#help-27
1 messages · Page 80 of 1
hey i knew that!
why is that the case, though?
In which case it's also common to write it Fp
because the two nontrivial factors of a composite are nonzero but multiply to 0 in Z_n
so that means not all nonzero elements are invertible
there's a b such that ab = 1 [n] iff there's b, k such that ab + kn = 1, i.e. iff a and n are coprime
which is true for all a in {1, ..., n-1} if and only if n is prime
also all finite integral domains are fields
i shouldnt have asked. i'm so far behind in linalg i'm barely hanging on. you guys r inspirations tho.
thanks for the help ;-;
it's okay, we've been doing math for a while
while we're here though, if you don't mind..
i've asked this before and i still don't get it
why is 2^-1=3 in Z_5
:C
i don't know how to find inverses
THEY DIDNT EVEN TELL US
because 3*2 = 6 ≡ 1 [5]
since all addition and multiplication is done modulo 5 by definition, you have 3*2=1 in ℤ₅
btw this tells you how to find inverses for high values of p by euclid's algorithm
but for small p, it can be faster to just try them all
As for how to find them, since it's a very small finite field, you can just try elements until one of them gives 1 modulo 5
likewise, 4*4 = 16 = 15 + 1 ≡ 1 [5]
look up something like
euclid's algorithm for solving Bezout's equation
if you're interested
(that's is unrelated btw, you don't need to know this here)
as we said
okay something about this i'm just not getting lol.
why does this tell me 2^-1=3 in Z_5?
the multiplicative identity is 1
what's the definition of an inverse ?
ok well you seem to be at it already i'll leave you to it
It depends on field
it doesn't exist in every Zn
because of this
It needs to be Zp
For 2 but does it have inverse for all elements then?
we already went over this
welcome to the party 🙂
let's keep it to one helper

THATS THE SPIRIT
especially when trying to be a helper at 1 am
it didn't work out so well
but it's not 1 am rn so we're good
YEEHAW
so here we go
they say here 2^-1 = 3
i'm assuming that means in Z_5, right?
i feel like you've already explained, but i don't understand
how do you perform that computation?
you just notice that 3 works
because 2*3 = 6 = 1 [5]
after having tried 1 and 2, which didn't work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shaQZg8bqUM i think this is what you've been trying to explain
This tutorial shows how to find the inverse of a number when dealing with a modulus. When dealing with modular arithmetic, numbers can only be represented as integers ranging from 0 to ( the modulus minus 1 ). This tutorial shows one method that can be used when solving for an inverse of modular arithmetic.
Join this channel to get access to p...
i just needed it to be explained like i'm a baby
that's the euclid algorithm version
for when trying every possible number is too long
but it's a lot more computational and harder than just trying every number from 1 to 4
so a very bad idea for n = 5
hmm..
because 2 is invertible, you know its inverse exists
is it 1 ? that makes 2 so no
2 ? 2*2 = 4 so no
3 ? 2*3 = 6 = 1 [5] so yes
so you're asking what gives me a remainder of 1?
yes
a definitely of an inverse is something with the remainder of 1???????
you know Zp is a field but didn't study basic structures ?
like groups and rings ?
i swear they taught us nothing about doing computations in fields in this course.
i'm a first year student and it's for linear algebra
yay US curriculum
canada* 😛
meh
same thing
the french one is very good at precisely that
i've been drawing my numbers in a clock-like circle for some computations like for Z_5 2+5 i'd start at 2 and add 5 counting around the clock 🙂
a is said to be invertible in a ring A if there is an element b in A such that ab = 1. In that case we call b a's inverse and write b = a^-1
it has +, -, * (and distributivity, so a(b+c) = ab + bc, but that's a detail) and sometimes division
precisely division by invertible numbers
if you can divide by any nonzero element, i.e. every nonzero element is invertible, you call it a field
Z is a ring, but not a field. The smallest field of R is Q, the rational numbers
just perform the operation in Z, then take mod n at the end
3*4 = 12 = 2*5 + 2 = 2 [5]
though note you can take mod n at any and every step if it's more convenient
4^7 = 16 4^5 = 1 4^5 [5] for example
so you notice that 4 = 4^-1
4² = 1 [5]
so 4^7 = (4²)^3 * 4 = 1^3 * 4 = 4 [5]
ohhhhhhhh
which is also what they noticed there
more generally, by Fermat's theorem, a^p = a mod p
more generally, the smallest k such that a^k = 1 [n] is phi(n), the euler totient function
Then a^-1 = a^(phi(n)-1) so a is invertible
so if a isn't coprime with n, there's no power of a (besides 0) that equal 1
but you probably don't need to know that yet
ima be honest my mathematical maturity is so underdveloped
how long have you been in undergrad ? 6 months ?
