Channel closed
Closed by @green verge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 101 of 1
Closed by @green verge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello friends
So why is it like that on the right side
Doesn’t the preimage of {z} under f give only the 2 sets in the σ-algebra of M (domain of f) whose measure is z?
Or maybe a better way to phrase it is what does the preimage of {z} under f look like
Here’s what I think: all k ∈ M such that f(k) = z is included in the preimage of {z} under f, ie the union of all such k’s
Wtf does that even say
;-;
Let $f$ be a non negative measurable function.
$\$1) Markov Inequality.
$\\int f d\mu \geq z\cdot \mu(\text{preim}_f({z}))$
Frosst
What I think it should say:
$\\int f d\mu \geq z\cdot \mu(\text{preim}_f({s\in\mathbb{R}^{+0}| s\geq z}))$
Frosst
@jaunty mantle Has your question been resolved?
[ f \ge z , \chi_{\set {f = z}} ]
Doesn’t that on his example give only the 2 points where z intersects the function?
this is also true
But how do we measure just 2 sets
2 sets?
Doesn’t the measure function take in a set (an element) of the σ-algebra?
Well the 2 points are 2 sets aren’t they?
2 sets (elements) of the σ-algebra
[ \set {f = z} = f^{-1}(z) = \set {x \in \op{dom} f \where f(x) = z} ]
it's a set
Ok
Then we can split them up and measure them separately?
Then we add them together?
well the measure is defined on this set when f is measurable
so there's no need to "split" since μ of that set is well defined
Cos otherwise you don’t get everything between
What he’s saying here is that the blue area is less than or equal to the white and blue area
yes
Sure but that’s only equality
Which fine you can have non-strict inequality
But that inequality part is meaningless
Let’s say the 2 points of intersection is a, b
sure
mu({a, b}) and mu({a, a₁, a₂, …, b}) aren’t the same right?
Well, unless the middle bits have measure 0
Then they are equal
But if they aren’t measure 0 then the right side is bigger than the left side
yeah
So what’s the point of saying int f dmu >= z mu({a, b}) when this is trivial, and equality only when the middle bits have measure = mu({a})
Wouldn’t it make more sense to talk about how it’s > when the middle bits have measure > mu({a})

f could have a part which is constant at z
but i think they meant to write >= z
the usual markov inequality has >=
Ok if I’m not the only one that thinks there should be a >= so it’s not a trivial statement
Then I’m probably not going crazy yet
I mean I can see that the inequality holds, but is trivial
Well the integral part already measures {a, b}, so with the rest of the integral it must be at least the measure of {a, b}
it's a consequence of this pointwise inequality of functions
yeah but f^-1(z) could be much more than just two points
and much worse behaved
Shouldn’t this just have f = z chi_{f=z}
Well it’s not wrong but isn’t it more reasonable
Oh
Oh wait the chi only gives 0 or 1
So when f ≠ z, then f >= 0
Nice
When f = z, then f = z
So in general, f >= z chi_{f=z}
yeah
Closed by @jaunty mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Currently, I am working on polynomials. I am comparing the tasks and the content in the books. Could I have made a mistake?
I also watched the tutorial to remind myself
5
did you maybe mean x^5
yes
okay so you're dividing x^5 + 3x^2 - 4x + 1 by x^2 - 3
-3
and you are confused because terms of different degree ended up under each other
is that what happened
I have the same done task in my notebook and it doesn't say 6x^5
...
this
does not answer my question at all
oh also $3x^2 + 3x^3 \neq 6x^5$ at all if that's what you thought
Ann
ummm I divided x^2-3 by x^3 and got x^5-3x^3 when I subtract that, what do you get?
frst is 0 but yhen u have 6x^5 and that doesn't match my notebook
you get $3x^3 + 3x^2 - 4x + 1$
Ann
no you don't have 6x^5.
no you don't have 6x^5.
3x^2 + 3x^3 is not 6x^5.
by your logic x + x is 2x^2.
which it isn't
no the tutorial isn't bad
YOU are bad for thinking exponents add like this.
do you really honestly think that 3 * x * x + 3 * x * x * x equals (3+3) * x * x * x * x * x?
