#help-26
1 messages · Page 195 of 1
I did AC= a+(4/5)(b-a)
OC is (1/5)a + (4/5)b.
Yeah
So my answers rn
Are
AB= b-a
AC= (4/5)(b-a)
CB= (4/5)b+a
OC= (1/5)a +(4/5)b
Remember, vectors represent both magnitude (length) and direction.
So, a and b not only tell you the distance from the origin O to points A and B, but also the direction.
Sources and related content
yes
Yhh
yeah ik lol im just being braindead
anymore questioN?
I don't think so, ty
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @fossil moss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Discrete math btw,
Why did we put S----> t
at the sstart
and i dont understand the steps below
um, well, s -> t is the second premise
Ik but why didnt we put -r ----> s at the start
why did we put the second premise at the start
because that's what we were using first
@sweet vigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sweet vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i do this?
You can factor A^2 + I
How?
I thought you can’t factor a sum of squarws
U there?
use imaginary numbers
.close
Closed by @toxic stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
@stoic badger Has your question been resolved?
@stoic badger Has your question been resolved?
@stoic badger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Surely there's an easier way
why did u do F'(x)/F(x) ?
Seems you changed the function midway
Derivative of ln(f(x)) wrt x
Other than this, seems alright (and easily fixed, change the 4s to 1s within those logs)
Presumably they want the derivative of f?
my thought process was: ln(fx)' = 1/f(x) * f'(x)
ok
cuz I didnt know how to do it any other way
which is why I'm asking if there's an easier way or if I'm even correct cuz this is quite the process
u could use the dervivative of a composition of functions
(gof)' = f' * g'of
are u french ?
I see, but how would I go about it here
I speak both
up to u if you wanna use french
no it was to know if u were in terminale
ok
and actually i thiink it would be the same with it
so idk another way
Closed by @glossy ruin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If (1^2)cm = 1cm, then why when we convert the centimeters to millimeters 1cm = 10mm, when we do the same operation the result is 100mm which is 10cm?
Is it that 1^2 = 10?
Like, how does this work? Because as far as i know 1^2 = 1*1 = 1
probably what you're looking for is:
(1 cm)^2 = (10 mm)^2 = 100 mm^2
why is 1*1cm = 1 but 10*10mm = 100 if 10mm = 1cm
$1^2$ cm and $1$ cm$^2$ are two different things. You probably meant the latter
SWR
Units
Indeed
Ok give me a second
Okay
1cm =10mm
You are wondering why 1cm²=100(mm)²
Correct?
100² as in 100×100?
It's not true
Yea i just wrote it wrong, sorry
due to 1cm = 10mm
Yeah
Ok so what operation are you doing to get 1²cm=10²mm
I'll assume you are squaring the equation 1cm=10mm
if you square both sides of the equation
1 cm = 10 mm
you get
(1 cm)² = (10 mm)²
1² cm² = 10² mm²
the units square too
Exactly
Ooohhh
1000ml
In volume
1000ml^3
Milli litre is just thousanth of a litre
Noooo
1L =1000mL
Milli stands for thousandth
Ok
Try this
How many millimetres in a metre
1000mm
Yes
There are many units of volume
One is Litre
1L=1000cm³
Remember volume is some sort of side×side×side
So cm³
Ok
Now can you tell me how many Litres does 1m³ of water have
1L?
Try again
Ok you know the relationship between 1metre and 1cm
And there is a relationship between cm and litre
So let's find it?
1m=100cm
yes
1m^3 = 100cm^3
1m=100cm
Yess
And 100³=10⁶
What about 1?
Oh
1m^3 = 100^3cm^3

Or 1m^3
so 1m³=1000L from 1m³= 1000 × (1000cm³)
Oh
Well i think i understand now
So due to 1000cm^3 = 1L, 1000cm^3 = 1m^3, thus 1000L = 1m
So lemme get this straight , 1L is the 1000th of 1m^3
Yes
👍
Closed by @wet steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Solve the equation cos 3𝑥 =1/2 Answer exactly in radians.
what do I start with?
cos^-1 on both sides
Should there be 2 solutions for it?
