#help-26
1 messages · Page 157 of 1
Ohhhh so you’re saying that the numbers bigger than 13.227 are in the .01 category
And we don’t know at what number a .001 category starts
yes
because your table doesnt have it
maybe if you use a different table with more columns then you'll be sure
It it possible there is no .001 to consider because it’s not on the table
So we never pick a category that isn’t listed on the table
Like even if instead of 96 it was 1 million. We still don’t pick .001 because it’s not on the table
yeah
@pastel birch bro can you check if I did #1 and 2 correct?
@verbal crater final answer .01?
sure
yeah
Sounds good
Did I get this one right?
It’s a similar practice problem
They’re saying they want to see if the 5 teas have different sales
Did I do it correctly?
They say : We will use the chi- square goodness-of-fit test to assess whether the five…
How come it’s the bottom one?
If I pick the bottom answer null hypothesis it says that all the sales are equal. That disagrees with the sentence of assessing if the 5 drinks have different sales.
ok i probably explained it poorly
the alternative hypothesis is basically someone like questioning the data
so they want to do a test
then probably 0.05
Why?
0.05 is like the cutoff point for statistical tests
if p<0.05, you reject the null hypothesis
otherwise you accept the null hypothesis
So if p=.04 you reject the null hypothesis?
yes
How do you figure out what the null hypothesis is?
for example in this test, they want to test if the sales are different right
thats the alternative hypothesis
the alternative hypothesis will be that the sales are indeed different
then the null hypothesis will be the opposite of that
so the null hypothesis is that the sales are not different
pretty much yeah
In the first one about the 1971 study it’s the opposite of that though
They show you the distribution fits and the null hypothesis is that the distribution fits
in that case, the test is about whether the distribution fits
so the alternative hypothesis will be that the distribution does not fit
But I thought right now we just agreed the alternative hypothesis is the one they tell you in the problem
Not the opposite
right now how do i explain this
Maybe give some random examples that would explain it better?
the null hypothesis is basically like what is claimed
so like if i said i earn 1000 dollars a month
thats the null hypothesis
now the alternative hypothesis challenges my claim
so it will be something like i dont earn 1000 dollars a month
I don’t think that explains the drink example problem
In that one they said the sales are different for each drink, but the null hypothesis is that they’re the same
because they are doing a test
doing a test means you're challenging their data correct?
hopefully this helps
im really bad at explaining this lmao
I’ll see if I can find a YouTube video or something
I have a final exam tomorrow so I’ll see if I can study other stuff to optimize the total points I get
If I get a mid C I can pass the class
@lapis lava Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I get the starting radian
my answer is correct except for the 4pi/3 part, I should've written 2pi/3. tbh I just randomly put 4pi/3 cuz the question before this had this answer but I don't know how to get it, where did 2pi/3 come from?
@jolly glade Has your question been resolved?
COME ON
@jolly glade Has your question been resolved?
are u sure that its 2pi/3?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question 3
Pls welp
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This
IIRC you need the "Helpful" to able to reopen channels that aren't your own
Ah thank you
@weak cliff Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @weak cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im tbh not sure
the only things I can think of are:
do you usually decorate your unit vectors? i.e. $\hat{\imath}$ or $\vec{i}$?
robin goodfellow
Else maybe they want x, y, z instead of i, j, k
very nice
thanks
all good! gl with your maths
.close
Closed by @gray horizon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find I_3 & I_4?
Damn scrolled up and nothing was answered for the past few hours 
not a physics server..
Closed by @slender bay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does c not exist because both one sided limits are different?
Number 4
yes
Closed by @pseudo pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Just to make sure f(2) exists because there’s a solid point there right? 4.d
yes
.close
Closed by @pseudo pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
Is it possible for L to exist on this graph shown? Like can it approach 5 from the left if there’s another graph there
What do you mean with if theres another graph there?
