#help-26
1 messages · Page 159 of 1
wait why though
physics trick: you can realize that you are integrating an odd function over an even Interval
is that a rule i should know?
whats an odd function?
but its good actually finding the indefinite integral of this function
a function such that f(-x)=-f(x)
you should know that sinx is odd
and cosx is even
an even function has the property: f(-x)=f(x)
sin(-x)cos(-x) = -sin(x)cos(x)
and so how does it help me knowing if the function is even or odd?
because of the property tobi mentioned
symmetries in functions help a lot, whenever you want to evaluate an Integral, also in the complex plain which I jut realized a couple of days ago (even if you only want to find on Integral on the real axis)
for example sin(x) from -pi to pi
the positive part cancels with the negative part here
I see
tobi
for all a
a being a real number
and for even functions
$\int_{-a}^a f(x) dx = 2 \int_{0}^a f(x) dx$
tobi
wait
so are you saying the problem states an odd function
and that the answer is just automatically 0?
because it is integrated from -a to +a and a is pi here
yes
as an erxercise, maybe convice yourself by finding the indefinite integral of this function and plugging in the values
$\int_{-a}^a f(x) dx = F(a) - F(-a)$
tobi
this is true for every continues function
do you have an idea how to integrate
could you explain this one a bit more please
$\int sin(x) cos(x) dx$
tobi
I feel like I definitely learned this in calc 1 and wrote it down
but I cant find it
let f(x) be an even function
just did the prove for this
on the first step I split the Integral in 2 parts
then I let v = -x in the first Integral, by that we have f(-v) in the Integral and we get a negative sign in the front from the dx
we know that f(-v) = f(v) because we assumed f to be an even function
we also know that we can split the upper and lower bounds with the cost of a negative sign
still here by the way, just trying to piece all of this together
sure tell me if anything is unclear
or maybe an example of an even function, the cosine function, because we know that these marked areas have the same value, we just need to calculate the Integral from 0 to one of the lines to have enough information
this is just proving this for any even function, but its the same idea
yeah a picture definitely helps
I get that now
since the two sides are equal
its the same idea here, just that both sides cancel there
could you give me an example and let me determine if a function is odd or even?
I see that now thats so cool
?
e^x
odd?
I mean do you know this function
tobi
so is sinh(x) the same as sin(x)?
no
whats the difference?
sine and cosine give the coordinates of the unit circle
Yes
sinh and cosh give the coordinates of a hyperbola
oh
hyperbolic sine function
what class is that usually taught in?
oh I dont know if you learn about this in school, im a physics major
I did not know about these functions in school
makes sense ive never seen it before
but it does not matter if you only want to find out if a function is even or odd
you could check that with any function so I wanted to use something you probably have not seen before
ohhhh
so how would I go about determining if its odd or even?
just like a starting point
when do we consider a function odd? when do we consider it even?
odd if f(-x)=-f(x) and even if f(x)=f(-x) like you said right?
yeah! correct nice
so you have to check what you stated
$sinh(x) := \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2}$
tobi
so can I check by just making x whatever I want?
if you want to check if sinh(x) is even you want to check if sinh(x) = sinh(-x) if you want to check if its odd check if sinh(-x) = -sinh(x)
so where do I start here Im confused...
you want to check if you can write sinh(-x) as -sinh(x)
this has to be true if sinh(x) is an odd function
if a function is odd it has to be true that f(-x) = -f(x)
you know how sinh(x) is defined
yes
so you can check what sinh(-x) is equal to
((e^-x)-(e^x))/2 ?
yeah
now if sinh is an even function
this should be the same as sinh(x)
is this the case here?
or does sinh(-x) = sinh(x) ?
$sinh(-x) = \frac{e^{-x} - e^{x}}{2}$
tobi
$sinh(x) := \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2}$
tobi
yeah sinh(x) is not an even function
wait what
maybe check if sinh(-x) = -sinh(x)
I thought we were checking if it was odd
wait but I thought this rule was for checking odds
yeah we showed it is not even, so lets check if it is odd
tobi
most functions are not even and not odd!
if it works for you I can also try explaining this via voice chat
so this concept was only helpful in my case because I just so happened to have a function that was even or odd?
nono sorry
yes, but this is often the case for elementary functions
np
ok so let me get this straight
we proved that it wasnt even because f(x) !=f(-x)
how do we check if f(-x) == -f(x)?
