#help-27
1 messages · Page 41 of 1
Closed by @sharp dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question 1: i need help to get the rest of the Euclidean division of P ( a polynomial in K[X] ) by (X-a)(X-b)
The rest should be written in function of a, b, P(a), and P(b).
<@&286206848099549185>
@burnt thunder Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
all I can say is, that it must be false.
as the source states, the "Proportional limit" is the point at which no plastic deformation has occurred yet.
sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/proportional-limit#:~:text=The proportional limit is the,returns to its original dimension.
In that case, you would be right to say, that the Proportional limit is at 80 mm
@stone crater Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did they get to that result that I highlighted at the bottom?
im not sure what identity they used to get that
did you read the first tip that is in red..?
i dont understand it
what specifically do you not understand
how did they get the 1+
is that just a method they use to get that 1+y?
cuz im just basing this stuff off a formula sheet but i didnt know you can just do that
develop sinx(1+cosx) and you will get the original sinx+sinxcosx
ohhhhhhhhh
man my teacher did not go over this
gave us a formula sheet and said gl lmfao
thanks guys
he doesn't have to thats some thing that can be used in any situation
he assumes a lot
compared to other teachers he doesnt really demonstrate examples like this
oh well
.close
Closed by @ashen quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok
will you close this yourself?
<@&268886789983436800>
.close
Closed by @celest dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
okay.
Topic: tangents
given is the function f with f(x) = x^2 - 3x +2 with a graph K(no graph in the book btw)
Determine the equation of the tangent on K in point P( 4 | f(4) )
do I have to show a graph here? even though the task doesn't specify
solution:
tangent equation in PSF: y = 5(x-4)+6
tangent equation in main shape: y = 5x - 14
what do I even have to do?
The derivative will give you your slope
And you know one of the points the line will have
^
@undone walrus Has your question been resolved?
Heyoo
Oki what I understand is
You have a function
And you want to find the tangent line at P(4, f(4))
Right?
@undone walrus
uh
^
Determine the equation of the tangent on K in point P( 4 | f(4))
@warped relic
Graph K?
yea
Hmm
I guess that's like "Figure 10" or something
Anyways
You have your f(x) = x^2 -3x +2
And you want your tangent line at x=4
Take the derivative of f(x)
$2x - 3$
TheLegend27
Oki
then I calculate the slope at x=4
$f´(4) = 2 * 4 - 3 = 5$
TheLegend27
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Oki
$y = m * x + b = 5 * x + b$
TheLegend27
Nope
?
VulcanOne
VulcanOne
so, this is correct?
You just find your b by plugging in x=4 and y = f(4)
?
Yep
TheLegend27
to isolate b
we also did that here
5(4) + b = 6
u get -1
TheLegend27
Same thing
no?
why bracket 4
OOOOOOH
this was also done -->
0.5 * 1 = 0.5 | /-0,5 = -1
now I see my mistake
okay okay
thank you :))))
TheLegend27
if I have to do -20 or (divide)20
when would I need to use division?
-5
3x = 5

Please get your own help channel
I'll check it out but please wait
.close
Closed by @undone walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think it is defining the delta epsilon
Basically, it's saying that, if you give me a number, no matter how small (ε), I can pick an interval around x = c (δ) where every single point in that interval (including at c) is within ε units from f(c)
This is identical to the definition of a limit, except we also look at x = c, while in limits, we don't
This manifests in the continuity definition saying "|x - c| < δ" while the definition of a limit says "0 < |x - c| < δ"
@reef tendon Has your question been resolved?
Do you intend on speaking or are you gonna leave the channel open without saying anything
Closed by @reef tendon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i find D coordinates
@warped widget Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi!
Solve the homogeneous one and guess for a particular solution
yes I have gotten to particular solution
x = t^2/4 -t/8 -1/8
do I just find general solution after this and solve?
got it! tysm!