Like there’s a separate slope or line
I’m not sure what to call it
This is the question I’m answering
.rotate
,rotate
Only thing I can say is that the limit from the left DNE and the limit from the right does
Because we have a sinusoid on the left
Which i think is divided by x or whatever it kinda doesnt matter
The point is
It’s because like it’s a separate curve right
It can be any value between 4 and 2
We do not know
There is no limit
From the right it obviously goes to the value 3 though
Do you understand what Im saying? Im trying to explain it using intuition right now not really mathematical terms
Just apply the definition of limit. For example, for epsilon = 1/2 you already can't find a delta such that.. blablabla
It could be 2 different curves if thats what your asking
Is it because there’s too much sinusoid stuff happening
Yes
For example this limit here (blue curve i drew)
Also 2 separate curves
This limit does exist
Because we can find it from both the left and the right and it is the same
Your explanation should just be that the limit from the left DNE
I don’t think I could just write too much sinusoid stuff
Would be what I would do haha
But you could try saying it doesnt exist because the limit oscillates between 4 and 2
Explanation is that in any neighborhood of the point, there are always two points a,b such that f(a) - f(b) is 2
Which is greater than epsilon
Ok thanks
Yeah then it probably doesnt need to be that technical
Ok cool
Saying too much sinusoidal stuff happening would probably be good enough
Ok thank you
These kind of exercises are just to get a feel for limits
Closed by @pseudo pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Task: Assume that the points P, Q, and R lie on the sides AB, BC, and AC, respectively, of △ABC. Show that the circumcircles of △APR, △BPQ and △CQR meet at a single point.
I understand that I am suposed to use Miquels theorem, but I do not understand how I can prove that this is the case. I understand that if this is the case then the angles APR=AMR, BPQ=BMQ, CQR=CMR. But this does not prove anything if I just write it out.
@clear rivet Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@clear rivet Has your question been resolved?
@clear rivet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @clear rivet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"Using a convenient exponent law prove the logarithm law for log (x/y)"
I really hate these kinds of tasks.. Any recommendations on how to attack them?
Like I know that log (x/y) = log(x) - log(y)
I also know that we can have a^b / a^c = a^b-c
$e^{a-b}=e^{a}/e^{b}$,
yes
fish
perhaps, uh
and whenever you look at the answers from the old exams they always just write "see book" and in the book they're like "oh we'll leave this as an assigment for you to figure out yourself"
so what would the "ideal" way be to show this? and similar problems?
I had someone tell me to assume that it's the opposite for another kind of question that was of the "prove"-type yesterday but i'm not sure how to apply it here 😢
well, if $e^{log(x/y)}=e^{log(x)-log(y)}$, then the law is true
fish
or alternatively, $log(x/y)=log(x)-log(y)$ gives x/y=x/y if exponential is taken
fish
you think smth like this would work?
i feel like it's circular reasoning when i take out the ln e^b in the 2nd row on RHS
like im using what i want to prove ._-
fish
fish
yes
and then hit it with e
yes
yes
and perhaps write some context like
"Using the fact that e^x - y is equivalent to e^x / e^y"
ok i'll try to remember this tactic
so essentially set up LHS to be where i start and RHS where i want to end assuming the rule is true
thank you a ton
legend
.close
Closed by @rocky jewel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think you forgot to multiply the denomenator by sqrt(6+x)+3
Closed by @grim swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i get the derivative of (1-(6/(x+8)
1 is just 0
do i do -6 * 1/x+8
d/dx 1/(x+8) is 1
cause d/dx of x is just 1 and d/dx of 8 is 0
Its 1/(x + 8) not (x + 8)
So the derivative wouldn't be 1
Rewrite it in index notation and apply the power rule
wdym
like
(x+8)^-1
-6 * (x+8)^-1
Yes
how do i get the derivative of the last term
Alberto Z.
(with n ≠ -1)
u mean chain rule
so g'(x) = 6(x+8)^-2
or 6/(x+8)^2 whichever u prefer
so i did
x^3 * 6(x+8)^-2 + (3x^2)(1-6/(x+8))
(-6x^3)/(x+8)^2 + (3x^2) - (18x/8)
Yep correct
am i done
hm how
The first minus (in front of the 6) should be a plus, now that I look carefully
And also the third term is -18x²/(x + 8)
Yeah
Closed by @severe lichen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You're welcome 🤗
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
look at the top function again
ryuh
@fiery sigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Each of the five quarters was marked using the same process, so it is possible to have duplicate letters within the set of five coins. No coin has the same letter written on both sides.
After marking the coins, they are placed in an opaque cloth bag. You reach into the bag and select a coin using a blind draw. Once selected, you flip the coin and place it on a table. You repeat this process for each coin, drawing it at random from the cloth bag, flipping it, and then placing it on the table. You do not have any special coin-flipping skill; the coin flip causes a random side of the coin to be selected. After the coins have all been drawn and flipped, the coins are arranged in a neat row in the order in which they were drawn.