yea
you're only just starting out
and it's not like these curriculums make you grow more mature much
proof based stuff much more so
i guess it's not obvious to you, because you assumed i had a bunch of background knowledge because maybe it's uncommon to work in fields in linear algebnra without this other background
so it took us a while to get to "when you see 2^-1 in Z_5 you should be thinking 2 multipled by what gives me a remainder of 1 in Z_5?"
I know americans take linalg early
you just made me realize that's a way of finding inverses
though quite a bad one in Fp
it's no faster than this
which is why tacking on some Fp stuff for the sake of it feels a bit off
like i have no idea what this means
Z5 stuff
pure math?
math major, physics minor, likely headed into a more programming/algorithmic career though
very cool! i kinda wanna do physics.
i mean that's what i've taken courses for already so that's already been set in motion
we'll see how that pans out for me heh
and by kinda i mean i really (think) i wanna do physics
but not like you asked.
thank yyou for your help
and determination xD
don't sleep on calculus then
and remember that for a nontrivial solution to exist, the determinant must be zero
calc 2 has been much more enjoyable than calc 1
integrals, differential equations
vector calculus for electromagnetism too
ik ill need it all but calc 1 felt so abstract by comparison
calc 2 feels creative and fun
vector calculus which we got introduced to in physics class lol
linear algebra for quantum stuff ;-;
calc 1 is the simple stuff
and other physics stuff to probably
i never took calc in highschool
thats prob why it felt so boring xD
calc 2 requires a bit of thinking to be fast, but stays easy
just need to have an intuition/experience for what method to use
it's after calculus that things get real
like real analysis
actual linear algebra
i dont think ill need a real analysis course for physics but ive heard many people talk about how difficult it is
isnt it just nitty gritty calculus?
like with proofs n stuff?
oh poor little soul
i have no idea xD
it proves calculus, but damn the last time I took a derivative was a long time ago
it's a lot more interesting
the french undergrad curriculum is real analysis instead of calculus, but it also includes calculus
for first year students
that's why it's so good
and also why the prépas are meant for students who were pretty good at math
it's what I don't like about the american system, it's basically just a spoonfeeding of properties that have to be learned
when in fact they're obvious
the proof is elementary
what you understand you need not learn
that sounds intense wow
12h a week of math lessons, add to that some 12 or 15h of math at home
it's a lot of fun
but it's different
maybe i should just man up and move to france
the first assigment defined the theory of integrals on infinite domains and computed the integral of sin x / x
our 3rd assigment studied a parameterized integral, proved the irrationality of pi and computed zeta of 2 and 4
with 1 assigment a week
for math
- actual exercises (i.e. worksheets)
what book(s) did you use?
was your first year physics course calculus based?
not really no, just defined a bunch of stuff in all fields of physics, sort of foundational stuff, and did basic stuff that only involved high school math
so only derivatives and integrals
that in and of itself is better than the US. every class requiring a $150+ textbook
2nd year is where it got actually mathy, with partial differential equations, vector calculus in electromag, fourier stuff somewhat, etc
one is victim to capitalist consumerism and monopoly, the other one is state funded
they've gotten a bit better. most of our textbooks are online now, thankfully (so far, at least) but what i have bought really just felt like an opportunity for proffs to sell their stuff to students for a few extra bucks
i didnt even use my chem textbook and all of the solutions they had online outside of the textbook for free
🙂
feelsbad
i didnt take chem in highschool either so that was lots of fun
have some fun with this btw if you ever feel like it
@frail igloo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frail igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Short question. Why is it in a big brace now?
why not: 4x^2 + 3x -28x -21
Sometimes without and sometimes with
i dont understand
The size of the braces have no significance as far as i know, the coloring is just to signifiy the correlation, that the expression on top is the same as the expression on the bottom
And the braces exist because the - in front of the braces at the top hasn't been distributed through the expression yet so you need some way to show it applies to the whole thing
Oh okey. Imagine, if there would be a * or /. Does there still have to be a big brace?
At + and - a bracket must be set
But at * and /?
Are you german actually?
