the x value that satisfies this condition
And then substitute it to the original function to get the y value of the point that satisfies the conditions
im confused on that part^
the x value that satisfies
Do you know how to solve for x there ?
no
Did you get to know the logarithmic functions?
no im afraid not
Like
$$\log_2(8)$$
$$\ln(e^2)$$
Nothing of those ?
Sherif Player
@stray socket ?
no i havent seen those before
Then you need to learn about them to solve 85 and 86
Did you just get that from an online calculator?
no i looked at the notes from today
So you learned about it today ?
I mean how do you don't even remember that you got those
And this is in your notes
was it right?
anyway. when i get my x=ln(1/4) do i sub it into the original y=1/4x+1/4
Yeah it was right but I am afraid that you just don't understand why it is the solution to it and how to get its value by your self in the future
well my exam is tommow so i have to learn it by tonight
but i need to know how to solve the 85,86,87
This is a really good unit there to learn about it
well ill be checking it out tonight
So now you got the value of x right
What will you get when you substitute it to the original function
@stray socket ?
It should be easy
I said original function before taking the derivative
We don't want anything from the equation of the line except knowing its slope
No need for anything else
We knew its slope so just throw it out of the window
e^x?
Wait
Do you understand what derivative mean?
Like you now that it is about taking the slope of the function at any point x
e^ln(1/4)
yeah i understand the derivatives
is there a way to like call you? if not its fine its just hard for me to type
So to get the a line parallel to that line equation we need to find a point where the slope of the function equal the slope of the line
So we took the derivative of the function
F'(x) = e^x
And we equted it to the slope of the line
e^x = 1/4
To get
X = ln(1/4)
Now we need to know the y value of that point so we will substitute x back to the original function
F(x) = e^x
e^ln(1/4)
To get the value of y
That will output the same value 1/4
So the point will be (ln(1/4), 1/4)
So now you got a slope and a point right
Just make the equation of the line that has that slope and passes through the point
And you did it
@stray socket
All good ?
Is this right.
?
wait whys it ln4+1 and not 1/4
did i do something wrong
oh i think i get it
It should be
ln(4) not ln(4+1)
okay gotcha
thank you
on 86 it gives u 2 points so would u sub in the x value into e^x?
So you know that
$$\ln(\frac14) = -\ln(4)$$
Sherif Player
There is a point b in 85
If you didn't see it
to find the origin
So in your opinion what would you need to do
What!!!
Come on tell me that you know what is the origin point
i thought the origin was 0 on both axis
Yes
like point 0,0
Yes
how would i go about finding it?
id have to make a point 0,0
im going to move onto 86
Sorry for being late
no problem. im just preparing for my test
@stray socket
First do you know a way to Express the equation of a line of some point in a function by knowing that its x co-ordinates is a and its y co-ordinates is f(a)
If you don't know this is a quick way just remember this rule
(y-f(a)) = f'(a) * (x - a)
no i didnt know that
This works for every function
If it is continuous in the point you are doing that of course
and thats the equation of a line?
Yeah that's the equation of the tangent of any point in a function
Now in our case
f(a) is just e^a
Right?
your doing 86 right?
85b
yes then
Then what is f'(a)
would it just be e^a
Yes
wait so what is e^a in our problem
It is just the value of a function knowing that its x coordinates is x
Meaning it is the value of y in the graph of the function
Now we want to get a line equation that passes through 0,0
okay
would we use the equation u showed me
i dont think he taught us this way. or he may not have taught us at all because none of this is familiar
Yes we just want to first separate it to the
y = mx + c
Form
To make it easier on us
So here we need c to be 0
Sherif Player
$$y=e^ax+e^a-e^aa$$
Sherif Player
So now we got it to the form
So now you should know which part we want to be zero here
a?
No
Like what part represents the constant here
do u mean which constant should be
I mean which is the part that should be zero in that equation to make it look like
y = mx
if we are trying to get mx+b
everything to the right of the addition sign
needs to go right
Sherif Player
It is easy to solve tho
Just take e^a * a to the right side then divide by e^a
@stray socket
All good ?
Yeah but you can simplfie it more
a=1? or is that wrong lol
Yes
hell yea
It is correct
Now just substitute it to the original line equation
To get the line equation
No this is the general one
To use this you need to substitute the f(a) and f'(a)
I meant this
Or this
Both of them will work
So did you got the final line equation?
awesome
ill have to get some more help on that before my test tommorow
i learn much better in person
Now to 86?
86 actually uses the same equation I told you above
Not really but it uses it in another way
What do you think?
Yeah that works
let me work it out some
But there is another way
Which is
chain rule?
$$\frac{d}{dx}F^n(x) = F^{n-1}(x) F'(x)$$
Sherif Player
os tjat chain rule?