Suppose you were hopeful that the result would spell the word "HELLO" after the selection and flipping process was completed. Furthermore, suppose that by random chance the marking of the coins coincidentally maximized the odds that you would get a favorable outcome. Keep in mind that the order in which the coins are drawn from the bag is still entirely random.
In this favorable scenario, what is the probability that the letters on the coins spell the word "HELLO"?
Could someone tell me if I am going in the right direction here?
My initial thinking was that the optimal markings for the coins to spell out "HELLO" would be for each coin to have one of the needed letters on either side, but not the same letter as the other side. So for example the coins might looks like this:
(H, O)
(E, L)
(L, E)
(L, H)
(O, L)
So all I would need is to calculate the probability of them being in the correct order using 5! or 1/120.
The one thing I am not sure about is if there being 2 repeating L's makes getting "HELLO" more likely than just 1/5!
@odd birch Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> 😳
Wouldn’t it be more favorable to have two double-sided L coins?
I assume so but I have no idea how to calculate that
- Brute force
- Approach it one coin at a time. Ex. For the first coin, what’s the probability that it has an H? Then, what’s the probability you actually end up with an H? Rinse and repeat.
can someone help me with calc2 problems?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Wouldn't I have to like list out every single combination of heads/tails across the 4 letters for all 5 coins for this to work?
No
Well how do I know the probability of the first coin being an H if I don't know each side of all the remaining coins?
What if the remaining 4 coins all have an H? What if none of the remaining coins have an H?
What happened to the “favorable scenario” part
Well yeah obviously that is the part I have to figure out, the way that the 4 letters are spread across the 10 sides of all the coins, but I don't know how to figure that out
I’ll do this case since it’s the easiest to demonstrate my point with, but it’s the same for the other cases
Let’s say we have a (H,O), (H,E), (O,E) coin
The same coin cannot have the same letter on each side
Nvm
Then, there’s a 2/3 chance we pick a coin with H and a 1/2 chance we actually land on H
Let’s say we pick the (H,O) coin
Then, we have (H,E) and (O,E) coin
And you can continue the logic from here - there’s a 1/2 chance of picking the coin with O and a 1/2 chance of actually flipping O
And then a 1/2 chance of picking an E
The other two cases are basically the same thing, so I’ll leave those to you
Anyway, I gtg now, but hopefully this helps 👋
Does this include accounting for needing the coins to be in the correct order though?
The coins are drawn randomly
… I’m actually high
I'm like more confused now lol
(H,
(E,
(L,
(L,
(O,
ok let's pair two of the letters with the L's
wlog, let's use H and E
(H,
(E,
(L, H)
(L, E)
(O,
so we just need to pair off L, L, O
so O pairs with L
and wlog, H pairs with L and E pairs with O
(H, L)
(E, O)
(L, H)
(L, E)
(O, L)
ok yeah your original config is the same thing, just with E and H switched
- Flip H -> p = (2/5)(1/2) = 1/5
so then you have (E,O), (L,H), (L,E), (O,L) left
- Flip an E -> two cases: (E,O) or (L,E)
I. (E,O) -> p = 1/8
(L, H), (L, E), (O, L) remaining
-
flip an L -> p = (2/3)(1/2) = 1/3
-
flip another L -> p = (1/2)(1/2)
-
flip an O -> p = 1/2
II. (L, E) -> p =1/8
(E, O), (L, H), (O, L)
- flip an L
- (L,H) -> p=1/6
(E,O) and (O,L) left, the probability of L then O is 1/8
- (O,L)
(E,O) and (L,H) left, the probability of L then O is 1/8
yeah it's just nasty casework
I cannot imagine that this is the answer considering that this question comes from like a very basic entry level CS thing where they ask me to explain my reasoning for the answer in a single sentence lol, but I will try to figure it out
hm
wut
idk where that image came from
ignore that
Could someone tell me if I am going in the right direction here?
My initial thinking was that the optimal markings for the coins to spell out "HELLO" would be for each coin to have one of the needed letters on either side, but not the same letter as the other side. So for example the coins might looks like this:
(H, O)
(E, L)
(L, E)
(L, H)
(O, L)So all I would need is to calculate the probability of them being in the correct order using 5! or 1/120.