$\sinh(-x) = \frac{e^{-x} - e^{x}}{2} = - \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2} = -\sinh(x)$
tobi
doesnt that prove that its odd then?
you said the top wasn't equal, but it only differs, by a -1
wait but it isnt
ahahahahahaha this is too much
but im getting it
slowly but surely
do you see that the middle part is the same?
if you distribute the negative sign
or -1
no its not the same?
wait no it is
I do see that
it would be -e^x adding e^-x
which is the same as the left side
nice and then we may recognize the definition of sinh(x)
so what you have to check for an odd function is just if f(-x) = - f(x) and for an even function if f(x) = f(-x)
maybe lets do an easier example
$f(x) = x$
tobi
is this function odd or even or nothing of these 2?
how would you prove this? lets say I disagree
because f(-x) = -x and -f(x) = -x
and that fulfills the requirement for an odd function
tobi
odd
yeah nice
ok I understand now
$f(x) = x^{101}$
tobi
odd?
yeah i see that
ok but going back to my original question
from way back before
of pi to -pi (sinxcosx) dx
yeah
I use the sin2x =2sinx cosx rule
(-pi to pi)*
you could yeah
and I get (sin(2x)/2)= sinxcosx
and I can just get rid of sinxcosx because they are the same
yes works so far
I determine that the function is odd because there is only a sine right
and that proves that the answer is 0
or am I getting ahead of myself
well yes it works like this, but you could have used the symmetry argument from the start, sine is odd, cosine is even and odd * even = odd
but now that you have already used this overpowered tool you can also find the Integral of the function
thats exactly what odd * even is
or where it comes from
okay
$\int \sin(x) \cos(x) dx = \int \frac{1}{2} \sin(2x)dx$
tobi
so first of all we can use the linearity of the Integral
with that I mean
$\int c f(x) dx = c \int f(x) dx$
tobi
oh I havent found F(x) yet right
yeah thats what I was talking about
yes
1/4 actually my bad
and am left with (-cos(2x))/4 +C
yeah
and then i can just leave my answer as the written out version of F(a)-F(b)
which from this new thing I learned today I already know is 0
yeah?
yeah plug in pi and -pi and the two terms cancel, because cosine is an even function
F(pi) - F(-pi) = F(pi) - F(pi) = 0
wow i love math when everything works out and nothing goes wrong
saved mathematics once again, we did not prove 1=0 xD
this was a great learning experience with you
yeah its cool
no problem, I wish you the best!
Closed by @twin walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
maybe try forming a basis of V that consists of a basis of ker T and try to do something with these vectors
are we assuming those vector spaces finite dimensional?
I think they have to because otherwise the span can never fully be W or V
yes, they have to. I am giving hint by posing more question
seemed more like an error in the question itself
they are yeah
only finite dimentional vector spaces in this course, thats why they didnt specify
ah good
that consists of a basis of ker T
what do you mean here?
you don't need to consider the kernel
think about the basis of W, take the preimage, and work from there
whats a preimage?
inverse mapping if that makes sense
uh not really sorry
the preimage of a subset B of W is ${v\in V : Tv\in B}$
hahahahahahahaha from England
oh so the vectors that map to the items in the subset
yes, don't overthink it.
Let ${w_1, \dots, w_m}\subset W$ be the basis of $W$
hahahahahahahaha from England
T is surjective
what else
read the assumption on T
oh they span V
yes
does this prove they ker(T) = {0}?
It seems that you only showed T(0)=0
yeah but i started from the base of the image
hmm ig i guess i could by contrdiction
To show ker(T)=0, you have to start with an arbitrary v, such that Tv = 0, and show v=0.
assume ker is not 0
oh yeah and that would work similarly
right?
yes
is this right?
seems right to me
sibber
yes
sibber
i dont remember any other theorems
=*
just to be clear, we are assuming n > 1?
