#help-26
1 messages · Page 191 of 1
so you derive x^2 into 2 after multiplying x^2 on the tops?
huh
wait but where did the 2 over x^2 go?
in the 5/x part u mean?
nono like
you have x^2(2/x^2...)
oh wait x^2 derived isn't even 2, hm
why did the x^2 and 2 flip places?
(not doubting you, just confused)
cz a* b=b* a
so I can write 2* x=x *2
the x^2 on top and bottom get cancelled out
that's a thing ?? @~@
swerriee
incheresting, I would never have gotten that 😭
oki lemme attempt to write this out again
oki got it! :D Thank you <3
have a great night :D
.close
Closed by @glass harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Snagging this channel to ask a more general version of the question I asked in #help-27 . When calculating an eigenvector, for example - for the matrx ([-7,-7],[-5,-5]), you end up with something like -7a -7b = 0. You can choose an eigenvector as (1,-1), and I get that - but why not (2,-2)? And is that equivalent? When you're doing calculations with that eigenvector, how does the scaling work?
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
🫠
@terse lotus Has your question been resolved?
Hi :D I would close both channels and start anew in a new one, it's a lot more likely to get a response in my experience
Closed by @terse lotus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with finding the increasing and decreasing intervals
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Hello
Hi
First calculate those points
When the function is going down
It's decreasing
When function going up It's increasing
Yes
Just state the regions in which these things are happening
That's it right?
What else is their to know
(+ inf, -7)?
Nope
You see
The function is decreasing even after that
From x belongs to - infinity to 0
It's decreasing
The interval is of x
Not y
Then from x = 0 to 8/3 it's increasing
Then from x=8/3 to infinty
It's decreasing again
You can do the same for the last question
Hope this helped
Ty
Would it be decreasing: (+inf, -7), (8/3, -inf) and increasing is (-7, 8/3)
@urban gust Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @urban gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
But if the x^2 - x case directly implied that x is an integer already, then what would the point have been of them telling you that x^n - x is also an integer?
@little pond Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @little pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Here’s what I have so far:
if $x^2 - x = k$, and k is an integer, then $x = \frac{1 \pm \sqrt{1 + 4k}}{2}$
That means that the fact that $x^n - x$ is an integer must imply that $1 + 4k$ is a perfect square, but that’s where I got stuck. How can I show that? I tried doing it out for n = 3 and n = 4, where I realised that the factorisation is $x(x-1)$(some other stuff), and since $x(x-1)$ is an integer, the rest of the stuff must be an integer too, but I wasn’t able to prove that - it’s definitely not true for n = 3 or n = 4, but I’m not sure how to deal with the n in the power.
Fear na bPónairí
I would recommend prove by contrapositive, if x is not an integer, then for all $n\ge 3$, $x^n-x$ is not integer
ManMan
@little pond Has your question been resolved?
But what about x^2 - x?
similarly, x^2-x is not integer either
@little pond Has your question been resolved?
I’ll give that a go after, but I wanna try to finish my first idea if possible
@little pond Has your question been resolved?
@little pond Has your question been resolved?
Thing is, since $x(x-1)$ is integer and $x(x-1)$(some other stuff) is integer, we conclude that (some other stuff) is rational. On the other hand, (some other stuff) = $x^{n-2} - x^{n-3} + ... \pm 1$. Substitute $\frac{1\pm\sqrt{1+4k}}{2}$ here and you'll get (something rational) + (something rational)$\sqrt{1+4k} \in \mathbb{Q}$, which implies that $\sqrt{1+4k} \in \mathbb{Q}$ for some integer $k$. Hence $\sqrt{1+4k} \in \mathbb{Z}$ and notably it's odd. Now it's not hard to see that $x$ is integer
EQUENOS
@little pond Has your question been resolved?
Is it formal enough to say “substitute and you’ll see…”? Because of course you can’t really sub it in because of the powers of n
You should prove that the coefficient of sqrt(1+4k) is not zero
How can I do that when there are possibly infinitely many terms?