The one thing I am not sure about is if there being 2 repeating L's makes getting "HELLO" more likely than just 1/5!
we could test it for an easier case
lemme do that rq
There should be like an exact answer in the format of "N in M" according to the question
So I really think it is simple
how long do you have to do this
because I think the repetition is an issue
The instructions for the thing say it shouldn't take long at all
eh maybe we are overthinking it
It is the only question I am not 100% sure about
have you learned any fancy probability stuff
or just the definition and nothing else
No
so no recursion, right?
What if we were to reorder "HELLO"?
Like if we did L, L, H, E, O
get the Ls out of the way first
(H, O)
(E, L)
(L, E)
(L, H)
(O, L)
ah wait
this forces us to pick (E, L) and (L, O or H)
so let's say we pick (E, L) and (L, O) in some order
then we're left with (H, O), (L, E), (L, H)
and then this part is smooth sailing
actually I think this is it
oh wait...
I feel like the question is asking how to start a car and you are trying to like explain how to build a car from scratch
nah I'm using too many words to explain my point (mainly cause I was thinking out loud)
(H, O)
(E, L)
(L, E)
(L, H)
(O, L)
If we have this, then we must have (E, L) and either (L, H) or (L, O) for the L coins
and then the other three coins are fixed
that's it
._.
1 in 3840 was my first answer where I assume each coin had one of HELO and one other random letter on the other side, then I would do (1/2)^5 multiplied by 1/5!
But that didn't seem as optimal as each coin having a needed letter on each side
wouldn't you need to multiply that by 4 for this part tho? (which of the L coins you pick first and which of the two other L coins you use for an L)
which gives you 1 in 960
I cannot even keep up with all of the like strange formatting so I honestly have no clue
Do you want me to try to explain it differently?
cause I'll admit I did kinda gloss over this part
yeah idk i was like maybe 30% confident when I posted and now i'm at 0% tbh lol
so is that a yes?
i guess but i feel like you are just not understanding how simple of a question this is meant to be
Coins: (O, H), (L, E), (L, E), (L, H), (O, L)
Note that there's two coins with E's, so one of them must give us the E and one of them must give us the L
so that means we need to figure out how to order (O, H), (L, H), (O, L)
and at this point, there's 2 possibilities:
- (L, H) gives us the L, (O, H) gives the H, (O, L) gives the O
- (O, L) gives the L, (O, H) gives the O, (L, H) gives the H
tldr: with the optimal labelings, only two orderings of coins work
How am I meant to explain this with two regular sentences lol
Take the coins to be labeled as (insert), observing that there are two coins with Es (meaning they must give an E and an L). This leaves two ways to order the other three coins (and thus all the coins) to spell HELLO, yielding the probability to be (2/(5!/2!))(1/2^5) = (whatever the hell that is).
like I said, I write a lot of stuff when I think out loud, so it appears way longer than it actually is
@odd birch are you good?
I'm trying to like figure out how to write that as a fraction so I can turn it into N in M
but I dunno it just still seems convoluted given the context the question is in
,w (2/(5!/2!))(1/2^5)
eh I'm not gonna force you to use it
but that's what I would say
so I know that (1/2^5) is the chance that each of the coins gets the side you need, yes?
yes
and the 2/(5!/2!)) is just accounting for there being 5 possible permutations since the set is has 5 things in it, but there is a repitition in the correct permutation?
2 is the number of favorable permutations, 5!/2! is the number of permutations, and 1/2^5 is the probability you do all the flips properly
is the 5!/2! part in any way related to this? https://www.ck12.org/Probability/Permutations-with-Repetition/lesson/Permutations-with-Repetition-BSC-PST/
And this works for like either of the two possible sets of coins?
what does "two possible sets of coins" refer to here
the two favored ones or two sets of coins that both yield the optimal result
Coins: (O, H), (L, E), (L, E), (L, H), (O, L)
Note that there's two coins with E's, so one of them must give us the E and one of them must give us the L
so that means we need to figure out how to order (O, H), (L, H), (O, L)
whatever this was about
5!/2! is the total number of permutations given that the coins are labeled optimally
so why is that under 2 then in the first fraction?