If n=1 then we can choose A = 1 and for all B we have B^t = B. So T(B)=2B which is injective...
that's why I asked
Ok, can you show $B\mapsto B^t + B$ is not injective
hahahahahahahaha from England
it means a mapping that takes B to B^t + B
ah
Alternatively, I can say let f(B)=B^t + B, show that f is not injective
ok
we can take any non symmetrical B, then both B and B^t would map to the same thing
yes, using this you can show T is not injective
Say we have two functions, $f, g: X\to X$. If $g$ is bijective and $f$ is not injective, what can you say about $f\circ g$?
hahahahahahahaha from England
I should ask, is it injective?
the proof should be simple isn't it
Now, let $f:B\mapsto B^t + B$ and $g:B\mapsto A^tB$
hahahahahahahaha from England
if we take 2 x's that map to the same thing in f,
and we give it to fg
oh wait no
we can take g-1(x)
and give those to fg and they would map to the same thing right?
yeah
yes, and the preimages of the x's are distinct
yeah
that's all you need to conclude fg is not injective
right
sibber
or equivalently A^t is invertible
Closed by @celest quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@honest osprey Has your question been resolved?
1
@honest osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @honest osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do this
does that mean the cylinder is on its side or smth?
@fiery sigil Has your question been resolved?
idk
@fiery sigil Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@fiery sigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you do this?
i dont know where to begin
what's the link between (x,y) and polar coordinates?
x = ?
y = ?
my teacher showed us Ay = |A|sin(theta)
and Ax = |A|cos(theta)
not sure if thats what were doing here though
not sure what A is here
it's just a point right
instead of writing $A = (A_x, A_y)$, we just write $A = (x,y)$
rafilou2003
ok
oh
so y = rsin(theta)
x = rcos(theta)
and the rest should be straight forward
makes sense but if y =3x-2?
x = -y-2) / 3
nono don't manipulate the equation yet
you know what x and y are equal to
yee
so just swap "x", 'y' by their values
what do you mean
yea
so
but what are the values here
what if I told you
that y is this value
and x is this value
wdym?
3x-2
the value of y is "rsin(theta)"
uh huh
nowhere, just keep it
ok so y = rsin(theta) 3x - 2
i know but thats what ur basically aying to dp
rsin(theta) = 3x-2
i keep forgetting were doing algebra
so you can replace x by its value
oh
o leme try
so
rsin(theta) = 3rcos(theta) -2
so the answer is b?
wait nevermind idk how to solve
ok now what
alright so
you see that the answer you want
is of the form
wait im right it is answer n
"r = ..."
so you birng cos to the left side
we put everything in r on the left side
OH IM SMART
lol
Closed by @minor compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im trying to figure this out but the solution doesnt make any sense to me. Where have they pulled the 35 from in the "61.4-35=26.4157"? My notes to follow in the next post
what do you have to find?
THe heading he was on walking from vertex C back to A
okay so u gotta find x?
And I have that at 333.6
but I dont understand teh solutions theyre giving me
WHere does the 35 come from?
And what am I doing wrong to get 181 degrees in the triangle?
im in a class rn, ill need to see the question properly
hence to find the angle made by the bearing you subtract 360 degrees from it
thanks
wait no
Im slightly concerned the set up is bad because when I add up the interior angles I get 181
@snow mantle Has your question been resolved?
@snow mantle Has your question been resolved?
it is
but
ive never come across such word problems
ofc it is if youre getting 181
there is an error
i just cant see through it
Yeah but Im not sure thats my fault or theirs
Sin(75)/5.5=Sin(C)/5=Sin(A)/4 gives me the angles, when I run through sin-1 of
A = 61.4, B = 75, and C = 43.6 which when added up gives me 181.
does this make sense for the 35
parallel lines angles thing
if youre getting 181 you mightve just rounded at an earlier stage
if you use a more accurate value than 5.5 for calculating the bearing you get a different answer
I think my notes are the same as yours up until the blue writing. I dont think Im rounding anywhere.
youre rounding for calculating 61.4
since 5.5 isnt the exact answer
instead of 5.5 if you used the expression sqrt(41-40*cos(75)) the angles will add up to 180
Ahhhh, yeah let me try that. let me finish up what I moved on to
and then Ill rework this
Ok, yes on the rounding
Though the rounding they give, is the same as mine
yeah and that will result in you getting angles which sum to 181 degrees
theres nothing wrong with that
since the question never mentions triangles, that was never a constraint
This is a trig mini module I have to get done this summer
And the 35 makes sense too now looking at it but I cant articulate it
the 35 is like working the other way around from 0/360, where as Im working fro the 3rd vertex, and so the 35 seems to appear out of nowhere?
yeah its just because u drew it differently
Ok
Ill have to stare at the 35 though for a while to see hwere its coming from
O
its because the 215-180=35
?
does it not make sense from this?