+3x^2 - (-3x^3) is not 6x^5
you're right it is not!
bro what is this
oh
when I can't just take subtraction i just rewrite them
cus that is +3x^2+3x^3
.close
Closed by @young geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Whats the best way to simplify this?
poly'l division
Could you help me with it? Idk how to solve it though
This precalculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into synthetic division of polynomials. You can use it to find the quotient and remainder of a division problem with polynomials. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems.
Algebra 1 Review:
https://www.video-tutor.net/algebra-for-beginners-basic-introduction.h...
the video has specific numbers, but you'll have to use variables a, b, and c
i would use long division over synthetic
Im trying to do it with long division but i dont get it
Ill try it again later thanks
.close
Closed by @silver anchor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
This video tutorial explains how to perform long division of polynomials with remainder and with missing terms. It's explains how to do long division easily and it provides the step by step process to get it done. Basically, there are 3 steps that you have to repeat. 1. Divide 2. Multiply 3. Subtract This video contains plenty of ex...
$\polylongdiv[stage=1]{x^4+x^3-2x^2-5x+6}{x^2-2x+1}$
hayley!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$y=2^{2} + 16x + 30$
Chocolate
how can I turn this to vertex form
You're missing an x. Once it's fixed, you find the vertex form by completing the square.
great explanations, Thank you sir
short, using simple words, concise, brief, amazing explanation mate
.close
Closed by @rigid ivy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i get the 1/s part
Do you know about partial fractions?
You mean by how 1/s(s^2+1) is equal to 1/s-s/(s^+1) right?
Ok
like i dont understand how that works
If you only want to verify it, you can use the common denominator method for adding and subtracting fractions
how do i do that
oh ik how to do this
i just dont know how to implement it into my qns
In this case a is 1, b is s, c is s, d is s^2+1
ahhh okay that makes sense
ty
.close
Closed by @stable atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is my halfassed explanation gud nuf
@hasty flame Has your question been resolved?
I need help
@hasty flame Has your question been resolved?
@hasty flame Has your question been resolved?
@hasty flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the 2 is on the wrong side, also make sure you write a multiplication symbol between the 2 and the fraction
Ok
Wait but the big R
Is twice the size
Right
Yeah. Exactly. It can be confused as a mixed fraction so make sure to use a multiplication symbol or dot.
If you multiply it it is 4 times
Ok I will do that in the future
Yes. So, one with R has more volume. Right?
Yes
So 2 * formula for R = formula for r
So shouldn't you be multiplying the smaller one with 2 so that volume of smaller one becomes equal to volume of bigger one?
wait wtf yeah ur right
Idk what I was thinking thx
So it becomes that
7
Did I do it right? Like I got the same answer but I want to make sure I did it the right way
type .close
.close
Closed by @short hinge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
No this graph represents the position of the boat, not the velocity. Remember that the displacement is simply the difference in the position of the object and is independent of the path taken when traveling between those two positions
Therefor the displacement is the distance between where the object is at time t=16 and at time t=0
which is -15 meters from our reference point minus 6 meters from our reference point
Closed by @languid vessel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can we apply epsilon delta of limit definition to check limit exist?
Or just check f(a+h) =f(a-h) existantance
You can
Can I drop a question?
You can
No way it's asking this
What?
I don't know how to prof $\lim_{x\to 0 } \dfrac{\sin x }{x} = 1$ with eps delta
tales
Is it specifically written epsilon delta proof?
Nope
It's only me who is trying 
Then you have to prove this with eps delta
I know it's exist
And prove product rule
that's easier
I don't know how to do it
I searched online and there is no proof
@wooden axle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm not sure how to calculate the original price of the car here or how to find the interest paid. The answer to one of them leads to the answer of the other ofc since I know how much Madeline paid for the car. Which do I solve for first and how? (Attachment 1 is the problem and confirmed correct figures I have come up with, Attachment 2 is the work I have done, and Attachment 3 is the given formula sheet)
@chrome stag Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> Sorry to bother, just using the ping since I can use it once after 15 minutes
@chrome stag Has your question been resolved?
The principal is the original amount of the loan - P by definition
@chrome stag Has your question been resolved?
It was that simple, dang
Thanks for the help!