So there are 60 possible arrangements that can be made from HELLO as well? Because both Apple and Hello are 5 letters with a letter that repeats twice?
yes
we care about how to order the coins and not the letters themselves
but like I said, it's the same thing
we have 5 coins and two of them are the same
so if you know how, can you explain why the 5!/2! goes under the two? the diagram doesn't make a whole of of sense to me
I can see where 5!/2! is coming from but not the 2 above it
tldr: with the optimal labelings, only two orderings of coins work
two orderings (permutations) of the total 5!/2! work
I would provide an example of an optimal arrangement for extra clarity
I would also say "there are 5!/2!=60 possible orderings of coins" rather than "we can use (5!/2!) or 60"
and I'd say "... land on the correct side, yielding an answer of 1/960"
basically cut out the last sentence of pure arithmetic
(O, H), (L, E), (L, E), (L, H), (O, L) so this is one of the 2 optimal sets of coins?
you could double up (L, O), (L, H), or (L, E)
I wouldn't mention the total number of optimal labelings
it's not particularly relevant
The optimal arrangement of letters on the coins would allow for each coin to have a different needed letter on both sides (ex: (O, H), (L, E), (L, E), (L, H), (O, L)). Since the bag contains exactly 5 coins but with a repetition (letter L) in the correct permutation, there are 5!/2!=60 possible permutations. Because there are 2 permutations out of the total 60 that give us the correct letters, we can use (2/60) and multiply it by (1/(2^5)) since we need all 5 coins to land on the correct side, yielding an answer of 1/960.
So this?
I understand it but like don't know how to like word it so they know what I am thinking lol
The optimal arrangement of letters on the An optimal labeling of the coins ~~would allow for each coin to have a different needed letter on both sides (ex: ~~ is (O, H), (L, E), (L, E), (L, H), (O, L). Since the bag contains exactly 5 coins but with a repetition (letter L) in the correct permutation but two of the same coin, there are 5!/2!=60 possible permutations orders to draw the coins. Because There are 2 permutations out of the total 60 that give us the correct letters, __possible orders to draw the coins in where it is possible to obtain the order "HELLO", making the probability of drawing such an order we can use (2/60). Since each coin must land on the correct side, and multiply it by we multiply this by (1/(2^5)) since we need all 5 coins to land on the correct side, yielding an answer of 1/960.
@odd birch ?
anything else
cause I'm going to sleep soon
lol i was trying to get rid of all the markdown
but i think thats it
thx for helping
👍
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
you could've just asked me for the version without the markdown too 😭
@odd birch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
this is not a question
do you have an actual question?
if not, please close this channel and stop trolling
well, I'll give OP one more minute
if nothing, then I'm closing this
a tragedy.
.close
Closed by @pseudo sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Lizzy
i cant seem to find it
but since u can factorize the denominator
u can try partial fraction
yeah ppl only use it in integrals
for sum
reason
everyone is
same here
but ur math seems more advanced
so what we study
is like baby play to u
i dont do calc
im still in analysis
i js learn it for fun by myself
eh
ty
HELL YES
some minecraft to ease the pain
from education
play modded :3
still w bud
non create modded still underrated
gregtech
wut
you’re learning math the way that it developed historically
if i learn triangle similarity before thales theorem
am i learning math in a historically developped way
mod
did u not figure out partial fraction
greg tech 🔥
im tucked in bed
here it is
partially fractioned
if thats a word
1/(x-1) btw can be deemed to be -1/(1-x)
Yeah that should do it
sup jasono
u want it in 1/(1-x) form kinda?
well
u can add up two terms
in one sum
So turn the two fractions into individual p series
well would it work if the second term is in 1/1-x form?
Then add them together?
what i thought
to add the sums?