Norwegian
You can imagine the -(4x^2+3x-28x-21) being the same as -1*(4x^2+3x-28x-21)
I know I know
The point being yes, if there is - in front of brackets, you will have to take it into account regardless of operator as the - applies to everything inside the brackets
Closed by @snow willow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
lets say a pie of length 1 in half precisely in a hypothetical scenario where flaws and miscalcualtions cannot happen you cant have two pieces of 0.5 each because the middle shared boundary cant be given to both of them and if thats the case then how can 1 = 1/2 + 1/2
What is the question here? The boundary between theoretical math and real world interactions where perfect fractions are hard to do?
"you cant have two pieces of 0.5"?
not precisely
Not sure what you mean
can you theoretically cut something of unit 1 into two precise pieces of 0.5 each?
Yes?
but if thats the case then the middle part (0.500000) should't it be attached to one of the 2 pieces?
you see where i am going with this?
thats a good example
So what's the problem here?
for instance if we where to cut it in half
where would the black line belong?
which of the 2 pieces
It's a hypothetical line
It doesn't exist
Or 1D(doesn't have a height, just length)
even in this case
And if that line has a height you can always divide it by two
Let's just use square since I guess there is no need for a circle
Let's say you splitted this into two pieces
And let's say it has a side length of 1 and so area of 1
What is the problem here
if you want to cut it in half each piece should theoretically be 0.500000....
Yes
Or just 0.5
but if the first piece is 0.5000000....
the second one cannot be exactly 0.50000000... because the former has taken the middle part which is the infinitely precicse 0.500000
There is no middle part
can you see what i mean?
It's an imaginary line
Even if there is a line
You can just divide that line to two pieces
i can both see and not see what you mean
Okay let me visualize it
the fact that i got this question on my own by studying algorithms and time complexity
elaborate if you may
we consider the line to be infinitely thin?
And in most cases those lines are hypothetical
Normally we do
And in mathematics we call them 1 dimensional, heightless
where does the exact half of the line go
If it doesn't have a height 0/2 = 0
so its basically a concept
Yes it's just imaginary
You can draw these imaginary lines everywhere
So does that mean nothing can be splitted? No.
It's one of those questions when you randomly get a weird idea and think that it's true
I've been there
Like randomly thinking, how do we even know if 2 + 2 is 4
yeah its a bit of a (math) existential crisis
Yeah we can call it that :p
anyway thanks for your interest lets hope it sinks in as an idea in my head
.close
Closed by @alpine reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is more of a question for your teacher because there is no general convention for how to make results like these look "nice"
personal preference plays a role here too
I dont wanna so it
Because then
It will become
- (3-2root3)
i would advise to distribute the -1 because it would be the same as flipping the order of subtraction
the only thing that you should do is just put the negative sign in numerator
thats a convention but people follow it only in earlier classes
explicitly writing the 1*(3-2root5 somehow makes it worse)
yea that should be it
So
so do whatever you want
its the same thing either way
if you teacher wants you to do it this specific way so do it like this
Wha
ok dont do that definitely
2√5-3/11
Iforgot to put the -
you just removed the negative sign altogether
Multiply numerator and denominator by -1
do this in the numerator
Nope you need parentheses
Like -(3-2√5)/11
Yea
instead of just a floating negative remember it is actually -1 so when you multiply that by (3-2root5) it becomes -1*3 -1 times -2root5
so it becomes -3 + 2root5
exactly
just write 2root 5 before -3 if you want
just makes it look neater
So dats the final answer
Yup
yes
and in third step you need not put the parenthesis
the parenthesis is used to convey that that negative sign is being multiplied to the whole numerator and not only to the first number to the left in the numerator
Coz of the fact -(a/b) = -a/b = a/-b ?
Yup
Thanks guys
.close
Closed by @cyan saffron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not sure what that means
solve it for x?
There is a fraction (1/ 7-2root10 )that is getting divided by 3
How do I divide a fraction by a number
Thats what im asking for
dividing by a fraction is equivalent to multiplying by the reciprocal
Can u draw it
$\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} = a\cdot\frac{c}{b}$
a disappointing son
ok, im not good with this but i'll explain some of it
they switch x into 1/x, which causes the signs to flip (second part)
so you can see '-' on the bottom, '+' on the top on the second preview
hm
Hm


weird grapes
Cool doe




lmao





::RogerThat:Roge
:Perfect:


girls
They didn't simplify just because there isn't a need for it
And what the exercise wants you to find is x+1/x, knowing what x is
Nothing ?