.close
Closed by @chrome stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help anyone
and please try to guide me further from the second step i did
because our teacher told this as a hint
i tried using sinC+sinD and inverse in the denominator
but didnt do anything
no need
Dyssrupt
wait lemme do it this way
you should've noticed that the sum was 90 degrees
wait what do you mean, does this identity is apllicable if A+B=90?
wait, i dont know this identity
Dyssrupt
for denominator
um
use C D formula on where you left
you'll eventually get this
i think i did something wrong?, didnt i?
combine the pairs to form sin(2x)
yeah i thought of that
@dry oxide Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In mathematics, smooth functions (also called infinitely differentiable functions) and analytic functions are two very important types of functions. One can easily prove that any analytic function of a real argument is smooth. The converse is not true, as demonstrated with the counterexample below.
One of the most important applications of smoot...
@supple pasture Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @hardy tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Show your work
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I cannot understand these numbers or the concept of Using Quadratic Equations to Represent Motion
it is difficult to give good interpretations to the numbers in this problem
Closed by @rigid ivy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I'm needing help with my homework, not necessarily help me get the answer, I'm just a bit unclear what it's asking me. if anybody can let me know it would be great, Like does it want me to list each point on the unit circle or am i supposed to increment
you're supposed to increment t
as well as write the respective point
(until you get all the red points )
okay so basically filling out each red bullet by incrimenting?
yes
Okay, thank you so much lol, I was a bit confused
e.g.
what's pi/4 + pi/4
and what are the coordinates of the terminal point there
and continue
Closed by @neat summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help simplifying this equation (pardon the handwriting)
its just $3 \qty( \frac{9+13}{6} )$?
jan Niku
yep
hmm what have you tried?
well i tried adding 9 + 13
whatd you get
22
alright
jan Niku
what else could you do here?
well i dont know how to multiply with the 3 since its outside the quantities
hmm what sort of fraction rules do you know
maybe its helpful to write this as
$\frac 31 \cdot \frac{22}{6}$
jan Niku
and 1 * 6?
yea
wait up
$\frac{3 \cdot 22 }{ 1 \cdot 6}$
jan Niku
66 and 6
jan Niku
so final answer?
this simplifies nice
wait no
11
yup
then
cant get much simpler than that
11 * 3
❌
oh wait no
we already did something with the 3
yeah a fraction
it lives inside 66
yes
idk im just expressing that you already dealt with it
yeah
so could you like make a list of what to do in this situation
like 1st step and last step
then ill be good to go
sorry
youll get better at it as you do more
np
.close
Closed by @wraith prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why my thought was wrong? I had to solve lim x->0 (sin(3x)/x) so I multiplied the number by 3/3, so I could get a (sin(3x)/3x). The problem is that after multiplying by 3/3 I got lim x->0 (3sin(3x)/3x) and the first thing I have tried was split the limits (lim x -> 0 of 3/3x and lim x->0 sin(3x)/3x) I got a 0. According to my text book the answer should be 3, which would make sense if first I find the limit of sin and then multiply by 3, but the limit will make the denominator "disappear"? Probably I'm having an algebraic issue here but I can't see why resolving the sin limit it would make the 3x disappear. I am mistaken? I know that this is a stupid question and I should know the answer
the first thing I have tried was split the limits (lim x -> 0 of 3/3x and lim x->0 sin(3x)/3x)
do you mean you did
$$\lim_{x\to0}\frac{3\sin(3x)}{3x}=\lim_{x\to0}\frac{\sin(3x)}{3x}\cdot\lim_{x\to0}\frac{3}{3x}$$
light
Yes!
youve applied the limit property incorrectly
its not a big deal, just a small error to remember in the future
It should have been lim x->0 3sin(3x)?
Thanks light! It makes sense. I really appreciate the help
im not sure how you got rid of the 3x in the denom?
Oh, no, you're right, I can't do that either
$$\lim_{x\to0}\frac{\sin(3x)}{3x}\cdot\lim_{x\to0}\frac{3}{3x}=\lim_{x\to0}\left(\frac{\sin(3x)}{3x}\cdot\frac{3}{3x}\right)$$
Yup! Got it now! Thanks 😄
light
there we go lol
I appreciate the help
you should split up the 3sin(3x)/3x into two components, (3 * sin(3x)/3x)
Yes, we're talking about this property, right?
yes
you can factor out a 3 from the numerator
and after factoring out that 3, you're left with just limit of sin(3x)/3x as x > 0
Closed by @still radish
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I find the reference angle for 100?