if they have same boundaries
u can add them
Im confused, to me the phrase p series means a series of the form 1/x^p
Lizzy do you have any example work I can see
Lizzy
Perhaps we can get them into a geometric series? Is that what you mean
lizzy in confusion
Thanks
Lizzy
Lizzy, just for future reference, a power series and p series is not the same thing
Anyways first the fraction decomposition should give you
$\frac{3x}{(x-1)(x+2)} = \frac{1}{x-1} + \frac{2}{x+2}$
Oops
$-\frac{1}{1-x} = -\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^n$
Also $\frac{2}{x+2} = \frac{2}{2(1 + \frac{x}{2})} = \frac{1}{1 + \frac{x}{2}}$
So $\frac{1}{1 + \frac{x}{2}} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^n \left(\frac{x}{2}\right)^n$
°Jason Parker°
Thats it
Then you combine the two series
$\frac{3x}{(x-1)(x+2)} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \left( (-1)^n - 1 \right) x^n$
°Jason Parker°
Closed by @balmy meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\frac{p^4-1}{3p^2+3} = \frac{p^2-1}{3}$
Tchaikovsky
Oh wait this is true for any p, is the question to prove it is true for any p or something
yeah this is true for any p
im wondering how they got the answer
use some factoring
what steps were taken
i know binomial formulae
yea
okay p^4 equals (p^2)^2 right
If you take square and then take square again you get 4th power
ok
Oh why you ask
because the book says i should be able to solve that mentally
but im not that good yet
Who cares what the book says
at least i dont think
ok
Are we good with this
yea
3p^2+3 = 3(p^2+1) are we okay with this
no 3(p^2+1)
Tchaikovsky
Yeah, p^2+1’s cancel each other
we multiplied by that and then divided by that cancelled it out
okay i see now thank you
no problem
i will send a simular problem here im having trouble with but you dont have to help me if you dont want to
You can send it
Tchaikovsky
$\frac{15u^2-24uv}{12u^2}=\frac{\frac{5u^2-8uv}{3u}}{\frac{12u^2}{3u}}=\frac{5u-8v}{4u}$
which way is more ideal
when the book gave me this problem i solved it the bottom way
but it told me the solution with the top way
Both gibe you the answer
there isn’t any problem then?
Tchaikovsky
okay
i was just wondering if my way was not the best
since the book gave a different approach
you got the answer doesn’t matter
okay
In both you just simplify everything by 3u
I personally would’ve thought of the first but doesn’t matter they are doing the same thing
Closed by @vocal girder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the Zero of the function?
a zero of a function f is a number x with f(x)=0
Can it be interpreted as, what numbers that can make the function 0?
yes
What if theres none?
well then there is none
Beersathought
Then its something like
Zero of the function : None
Restriction x = 10?
Yes
It's a Rational Inequality
Though I have no idea what that means
a rational function is a polynomial divided by a polynomial
Is Rational function same thing as Rational equation?
no
they are connected obviously but a function is not an equation
Smth like $f(x) = -\sqrt{x-2} + 2$
Beersathought
I see
well thats not a rational function but yes
Oh wait this is Radical functions right
yes
Ohh are Rational functions the one with, Asymptotes?
The Vertical, Horizontal, Oblique, x integers and y integers?
well lots of functions have asymptotes
.
so something like f(x)=(x-3)/(x^2+17x-1)
Beersathought
This is a very dumb question, how do you know if a term? is a polynomial?
a polynomial is a sum of terms of the form number*x^k where k is some natural number
Something like 4x , and -2 is a single term right?
yes
But if combined, 4x-2 this is a polynomial, correct?
even on their own they would already be polynomials
well for example x could be time in some physical experiment. then the horizontal asymptote would tell you what happens to whatever f represents when the experiment runs for very long
What's "f"
f(x)
@elfin niche Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @elfin niche
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
alright, I understand all the sin/cos/tan stuff I just struggle with the way of solving the square roots, like why did the sqrt(65) go up and is multiplied by the b(4)
When a square root is in the denominator, we multiply and divide the square root by itself
So the denominator becomes rational
I see, ok I have another question. is there a simple way of finding 4sqrt(26)?
The closest perfect square number close to 26 is?
hmm I know that, but is there a quick way of finding it? or do I have to keep dividing by numbers until I find it's perfect square number
You could remember some perfect square numbers like upto 15 or something
But yes there is a way to calculate
Square roots
You can look it up on YouTube or wait for someone else as I last used it years ago
alright, I will go do some searching. thank you so much
No problem.
.close
Closed by @long magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @vale hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I solve it without using polar form?
@sturdy forge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
there is couple ways to do it
one way is to transform the integeral over D to one over dx and dy
1: what does D bound y by?
2: if we fix y, what are the possible values of x?
Are u saying that x will become √(4-y²)? I was doing it like integration of small circle through the radius as it is a disc
x will be between -√(4-y²) and √(4-y²)
fixing a y value, we are integrating the horizontal strip between -√(4-y²) and √(4-y²)
Yeah and y will be in between -2 to 2?