.close
Closed by @quasi yoke
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sup my little cupids
why are you everywhere 👻
first one u can expand (z-a)(z-b)(z-y)
pretend the a b and y are the Greek symbols
alr
maybe u can use cosine rule and interpret through graphically
ohh yes u can do |w-a|^2 = (w-a)* (w*-a*) = |w|^2 - aw* - a*w + |a|^2
and use a+b+c= 0
and similarly for a* + b* + c*
yaey
missing my little white pie rn
@vivid cliff Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys, can you help me, i dont understand with half bottom of this proof, i dont understand how can b defined out of nowhere
the motivation is that it disagrees with each number in at least one digit
What if b is a repeating number, since a1,a2,... can be anything?
I mean how can we be sure that b != an
How would b = a_n given the definition?
Maybe, Since a_n can be irrational, there could be one that has the same value as b
Consider if they had the same value
Then that means, when a_n has a 5 in the decimal place, b does too
But, by definition, when a_n has a 5, b has a 4
b doesn't have to be irrational
And if a_n has something other than 5 in the decimal place, b must have that same number, which is different from 5
But when a_n has something other than 5, b has 5 by definition
No matter what, it's different
Closed by @marsh agate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's the difference between a collinear vector and a parallel vector?

None
Wut da phuk?
Different names for the same thing
Then why "show that these two vectors and collinear" Can't be proved it I prove it through parallel
By having their vector product 0
You can
Can I see?
:(
Ain't got it written
Either the teachers fault or you made a mistake somewhere
I guess that works too
Closed by @ember palm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If the sequence in a series does not converge to 0, then the series diverges. Does that mean a series never converges to a non-zero value?
pls help this is timed homework

