#help-27
1 messages · Page 97 of 1
@polar wharf could you help me with this other question
lol facts
Adding all gives 4/9 but answer is 5/9 i guess
This is the question for reference
No one came yet?
:C no
I would have helped but idk abt this 1/3 method like can you explain what are you trying to do by taking (1/3)^3
np i appreciate your will to help
also 1/3^3 is basically
just cuz
if diana, for instnace, has to choose a group of 3 then there's 1/3 chance she'll choose 1 group
nnothing fancy
similarly for the other 2 brothers
so 1/3 * 1/3 * 1/3 = 1/3^3
Oh oh oh okayyy
Got it
Okay so
I got the answer
From this 1/3 method 😭
But my thinking again is ig different may I ?
In the first one
Where all are in same group
Shouldn't it be (1/3)^3 * 3C1
(Selection of one group where all will be together out of three groups)
That would be uhhhhhh 1/9
Then second case,
Where either B or C are with D
That means if D comes, C shoudlnt come in that place
So
[[(1/3)^2 x (3C1) ] *[(1/3)^1 x 2C1] ] into 2 for both cases
Damn
Adding both we get 5/9
@zealous ether
Here the first part is like B or C with D , in one group they get 3C1 chances to select one group of their choice
Then the remaining person who is not with D, gets to choose group in 2C1 ways
Whole into 2 cuz I directly chose C or B and you can do it differently
So here what's wrong is
lol bruh i don't get it maybe my brain is not working rn
but thank you!
I'll read it later cuz now i got class
When you multiply by 3! It means you're distributing B C D when you have already taken them in one group
Aye np
cheers
Yeah
.close
Closed by @zealous ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what can i do further to simplify ut
Make common denominators in $1 - \frac{\cos^2\theta}{\sin^2\theta}$
A Lonely Bean
Closed by @whole iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi guys can someone please help me get started with this question?
draw a picture
A picture?
of p(x)
I’m not sure what you mean by drawing p(x)
I’ve done something similar to that question but this one is a bit complicated
just do the integrals like you did in this question
That’s it?!
the definition of standard deviation involves two integrals
Here to learn, can I have the definition?
I only know the sum definition for like a list of data points
@supple knot do I work with 1 and 3
what do you mean "work with"
both values are important
Like with substituting
Here I used 0 and 1
yes both endpoints are necessary when evaluating integrals
should be dx
do you know how to do integrals?
power rule would be useful in this case
actually the left side is wrong
the integral is the expected value
this is p(x)
read this since you keep getting stuck
https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter4/4_1_2_expected_val_variance.php
Definitions and examples for expected values of continuous distributions
no?
@gilded wharf Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
,w 0.25 * int 1 to 3 of x^2
read this for the rest of the definition of standard deviation
@gilded wharf Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can you explain better what you mean?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @edgy plinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i solve this?
$$x^2\cos(x) = 1$$
Brandon H
,w x^2cos(x) = 1
Like that
ummm, i can't do that
There's really no other way to solve stuff like this
Unless you're really really good at plotting graphs
Do you know how i'm supposed to solve this then?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @exotic vortex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in geometry, how do you prove that some AB is longer than say AC
like a reliable tool to do so
What are you given about A, B and C?
Ptolemy's
yes
im just talking in general
i guess its just play with simple inequalities we have
.close
Closed by @ivory bluff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How?
Equate their coordinates.
their parametric equations?
sorry it's like my first/second time properly studying this
it's ok
we all have to start somewhere
if the lines meet then they'll meet at some well-defined point, and consequently the (x,y,z) of line 1 and the (x,y,z) of line 2 will have to coincide
thr c9mmsnd is .close
@alpine forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @alpine forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if i have
hiii
hiii
Of course you can
oh sure
maybe i just messed something up np
but that aside
if i have:
2^{99} \equiv 6 (mod 11)
and
2^{99} \equiv 8 (mod 9)
i want mod 99 so i'd be sieving right?
,, 2^{99} \equiv \text{something} \pmod{99}
hiii
What's sieving?
it's used to find the first solution for n systems of congruences
after which chinese remainder generalizes
this
.close
Closed by @zealous ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I approach this problem?