It suggests to subtract using multiples of 2pi but I did but I’m not sure if I’m missing something or passed by an answer
use the definition
An angle’s reference angle is the measure of the smallest, positive, acute angle t formed by the terminal side of the angle t and the horizontal axis.
is 100 acute?
its maybe easier to just think of it as this definition like
make the smallest angle between your angle and the horizontal axis
So it would be anything less than pi/2?
Or the nearest to 2pi
The one in red I tried close to 2pi and close to 0. Still no answer
@burnt leaf Has your question been resolved?

<@&286206848099549185>
@burnt leaf Has your question been resolved?
The reference angle is the degree or radian angle that would result in you getting back to the horizontal axis the fastest. 100 is in quadrant 2, so figure out how you can get that angle which is in quadrant 2 to the x axis on the left.
That angle is either pi, or 180°.
@burnt leaf
It’s in Radians
100 is not specified as degrees and I already tried it as degrees just in case it was that
Try converting 100 radians to degrees and then back to radians, and then subtracting 2pi until you’re within a radius of 2pi.
I find it to be more confusing when the radian angle does not include pi.
Closed by @burnt leaf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to express the sequence {...,-3/10,-2/5,-1/2,0,1/2,2/5,3/10,4/17...} using N as my ambient set
Does it look better to say:
Invictus
or,
Invictus
typo: ignore the ^2 in the numerators of both sets
I would consider the two equivalent
@eager latch Has your question been resolved?
yes definitely, but which is more aesthetically pleasing
i prefer the 2nd but i guess the 1st is more "detailed"
I prefer the second
And do not think the 1st is more detailed
It's just more verbose
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Like, $\sum$ do $\prod$ also have property if so what are they can you provide a yt video or explain?
.fire007
here is a video i found after searching for a bit about sigma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=st-6vZESf8A
👉 Learn how to find the partial sum of an arithmetic series. A series is the sum of the terms of a sequence. An arithmetic series is the sum of the terms of an arithmetic sequence. The formula for the sum of n terms of an arithmetic sequence is given by Sn = n/2 [2a + (n - 1)d], where a is the first term, n is the term number and d is the common...
capital pi is used similarly to sigma, except instead of adding were multiplying
What does the symbol capital pi mean in mathematics?
Capital Pi or upper-case pi (Π) commonly appears in summations and acts as a product operator. So instead of adding terms, we multiply them when substituting our starting and end points.
In summary you can think of the more commonly used summation involving the use of Sigma but replaced with...
Does it follow the property that $\prod a \pm \prod b = \prod a \pm b$?
.fire007
nope
Closed by @spice pecan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it accurate to call this slightly left skewed?
Left skewed is the opposite
Well this distribution doesn't have a very significant skew, so I'd suggest that if you are going to call this a skewed distribution, include a comparison of the mean, median, and mode in your justification.
I think @pastel onyx is correct in calling this a (slightly) left-skewed distribution?
Closed by @pastel onyx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is the domain of (f∘g)(x) = ((sqrt(x+6)^2)+5 [-6, +inf) and not (-inf, +inf)? (f∘g)(x) = ((sqrt(x+6)^2)+5 simplifies to x+11. Why do we calculate the domain before we square the sqrt(x+6)?
To be clear, I understand that the text here says that it is "useful to consider the composition before any simplification", but this doesn't really seem like something that is "useful". It seems like something that is "mandatory".
Do i misunderstand the order of operations? Does squaring (sqrt(x+6)) not counteract the radical? Or are we supposed to take the square root, and then square the result, thereby "undoing" the radical?