I see the 75+70+35 = 180
the 35 is the bearing of that black line
i initially just added it because figured itd be useful later
np, yeah it should click if u just ponder on it a bit/let it simmer in ur head for a while
returning to it later or smthn maybe
@snow mantle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @snow mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I just learnt about row vectors and row space
This whole time I've been able to easily interpret results from linear algebra by thikning about the column vectors and their span (the column space)
I am now wondering what the row vectors represent
What I mean by this, is like I interpret column vectors as where ihat, jhat, ... land after some transformation, and I am able to understand this transformation by considering the column space.
With row vectors though I don't know how to begin to interpret what it means.
@wintry urchin Has your question been resolved?
@wintry urchin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
question b
Take the augmented matrix and row reduce it
You should then see how the different values of alpha relate to the situation of how many solutions there are
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
What now?:
try to reduce it fully (ie you are able to divide by anything including alpha)
for now
and try and get down to the 4x4 identity matrix in the first 4 columns
so make everything alpha?
as in fully row reduce it (allowing for divisibility by say alpha, ie having a 1/alpha somewhere)
you should get a 4x4 identity matrix and then a bunch of terms involving alpha in the 5th column
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I express sin3x + cos1.5x with a single trig identity? I need to prove that this function is periodic.
I tried expressing it as:
2sin1.5xcos1.5x + cos1.5x = 2cos1.5x(sin(1.5x) + 1/2)
wdym with a single trig identity?
proving the function is periodic doesn't need much rewriting I believe
The sum of two "similar" periodic functions is periodic, this is a general fact.
I mean, if I can express it as sin(some angle) or cos(some angle) this would immediately prove that it's periodic
I've done similar problems like this before
I need to prove it @neon iron (this sounds so mean lmao I'm sorry)
umm no
so what do we do
just know that you're adding two periodic functions together
Yeah but the exercise asks me to prove it somehow.
and they have VERY similar periods
they do
we just have to find the period then
2pi/3
the other one 4pi/3
you get back to where you started
yeah
and here if you move by 4pi/3
you get back to where you started on that term
maybe
you can find a multiple of both
yeah
so it 'contains' the period of the former
that BOTH make them go back to where they started
exactly
so the period is ... 4pi/3?
yep
at least 4pi/3 is one of the periods
to check this, just compute f(x + 4pi/3)
if you get f(x)
then you win
ok
can we pls try another one now
like for example this one:
sin6.7x + tg8.9x
so for the first one the period is 20pi/67
since the period of one englobed the period of the second
yeah
for tg we get a period of 10pi/89
this is where the problems start for us ... lol
ok so
now we need to find a period
that englobes BOTH of those
meaning a multiple of 20pi/67
that is also a multiple of 10pi/89
yeah
I saw online people finding the LCM but how do they do that? we're literally dealing with fractions
exactly, if there is a denominator, just pick the gcd for the denominator
since 67 and 89 are coprime
the denominator of the period we're looking for
is gonna be 1
then
we just pick the LCM
of the numerators
20 and 10
it's 20
so 20pi
it's easy to check that 20pi is a multiple of 20pi/67
and it's also a multiple of 10pi/89
ok let's test it with the graph ig
let's... not
the pattern repeats after a huge amount of time
and the graph is unreadable because tangent flies off to infinity every so often
this graph will come to me in my nightmares ...
forget about what I suggested before
anyways if you go about a general way
say you have $f(x)$ of periodicity $\frac {p_1}{q_1}\pi$
rafilou2003
and $g(x)$ of periodicity $\frac {p_2}{q_2}\pi$
rafilou2003
then their sum or product is gonna be periodic
ok
so the lcm of the numerators divided by the gcm of denominators?
exactly
this is ALWAYS gonna be a period
*pi
ok
I will make a note so that I don't forget
and the same approach goes here right? sin1.2x + sin3.4x + sin4.5x
yeah makes sense
definitely you can add any finite amount of periodic functions
BUT the period of each
always has to look like
Let me add one more thing, the function is gonna be periodic, but in general, you cannot find the smallest positive period.