Where n is any integer
what about the rule cosθ= 1/2 ⇒θ= π/3 or θ= 5π/3
Yeah exactly
You see you are getting 2 results
But theta =-5pi/3 is also a correct solution
So is theta =-pi/3
Please check the question, they would have given a particular interval
Just solve it and answer in Rads
yeah 100%
It's Swedish though
what about this?
do you solve 3x = ∏/3 + 2n∏
x = ∏/9 + 2n∏/3
do you need ± if there are infinite solutions?
Yes
Not really
Haha
If n is integer, not really
Because n can be negative also, yes?
So + is also enough
could be anything, everything on the table
Closed by @supple merlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
5/12 is used as a/b for division point
i cannot find x and i have test tmrw
im going crazy how do i start
i found out the point xp,yp as 540, 180
but idk how to aplly the forula
formula
how do i use pythagoras?
no?
Assuming the two lines are perpendicular, you can find the equation of this
And then the intercept follows directly
If you’re not given that they’re perpendicular, then there’s not enough information to solve
@torn geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
We were told to show f:R²->R with f(v) = v1+v2² in the two euclidean metric spaces (R², d1) and (R, d2) is continuous, but I can't prove it (via epsilon-delta)
It's trivially continuous by different arguments, but I can't determine a delta for eps-delta
helps to remember that the distances you're talking about are well under 1
so squaring makes things get smaller
hm but how can I relate the two distances
|f(v)-f(w)| = |v1+v2²-w1-w2²|
|v-w| = √((v1-w1)²+(v2-w2)²)
v2 I think otherwise yes, but then it becomes
< delta + delta * (delta + 2|v2|)
But don't get to a point where it's independent of w by bounding |v-w| < delta
|v2^2 - w2^2| = |v2 - w2| |v2 + w2|
Yeah, I've been there at the start too, then I used delta ≤ 1
which meant |v1-w1| ≤ 1
and |v2-w2| ≤ 1
but then I still can't get of w in |v2+w2|
|v2 - w2| < delta, so |v2 + w2| leq |v2 - w2| + 2|w2| < delta + 2|w2|
huh my messages disappeared
nice
in short: then I'm at < delta + delta * (delta + 2|v2|)
here I wasn't sure if one can find a delta
oh i am just blind, lol
my main issue is that I either stumble into not eliminating w or not being able to determine a delta, so I should rather focus on getting better at finding a formula for delta :]
should this be v2 or w2?
Does this approach work generally, trying:
delta + delta * (delta + 2|v2|) < eps
and solving for delta
v2, v is given
Or no I should limit delta again right
e.g. delta < 2|v2|
so v is your arbitrary point not w
ys
then
... < delta + delta * 4|v2| = delta * (1+4|v2|)
delta < eps / (1+|v2|)
yay
why didn't I limit delta again before
thx for guiding 😄
high lin alg no issue but when encountering basic ana problems I feel like I'm stuck in the 1st semester haha
i prob would have done delta^2 leq delta there, similar to what Hayley was getting at
I.e. < delta (2 + 2|v2|)
I'll remember repeating limiting
since the issue here is if v2 is 0
and even if not 0 then i don’t know if that works
oh well
🎉
Closed by @scenic flare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
draw in the segments connecting the centers of the circles
I got 9pi for the area, but I’m not sure if that’s right @brazen remnant
show steps
i don't think that's correct
How come?
the top of the smaller circles are not the same height as the bottom of the bigger circle, thats why your step of doing 8 - 2 to find the diameter of the bigger circle is incorrect
Yeah, I realize that now
How would I approach it? Like this? 2^2 + (2+r)^2 = 4?
what does the length of the red segment need to be?
8
So my equation would work, wouldn’t it?
no?
where did you get your equation from
now what is the length of the green segment
no, it's not 4
if the whole thing is 8 and one part is r, what is the other part?
if i have a stick of length 8 inches and i cut off r inches, how long is the remaining piece?