(f o g)(x) = f(g(x))
g(x) itself needs to be defined at the value of x
to be able to have something to plug into f
e.g taking x=-7 for example
g(-7) = sqrt(-1)
(undefined in the real number system, which is what you're working in)
f(something undefined),
can't compute that
Closed by @lusty swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im at 2x^2 + 9x -980 = 0
im stuck at (2x+ )(x - )
whats the fast way to find factor for the -980
like im guessing what times what makes 980 but that takes long im sure theres a faster way?
afaik, i cant think of any fast ways for a number that large, what about the quadratic formula?
oh that would b better i suppose
or if calculators are allowed, u can use that
Closed by @cloud thunder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
What's ur question?
no
Hes trynna find the factor for it
oh
oh
Isaac, u want to factorize that thing?
x^2 + 9x/2 -490 = 0?
Yes
yheah
2x² prevents it
Looks about right
For me, I would use quad formla
bro
It didnt work for him
I use quad to have this...
how...
I dont know ask him lmao
ikd i got a fat sqrt
I just backreaded and he said thta
Closed by @cloud thunder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
how do i solve this]
like it doesnt exactly make sense\
am here to help u
so what do i have to do to find it
which part doesn't make sense to you?
you have a triangle here in which two sides have been given as 550m and 700m, and the angle between them as 30°.
idk what to do after that
ok so it's that's you're stumped, and not that the problem itself doesn't make sense.
big difference.
ok now
do you know your basic trig? like soh-cah-toa stuff?
yh
so to find the area 0f the traingle i have to find the area of the rectangle
that's what the problem wants you to do, yes.
maybe you know "half-base-times-height" as a canned/memorized formula for the area of a triangle, but this rectangle stuff has always been there as its proof.
anyway, do you catch my drift here with the red line i drew?
i don't know what "a triangle that is cos" or "a triangle that isn't cos" even is tbh.
so either you're confusing me with your wording or you are confused yourself
what
would the triangle be cos?
i don't have the faintest clue what you might possibly mean by this.
again i don't know what "it" is.
are you trying to write out a ratio of sides here?
yh
ok then write out a ratio of sides
all the points have names so all sides can be talked about without trouble
___(30°) = ___ / ___
fill in the blanks, the first with a trig function, and the other two with sides
huh
don't give out answers esp. wrong ones!
ok
cos 30 =550/700
incorrect
this would only be true if ABC were known to be a right triangle.
which we don't know.
and i am asking you to look at triangle ABH and not at ABC.
and also i drew that red line for a reason... its length is what we want to find.
idk what to do
ok then let us go through this step by step
i will give you instructions that i expect you to read carefully and follow precisely.
are you willing to do both of those?
yes
ok
look at triangle ABH in this diagram. of its three sides, only one has a length known to us. which one?
answer in the following format, filling in the blanks:
The only known side is ___, and its length is ___.
AH and 700\
❌ instruction not followed
❌ info incorrect
when i say "answer in the following format, filling in the blanks" i expect you to copy down the sentence i write and send it back to me with the blanks filled
try again
The only known side is AH__, and its length is 700 m___.
❌ info incorrect
700 m is NOT the length of AH.
700 m is AC, and AC isn't a side of triangle ABH.
also you fucked up and didn't delete the underscores.
try again
@mental grove
@mental grove
Formula called 0.5 * a * b * sinA :
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
are u telling me to demonastarte the proof of that formula?
no i'm telling you to back off until OP comes back
Gotchu 
@mental grove Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I am not sure if this is correct please someone check it. I got everything from YouTube but don’t think it’s correct
<@&286206848099549185>
ik
alr
I am in the course of the real world rn
bruh
thas crazy
bro i have been waiting the whole day for someone to help me with this page
i am not joking btw
also if you can can you check my others papers aswell if you have the time
what
alr
so what is the question mate
there are like more than 1 sub question
solving all of them?
@south rampart Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @south rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Bhaskara I sin(x) rational fraction approximation. i dropped out of high school at sophomore year and don’t know the symbols/operations related to alot of symbols especially in respect to the symbols before them. ive read that the brackets/parentheses are solved from the innermost nested to the outer, but ive also read that square brackets are a list or more importantly a range between the zeroth entry and the next so i just need some help understanding the application in this formula. do i divide the former by every integer between zero and the answer to the equation in the brackets or just divide by the solutions on either side of the division symbol.