I first have to find theta but I'm not sure how to unwrap sin θ = 1/4
would 1 be opposite and 4 for the hypotenuse?
you don't have to find theta, you'll just have to find which quadrant theta is in
that's the first step
it would be in quadrant 1
this would be the second step
but then, since tangent is positive, therefore it's in Q1
is it a pythagorean identity?
cos(2θ) = 1-2sin^2(θ) ?
how would i plug in sin θ as 1/4?
we would now use this
sin(theta)=1/4 and theta in Q1
what will cos(theta) be
it will also be positive if its in Q1
let me draw the triangle
sure
my minds blanking, how would i solve for the adjacant angle?
i have opposite = 1, hyp = 4
ohh
nvm
hehe
you found it
you just solve for cosine theta
not the theta itself
which will be adj/hyp
therefore we just have to solve for the length of adj
2/4 = cosθ
1²+x²=4²
1 * 1 = 1
good
yey
finding the other side won’t help since you need cos (x/2)
you’ll need to solve for theta to get the answer
now that we have
cos(theta)=(√15)/4
we plug back into this
oh i see
good
i put that over 2?
$\cos\theta=\frac{\sqrt{15}}{4}$
Biscuity
nope
.
wouldnt it be cos2theta = 2cos^2(theta/2)-1?
since its a double angle identity?
oh is it because you changed the inside to /2
cos(x)=2cos²(x/2)-1
hehe
square root 15/4 = 2cos^2(x/2)-1
I get to here
opps
i feel like i misstepped in the beginning
my first step should be to get rid of the /4 right?
or move over the -1?
well both works for this q
anyways
sqrt(15)/4+1=2cos²(x/2)
(sqrt(15)/4+1)/2=cos²(x/2)
good?
in simplifying? should i sqrt both sides?
we just take sqrt on both sides of course
sqrt(sqrt(15)/4 + 1)/2 = cos(x/2)
yey
remember to see if it's positive or negative!
sqrt(sqrt(15)/4 + 1)/2) = cos(x/2)
yes
got it?
now simplify it to get the final answer
for the numerator of the whole thing
do common denominator thingy first
that is
sqrt(15)/4+4/4
huh?
Biscuity

cross multiply instead?
not sure
$\sqrt{\frac{\frac{\sqrt{15}+4}{4}}{2}}$
Biscuity
it's the numerator part divided by 2
the denominator of 4 isnt being divided by 2?
$\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{15}+4}{8}}$
Biscuity
this
oh so we can multiply the denominators
i thought we could but looking at the answer choices i wasnt sure
oh wait
nono i get it
sqrt8
hehe
now that 8 is NOT a square number, we do something to make it into a square number
i.e. expand this new fraction by 2/2
$\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{15}+4}{8}\cdot\frac22}$
until its squarable
Biscuity
right of course
easy!
try writing them in × and ÷ with
in case you are stuck with fractions
e.g.
(2/4)/6
we can write it as
(2÷4)÷6
i see i see
and now, given that you are familiar with brackets operations, we can express it into
2÷4÷6
or
$\frac24÷6$
Biscuity
Biscuity
@mighty flume Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mighty flume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this enough info or do they need all sides distance
seems fine
Word has an equation editor I think if you want to play with that but you don't need to
ok ty
but like
its a rhombus
ive done left and right
do i need to do top and bottom too or
Show the image
We don't know what top/bottom/left/right mean
did they tell you it's a rhombus?
@rain bluff Has your question been resolved?
that does not look like a rhombus to me at all
,w rhombus
@rain bluff Has your question been resolved?
i am dumb
looking at my assignment
i actually wrote that it was a paralellogram
sigh
Yeah they would need all sides
An isosceles trapezoid is an example of a shape with only one pair of opposite parallel sides
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So ( ((1)/(x+y)) - ((1)/(x)))/(y)
Can be simplified with some common denominator thing but I don’t rly understand it. Like I get how you can rewrite the top part of the fraction to -y/(x+y) but in the video I’m watching they write (1/y)*((x-(x+y))/((x+y)x)
I don’t get what they are doing
I think it has something to do with the fraction they write before it but I don’t get how they just get rid of the top fraction
Oh sorry should I use the help forums ?
$\frac{1}{x+y} - \frac{\frac{1}{x}}{y}$ This is the expression you're starting with?
tatpoj
@mild crypt
Waif I found notes
So ye I guess this is a shortcut then right? I guess it does look easier tho lol
I understand the notes a lot better like I understand every step I just don’t get how you can get the value that is infront if the thing in the first step. Is that just gotten by multiplying the denominator of the top parts?
Idk it still feels a bit weird
Like I get the steps but
value in front of the thingi n the first step?
Its weird how you write something that’s literally 1 *
oh you mean the (x0)((x0 + deltax) over itself on the third line?