There's nothing wrong with simplifying x. It's just that x+1/x will be an addition of fractions
In order to add fractions into a single one, what do we do ?
Imagine you have to calculate $$\frac{3}{5} + \frac{4}{7}$$
Epsilia aka Mellow
Ik make denos same
Exactly
So in order to calculate x+1/x
Since they both are fractions
The smort thing would be to try to see how you would make denos same
Once you add them
ok why do you need to simplify it?
And when you have these square roots, you already know it will be about multiplying by the conjugate of the denominator
Luckily enough, the denominator of 1/x is exactly the conjugate of the denominator of x
So this makes things a lot simpler
You just have to multiply each fraction by the conjugate of the denominator of the other fraction
Which is exactly what your prof did
Yup ?
U ARE SO RIGHT DAM
but
Like ive been simplidying in the whole exercise right so in mah head im like I gotta simplify it too ya know and so I think ill simplify it but wat I learned from dis is tat u dont always have to simplify it and also the reason why i didnt go with the prof its coz, to add fracs u shud make denos same and here dey just combines both fracs and their denos arent even same so my brain cant accept that
Yeah you don't always have to ! Exactly that's a good thing to memorize. There is a reason why we simplify, and it's not always that same reason we have as an objective in a problem.
I guess what feels a bit problematic to you, which I totally understand, is about how you are not having this agility with fractions yet. It will come soon enough after observing the mechanism behind it every time 👍
If you don't get why something is being calculated a certain way, try your best at understanding why things are the way they are
It's imo the best way to get your mind more flexible with these
If we've finished, you can close the channel with ".close"
@restive river
No like
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the primitive of 1/(1+e^x)
Let u = e^x, then du/dx = e^x and dx = du / u
substitute these values
into the integral
∫ 1 / (1 + e^x) dx
= ∫ 1 / (1 + u) * du / u (substitute u = e^x, and dx = du / u)
= ∫ (1/u) / (1 + u) du
(1/u) / (1 + u) = A/(1+u) + B/u
Multiplying both sides by the denominator (1+u)u
1 = A u + B (1+u)
we have
Setting u = 0, we get B = 1. Setting u = -1, we get A = -1/2.
(1/u) / (1 + u) = -1/2 * 1/(1+u) + 1/u
no subastitue back to intgral
∫ 1 / (1 + e^x) dx
= ∫ (1/u) / (1 + u) du
= ∫ (-1/2) * 1/(1+u) du + ∫ 1/u du
= -1/2 * ln|1+u| + ln|u| + C
= -1/2 * ln|1+e^x| + ln|e^x| + C
the primitive of the function f(x) = 1 / (1 + e^x) is:
F(x) = -1/2 * ln|1+e^x| + x + C, where C is the constant of integration.
Can’t be that complicated to find a primitive
i dont know much 😅
Closed by @vague stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Exercice 1
Exercice 1
multiply both sides by 7
The thing is I don't even understand the question compare what?
How am I supposed to compare two unknown numbers ???
probably a linear equation in 2 variables
The value of a and b is unknown
or draw graph!?
if you take a=something you can find b with that respect
Probably wants you to say which one is bigger
Hold on
This is the original exercise
As you can see in the first case we have a = 8/15 and b =9/20
Pretty clear but in the following cases It just doesn't make sense to me
You need to say whether a is bigger or b is bigger just using the equation a-b = -4/7
Mhm and do you have any idea on how I can proceed to prove which one is bigger
@inner void Has your question been resolved?
@inner void Has your question been resolved?
Ummm does someone know what to do?
you have a - b = -4/7? and it is asking which of a or b is bigger?
@inner void Has your question been resolved?
if you subtract one number from another, and the answer is negative, do you have an intuition for which is bigger?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wait can someone tell me,why this has no extreme point?