8-r
Yes
so you now have a right triangle with legs of length 2 and 8-r and a hypotenus of length r+2
@old plover Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @old plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, I'm not sure where to go from here
@merry bridge
sup
after you reach that point where you put m as dy/dx
you can put the point 12,3 in place of x and y
to find x0 and y0
for the actual slope?
you will need another equation
which will be by satisfying the point in the actual curve
yess dy/dx as you found out -x/4y
so -12/4(3)?
you have 2 equations and 2 unknowns you should be able to solve remember you'll get 2 answers
but that's -1 which seemingly misses
the tangent line isn't at (12, 3), it crosses (12, 3)
oh
you can also put x0 y0 in curve to get another equation
like so?
then try solving simon-tenously (idk how to spell)
I can't put it in the -x/4y because that's the slope, and the slope can't be -1
there is an easier method that requires you to use the direct formula... you study it in the ellipse chapter in coordinate geometry
the slope is also -x0/4y0
its not -x/4y
@merry bridge Has your question been resolved?
you are doing it wrong sir
you have to put 12,3 in place of x y (or x1 y1 in your equation)
not x0 y0
x0 and y0 is a point on the curve for which dy/dx is equal to -x0/4y0
that doesn't make sense? why would it be in the place of x and y? Normally when we find the equations of tangent points, we put the points where the tangent line must pass through on x_0 and y_0, then we set the equation of the point-slope form equal to the original equation
yes you are correct when the point is on the curve
in this question the point lies outside of the curve
no, even when the point isnt on the curve.
so your method is wrong
no no
that is not how it works
i suggest you try revising your notebook or textbook you refer to
or try solving a solved problem for same
This is how both the textbook and my instructor have taught it.
i am sorry but that's not how i was taught
i did the question with my method and i got the same answer
your instructor taught you correctly but its different
@merry bridge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @merry bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi so if i have to make an equation in the form of y=-(x+a)(x+b) and i have the coordinates 5,0 and 3,0 to sub in how would i do that
and why would you do it
Providing the original question can give more context
oh wait I misread
well by definition, (5, 0) and (3, 0) are roots of the quadratic
okay
and the roots of y = -(x - a)(x - b) are a and b
In the same equation
basically you need the zero product property actually
You should get a linear equation in 2 variables a and b
don't think about subbing in directly cause it won't work
or it will be longwinded
hold on i'm so confused so
so if y = 0, -(x + a)(x + b) = 0
zero product propertly implies x + a = 0 or x + b = 0
so now you can sub in x, say 5 + a = 0 and 3 + b = 0
yep exactly
so it's y = -(x - 5)(x - 3) bingo
oh got it
i think idk i'm so confused on why we have to solve for x when we already have it
ngl
yeah like you want to solve for a and b ofc
yeah like there is a small thing we glossed over
say we can sub in x = 5 into x + b = 0 instead
that's not an issue
and x = 3 into x + a = 0 instead
so you get -(x - 3)(x - 5) then
but that's the same, cause the order of multiplication doesn't matter
so then x is five and x is 3
but tf
i'm so confused
but wait nvm
we found a and b
okay so it's not as complicate as it looks
more like we can choose which x value to use
and both of them give the y value as 0
so if we get two points with x coordinates we just sub it in
yes
sub the 2 different x values into the 2 linear equations
what if u get a y coordinate
oh yeah if you have two different points in general
say 5 = -(2 + a)(2 + b)
and 10 = -(3 + a)(3 + b)
now we're talking, that's fairly spicy actually
(if you have two points with the same x-coordinate but different y-coordinates, that's not a function by definition)
@lunar oriole Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@sonic ibex
next time ask in an open help channel
was it not open?