u got here first sorry i leave

do you mean the value of the series itself, or its terms?
your first sentence is correct
your second statement is incorrect (e.g. geometric series)
i'll give you an example to make it clear maybe
$1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{8} + \cdots = \frac{1}{1-\frac{1}{2}} = 2$
tushar
I wonder because if the series can only converge if the sequence converges to 0 then I thought the series must also converge to 0, but I guess the first few terms can give it a non-zero value anyway?
ah yeah I see
exactly, or even all the terms
since converging to zero doesn't mean that any term has to take on the value of zero
ahhh okay
every term could still be contributing a varying positive amount to the sum
thank you 👍
happy to help
.close
Closed by @finite inlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm not sure how to simplify this properly
could someone assist me
do you know https://www.symbolab.com/
Symbolab: equation search and math solver - solves algebra, trigonometry and calculus problems step by step
could help
If a number is inside the root for example √45 just do the prime factorization of 45 and multiply the number outside of the root that is repeated twice
For exanple 2√45
45 = 5 × 3 × 3
2√5×3×3
2×3√5
6√5
oh ok
alr ty
what happens to the other x3
How do you define a number inside the root for example √9
Square root of √9 is 3 right
yes
Similiarly
√45 can be written as √9 × √5
So √9 becomes 3
3√5
Since we already have a 2 outside we multiply it with 3
To get 6√5
ah yes
right
alright ty
what about the denominator
how would u simplify √2025
.close
Closed by @digital ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
okayyyy
.close
Closed by @supple knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
lim
x---> infinity (2x+5/2x-1)^3x+4
find the first derivative
$\lim_{x \to \infty} \left( \frac{2x+5}{2x-1} \right)^{3x + 4}$?
Shenmaster
i considered the entire limit as y and did the logarithmic
That limit will turn out to be a number, so its derivative will be 0
lny = lim x---> infinity 3x+4 * ln(2x+5/2x-1)
= lim x---> infinity (2/2x-5 - 2/2x+1) /-3(3x+1)^-2
i don't know what to do after this point
oooooooooo
this is seems like it could be an interesting application of the limit definition of e
hmmm @supple knot what do u think
so
[
\lim_{x \to \infty} (\frac{2x+5}{2x-1})^{3x+4}
]
[
\to \lim_{x \to \infty} (1 + \frac{6}{2x-1})^{3x+4}
]
♡LexQa♡
what did you do here?
how come
You could also do this
do u know the limit definition of e
no
♡LexQa♡
just take the log then find the limit of that
i mean limit definition of e works too but 😵💫
i dont know that either
this is my second time approaching limits since high school
Do you know l'hospital?
yes
Try rewriting it like this
anyways from this,
[
\lim_{x \to \infty} (\frac{2x+5}{2x-1})^{3x+4}
]
[
\to \lim_{x \to \infty} (1 + \frac{6}{2x-1})^{3x+4}
]
[
\to \lim_{x \to \infty} (1 + \frac{3}{x-\frac{1}{2}})^{3x+4}
]
♡LexQa♡
wheres the limit?
how did we get 1+6
I didn't write it because i was lazy lol, its supposed to be there
so y = lim e^lny ---> (2x+5/2x-1) = e^(3x+4) ln(2x+5/2x-1)?
Fyi if you do \left and \right before each parentheses, it makes it bigger
Theres probably an easier way to solve it but this is how I did
just this really
Oops this was wrong
oh like
i dont know how to get to this point
[
\left(x \right)
]
♡LexQa♡
I've just never seen that before that why i showed this solution
We werent taught that limit in school
whats your solution in the end?
like what is the limit nearing to
1
no lol
no
it is e^9
Really?
i dont know how
anyways from this,
[
\lim_{x \to \infty} \left(\frac{2x+5}{2x-1}\right)^{3x+4}
]
[
\to \lim_{x \to \infty} \left(1 + \frac{6}{2x-1}\right)^{3x+4}
]
[
\to \lim_{x \to \infty} \left(1 + \frac{3}{x-\frac{1}{2}}\right)^{3x+4}
]
dldh06
oh thanks lots, never knew of it!
I forgot a +1 in my solution and it all went to hell
this simplifies to (e^3)^3 more or less, but explaining that is going to take so long, u might as well just live with someone else explaining it with l'hopital 
nobody explained it to me with lhopital
and everytime i asked someone i got a different method
sigh
.close
Closed by @fair crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@fair crescent
Do you know how to solve this limit with l'hopital?
Well if you write it like this it becomes 0/0 so you can use l'hopital
yes
You should be able to solve it from there
after that i use lhopital and get this
then idk what to do
You must have calculated something wrong
Because if you take the limit of that its equal to 9 so you get as a solution e^9 which i think you said was the right answer
that is equal to 9 but remember the limit is lny
No the limit is e^y
if you did it this way then limit is gonna be lny
cus u did ln of both sides
lny= all this (which you said was 9)
y = e^9
What i did was rewrite whats inside the limit like this
And then set everything thats on e exponent as y
ok i got it thank you
Closed by @timber patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i’m not sure where i went wrong
u wrote $$x+4\cdot x^2$$ to equal $$x+4+x^2$$
light
you can further reduce the top and bottom by x
i thought when they multiply it’s adding?
$$\frac{x+4}{2x}\cdot\frac{x^2}{3(x-8)}$$
light
thats essentially what u have
no, its multiply
$$\frac{a}{b}\cdot\frac{c}{d}=\frac{a\cdot c}{b\cdot d}$$
light
so how do i get to the correct answer from this?
x^2 is just (x)(x)
$$\frac{x+4}{2\cancel{x}}\cdot\frac{(x)\cancel{(x)}}{3(x-8)}=\frac{x+4}{2}\cdot\frac{x}{3(x-8)}$$
light
then multiply the numerators together and then multiply the denominators together
so combine the like terms (x) to get it squared?
yeah you would get x^2 + 4x for the numerator
wait how do i get that if there are only two x on the numerators?
wdym?
how do i get x^2 + 4x with x + 4 * x
$$x\cdot x + 4\cdot x$$
light
Closed by @wooden island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help me solve this! Please explain as well as you can, and be patient, as I am stupid sometimes
which part do you need help in?
@verbal robin
@verbal robin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
can someone help me with a discord server?
This is a math helping server.
If you are asking for help in non-math related, please close this channel.
do you have server that helps with discord server
No
im wait for someone
Closed by @urban marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this question
@wet fox Has your question been resolved?
Okey, so we need to construct a matrix of linear transformation such that goes from $e_3$ to $e_3$, so $[P]_{e_3}^{e_3}$, right?
marejak023
thats not what it is asking tho
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wait what is it the? i thought that they need the matrix that will do transform
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
its asking for the expression of the matrix in the basis {e_i} (1<= i <= 3)
@cobalt mauve
$P*e_1 = e_3 \eq \matr[b]{a&b&c\d&e&f\g&h&i}* \matr[b]{1\0\0} = \matr[b]{0\0\1}$
Mehdi_Moulati
you dont even need to go that far