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
it's only defined on an open interval (-3,3)
it has no point where derivative is 0
it's differentiable everywhere
so, no extreme value
ik but i mean if i would try to find an extreme point would i get an answer?
how did you get -6
setting derivative = 0
this is the whole function it goes off to infinity
,w calc 1 / (3 + -6) + 1 / (3 - -6)
i multiplite with 3-x and then i multiplite with 3+x
I think you forgot to change signs then
anyway this is the real problem
but i dont know if it is allowed to do that
what do you mean?
zfnQRZJT
right so where does -6 come from?
probably arithmetic error
.
true
but if i have this
and i would multiply it with 3-x
what would i get
$1 + \frac{3-x}{3 + x} = 0, x \neq 3$
zfnQRZJT
zfnQRZJT
and the derivative was $\frac{1}{3+x} + \frac{1}{3-x} + 1 = 0$
zfnQRZJT
zfnQRZJT
but again, the function is not defined there
ok
if i have this do i have to multiply with 3+x
zfnQRZJT
no solution
...no
i see what you mean
but i have to calculate x-x first
before i do something else?
you have to compute the entire left side
it doesn't matter which you combine first
so first i should right 6=0 which cant go
and then i can do other steps if necessary
i know but if there were some avaible i mean
But i did understand it i thank both of you+
@little helm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do you what tv size means
@sinful mist Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sinful mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone know how to get number 4
Differentiate it
y = 5x^4
but it wants whats perpindicular
Slope of tangent = 5×16 = 80
m1×m2=-1
m2=-1/80
Slope of perpendicular = -1/80
Point passes through (-2,-32)
Y+32=-1/80 ( x+2)
@halcyon parrot Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
m1×m2=-1
how did you get to that sorry
Product of slope of two perpendicular lines =-1
tan90= |m2-m1/1+m1m2|
m1m2+1=0
m1m2=-1
ok and where did our -2,-32 come from
Tangent touches at x=-2 i.e. when y=-32
i understand that but i dont get how you put that together if that makes ense
@halcyon parrot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I walk through this problem with someone, genuinely have no idea where to start
At least for part a
Where in question a did you get stuck?
Sorry I should’ve clarified
Part a
Oops I misread
Like I don’t know where to begin to find a basis
Given U
Can I begin by substituting the restraints of x1 and x3?
Sure
Okay
Also the question was updated, here is the most recent version
There is no + 3
I apologize for the confusion
Hmmm yeah that +3 had me do some serious mental gymnastics
Yeah I didn’t realize the image I had was outdated I’m so sorry
Anyways, lemme right out the constrains, I’ll send an image right now
@gloomy valve Did you just die?
what math are u taking?
Yep that works
Sick okay
And from here
Do I begin the proof to show that it is a basis ?
Given U is what I have above
Sure
To show that this is a basis, I need to show that span U is equal to R^5 and it is linearly independent. To show that span U equals R^5, will I need to show all of R^5 is in U and vise versa ? (Subset both ways implies equality)
Do I have the right idea or should I rethink what I’m doing 😭
I am gonna be honest I am sorta new to this subject myself and your words blew right past me
I need to show all of R^5 is in U
But... Not all of R^5 is in U though
To show this forms a basis in U, you just need to show:
- that all the vectors generated by your basis are in U
- that all the vectors in U can be generated by your basis
I think I get what you were trying to do, it was almost right

Why? Did I say something stupid?
Snow if you're available I'll let you take over
i am not
sad
How would I prove that our basis of U spans r^5?
You need to show your basis spans U
Forget about R^5
Plus I'm pretty sure U does not span R^5
No, all of U is in R^5, but not all of R^5 is in U
Fuck yeah ur right
U is a subset of R^5
What I sent above, with the 3 vectors, would that a good start to begin the proof
Yes right because we need 3 vectors to form a basis of U
Okay I will do that right now, for the sake of the channel, should I close it and ping you when I am ready ?
So you can check my proof
If you don’t mind ofc
No need to close this channel
Ok
i haven’t made much progress, here is where im stuck
Because like I don’t know what to start with my proof statement
Like are the 3 addition thingys individual vectors ?
@gloomy valve Has your question been resolved?
@gloomy valve Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
I think you need to apply law of cosines
apply sine rule on A and B and then square both the sides
Try to simplify from there onwards
Three variable whole square?
2sinbcosb
you will end up getting value in cos B since sin B gets removed
then apply cosine rule on angle B
simpify and you will get your answer
yep
Sinb should cancel
yep
Any hint
Equating to zero
yes
Not possible answer
How to factorise them
What if b²-c²=(b-c)(b+c)
@restive river
<@&286206848099549185>
move the b(b2 - c2) to rhs so it becomes a2 (c-b) = b(c2-b2)
then apply difference of square identity so (c-b) cancels from both sides
then youre left with a2 = b(b+c)
so option A
Closed by @tardy vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
induction?