it doesn't
yes I was about to show you the way
can you post the original system of equations pls
okay so you want to find (y - 2)^2 = y^2 - 4y + 4
y^2 = 2x - 2y + 5
so y^2 - 4y = 2x - 6y + 5
= 2(x - 3y) + 5
so there you go, y^2 = 2 * 5 + 5 + 4
huh
which part did you not get?
where did you get the = part
just expand (y - 2)(y - 2)
so you just rearrange for y^2 like I did
and subtract -4y
the trick is you don't need to find what y is!!
still dont get it
ok now which part don't you get
why you dont need to solve for y and expading it
cause there's a trick in the question
such that the numbers work out
that solving for y is not the most efficient way
.close
@smoky sparrow Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @whole geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
I need help
Should I just write Inf(4A-2B)= Inf(4A)-Inf(2B) , release the two and switch inf to sup?
Sry wrong channel
First, maybe think about why -B is a bounded below set, when B is a bounded above set
🤔
Should I just write Inf(4A-2B)= Inf(4A)-Inf(2B) , release the two and switch inf to sup? (My assumption doesn’t work) ?
Forget inf and sup, and recall the definition of being bounded below / above
Okay this may sound dumb, but for every x, x<s (s is the upper bound). Multiplying by negative will flip the inequality -x>-s boom lower bound
It's better to say that you subtract x and s from both sides of the equation rather than multiplying by (-1) to get -x > -s imo, but yeah, that's it essentially
Ah
Now, try to show that 4 A + 2 (-B) is bounded below
You already know that A and (-B) are bounded below
I mean the thing is, it’s common sense but I am struggling to translate it to math
You already wrote what it means to be bounded below
All elements a of A are bounded below by some constant c, so a >= c. Same thing holds for elements -b of -B with another constant d, so -b >= d.
What can you say about elements of 4 A + 2 (-B) then, which can be written as 4 a - 2 b, where a is in A and b is in B?
4 a - 2 b >= 4c +2d , where 4c +2d equals to some constant k?
Yeah, that's it
Closed by @mystic wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The question asks to find a double intégral of 3x^2 with the limits of the D region. The D region is defined by the inequilaties from the first picture, graphically is just an intersection marked in red from the second picture. I tried to make limits from the given inequalities, personally I found describing the shape in limits rather difficult so I skipped any circle coordinates. Unfortunately, I don't have any corrections, so I would like to check what are you thinking about this question.
I do have a suspicion that the big fraud moment might be coming from the first integral's limits.
feel free to ping me :3
Here's the clarification what needs to be calculated (if the word description is bizzare)
@rocky prawn Has your question been resolved?
what did you do?
@rocky prawn Has your question been resolved?
@rocky prawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me understanding this introduction rule in Natural Dedction?
Does it mean, assume that A is true, from there we can derive B
I.e, B is a logical consequence of A
So, anytime I have formula B, I can say that B is true because A is true?
@velvet spear Has your question been resolved?
@velvet spear Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @velvet spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@finite mango Has your question been resolved?
Where did you get your perimeter equation from. 24 = 2y+...
@finite mango Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @finite mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey im trying to simplify this into q^k to calculate the limit but im kinda stuck rn. Anyone got an idea how i can simplify this furter or if 've made a mistake already
It looks OK to me, but you might be able to make some progress if you let 4^k = 2^(2k) and complete the square.
rather than combining them into one sum, it would probably be simpler to calculate the two sums separately
but yeah, separating the sums is probably better.
Closed by @pliant horizon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i know how to find a tangent and normal line to the curve written in canonical form but not in general and i have no idea how to go to canonical in this example because of xy
but i cant isolate y here
i got y^2, xy and y
i tried implicit differentiation but it always gave wrong answer
i get y' = (2x - y + 1)/(x + 2y - 1) in the result
i have tried this way but when i plug in 0.6 and 1.2 i get wrong coeffitients
So if you did implicit differentiation, then you have the slope of the curve at any point on the curve
Maybe you could show?