.close
Closed by @reef sable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
saved u the time 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
doing some desmos art, is there any funtion that does that s like shape in between me two lines htat i already made
maybe a logistic?
ahhhh thnx ill take a look
.close
Closed by @waxen stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this question
i need to simplify it but i got no clue how to start
tried to use de morgans law first with the double complement law but i just got more confused
the only i thought of doing it is like this
but am not sure if thats correct
wait
im gonna try to solve it now
the answer is 1
- is union
• is intersection
you use the de morgans law first
and then you see that we have A union not A
which is 1
and we also have C union not C
which is also 1
1 union with any other element is 1
hm
yeah i think yes
I did the exercise like its a Boolean algebra exercise
you did it the Math way
but its the same thing
only different symbols
maybe am not sure
how is that called in your book?
which school lesson is that?
and which subject is that?
discreet mathematics simplifying sets
that one of the inverse laws
yeah
A U not A = U
yeah
thats correct
the answer is U
U in math is the same as 1 in Boolean algebra
are bad?
do you need help with any other exercises?
okay np
.close
Closed by @boreal sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i swear its impossible to put it in the form alog(7)
u cannot simplify 7log7 - 7log8 to alog7
not necessarily
i havent actually done the calculation but it say b is an integer
could be negative
no no
ive integrated it
i just typed it wrong
But yea
thanks didnt see that
.close
Closed by @small raptor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For all complex numbers z, z=a+bi is such that z is an element of complex numbers, a is Re(x), b is Im(x)
How do I write that in set notation?
would you like to write the set of complex numbers?
what set do you want to write?
ℂ

