#help-27
1 messages · Page 75 of 1
yea alr
got that far
then using cosine, we can find the angle👍
(tbh, i didnt do the math, so i don't know the final answer :P)
DV = CV = BV = AV = y
VH = sqrt(y^2*-a^2)
VOH = 90 degrees
but thats as far as I get
lets see
then why I applied the cos rule as you suggested, I get a/(sqrt(y^2-a^2)
Note: ALL edges
including DV,CV,BV,AV
get it? XD
no
I'm a very slow person 
one of my only super reactions
🙂
thanks a lot man
byeee
.close
Closed by @wicked fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this proof by induction fallacious?
T(n) = T(n-1) + n. Prove that T(n) = O(n^2)```
Closed by @low fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if we have a group, call it G that is not necessarily finite, and we have that H is a subgroup of G and |G:H|=m, can we conclude that G is finite since |G:H| would be infinite if G was infinte?
from the definition, |G:H|, which is the number of (left) cosets of H in G. this doesnt make intuitive sense to me as H is finite
H is finite?
hhhhhmmmmm
not stated, so not necessarily
So the whole question is.
Let G be an abelian group(possibly infinite) with subgroups H and K such that H is a subgroup of K. Suppose |G:K|=n and |G:H|=m where n|m. Find |K:H|.
all i need to finish the proof is to prove that G is finite
if it is finite, then I can use Lagranges theorem and be done
Note: I used the third isomorphic theorem, simply stating for clarity
@loud light Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Think of Z
That's not a proof question
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
calc help
I found h''(x) = f''(g(x)) * (g'(x))^2 + f'(g(x)) * g''(x).
Since f is concave down, that means f''(x) < 0. So does that mean that f''(g(x)) is < 0?
<@&286206848099549185>
Yes it does
hmm
also
it says f is increasing
So we know that f''(g(x)) is < 0 and (g'(x))^2 > 0 so the product of that is negative. Also, f'(g(x)) > 0 and g''(x) < 0 so the product of that is also negative. Since the sum is negative we have shown h''(x) < 0 and thus concave down.
My only concern is that is f'(g(x)) > 0 or >= 0?
It also says the first derivative is nonzero
I see your concern. I don’t think there are any functions meeting the criteria where that actually happens, but really you don’t need to check
Because for this part of h''(x): f'(g(x)) * g''(x) would I then say that the product is always < 0
Break it down into two cases, f’(g(x)) = 0 and f’(g(x)) > 0
because if f''(x) >= 0 then this product would be 0
Right, the first term is less than 0 and the second term is at most 0, so the sum is less than 0
Yes but
lol
this question is so dumb
u get what my problem is tho right?
I don't want to say that f'(g(x)) * g''(x) is < 0
cuz f'(g(x)) could be 0
which would make the product 0
Right. But that’s not the only part of h(x). I gtg hope you figure it out
I meant h’’(x)
<@&286206848099549185> can anyone help?
No it can't
The problem states that f' is never zero
Do not consider f'=0
Perfect answer right here
@half cape Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @half cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
calc
,w points of inflection x\left(\ln\left(x^{2}\right)\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}
,w intervals increasing x\left(\ln\left(x^{2}\right)\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}
,w what is y when x = 0.9 x\left(\ln\left(x^{2}\right)\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}
,w intervals decreasing x\left(\ln\left(x^{2}\right)\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}
@half cape are you trying to find an example function?
No I have this function:
Don't know where is it decreasing
Can't seem to find that out
and did you calculate f'' at those points yet?
e^(-2/3)
that isn't need to check increasing or decreasing
only first derivative is
Oh duh I did it backwards
You are right
No wait..
f'=0 will give you critical points, local max or min
Intervals between critical points will be either increasing or decreasing
use f''>0 or f''<0 to determine increasing or decreasing between critical points
it has decreasing points
hmm so is wolfram trolling?
which decreasing intervals did u get?
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
sorry
I got between -1 and 1 not inclusive
best advice I can offer is ^(2/3) is being interpreted as a complex root
do cbrt(^2) to keep it as a real root
This is a tricky problem
Lots of parts
@half cape Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @half cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for this series
im suppose to use
limit comparison
but
idk what
b_n is suppiose to be
apparently the answer key says b_n = 1/n^(3/2)
you're asked to show whether this series is divergent or convergent, right?
or are you to compute the actual values?
yes
and i am to use limit comparison test here
but like
I dont even know how to get started because
I dont know what $b_n$ is here
Calc II Victim
and I dont know how they got this either
try comparing it to 1/n^2 lol
but why 1/n^2
if that doesnt work tune the p in n^p
what do u mean by tuning?