If you then use the coordinate (x, y) on the curve you have the point slope form of the line
And finally to find the normal, you just use the fact that the normal is perpendicular to the tangent
wait you are right
sorry i had some misunderstanding
sorry
thank you
is this appliable to any curve?
Yes
Yes
in class we studied specific formulas for each curve and didnt use implicit differentiation
Provided it's not misbehaving in some way
Um
Like what?
Like infinite slopes or kinks in the curve or so on
I mean you have to derive those formulas somehow
Closed by @vast maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What am I missing here for (b):
its negative lol
Closed by @shrewd shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, quick question
can i sketch 1/x given a function f(x)
i know i can graph 1/f(x) but is 1/x something that can be done ?
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
.close
Closed by @echo dew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
oh ok
success!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If A is a positive semidefinite matrix, then is the null space of X^T A X the same as AX?
@strong sable Has your question been resolved?
@strong sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why am i getting -189 as my determinant and not 189?
,w Det[{{-1, 6, -2}, {6, -2, -1}, {-2, 3, 5}}]

but if i were to manually find the determinant?
oh wait lol mb yea i did and im not sure why the textbook says that its 189
misprint
Closed by @vocal dew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
-sigh-
even after simplifying the root id still be wrong
idk where i went wrong or if i even did this right ;-;
answer!!
,rotate
,rotate
Give me a moment.
nwrs! im greatful for your help ❤️
You used the diameter instead of the radius.
Yes.
and small be x^2(pi)(x)?
Yes.
okok!!
oh?
OH
NOW I GET IT
okok i got it now!!
tysm kookiemon!!
❤️
yw
.close
Closed by @wintry siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey can't find exemple of a surjective group homomorphism $f : G \to H$ such that $f(Z(G)) \subsetneq Z(H)$. Can someone help me pls ?
mid
@paper ether Has your question been resolved?
i think that i should take H abelian group so that H = Z(H) but have no idea how to find G and the morphism
take the signature homomorphism on S3
you know it's surjective onto {-1,1}
and yet identity is the only element of Z(S3)
@paper ether does that help
Closed by @paper ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for the 2nd problem i don't know how to involve theta in the equation
when the system isn't at an angle, the equation for mass I got was m=(kx^2)/v^2
just add the gravitational potential energy of the mass into the original equation you derived, so:
1/2 (mv^2)=1/2 (kx^2)+mgh
where is theta going to be used?
I don't think it is needed
its part of the answer though
I cant figure how it is necessary. It is only necessary to calculate the acceleration, and forces, so f=mgsintheta
yeah i dont think so to
i think the angle somehow affects the potential energy but idk how
If we are to calculate the potential energy, it will simplify to mgh? E=fd= mgsintheta*h(1/sintheta)=mgh? Is it going to affect the potential energy in the spring?
i have the answer to the solution but idk how to get there do you want me to send it
ok
they didn't even simplify it and set it =m but it doesn't really matter
im not sure why they add the horizontal distance
OH when you extended it it will go further back than h
that additional height is calculated with x*sintheta
No it is the height that is gained by the block when you pulled it back by x
so they're using the x like the "hypotenuse" right and sin of the angle is the additional height right
i thought they were doing like the force of gravity and doing sin Fg which would've been the distance traveled along the track
ok that makes a lot more sense now
yeah its simpler than that
no problem
.close
Closed by @glad root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do this??
My teacher isn’t giving any pre-lesson instructions. This if from Algebra 2
If someone can give me an example of how to complete this, I can do the rest on my own
Are you familiar with the equation of a parabola in vertex form?
Nope
Every time I ask my teacher for help, he says the same thing but with different words and doesn’t explain anything
poopoo shared it just above
lovely username
The basic graph of a parabola is described by the equation y=x²
okay so it’ll be y = a (x - 3)^2 + 2
for which problem?
- p(3,2)
is this the “equation of the parabola”
And how do I tell if the graph opens up or down
because they’re positives, it’d open up right?
yes
yes to thats the equation of the parabola, yes to it opens up, or yes to all of the above?
both
okay awesome
if x^2 is positive it opens up
so i just apply the same knowledge to the rest of the questions?
awesome thank you. as for 9-17, how do i turn those graphs into an equation?