what is x?
i mean its an exponent of i and itself is real, but bi is imaginary as a whole
the problem is weird, i always use Re z and Im z
cause, how can Im be Im(x)
yeah, maybe x is a new variable?
@coarse current Has your question been resolved?
Z∈C
idk
z∈ℂ <-> [∀z=a+ib ∃a=Re & ∃b=Im]
i dont rly understand what do you want
it should be ∈ before Re and Im, instead of =
If $x\in\bC$ is fixed, then
$${z=a+bi\in\bC:a=\operatorname{Re}(x)\land b=\operatorname{Im}(x)}={x}$$
lol
Whoops typo
Lorago
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to find the limit of (1-e^x)/(ln(1-x)) [x→0]? Without using L'hôpital's rule
$\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{1 - e^x}{\ln(1-x)}$
VulcanOne
@mystic lava Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I find the two points that can pass a line with the slope of 5/2
FinnaganFox
$y=\frac{5}{2}x$
you can plug in any number for the x, and the y that comes out with it will be a point on that line.
for example, if you input 0, and get out 0, a point on the line is (0, 0)
Closed by @wanton harness
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
I need help learning how to divide a function into parts
from modulus
Example ^
Can someone explain?
Consider different intervals for values of x
wdym
What happens when x = 0? When x > 0 but < 1 (0 < x < 1)? And so on...
You're trying to split the function into cases like the second image, yes?
yes
The interval I mention here should help
Think about what happens when x > 1 and when x < 0, the function behaves simply then
What about the sign
Sign? I just mean play around with x values in certain intervals until you get a sound idea of how it behaves
Like drawing the function you mean
You can get a better idea of the graph too, sure
But, I purely mean putting in x into f(x) and looking at value of the different expressions in f(x)
Like, x = 1/2 => f(x) = 0.5 * e^-|-1/2| = 0.5 * e^-0.5
So the inside of the exponent is negative here. For what values might it be positive?
- | -1 - 1 | or | -(-1-1) |
If x = -1, then it's -|-1 - 1|
1
only for 1
right?
@onyx basin Has your question been resolved?
I mean the just expression x - 1. But a more useful approach to this would be to consider the values -|x-1| can take when x is between 0 and 1; what values it can take when x < 0 and when x > 1. So, look at the intervals [0, 1], (-infinity, 0), and (1, infinity).
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i find the domain of F(x)?
Haven't done questions like that, maybe solve the definite integral and find the domain afterwards?
you need to respect to the intervals(a,b)
the part where x need to be bigger than 4 i can get
the what
[X,4x]
oh you not from the uk
yeah
so we call them a,b but they given the vaules x and 4x
yeah but how does that give back that domain
because
unless i choose and interval which contains 4 everythings good
i have an asymptote on 4
so definite integrals, the domain of the integral can be found by visually inspecting the lower and upper bounds applied on the integral
i can definitely tell the domain by just solving the integral and then calculating the domain afterwards
i thought there would be a way of calculating it without going through that
think its safest to do with integrals
it works for all?
im not sure ill be honest with you
@modern wind Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
y[x]=y'[x-1]
A bullshit solution I found is just the lim of n to infinity of f(nx) where f is just any normal trig function
Other than that I have no idea
Cant think of any function (that doesnt involve infinity anywhere) where its equal to its derivative from one second ago
Generalizing it definitely doesnt help
I probably need a starting value or something
well most differential equations need a starting value
is there more context or is this just something you came up with?
there are delay differential equations but they are instead of the form y'(x) = y(x-1)
I guess maybe you could try running the time backwards
Tinkering around
Sounds interesting
Do you have any online resource for delay differential equations?
no sorry
this doesnt make sense do you mean y' evaluated at x-1? what are you differentiating wrt?
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you prove this
hmm there are a couple ways to get there
equivalently, $x^2 - 2x + 1 \geq 0$
Ø
but I would suggest trying to get a term that is always geq or the likes
which can be rewritten as something ^2
ok let me work it out
well the question boils down to, does multiplying two numbers yield higher or lower value than addition ?
intuitively it makes sense I just can't seem to formally explain it
Ah, ok
and I get (x-1)^2 but I don't know where to go from there
Wouldn't it be equal to 2x for those values then ?
the current setup is (x-1)^2 >= 0
How about contradiction proof, I feel it can be helpful
$\forall x \in \mbb{R} : x²+1 ≥ 2x \
\text{negating the proposition} \
\exists x²+1 ≤ 2x$
you can also say x^2 + 1 -2x + 2x >= 2x
(x-1)^2 +2x >= 2x
So maybe I should ask how you would formally write the proof
I would definitely go with contradiction, which is what I am trying to think of it since it is a lot for formal ig
Ah, I can prove a smaller version of it to build upon it
$\forall x \in \mbb{R} , x ≥ 2 : x² ≥ 2x$
I can definitely further build on this if I am able to remove x≥ 2 and add +1
right
@placid fjord is this proposition formally provable for u ?
Sure
Yep
okay now im getting a good idea on how to do the original problem
where are you guys going with this. why are you abandoning the (x-1)^2 thing
Idk, it just didn't let us much further ig ? Maybe we can proof using that too, but we couldn't think about so we tried many different ways as well as simplifying proof
Oh ok
what do we know about square numbers with respect to their sign
you can (probably) take for granted that the square of any real number is nonnegative
They are always positive ?
yes
well non-negative
but you mean the correct thing
so what does this mean for the inequality (x-1)^2 >= 0
ah so it will always be non-negative
Makes sense now ^=^
uhh
it's fine
why not start from: if $x$ is a real number, $x-1$ is a real number. the square of any real number is nonnegative, thus $(x-1)^2 \geq 0$.
but implicitly uses more knowledge about quadratics
increases only for x > 1
namely that if a quadratic has a single root and positive sign then it also has the minimum there
positive leading coefficient
tushar
ok so maybe this is a bit cleaner then:
yes
nice thank you guys
I didn't finish it lol
It got confusing with too much text
And also it has ALOT of errors and typos
not sure what you are trying to do. definitely overcomplicating stuff
Yeah I will write it better
how do I mark as solved?
QED, or write a square.
I meant the channel lol
.close
Closed by @wooden zodiac
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
(x-1)^2>=0 and "(x-1)^2 is nonnegative" say the same thing
ok so I don't even have to say that nonnegative part then
a>=0 and "a is nonnegative" are different ways to write the same thing
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do i use integration by part to differentiate this
just hand wave and differentiate under the integral
Grandpa was fun while it lasted I guess
Also yellow on the pfp looks weird. I got so used to the green, I preferred it
yellow is hgigher social status
maybe i'll go back to green in the future. but credit to @copper flower for the change. i'm too old to learn how to do such fancy photo editing
or discord status? idk
i agree with mateo713
Guys, help Melina instead of having a coffee conservation 🤓
U have to take the derivative of bestelling?
Bessel*
can you show both your attempt and answer?
yeah integral representation of generating bessel
wait a min please
did they differentiate with respect to t ?
can you show the whole page
riemann
so $\frac{\pa}{\pa x} f(x,t) = -\sin(nt - x\sin(t)) \sin(t)$
riemann
still different from the answer
yea i can see that
i asked the professor about this one before
and he said its done using integration by parts
so maybe the same for this one
try it with the product of these two functions
but they're not related
what do you mean?
you can try to do integration by parts on anything that has a product
oh im sorry i didn't know what you were referring to
v' should be the simpler one
but i will have to work only with -xsin(t)
v' = dv/dt in this case
nope. you're doing integration with respect to t
the problem involves multiple steps
in order to get their answer, you must first differentiate with respect to x, then you must integrate by parts with respect to t
if you just plugged this in, you'd have an equivalent expression. but they explicitly want a different one shown, so you do IBP to get to it
@peak geode Has your question been resolved?
Evaluate at the endpoints
You lost a minus sign from du
Oh did it cancel the minus sign from IBP
Do what twice
yeah and then ?
You lost an x here
Compare yours to the image. You're almost there
yeah but that was a differentiation
a lost x ?
Fixed
Chain rule. Your answer is different by an x
yes i see it now
but i have a minus here
oh no its right
i finally got the result
Thank you so much !
@peak geode Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where does it say characteristic equation?
Show the full page
I’m taking a bath rn, can’t. Just assume it said it ig