And it didn’t specify that n is an integer so technically this might not prove it, so how do I get aroun that?
n is definitely an integer. Otherwise the statement isn't true
For example consider x = (1+sqrt(5))/2. Then x^2 - x = 1, and we can find some n >= 3 such that x^n - x is also an integer
Solve x^n - x = 4 relative to n. It yields n = ln(x + 4)/ln(x) ≈ 3.587
The number of terms is finite but yes, n is arbitrary. But that doesn't mean that the task is impossible
Oh, and actually I was mistaken and that long sum should've been
$$x^{n-2} + x^{n-3} + ... + 1$$
EQUENOS
Actually I think it's better to express it as $\frac{x^{n-1}-1}{x-1}$
EQUENOS
Good luck
So you’re saying if I sub my expression for x into here, I should be able to deduce that x is an integer? (Or in other words, 1 + 4n is a perfect square?)
Since the other part is also an integer?
Yes, but again, only if you prove that the coefficient of sqrt(1+4k) is not zero
It’s pretty late for me rn, so I’ll probably just try it tomorrow, but would you mind if I shoot you a DM if I have any problems? Just so I can close this channel
Yes, of course. Feel free to DM
@little pond Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @little pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im just stuck on how they got x=cot5y (this is the mark scheme)
oh wait no lol i got it
.close
Closed by @robust stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I have E[X^2] is there a way to find E[X^4] quickly?
without doing integrals all over again
Depends on the integral but in general I don’t think so
I mean
you could do the
Expectation version of the formula
[ \text{Var} (X^2) = E(X^2)^2 - E(X^4) ]
neon
and those are pretty simple to solve with an integral
if there is a shorter way to find E[X^4]
neon
do you know about this?
you can prove it pretty easily with integration by parts
ehh idk not really
I mean It's a probability course
it's fairly easy to prove
I don't think they'll ask for proofs about integrals
yeah alright
thanks 🙂
I don't think so
okay no problem then
this is useful to remember though
it will be of use to you here for instance
neon
wdym by "split"
x/4 = u
neon
do you understand this?
so that integral is just 4!
correct
,calc 4^4*4!
Result:
6144
there you go
ty
@coral fog Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @coral fog
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If i understood correct, f'(x) is the growth factor of a given point x when delta x goes towards 0, but at the same time is f'(x) the slope of the tangent?
f'(x) is the growth of the function f(x) at a given x. the tangent is the same thing
so what really is the difference then between a tangent and secant
there is no secant in a graph
secant is the line through two points, and when you move the second point really close to the first one it becomes the tangent is probably the best intuition
so a secant is basically something we can draw to help us find the slope of a tangent?
Yeah pretty much
well
Formally the derivative of a function is defined as the instantaneous rate of change
At a point
if you find the slope of the secant it gives you the average rate of change
and from that the idea is, but what if i want to know the rate of change at a given point
but if i tried to divide y_1-y_0 / (x_1 - x_0)
and i took some point
i would be dividing by 0 and thats not possible
so when the question asks "Find the momentary growth factor when x=2". They're really asking for what the slope of the tanget is when x=a, and we can draw a secant through 2 points to find the average rate of change by doing a = f(x2) - f(x1) / delta x
so the idea is we move the second point really close to the first point
Yes and no
you want the rate of change at x=2
if you took a second point f(a) really far away from the first point
youd get the average between the two points, but thats not the rate of change at the first point
So you take the limit as a gets really close to x
which is the derivative of x or the tangent
3Blue1Brown has an amazing video on what @shut night with a visualisation
https://youtu.be/9vKqVkMQHKk?si=-n-gaTfX9PUOkGwK
do check it out if you wish
What is an "instantaneous rate of change" when change happens across time?
Help fund future projects: https://www.patreon.com/3blue1brown
This video was supported in part by Art of Problem Solving: https://aops.com/3blue1brown
An equally valuable form of support is to simply share some of the videos.