$\frac pq \pi$
rafilou2003
and the LCM method is not reliable
we don't always get on the smallest period
not any other that's reliable 100% of the time
like a small example like
I see, so unless there is some obvious pattern we can't really tell
or simpler sin(x) + (-sin(x))
the second funciton also has period pi
let's not deal with period "0"
so both functions have period pi and yet their sum is of a smaller period
I just saw once how a guy used a similar approach
it was in stack overflow, unfortunately cannot find it rn((
but he used it to express everything with one identity only
that immediately proves the periodicity
yeayea that works sometimes
can we do it with our examples?
oh no we can't (cuz look here the angles are the same)
I would argue that if your goal is periodicity, it's way easier done with what we did
here's a theorem for you:
if f(x) and g(x) are periodic of periods T1 and T2
and if T1/T2 is rational
then their sum, product, etc... is periodic
their ratio is not?
their ratio is periodic
ok
It's just kind of sad that we still won't be able to find the smallest period
but at least we can prove that it's periodic
if the function is periodic and non constant
and you find a period T
then the smallest period looks like T/n
yup
does it have to be a factor of the numerator?
wdym
of T in our case
we don't know what T looks like
nvm
I mean, it could be any number
yeah, but I think it would be pretty tough for us to find n through testing
it could be any positive number, right?
or did I get it wrong
so, for example when we found 20pi as our period
How would you go about finding the n for it?
Or is there a way to figure out whether the period we currently have is the smallest or not?
To use it as some guidance ig
it's actually pretty complicated
@opal vault I asked too many questions, sorry
like there is no actual easy method to finding the smallest period
yeah
I asked GPT and it suggested proof by contradiction, but again I think it is not as intuitive for less obvious cases
eg proof that the period we have is the smallest or not
this is for the very first example I gave you
sin3x + cos3/2x
I can't find anything online about this proof
I've learned a lot, thank you guys! @opal vault @neon iron
If you do not have anything to add, I can close the channel)
.close
Closed by @mellow root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm back ...
Literally the next problem asks me to find the main period of the following function:
(2^sinx - 2^(-sinx))/cosx
The answer is supposed to be Pi
which means I should express it as either tan or cot?
<@&286206848099549185>
write it as sinh (the hyperbolic sin) might make the expression simpler
ok
checking pi is a period is not difficult, again, the difficult part is to check that it is the main period.
how do we get rid of that 2 ...
I'm pretty sure they expect me to simplify this to tan or sth
Maybe somehow find the period of 2^sinx?
I'm not sure if they really want you to prove formally or just plot the graph and "spot" it or make an educated guess. Proving tan(x) has period pi is quite a challenge already (c.f. https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/941803)
I think we don't need to proof the period of Tan specifically)) just express it as tan is enough ig
so like if I somehow make this look sth like tan(angle) or cot(angle), I think we would be done here
you can't express that function as tan
yeah ...
then how can we find its smallest period
@neon iron
all of these functions have a *smallest period of PI
we need to prove it
maybe there is some pattern?
these and the one I mentioned above
what examples do they give you, and how do they prove it?
this problem is marked as hard, the book doesn't have any examples like these
ig they want me to figure it out on my own/with a teacher
I was asked about periods for functions, I'd start by taking the derivative and then looking at the critical points.
When I find the smallest repeating critical point gap, i'd go in and measure that part of the function to find its smallest period.
Sorry again if i'm being anti-helpful.
No idea about proving it but it seems to be a good starting point if you just need to justify it without proving.
@mellow root Has your question been resolved?
Yeah, we can def try derivatives and observe the function's behavior)) but that chapter is not covered here yet lol, so I assume they want us to use some other approach
sorry for the late reply I was away from my laptop:/
@mellow root Has your question been resolved?
I will skip this problem for now, if you guys come up with a solution, please let me know 🤎
.close
Closed by @mellow root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where do I go from here
I dont think Im understanding this
or did I do something wrong?