Yes
would the 4 be considered outter function
It is a constant that you can ignore and multiply by it in after getting the derivative
is it -4cos^2x
No
what would be considered the outter function of sin^2x
$$4 * sin^2(x)$$
$$4 * 2 * sin(x) * cos(x)$$
Sherif Player
Like this
Yes
Then substitute the point
8sinpi/6cospi/6
would i need the unit circle?
Not really
what would u do
can i not leave it like that?
You can but you can also simplify to be more easier
Like
2√3
You can
good
im gonna try 53
quotient rule first right
y=2x-1
did u work it out?
it says the answer is y=-1
Yeah because you should have got a 0 instead of 2
Happens a lot with new to average people in math:)
,rotate
When you substituted zero there how did you get 2?
Zero times something is zero
- zero times something which is zero
@stray socket sorry for that but I gotta sleep now so just use helpers tag here if you need any help
okay thanks very much
@stray socket Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@drifting torrenter How do I solve the problem: "too+too+spot what is the value of "t"" I don't even know where to start?
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
And post an image of the problem
That makes no sense, what you have typed
@vivid quiver Has your question been resolved?
do you have any values for S or P?
are these variables?
Do you mean as in the each hold a specific number value?
yes
Yes it is
huh
thst looks to be impossible if they are all single digits
2x+1 can never have same parity as x
its certainly impossiblr
Because she says it's possible
either that
So idk
if theres no carry over in first step then second should give t aswell
and if there is max carry is 1
so 2x+1 should give 10+x
wait lol
9
anyway
its doable im just dumb
o is 9
after that ig u can solve
t is 8
Closed by @vivid quiver
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help I'm having a mental health crisis
I just learned about this python package called sympy that lets you do all sorts of symbolic math
like differential equations and stuff
why am I trying to become a physicist when a calculator can do everything I could ever want to do
can I have a reason that I need to understand how to math when I could just type it in a calculator
whats the point of doing anything other than compsci at this point
gl typing proofs into a calculator
There technically are formal proof verifiers but
Or finding new theories lol
They are messy af
Physicists' sole job is not computing stuff lol
I get that the conceptual parts of the math is important
but why am I killing myself trying to understand DE
when I could just plug it in
a caluclator
Does physics even use proofs
oh really
ye
But yeah intro DE is a joke class that they make u go through most of the time cus idek
some top schools don't even have it as a requirement for math major nowadays
am I just failing at it because I skipped past calc 3
hmm it shouldn't require Calc 3 stuff 
well I guess im just stupid
Nah
Maybe ur just not the best at computations stuff
But we have computers for that nowadays
Like u pointed out
np
.close
Closed by @glad glen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i was wondering why theta is at that angle
@shut elbow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @shut elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What do i do i am stuck for 20 minuted
, rotate
I cant understand substitution
Try getting the value of y in terms of x in the first equation and substitute it to the second equation
Yes i tried and it didnt work
Or if you want to avoid square roots
You can get it from the second one and substitute it to the first one
Okay brb let me try it out
Did you got
$$y=\frac{23-x}{1+x}$$
$$x^2 + \frac{23^2-46x+x^2}{x^2+2x+1} = 34$$
$$\frac{x^2(x^2+2x+1) +x^2 - 46x + 23^2}{x^2+2x-1} = 34$$
$$x^4+2x^3+2x^2-46x+23^2=34x^2+68x-34$$
$$x^4+2x^3 -32x^2 -114x + 563 = 0$$
Sherif Player
,calc 23*23 +34
Result:
563
,calc 114/2
Result:
57
,calc 563/114
Result:
4.9385964912281
,wolf solve x^4 + 2x^3 -32x^2 -114x + 563
@woven citrus
Found an easier way yeah
@woven citrus Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @woven citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Helllo i need help with something

wait lemme send
I need to explain what Summation of a product is
and make 2 examples on how to do it
@opal birch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can a) possibly be a d-system if u(X) is not promised to be v(X)? where X is the whole space
that is indeed strange
@amber blade Has your question been resolved?
@amber blade Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
TRASLATED: Determine by calculating the interior angles if the triangle with vertices: ... Is a rectangle one
@viscid snow Has your question been resolved?
don't ping individual helpers
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
x^2013 + 1/x^2013 = 2. Find x^2022 + 1/x^2022
i can provide you with options
go on
well
if you have
u = x^2013
and u + 1/u = 2
theres a bit of an obvious solution
for u which u can then use to solve for x
Alright, ill try
have you worked out the value of u?
yeah, u is 1
thanky you very much
no worries
.close
Closed by @royal drift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@sinful inlet Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sinful inlet Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sinful inlet Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @sinful inlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
The product rule says that ... Explain why ....
I haven't begun yet because I don't know how but I have an idea that it might have something to do with the constant rule?
Do you need to show the rule for partial Integration?
ye
I need to figure it out
Nice, that is how I started my oral exam today 🙂
in uni?
How about bringing the two integrals on one side?
Yes
nice. first year?