This is incorrect
it would help to first learn about the vertex form of a parabola. I can give you a crash course, but reading your math book will help you so much more
we dont have math books really
wild
yeah my teacher is ass. not much i can do about it
idk how you're expected to do this then without the knowledge or an ability to learn it
he kinda expects us to already know
he just gives us our paper, tells us how one problem is solved, and expects us to do the rest, but i havent been able to be in class so ive been doing it online
i havent had the example
ouch
okay well, then yeah you need to learn about parabolas and vertex form
the basic form of a parabola is simply y=x². By basic form, I mean that the shape of its graph will be the overall characteristic of what a parabola looks like, but it does not describe every parabola. You can think of it like y=x describing the basic form of a line, but y=x is not the only line. You can translate lines, scale them, what have you
First, it's important to describe some properties of parabolas
The vertex of a parabola is defined as the turning point. Visually, it's the lowest point in a parabola that increases upward, or its the highest point in a parabola decreasing downward
,w plot y=x^2
Yeah I know the vertex
for y=x², the lowest point of the parabola is at (0, 0), so the vertex of the parabola y=x² is simply (0, 0)
Yee
Partially
So let y=f(x) be some arbitrary function. It doesn't matter what f(x) is, just draw in your head whatever graph you like
Okay
imagine now you wanted to graph y=f(x)+1
okay
idk if makes visual sense to you that basically the whole graph would move up now by 1 unit
example:
,w plot y=x^2+1
Yeah I gotchu
Note how the graph translated upward compared to the original graph here
there are vertical translations, because we move the graph vertically.
Next, we care about horizontal translations
These are a bit harder to describe conceptually
So we change the X?
yes, but do you know how?
Nope- Im a bit dense
no worries, it's hard to visualize at first
So let y=f(x) be the graph of some function.
Let's say that we want y=g(x) be some graph the looks exactly like the graph of y=f(x), but moved 1 to the right
it’d be y=g(1) right?
So if (a, b) is some point in the graph of f, then we're gonna (a+1, b) to be a point in the graph of g. Does that make sense at all?
kinda yea
im sorry you have to educate me lmao
math isnt my strong suit if it isnt obvious
no worries
But essentially, this is what we want to do
Something that gets overlooked often, but is very important to know: for the function y=f(x), the graph of f is basically a collection of points in the plane. Arbitrarily, every point can be described as just (x, y). But the function is given as y=f(x). So every point on the graph of is just (x, f(x)).
To reiterate, the graph of a function f is just every point (x, f(x))
(for which x is a valid input for f)
okay i think i understand
awesome
So, the graph of f is every point (x, f(x)), and like I shared earlier, the graph of g (which is f translated to the right by 1 unit) needs to be (x+1, f(x))
okay and here's where we get a little creative. We're going to make a new variable. Let's just call it z. The name doesn't matter. We're going to define z simply as z=x+1
If we solve for x, then x=z-1
we replace x in (x+1, f(x)) with z-1 and get (z, f(z-1))
So, the graph of g is just every point (z, f(z-1)) where z-1 is any valid input for g.
what would that look like?
soon
but remember that z was just an arbitrary variable name. It could still be x. That is, the graph of g is just every point (x, f(x-1)). By the definition of a point, we have y=f(x-1). But, but the definition of "graph of g", we also have y=g(x). Therefore, we get g(x)=f(x-1) (since they were both equal to y, they're equal to each other)
In summary, to move a function 1 unit to the right, it becomes f(x-1). In general, if we wanted to move some arbitrary k to the right, the translated function is f(x-k)
where did I lose you?
okay that makes sense
this is just the graph of y=x² moved 1 to the right
This is known as a horizontal translation
Okay, now this is where it gets important: we can mix horizontal and vertical translations.