I'm not sure what to do with the 8x+20 on top
another u sub, which is (x^1/2 - 2) ( x^1/2 +2) maybe? (WRONG, oops)
Not sure that will work or not, sorry just a guess
4 * (2x + 5)
I see it now
So the answer is B?
Its C
yes yes
thx guys
.close
Closed by @peak edge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that if $0 \leq x <y$ then $x^n < y^n \forall n \in \N$
veni, vidi, veni
I did use that when I did this yesterday, yes
yes bc( y-x) must be positive
but don't I have to prove this?
Got it
I actually have another question, I suspect I can use the same method here too
Prove that if x<y , and n is odd x^n<y^n
but if you can send the q soon
same thing
yeah, I know
but instead like $x^2<y^2$
veni, vidi, veni
that's trivial to prove
I get that
thanks
now $x^3<x^2y$
veni, vidi, veni
and $x^2y<y^3$
veni, vidi, veni
hmm
This is the same problem
you could just factor this
assuming again your info is x < y
Prove that if x<y , and n is odd x^n<y^n
yes
I mean what I'm actually trying to prove is that x^3<y^3
what
didn't you prove the general case
for x^n < y^n
where n is odd
Veni, vidi, perii
and $x^ny<y^{n+1}$
Veni, vidi, perii
Veni, vidi, perii
so $y^{2n+1}>x^{2n+1}$
Veni, vidi, perii
and here 2n+1 is odd \forall n\in N

now , if $x^n=y^n$ to prove $x=y$, if n is odd
Veni, vidi, perii
I mean one way is just $x^n-y^n=0$
Veni, vidi, perii
not really
x,y <0 is possible
let x=-1, y=2
Well, this feels mechanical
I think I'll try another method?
$x =\frac{y^n}{x^{n-1}}$
Veni, vidi, perii
and $y = \frac{x^n}{y^{n-1}}$
Veni, vidi, perii
Veni, vidi, perii
uuh
I'm trying a different method
can I go cook some food
$y^n = \frac{y^{n^2}}{x^{n^2-n}}$
and come back to veni viid peri
Veni, vidi, perii
sure, why do you have to ask me
I mean I now kind of have to prove the same thing
are you trying to prove this?
cant you just use a contrapositive argument?
I don't think I've done that yet
$A \implies B \iff \neg B \implies \neg A$
eugene_krabs_has_cake
you seen that before?
Veni, vidi, perii
$x \neq y \implies x^n \neq y^n$
eugene_krabs_has_cake
for odd n
I mean I'd use the same argument here
yeah, I proved that here
ok then youre done
Closed by @ivory sorrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks a lot both of you
(assuming that proof is correct)
👍
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do I have to integrate 1/4u but also if I do how do I do that
you integrate 1/(4u) the same way you would integrate 1/(4x)
no
oh ok
do you know what the integral of 1/x = x^{-1} is?
no
do you know the derivative of ln(x)?
oh 1/x
yes. so following that, what is the integral of 1/x ?
ln(x)
,w integral of 1/x
okay i see
huh. I was sure it had absolute value?
to be extra general we usually write ln(|x|), since that has a larger domain
so would the integral of 1/4x be log(4x)?
oh cus you separate the 4
sorry yeah
okay thank you
sorry so like since i'm doing u substitution it is (1/4*lnu) and I just plug in my u and + c
.close
Closed by @turbid pebble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(A)i,j=|i-j|
A is nxn.
calculate detA.
any can walk me through solving it?
chatgpt seems to have incorrect solutions
also, was on my test yesterday
and there's no solutions
and conflicting answers
what kind of course is this from?
@mystic siren Has your question been resolved?
linear Algebra 1
do you need to prove your answer?
yes of course
what have you covered so far?
all the det() operations you can do, linear transformations and more
@mystic siren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Pls help
Where are the asymptotes for tan (x) ?
-pi/6 and pi/6
No just for tan(x) not the function
Indeed, so the number a, would be the solution of a*pi/6 = pi/2
Closed by @minor tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I found a potential way to answer this question
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that $|\frac{1}{x}| = \frac{1}{|x|}$
Veni, vidi, perii
so to start I considered $(|x|^{-1})^{-1}= |x|$
Veni, vidi, perii
so from that it follows that $|x|^{-1} = \frac{1}{|x|}$