Special thanks to these supporters: http://3b...
Ah alright, so to summarize a bit.
We can use the equation for f'(x) to find the rate of change at a given point x = a, when lim delta x -> 0. However, we can also find the rate of change of a secant by basically drawing it through 2 points in the graph and use delta y / delta x
I'll definitely check it out, thanks!
Yeah just remember the secant is the average rate of change between two points, and the tangent is the rate of change at a given point
Yeah alright, thank you so much! Looked really like they were the same in the book, but I'll watch the video to maybe make it easier by visualizing it 🙂
we concur on what we watch
3b1b is an amazing channel
But the idea is you take a secant and move the second point reallllyyyy close to the first one (the limit) and then two points super close to each other must have the slope of the given point!
I usually watch, the Chemistry Tutor as he also explains physics
Agreed. This legend literally made an open source programme (which a lot of other maths channels use as well) for creating his maths animations
Grant Sanderson is really god tier
Yeah he’s amazing as well
five awards
.close
Closed by @distant totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
'
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
2
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
when taking derivative , there is always one that does not change, (x-1)^2024
and there is one at the final 2024! but i can not find the middle one
did you use leibniz formula of derivation?
dont know what is that
f = g*h, all of which being functions
$f^{(n)}(x) = \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}g^{(k)}(x)h^{(n-k)}(x)$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
you should, it helps a lot
ok ty
with this formula, I find answer 0?
is it correct?
@opal vault ?
@fair thorn ?
<@&286206848099549185>
hai
.
guys, help please
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@glad folio
why tf are you pinging helpers
a. in someone else's channel
b. within 2 minutes of the last ping
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
I said g(x)= x-1
h(x)= x+1
and used the formula given
it givess 0
show how you used it, maybe?
.close
Closed by @rare atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
incorrect answer
why
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For question f are they orthonormal?
I found the dot product of the first vector and second = 0.000448
bad sign
Shouldn't we find if they are perpendicular?
yea they have to be an orthogonal set before they can be orthonormal for sure
The books says they are orthonormal, but I don't understand how
orthonormal means each vector has length 1 and is orthogonal to each other
If the dot product was close to 0 can we say that they are perpendicular?
no
for which one did you found 0.000448?
,w Dot[{0.921, 0.294, -0.254}, {-0.254, 0.951, 0.178}]
not orthogonal
close to 0 is not 0
Closed by @vapid seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with my homework?
this is my solution but im not 100% sure
also not sure with the derivatives
@mossy nest Has your question been resolved?
@mossy nest Has your question been resolved?
@mossy nest Has your question been resolved?
@mossy nest Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@mossy nest Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm supposed to find the derivative of this parametric equation, and I did. (sin(t)(2cos(t)-1))/(cos(t)-cos(2t))
But I'm supposed to simplify it further using the double angle identities. The problem is, when I do, I get left with a really ugly expression, and my prof said it's supposed to look "better"?
I simplified it to (sin(t)(2cos(t)-1))/((-2cos(t)-1)(cos(t)-1))
let me actually put this into neat formatting because it's unreadable inline
$\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{-2\sin(t) + 2\sin(2t)}{2\cos(t) - 2\cos(2t)}$
knief
right and I did lol but this isn't neat
is this your answer
he said that there's a way to simplify it further
and what have you tried for that
if it helps, think of cos(t) as x
or u
u - 2u^2 + 1
we're not supposed to use half angle identity so I can't make it cot(3t/2)
i see no other way to simplify it
how did he want it then?
that's the issue, he didn't really specify lol. We're supposed to take the limit for when t approaches 0, but like
im not sure how to take the limit of it if it weren't in this quotient form... so i guess this is the best i can do lol
nvm, sorry for wasting your time lol
all good
Closed by @merry bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why does the line here must be a homogenous equation
As opposed to what?
just that, like why cant the line be (x,y) vector here why does it have to be a homogenous equation
so you mean c=0?
no like ax+by+c=0
@royal sky Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
!15mins
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Yeah
yep!