Yeah it's so you can cancel the denominator of the numerator
Instead, you could just combine the two fractions in the numerator by making a common denominator
it's the same thing
it's the GCF of the denominators in the numerator
Like I could Do the top part seperatly and get something similar but it would be (-dx /(x0+dx) ) / dx
cancel those dx's and you're right at the end
that's equivalent to the last line in your picture
How can I cancel them
Its like
A fraction inside a fraction
Idk how to rhen cancel the numerator of the numerator with the denominator of the big fraction
Think back to middle school, how would you simplify any fraction like that?
These are variables but it works the same way
as something like (2/3) / 4
or whatever
Im in highschool and I never got that 💀
Uhhhh
Haha no worries
Like multiply i guess
$\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}{d}} = \frac{a}{b} \cdot \frac{d}{c}$
tatpoj
Oh ye I never got that 🤣
Dividing by any number is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal
Ah
or 2/5 and 5/2
Ye
or in your case, dx and 1/dx
Yes wait can you like do that math thing so I can visualize
For like the method I did
Idk how that works
from here, right?
Yep
$\frac{\frac{-\Delta x}{x_0 + \Delta x}}{\Delta x}$
eh, it doesn't show up well but the dx at the bottom is the "whole" denominator
also I forgot a negative lol
tatpoj
Ye
You're dividing by dx, which is the same as multiplying by 1/dx
Ah so you’ll just do -dx * dx
So -1
Ah and then you get -1/x0+dx?
Wait no I think that’s wrong tho
$\frac{-\Delta x}{x_0 + \Delta x} \cdot \frac{1}{\Delta x}$
tatpoj
Ye what
That’s different
Becuase you can divide the too bu dx to get the -1
But then you have a *dx missing in the bottom
oh you're missing a factor of x0 in the denominator
can you show your work on how you got here?
NVM ye that is what you get if you do the top part properly
I messed that up XD just did it quick on my phone
haha i didnt' notice it was missing either, looked right at first
Here it looks like you can also divide the very top with the very bottom and take the middle as the new bottom tho
That is also true, yes
Ok well tyvm! I understand now and can probably do it in the future myself now ^^ altho maybe I should practice like 2 more 🤣 imma sleep now tho idk why I’m doing math at 00:30 midnight
$\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{c} = \frac{\frac{a}{c}}{b} = \frac{a}{bc}$
tatpoj
no problem 👍
Uh what
But if I multiply that with opposite
1/c * b/a rhats b/ac not a/bc @wooden wraith
you only flip the denominator
$\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{c} = \frac{a}{b} \cdot \frac{1}{c} = \frac{a}{bc}$
tatpoj
Nothing is flipped there
huh?
There is nothing flipped tho
the reciprocal of c is 1/c
yes, a more general form would be $\frac{a/b}{c/d} = \frac{a}{b} \cdot \frac{d}{c}$
tatpoj
Oh ye fair that’s what you did here too
Ye in my mind you just took it and put it down a level lower
Its nice to visualize it makes sense like
Damn that’s pretty easy
Ok I’ll practice some more but I think I got it
Thank you again 🙏
np 👍
@mild crypt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is the answer D?
I thought for the formula for inverse trig sin,
its sin^-1 (u/a) + C
but where did the 1/3 come from
because you take out the 9 from the square root, which becomes sqrt(9(4/9-x^2))
and sqrt9 = 3, and its on the bottom so when you take it out you get a 1/3
@glass plume Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @glass plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
hello
$\text{for small }\frac{s}{r_0}: \ \frac{1}{(r_0+s)^3}\approx\frac{1}{r_0^3}-\frac{3s}{r_0^4}+...$
Martin
in a previous exam someone had to use this
can someone explain how we can derive this?
my first guess would be taylor
but then i wouldnt know if we would differentiate with respect to r or s
[r0(1+s/r0)]^3
this shows how we get the first term, but how do we get the second?
nvm got it
thx^^
.close
Closed by @left robin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
can you show
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @left robin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
hello
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just wanted to make sure if my working is correct
Sorry if handwriting sucky just ask if something is unclear 
i mean yeah it is correct
laplace transform of cos(at) is a standard result
and you did end up with exactly that
Great nice
hiii
Another question just for clarification on another question
What do they mean by "use the linearity of the Laplace transform" exactly
no clue, idk where you can even use linearity here
Hmmm
I should probably include the full thing here
Do they just mean to like
Split up the integral?
