#help-27
1 messages · Page 90 of 1
there we go
now with radius
use it to find area
remember
so area of circle is pi*(radius^2)
so pi * (p/2pi)^2
so we simplifiy to p^2/4pi
so ratio square:cirlce
is (p^2/16):(p^2/4pi)
You lost me
so area of circle is pi*r^2
right?
Uh
Yea
so already know the radius is p/2pi
now we plug it in
p*(p/2pi)^2
you got it?
Can we start over 😭
take picture of paper work
start writing stuff down
Ok but can we start over
yes
I will start
Ok but wait
So the perimeter of a square is 4(1/4p)
And the perimeter of a circle is r^2?
draw it
draw out a square
and a circle
no
P/4^2?
Okay so do I need to write that?
yep
thats ur final solution for the area of the square
So it should be like this?
Circle is r^2?
no
okay
lets write these 2 things down
Area of circle = πr^2
Perimeter of circle = 2πr
r is the radius of the circle
YES
ur right
Wait what now
2πr = p
Oh ok
its just a variable
Ok continue
Yea
subsititude r into the area formula
you can
yep
now you can cancel the π
with one of the π in the demoniator
so its just (p^2)/(4π)
@final drum I don’t understand
take this
y(x/y)
what is that
X
Wait did I do it wrong
u
forgot the
^2
on the bottom of the demoniator
look
what you do (x/y)^2
the ^2 applies to the top and bottom
so x^2/y^2
Wait was I supposed to multiple top by tip bottom by bottom?
what?
just go back to π(p/2π)(p/2π)
Wait
put the π
Pause
yes
So in this situation- top by top bottom by bottom?
what does that mean
which ever means πp^2/4π^2
Multiply like that?
Ok
now
Now do the same thing again?
Okay. And the area of the square is a^2 right.
I made some changes
Because I wasn’t understanding
That perim should be 4a
Wait
It’s 4a
what is a
A side
That’s right then yea?
okay
Now what
now just write down the solution
…
area of circle : area of square
I thought I said area of square is a^2
yes
but u cannot leave that as the solution
they cannot find the ratio
if you given them a random variable
So what do I do
you ahve to include the perimeter
I don’t understand
if i ask you to find teh area of a square
and given you the length of a car
will that work?
Bro what
😭😭😭😭
to find the area
but ur given
😭😭😭
Well I’m trying to understand why I’m doing what I’m doing bruh
okay
given the perimeter
of a square
The formula for the area of the square is a^2
P/4
P/4^2
^2 applies to the p too
How and why
(p/4)^2 = (p/4)(p/4)
Understood but I don’t need to write p^2 then
simpleist form
there we go
now area of circle : area of square
Yeah why?
no wounder
How did you know?
i also go to school in canada
and teachers are stupid
and they cannot teach
okay, did you write that in solutions
your done
But this is the not the final answer in the answer key.
what is the answer
4:pi
its the same
they just cancelled the p^2/4
form both side
its the same
its like how 1+1 and 2 is the same thing
How do i get their answer
what r u doing
what
divide both sides by p^2/4
(p^2/4)/(p^2/4) = 1/pi
(p^2/16)/(p^2/4)=1/4
1/pi:1/4
What?
4/4pi is 1/pi
Bru what
multiply both sides by 4pi
Why thi?
You mean lowest common denominator?
yes
no
cancel out the pi with the pi
on teh left side
and with the right side cancel 4 with 4
don't
That took ages
What?
No I need a high mark
I need to know how to do this
you will not
you cannot even do basic arithmetic
i am not trying to be mean
and chances are
its not going to be on the test
what course is this?
functions?
Pre calculus 11
I don’t even see how this question relates to the chapter
thats whats its called in ontario
This is a 1 off question
it doesn't
It’s very odd I don’t see how/why it’s in the chapter review
its not
I think they might put 1 of these on the tedt
average garbage highschool textbook
its not
i alr took grade 11 math
its not
So you think I shouldn’t spend time on it?
they are not even slightly related
no
at least not for this stupid question
if u rly want to
just
understand it
Yeah this is the Linesr systems chapter
and do it a few more times
okay no way thats related
THATS WHAT IM SAYING
u done with the help?
Well unless you want to help me practice another one
no thanks
i have work due tmr
Okay
.close
Closed by @final drum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Bye! Thanks so much for your help!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In an undirected weighted graph, where all edge weights are distinct, the two cheapest edges belong to some minimum spanning tree.
if the 2 cheapest edges are the two that form the circle
it won’t be in the same mst
@agile narwhal
That's true
Thanks, I could not find any counterexample
@agile narwhal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @agile narwhal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I struggle to make a formal proof out of number (ii). I made a table to find out if they are equal and they are, but how do formulate that correctly? Can i just make 7 cases and show each of them seperately? Or is there a better method?