Closed by @final anvil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Someone please explain this statement in the solution
which book is it? i really like these questions
u live in India
suppose that g is not 1-to-1, that there exist natural a, b such that g(a) = g(b)
then f(g(a)) = f(g(b)) so that would imply that h(n) = n is also not 1-to-1
thankss
f must be surjective also, shouldn't be too hard to see what happens if f is not surjective
Oooooh got it
Thanks
where u live
no worries!
.close
Closed by @forest plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i livw in india too
F is surjective because g is surjective correct?
g doesn't actually need to be surjective
.reopen
✅
wait
yeah you could have f(x) = tan(x) but g(x) = x for -pi/2 < x < pi/2
for instance
writing rmo tomorrow?
This ones a polynomial tho
Ya
it doesn't matter
we just need to find what conditions $f \circ g$ being 1-to-1 imposes on $f, g$
south's secret twin brother
also tan x is not a polynomial but
ooh noice which grade
and this is abstract I know
ya
message me in dm i dont want to clutter this chat
since f o g of n = n is injective, g(n) is also injective, but how do we know that f is onto?
well if f is not onto, then there must be some k such that f(n) = k has no solutions
so n can be anything, and g(n) can be anything, so we can just replace $n \mapsto g(n)$
south's secret twin brother
right got it
and since g(n) = f(n) + 2, that means that f is also injective and g is also surjective correct?
ok final question
what does it mean that f and g are inverse of each other
nvm got that too. becuase f returns the preimage of n on g right?
thanks
.close
Closed by @forest plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i know the answer but dunno how to solve 😔
<@&286206848099549185>
nobody replies?
ig imma close
.close
Closed by @cedar spindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
hey
do you still need help
@cedar spindle
so you can write it as 5x = 4y
and then you can solve it via substitution
x = 4y/5
4y/5 + y = 54
9y/5 = 54
9y = 260
y = 260/9
and then you can solve for x
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If you’re dividing 1/2x^2 by 1/2x, wouldn’t it be 1/4x instead of x? Watching a tutorial and apparently it’s x - 12, not 1/4x - 12
Two ships leave from the same port. One ship travels on a bearing of 157° at 20 knots. The second ship travels on a bearing of 247° at 35 knots. (1 knot is a speed of 1 nautical mile per hour).
a. How far apart are the ships after 8 hours?
b. Calculate the bearing of the second ship from the first?
I cant answer question b
<@&286206848099549185>
! occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
@broken stone Has your question been resolved?
^
how did 5x become 6x on the second line?
oh nvm im blind
so ur asking what happens if you divide x^2/2 by x/2? or 1/2*x^2 by 1/2**x
Id guess the 2nd, I’m dividing everything in the 2nd line (except 0) by the GCF, which is 1/2x
Yes and u did it correctly, I don't see the problem here
My original answer was 1/4x - 3, I just corrected it according to a video guide
okay so (1/2)*x^2 divided by (1/2)x is just x
Its pretty clear to see
this is mad confusing, let me work it out and ill send a pic
Subbed in 2 for x and see it now, just saw dividing half by a half and thought “half of half is a 4th”
@broken stone Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im so lost here
I got it wrong
for 6b
I used the addition formula
to get 5 root 3/2 cos x - 5/2 sinx = 4/5 sinx
and then just solve from there
Idk why its wrong
😭
Can you show us your work?
solve cos(x-30) further
yo mb didint notice u opened it
but anyways
u opened it wrong
$\cos(u-v) = \cos(u)\cos(v) + \sin(u)\sin(v)$
knief
no because sin (-30) returns -1/2
wait what
brother
^
the audacity lol
you’re welcome
.close
Closed by @lusty cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is this wrong
huh (-2, oo) should be enough tho
i think you can combine your answers for the increasing part
yeah i think im a bit slow
i didnt even notice i could combine them 😭 thank u guys
.close
Closed by @faint otter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If xy is a perfect square
and yz is a perfect square
prove that xz is a perfect square
So what i figured
is let xy = i^2
yz = j^2
therefore xy^2z = i^2j^2
and xz = i^2*j^2/y^2
so I have to prove that i * j /y is an integer
so if y is a prime number
than this is obvious
however if y is a composite number, how do i go about proving this?