Like mess with it
ngl doe Idk how I would get to 1/n^(3/2) from there doe
If you calculate a few terms you see it would converge
So you just find a few terms of like
1/n^2 and friends
Yeah if 1/n^2 doesnt work I'll go to 1/n^(3/2) as my next try
Or 1/n^(5/2)
OHHH
wait so like
lets say I were to start with
1/n^5 right
not for this series
but like sum other series
and that didnt work
then I would try
1/n^4.5 and 1/n^5.5
as my next b_n right
Usually I start with 1/n^2 because its the first thing I know that converges
1/n doesnt
mfw basel problem
what that mean
I get u now
tysm
np
just the name of the sum 1/n^2, which was proven by euler to converge to pi^2/6
No
You get used to it
Kmm if you're not going to contribute to the help don't randomly talk
Yeah of course
Calculate a few terms and find some other series to look at
wont the limit always reach infinite still
no matter what I compare it with
What
(a_n * 1/b_n)
What is a_n
.
I have to go now sorry
But you actually have the tools you need to figure it out yourself
Closed by @scenic surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this question?
since they gave you 2 roots, you can directly let b and c be equal to them
that'll make the equations easier to solve
yes! i have done that
let me show u
i dont understand how to get the dialation though
hmm is there missing info? like the question says it passes through point A and (10, -15/4)
whats point A
cuz you need 2 equations to solve for a and b
yup
all the best!
@median stratus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have a function f such as f : Rn[x] -> Rn[x]
f is invective
Since dim Rn[x] < +infinite
So f bijective
I have some doubt about that and if it's really true, then why?
i don't get it
Try to prove it
then (e1, ... e(n+1)) a basis of Rn[x]
f(e1) have the same degree of e1 because it's Rn[x] -> Rn[x]
so (f(e1), ... f(e(n+1)) a basis
what's the degree of a vector ?
degree of what?
f(e1) has the same degree as e1
yes
that means you've defined what the degree of a vector is
I'm asking you what that is
e1 € Rn[x]
so the same meaning as a polynomial
so X^k -> X^(k+1) if k != n and 1 if k = n
is injective
does it preserve the degree ?
hum
also let's try and make a proof that holds for any vector spaces, not just Rn[X] -> Rn[X]
ok
then f :E -> E
with dim E < +infinite
we have to show that if f injective then f bijective
ok
f injective so f(e1) is not a linear combination of any f(e(i))
so (f(e1), ... f(e(n)) a basis?
why ?
well that's no true
f injective so f(e1) is not equal of any f(e(i))
but that's not sufficient
i have to show that it's not a linear combination of any other f(e(i))
don't know how to do that
don't have idea
that works as well actually
have any advice? x)
what's easier to use
as a characterization of injectivity
f(x) = f(y) => x = y
x != y => f(x) != f(y)
that what i saw
one of the strengths of the proof by contradiction is that it gives you a starting point if you otherwise have none
if n = dim E
then there's n f(e(i)) so it's a basis since the cardinal is equal to the dimension
hum
which is really just a rephrasing of this
which you may have seen as saying that a linear combination of them can't be 0 unless it's actually an empty sum
which amounts to saying one can't be a LC of the others
it's remind me nothing
suppose it is
ok
cause even though you didn't mention it, surely it was implied
did you do that
@maiden zinc Has your question been resolved?
i don't see what kind of equality
what does it mean for f(e1) to a linear combination of the f(ei) ?
of the e1?
of the f(ei), i.e. (f(e2), ..., f(en+1))
the contradiction is to say it's a combination of the others
need to point that out somehow
so wlog f(e1) is a CL of the others that way it's just [2, n+1]
without loss of generality
suppose f(e1) is a CL of the others
ye
the others are the f(ei), i in [2, n+1]
which is more convenient than [1, n+1] \ {i} for a fixed i
i don't get why inside a set with max n+1 honestly
but it's not the main point
so here you showed what?