Because if I put zero in the place of y then I got -2 and 2
yeah
think of it this way:
the integral over D = integral_{-2}^2 something dy
what is this "something"?
it is the red lines that are formed when we fix y
Oh ..yes and then we are ranging x as -2 to 2 which is also radius
the way we are ranging x depends on y
as you see the length of the red line sort of depends on the y coordinate
so $$\int_D =\int_{-2}^2 \text{length of red line} \ dy$$
qwertytrewq
and the length of the red line, weighted by some function $f$ is our normal one variable integral!
qwertytrewq
Yeah. ..I think if I do first integral w.r.t x then I will get the equation of a line
yeah then can you figure out what the integral is?
$$
$$\int\int_D x+y+10\ dx\ dy= \int_{-2}^2\int_?^? x+y+10\ dx\ dy$$
qwertytrewq
X limits are from -√(4-y²) to √(4-y²)
OK!
so now you can compute the integral this way
$$\int_{-2}^2\int_{-\sqrt {4-y^2}}^{\sqrt{4-y^2}} x+y+10\ dx\ dy$$
qwertytrewq
Closed by @sturdy forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to show without calculator
assume both the arcsine terms to be a,b or whatever you like
then say those a+b=y
yeah
now you may proceed by taking sine on both sides
sine (a+b) = siny
yeah
Closed by @sullen herald
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
like b4 i aint got a clue on what to do 🤣
sin is the opposite over disgonal, so i would draw a triangle with oppsite as 2 and diagonal 3
.close
Closed by @sullen herald
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i found without drawing i think
oh 🔥 if u solved it
✅
.close
Closed by @sullen herald
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's the difference between system of equations and simultaneous equations?
in almost all contexts, these phrases are interchangeable
@eternal plume Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question
i was able to notice that if we get together cot 28 , cotcot32 ,cot 88 together it helps
it would be cot84 all together
anf will look like cot84 * cot12 * cot24 *cot48
cot84 * cot12 * cot24 *cot48 (cot 72) tan72
cot84 * cot12 * {cot24 * cot48 * cot72 }* tan72
cot84 * cot12 * {cot72}* tan72
cot84 * cot12
now what
cot is cotangens here? remember what cotangens is supposed to express
cos/sin
Jigglyproff
i dont see any such complementary angles
mm
yea
Closed by @small trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi everyone.
I'm stuck with this: $\lim_{x\to +\infty} \sqrt[3]{2+x^3} - \sqrt[3]{1+2x^2+x^3}$
Shadow91518
(a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2) = a^3 - b^3
rationalisation!
@fallow torrent Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fallow torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone guide me part (c) ?
Hint: Write the area of the shaded region as a difference of areas
@half field Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is not really a math problem but a mod told me asking was ok
It's a physics circuit related question. And more of a conceptual question than a specific problem. I did a capacitor circuit problem with the following diagram today. Where "L" is closed/connected. C2 and C3 and evidently in parallel.
But I argued with a classmate since I thought (C2 and C3) were in series with (C1 and C4), while they thought they were in parallel
My confusion is: What exactly defines that 2 branches are in parallel? Just that the two of them start in the same node, and end in the same node?
This is what the diagram looks like with L closed
and, if I "replace" C2 and C3 with an equivalent capacitor C23 according to them being in parallel, it would seem that now there are 3 capacitors in series
hm
but the truth is that originally there were 3 branches in parallel right?
which branches?
a C2 branch, a C3 branch, and a C1 -> C4 branch
All three of which share their starting node and their ending node
I tried to color the nodes in green and red here, and in purple what I'm considering the 3 "branches"
like, it would be just as valid to first combine C1 and C4 into an equivalent C41 capacitor (As they are in series), and then the diagram looks like this right?
Can I just combine any 2 of these "in parallel" , and then that combination is left "in series" with the remaining branch?
is it wrong to combine these 3 at once "in parallel"?
I'm probably just deeply misguided at a fundamental level on something here
it depends on how the battery is placed/connected
there was no battery in this circuit
just a capacitor with a starting charge, and then the circuit was closed and the question was about the resulting charge configuration
ah good enough then
"like a loop" here meaning, a closed circuit that is not connected anywhere else?
and does "go with the series interpretation" mean choosing any 2 of the 3 branches to first "combine" in parallel, and then "combine" the resulting circuit "in series" ?