yo
Since the square root of any natural number that is not a perfect square is irrational, xz must be a perfect square here
Oh i get it
(Assuming x and y are natural numbers?)
ya and xz isnt a fraction
its an integer
yes
x y and z are
natural numbers
not integers
natural numbers
ya
aight thanks
.close
Closed by @iron blaze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain what is going on in this problem lol
This section is taking forever and the solutions given skip tons of steps
Specifically the part where it says "From the volume equation. h = ..."
Why is there a 4 in the numerator all of the sudden? don't I plug r and V into h to find h?
Here's the full problem:
I've already spent way more time on this than I can afford so I need to move on
@copper fossil Has your question been resolved?
C=2pi r h + 2pi r^2
V=pi r^2 h + 2/3 pi r^3
V/(pi r^2)=h+2/3 r, h=V/(pi r^2) - 2r/3)
C=2pi r[V/(pi r^2) - 2r/3]+2pi r^2 = 2V/r - 4/3 pi r^2 +2pi r^2 = 2V/r +8/3 pi r^2
dC/dr=-2V/r^2+16/3 pi r =0
v/r^2= 8/3 pi r V=8/3 pi r^3, then r=...
subbing it into the h equation
h=V/pi * 1/(3V/8pi)^2/3 -...
=V/pi * (8pi/3V)^2/3 -... 8^(2/3)=4, is where the 4 is coming from
just follow the calculations
So I don't plug V = 8/3* pi * r^3 into h?
no youre plugging r=(3V/8pi)^1/3 into h
Is V not plugged in because the problem said volume is fixed?
yeah, since we know V is a fixed value it just makes it easier to work with than r
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
r and h are our only changing things
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
oops
sry lol
nah i was just bad timing lol
I was wondering if I used the right formula for this
i used the 1-PropZtest formula for this
<@&286206848099549185>
yes that would be good
looks correct to me
okay thank you
if i’m wrong im sorry; it’s been a bit since i’ve done statistics but the first formula is right and im assuming you used a stats list for the second portion
yep
looks like what i would do
do you know if it is correct? if so; you did it correctly
i don’t have access to a calculator rn
the answer choices were 0.1835 0.1822 0.1935 and 0.1922
the professor said to choose the closest answer
so 0.1935 is what I chose
well you got a direct answer and your formulae are correct
Closed by @boreal surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given triangle ABC inscribed in (O). Any circle through B, C intersects AC, AB times as at E, F. Prove that AO is perpendicular to EF
help me pls
@teal umbra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im unsure what to do for this. why would i break it up into 30 sets based on the odds?
this is a pigeonhole principle proof, but i dont really know where to start
i thought of the subset of primes or something but idk if that helps
and im guessing you cant really use that anyway
@strange mortar Has your question been resolved?
okk
so i tried searching up on this question
and i think i get it
so as the hint says you indeed have 30 odd numbers
but, the even numbers are also just odd numbers multiplied by a power of 2
say we have 5
and another even number 20
but then 20 is 2^2 * 5
and the even number which divides 5 must obviously be greater than 5
not necessarily
example?
like take a prime factorization of an even number
and remove ALL the 2 powers
so 4 = 2^2 * 1
so if you have an even number
you can remove all the two powers and map it to an odd number
which will divide the even number
im guessing ur reading off the same thing im seeing
but i just dont know what the number pairing hint means
or i meant the 30 sets thing
so say you take a set containing all the 30 odd numbers
then no matter what single even number you take
youll have at least one odd number mapping to it
say we take 52
which is 2^2 * 13
but then we already have 13 in our set
Closed by @strange mortar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do we solve this? This chosen answer is wrong btw
we would like to apply the intermediate value theorem
Yes
D can't be the answer bc the product would have to be negative to have a solution in the interval?
we can see that all of the solution choices involve 0, so we need to find a function which, given this information, is guaranteed to equal 0 in this interval
Such as?
well let's consider the statement of the intermediate value theorem
can we find a function, using the given information, so that 0 is between f(a) and f(b)?