Yes
yeah
they want you to use the exponential definition
and then find the laplace transform of each
So the integral for the cos one should match the one I found thru ibp
sure
Oh why not multiply g(t) by a constant too?
you can lol
idk why the picture didn't include it
but yeah basically they want you to find the laplace transform of e^{ibt}/2 and e^{-ibt}/2
then linearity is trivial
Fair enough let me try it
Hmm so
I get [
\map F s = \f1{2i} \bracks{\int_0^\infty e^{t(ib-s)} \dd t -\int_0^\infty e^{-t(ib+s)}\dd t}
]
I'm guessing that's the point?
Yes, and these are easy integrals to solve
Wait am I tripping but doesn't the first integral just diverge
No, note that the real part is negative
Oh huh, I never really tackled with complex integrals but I assume we ignore the imaginary part when we take the limit?
No, just work with i as if it's a number
But $\lim_{a\to\infty} e^{-a + bi} = \lim_{a\to\infty}e^{-a} \left( \cos(b) + i\sin(b)\right)$
DAILI
And cos and i*sine are bounded in size by 1 so it goes to zero
since the decaying exponential dominates
Ohh I see this makes a lot of sense ty
Hmmm
So all in all
[
\map F s = \f1{2i} \bracks{\f1{ib-s}+ \f1{ib+s}}
]
Fingers crossed I didn't mess it up lmfao
I think you're off by a minus sign
Since it's - the antideriv at 0
Could be wrong though
Oh right I see why
I think it's like
- for both
And we pull it out
Wait well
,w Laplace transform of sin(at)
,w a/(a^2 +s^2) = -1/(2i) (1/(ia-s) + 1/(ia+s))
Closed by @worthy tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Should expected and observed frequencies match in the table ?
@untold vector Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @untold vector
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how in the world do I find this
@void lance Has your question been resolved?
why not just plug in 100 into the formula?
wdym ?
you have a function that gives cost right?
so if i asked you for the cost if t = 50 you could calculate it
Ah I see
Another question rq too
I couldn't understand how to solve this one bc there's no x intercept
at the origin?
@void lance Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @void lance
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there a free tutor here?
this is a video of the creator of the question doing it
He explains how to do the question roughly but doesn't actually do it because he runs out of time
but I don't see how he gets the answer in the show that part of iii)
that makes cos theta = 1/2 / root7/4
which makes 2 arccos 1/2 / root7/4 the angle of the sector, because theta is half of the angle
which is not what he got, he got 1/root7 ,which as he says in the video you should get if you do the question the way I just showed, as the angle.
Also another question I have is I know that 7pi/4 is the area of the entire circle, and that the angle is one I have gotten wrong, but I don't get why the 1/180 degrees, and also that if you calculate it by area of circle * portion of sector proportional to the entire circle you get the area of the sector, not the triangle they have in question
so I was wondering if you did it with 1/2absinc but you get sin as a result so it couldn't be that.
PS. the question is a non-calculator paper
@onyx grove Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@onyx grove Has your question been resolved?
$\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{\sqrt{\frac{7}{4}}}=\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{\sqrt 7}{2}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt 7}$
Civil Service Pigeon
You could convert between sin and cos by drawing a right triangle and interpreting geometrically tho
Pretty sure the website is just wrong cause here’s the original paper
At least if I’m interpreting you correctly
Run-on sentences are hard to understand
ohhh I see
where did the pi go in the answer
How would I use the 1/2 ab sin c rule if I have c in terms of cos c
also when it says it is bounded by the arc, does it mean the straight line from A to B or does it mean the curved circumference of the circle from A to B
so I have the cos-1 1/root7 as half of the angle required, so why doesn't it multiply the angle by 2 and where did the pi on 7/4 go.
This is in the case if you think the arc AB is the curved circle line from A to B which I'm not sure it is
Nvm I’m dumb
The idea is to convert 1/180 deg to radians probably
Idk why that’s there but ig that’s a “modification”
Pythagorean
Curved circumference
Why do they have 1/180 degrees in the first place
I thought the formula for area of a sector is just =area of circle * proportion of angle compared to full circle
Oh yeah, I would just get the angle in terms of sin instead, but the answer is in terms of cos which is my question, if I get some 1/2 ab sin c answer how would I change it to cos without a calculator, it would be something really messy
If they were to translate it to radians it would not cancel out the 7pi/4 as radians is simply a measure of degrees and is not actually any value of area, so it would not interact with the 7pi/4 and would only be inside the arccos
Which is why I am confused because why is there a measure of degrees outside of the arccos
This trigonometry video tutorial explains how to find the exact value of the five remaining trigonometric functions given one trig function and the sign of another. You need to identify the quadrant in which the angle lies in and use right triangle trigonometry to find the exact value of the other trig functions.