you wanna show that it's a free family right
yes
by contradiction
to have a starting point
since you otherwise couldn't find one
ok but don't see where's the contradiction
mateo713
that's what we assume to reason by contradiction
ok and how can i find a contradiction, we just have the information that f is linear and injective
use linearity
$f(e1) = \sum b_k e_k = \sum a_k f(e_k)$
_ don't get copy pasted because they are special characters
that in physics, we would call not homogeneous
i.e. the units are wrong
because the ek and f(ek) don't exist in the same space
not true since e(i) is a basis
the ak don't suddenly become bk that aren't defined
$f(e1) = f(\sum a_k e_k )= \sum a_k f(e_k)$
to get this
then we use the other fact we know
that f is injective so e1 != sum of ak*ek
so contradiction
the family is free
so the familie is free and the cardinal is equal to the dimension so it's a basis
so i have to show that
you just did
you contradicted f's injectivity by assuming it wasn't a basis
note: you actually showed something a bit more general:
linear injective functions preserve linear independence
what can you say of n independent vectors in an n-dimensional vector space
they're a basis
but now I gotta go
hopefully you'll be able to convince yourself without me
ye thx a lot
@maiden zinc Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @maiden zinc
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i go about looking for sum of this series
that's the sum of the (n choose k) for k ranging from 0 to n
which is known to be 2^n by the expansion of (1+1)^n using the binomial theorem
Feel free to look up any term you've never heard before
(n choose k) being a binomial coefficient (to look it up more easily)
@orchid glade Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @orchid glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain how to approach this
@scenic surge Has your question been resolved?
probably should try using some test on it
Or could it be possible by comparison to the geometric series (7x)^n?
@scenic surge Has your question been resolved?
what test would be appropriate
Closed by @scenic surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have E a subspace at finished dimension, let's call n = dim E
and u a linear function of E -> E
i have ker u^k include in ker u^(k+1)
(u^k = it's the combination meaning. ie u^3 = u(u(u(x)))
i have to show that it exists a p€N such as ker u^p = ker u^(p+1)
i think that what make this expression true is that the dimension of E is finished
since ker u^k is growing the dimension of ker u^(k+1) is at least +1 grower
so it'll arrive a time when dim ker u^k will be equal to dim E and so the next one will be 0 because it can't be bigger than E
is my reasoning true?
@maiden zinc Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Yes
Exercise: prove/disprove the property for infinite dimension
Hint/answer: ||it's false||
infinite dimensions don't exist
infinity is fake news
all numbers are less than 2^128
why 2^128
i don't get it, it works for finite dimension right?
yes
ok i just don't know how to prove ^
That's the idea, it just needs some fleshing out
@maiden zinc Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @maiden zinc
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
factor numerator
is the factor 2x^2-x+3
yeah
,w expand (x-2)(2x^2-x+3)
so if i factor it it will turn into (x-2) (2x^2-x+3)??
yeah
then i substitute the limit
then cancel out x-2
,w lim as x-> 2 of (2x^3-5x^2+5x-6)/(x-2)
yeah ur correct
Closed by @kindred sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Somebody tell me how OK= csc in the picture
@little onyx Has your question been resolved?
csc=1/sin
HO=1
OA=1
OG=sin (by definition)
triangle OGA similar to tirangle OHK
Thus, OK/OH=OA/OG
@little onyx
Closed by @little onyx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, the value I got for c was an imaginary number.
So, I'm not sure why that conclusion is wrong
It has to do with the definition of MVT
is an imaginary number a value we can use for c?
Think of continuity
okay
the right conclusion would be that mvt is inapplicable
since your function isn't even defined at x=3, and if it was, it would be guaranteed discontinuous there
The C is irrelevant given that your function doesn’t meet the first requirement of MVT.
because it's not continuous on that interval?
Yes
gotcha
cause it is differentiable
but it fails the first one
yeah okay okay
alrighty
ty everyone
.close
Closed by @sage socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's the general procedure to solving functional equations? For example, f(0.8) = 7/3, f(2) = 13/3. How would I solve this one?
depends if you're given more information
That's not quite a functional equation I think.
That's more like "how do I extrapolate that"
Nope
Well i have to find f(x), so i think it's a functional equation
It's so far from unique
There's no simpler description of the set of functions that satisfy those equations
f(x) = 7/3 if x=0.8, 13/3 if x=2, 42069 otherwise
You've got an infinity of polynomials, of trig functions, etc
@finite briar are you 110% certain that you are given zero further information
Yeah..well i am given 2 or 3 more values for f(x) but that's about it
"about"?
okay, no, this won't do.
show us the problem exactly as it was stated.
screenshot or picture.
or tell us you are unable to do this.