Any function?
well we would like for it to be related to f(x) and g(x)
using information from the problem statement
Sorry cant think of anything
what information are we given in the original problem statement, about f(x) and g(x)?
both continuous on the interval could polynomials I think
let's not assume they're any particular class of funciton
is there anything else that we are explicitly given about them?
f(a)>g(a)
could we rearrange that inequality so that one side is 0?
f(b)<g(b)
yes. so could we do this with both inequalities
f(a)-g(a)>0
f(b)-g(b)<0
yes. can we combine those two inequalities now?
How?
... < 0 < ...
Oh okay
f(b)-g(b)<0<f(a)-g(a)
Idk the only way I've used ivt was when both a graph and points were given
the intermediate value theorem says, that if we have some function $h(x)$ which is continuous on $[a,b]$, and we have a function value $y_0$ where either $h(a) < y_0 < h(b)$ or $h(b) < y_0 < h(a)$, we are guaranteed an input value $c$ in the interval $(a,b)$ such that $h(c) = y_0$
cloud
the y_0 we are interested in this case is 0
so do we have any functions $h(x)$ where we have $h(a) < 0 < h(b)$ or $h(b) < 0 < h(a)$?
cloud
(thinking about the inequality we just made)
@jolly vale Has your question been resolved?
I'm not sure I understand what you are talking about, sorry got busy
remember that sums, differences, products etc of functions are also functions
we would like to use this inequality
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yeah h(a)and h(b)
f(a) - g(a) > 0 and f(b) - g(b) < 0
now if you let h(x) = f(x) - g(x), what can you conclude
That's the answer is c cuz f(x)=g(x) when x=0
yeah
IVT implies that f(x) - g(x) = 0 has at least one sol
cause f(x) - g(x) is continuous
Thanks
cool no worries
.close
Closed by @jolly vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
as helpers we do our best to explain
I've definitely been in situations where I wasn't explaining very well
also I see you've done the work above
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi guys may I know how to solve this question?
what does diagram 13.1 look like
no its good
TS and PQ are not the same no?
uh ignore what i drew
i realised that after i took the picture
🗿
hmm then i guess heron's formula is your best bet
really?
you can find TQ and TS by using papa pythagoras
its not 90 degrees though
is it not?
doesnt seem like it
T is vertically above P though
classic tm speed
or whatever isp u using lol
tm?
telekom malaysia
nah lol im thinking
this is the one time i got confused in ambigious
usually is i can imagine a isosceles triangle
i used to just randomly draw it lol
ye
wait nvm that doesnt work lol
oh i got it maybe
you gotta project a line down to PS such that Q'S' is the same as QS
ye only PQ and QS has to be the same
@sweet trout Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sweet trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find the sum of two vectorial spaces? Exercise number 3. The vector that generates W are v1(1,1,0,0); v2(-2,0,1,-1)
Posso scriverti in italiano?