You do you ig
I gave you my interpretation
You’re free to take it or leave it
Sorry I wasn't trying to be a dick just confused about the question
thank you for the help though it does clear quite a bit up
i'll try again to figure it out tommorow
.close
Closed by @onyx grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there some formula im supposed to use for this question
cus i have no idea how to approach it
P(A U B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A and B)
for events that are not mutually exclusive
if they are then P(A U B) = P(A) + P(B)
do you know how to calculate P(A and B)
@sharp citrus ?
Closed by @sharp citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I calculate the horizontal shift for a function like this?
@stark shuttle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,,13^{2019}\mod 95
I've used fermat's to obtain 13^4 = 1 mod 5 and 13^18 = 1 mod 19
but idk where to go from there
.close
Closed by @cursive totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Am i reading this problem correctly?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @exotic vortex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have to find the equation of a plave which passes through x axis and (3,2,4) point
☠️
☠️
💀
anyway it's 2b + 4c = 0 not 2b + 4z = 0
@uncut crow your PFP😂
Yes
what about it 
you can now find b and c
take one of them as whatever you want (except 0) and find the value of the other one
U meant 2b=-4c ?
do the same thing we did yesterday only with (0,0,0) and (3,2,4) as your two points
Now it's done🤦
i don't want to repeat myself with different numbers
Closed by @wooden axle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
dont even know how to start this i plug in -1 on top and get 3.45... but idk what to do in the bottom
@past laurel Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
That's very small
@past laurel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @past laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to find the equation of a plane which passes through middle point (3,-2,1)(1,4,-3)
There are infinite planes passing through a single point.
What do you mean?
We need to find the equation of place which is perpendicular to these points and passes through the middle point
Do you understand hindi?
Plane perpendicular to a point? What does that even mean? 😐
Sure. Go ahead.
Even now, if they want plane passing through perpendicular bisector of that line segment, there are infinite such planes.
However, if angle between line and plane has to be 90°, then it has a unique plane.
Middle point and x,y,z then direction ratio will be 2-x,1-y,-1-z and dot product with normal(1,-3,2) will be zero
Well, it's even simpler. In the second case that i mentioned, perpendicular vector to plane is in same direction as this line.
Just put value of middle point and solve for constant.
How is normal (1, -3, 2)?
Check your thinking again.
I'll be back in a few minutes.
Ah. You took with midpoint. That's correct.
I am confused about whether I do dot products or cross?
@wooden axle Has your question been resolved?
@wooden axle Has your question been resolved?
I think you need 2 vectors for cross product, you only found a single vector that passes through both points
Given vector (a,b,c) that is perpendicular to a plane, can you type the formula for that plane
Hint: take two arbitrary points on the plane, find a vector that passes through both points on the plane, and lastly take dot product of these vectors , since one vector is perpendicular to other, it should be equal to 0
See
I guess this is correct
That vector will be our normal vector yes
You can type the formula of plane from that
This is already done. What are you confused about now?
Why i didn't try the cross product
Do you know the purpose of cross product?
Why we use it
Its used to find a normal/perpendicular vector to our current 2 existing vectors
Here we only have 1 vector
Plus our vector is already a normal to the plane we are trying to find
So that we can get a perpendicular vector
Exactly
Do we need to do that when we already have one though
If it was given two points of plane
You need like at least 3 points to take cross product
On 3 points?
Yes
It wouldnt be perpendicular to every point then
Ohh now i got it the loophole
Here we are taking all the points because it is in x,y,z form so all points included
So dot product is making sense
Lets say you have points P, Q and R
Then to find perpendicular vector you need to take 2 vectors whose union contains all these points, so i will take the vectors PQ and QR,
( but you can also do it like: PR and PQ or PR and QP, however you'd like)
Then i take cross product of PQ and QR => |PQ x QR|
Reminder that cross product is perpendicular to the vectors it consists so
|PQ x QR| . PQ = 0
|PQ x QR| . QR = 0
Actually dot product isnt needed for your question if you know the shortcut
Shortcut i mean is this
But its derived from the dot product way, i think
So far your work is like this @wooden axle
I typed equation of the plane from the shortcut, but longer way to do is by taking points $P=(x_0,y_0,z_0)$ , $Q=(x,y,z)$ and constructing $$\overrightarrow{PQ}$$ which is normal to vector $\vec{n}$
Cyrenux
We can take a point P as middle point
By middle point are you referring the to point between (3,-2,1) and (2,1,-1)
Ah i see, my bad
The vector you typed still passes through it, so we are good i think
After typing the equation of plane
We can find term d, by using the fact that middle point should satisfy the plane since plane is passing through it
Suppose we have to find a plane equation and we are given a point perpendicular to plane, 2points on plane what will we do cross product?