Bhaskara I was an Indian mathematicians who wrote commentaries on the work of Aryabhata I.
the equation /expression whatever is in that link towards the middle of the oage
page
but ive also read that square brackets are a list or more importantly a range between the zeroth entry and the next so i just need some help understanding the application in this formula.
in this case the square brackets do not mean that
they are just the same as parentheses only they look different
tbh this is better written as a fraction: $\sin(x) = \frac{16x(\pi - x)}{5\pi^2 - 4x(\pi - x)}$
Ann
@tough light
can yall stick around to let me solve it and check me to make sure i understand please
sure, just tell us exactly what you're solving here
@tough light Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185> 🥲
@formal bronze Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
you've determined that the factor count of a^7 is always 1 mod 7
given k ∈ N try to find a number whose 7th power has exactly 7k+1 factors
this number will serve as a witness for the luckiness of 7k+1
Hi
I haven't learnt modular arithmetic
ok, then rephrase that as "the factor count of a^7 is always one more than a multiple of 7"
Help
...
K
How did I figure that out?
the factor count of a^7 is 7 * (SOME SHIT) + 1
where the shit is all made of integers
help
If a is prime only then no
please open your own channel. #❓how-to-get-help
au contraire
8 is also of the same form
7*1 + 1
How did u get this
by looking at this thing you wrote
do you not see that it's all a sum of various assorted multiples of 7 with a one at the end
I generalized the expansion (7x+1)(7y+1)...
Oh yes
But is it necessary that- OHHh
Got it
So now I find k?
Trial and error?
Meaning N =7k+ 1?
Pls tell me u aren't being sarcastic
see if you can consider something more general than primes but less general than all composites
what's a type of number that's in between those complexity-wise

Uhm...what's there except prime and composite and 1 in terms of factorization
i didn't say to discover a new class of numbers disjoint from those
i'll give you one more nudge in that direction and if you don't get it still i'll tell you what i meant
Okay
i'm talking about composite numbers but only ones whose factorizations are particularly simple
Hmm so like 2 times 3? I.e. not involving powers > 1? Or only involving 1 number in power?
only involving 1 number in power
shoddy wording but yes that
im talking about prime powers
i.e. numbers of the form p^k
Okay...
how many divisors does (p^k)^7 have?
7k + 1
i'd like to acknowledge explicitly that we've proved one important thing:
Find all multiples of 7 less than 99
a number is lucky IF AND ONLY IF it is of the form 7k+1
why do you ask me for permission
it's your channel
you are the only one who knows whether or not you have anything else to ask
Closed by @finite briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help on this math problem, im stuck on what it means by "a sum to infinity of 60", thank you
Do you know what is a geometric series?
Yes.
The number that they are multiplied by(to get the next term) is called common ratio.
yep
You might be used to representing common ratio by r, let's say that our common ratio is r.
thats what i usually do
Since first term is 6, and common ratio is r, what are the terms of the series? Try writing those.
u1=6 u2=6r u3=6r^2?
Yes and so on.
What they mean is that if you write such infinite terms and sum them all, you get 60.
Using that, you have to find r.
Basically,
$6 + 6r + 6r^2 + \cdots = 60$
Enemagneto
Has to be. Otherwise, it won't have a finite sum.
yeah true
Anyway, you can try to do it now. If you get stuck, i'll be here.
so if the formula is: u1(1-r^n)/1-r, do i put n as infinity or as 60?
What does n denote?
the number of the sequence
Number of terms in the sequence.
so it would be infinite
And, how many terms are there in your summation expression?
Yes.
But it would be more like taking limit $(n\to \infty)$, as you aren't exactly supposed to substitute infinity.
Enemagneto
im unsure of what youre saying here
So, for sum of n terms of Geometric series, you have -
$$S_{n} = u_{1} \cdot \left(\frac{1 - r^n}{1-r}\right)$$
Enemagneto
Okay.
👍
You need to put n as infinity. Right?
Yes i believe so.
Can you evaluate the expression $S_{n}$ for n = infinity?
Enemagneto
s-infinity = 6 x (1-r^infinity/1-r)?
Yes, but how will you calculate value of RHS here?
i forgot all of this but im not sure if its possible with the infinite power
Yes. You are supposed to take the limit therefore.