Oh this is just sum and angle identity
weird
@restive river Has your question been resolved?
It's the sum identity for tangent
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, what happened to the cosine square on the right? I don't see it 🥺
they've just factored out -cos(x)
^
you can check this by expanding the bottom
it'll be the same as the top
@split radish Has your question been resolved?
thank you so much! I'll make sure to do that next time c:
Closed by @split radish
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@tidal notch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Context: BO and CO are bisectors of their corresponding angles. r - radius of the inscribed circle. The trapezoid is isosceles.
My question is how does segment QC become b/2 and QB a/2
oh also angle BOC is 90 degrees
this is an ellips right?
wdym?
if you're looking at this image as a 2dimensional image then the circle is just an ellips
it's kinda confusing my head
oh ok
the image is just an example

please ping when you send a message, I will be watching YT

Search up power of a point
Anyways, it's just that when you have a dot, and two tangent line segments to the circle which also pass through the dot, they're equal
It's easy to prove by just noting that a tangent is always 90 degrees to center, and so you construct a right triangle

Hope that helps
yuck
I remember there was something of that nature in pervious topics about circle
I think two grades ago

anyway gotta go
.close
Closed by @heavy terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So solve the system of equations?
I'm guessing you want to know how much each box weighs?
let's say a large box weighs a kg and a small box weighs b kg.
Then 2a +3b = 77 and 4a+8b = 181
you have alot of options to find a and b
Substitution for example
@tidal notch Has your question been resolved?
@tidal notch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tidal notch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with q 3c
Q3c^
If one could explain what they done near the end by which they split the integral into separate fractions
Surely there’s other ways to tackle this
That's splitting into partial fractions
First thing is writing u^2 = u^2 - 4 + 4
$\frac{u^2}{u^2 - 4} = \frac{u^2 - 4 + 4}{u^2 - 4} = 1 + \frac{4}{u^2 - 4}$
numbpy
Dayum, I wouldn’t think of doing it that way cl
How’d you type that so fast btw 😂
Tysm, lemme work through it once more so I can get a better gidt
Also another question
then you can write 4 = (u + 2) - (u - 2) and do similar as above
In this question type, they didn’t specify what to use for the substitution, in this case would you substitute for u what looks the most tricky
Substitutions are almost always tricky so you can only get better with practise
4=?
$\frac{4}{u^2 - 4} = \frac{(u + 2) - (u - 2)}{u^2 - 4} = \frac{u + 2}{u^2 - 4} - \frac{u - 2}{u^2 - 4}$
Last equality is incorrect
My bad, typing mistake