<@&286206848099549185>
What do you even mean by a point perpendicular to plane ?
Like in this
There is no 'point perpendicular to plane'
Question
Its a vector that is perpendicular to a plane who consists the point
Write in Hindi.
Mera sawal hain
Agar ek plane ka equation nikalna hain and hamko diya hain
Ek point (3,-2,1) jo plane k upr hain aur 2 points plane ka upr hain (2,-1,1) and (4,-5,2)
@manic condor
Perpendicular point makes no sense to me.
Do you mean that (3,-2,1) is lying above the plane ?
Or somewhere out of the plane(not on the plane) ?
Yes
Out of the plane and above
Give me the idea how will cross/dot product will happen here?
That plane you drew seems random, what was your idea with it?
It seems like you want to find a plane which consists these 3 points
I guess here we will do cross product
Yeah its forced kinda
We will find vector PQ and QR then cross product
And cross product will make all the points of the plane
Cross product, which you will evaluate is the vector that will be perpendicular to plane, if cross product is (a,b,c) then equation of plane is ax + by + cz + d = 0
Since cross product, who is perpendicular to the vectors who consists the points P Q R, the plane who is perpendicular to the cross product, will in fact contain these 3 points
After finding equation of plane you can insert one of the points
To find value; d
That doesnt seem to contain the point P
So here PQ like perpendicular to the plane
Also i can already see that you are trying to say P perpendicular to the plane, but that is like the most illegal thing ever, in a way its like saying two points are perpendicular which makes no sense
We will do dot product
You can say that P is a point on a normal vector
Yes
There are many planes that include points R and Q
But i believe there is only one plane that contains P Q and R
We need 2 vectors for it, NOT a plane and vector
We can take PQ and QR or QP and QR or ... etc
Oh i see an issue with your take
PQ is not perpendicular to that plane
You already know points P, Q and R, evaluate PQ and QR
Since Q and R are in the plane so is the vector QR, but notice that PQ . QR is not 0
hello everyone , what are the coordinates of P,Q,R?
Both pictures are different
P is perpendicular in last picture
Here are the points P Q and R
In the first picture p is not perpendicular so we choose only cross product
Point P cannot be perpendicular
Because points cannot be perpendicular
In the second picture it is perpendicular so we can use cross product and dot product both that's my doubt
I meant PQ straight line is perpendicular
To what
To the plane
Its not
I am stating it is
I just explained why its not
The numbers you picked dont satisfy such conditition
is this the second picture that you are talking about ?
then no $\vec{PQ}$ isnt perp to the plane containing Q and R
calculus is fun
But in the second picture PQ.QR and PQ×QR both are possible or not that's my doubt because PQ perpendicular to QR
try $\vec{PQ}.\vec{QR}$
calculus is fun
can you try this
Seriously i need help in Hindi to be sure when we do cross and dot and in which situation we can use both products
They said its irrevelant from the values they posted earlier
Is there no situation where we can do both products?
when you try this you will see that $\vec{PQ}$ isnt perpendicular to the plane that you showed in the picture
calculus is fun
The picture he sent is irrevelant to his previous one so not same values
I am saying it is perpendicular
I don't want shortcuts
If you dont want shortcut just do cross product then why bother to see their dot product is 0
look if the dot product is 0 then you get the equation of the plane directly
if the dot product is not 0 then you use the cross product to get a normal vector of the plane ( a vector perpendicular to the plane) then you get the dot product between a vector in the plane and the result of the cross product to get the equation of the plane
If the dot product is 0, does plane contain all P Q R or only Q and R or only P
i am saying that if P is a point outside the plane containing Q and R and PQ.QR = 0 then you can directly get the equation of the plane
but no matter what points P Q and R you choose you can always put them in the same plane
so as long as you choose 3 points you can always find a plane that contains all 3 points
which plane
I see
MVT