I found the intersection of the two spaces by a system of the Cartesian equations of the two vector spaces
Va bene
Anzi molto meglio
Ok, l'intersezione te la ottieni come intersezione delle equazioni cartesiane dei sottospazi
L'altro spazio mi pare che si ottenga (ho fatto geometria 1 sei anni fa, quindi verifica) come span dei vettori che generano i due spazi
Si però essendo una base devo rimuovere i vettori che possono essere scritti come combinazione lineare
Questo è vero
Applicando il teorema della dimensione di uno spazio vettoriale la dim di U+W deve per forza essere 3
Quindi ho pensato di togliere uno dei vettori che mi dava lintersezione se sommato
Che sicuramente può essere una soluzione ma cercavo qualcosa di più generale
Mi sa che ti tocca fare questo oppure provare quello che dicevo tu. Se metti i 4 vettori assieme, sei sicuro che i due vettori di U (o di V se parti da V) stanno nella base di U+V
Bisogna vedere quale degli altri due che rimangono è indipendente o meno con gli altri
Conviene procedere con un sistema a questo punto riscrivo tutti e quattro i vettori e trovo i parametri liberi che generano lo spazio U+W
Anche questo si può fare
Brutta situazione però
Ponendoli a sistema mi da che nessuno è linearmente indipendente
Sia ad occhio sia utilizzando Sympy
Però per il teorema sulla dimensione deve essere per forza 3 e quindi uno va scritto come combinazione lineare per forza
Io concluderei togliendo uno dei vettori che sommati mi da il vettore base di U intersecato W a questo punto essendo la somma definita seguendo il teorema vettori di U vettori W - vettori dell Intersezione
Io ho fatto questo
Ho messo riga per riga i vettori e poi ho ridotto per riga la matrice. Siccome l'ultima riga è nulla, allora il quarto è c.l. degli altri 3
Questo funziona per le regole della c.l.: quando hai uno spazio che è generato da una combinazione lineare di vettori, tu puoi cambiare uno dei vettori con lo stesso vettore a cui sommi o sottrai una combinazione lineare dei rimanenti
@crisp night Has your question been resolved?
Corretto
Grazie mille
Il risultato è analogo a quello che ho trovato io
Questo metodo è molto molto più generale grazie mille
.close
Closed by @crisp night
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Show that B=5^n×12−12^n×5 can be divide by 7.
can you help me resolve this with congruence ?
oh that is just congruent to 5^n * 5 - 5^n * 5
12 = 5 (mod 7)
can you explain a little more please i dont really understand
Basic congruence introduction in modular arithmetic. We will go over 3 ways to interpret a ≡ b (mod n), and you will see this in a number theory or a discrete math class. Learn how to solve congruence, subscribe to @blackpenredpen
💪 Support this channel, https://www.patreon.com/blackpenredpen
You can subtract 7 from 12
you can just replace the 12 with 5 wherever 12 appears
just because 12 = 1*7 + 5 ?
yes
so in every congruence expression you can just simplify numbers with no others impacts on other ?
yeah
ok i didnt know that thanks 👍
and so 5^n5-5^n5 is just 0 so ≡ 0 ?
here's another example
yes
Closed by @burnt fjord
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
hey excuse me i dont understand this reply in the link you gave me
why 90x is equivalent to 15x
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find all integers n such that x^3+y^3+z^3-3xyz=n has a positive integer solution (x,y,z)
so like if you factor tou can get
(x+y+z)(x^2+y^2+z^2-xy-xz-yz)=n
but idk what next
ig n is positive
idk what next
wait gold on
doesent this like make no sense
x^3+y^3+z^3-3xyz has like infinite ranges
yeah but im pretty sure there is infinite n
yeah, there 100% is
Closed by @pearl fog
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I type
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Look this is the math problem if someone knows please help me
I did the basic stuff already but don't know what's next
remember its the 45 45 90 triangle
the red is the radius of the large circle
the green is the radius of the small circle
what should the length of the side be?
so i use pythagorem theorem to find the hypothenius?
once i have the answer for the hypothenius what should I do next?
if we use s for the side of the square
we know that s^2 + s^2 = 20^2
we also know that s = 10 + x
which means that (10+x)^2 + (10+x)^2 = 20^2
now you can expand and then solve for x
would it be 10√2 − 10?