^
Induction+ combustion
you can even check easily which answer is correct by setting k to some low value
like k = 1
For k=1 , 1+(n+1)!/n!
= n + 2
the answer is C
Explain
you can check it easily with $\binom{n}{m} = \binom{n - 1}{m} + \binom{n - 1}{m - 1}$.
Z_char
and the reason i guess C is the answer is based on combination.
$\binom{n + t}{t}$ is like using t marks to split n objects.
Z_char
you know what i mean? what you choose is the place you put boards on. other places are objects. and the objects between two boards are in the same group.
notice $\binom{n + k + 1}{n + 1} = \binom{n + k + 1}{k}$.
Z_char
Board? Object?
oh sorry the answer should be C.
nosols and if you had to give a solution make sure it's the right one 
/lighthearted
use this to check it.
$$\begin{align}
\binom{n+k+1}{k} &= \binom{n+k}{k} + \binom{n + k}{k - 1} \
&= \binom{n+k}{k} + \binom{n + k - 1}{k - 1} + \binom{n + k - 1}{k - 2}
\end{align}$$
Z_char
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
notice you have (n+k)(k), (n+k-1)(k-1), if you continue to do that, you will have (n+t)(t)...
im sorry, the answer is C.
I didn't get the procedure
ok, so do you understand how to prove the answer?
i mean, if you know the answer, use the procedure above to prove it?
I'm just confused
can you understand this?
Did you choose option to prove question
okay, you'd better to do this procedure on paper by yourself. that's the proof.
Do i need to solve option 3
yes.
and i can tell you how i think to get the answer.
$\binom{n+k+1}{k}$ is you have $n+k+1$ things, how many ways you have to choose $k$ things.
Z_char
Ok
but you have another way to consider this, to assume you have $n + 1$ apples, and you need to put them on $k$ boxes, boxes are different and apples are the same. how many ways do you have?
Z_char
my bad, you have k+1 boxes.
One box can contain how much apples
k+1 different boxes and n+1 apples.
infinite apples.
the answer is also $\binom{n + k + 1}{k}$.
Z_char
assume you have $n+k+1$ blanks at first, then you put on $k$ boards on $k$ blanks to divide the apples from different groups.
Z_char
Ok
Ok
okay, then $\binom{n+k+1}{k}$ means n+1 apples in k+1 boxes.
Z_char
because 5 choose 1(above picture) is four apples(1 + 3) in two boxes.
Why 3+1 why not directly 4
because in the picture i showed is one in the first and three in the second.
im afraid that you do not understand, so i use 1+3 to relate to the picture.
Let me tell
1 apple in first box
3 apple in second box
Two box contains 3+1=4 apple
that's ture.
so we have this.
One thing that why second box put three apples instead 2
emm, you can put two.
if you choose the third blank in this picture!
so how many ways you choose blank = how many ways you put apples.
For k Box (k+1) apple?
im afraid i do not understand.
okay, $\binom{n + b}{b}$ means put n apples in b+1 boxes.
Z_char
like the example in the picture, you have five blanks. you have to choose one. it's $\binom{5}{1}$.
Z_char
but anyway you choose one. you can consider this as a way to put four apples in 2 boxes.
im afraid i have to sleep. however, i can quickly go through the rest things and you can wait others for help.
you have the meaning about the answer now.
then consider the meaning about the question.
it's just another way to count the ways. you consider the first apple is on which box. on first box we have n apples on k boxes. on second box we have n apples on k-1 boxes. and we plus them together. that's the formula in the problem.
Can you consider me any video solution from yt
and they present the same meaning - the ways to put n+1 apples on k+1 boxes.
that is, distinct boxes but with nondistinct apples
im sorry i can't... i don't use it very often and then i don't know too much about that.
Ok
@tardy vapor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you reason deductively to explain how the number of cubes are produced?
you have 5 layers of cubes each laid out in a 5 by 5 grid.
Pro_Hecker
5^3 is deductive reasoning also?
so this is the reasoning that leads to 5^3? or this means the same as 5^3? 🙂
a cube has 8 corners
a cube has 12 edges
a cube has 6 faces
the cube is cut up into smaller cubes
the smaller cubes are the same size
in one corner there is 1 cube
in one edge there are 5 cubes
in one face there are 5 x 5 cubes
this cube has 1 cube for each corner
3 more cubes for each edge
9 more cubes for each face
there is a smaller cube inside it that
has 1 cube for every corner
1 cube for every edge
1 cube for every face
there is one cube inside this smaller cube
@fierce matrix Has your question been resolved?
what are different ways to reason this?