The entire question is an integral question, have to find the area under a graph
But the function or its derivative haven't been stated
Wait a sec
show everything under the question number regardless of whether you think its relevant
@finite briar Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> sorry i went afk 😞
i cant see a task where you should determine a function. you should shade an area and select a part of the graph which represents something
no one asked you to do something like this.
Find how far the travels in the first 4 seconds..
Isn't that the integral from 0 to 4 of this graph?
Yeah, but that doesnt help find distance, does it?
it is the integral, yes. but you are not asked zto calculate it. you are asked to shade the area which represents this.
Oh...oops ig
in the future be mindful of the xy problem
But okay, say they asked me to calculate it, how would I do so?
Okay ma'am 🫡
you cant - without further information. What you could do is to estimate the integral by counting the shaded squares - for example.
Ah..is there no way to derive the function using the graph?
no
Sad 😦
not exactly. you could assume it looks like a log (or something else) and fit the log, but this is alos an estimation.
Okay.. Tysm Ann and ThM
.close
Closed by @finite briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey! a^2 + 8a + 12, solve by splitting middle term
Kindly help
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
Does that say “solve” ??
I'm on 2
Okay, show what you’ve done so far. But wdym “solve”
It’s not an equation
Do you mean factorise
Alright can you Show your work?
Shady
$-3x -2 = -5, +6$
Shady
6, why?
Oh lmao
Why are you using ‘y’
uhh
Should that not be 6a and 2a
Okay so $a^2 + 6a + 2a + 12$
Deol
but like
I can't take common in everything
which is how we are told to factorize
Wdym?
And what about 2a and 12?
i get it now
So what do you get as answer?
(a+2) (a+6)
Yess
gg thx but
Nice work
Yes?
Lol nice
Show me what you mean
Shady
You can do that
Shady
really
but here
its manipulating -2
why?
soo
The answer to a^2 -5a +6
is?
factoring -2 out of -2a - 6 gets you -2(a+3) and not -2(a-3)
They changed the question mid way
they're both factorable, in slightly different ways
I see
Eh lets get to the last question here
y^2 +18y +17
I see I can't like split the middle term here
Can
ℝamonov
yes
@spice saffron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Indices
Need help with B part
@safe turret Has your question been resolved?
im gonna fail math
@safe turret Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @safe turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok so i got to here
should the bottom 2 look different?
after i found that my function is = to 0 at x=6
i plug in numbers on either side of 6 into my original function to figure out if its a maximum or minimum
<@&286206848099549185> invite me your private chat
i dont understand why im being targeted
@frosty cradle is a good man, maybe he can help
i
and that gave me my picture up top with the black boxes
im not sure if i set it up correctly
your picture isn't very clear, the writing is pretty light
well what's the original problem?
what is the green box?
the derivative
they wrote it differently but the graybox is my answer which is also correct
ok then N=6 seems right. is it actually wrong?
nope n = 6 is correct
so i plug in a 7 and 5 into original function to determine if its max or min
and that game me my 2 things in my picture here
at the bottom
im curious if its done wrong or if i just dont know how to interpret it
to know if it goes from negative to pos or vice versa
the "proper" thing to do is calculate the second derivative and see whether it is positive or negative
but you have to square the whole denominator, anyway
hmm that would be a very big quotient rule setup i think?
oh ur right
ok so i got k5/3,721 and k7/7,225
now what does this mean for my min and max?
is the way im doing it valid as well? i did remember to include that ^2 on the outside the ( )
they are both positive
what does it mean if they are both positive?
afk?
@light quail Has your question been resolved?
sry
thats ok
both positive? then perhaps N=6 is an inflection point
so you'd need to verify with the 2nd derivative
what do i do next if i assume its an inflection point?
,w plot (2N) / (36 + N^2)
im not sure how you were able to plot that
hmmm
,w plot (36 - N^2) / (36 + N^2)^2
according to this, at N=7 the derivative is negative, not positive
(for k=1)
,w plot (72 - 2*N^2) / (36 + N^2)^2
ok, I see where you went wrong. You have to evaluate $f'(5)$ and $f'(7)$, whereas it looks like you evaluated the original functions
cwatson
oh
$f'(N) = \frac{k(36 - N^2)}{(36 + N^2)^2}$
cwatson
can i also just plug in 5 and 7 into
into what?
the derivative of the original function
yes, that's what I'm saying
ok so i got f'(5) = 11k/3,721 and f'(7) = -13k/7,225
so its positive when its approaching 0
and the negative after
which means its a maximum
yes
is it not just n=6?