I had a followup question about what would change by adding a battery like this, if that changes what things are "in parallel" or "in series". But you kinda already answered that maybe? that it does
Are things still technically the same, just that there is no way to "replace" a battery and a capacitor in series with a single capacitor, so we solve/simplify things in the only way/s that we can? (Being forced to leave the battery as-is, thus having to "merge" C2 and C3)
the issue is something being in parallel or series implies there’s some concept of current
if there was a battery like this then yes the equivalent circuit would have three capacitors in series
however say you took another wire and connected the two nodes in that circuit to a battery. then your equivalent circuit would have three capacitors in parallel
Mhm
that makes sense
I'm not sure how I'd solve circuits with multiple batteries then but
before going there, I tried to "solve" the equivalent circuit in different "ways" for the no-battery one, and it gives different results. So the reference point taken matters
I suppose maybe I should explain the original exercise that made me question this better
C1, C2 and C3 hold no charge
C4 holds a charge Q4
then L is closed
And it asks what the charge is at C3 after the system stabilizes
would C4 here act as a battery?
in terms of what I should consider "in series" or "in parallel" I mean
once everything is stabilized, all capacitors act as capacitors. the one thing that holds over is that the total charge on all capacitors must be the same as the original charge on C4
well, the charge at C1 is the same as the original one in C4, right?
the question is how the charge in C2 and C3 is distributed
but their sum is the same as Q4
with this polarity, I think?
Where Q1=Q4=Q2+Q3
the polarities on the top capacitors should be reversed. note that C4 is in parallel with the equivalent C(1,2,3) capacitor
doesnt the charge on each plate of C4 generate an opposite charge in the other end of each node?
when L is released, + charge from C4 must flow out and accumulate on the left plates of C2 and C3, causing + charge to leave the right plates (hence a - charge build up) and so on throughout the circuit
we should also note that on C4, the left side has a higher potential than the right side, so that should be reflected on the top capacitors
ah, you're right. I'm being dumb
so here, "parallel" or "in series" is defined by the polarities?
like, if they share charge
Thanks a lot to both of you, I think I get it now
here i would say that they are in parallel if both plates are connected, and in series if one plate is connected
@empty gyro Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @empty gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do part B?
What is the shaded area to the left of point P ?
just set up 2 integrals that are equal to each other
the integral from 0 to P should be equal to the integral from P to k
Closed by @lucid junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats the formula for counting
if i have 5 = 100%
then i need 6 = .. ?
oh nvm im dumb
6/5 * 100% ?
Yeah, it's proportion
yes
the result is 120% but something is odd
well, im playing a game and i have a pistol with 5 ammo
with bonus stats 14,8%
somehow i got extra bullet
You are lucky
lucky for having a broken game
@iron tapir Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @iron tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the difference between an implicit and an explicit function?
If it is neatly written in terms of x, then it is explicit and if not it is implicit, but what if I have
x + y = 1
y = 1-x
These two are basically denoting the same relation of x and y
But is the first one explicit and second one implicit?
also what are the times I will not be able to convert an implicit function to an explicit function
One example I can think of is when y has a square on it, like y^2 + x^2 = 25
This will result into two functions if we try to separate it
Opposite, first one is implicit and second one is implicit
but yeah, they denote the same relation
"explicit" and "implicit" are tied to the way of writing the relation, rather than the relation itself
Usually it will be when it's either not even a function (such as the circle example you provided), or when it's hard / impossible to write it explicitly in closed form
$y^{2}+y\cdot2^{y}-\frac{x^2}{y}=0$
MæthIsAlwaysRight
something like this would be probably really hard to write explicitly
closed form meaning?
it means that it's writable in terms of standard functions and operations
oh ok
e.g. you cant convert this to an explicit closed form
at least im pretty sure you cant
I have studied about functions a lot but relations I haven't studied about much, they just popped up in differentiation lol
I was studying implicit diffrentiation
yes
got it
k thank you that clears it up
I'll ask more doubts see ya again
👋
.close
Closed by @raw zenith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
Given a trapezoid
ABCD
Ad is 6 , BC is 8, and the angle between the diagonals alpha is 90
CD is x, AB is 14-x
Find x
AD and BC is top and down sides?
No
Aha
u have to find x right?
Be more patient, helpers are supposed to be pinged after at least 15 mins of waiting
wait, whats that 4sqrt2 side?
Yes
I tried sketching something
I tried constructing CQ perpendicular to the diagonla BR