Let's say we wanted to move a parabola 2 to the right, what would the equation be?
y = (x - 2)^2?
phew thank you ;-;
Now, let's say wanted to move this 3 units down. What would you do?
y = x^2 - 3?
close. I meant how would you translated the function that you already translated 2 to the right? (Or, how would you move y=x² 2 to the right and 3 down)?
yes. Good work
Okay yeah this makes sense
Now here's the important bit. We're gonna taklk about vertices
Remember that the vertex of y=x² was (0, 0)
yeah
(0, 0) was the lowest point on the graph. But we moved the graph 2 to the right and 3 down, so the vertex will also move 2 to the right and 3 down. So what must the coordinate of the vertex of the translated parabola be?
(2, 3)?
exactly right
Or well, because we moved it down, it’d be -3?
did we mean to move it up?
So 1. would be y = (x - 2)^2 +3? and the graph would open up?
the vertex would be (2, -3), not (2, 3) I was mistaken earlier
okay
YAY im actually learning 😭
So, having found that the vertex of y=(x-2)²-3 is (2, -3), what do you suppose is the vertex of the general parabola y=(x-h)²+k?
(h, k)?
Awesome!! Thank you so much
That's exactly why this is called the vertex form of the parabola
the only thing we did not discuss was a, the scale factor
but I assume you know how to use scale factor?
So in that case, problem 9 would be y = (x - 0)^2 + 4?
uhh maybe?
correct
I know what certain things look like, but im completely blank when it comes to the names
“things” being equations or formulas or whatever
What does scale factor look like?
I can explain in like an hour. I need to run to the pharmacy
All good! I actually think I can figure out Scale Factor on my own. Thank you so much!!!
I think I can solve the rest of the problems on my own now. You were a huge help so thank you

im gonna close this so someone else can use this channel
if i need more help ill reopen another channel
thank you!!
.close
Closed by @dawn ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i get 80?
120+320 is 440 right
yes
Closed by @lusty quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
okay?
how do i get 160 when z/w
what's z and w btw
z = 5(cos 120 + i sin 120)
and w = 3(cos 320 + i sin 320)
right
yes
Oh that's a ÷ symbol, not+
so z is 5(e^i(120))
and w is 3(e^i(320))
so z/w is (5/3)* e^i(120-320)
if that makes sense
how do i got 160?
-200 + 360 is 160
we can add and subtract 360 for trig angles remember that
Closed by @lusty quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so when i try to prove this limit of the sequnece using defitnion of limit
why doesnt it work when L = 1.1?
like limit iis 1, but when i put in L = 1.1, it seems to work as well
as well as plugging in 0.9
It doesn't work.
When epsilon is smaller than 0.1
- you get that any N works since your choice of N just requires that N is bigger than some negative number
- the last step in the inequality is not true.
0.1 + 5/N > 0.1 for any N,
so in particular if epsilon is less than 0.1, you can't have
0.1 + 5/N < epsilon.
@silent frigate Has your question been resolved?
oh wait i see hmm.
why would we get any N works since N is bigger than some negative number?
like when epsilon is smaller than 0.1?
You say that given any epsilon, we can just let $N > \frac{5}{\epsilon - 0.1}$.
Azyrashacorki
yes
But if epsilon is less that 0.1 this is negative
yes
yes, but isnt that okay?
because all that is reqwuired is that there exists some N
Well it's a hint that something is wrong with your choice of N.
If any N works and your sequence converges, then that means that the sequence is constant.
hmm i see
is it because of this then?, like the second parrt
Yes, essentially.
The difference between the terms and 1.1 gets close to 0.1, not 0
oh i see. Becuase you found an epsilon that doesnt work for this, since if epsilon < 0.1 then 0.1 + 5/n < 0.1, but at the same time is greater than 0.1
Yes that's the idea
i see. But what about for 0.9 then?
because my methdology was this
in order to find N
i did $|1 - 5/n - 0.9|$ < $\epsilon$
It's the same idea. The difference will get close to -0.1
LXDL