I don't know, seems confusing
Closed by @light quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was given
and asked to prove
I proved that it is correct
but now I'm asked to prove given what I found previously that
and I've been trying for like an hour but I can't seem to grasp where to even begin
the problem is the goal is they want me to get to exactly the same inequality
and I'm not sure how cause for all I know they chose random number to fill in and I will be lucky to find them
i'm a bit confused as to what you mean
What I'm expected to do is prove this inequality for those specific numbers
and not just say that it's true cause 0.1 is less than 1/6
or wait
that actually makes no sense when I think about it
Okay I think I got it hate my language
thanks.
.close
Closed by @magic dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
@graceful jackal
Ya
.
1
Do you know the formula for area of trapezoid?
umm no
Idk than
$$ A = \frac{a+b}{2}h $$
where a and b are the sides of the trapezoid and h is the height
So I plug the numbers in Using that formula?
exactly
Ye
Subtract the area of rectangle in between
Need help with this one
Idk what that is
Where n is number of sides
So N is 5
No
Then how can n be 5
Sorry it’s 12
Ok correct
Now do the formula
And divide it by number of angles
Which is 12 too
1800/12
Tag me when you reply
@pearl moon 150
Ok 150/2is the angle between radius and segment
Ami right?
Do you know trigonometry reply with tag
@pearl moon yes Ik trig but not expert at it
@graceful jackal Has your question been resolved?
@graceful jackal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can a differentiable function exist with no local minima between two local maxima
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In how many ways can you fill 36 tiles with 2 white pieces , 3 black pieces and an infinite number of purple pieces ?
I don't know how to aproach this one. My first guess would have been 12* 36! but apparently that isn't among the answers by a long shot
hmm
does order matter?
like is white then purple different from purple then white?
you choose where white pieces are, and choose where purple pieces are, accounting for some empty space filled by white
so not e, not f
A refers to non repeating permutations in this textbook, and C to non repeating combinations
no clue lol
it's maybe A
nope
ok i'll calculate all of them just in case
oh right it's a
10 is 5C2
oooooooooooh
you choose 5 non purple spots, and then choose 2 white
Closed by @pine plinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
what
So, I'm still struggling with these concave questions
and inflection points
I've watched a few videos and read from different books
ok what is concave
oh, like concavity
yeah
well most examples just talked about this
and the second derivative
But here, I don't have the equation
So, I'm really not sure how I'm supposed to apply it other than just looking at the shape of the graph
yeah not super sure what I'm supposed to get from this.
sure
i see concavity as where the function “opens up to”
don’t know if that helps
yeah my professor made a similar statment
here is where the graph holds water and where it empties it
I get the idea
but I don't think I'm sure where the intervals are supposed to start and end I guess?
concave?
concave downward ?
if it's above the graph it concaves upward yeah
wha
the tangnet line
isn't that what you drew
oh wait
it's the second deriv
not the tangent line
i just drew the thing
okie
thats how i would solve it
well
okay
If I wanted to use the intervals, would I said, it concaves down at (0,1),(1,2) ?
yeah
how about the inflection point?
here
I thought it would be at x = 2
so the coordinates would be (2,3)
oh the inflection point was correct
I just didn't need the ()
wait, actually, idk if this helped me
cause like what is the blue line supposed to be again
just a line
okay it's just a line
ohhhhhh
lol
Closed by @sage socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm a little unsure how to start this question
should i just apply the transformation to the basis vectors in B
how do i ensure that the range ends up being a linear combination of vectors in the set D
@pine fox Has your question been resolved?
@pine fox Has your question been resolved?
@pine fox Has your question been resolved?
@pine fox Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pearl moon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not sure how to solve this.. something about telescoping rule?
Swear down every time that keisuke posts something, it gets asked by someone else moments later 
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just 25)c
I took values of x in the range: -2, 1, 0, 4, 5
ans indicates that 4 is the best possible value for x, since I get y as 5
??
take values of x really close to 3, like 3.01 or 3.001 or 2.99 or 2.999
got it