Finals over first and second semester
Did you do that?
nice
I didnt even know you could put them together like that until 10 seconds ago
I thought it would make sense and I guess it was right xD
That's just the linearity of the integral
can't we just differentiate everything?
that way, we will use the product rule and the fact that d/dx(integral(f))=f
assuming that f is integradable of course
Yes, that's another way of doing it !
@west tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @west tinsel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Use partiel integration on f(x) = x and g(x) = 1/(1+x^2)^n to realize that:...
the differentiated of 1/(1+x^2)^n is really insane, I dont know if its necessary for me to calculate it here
it's not that insane
yes
how would you do it?
by hand
idk where to go from here or even if I did it wrong
<@&286206848099549185>
@west tinsel Has your question been resolved?
@west tinsel Has your question been resolved?
,rotate
@west tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @sharp wigeon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm unsure if this is the correct approach
as i've also asked for AI's opinion and it gives something quite different althought similar taste
Bruh never ask an AI to do math for u
don't use chatgpt for math
XD
$\lim_{n\to\infty} \tfrac{f(n)}{g(n)} = ?$
$\lim_{n\to\infty} \tfrac{g(n)}{f(n)} = ?$
YouShouldBeHigher
do you know Stirling's approximation to the factorial?
ok so for large n, $n^44^n >> n^33^n$, follow?
YouShouldBeHigher
means "is very much bigger than"
yes
so we can ignore the lesser term
ye we just look at n^4 * 4^n right
i put 4^n which is incorrect? should be the whole large expression
yes
which is n^4 * 4^n
YouShouldBeHigher
yes, and the numerator simplifies to 2^n * n^3 because we take the largest expression in the sum of expression of n(n-1)(n-1)?
if we multiply out the factors, we will get a cubic polynomial n^3+...
when n is large, the n^3 term will dominate the lesser terms
In this case would we just be comparing degrees instead of factorials vs exponentials speed
so now we only need consider
$\tfrac{f(n)}{g(n)} \approx \tfrac{2^nn^3}{6\sqrt{n^44^n}}$
YouShouldBeHigher
YouShouldBeHigher
infinity and 0 respectively?
so you were right, f is faster
thank u for ur help bro!
np
i would just check for f(n)/g(n) and g(n)/f(n) right?
and then since f(n)/g(n) is infinity and g(n)/f(n) is 0
i can conclude that f(n) growsfaster
after simplifying with heuristics
either wouldn't be fast?
im not sure
it'd just be a difference in numbers but the ratio would remain the same?
they grow proportionally to each other
f(n) ~ c*g(n) where c is a constant
ok, we good?
ye i think so
@misty dirge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @misty dirge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
try rewriting the fraction as a product of two
a product of 2?
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
yeah, you can split the fraction up into a product of two numbers
ill give you the first part of it -> (5/6) * (? / ?)
would it be the cube roots?
hint: cbrt(24/3) is the same as cbrt(24)/cbrt(3)
ok chbe root (24/3)
ye
So (5/6) cuberoot(24/3)
yes, being multiplied. you can simplify the cube root further
cube root of 24 and 3?
How can u split cube root 24 to simplify it?
12 and 2?
what r u talking abt division?
if you have the cube root of (24/3), you can simplify the division in side. 24/3 is 8, so you would have the cube root of 8 or cbrt(8)
okay
so your term now looks like (5 / 6) * cbrt(8)
okay
do you know what number raised to the 3rd power is equal to 8?
or in other words, what is the cube root of 8?
2 ?
yes
yea
so you should now have (5/6) * 2
okay
one thing to note though is that you can only rewrite fractional roots like this if they have the same power (in this case, cbrt is power 3 root)
ok
if you have sqrt(24)/cbrt(3), you would not be able to simplify any further
what is the star representing
Times
Right now u have 5 * 2 * cuberoot(3) / 6 * cuberoot(3)
U can simplify that
Anything divided by itself is what?
1.66666 ???? idk it came up with a bunch of 6
you can do it without a calculator
1 2/3
it will be 10/6
ok now what
simplify
Simplify.
10/6 can be condensed into a simpler fraction
1 4/6?
do you know the factors of 10 and 6?
10: 1, 2, 5, 10
6: 1, 2, 3, 6
Notice they have a common factor of 2
5/10 is the same as 1/2
ok
therefore, you can divide both terms by 2 to get the simplest fraction: 5/3
yes! it's as simple as it can get now
do u know how to find integer values
when dealing with fractions and roots, try your best to simplify everything manually and without using a calculator until the end
ill try
integer values? how so
ah yeah, same principle!
so you can rewrite this one and combine the roots into one fraction, you should get the square root of (90/10)
okay
and from the previous problem, you just need to do the division inside the root first, then the square root of the result
for this problem it should be pretty simple arithmetic, no calculator required
so do i find the square root then divide them
9
right, now take the square root
of 9?