Or should i try to proof that the left side is a subset of the right and that the right side is a subset of the left and they are thus equal?
@agile sentinel Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I dont know if you can read that but i tried it like this. Is there a faster method than doing each case?
You're tryna' to derive that the symmetric difference is associative?
Yes
Aight
okay well i can't really go through it since it's been a while since i've touched up on set theory but you could just search up a formal proof
Please Subscribe here, thank you!!! https://goo.gl/JQ8Nys
The Symmetric Difference is Associative Proof Video. This is video 3 on Binary Operations.
i'm unsure if there's a quick way
but you have to consider all cases
Okay then i think i will leave it at that. I need to do (iii) next, do you have any tips or should i just try it myself first?
hmm
i'm unsure i'm not thinkin abt it rn as i'm eating dinner but if you don't have a response by the time i'm done i'll check on you
Ok i will try it myself first
Im not sure if the last step is allowed or if i should make it more clear why x is element of (a\b)u(b\a) (instead of \ my book uses -)
,rotate
The Problem says: Let n be a natural number and let a_1,...,a_n be sets such that a_1 is superset (or equal) of a_2 and so on up to a_n. Then for even n (i) is true and for odd n (ii) is true. My first idea was induction but i dont think that works (also the book hasn't introduced it yet. Is it enough if i proof it for an arbitrary a_k such that k=2n for (i) and k=2n+1 for (ii) ?
For n=4 the equation becomes a_1-a_2-a_3-a_4=a_1-(a_2-(a_3-a_4)) a_4 is not in (a_3-a_4) but it is in a_2 since a_4 is a subset of a_2 and thus it is in (a_2-(a_3-a_4) and thus is not in a_1-(a_2-(a_3-a_4)) since a_1 includes every element of a_2.By the same logic you can find that a_(4-1) is in a_1-(a_2-(a_3-a_4)) etc. and so you have (a_1-a_2)u(a_3-a_4)=a_1-a_2-a_3-a_4
Is that a valid approach?
@agile sentinel Has your question been resolved?
I skipped the last problem but i have a question for the next one: i got {0} here instead of {}, did i do something wrong/misunderstood something?
I understood it that the set of wich i have to take the Intersection of is {{0},{0,1},{0,1,2},...} Or did i misunderstand it?
For any set a out of M, 0 has to always be part of a since m greater or equal to 0 is always true for any m out of the natural Numbers. Im supposed to arrive at the empty set though, so what did i miss?
@agile sentinel Has your question been resolved?
@agile sentinel Has your question been resolved?
@agile sentinel Has your question been resolved?
@agile sentinel Has your question been resolved?
@agile sentinel Has your question been resolved?
My question hasn't been resolved btw
is this currently the question you are asking about?
Yeah
And the 2nd one on this screenshot
Do you know why {0} isnt the right solution? I want to understand this
what is (i)
what does it say in English?
The equation is the same in english as in german, it says "the following equation is true:" but i cant really proof why
For even n the equation holds that a_1-...-a_n=(a_1-a_2)u...u(a_(n-1)-a_n) btw instead of - the notation \ is also used
0 is defined as being the empty set
Oh so there is no difference between {0} and {} ?
No, because {0} is {{}} ≠ {} = 0
Then i dont understand what you mean
wait no, both are different?
Oh nvm i get it
0 := {}
So when i have the intersection of a set i dont have to put the answer as a set, right?
Or atleast if it is only one answer
the intersection of two sets is always a set
No its not of 2 sets but of one set
what is the intersection of one set?
Let me find the name in english im not sure
This thing. Its not the intersection of one set but of one system of sets
But i thought the equation holds for 0 so why do i write the empty set instead of {0}
because {0} is the set containing a single element, 0
i.e. 0 is part of every such set
Can you explain why not?
give me an example of set which contains natural numbers
the natural number starts with 1,2,3
yeah, consider e.g. {1, 2, 3}. 0 is not in that set
yes
if you intersect {1,2,3} with {5,6,7}
the intersection will be ø
Ø represents nothing
Not with 0?