Correct
aah thank you very much
@left egret Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @left egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i’m really confused about how an isolating point could be continuous, mainly the difference of continuity of function and point
so is my drawing of understanding p, E and f(x) correct, according to the statement?
what do the arcs represent?
upper arc represents the function f(x), lower arc represents the domain
you've draw p somewhere floating in midair, why?
p is a point of the domain E
it should be sitting on the horizontal axis
yes, sorry it means the x-coordinate of that point
is p isolated in your drawing?
well im not sure which set you consider f(p) to be part of
perhaps of the graph
then you've drawn (p, f(p)) as an isolated point of the graph of f
yes but p itself isn't isolated in E
it is most definitely not in your picture
so what will a correctly depicted graph looks like
every point of Z as a subset of R is isolated
try drawing a function defined on Z
then see if its continuous
is it a must that it is only defined on Z?
i guess it isnt made explicit in what you sent
f should be a function E -> some other set
presumably R
f : E -> R
so having an intuitive thought on Z only tho
Z is just a convenient example where every point is isolated
feel free to use other sets
,, (-\infty, -1) \union \set 0 \union (1, \infty)
here again every point is isolated
I still don't get how it can be continuous tho, what will be the visulization of the graph, the continuity at a limit point statement is only true if it is a limit point?
its just requiring the limit to equal the value of the function
neighbourhoods of an isolated point eventually only contain the isolated point itself
so you are taking the limit over a single point
so are we using the epsilon delta definition here
sure why not
$L$ is a limit of $f$ at $x$ if for all $\epsilon > 0$, there exists $\delta > 0$ such that if $\abs {x - a} < \delta$ then $\abs {f(x) - L} < \epsilon$
if $p$ is an isolated point of $E$, then there exists $\eta > 0$ such that $\set {x \where \abs {x - p} < \eta} = \set p$
Ohh wait, so as we have the value of f(x) defined here as p, any $\epsilon > 0$ will be automatically true for this statement
ManMan
then taking $\delta = \eta$, you yield $\abs {x - p} < \eta$ if and only if $x = p$, whence $\abs {f(p) - f(p)} < \epsilon$ holds trivially for all $\epsilon > 0$
wait, lemme digest
yeh, it is challenging but interesting
through out those definitions, a lot of misconceptions in calculus are cleaned
im sure you can get a nice picture of this
Closed by @keen plinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
here is a picture btw
0 on the x-axis is isolated
so whatever point you put as the blue one, the function will be continuous
I was confused about HOW it looks so discontinuous, but then realise that the requirement of continuity in the statement only holds for domain E, so it is still continuous in the domain E
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a couple decide to start having children and keep having children until they have the same number of boys and girls. how many children do they expect to have?
Is this real
yes
lol
yeah like the prob of either child is 50/50
we're trying to find the expected number of children
i think it's fairly obvious?
2?
so like the expected number of coin flips if we want to stop at an equal number of heads and tails with a fair coin
n
actually yeah interesting question
why'd you say 2? the value is 2 if you have one boy and one girl or one girl and one boy. that happens with probability 1/4 each so 1/2 total
so it's 2 only 1/2 of the time
I think it's 3 man
some power of two no doubt
Okay lile
define X_n = difference between #boys - #girls
then X_n is a simple symmetric random walk starting at 0
define T = inf{n >= 1 s.t. X_n = 0}
we want to compute E(T)
it isn't too hard to show E(T) is infinite
LY what year of undergrad ru in
so tell that couple to better start getting busy!
2nd
first of all i don't really understand this my bad
if u were wondering abt the courses i've done/doing,
- numbers&sets (introductory maths course), differential equations, vectors&matrices, groups, vector calculus, dynamics&relativity, probability, analysis, groups rings & modules
- analysis&topology, markov chains, quantum mechanics, linear algebra, methods, galois theory & prob&measure (unofficially)
yeah probability is weird
Well if u think abt it
wow i ran a simulation with 1000 trials and it gave me 25k as the answer
a lot larger than i thought
i thought it'd be between 2 and 6 dang
💀💀💀
yeah basically the answer is infinity, so if you keep running more and more trials, you should find that the answer just keeps going up and up