Are you familiar with taking limits?
no not yet
yes
So, if you take any number such that |r|<1, then if you multiply the number to itself, it becomes smaller(magnitude wise).
For example, r=1/2
r^2 = r * r = 1/4 which is smaller than 1/2.
If you multiply it once more with itself, it's 1/8 which is even smaller.
Good so far?
Enemagneto
Which is equal to
exactly
,w (1/2)^10
small number
Yes. Point is that as you increase power for a number r, where |r| < 1, magnitude reaches closer to 0.
If power goes to infinity, then it can be taken as just 0.
mhm
So, you have $r^{\infty} = 0$
Enemagneto
alright
Now, you should be able to solve your question, i believe.
Well, you know what is S here.
You were given in the question.
After that, just isolate r.
s is 60?
i got that 60=6(1/1-r) so then 10=1/1-r. then i realized that 1/0.1 is 10 so made it so 1-r equals 0.1 which makes r, the common different 0.9. Is this right?
Yeah, that's correct. You arrived at it little weirdly but it's alright.
but then this next one is just as confusing, i get u1=x, u2=x-3 and s/un=75
putting in the formula i got 75=x(1/1-r)
but i have 2 variables
No, you are good. You probably just put it weirdly. Lol
how, i dont understand
Well, r is the common ratio.
and you have two consecutive terms.
What will be their ratio?
No. Come on. Just take the ratio of the term.
Since x-3 is the second term, that means that
(x-3) = x * r
So, you get r as ?
Think about it, buddy.
You have a geometric progression. Where, each term is multiplied by r(common ratio) to get the next term.
That means that since $x$ is the first term, second term would be $x \times r$. Makes sense?
Enemagneto
@scenic goblet
yes pal
Enemagneto
Now, just isolate r.
You'll get r in terms of x.
Then, it's just one variable. You can solve it.
Well, how about dividing by x on the both sides?
You get $\frac{x\cdot r}{x} = \frac{x-3}{x}$
Enemagneto
r=-3
r=-2
Now, x gets cancelled out, and you are left with
$r = \frac{x-3}{x}$
Enemagneto
yes
That's wrong.
k
You get this.
im consfused aswell
me and @scenic goblet are in the same school and math class
could you just give the answer first
and then explain why please 🙏
I can't.
I can only help you get it.
Well, is this much clear?
wait let me read
can you give us the answer and tell us how you got there, thanks in advance
it woukd be so much more helpful
do we have what xis
as it seems to me as you keep repeating the same thigns
No. you have what r is, in terms of x.
Which you can substitute here, and get x.
how would u subsitite that
i havent got r yet so im not really sure as to what to do
think about it, buddy!
You got r in terms of x.
.
im puzzled
GOT IT!
i get it 105%
sorry we are a bit distracted w upping the ratio in the geometrial sequence of our fortnite career
amny thanks talk later
@manic condor thank you so extremely much for your help. For the future, could you give alittle hint with each message because i felt you kept repeating the same equation but thanks!
let me quickly plug it into the equation
what do you get
Well, you learn if you get it on your own. Also, it wasn't tough so i had expected you to get it on your own.
Seemingly, you seem to have too little patience for learning. Try to improve on that.
try simplifying (x-3)/x a bit more. It would be easier.
Use the fact that $\frac{a-b}{c} = \frac{a}{c} - \frac{b}{c}$
Enemagneto
you never know, i could be doing matsh way above my level so need more assistance!
will try my best to improve
Agreed. Regardless, you knew what geometric series is, so it's not too much to expect you to come up with (x-3)/x = r.
Any progress on this?
i apologize prefusely for my lack of mathematical talent
woudlnt it be 1-3/x?
1-3/x?
Come on. You know that's not what i want at all. Also, i can't even tell if you are being backhanded or not.
Regardless, let's get back to question.
Yes
okay
$\frac{x-3}{x} = \frac{x}{x} - \frac{3}{x} = 1- \frac{3}{x}$
so what to do next tchobs
Enemagneto
i dont have the formu;a
Now, look carefully at the denominator.
you have $1 - r$.
Enemagneto
If you substitute this r,
you get $1 - \left(1- \frac{3}{x}\right)$