Deductive Reasoning Example: All dogs have ears; golden retrievers are dogs, therefore they have ears.
you could reason that there we 8 corner cubes, 3 cubes in each of 12 edges (excl. the corner cubes you've counted), 9 cubes in the middle of each of 6 faces, and 27 cubes in the interior.
you will get the same number.
thank you @pseudo basin and @tall stirrup
this is the rest of this task if you are interested:
@fierce matrix Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Result:
35
@torpid roost Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@runic pollen Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @runic pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
#help channels are for homework type questions/problems
That is a question
that meme is not wrong
you that smite player
@reef fox Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status'
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
I tried using the cos inv x + cos inv y formula
And then it just got messy
Maybe i can try converting this into tan?
pretty sure the first 2 terms resolve to pi/2
How?
try creating a right angled triangle
with the non hypotenuse sides as sqrt(p) and sqrt(1-p)
@untold nova Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello I'm trying to do these 3 integrals but i all of them are wrong, in the first one the solution from the book is 1/3sqrt(2x+1)(2x+1) i don't know how he got that
The 2nd one the solution from the book is Ln(sqrtx-1)^2 here i don't know why he didn't put the ^2 on the square root
For the 3rd one i don't really get the solution because it says 2/3sqrt(x+2)(x+5)
@slender wigeon Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Yes
Closed by @slender wigeon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the statement true that there are 12 odd three-digit numbers where the hundreds digit is twice as large as the tens digit?
No, the statement is not true that there are 12 odd three-digit numbers where the hundreds digit is twice as large as the tens digit. In fact, there are no odd three-digit numbers that meet this criteria.
To see why, let's suppose that there is such a number with hundreds digit h and tens digit t. Since the number is odd, its units digit must be 1, 3, 5, 7 or 9. However, since the hundreds digit is twice the tens digit, we have h = 2t.
Now, we can express the number as 100h + 10t + 1. Substituting h = 2t, we get 100(2t) + 10t + 1 = 201t + 1. Since we want the number to be odd, we need 201t to be even, which means that t must be even as well. But then the tens digit can only be 0, 2, 4, 6 or 8, none of which satisfy the condition that the hundreds digit is twice as large as the tens digit. Therefore, there are no odd three-digit numbers that satisfy the criteria.
please refrain from using ai to answer questions
k
@gray phoenix Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$e^{-x}=1$
putridplanet
nearest hundredth
take ln of both sides
$lne^{-x}=ln1$
putridplanet
$lne^{-x}=0$
putridplanet
yep
and ln(e^(-x)) is by definition -x
or you can apply some log rules to get -x*ln(e)
which is just -x*1
how
ln is inverse of e^x
$ln(e^{-x}) = -xln(e) = -x(1) = -x$
meaning ln(e^x)=x and e^ln(x)=x
MellowDramaLlama
how is ln(e) =1
ln(15) would mean: to what power do I have to raise e to get 15?
ln(e) means: to what power do I have to raise e to get e?
Which is obviously 1
e is just a number
2.718281828 or sth
I dont remember it
and I cant. Since it has infinitely many nonrepeating digits
why 15 ?
just arbitary example to demonstrate what ln means
oh i get it
so raising the power of something to one is like saying
raising something to the power of 1 would be the correct terminology
the same thing as one times the number
if you have time this video does a good job explaining what e is, its origins, and why it's important
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDFcu_wLOzo&ab_channel=TheOrganicChemistryTutor
This math video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the number e, it's relation to logarithms, and how e - also known as euler's number - is calculated.
My Website: https://www.video-tutor.net
Patreon Donations: https://www.patreon.com/MathScienceTutor
Amazon Store: https://www.amazon.com/shop/theorganicchemistrytutor
Subscribe:
htt...
e is actually not so important in high school. The problem is that people rather derive definition of log from it's properties than properties from the definition
and have no idea what ln actually means
oh that's true
@digital jacinth Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is this formula?
expected value? for a continuous random variable
we need consent
the definition of the expected value of X, a continuous v.r. whose density function is $f$, and usually $f$ is lowercased, but that's not a rule ofc
shell.exe
ty
ty
youre welcome
if we changed it to E(x^2) it would still be expected value?
X^2 is also a random variable, so yes
ok ty
@slow magnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tulip steppe
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So is this channel available?