0 is part of whole numbers
some authors will consider 0 a natural number, but I think most would not
but that's second the thing
I think i get it. What i previously thought it meant was that you take some m out of the natural numbers and then every n less than or equal to m is part of a set, then you take the intersection of every set with m from 0 to infinity
Well my book clearly defined 0 as a natural number "The natural Numbers shall contain the Element 0" ( i dunno if thats the right translation)
are you referring to a specific problem?
cool
uh
Yes this one the blue thing
that's fine, I've seen another book that includes 0 as a natural number. but it is irrelevant to your confusion about the empty set
K
in exams, just go with your book (incase asked in exams regarding natural numbers or whole number)
I see. the blue one can be tricky. but it looks like it is taking the intersection over all n
This is the problem in question
I dont understand how {1,2,3} is in that set that you take the intersection of
it was just an example
to make you understand that 0 is an element and can/cannot be in every sets
so it's taking the intersection of {0, 1, 2, ...} with {1, 2, 3, ...} with {2, 3, 4, ...} and so on. do you see how the intersection over all sets constructed in that way will be empty?
I see. I thought this notation meant the sets {0}, {0,1}, {0,1,2} etc.
no, it would be the set of all natural numbers greater than/equal to "n", for a given "n". I assume that it is "iterating" over all "n", even though it isn't clear to me in the notation
Oh okay, i thought it was the other way around. Thanks for clarifying.
Can you help me with this one?
So i would just say, if there were a k out of the natural numbers such that k is in everyone of those sets, choose n=k+1 and you will reach a contradiction, right?
yes I think that's right
Ok i think i will try the other one myself and leave it out in case i cant do it. Thanks for the help @frosty cradle and others.
.close
Closed by @agile sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for 11 do u have to find an equation for x in terms of y
I would've assumed y in terms of x probably
Closed by @lofty monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
calculate the circulation
The thing I get lost over in this exercise is when I go to polar form
i get x=cos(t) and y=sin(t)
Because it's a unit circle, and therefor r=1, right?
the solution:
@steel escarp Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @steel escarp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
So
I have a doubt in simplifying this
Then cut
So u rationalise it
The cut it
But none of them are the options
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Right
Just write √8 as 2√2 lol
Bruh
What
It's ok
?
Your work is alright
It's 2√8 -2√2
How do I make it 2√2
Just write √8 = 2√2 and simplify 2(√8-√2)
What I did not get it
$\sqrt 8 = \sqrt{4 \times 2} = 2\sqrt 2$
NEONPerseus
8 is cibe root of 2
well yes
Ty
Lemme complete n send
I did not get it cuz i was thinking in the cube way
Forgot it was root 🌚
Problem solved
I have a doubt in this
How do u do 8
Have you tried anything?
I am not getting the image of what to do
simplify this one first
You don't have to worry about signs because a is to the cube.
Yes
2/3 is outside the root
no
I simply like this?
so the first one is the correct
a^3/2
but that's also raised to other thing if u check the exercise
Wait what
I did not get the second one
the second one is wrong, it's what you wrote in the first place
Ohhh my bad
if base > 0 you are free to multiply
ok so u got what
6/6
which is
A?
Omg
now this one
what do u mean?
If it is b^2/4
Can I write it is b^1/2
Meaning cutting out the factors
That is how we got a
you can sometimes
Uh
when the base is bigger than 0
we assume that
This ain't in my text
But it is in my practise book
So i may be a bit slow
So now we got first term as a
yes, but always assuming a>0
We simplify inside the root first?
in the second one?
you can do the other way
from outside to inside
yes
you would have what raised to what raised to what
((a^4)^(1/3))^(1/12) like this, right?
Ye ye
what do u get
1/36
so now we have (a^4)^(1/36)
now here we have 2 different approaches
if we assume a>0, than you already solved it
a^(1/9) which is what you said
How do I prove x
Smh managed this bro
you had something before that
More complex?
Lemme write steps now
come on, we alsmot finished
Almost done sorry
Remember we always assume a>0, if not, some things are not complete
i don't know about classes, how old are u?
I can't reveal that
ok
💀
keep finishing
Ok so
I leaerned real no 1 month back
So based on that u can say right
I learned irrational like 3 weeks back
Lemme see my text rq
Yep no no has negative
Ok let's finish
Lemme post my steps
ok
yes
How do I do that now uhh
do you know how much is x^2 * x^2?
?
just a quick question
Can u write it in the maths way
Ye
now this is because it's a product
U said property i said the way
Ye
no
I was dumb ahh
careful with parenthesis
Writing in chat is hard for me
it's ok
so we got
Lemme write steps
Man i feel so good
I got like hella problems rest to do but whateber
I could have done 5 simple ones
You didn't finish yet
Can you finish it from here?
Idk the step
Okk
The thing is
I told u
First time
I don't know any method or steps
Hmm
How uhh
this are examples
not your exercise
so you can use this hints to solve your exercise
whatever u do in one side u do in the other
I know this
so you have to eliminate 8/9 in your a
I did it to find
and give that to the x
yes
because if you multiply 8/9 and 9/8 you get 1
Yep i knew rhay
Sooo
I do that with the x but that is not our
Answer
It is in root
remember denominator is root
Ohhh
a^(1/2) = sqrt(a)
yep
go for them
Lemme send the steps
Wait
In the question it is not whole raised to
The 9 is also in the root
The property is diferent
explain what do u mean
Man i can't text ahhhh
The properlty
Is
The number on top is whole raised to
That is after the root
In the exercise it is inside the toot
Root
you have this, right?
Yes
if it were 1/2
Just write root
Yes
that's this
Yes
No i learned the property as
we don't put it because it's not necessary, but it's there
the root takes the number in the denominator
(√x)1
x takes the number in the numerator
it's the same when we assume it's possitive
Nvm
you can try with a number
It it is positive i can write inside root?
yes
Omg
if it's negative it doesn't work
you'll reach to that later
I thought both made a difference
now don't worry about it
Man when i come to this server
I feel like i have decades more to learn to learn maths
we all do
Now time to do 20 problems lol
go for it
Could have asked an excuse to my maths teachers saying this was too tough
And did 20 problems
But what is the use of that loo
We study to learn
correct
Not for showing others
Hold up
Lemme
Just clear this tint doubt
I just gotta rationalise it right
Then i get x and y
?
the good thing about this is that you have to try what you think it's the steps to solve it
and if that's true
you will feel better than if I say to you the answer
Oh
yes, try and if u get more questions open a new one
because if I leave nobody will see this channel
cause was opened long time ago
type .close
.close
Closed by @keen solar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any hints/thoughts on this?
I'm unable to figure out a geometrical interpretation and a "x + iy" sub just messes things up
try using the triangle inequality
on the LHS, right?
yeah
yup
this does give me the minimum value, thank you
I'm guessing a similar approach for maximum?
wait nvm sorry I don't why im asking too many ques
I'll try it
isnt this a multi choice question?
hm ok
yes
|z| + 2 ≥ | |z|^2 - 1|
the approach here is to square on both sides, right?
ah that does work
thank you
.close
Closed by @celest tide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have biquadratic equation, where a belongs to set of real numbers..
ok.. i solved it.
but there's one detail:
x² = a², a is in R set of numbers
this equation is equivalent to
x = +-sqrt(a²)
x = +- abs( a ) , because a is in R set
x = +-a
Correct?
If a were just greater than zero, a>0 then we wouldn't have abs parenthesis.
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
because I have +- in front of a?
@flat rain thanks! (:
👍
Closed by @wispy chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey everyone. I could need some help solving this Quantum mechanics task. I figured that eventhough it is physics related, this question is more mathematical than of physical difficulty. Could somebody indicate to me how to approach this question?
Translation of the text above :
"The adjunct of an operator Â, that operates on Hilbertraum H, is denoted as  dagger and can be defined as follows:
....
for arbitrary vectors phi-ket and theta-ket in H. The star * denotes the complex conjugate of a complex number z. Use the definition above to show that for the Operators Â,^B, that operate on H, holds:
...."
Use the fact that (AB)^dagger = B^dagger A^dagger
Im not sure this holds here, because neither phi-ket nor phi-bra (behaves like a linear functional) are Operators.
but they are vectors
A and B are in general, matrices
where A is m x n and B is n x p. Here it is valid for B to be a vector where p = 1
I can see what you mean in a finite dimensional space. But this space in its general form is not finite dimensional. Also, I am a bit afraid to use operator rules for my bras and kets, as quite some emphasis is put onto the difference between operators, bras and kets 😄
But thank you anyways 🙂
Fair enough but I believe it still holds
bras are just vectors in a Hilbert space
kets are vectors in the dual space
not sure about the operators but I believe they hold
I.e. not sure what "space" they belong to
specifically covector
hmm ok. Given that I can not find a solid reason why this should not work, I'll use it 😄 thanks again!
.close
Closed by @native oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help, I really don't want to get it wrong. I have one last attempt on this question
What I did is multiply both sides by cos-1
so I got
$$theta=cos-1(-0.7986)$$
?
dasa
to get theta alone
ohh, you mean you took the inverse
I thought you literally multiplied by cos(-1) lol